Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre: an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin
Duncker & Humblot
[2021]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure
Band/Volume 48 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 286 Seiten 23.3 cm x 15.7 cm, 418 g |
| ISBN: | 9783428183593 3428183592 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047451584 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20211112 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210902s2021 gw m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 015 | |a 21,N29 |2 dnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 1237120667 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9783428183593 |c Paperback: EUR 89.90 (DE), EUR 92.50 (AT) |9 978-3-428-18359-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 3428183592 |9 3-428-18359-2 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9783428183593 | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a Bestellnummer: 18359 |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1260846418 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB1237120667 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a gw |c XA-DE-BE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-188 |a DE-19 |a DE-703 |a DE-355 | ||
| 084 | |a PR 2210 |0 (DE-625)139529: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |8 1\p |a 340 |2 23sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lanza, Giulia |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1241058059 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre |b an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |c by Giulia Lanza |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin |b Duncker & Humblot |c [2021] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
| 300 | |a 286 Seiten |c 23.3 cm x 15.7 cm, 418 g | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure |v Band/Volume 48 | |
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Georg-August-Universität Göttingen |d 2018 | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Internationaler Strafgerichtshof |0 (DE-588)3042935-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafrechtsdogmatik |0 (DE-588)4336721-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Tatherrschaft |0 (DE-588)4227897-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Teilnahme |0 (DE-588)4059331-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit |0 (DE-588)4124385-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Italien |0 (DE-588)4027833-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | |a Indirect Perpetration | ||
| 653 | |a International Criminal Court | ||
| 653 | |a Organisationsherrschaftslehre | ||
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Italien |0 (DE-588)4027833-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Tatherrschaft |0 (DE-588)4227897-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Strafrechtsdogmatik |0 (DE-588)4336721-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Internationaler Strafgerichtshof |0 (DE-588)3042935-3 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Teilnahme |0 (DE-588)4059331-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |a Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit |0 (DE-588)4124385-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Duncker & Humblot |0 (DE-588)5082687-6 |4 pbl | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-3-428-58359-1 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure |v Band/Volume 48 |w (DE-604)BV048552805 |9 48 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m DNB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032853569&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032853569 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a vlb |d 20210716 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182751022153728 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
A.
INTRODUCTION
..........................................................................................................
17
I.
THE
PROBLEM
............................................................................................
17
II.
OBJECTIVE
OF
THE
INVESTIGATION
..................................................................
20
III.
METHODOLOGY
............................................................................................
21
IV.
TERMINOLOGY
............................................................................................
23
B.
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
...................................................................
27
I.
CONTEXT
AND
ORIGIN
..................................................................................
27
II.
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
AS
AN
AUTONOMOUS
FORM
OF
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
..............................................................................................
32
1.
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS
......................................................................
32
2.
THE
CONSTITUTIVE
ELEMENTS
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
....
35
A)
THE
EXISTENCE
OF
A
HIERARCHICAL
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
AND
THE
COMMAND
AUTHORITY
OF
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
.............................
35
AA)
THE
EXISTENCE
OF
A
HIERARCHICAL
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
..............
35
BB)
THE
COMMAND
AUTHORITY
OF
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
..............
37
B)
THE
DETACHMENT
OF
THE
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
FROM
THE
LAW
............
41
C)
THE
FUNGIBILITY
OF
THE
DIRECT
PERPETRATORS
......................................
43
D)
THE
DIRECT
PERPETRATOR
S
DISPOSITION
TO
COMMIT
THE
ACT
................
46
3.
THE
DEFINITION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
ACCORDING
TO
ROXIN
..................................................................................................
49
III.
ALTERNATIVE
SOLUTIONS
TO
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
....................
50
1.
CO-PERPETRATION
...................................................................................
50
2.
INSTIGATION
............................................................................................
52
C.
TOWARDS
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
AT
THE
ICC
..................................................................................................................
55
I.
THE
PREMISES
OF
THE
ADOPTION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
AT
THE
ICC
..............................................................................................
55
1.
THE
CODIFICATION
OF
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
IN
ART.
25(3)(A),
THIRD
ALTER
NATIVE,
ICCST
......................................................................................
55
2.
DOES
ART.
25(3)
ICCST
PROVIDE
FOR
A
DIFFERENTIATED
PARTICIPATION
MODEL?
................................................................................................
59
A)
GENERAL
REMARKS
ON
THE
NORMATIVE
CONTEXT
OF
INDIRECT
PERPETRA
TION
WITHIN
THE
MEANING
OF
ART.
25(3)(A)
ICCST
............................
59
B)
THE
DOMINANT
APPROACH
................................................................
65
C)
THE
MINORITY
APPROACH
..................................................................
69
D)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
..............................................................
72
10
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
3.
THE
ADOPTION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
CRIME
THEORY
AS
A
CRITERION
TO
DISTINGUISH
PRINCIPALS
FROM
ACCESSORIES
TO
A
CRIME
........................
76
A)
A
PECULIAR
DEMAND
OF
THE
DIFFERENTIATED
PARTICIPATION
MODELS
...
76
B) THE
DOMINANT
APPROACH
.................................................................
81
AA)
THE
LUBANGA
CASE
...................................................................
81
BB)
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASES
...........................................
84
C)
THE
MINORITY
APPROACH
...................................................................
86
AA)
THE
LUBANGA
CASE
...................................................................
86
BB)
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASES
............................................
87
D)
CONFLICTING
APPROACHES:
THE
DOMINANT
APPROACH
V.
THE
MINORITY
APPROACH
.........................................................................................
88
E)
THE
NORMATIVE
APPROACH
V.
THE
NATURALISTIC
APPROACH
...................
89
F)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
...............................................................
92
II.
THE
INTERPRETATION
AND
APPLICATION
OF
ART.
25(3)(A),
THIRD
ALTERNATIVE,
ICCST
..........................................................................................................
94
1.
THE
APPEARANCE
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
IN
ICL:
A
FEEBLE
AND
UNCERTAIN
ATTEMPT
(THE
AD
HOC
TRIBUNALS)
........................
95
A)
ICTY:
THE
STAKIC
CASE
AND
THE
MILUTINOVIC
ET
AL.
CASE
................
95
B)
ICTR:
JUDGE
SCHOMBURG
S
SEPARATE
OPINION
APPENDED
TO
THE
GACUMBITSI
APPEALS
JUDGMENT
.......................................................
98
C)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
.................................................................
100
2.
THE
INTRODUCTION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
IN
THE
CASE
LAW
OF
THE
ICC
.......................................................................................
101
A)
THE
LUBANGA
CASE
.............................................................................
103
B)
THE
BEMBA
CASE
...............................................................................
104
C)
THE
AL
BASHIR
CASE
...........................................................................
105
D) THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASES
...................................................
108
AA)
FACTUAL
BACKGROUND
AND
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
...........................
108
BB)
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CONFIRMATION
OF
CHARGES
DECISION
110
CC)
THE
NGUDJOLO
TRIAL
JUDGMENT
.................................................
114
DD)
THE
KATANGA
TRIAL
JUDGMENT
...................................................
115
E)
THE
GADDAFI
CASE
...........................................................................
118
F)
THE
MUTHAURA,
KENYATTA
AND
ALI
CASE
AND
THE
RUTO,
KOSGEY
AND
SANG
CASE
(THE
KENYA
CASES)
.........................................................
121
G)
THE
NTAGANDA
CASE
.........................................................................
127
H) THE
AL
HASSAN
CASE
.......................................................................
131
3.
ART.
25(3)
ICCST
IN
LIGHT
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
........
132
A)
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY:
INDIRECT
CO-PERPETRATION
AND
JOINT
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
................
132
B)
THE
ELEMENTS
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY:
IN
SEARCH
OF
A
DEFINITION
.....................................................................
136
AA)
THE
EXISTENCE
OF
AN
ORGANISED
AND
HIERARCHICAL
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
................................................................................
138
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
11
BB)
THE
COMMISSION
OF
THE
CRIMES
MUST
BE
SECURED
BY
ALMOST
AUTOMATIC
COMPLIANCE
WITH
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
S
ORDERS
..
139
CC)
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
S
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
....
141
DD)
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
S
FULFILMENT
OF
THE
SUBJECTIVE
ELE
MENTS
OF
THE
CRIMES,
INCLUDING
ANY
REQUIRED
ADDITIONAL
INTENT
143
EE)
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
S
AWARENESS
OF
THE
FACTUAL
CIRCUM
STANCES
ENABLING
HIM
OR
HER
TO
EXERCISE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
CRIME
THROUGH
THE
ORGANISATION
.......................................
143
C)
A
DEFINITION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
CASE
LAW
...............................................................
144
4.
CRITICAL
OBSERVATIONS
AND
OPEN
QUESTIONS
........................................
144
III.
THE
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
149
1.
THE
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
ACCORDING
TO
THE
CASE
LAW
OF
THE
ICC
....................................
150
2.
ART.
21
ICCST
AND
THE
SOURCES
OF
LAW
REGIME
PROVIDED
BY
THE
ROME
STATUTE
...................................................................................................
157
3.
THE
VIENNA
CONVENTION
ON
THE
LAW
OF
TREATIES
(VCLT)
..................
161
4.
THE
PRINCIPLE
OF
LEGALITY
.....................................................................
164
A)
THE
PRINCIPLES
OF
STRICT
CONSTRUCTION
AND
IN
DUBIO
PRO
REO
..........
165
B)
IS
THE
PREVAILING
INTERPRETATION
OF
ART.
25(3)
ICCST
IN
CONFLICT
WITH
THE
PRINCIPLE
OF
LEGALITY?
........................................................
167
5.
CONCLUSION
...........................................................................................
168
D.
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
IN
DOMESTIC
JURIS
DICTIONS
............................................................................................................
172
I.
GENERAL
REMARKS
.......................................................................................
172
1.
ARGENTINA
.............................................................................................
173
2.
GERMANY
...............................................................................................
177
3.
CHILE
.....................................................................................................
179
4.
PERU
.......................................................................................................
180
A)
THE
ABIMAEL GUZMAN
REYNOSO
ET
AL.
CASE
....................................
180
B) THE
FUJIMORI
CASE
..........................................................................
184
5.
COLOMBIA
.............................................................................................
190
II.
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
ON
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERR
SCHAFTSLEHRE
........................................................................................
192
1.
GENERAL
OBSERVATIONS
...........................................................................
192
2.
EVIDENTIARY
ISSUES
.................................................................................
194
III.
CONCLUSION
.................................................................................................
196
E.
AN
ITALIAN
APPROACH
TO
ART.
25(3)(A),
THIRD
ALTERNATIVE,
ICCST
..............
201
I.
THE
PROSECUTION
AND
PUNISHMENT
OF
LEADERS
IN
COLLECTIVE
CONTEXTS
IN
THE
ITALIAN
LEGAL
SYSTEM
............................................................................
201
1.
THE
ITALIAN
UNITARIAN
MODEL
OF
PARTICIPATION
IN
A
CRIME:
ORIGIN
AND
NORMATIVE
CONTEXT
.................................................................................
202
2.
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
IN
THE
ITALIAN
LEGAL
SYSTEM
................................
207
12
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
3.
MORAL
PARTICIPATION
...............................................................................
210
A)
THE
CAUSAL
CONTRIBUTION
TO
THE
CRIME
.............................................
211
B)
THE
MENTAL
ELEMENT
.......................................................................
212
C)
EVIDENTIARY
ISSUES
...........................................................................
214
4.
THE
ITALIAN
CASE
LAW
AND
ITS
DEVELOPMENT
...........................................
215
A)
THE
JUDGMENT
OF
THE
JOINT
CHAMBERS
OF
THE
COURT
OF
CASSATION
IN
THE
KOFLER
CASE:
A
MILESTONE
DECISION
...........................................
216
B)
THE
PERIOD
OF
THE
TERRORIST
EMERGENCY
...........................................
216
AA)
THE
ALUNNI
AND
FORMAZIONI
COMUNISTE
COMBATTENTI
CASE
.
.
217
BB)
THE
TRIALS
AGAINST
THE
RED
BRIGADES
.......................................
219
CC)
SUBSEQUENT
CASE
LAW:
IN
PARTICULAR,
THE
MARINO
ET
AL.
CASE
..
221
C)
THE
MAFIA
TRIALS
.............................................................................
222
AA)
THE
ABBATE
ET
AL.
CASE
.............................................................
222
BB)
THE
MADONIA
ET
AL.
CASE
.........................................................
225
CC)
SUBSEQUENT
CASE
LAW
...............................................................
226
D)
THE
CRIMES
COMMITTED
IN
MACRO-CRIMINAL
CONTEXTS
......................
228
AA)
THE
ASTIZ
ET
AL.
CASE
...............................................................
228
BB)
THE
ARCE
GOMEZ
ET
AL.
CASE
(THE
CONDOR
CASE)
....................
230
E)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
...............................................................
237
II.
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASE
AND
THE
ITALIAN
LEGAL
SYSTEM
..............
241
F.
CONCLUSION
...............................................................................................................
245
BIBLIOGRAPHY
.................................................................................................................
250
TABLE
OF
CASES
...............................................................................................................
274
INDEX
..............................................................................................................................
281
|
| adam_txt |
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
A.
INTRODUCTION
.
17
I.
THE
PROBLEM
.
17
II.
OBJECTIVE
OF
THE
INVESTIGATION
.
20
III.
METHODOLOGY
.
21
IV.
TERMINOLOGY
.
23
B.
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
.
27
I.
CONTEXT
AND
ORIGIN
.
27
II.
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
AS
AN
AUTONOMOUS
FORM
OF
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
.
32
1.
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS
.
32
2.
THE
CONSTITUTIVE
ELEMENTS
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
.
35
A)
THE
EXISTENCE
OF
A
HIERARCHICAL
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
AND
THE
COMMAND
AUTHORITY
OF
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
.
35
AA)
THE
EXISTENCE
OF
A
HIERARCHICAL
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
.
35
BB)
THE
COMMAND
AUTHORITY
OF
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
.
37
B)
THE
DETACHMENT
OF
THE
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
FROM
THE
LAW
.
41
C)
THE
FUNGIBILITY
OF
THE
DIRECT
PERPETRATORS
.
43
D)
THE
DIRECT
PERPETRATOR
'
S
DISPOSITION
TO
COMMIT
THE
ACT
.
46
3.
THE
DEFINITION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
ACCORDING
TO
ROXIN
.
49
III.
ALTERNATIVE
SOLUTIONS
TO
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
.
50
1.
CO-PERPETRATION
.
50
2.
INSTIGATION
.
52
C.
TOWARDS
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
AT
THE
ICC
.
55
I.
THE
PREMISES
OF
THE
ADOPTION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
AT
THE
ICC
.
55
1.
THE
CODIFICATION
OF
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
IN
ART.
25(3)(A),
THIRD
ALTER
NATIVE,
ICCST
.
55
2.
DOES
ART.
25(3)
ICCST
PROVIDE
FOR
A
DIFFERENTIATED
PARTICIPATION
MODEL?
.
59
A)
GENERAL
REMARKS
ON
THE
NORMATIVE
CONTEXT
OF
INDIRECT
PERPETRA
TION
WITHIN
THE
MEANING
OF
ART.
25(3)(A)
ICCST
.
59
B)
THE
DOMINANT
APPROACH
.
65
C)
THE
MINORITY
APPROACH
.
69
D)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
.
72
10
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
3.
THE
ADOPTION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
CRIME
THEORY
AS
A
CRITERION
TO
DISTINGUISH
PRINCIPALS
FROM
ACCESSORIES
TO
A
CRIME
.
76
A)
A
PECULIAR
DEMAND
OF
THE
DIFFERENTIATED
PARTICIPATION
MODELS
.
76
B) THE
DOMINANT
APPROACH
.
81
AA)
THE
LUBANGA
CASE
.
81
BB)
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASES
.
84
C)
THE
MINORITY
APPROACH
.
86
AA)
THE
LUBANGA
CASE
.
86
BB)
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASES
.
87
D)
CONFLICTING
APPROACHES:
THE
DOMINANT
APPROACH
V.
THE
MINORITY
APPROACH
.
88
E)
THE
NORMATIVE
APPROACH
V.
THE
NATURALISTIC
APPROACH
.
89
F)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
.
92
II.
THE
INTERPRETATION
AND
APPLICATION
OF
ART.
25(3)(A),
THIRD
ALTERNATIVE,
ICCST
.
94
1.
THE
APPEARANCE
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
IN
ICL:
A
FEEBLE
AND
UNCERTAIN
ATTEMPT
(THE
AD
HOC
TRIBUNALS)
.
95
A)
ICTY:
THE
STAKIC
CASE
AND
THE
MILUTINOVIC
ET
AL.
CASE
.
95
B)
ICTR:
JUDGE
SCHOMBURG
'
S
SEPARATE
OPINION
APPENDED
TO
THE
GACUMBITSI
APPEALS
JUDGMENT
.
98
C)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
.
100
2.
THE
INTRODUCTION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
IN
THE
CASE
LAW
OF
THE
ICC
.
101
A)
THE
LUBANGA
CASE
.
103
B)
THE
BEMBA
CASE
.
104
C)
THE
AL
BASHIR
CASE
.
105
D) THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASES
.
108
AA)
FACTUAL
BACKGROUND
AND
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
.
108
BB)
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CONFIRMATION
OF
CHARGES
DECISION
110
CC)
THE
NGUDJOLO
TRIAL
JUDGMENT
.
114
DD)
THE
KATANGA
TRIAL
JUDGMENT
.
115
E)
THE
GADDAFI
CASE
.
118
F)
THE
MUTHAURA,
KENYATTA
AND
ALI
CASE
AND
THE
RUTO,
KOSGEY
AND
SANG
CASE
(THE
KENYA
CASES)
.
121
G)
THE
NTAGANDA
CASE
.
127
H) THE
AL
HASSAN
CASE
.
131
3.
ART.
25(3)
ICCST
IN
LIGHT
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
.
132
A)
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY:
INDIRECT
CO-PERPETRATION
AND
JOINT
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
.
132
B)
THE
ELEMENTS
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY:
IN
SEARCH
OF
A
DEFINITION
.
136
AA)
THE
EXISTENCE
OF
AN
ORGANISED
AND
HIERARCHICAL
APPARATUS
OF
POWER
.
138
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
11
BB)
THE
COMMISSION
OF
THE
CRIMES
MUST
BE
SECURED
BY
ALMOST
AUTOMATIC
COMPLIANCE
WITH
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
'
S
ORDERS
.
139
CC)
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
'
S
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
.
141
DD)
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
'
S
FULFILMENT
OF
THE
SUBJECTIVE
ELE
MENTS
OF
THE
CRIMES,
INCLUDING
ANY
REQUIRED
ADDITIONAL
INTENT
143
EE)
THE
INDIRECT
PERPETRATOR
'
S
AWARENESS
OF
THE
FACTUAL
CIRCUM
STANCES
ENABLING
HIM
OR
HER
TO
EXERCISE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
CRIME
THROUGH
THE
ORGANISATION
.
143
C)
A
DEFINITION
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
THE
CASE
LAW
.
144
4.
CRITICAL
OBSERVATIONS
AND
OPEN
QUESTIONS
.
144
III.
THE
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
149
1.
THE
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS
OF
THE
CONTROL
OVER
THE
ORGANISATION
THEORY
ACCORDING
TO
THE
CASE
LAW
OF
THE
ICC
.
150
2.
ART.
21
ICCST
AND
THE
SOURCES
OF
LAW
REGIME
PROVIDED
BY
THE
ROME
STATUTE
.
157
3.
THE
VIENNA
CONVENTION
ON
THE
LAW
OF
TREATIES
(VCLT)
.
161
4.
THE
PRINCIPLE
OF
LEGALITY
.
164
A)
THE
PRINCIPLES
OF
STRICT
CONSTRUCTION
AND
IN
DUBIO
PRO
REO
.
165
B)
IS
THE
PREVAILING
INTERPRETATION
OF
ART.
25(3)
ICCST
IN
CONFLICT
WITH
THE
PRINCIPLE
OF
LEGALITY?
.
167
5.
CONCLUSION
.
168
D.
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERRSCHAFTSLEHRE
IN
DOMESTIC
JURIS
DICTIONS
.
172
I.
GENERAL
REMARKS
.
172
1.
ARGENTINA
.
173
2.
GERMANY
.
177
3.
CHILE
.
179
4.
PERU
.
180
A)
THE
ABIMAEL GUZMAN
REYNOSO
ET
AL.
CASE
.
180
B) THE
FUJIMORI
CASE
.
184
5.
COLOMBIA
.
190
II.
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
ON
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
ORGANISATIONSHERR
SCHAFTSLEHRE
.
192
1.
GENERAL
OBSERVATIONS
.
192
2.
EVIDENTIARY
ISSUES
.
194
III.
CONCLUSION
.
196
E.
AN
ITALIAN
APPROACH
TO
ART.
25(3)(A),
THIRD
ALTERNATIVE,
ICCST
.
201
I.
THE
PROSECUTION
AND
PUNISHMENT
OF
LEADERS
IN
COLLECTIVE
CONTEXTS
IN
THE
ITALIAN
LEGAL
SYSTEM
.
201
1.
THE
ITALIAN
UNITARIAN
MODEL
OF
PARTICIPATION
IN
A
CRIME:
ORIGIN
AND
NORMATIVE
CONTEXT
.
202
2.
INDIRECT
PERPETRATION
IN
THE
ITALIAN
LEGAL
SYSTEM
.
207
12
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
3.
MORAL
PARTICIPATION
.
210
A)
THE
CAUSAL
CONTRIBUTION
TO
THE
CRIME
.
211
B)
THE
MENTAL
ELEMENT
.
212
C)
EVIDENTIARY
ISSUES
.
214
4.
THE
ITALIAN
CASE
LAW
AND
ITS
DEVELOPMENT
.
215
A)
THE
JUDGMENT
OF
THE
JOINT
CHAMBERS
OF
THE
COURT
OF
CASSATION
IN
THE
KOFLER
CASE:
A
MILESTONE
DECISION
.
216
B)
THE
PERIOD
OF
THE
TERRORIST
EMERGENCY
.
216
AA)
THE
ALUNNI
AND
FORMAZIONI
COMUNISTE
COMBATTENTI
CASE
.
.
217
BB)
THE
TRIALS
AGAINST
THE
RED
BRIGADES
.
219
CC)
SUBSEQUENT
CASE
LAW:
IN
PARTICULAR,
THE
MARINO
ET
AL.
CASE
.
221
C)
THE
MAFIA
TRIALS
.
222
AA)
THE
ABBATE
ET
AL.
CASE
.
222
BB)
THE
MADONIA
ET
AL.
CASE
.
225
CC)
SUBSEQUENT
CASE
LAW
.
226
D)
THE
CRIMES
COMMITTED
IN
MACRO-CRIMINAL
CONTEXTS
.
228
AA)
THE
ASTIZ
ET
AL.
CASE
.
228
BB)
THE
ARCE
GOMEZ
ET
AL.
CASE
(THE
CONDOR
CASE)
.
230
E)
CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS
.
237
II.
THE
KATANGA
AND
NGUDJOLO
CASE
AND
THE
ITALIAN
LEGAL
SYSTEM
.
241
F.
CONCLUSION
.
245
BIBLIOGRAPHY
.
250
TABLE
OF
CASES
.
274
INDEX
.
281 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Lanza, Giulia |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1241058059 |
| author_facet | Lanza, Giulia |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lanza, Giulia |
| author_variant | g l gl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047451584 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2210 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1260846418 (DE-599)DNB1237120667 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03365nam a22006978cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047451584</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211112 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210902s2021 gw m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">21,N29</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1237120667</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783428183593</subfield><subfield code="c">Paperback: EUR 89.90 (DE), EUR 92.50 (AT)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-428-18359-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3428183592</subfield><subfield code="9">3-428-18359-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783428183593</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Bestellnummer: 18359</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1260846418</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1237120667</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-BE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2210</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139529:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="2">23sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lanza, Giulia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1241058059</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre</subfield><subfield code="b">an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime</subfield><subfield code="c">by Giulia Lanza</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b">Duncker & Humblot</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">286 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">23.3 cm x 15.7 cm, 418 g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure</subfield><subfield code="v">Band/Volume 48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Georg-August-Universität Göttingen</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Strafgerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)3042935-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafrechtsdogmatik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4336721-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tatherrschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4227897-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Teilnahme</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4059331-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124385-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Italien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027833-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Indirect Perpetration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International Criminal Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Organisationsherrschaftslehre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Italien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027833-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Tatherrschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4227897-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Strafrechtsdogmatik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4336721-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Strafgerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)3042935-3</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Teilnahme</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4059331-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124385-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duncker & Humblot</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5082687-6</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-428-58359-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure</subfield><subfield code="v">Band/Volume 48</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV048552805</subfield><subfield code="9">48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032853569&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032853569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">vlb</subfield><subfield code="d">20210716</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| geographic | Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd Italien (DE-588)4027833-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Deutschland Italien |
| id | DE-604.BV047451584 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:03:28Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:12:31Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)5082687-6 |
| isbn | 9783428183593 3428183592 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032853569 |
| oclc_num | 1260846418 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 286 Seiten 23.3 cm x 15.7 cm, 418 g |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Duncker & Humblot |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure |
| series2 | Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure |
| spelling | Lanza, Giulia Verfasser (DE-588)1241058059 aut Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime by Giulia Lanza Berlin Duncker & Humblot [2021] © 2021 286 Seiten 23.3 cm x 15.7 cm, 418 g txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure Band/Volume 48 Dissertation Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 2018 Internationaler Strafgerichtshof (DE-588)3042935-3 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Strafrechtsdogmatik (DE-588)4336721-5 gnd rswk-swf Tatherrschaft (DE-588)4227897-1 gnd rswk-swf Teilnahme (DE-588)4059331-9 gnd rswk-swf Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit (DE-588)4124385-7 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf Italien (DE-588)4027833-5 gnd rswk-swf Indirect Perpetration International Criminal Court Organisationsherrschaftslehre (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g Italien (DE-588)4027833-5 g Tatherrschaft (DE-588)4227897-1 s Strafrechtsdogmatik (DE-588)4336721-5 s Internationaler Strafgerichtshof (DE-588)3042935-3 b Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Teilnahme (DE-588)4059331-9 s Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit (DE-588)4124385-7 s DE-604 Duncker & Humblot (DE-588)5082687-6 pbl Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-3-428-58359-1 Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure Band/Volume 48 (DE-604)BV048552805 48 DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032853569&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p vlb 20210716 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb |
| spellingShingle | Lanza, Giulia Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime Beiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure Internationaler Strafgerichtshof (DE-588)3042935-3 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Strafrechtsdogmatik (DE-588)4336721-5 gnd Tatherrschaft (DE-588)4227897-1 gnd Teilnahme (DE-588)4059331-9 gnd Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit (DE-588)4124385-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)3042935-3 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4336721-5 (DE-588)4227897-1 (DE-588)4059331-9 (DE-588)4124385-7 (DE-588)4011882-4 (DE-588)4027833-5 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |
| title_auth | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |
| title_exact_search | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |
| title_full | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime by Giulia Lanza |
| title_fullStr | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime by Giulia Lanza |
| title_full_unstemmed | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime by Giulia Lanza |
| title_short | Indirect perpetration and Organisationsherrschaftslehre |
| title_sort | indirect perpetration and organisationsherrschaftslehre an analysis of article 25 3 of the rome statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |
| title_sub | an analysis of article 25(3) of the Rome Statute in light of the german differentiated and italian unitarian models of participation in a crime |
| topic | Internationaler Strafgerichtshof (DE-588)3042935-3 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Strafrechtsdogmatik (DE-588)4336721-5 gnd Tatherrschaft (DE-588)4227897-1 gnd Teilnahme (DE-588)4059331-9 gnd Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit (DE-588)4124385-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Internationaler Strafgerichtshof Rechtsprechung Strafrechtsdogmatik Tatherrschaft Teilnahme Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit Deutschland Italien Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032853569&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV048552805 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lanzagiulia indirectperpetrationandorganisationsherrschaftslehreananalysisofarticle253oftheromestatuteinlightofthegermandifferentiatedanditalianunitarianmodelsofparticipationinacrime AT dunckerhumblot indirectperpetrationandorganisationsherrschaftslehreananalysisofarticle253oftheromestatuteinlightofthegermandifferentiatedanditalianunitarianmodelsofparticipationinacrime |