The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brussels [Belgium]
CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The European Investigation Order (EIO) seeks to establish a complete system for obtaining evidence in crossborder cases. It represents a further step in the evolution of the mutual recognition agenda and the deepening of criminal cooperation among member states. It has far-reaching implications for individual rights because of its breadth, its application to individuals who are not suspects and the nature of its invasive provisions. Careful justification is required to ensure legitimacy. In analysing this proposal, this paper considers the following aspects:• the place of the EIO within the mutual recognition programme. It looks at judicial cooperation by way of mutual recognition and the common characteristics shared by such measures. It explores the lessons arising from experience with mutual recognition (specifically the European Arrest Warrant, EAW) and the need for mutual trust; and • the scope of the EIO – what is it and what does it replace? The paper investigates the EIO’s potential scope and application. It asks whether it is really a measure of judicial cooperation and assesses how the EIO departs from existing measures on mutual recognition. It also asks the question, does the EIO go too far? Furthermore, what are the ramifications for human rights? The paper analyses the sufficiency of the safeguards in the EIO. It explores whether the lessons from the EAW have been learnt, e.g. the need for proportionality and the effect of inconsistency in the implementation of human rights standards. It considers whether the Road map for Strengthening Procedural Safe guards will assist and takes into account the views of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 28) |
| ISBN: | 9789461381149 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047450773 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210902s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789461381149 |9 978-94-6138-114-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol834221 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1268189744 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047450773 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sayers, Debbie |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ |c Debbie Sayers |
| 264 | 1 | |a Brussels [Belgium] |b CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |c 2011 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 28) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The European Investigation Order (EIO) seeks to establish a complete system for obtaining evidence in crossborder cases. It represents a further step in the evolution of the mutual recognition agenda and the deepening of criminal cooperation among member states. It has far-reaching implications for individual rights because of its breadth, its application to individuals who are not suspects and the nature of its invasive provisions. Careful justification is required to ensure legitimacy. In analysing this proposal, this paper considers the following aspects:• the place of the EIO within the mutual recognition programme. It looks at judicial cooperation by way of mutual recognition and the common characteristics shared by such measures. It explores the lessons arising from experience with mutual recognition (specifically the European Arrest Warrant, EAW) and the need for mutual trust; and • the scope of the EIO – what is it and what does it replace? The paper investigates the EIO’s potential scope and application. It asks whether it is really a measure of judicial cooperation and assesses how the EIO departs from existing measures on mutual recognition. It also asks the question, does the EIO go too far? Furthermore, what are the ramifications for human rights? The paper analyses the sufficiency of the safeguards in the EIO. It explores whether the lessons from the EAW have been learnt, e.g. the need for proportionality and the effect of inconsistency in the implementation of human rights standards. It considers whether the Road map for Strengthening Procedural Safe guards will assist and takes into account the views of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security and defense | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852771 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=834221 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182749396860928 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Sayers, Debbie |
| author_facet | Sayers, Debbie |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Sayers, Debbie |
| author_variant | d s ds |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047450773 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol834221 (OCoLC)1268189744 (DE-599)BVBBV047450773 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03090nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047450773</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210902s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789461381149</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-6138-114-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol834221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1268189744</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047450773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sayers, Debbie</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’</subfield><subfield code="c">Debbie Sayers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brussels [Belgium]</subfield><subfield code="b">CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 28)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The European Investigation Order (EIO) seeks to establish a complete system for obtaining evidence in crossborder cases. It represents a further step in the evolution of the mutual recognition agenda and the deepening of criminal cooperation among member states. It has far-reaching implications for individual rights because of its breadth, its application to individuals who are not suspects and the nature of its invasive provisions. Careful justification is required to ensure legitimacy. In analysing this proposal, this paper considers the following aspects:• the place of the EIO within the mutual recognition programme. It looks at judicial cooperation by way of mutual recognition and the common characteristics shared by such measures. It explores the lessons arising from experience with mutual recognition (specifically the European Arrest Warrant, EAW) and the need for mutual trust; and • the scope of the EIO – what is it and what does it replace? The paper investigates the EIO’s potential scope and application. It asks whether it is really a measure of judicial cooperation and assesses how the EIO departs from existing measures on mutual recognition. It also asks the question, does the EIO go too far? Furthermore, what are the ramifications for human rights? The paper analyses the sufficiency of the safeguards in the EIO. It explores whether the lessons from the EAW have been learnt, e.g. the need for proportionality and the effect of inconsistency in the implementation of human rights standards. It considers whether the Road map for Strengthening Procedural Safe guards will assist and takes into account the views of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security and defense</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852771</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=834221</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047450773 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:03:13Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:12:30Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789461381149 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852771 |
| oclc_num | 1268189744 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 28) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Sayers, Debbie Verfasser aut The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ Debbie Sayers Brussels [Belgium] CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies 2011 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2011 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 28) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The European Investigation Order (EIO) seeks to establish a complete system for obtaining evidence in crossborder cases. It represents a further step in the evolution of the mutual recognition agenda and the deepening of criminal cooperation among member states. It has far-reaching implications for individual rights because of its breadth, its application to individuals who are not suspects and the nature of its invasive provisions. Careful justification is required to ensure legitimacy. In analysing this proposal, this paper considers the following aspects:• the place of the EIO within the mutual recognition programme. It looks at judicial cooperation by way of mutual recognition and the common characteristics shared by such measures. It explores the lessons arising from experience with mutual recognition (specifically the European Arrest Warrant, EAW) and the need for mutual trust; and • the scope of the EIO – what is it and what does it replace? The paper investigates the EIO’s potential scope and application. It asks whether it is really a measure of judicial cooperation and assesses how the EIO departs from existing measures on mutual recognition. It also asks the question, does the EIO go too far? Furthermore, what are the ramifications for human rights? The paper analyses the sufficiency of the safeguards in the EIO. It explores whether the lessons from the EAW have been learnt, e.g. the need for proportionality and the effect of inconsistency in the implementation of human rights standards. It considers whether the Road map for Strengthening Procedural Safe guards will assist and takes into account the views of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor Criminal Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
| spellingShingle | Sayers, Debbie The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ Criminal Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| title | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ |
| title_auth | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ |
| title_exact_search | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ |
| title_full | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ Debbie Sayers |
| title_fullStr | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ Debbie Sayers |
| title_full_unstemmed | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ Debbie Sayers |
| title_short | The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’ |
| title_sort | the european investigation order travelling without a roadmap |
| topic | Criminal Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| topic_facet | Criminal Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sayersdebbie theeuropeaninvestigationordertravellingwithoutaroadmap AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary theeuropeaninvestigationordertravellingwithoutaroadmap |