QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds?:
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Brussels [Belgium]
CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies
2019
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The asset purchase programme of the euro area, active between 2015 and 2018, constitutes an interesting special case of Quantitative Easing (QE) because the ECB’s Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) involved the purchase of peripheral euro area government bonds, which were clearly not riskless. Moreover, these purchases were undertaken by national central banks at their own risk. Intuition suggests, and a simple model confirms, that, ceteris paribus, large purchases by a national central bank of the bonds of their own sovereign should increase the risk for the remaining private bond holders. This might seem incompatible with the observationthat risk spreads on peripheral bonds fell when QE in the euro area was announced. However, the initial fall in risk premiums may have been due to expectations of the bond purchases proving effective in lowering risk-free rates. When these expectations were disappointed, risk premiums returned to their initial level. Formal statistical tests confirm that indeed risk premiums on peripheral bonds did not follow a random walk (contrary to what is assumed inevent studies). Nor did the announcements of bond buying change the stochastics of these premiums. There is thus no reason to consider the impact effect to have been permanent |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 27) |
ISBN: | 9789461387202 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047450703 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210902s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789461387202 |9 978-94-6138-720-2 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol833254 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1268192848 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047450703 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Belke, Ansgar |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
264 | 1 | |a Brussels [Belgium] |b CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |c 2019 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 27) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The asset purchase programme of the euro area, active between 2015 and 2018, constitutes an interesting special case of Quantitative Easing (QE) because the ECB’s Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) involved the purchase of peripheral euro area government bonds, which were clearly not riskless. Moreover, these purchases were undertaken by national central banks at their own risk. Intuition suggests, and a simple model confirms, that, ceteris paribus, large purchases by a national central bank of the bonds of their own sovereign should increase the risk for the remaining private bond holders. This might seem incompatible with the observationthat risk spreads on peripheral bonds fell when QE in the euro area was announced. However, the initial fall in risk premiums may have been due to expectations of the bond purchases proving effective in lowering risk-free rates. When these expectations were disappointed, risk premiums returned to their initial level. Formal statistical tests confirm that indeed risk premiums on peripheral bonds did not follow a random walk (contrary to what is assumed inevent studies). Nor did the announcements of bond buying change the stochastics of these premiums. There is thus no reason to consider the impact effect to have been permanent | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
650 | 4 | |a Government/Political systems | |
650 | 4 | |a Present Times (2010 - today) | |
650 | 4 | |a Financial Markets | |
700 | 1 | |a Gros, Daniel |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852701 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=833254 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182749220700160 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Belke, Ansgar Gros, Daniel |
author_facet | Belke, Ansgar Gros, Daniel |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Belke, Ansgar |
author_variant | a b ab d g dg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047450703 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol833254 (OCoLC)1268192848 (DE-599)BVBBV047450703 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02612nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047450703</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210902s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789461387202</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-6138-720-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol833254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1268192848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047450703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Belke, Ansgar</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brussels [Belgium]</subfield><subfield code="b">CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 27)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The asset purchase programme of the euro area, active between 2015 and 2018, constitutes an interesting special case of Quantitative Easing (QE) because the ECB’s Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) involved the purchase of peripheral euro area government bonds, which were clearly not riskless. Moreover, these purchases were undertaken by national central banks at their own risk. Intuition suggests, and a simple model confirms, that, ceteris paribus, large purchases by a national central bank of the bonds of their own sovereign should increase the risk for the remaining private bond holders. This might seem incompatible with the observationthat risk spreads on peripheral bonds fell when QE in the euro area was announced. However, the initial fall in risk premiums may have been due to expectations of the bond purchases proving effective in lowering risk-free rates. When these expectations were disappointed, risk premiums returned to their initial level. Formal statistical tests confirm that indeed risk premiums on peripheral bonds did not follow a random walk (contrary to what is assumed inevent studies). Nor did the announcements of bond buying change the stochastics of these premiums. There is thus no reason to consider the impact effect to have been permanent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government/Political systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Present Times (2010 - today)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Financial Markets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gros, Daniel</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852701</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=833254</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047450703 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T18:03:13Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:12:29Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789461387202 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852701 |
oclc_num | 1268192848 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 27) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Belke, Ansgar Verfasser aut QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? Brussels [Belgium] CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 27) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The asset purchase programme of the euro area, active between 2015 and 2018, constitutes an interesting special case of Quantitative Easing (QE) because the ECB’s Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) involved the purchase of peripheral euro area government bonds, which were clearly not riskless. Moreover, these purchases were undertaken by national central banks at their own risk. Intuition suggests, and a simple model confirms, that, ceteris paribus, large purchases by a national central bank of the bonds of their own sovereign should increase the risk for the remaining private bond holders. This might seem incompatible with the observationthat risk spreads on peripheral bonds fell when QE in the euro area was announced. However, the initial fall in risk premiums may have been due to expectations of the bond purchases proving effective in lowering risk-free rates. When these expectations were disappointed, risk premiums returned to their initial level. Formal statistical tests confirm that indeed risk premiums on peripheral bonds did not follow a random walk (contrary to what is assumed inevent studies). Nor did the announcements of bond buying change the stochastics of these premiums. There is thus no reason to consider the impact effect to have been permanent Economic policy Government/Political systems Present Times (2010 - today) Financial Markets Gros, Daniel Verfasser aut Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Belke, Ansgar Gros, Daniel QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? Economic policy Government/Political systems Present Times (2010 - today) Financial Markets |
title | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_auth | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_exact_search | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_exact_search_txtP | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_full | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_fullStr | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_full_unstemmed | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_short | QE in the euro area, has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds? |
title_sort | qe in the euro area has the pspp benefited peripheral bonds |
topic | Economic policy Government/Political systems Present Times (2010 - today) Financial Markets |
topic_facet | Economic policy Government/Political systems Present Times (2010 - today) Financial Markets |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belkeansgar qeintheeuroareahasthepsppbenefitedperipheralbonds AT grosdaniel qeintheeuroareahasthepsppbenefitedperipheralbonds AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary qeintheeuroareahasthepsppbenefitedperipheralbonds |