Diskurs parlamenta:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Podgorica
Univerzitet Crne Gore
2020.
|
| Ausgabe: | Prvo izdanje |
| Schriftenreihe: | Biblioteka humanističkih nauka
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Tiraž 300. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 267-285 |
| Beschreibung: | 285 Seiten Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9788676641864 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047440178 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20211221 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210826s2020 yu a||| |||| 00||| cnr d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788676641864 |9 978-86-7664-186-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1289777807 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047440178 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a cnr | |
| 044 | |a yu |c XA-ME | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vuković Stamatović, Milica |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diskurs parlamenta |c Milica Vuković Stamatović |
| 250 | |a Prvo izdanje | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Podgorica |b Univerzitet Crne Gore |c 2020. | |
| 300 | |a 285 Seiten |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Biblioteka humanističkih nauka | |
| 500 | |a Tiraž 300. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 267-285 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Parlament |0 (DE-588)4044685-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Debatte |0 (DE-588)4148952-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Rede |0 (DE-588)4046554-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Diskursanalyse |0 (DE-588)4194747-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Montenegro |0 (DE-588)4040163-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Montenegro |0 (DE-588)4040163-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Parlament |0 (DE-588)4044685-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Politische Rede |0 (DE-588)4046554-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Debatte |0 (DE-588)4148952-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Diskursanalyse |0 (DE-588)4194747-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20211221 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032842364 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 49745 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 41 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 417.7 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 49745 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 417.7 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 49745 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182732080676864 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Sadržaj: uvod....................................................................................................................... 7 ANALIZA DİSKURSA......................................................................................... 11 Pojam analize diskursa....................................................................................... 11 Diskurs................................................................................................................12 Tekst................................................................................................................... 14 Žanr.................................................................................................................... 15 Istorija analize diskursa...................................................................................... 17 Pravci u analizi diskursa.....................................................................................23 Kritički osvrt na analizu diskursa.......................................................................25 KRITIČKA ANALIZA DİSKURSA...................................................................26 Definicija kritičke analize diskursa....................................................................26 Istorijski razvoj kritičke analize diskursa...........................................................27 Osnovni analitički pojmovi i nivoi analize u kritičkoj analizi diskursa.............28 Metodologija kritičke analize diskursa.............................................................. 30 Norman Ferklaf: socijalna teorija
diskursa........................................................ 30 Term van Dajk: sociokognitivni metod.............................................................. 31 Rut Vodak: socioistorijski metod....................................................................... 33 Kritički osvrt na kritičku analizu diskursa......................................................... 35 KORPUSNA LINGVISTIKA.............................................................................. 38 Pojam korpusna lingvistika................................................................................ 38 Istorijski razvoj korpusne lingvistike................................................................. 39 Metode korpusne lingvistike.............................................................................. 40 Liste riječi........................................................................................................... 40 Konkordance...................................................................................................... 41 Obilježavanje morfoloških kategorija................................................................42 Kritički osvrt na korpusnu lingvistiku................................................................44 ANALIZA POLITIČKOG DİSKURSA.............................................................46 Definicija političkog diskursa............................................................................ 46 Istorija izučavanja političkog diskursa............................................................... 47 Politički diskurs i politička
kognicija................................................................. 49 Karakteristike političkog diskursa...................................................................... 49 Leksika političkog diskursa................................................................................ 50 Stås : söi Ы iothek München
Gramatika političkog diskursa.................................................................... 53 Pragmatika političkog diskursa.......................................................................... 58 Retorika političkog diskursa.............................................................................. 62 Makrostrategije.................................................................................................. 68 Žanrovi političkog diskursa................................................................................ 69 DISKURS PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA...................................................... 71 Diskurs parlamenta............................................................................................. 71 Parlamentarna debata kao žanr...........................................................................73 Institucionalne specifičnosti parlamentarnih debata.......................................... 74 Fonografski zapisi sjednice................................................................................79 Dosadašnja istraživanja diskursa parlamentarnih debata...................................79 POLARIZACIJA U DISKURSU PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA................ 81 1. Polarizacija u crnogorskom parlamentu.........................................................82 1.1. Polarizacija điskursnih učesnika u crnogorskom parlamentu................. 82 1.2. Polarizacija sadržaja.............................................................................. 108 1.3. Rezime i
zaključci................................................................................. 115 2. Polarizacija u britanskom parlamentu.......................................................... 118 2.1. Polarizacija điskursnih učesnika............................................................118 2.2. Polarizacija sadržaja.............................................................................. 136 2.3. Rezime i zaključci................................................................................. 142 3. Kontrastivna analiza polarizacije u crnogorskom i britanskom parlamentu....144 POJAČAVANJE ISKAZA U DISKURSU PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA......148 1. Pojačavanje iskaza u crnogorskom parlamentu........................................... 149 1.1. Jaka epistemička modalnost.................................................................. 150 1.2. Jaka deontička modalnost...................................................................... 160 1.3. Prilozi amplifikatori............................................................................... 162 1.4. Pridjevi intenzifikatori........................................................................... 163 1.5. Metakomenari za pojačavanje iskaza.................................................... 167 1.6. Rezime................................................................................................... 167 2. Pojačavanje iskaza u britanskom parlamentu............................................... 168 2.1. Jaka epistemička modalnost.................................................................. 168 2.2. Jaka
deontička modalnost...................................................................... 177 2.3. Prilozi amplifikatori............................................................................... 180 2.4. Pridjevi intenzifikatori........................................................................... 183 2.5. Metakomenari za pojačavanje iskaza.................................................... 186 2.6. Rezime................................................................................................... 187 3. Konstrastivna analiza pojačavanja iskaza.................................................... 187 UBLAŽAVANJE ISKAZA U PARLAMENTARNIM DEBATAMA.............. 191 1. Ublažavanje iskaza u crnogorskom parlamentu........................................... 192 1.1. Slaba epistemička modalnost................................................................ 192 2.1. Slaba deontička modalnost.................................................................... 201 2.2. Prilozi ublaživači................................................................................... 205 2.3. Pridjevi ublaživači................................................................................. 210 2.4. Metakomentari za ublažavanje.............................................................. 211 /■ li
2.5. Rezime...................................................................................................211 2. Ublažavanje iskaza u britanskom parlamentu.............................................. 212 2.1. Slaba epistemička modalnost................................................................212 2.2. Slaba deontička modalnost....................................................................219 2.3. Prilozi ublaživači...................................................................................221 2.4. Pridjevi ublaživači.................................................................................224 2.5. Metakomentari za ublažavanje..............................................................225 2.6. Rezime...................................................................................................226 3. Kontrastivna analiza ublažavanja iskaza......................................................227 REKONTEKSTUALIZACIJA U DISKURSU PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA...... 231 1. Rekontekstualizacija u crnogorskom parlamentu........................................232 Rezime...................................................................................... 244 2. Rekontekstualizacija u britanskom parlamentu...........................................245 Rezime...........................................................................................................256 3. Konstrastivna analiza rekontekstualizacije..................................................257
ZAKLJUČAK...................................................................................................... 259 LITERATURA..................................................................................................... 267
LITERATURA Adetunji, A. (2006) “Inclusion and Exclusion in Political Discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches”, in Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5 (2), pp. 177-192. Ahmadvand, M. (2009) “Critical Discourse Analysis: An introduction to major approaches”. Retrived on 20.12.2009: www.iranianlinguistics.org/papers/CriticalDiscourseAnalysis.pdf Allen, W. (2007) “Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches”, in Mushin, I. and Laughren, M. Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society, Brisbane, Australia, 7-9 July, 2006. Retrieved on 2.1.2010: http://espace.library.uq.edu.aU/eserv/UQ:12794/ALLEN_W_ALS2006.pdf Anderson, L. (1986) “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries”, in Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 273-312. Archakis, A. and Tsakona, V. (2009) “Parliamentary Discourse in Newspaper Articles. The Intergration of a Critical Approach to Media Discourse into a Literacy-Ba sed Language Teaching Programme”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 8 (3), pp. 359-385. Archakis, A. and Tsakona, V. (2010) “’The Wolf Wakes up inside Them, Grows Warewolf Hair and Reveals All Their Bullying’: The Representation of Parlia mentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 912-923. Atkinson, M. (1984) Our Masters’ Voices, London and New York: Routeledge. Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: OUP. Bach, K. (1998) “Speech Acts”, in Craig, E. (ed.) Routledge
Encyclopedia of Phi losophy. Retrieved on 20.04.2008: http://online.sfsu.edu/~kbach/spchacts.html Bach, K. (2007) “Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Language”, in Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 463-487. Badurina, L. (2004) „Slojevi javnog diskursa“, u Obdobjima, 22, տէր. 151-164. Bakhtin, M. (1986) “The Problem of Speech Genres”, in Bakhtin, M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Texas: University of Austin. Bara, J. et al. (2007) “Deliberative Democracy and the Analysis of Parliamentary De bate”. Paper presented at the Workshop on ‘Advanced Empirical Study ofDeli261
beration’, Helsinki, 7-12 May, pp.1-47. Retrieved on 3.03.2010: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/helsinki/ws23/ weale.pdf Barker, C. and Galasinski, D. (2001) “Tools for Discourse Analysis”, in Barker, C. and Galasinski, D. Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 62-85. Bavelas, J. et al. (1988) “Political Equivocation: A Situation Explanation”, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Voi. 7 (2), pp. 137-145. Bayley, P. (ed.) (2004) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Bayley, P. (2004b) “The Whys and Wherefores ofAnalysing Parliamentary Discourse”, in Baytey, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-44. Bayley, P. et al. (2004c) “Threat and Fear in Parliamentary Debates in Britain, Ger many and Italy”, in in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Par liamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-236. Bayley, P. and San Vicente, F. (2004) “Ways of talking about work in parliamentary discourse in Britain and Spain” in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspecti ves on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 237-269. Bayley, P. (2005) “Analysing Language and Politics”, in Mediaszioni, 10.1473. Re trieved on 21.12.2009: http://www.mediazionionline.it/articoli/bayley.htm Beard, A. (2000) The Language of Politics, London and New York:
Routeledge. Bernstein, B. (1971) “Social Class, Language and Socialisation”, in Bernstein, B. Cla ss, Codes and Controle. Vol. I. London: Routeledge, pp. 59-67. Bevitori, C. (2004) “Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian parlia mentary debates”, in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Par liamentary Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins PC, pp. 87-109. Bhatia, V. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman. Bianchini, V. (2008) “Discussion in Parliament. History, Features and Variations”. Pa per presented at the Second ECPR Graduate Conference in Barcelona, 25-27 August, 2008. Retrieved on 1.9.2009: http ://www. essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/graduateconference/barcelona/papers/633 .pdf Biber, D. et al. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Lon don: Longman. Bijeikiené, V. and Utka, A. (2007) “Gender-related Linguistic Stereotypes in Lithua nian Parliamentary Discourse”, in Apanavičius, R. (ed.) Humanities in New Europe, 2, pp. 423^130. Billig, M. (2008) “The Language of Critical Discourse Analy sis: The Case of Nomina lisation”, in Discourse Society, 19 (6), pp. 783-800. Blackledge, A. (2005) Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Blagojević, S. (2009) „Expressing Attitudes in Academic Research Articles Written by 268
English and Serbian Authors”, in Facta Universitatis (Series: Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), pp. 63-73. Blakemore, D. (2007) “Discourse Markers”, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 220-240. Blommaert, J. (2005) “Theory and Methodology: Norman Fairclough”, in Blommaert, J. Discourse: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 28-31. Blommaert, J. (2005b) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Bonelli, E. T. (2010) “Theoretical Overview of the Evolution of Corpus Linguistics”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. The Routeledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Abington/New York: Routeledge, pp. 14-27. Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Translated by Nice, R. Stanford: Standford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (2006) “Language and Symbolic Power”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 473-480. Boyd, M. (2009) “De-constructing Race and Identity in US Presidential Discourse: Barack Obama’s Speech on Race”, in Atlantis, December 2009, pp. 75-74. Bratić, V. and Vukovič Stamatović, M. (2017) “Commodification of Women through Conceptual Metaphors: The Metaphor woman as a car in the Western Balkans”, in Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (ed.) Gender and Language, 11(1), pp. 51-76. Brekle, H. (1989) “War with Words”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 81-93. Brewer, N. (1987) Modality And Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of the English Modal Auxiliaries. PhD thesis.
Leeds: University of Leeds. Brizuela, M, Andersen, E. and Stallings, L. (1999) “Discourse Markers as Indicators of Register”, Hispánia, 82 (1), pp. 128-141. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (2006) “Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (ed.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 311-323. Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. Bugarski, R. (1995) Uvod u opštu lingvistiku. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastav na sredstva. Bull, P. (2003) The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Am biguity. New York: Routeldge. Bull, P. (2007) “Political Language and Persuasion”, in Weatherall, A., Watson, B. and Gallois, C. (eds.) Language, Discourse and Social Psychology, Basingstoke/ New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 255-275. Bull, P. (2008) “Slipperiness, Evasion and Ambiguity: Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse”, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (4), pp. 333-344. Butler, J. (2006) “Burning Acts, Injurious Speech”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 499-506. Cano Mora, L. (2003) “At the Risk of Exaggerating: How do Listeners React to Hyper bole”, in Anglogermanica Online. Retrieved on 15.12.2009: http://anglogermanica.uv.es:8080/Joumal/Viewer.aspx?Year=2003֊04 ID=cano.pdf 269
Cap, P. (2008) “Towards the Proximisation Model of the Analysis of Legitimisation in Political Discourse”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp. 17-41. Capone, A. (2008) “On Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech”, in International Journal of Language and Communication, 27, pp. 87-122. Carbó, T. (2004) “Parliamentary Discourse When Things Go Wrong: Mapping Histo ries, Contexts, Conflicts”, in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins PC, pp. 301-337. Chafe, W. (1986) “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”, in Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epi stemology, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 261-272. Chantrill, P. and Mio, J. (1996) “Metonymy in Political Discourse”, in Mio, J. and Katz, A. (eds.) Metaphor: Implications and Applications, New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates Publishers, 171-184. Charteris-Black, J. (2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The persuasive power of me taphor, Basingstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (1997) “Discourse and Politics”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction - Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Voi. 2, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 206-230. Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (2002) “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John
Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-44. Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (2002b) Politics as Text and Talk, Amsterdam and Phi ladelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse, London New York: Routeledge. Chourliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethin king Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Christensen, W. and Ferree, M. (2008) “Cowboy of the World? Gender Discourse and the Iraq War Debate”, in Qualitative Sociology: Special Issue on Political Vi olence, 31 (3), pp. 287-306. dayman, S. (2001) “Answers and Evasion”. Retrieved on 5/6/2008: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/clayman/docs/AnswersandEvasions .pdf Coulthard, M. (ed.) (1992) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge. Collins, P. (2009) Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. Crystal, D. (2008) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Cucchi, C. (2007) “An Investigation of General Extenders in a Corpus of EU Par liamentary Debates”, in Davies, M. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference CL2007, University of Birmingham (UK), 27-30 July 2007. Retrieved on 3.03.2010: http://corpus.bham.ac.uk/corplingproceedings07/paper/242_Paper.pdf Curzon, G. (2007) Modern Parliamentary Eloquence, London: Yoakum Press. 270
Čomski, N. (1979) Gramatika i um. Beograd/Nolit. Crompton, P. (1997) “Hedging in Academic Writing: Theoretical Problems”, in En glish for Specific Purposes, 16(4), pp. 271-287. David, M. and et al. (2009) “Levels of Politeness in Malaysian Parliamentary Discour se”, in Language in India, 9, pp. 1-31. Retrived on 3.3.2010: http://www.languageinindia.com/sep2009/politenessmalaysiaparliament.pdf De Ayala (2001) “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? Politeness in Question Time”, in Journal of Pragmatics, Oxford: Elsevier, 33(2), pp. 143-169. De Beaugrande (1997) “The Story of Discourse Analysis”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Dis course as Structure and Process, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 35-63. De Beaugrande, R. (2006), “Critical discourse analysis: History, Ideology, Metho dology”, in Studies in Language Capitalism, pp. 29-56. Retrieved on 20.12.2009: http://semiotics.nured.uowm.gr/pdfs/Beaugrande.pdf De Beaugrande, R. (2008) “The Discourse and Counter-Discourse of Huge Chavez”, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 2 (1), pp. 17-30. Dedaić, M. (2005) “Ironic Denial: Tobože in Croatian Political Discourse”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 37, pp. 667-683. Dibattista, D. (2004) “Legitimising and Informative Discourse in the Kosovo Debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies”, in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 151-184. Dupret, B. and Feriié, J. (2008) “Legislation at the Shopfloor Level: Background Knowledge
and Relevant Context of Parliamentary Debates”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp. 960-978. Edelman, M. (1974) “The Language of Politics”. Retrieved on 9.1.2010: http://www. eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp7_ nfpb=true _ ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED098789 ERICExtSear ch_SearchType_0=no accno=ED098789 Edelman, M. (1977) Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail. New York: Academic Press. Edwards, J. and Valenzano, J. (2007) “Bill Clinton’s New Partnership Anecdote: Towards a Post-Cold War Foreign Policy Rhetoric”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 6 (3), pp. 303-325. Eemeren, F. et al. (2002) Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Eggins, S. (2004) “An Overview of Systemic Functional Linguistics”, in Eggins, S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, London/New York: Continuum, pp. 1-23. Eira, C. (2005) “Obligatory Intertextuality and Proscribed Plagiarism: Intersections and Contradictions for Research Writing”. Paper presented at the 2nd AsiaPacific Educational Integrity Conference at the University of New Castle, Au stralia, 3-5 December. Retrieved on 1.1.2010: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/conference/apeic/papers_pdf/eira_0514_edd.pdf Elspass, S. (2002) “Phraseological Units in Parliamentary Discourse”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to 271
Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 81-110. Ensink, T. (1997) “The Footing of a Royal Address: An Analysis of Represantitiveness in Political Speech, Exemplified in Queen Beatrix’s Address to the Knesset on March 28, 1995”, in Schaffner, C. (ed.) Analysing Political Speech, Clevedon/ Philadelphia/Toronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 5-32. Evinson, J. (2010) “What are the Basics of Analysing a corpus?”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Abingdon/New York: Routeledge, pp. 122-135. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995b) Media Discourse. London, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold. Fairclough, N. (1996) “Critical Analysis of Media Discourse”, in Marris, P. and Thomtam, S. (eds.) Media Studies, a Reader, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Pre ss, pp. 308-325. Fairclough, N. (2000) “Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research: The Discourse of Welfare Reform”, in Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), pp. 163-195. Fairclough, N. (2001) “The Dialectics of Discourse”, in Textus, 14 (2), pp. 231-242. Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse. London and New York: Routeledge. Fairclough, N. (2005) “Blair’s contribution to elaborating a new ‘doctrine of internati onal community”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 4 (1), pp. 41-63. Fairclough, N. (2005b) “Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Marges Linguistiques, 9, pp. 76-94.
Retrieved on: 25.12.2009: http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/norman/critdiscanalysis.doc Fenton-Smith, B. (2008) “Discourse Structure and Political Performance in Adversa rial Parliamentary Questioning”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7(1), pp. 99-120. Ferrari, F. (2007) “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investiga ting a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy”, Discourse Society, 18 (5), pp. 603-625. Fetzer, A. and Bull, P. (2008) “Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence: The Strategic Use of Pronouns in Political Interviews”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (2), pp. 271-289. Fetzer, A. (2008) “‘And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing with It’ : The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse”, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), pp. 384-396. Fezter, A. (2002) “Put Bluntly, You Have Something of a Credibilility Problem”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Be njamins Publishing Company, pp. 173-202. Fetzer, A. (2003) “Reformulations and Common Ground”. Paper presented at the Eight International Pragmatics Conference of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) in Toronto, 2003. Retrieved on 1.09.2009: http://sws.bu.edu/bfraser/Reformulation%20Marker%20Papers/Fetzer%20 -%20RF%20 %20Common%20Ground.doc 272
Fintel, К. and Iatridou, S. (2008) “How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals”, in Gueron, J. and Lecarme, J. (eds.) Time and Mo dality, Berling: Springer, pp. 115-142. Fløttum, К. and Stenvoll, D. (2009) “Blair speeches in a polyphonic perspective: NOTs and BUTs in visions on Europe”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 8(2), pp. 269-286. Foucault, M. (2006) “The Incitement to Discourse”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 491-499. Franklin, B. (1994) Packaging Politics. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold. Frantz, R. (2003) “In defense of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Working Papers in TESOL Applied Linguistics, New York: Teachers College, Columbia Uni versity, 3 (2). Retrieved on: 15.12.2009: http://www.tc.edu/tesolalwebjoumal/Frantz.pdf Fraser, B. (2010) “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging”, in Kalenbock et al. (eds.) New Approaches to Hedging, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 15-34. Framuselu, M. and Ilie, C. (2010) “Pseudo-Parliamentary Discourse in a Communist Dictatorship: Dissenter Pârvulescu vs. Dictator Ceauşescu”, in Journal of Pra gmatics, 42, pp. 924-942. Gadavanij, S. (2002) “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Con fidence Debates in Thailand”, in Nelson, D. (ed.) Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, pp. 35-55. Gastil, J. (1992) “Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Po litical Discourse”, in Discourse Society, 3, pp. 469-500. Gee, J. P. (2005) An Introduction to Discourse
Analysis - Theory and Method. London and New York: Routeledge. Gelabert-Desnoyer, J. (2008) “Not So Impersonal: Intentionality in the Use of Prono un Uno in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse”, in Pragmatics, 18 (3), pp. 407-424. Goatly, A. (1997) The Language of Metaphors. London: Routeledge. Goddard, A. (2002) The Language of Advertising. London and New York: Routeledge. Goddard, C. (1996) “Cross-Linguistic Research on Metaphor”, in Language Communication, 16(2), pp. 145-151. Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (1997) “Discourse and Culture”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction - Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Voi. 2, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 231-257. Goffman, E. (2006) “On Facework: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interac tion”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (ed.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 299-310. Gräber, D. (1976) “Verbal Behaviour of Political Elites” in Gräber, D. Verbal Beha viour and Politics, Chicago: University of Illionois, pp. 174-213. Graddol, D. and Boyd-Barrett, O. (eds.) (1994) Media Texts: Authors and Readers, Philadelphia: The Open University. Graesser, C. et al. (1997) “Cognition”, inVan Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 292-319. 273
Grice, H. P. (2006) “Logic and Conversation”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 76-88. Griffiths, P. (2006) An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Grimshaw, A. (2003) “Genres, Registers and Contexts of Discourse”, in Graesser, A. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 25-82. Haig, E. (2004) “Some Observations on the Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Studies in Language and Culture, 25(2): pp. 129-149. Halmari, H. (2008) “On the Language of the Clinton-Dole Presidential Campaign De bates: General Tendencies and Successful Strategies”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (2), pp. 247-270. Halmi, A., Belušić, R. i Ogresta, J. (2004) „Sociokonstruktivistički pristup analizi me dijskog diskursa“, u Medijskim istraživanjama, 10 (2), տէր. 35-50. Harris, S. (2001) “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adver sarial Political Discourse”, in Discourse Society, 12(4), pp. 451-472. Harris, S. et al. (2006) “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies”, in Discourse Soci ety, 17(6), pp. 715-737. Harris, Z. (1952) “Discourse Analysis”, in Language, 28(1), pp. 1-30. Hart, C. (2005) “Analysing Political Discourse: Toward a cognitive approach”, in Cri tical Discourse Studies, 2 (2), pp. 189-94. Henderson, R. (2005) “A Faircloughian Approach to CDA: Principled Eclecticism or a Method Searching for a Theory?”, in Melbourne Studies in Education, 46 (2),pp. 9-24. Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1986)
“Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences”, in American Journal of Sociology, 92 (1), pp. 110-157. Hodge, R. and Gunther, K. (1993) Language as Ideology. London and New York: Routeledge. Hodges, A (2008) “The Dialogic Emergence of ‘Truth’ in Politics: Reproduction and Subversion of the ‘War on Terror’ Discourse”. Retrieved on 10.08.2008: www.colorado.edu/ling/CRIL/Volume21 Issue 1 /paperHODGES .pdf Holly (1989) “Credibility and Political Language”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 115-35. Højer, Andreas (2008) The Battle of Hearts and Minds: An Analysis of the Iraq War Discourse in Politics and Newspapers, Tromsø: Tromsø University. Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) (2007) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Horn, L. (2007) “Implicature”, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 3-28. Huckin, T. (2002) “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Discourse of Condescension”, in Barton, E. and Stygall, H. (eds.) Discourse Studies in Composition, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 155-176. Hunston, S. (2006) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam and Phila delphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 274
Hyland, К. (2005) Metadiscourse. London and New York: Continuum. Die, C. (1999) “Disagreement about agreement: key word polarization in parliamen tary debates”, in Lineli, P. et al. (eds.), Samtal och språkanvändning i pro fessionerna. Rapport från ASLA:s Һ5stsymposium, Linköping, 6-7 November 1997, Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 111-122. Ilie, C. (2000) “Cliché-based Metadiscursive Argumentation in the Houses of Parlia ment”, in International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), pp. 65-84. Ilie, C. (2003a) “Parenthetically Speaking: Parliamentary Parentheticals as Rhetorical Strategies”, in Bondi, M. and Stati, S. (eds.) Dialogue Analysis 2000: Selected Papers from the 10th IADA Anniversary Conference, Bologna, 2000, Tübin gen: Niemeyer, pp. 253-264. Ilié, C. (2003b) “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), pp. 71-92. Ilié, C. (2003c) “Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse”, in Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(1), pp. 25-33. Ilié, C. (2004) “Insulting as (Unparliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach”, Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Per spectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 45-86. Ilié, C. (2005) “Politeness in Sweden: Parliamentary forms of address”, in Hickey, L. and Stewart, M. (eds.) Politeness in Europe, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 174-188. Ilié, C. (2006) “Parliamentary Discourses”, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Lan guage and Linguistics, Voi. 2,
Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 188-197. Ilié, C. (2010) “Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), pp.885-911. Ilié, C. (2010b) “Analytical Perspectives on Parliamentary and Extra-parliamentary Discourses”, in Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 879-884. Ivić, M. (1983) Pravci u lingvistici. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije. Ivić, M. (2003) „O srpskim partikularna pa і та iz perspektive ‘fativne’ і ‘reaktivne’ ñinkcije jezika”, u Zborniku Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku, 46(1), Տէր. 15-21. Janks, H. (1997) “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool”, in Discourse: Stu dies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18 (3), pp. 329-342. Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) (2006) The Discourse Reader. London and New York: Routeledge. Jørgemsen, M. and Philips. L. (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage. Jones, J. andPeccei, J. (2007) “Language and Politics”, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 35-55. Jose, J. and Moore, T. (2007) “The Concept ‘Governance’ within Parliamentary Dis course 1983-93”. Paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Associa tion Conference, Melbourne, 24-25 September, 2007. Retrieved on 3.03.2010: http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/psi/news-and-events/apsa/refereed-papers/aunz-politics/jose_moore.pdf 275
Kehler, A. (2007) “Discourse Coherence”, in Horn, L. and Wand, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 241-265. Kendall, G. and Wickham, G. (2006) “Problems with the Critical Posture? Foucault and Critical Discourse Analysis” in C. Hopkinson and C. Hall (eds.) Social Change in the 21st Century. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology (electronic publication). Kennedy, G. (2003) “Amplifier Collocations in the British National Corpus”, in Tesol Quarterly, 37 (3), pp. 467-488. Klajn, I. (2000) „Lice kao gramatička i komunikacijska kategorija“, u Klajn. I. Lingvi stičke studije, Beograd: Partenon, տէր. 88-105. Klajn, I. (2005) Gramatika srpskog jezika. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. Knowles, M. and Moon, R. (2006) Introducing Metaphor. London and New York: Routeledge. Komlósi, L. and Tarrósy, I. (2010) “Presumptive Arguments Turned into a Fallacy of Presumtuousness: Pre-election Debates in a Democracy of Promises”, in Jour nal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 957-972. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006) “Visual Interaction“, in Jaworski, A. and Cou pland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 362-384. Lakič, I. (1999) Analiza žanra. Univerzitet Cme Gore: Podgorica. Lakič, I. (2011) Jezik, mediji, rat. Univerzitet Сте Gore: Podgorica. Lakoff, G. (1995) “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust”. Retrieved on 27.1.2010: http://www.wwcd.org/issues/Lakoff.html Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003) Metaphors We Live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2003b) “Metaphor and War, Again”. Retrieved on 27.01.2010: http://www. altemet.org/story/15414/?page=entire Lakoff, G. (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company. Leudar, I. et al. (2004) “On Membership Categorisation: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Vi olence’ in Political Discourse”, in Discourse Society, 15(2-3), pp. 243-266. Lillian, D. (2008) “Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse”, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Discplines, 2(l),pp. 1-16. Lorda, C. (2010) “A Consensual Topic: The French and Spanish Parliaments against Domestic Violence”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 943-956. Luke, A. (2002) “Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Dis course Analysis”, in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, pp. 96-110. Majstorovič, D. (2007) „Moćni očevi i grešna djeca: analiza diskursa visokog pred stavnika“, Puls demokratije. Pristupljeno 29.01.2010: http://www.pulsdemokratije.net/admin/files/Majstorovic%200HR%20diskur%20Za%20postavljanje%2023juli07.doc Markkanen, R. and Schröder, H. (1997) “Hedging: A Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis”, in Markkanen, R. and Schröder, H. (eds.) Hedging and Discourse, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 3-20. 276
Martin Martin, P. (2008) “The Mitigation of Scientific Claims in Research Papers: A Comparative Study”, in International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), pp. 133-152. Matthiessen, C. and Halliday, M. (2009) “Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory”. Retrieved on 28.1.2010: http ://web .mac. com/cmatthie/iWeb/SMMG_resources/Sy dney_2007_SFL_Libraryfiles/SFGFirstStepll .pdf Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. (2001) Using English from Conversation to Canon. Lon don and New York: Routeledge. Maybin, J. (2001) “Everyday Talk”, in Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. Using English from Conversation to Canon. London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 5-27. McCarthy, M. (1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers, Cambridge: CUP. McCarthy, M. (2001) Issues in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. McCarthy, M. and O’Keeffe, A. (2010) “What are Corpora and How have They Evol ved?”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Abingdon/New York: Routeledge, pp. 3-13. Meadows, B. (2007) “Distancing and Showing Solidarity via Metaphor and Metonymy in Political Discourse: A Critical Study of American Statements on Iraq during the Years 2004-2005”, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1 (2), pp. 1-17. Meyer, C. (2004) English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Mihas, E. (2005) “Non-literal Language in Political Discourse”, in LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, pp. 124-139. Mills, S. (2004) Discourse. London and New York: Routeledge. Mitsikopolou, B. (2008) “The Branding of Political Entities as
Discursive Practice”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (3), pp. 353-371. Moreno, M. (2008) Metaphors in Hugo Chavez’s Political Discourse: Conceputalising Nation, Revolution and Opposition. New York: City University of New York. Mrazović, P. i Vukadinović, Z. (1990) Gramatika srpskohrvatskog jezika za strance. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižamica Z. Stanojeviča i Novi Sad: Dobra vest. Mülhäusler, P. (1995) “Metaphors Others Live by”, in Language Communication, 15 (3), pp. 281-288. Müller, R. (2005) “Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical Conside rations on the Basis of Swiss Speeches”, in Metaphoric.de, 9. Retrieved on 14.1.2010: www.metaphorik.de/09/mueller.pdf Muntigl, P. (2002) “Politization and Depolitization: Employment Policy in the Euro pean Union”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 45-80. Musolff, A. (2004) Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in De bates about Europe. Basingstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Nuyts, J. (2001) Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualisation. Amster dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Odouri, R. (2002) “Language and Politics in Kenya: Restricted and Elaborated Co des”, in Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1 (4), pp. 434-441. 277
O’Halloran, К. (2010) “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in the Study of Media Dis course”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon/New York: Routeledge, pp. 563-577. O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) (2010) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon/New York: Routeledge. Orpin, D. (2005) “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Internati onal Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10 (1), pp. 37-61. Orwell, G. (1946) “Politics and the English Language”, in Complete Works of Geor ge Orwell. Retrieved on 7.1.2010: http://www.george-orwell.Org/Politics_and_the_English_Language/0.html Ostojič, В. (1999) Kratka pregledna gramatika srpskog jezika. Zemun: Nijansa. Palmer, F. (1988) The English Verb. London/New York: Longman. Palmer, F. (2001) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parkin, D. (1984) “PoEtical Language”, in Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, pp. 345-365. Partington, A. (2003) The Linguistics of Political Argument. London: Routledge. Perovič, S. (2009) Jezik u akciji. Podgorica: CID. Perovič, S. (ur.) (2014) Analiza diskursa: teorije і metode. Institut za strane jezike: Podgorica. Perovič, S. (2017) Pojmovna metafora kulturno srodnih pojmova. CANU: Podgorica. Pešič, J. (1997) „Analiza diskursa і njen odnos s psihologijom“, u Psihologija, 3, str. 263-278. Pikalo, J. (2008) „Mechanical Metaphors in Politics“, in Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. Poli tical Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. Lon don and New York: Routeledge, pp. 41-54. Piper, P. et al.
(2005) Sintaksa savremenog srpskog jezika. Beograd: SANU, Beo gradska knjiga i Matica srpska. Piper, P. (2008) „Imenska grupa u slovenačkom jeziku (u poređenju sa srpskim)”, u Zborniku Matice srpske za slavistiku, 74, str. 147-171. Pridham, F. (2001) The Language of Conversation. London: Routeledge. Pu, C. (2007) “Discourse Analysis of President Bush’s Speech at Tsinghua University, China”, in International Communication Studies, XVI, pp. 205-215. Quirk et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman. Rađić-Bojanić, B. i Silaški, N. (2008) „Sportizacija političkog diskursa ֊ kako meta fore prikrivaju političku stvarnost Srbije“, u Zborniku Matice srpske za filo logiju i lingvistiku, LI/1-2, str. 139-155. Rasiah, P. (2007) Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time. Perth: Uni versity of Western Australia. Rasiah, P. (2010) “A Framework for the Systematic Analysis of Evasion in Parliamen tary Discourse”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 664-680. Rečnik srpskohrvatskoga književnog jezika (1967) Novi Sad: Matica srpska, Za greb: Matica hrvatska. Renkema, J. (2004) Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia/ New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 278
Richards, К. and Seedhouse, R (eds.) (2007) Applying Conversation Analysis, Ba singstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Rindler Schjerve, R. (1989) “The Political Speech of Futurism and Its Relationship to Italian Fascism”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amster dam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 57-81. Rojo, L. M. and van Dijk, T. (1997) ‘“There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Dis course”, in Discourse Society, 8(4): pp. 532-566. Saddock, J. (2007) “Speech Acts”, in Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 53-73. Safire, W. (2008) Safire’s Political Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994) “Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical En glish Written Discourse” in English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), pp. 149-171. Salkie, R. (1995) Text and Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge. Santibanez, C. (2010) “Metaphors and Argumentation: The Case of Chilean Parlia mentarian Media Participation”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 973-989. Sauer, C. (1989) “Structures of Consensus-making and Intervention: the Concept of Nazi Language Policy in Occupied Holland”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishi ng Company, pp. 3-39. Sauer, C. (1997) “Echoes from Abroad - Speeches for Domestic Audience: Queen Beatrix’s Address to the Israeli Parliament”, in Schaffner, C. (ed.) Analysing Political Speech,
Clevedon/Philadelphia/Toronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Mul tilingual Matters LTD, pp. 33-67. Savoy, J. (2009) “Lexical Analysis of Obama’s and McCain’s Speeches”. Retrieved on 15.1.2010: http://members.unine.ch/jacques.savoy/Papers/ Schaffner, C. (1997) “Editorial: Political Speeches and Discourse Analysis”, in Schaffner, C. (ed.) Analysing Political Speech, Clevedon/Philadelphia/ Toron to/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 1-4. Schaffner, C. (ed.) (1997b) Analysing Political Speech. Clevedon/Philadelphia/ To ronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD. Schaffner, C. (2004) “Political Discourse Analysis from the Point of View of Transla tion Studies”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 3 (1), pp. 117-150. Searle, J. (1968) “Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts”, in The Philosophi cal Review, 77 (4), pp. 405-424. Seedhouse, P. (2007) “Conversation Analysis as Research Methodology”, in: Richar ds, K. and Seedhouse, P. (eds.) Applying Conversation Analysis. Basingsto ke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 251-266. Semino, E. and Masei, M. (1996) “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy”, in Discourse Society, 7 (2), pp. 243-269. Shenhav, S. (2008) “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament”, in Dis course and Society, 19(2), pp. 223-255. Sheyholislami, J. (2001) Yesterday’s “Separatists” are Today’s “Resistance Fighters. Ottawa: Carleton University. 279
Shi-xu (2005) “Discourse and Reality”, in Shi-xu, A Cultural Approach to Discour se, Basingstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 13-41. Silaški, N., Đurović, T. i Radić-Bojanić, В. (2009) Javni diskurs Srbije. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta u Beogradu. Silaški, N. i Đurović, T., (2010) “The Conceptualisation of the Global Financial Crisis via the Economy Is a Person Metaphor -A Contrastive Study of English and Serbi an“, Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature, 8(2): pp. 129-139. Silić, J. i Pranjković, I. (2005) Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Simić, R. (2002) Srpska gramatika. Beograd: Naučno društvo za negovanje i prou čavanje srpskog jezika; Nikšić: Jasen. Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (1997) “Modal (Un)Certainty in Political Discourse: A Func tional Account”, in Language Sciences, 19 (4): 341-356. Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (1997b) “Meanings of I think, a Study Based on Parallel Corpora” in Quarterly Newsletter of the Contrastive Grammar Research Group of the University of Gent. Retrieved on 31.07.2010: http://www.contragram.ugent.be/index.php?id=20 type=content anchor=TH INK#THINK Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2001) “The Functions of I Think in Political Discourse”, in International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), pp. 41-63. Simon-Vandenbergen, A., White, P. and Aijmer, K. (2007) “Presupposition and ‘Taking-for-Granted in Mass communicated Political Argument”, in Fetzer, A. and Lauerbach, G. (eds.) Political Discourse in the Media, Amsterdam and Phila delphia: John Benjanmins Publishing Company, pp. 31-75.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2007b) The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Cor pus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2008) “Almost Certainly and Most Definitely. Degree Modi fiers and Epistemic Stance”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), pp. 1521-1542. Šimunić, Z. (2008) “Deiktička referencija i generičko strukturiranje diskursa“, u Ra spravama Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 34, str. 371-391. Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1992) “Towards an Analysis of Discourse”, in Coutlhard, M. (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge, pp. 1-35. Sinclair, J. (1992) “Priorities in Discourse Analysis”, in Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge, pp. 79-88. Sinclair, J. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London and New York: Routeledge. Škara, D. (2009) “Jezična/mentalna rekonstrukcija EU prostora: nove konceptualne metafore”, u Bratanic, M. (ur.) Hrvatski na putu u EU, Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada, str. 1-28. Pristupljeno 25.1.2010: http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/413894.maja.lanak.doc Somig, К. (1989) “Some Remarks on Linguistic Strategies of Persuasion”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 95-115. Sosir, F. (1969) Opšta lingvistika. Beograd: Nolit. Stanojčić, Ž. і Popovič, Lj. (1992) Gramatika srpskog jezika. Beograd, Novi Sad: Zavod za udžbenike і nastavna sredstva. 280
Stevanovič, M. (1986) Savremeni srpskohrvatski jezik. Beograd: Naučna knjiga. Stevič, S. (1997) Analiza konverzacije. Beograd: Filološki fakultet. Stockwell, P. (2002) Sociolinguistics. London and New York: Routeledge. Švabić, Š. (2004) “Mitologije kao konstitutivan element suvremenog političkog dis kursa”, u Časopisu za interdisciplinarna istraživanja rata i mira, 7 (13-14), Տէր. 177-192. Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis, Cambridge: CUP. Takahashi, H. (2010) “Central Banking as “Fluid Dynamics”: A Comparative Study of English and Japanese Metaphors of Money”, in Language Research Bulletin, 25, pp. 1-18. Tannen, D. (2005) Conversational Style: Analysing Talk among Friends. New York: Oxford University Press. Tetlock, P. (1984) “Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons”, in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (2), pp. 365-375. Threadgold, T. (2003) “Cultural Studies, Critical Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis: Histories, Remembering and Futures”, in Homscheidt, A. (ed.) Lin guistik Online, 14/2003, pp. 5-37. Tomlin, R. et al. (1997) “Discourse Semantics”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publicati ons, pp. 63-111. Trbojević-Milošević, L (2004) Modalnost, sud, iskaz: epistemička modalnost u en gleskom i srpskom jeziku. Beograd: Filološki fakultet. Vaara, E. et al. (2006) “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Glo bal Industrial Restructuring”, in Organisation Studies, 27 (6), pp. 789-810. Vaara, E. and Monin, P. (2010) “A Recursive
Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organisational Action in Mergers and Acquisitions”, in Organisational Science, 21 (1), pp. 3-22. van der Valk, L (2003) “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in Fran ce”, in Discourse and Society, 14 (3), pp. 309-348. van Dijk, T. (1980) “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Functional Coherence in Dis course”, in Versus, pp. 49-65. van Dijk, T. (1985) “Semantic Discourse Analysis”, inVan Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Voi. 2, London: Academic Press, pp. 103-136. van Dijk, T. (1985b) “Introduction: Discourse Analysis as a New Cross-Discipline”, in Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 1, London/Orlando: Academic press, pp. 1-10. van Dijk, T. (1989) “Social Congition and Discourse”, in Giles, H. and Robinson P. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology and Language, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 163-183. van Dijk, T. (1993) “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Discourse Soci ety, London: Sage, 4 (2), pp. 249-283. van Dijk, T. (1993b) “Discourse and Cognition in Society”, in Crowley D. and Mitchell D. (eds.) Communication Theory Today, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 107-126. van Dijk, T. (1995) “Ideological Discourse Analysis”, In Ventola, E. and Solin, A. (eds.), New Courant: Special Issue Interdisciplinary approaches to dis281
course analysis, pp. 135-161. Retrieved on 7.02.2010: http://www.discourses.org/01dArticles/Ideological%20discourse%20analysis.pdf van Dijk, T. (1997) “Political Discourse and Racism. Describing Others in Western Parliaments”, in Riggins, S. (ed.), The Language and Politics of Exclusion, Others in Discourse, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 31-64. van, Dijk. T (ed.) (1997b) Discourse as Structure and Process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications. van, Dijk. T. (1997c) “The Study of Discourse”, in van, Dijk T. (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publicati ons, pp.1-34. van Dijk, T. (2000) “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration”, in Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (eds.) The semiotics of racism. Approaches to critical discourse analysis, Vienna: Passagen Verlag, pp. 85-103. van Dijk, T. (2001) “Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Tannen, D. et al. (eds.), Handbo ok of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 352-371. van Dijk, T. (2002) “Political Discourse and Political Cognition”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Po litical Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 203-234. van Dijk, T. (2003) “Political Discourse and Ideology”, in Lorda, C. and Ribas, M. (eds.), Anàlisi del discurs politic, Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, IULA, pp. 207-225. van Dijk, T. (2003b) Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: Ariel. Retrieved on 2.1.2010. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24649432/Van-
Dijk-Ideology-and-Discourse-AMultidisciplinary-Introduction van Dijk, T. (2003c) “Knowledge in Parliamentary Debates”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), pp. 93-129. van Dijk, T. (2004) “Politics, Ideology and Discourse”. Retrieved on 1.02.2008: http:// www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Politics,%20ideology20and%20discourse%20(ELL).htm van Dijk, T. (2004b) “Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates”, in Bayley, P. (ed.), Cross-cultural Perspective on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 339-372. van Dijk, T. (2005) “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally. Political implicatures of Aznar’s Legitimization of the War in Iraq”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), pp. 65-92. van Dijk, T. (2006) “Discourse and Manipulation”, in Discourse Society, London/ New Delhi: Sage Publications, 17 (2), pp. 359-383. van Dijk, T. (2008a) “Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalisation: Problem or Pseudo-Problem”, in Discourse Society, 19 (6), pp. 821-828. van Dijk, T. (2008b) “Discourse, Knowledge, Power and Politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis”. Lecture CADAAD 2008, Hertfordshire, 10-12 July 2008. Retrieved on 10.12.2009: http://www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Discourse,%20knowledge,%20power%20and%20politics.pdf 282
van Dijk, T. (2008c) “Contextualisation in Parliamentary Discourse: Aznar, Iraq and the Pragmatics of Lying”, in Van Dijk, T. Discourse and Power, Basingstoke/ New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 237-289. van Dijk, T. (s.a.) “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Retrieved on 15.4.2008: http://www. discourses.org/01dArticles/Critical%20discourse%20analysis.pdf van Leeuwen, M. (2008) “The Style of Political Speeches: Problems in Existing Met hods”, in Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association. Retrieved on 14.01.2010: http://www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2008/vanleeuwen2008.pdf Van Leeuwen, M. (2009) “Clear vs. Woolly Language Use in Political Speeches: The Case of the Controversial Dutch Politician Geert Wilders”, in Online Procee dings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association. Retrieved on 14.01.2010: www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2009/vanleeuwen2009.pdf van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999) “Legitimising Immigration Control: a Discour se-Historical Analysis”, in Discourse Studies, 1(1), pp. 83-118. van Leeuwen, T. (2007) “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication”, in Discour se and Communication, 1(1), pp. 91-112. van Leeuwen, T. (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Varttala, T. (1999) “Remarks on the Communicative Functions of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine”, in English for Speci fic Purposes, 18 (2), pp. 177-200. Vazques, I. and Giner, D. (2008) “Beyond Mood and
Modality: Epistemic Modality Markers as Hedges in Research Articles. A Cross-Disciplinary Study” in Revi sta Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, pp. 171-190. Velčić, M. (1987) Uvod u lingvistiku teksta. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Vukovič, M. (2009) Diskurs političkih intervjua u elektronskim medijima (magi starski rad). Filozofski fakultet: Nikšić. Vukovič, M. (2011a) „Personalnost u parlamentarnom diskursu: prvo lice množine”, u Sadžak, M. (ur.) Filolog, 3, Univerzitet u Banja Luci: Banja Luka, str. 192-201. Vukovič, M. (2011b) „Prvo lice jednine u crnogorskom parlamentarnom diskursu”, u Knežević, M. (ur.) Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, 3/4, Filozofski fakultet: Nikšić, տէր. 19-34. Vukovič, M. (2012a) “Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary dis course: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro“, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse Society, 23(2), Sage: Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington, pp. 184-202. Vukovič, M. (2012b) „Polarizacija diskursnih učesnika u parlamentarnim debatama”, u Polovina i Vučo (ur.) Zbornik radova konferencije „Filološka istraživanja danas” - Savremeni tokovi u lingvističkim istraživanjima (26. i 27.11.2010), knjiga 1. Filološki fakultet: Beograd, str. 63-76. Vukovič, M. (2013a) Diskurs parlamentarnih debata (doktorska disertacija). Filo zofski fakultet: Nikšić. Vukovič, M. (2013b) „Slaba epistemička modalnost u crnogorskom parlamentar nom diskursu”, Filolog, 7, Univerzitet u Banja Luci: Banja Luka, str. 65-76. 283
ISSN:2233-1158, UDK: 32.019.5:316.776.2] :811.163.41 (497.16, DOI: 10.725 1/FIL1307065V) Vukovič (2014а) „Kritička analiza diskursa“, u Perovič, S. (ur.) Analiza diskursa: teorije і metode. Podgorica: Institut za strane jezike, str. 97-114. Vukovič (2014b) „Analiza političkog diskursą“,u Perovič, S. (ur.) Analiza diskursa: teorije і metode. Podgorica: Institut za strane jezike, str. 213-248. Vukovič, M. (2014c) “Weak Epistemic Modality in the UK Parliamentary Discourse”, Logos Littera: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 1, Institute of Forei gn Languages: Podgorica, pp. 121-129. Vukovič, M. (2014d) “Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse”, Open Linguistics, 1(1), De Gruyter: Berlin and Boston, pp. 37-52. Vukovič, M. (2014e) “Jaka epistemička modalnost u parlamentarnom diskursu”, III konferencija Društva za primijenjenu lingvistiku - Primijenjena lingvistika u fokusu, DPLCG i ISJ: Podgorica, str. 117-132. Vukovič, M. (2014í) “The Discourse of the Economic Crisis: Health and Sickness Metaphors in the Montenegrin and the UK Parliament”, 4th International Con ference Applied Linguistics Today (ALT 4), Belgrade, 12-14 October, 2012, Primenjena lingvistika 14, pp. 51-62. Vukovič Starnatovič, M. (2016) “Scaling deontic modality in parliamentary discour se”, Logos Littera: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 3(2), Faculty of Philology: Podgorica, pp. 131-149. Vukovič Starnatovič, M. (2017) “Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in ti mes of crisis: the case of the uk and the monténégrin parliament“, Pragmatics Society 9(1), John Benjamins Publishing
Company, Amsterdam and Phila delphia, pp. 281-311. Vukovič Stamatović, М. i Bratić, V. (2018) “Conceptual Container Metaphors and En trapment in Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway”, Primerjalna književnost, 41(3), տէր. 141-164. Waddel, N. and McKenna, В.(2003) “The Colour of Political Rhetoric”. Retrieved on 15.7.2008: http://espace.library.uq.edu.aU/eserv/UQ:10933/colrhet.pdf Walker, C. (2004) “An Analysis of the Persuasive Devices Used in Two Speeches from Churchill during the Second World War, Compared with Those Used in Tony Blair’s Speeches at the Start of the War on Iraq”, Lancaster: Lancaster Univer sity. Retrieved on 3.8.2008: www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/courses/ling/ling20 l/res/diss/2004/walkerc01 .doc Ward, G. and Bimer, B. (2007) “Information Structure and Non-canonical Syntax”, in Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 153-174. Wattles, I. and Radić-Bojanić, В. (2007) “The Analysis of an Online Debate ֊ The Syste mic Functional Grammar Approach”, in Facta Universitatis, 5 (1), pp. 47-58. Widdowson, H. (1979) “Approaches to Discourse”, in Widdowson, H. Explora tions in Applied Linguistics. Vol. I. Oxford: OUP, pp. 109-137. Retrieved on 15.03.2010: http://www.oup.com/elt/catalogue/guidance_articles/LoC_ Explorations?cc=global Widdowson, H. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Wilamova, S. (2005) “On the Function of Hedging Devices in Negatively Polite Dis284
course”, in Sborník prací Facultatis Filozofické Fakulty Brnenske Univer zity, Brno: Brno University, pp. 85-93. Retrived on 15.09.2009: http://www. phil.muni.cz/plonedata/wkaa/BSE/BSE_2005-31_Offprints/BSE%20200531 %20%28085-093%29%20Wilamova.pdf Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Lan guage. Oxford/Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. Wilson, J. (2003) “Political Discourse”, in Schriffin, D., Tannen D. and Hamilton, H. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 398-415. Wodak, R. (ed.) (1989) Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam and Phila delphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Wodak, R. (1989b) “Introduction”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideo logy, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. XIII-XX. Wodak, R. (2002) “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Zeitschrift für An gewandte Linguistik, 36, pp. 5-31. Wodak, R. (2002b) “Friend or Foe: the Defamation or Legitimate and Necessary Cri ticism? Reflections on Recent Political Dicourse in Austria“, in Language Communication, 22, pp. 495-517. Wodak, R. (2007) “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry”, in Pragmatics Cognition, Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benja mins Publishing Company, 15 (1), pp. 203-225. Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Wooffitt, R. (2001) “Rhetoric in English”, in Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. (eds.) Using English: From Conversation to Canon, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 122-144. Xiao, R.
and Tao, H. (2007) “A Corpus-Based Sociolingüístic Study of Amplifiers in British English”, in Sociolingüístic Studies, 1(2), pp. 241-273. Yetkin, N. (2006) “A Pragmatic Analysis of Derogation in the Discourse of Politi cal Criticism in the Turkish Grand National Assembly”, in Modern Türklük Araştırmaları Dergisi, Telif Hakki: Ankara, pp. 48-59. Young, L. and Harrison, C. (eds) (2004) Systemic Functional Linguistics. London/ New York: Continuum. Zgobliu, R. (2007) “The Function of Stylistic Features in Political Discourse”, in Stu dia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai ֊ Philologia, 2, pp. 219-226. Zima, E. et al. (2008) “Resonance Activation in Interactional Parliamentary Discour se”, in Ramm, W. and Fabricius-Hansen, C. Linearisation and Segmentation in Discourse. Oslo: University of Oslo, pp. 137-147. 285
|
| adam_txt |
Sadržaj: uvod. 7 ANALIZA DİSKURSA. 11 Pojam analize diskursa. 11 Diskurs.12 Tekst. 14 Žanr. 15 Istorija analize diskursa. 17 Pravci u analizi diskursa.23 Kritički osvrt na analizu diskursa.25 KRITIČKA ANALIZA DİSKURSA.26 Definicija kritičke analize diskursa.26 Istorijski razvoj kritičke analize diskursa.27 Osnovni analitički pojmovi i nivoi analize u kritičkoj analizi diskursa.28 Metodologija kritičke analize diskursa. 30 Norman Ferklaf: socijalna teorija
diskursa. 30 Term van Dajk: sociokognitivni metod. 31 Rut Vodak: socioistorijski metod. 33 Kritički osvrt na kritičku analizu diskursa. 35 KORPUSNA LINGVISTIKA. 38 Pojam korpusna lingvistika. 38 Istorijski razvoj korpusne lingvistike. 39 Metode korpusne lingvistike. 40 Liste riječi. 40 Konkordance. 41 Obilježavanje morfoloških kategorija.42 Kritički osvrt na korpusnu lingvistiku.44 ANALIZA POLITIČKOG DİSKURSA.46 Definicija političkog diskursa. 46 Istorija izučavanja političkog diskursa. 47 Politički diskurs i politička
kognicija. 49 Karakteristike političkog diskursa. 49 Leksika političkog diskursa. 50 Stås : söi Ы iothek München
Gramatika političkog diskursa. 53 Pragmatika političkog diskursa. 58 Retorika političkog diskursa. 62 Makrostrategije. 68 Žanrovi političkog diskursa. 69 DISKURS PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA. 71 Diskurs parlamenta. 71 Parlamentarna debata kao žanr.73 Institucionalne specifičnosti parlamentarnih debata. 74 Fonografski zapisi sjednice.79 Dosadašnja istraživanja diskursa parlamentarnih debata.79 POLARIZACIJA U DISKURSU PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA. 81 1. Polarizacija u crnogorskom parlamentu.82 1.1. Polarizacija điskursnih učesnika u crnogorskom parlamentu. 82 1.2. Polarizacija sadržaja. 108 1.3. Rezime i
zaključci. 115 2. Polarizacija u britanskom parlamentu. 118 2.1. Polarizacija điskursnih učesnika.118 2.2. Polarizacija sadržaja. 136 2.3. Rezime i zaključci. 142 3. Kontrastivna analiza polarizacije u crnogorskom i britanskom parlamentu.144 POJAČAVANJE ISKAZA U DISKURSU PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA.148 1. Pojačavanje iskaza u crnogorskom parlamentu. 149 1.1. Jaka epistemička modalnost. 150 1.2. Jaka deontička modalnost. 160 1.3. Prilozi amplifikatori. 162 1.4. Pridjevi intenzifikatori. 163 1.5. Metakomenari za pojačavanje iskaza. 167 1.6. Rezime. 167 2. Pojačavanje iskaza u britanskom parlamentu. 168 2.1. Jaka epistemička modalnost. 168 2.2. Jaka
deontička modalnost. 177 2.3. Prilozi amplifikatori. 180 2.4. Pridjevi intenzifikatori. 183 2.5. Metakomenari za pojačavanje iskaza. 186 2.6. Rezime. 187 3. Konstrastivna analiza pojačavanja iskaza. 187 UBLAŽAVANJE ISKAZA U PARLAMENTARNIM DEBATAMA. 191 1. Ublažavanje iskaza u crnogorskom parlamentu. 192 1.1. Slaba epistemička modalnost. 192 2.1. Slaba deontička modalnost. 201 2.2. Prilozi ublaživači. 205 2.3. Pridjevi ublaživači. 210 2.4. Metakomentari za ublažavanje. 211 /■ li
2.5. Rezime.211 2. Ublažavanje iskaza u britanskom parlamentu. 212 2.1. Slaba epistemička modalnost.212 2.2. Slaba deontička modalnost.219 2.3. Prilozi ublaživači.221 2.4. Pridjevi ublaživači.224 2.5. Metakomentari za ublažavanje.225 2.6. Rezime.226 3. Kontrastivna analiza ublažavanja iskaza.227 REKONTEKSTUALIZACIJA U DISKURSU PARLAMENTARNIH DEBATA. 231 1. Rekontekstualizacija u crnogorskom parlamentu.232 Rezime. 244 2. Rekontekstualizacija u britanskom parlamentu.245 Rezime.256 3. Konstrastivna analiza rekontekstualizacije.257
ZAKLJUČAK. 259 LITERATURA. 267
LITERATURA Adetunji, A. (2006) “Inclusion and Exclusion in Political Discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches”, in Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5 (2), pp. 177-192. Ahmadvand, M. (2009) “Critical Discourse Analysis: An introduction to major approaches”. Retrived on 20.12.2009: www.iranianlinguistics.org/papers/CriticalDiscourseAnalysis.pdf Allen, W. (2007) “Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches”, in Mushin, I. and Laughren, M. Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society, Brisbane, Australia, 7-9 July, 2006. Retrieved on 2.1.2010: http://espace.library.uq.edu.aU/eserv/UQ:12794/ALLEN_W_ALS2006.pdf Anderson, L. (1986) “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries”, in Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 273-312. Archakis, A. and Tsakona, V. (2009) “Parliamentary Discourse in Newspaper Articles. The Intergration of a Critical Approach to Media Discourse into a Literacy-Ba sed Language Teaching Programme”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 8 (3), pp. 359-385. Archakis, A. and Tsakona, V. (2010) “’The Wolf Wakes up inside Them, Grows Warewolf Hair and Reveals All Their Bullying’: The Representation of Parlia mentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 912-923. Atkinson, M. (1984) Our Masters’ Voices, London and New York: Routeledge. Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: OUP. Bach, K. (1998) “Speech Acts”, in Craig, E. (ed.) Routledge
Encyclopedia of Phi losophy. Retrieved on 20.04.2008: http://online.sfsu.edu/~kbach/spchacts.html Bach, K. (2007) “Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Language”, in Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 463-487. Badurina, L. (2004) „Slojevi javnog diskursa“, u Obdobjima, 22, տէր. 151-164. Bakhtin, M. (1986) “The Problem of Speech Genres”, in Bakhtin, M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Texas: University of Austin. Bara, J. et al. (2007) “Deliberative Democracy and the Analysis of Parliamentary De bate”. Paper presented at the Workshop on ‘Advanced Empirical Study ofDeli261
beration’, Helsinki, 7-12 May, pp.1-47. Retrieved on 3.03.2010: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/helsinki/ws23/ weale.pdf Barker, C. and Galasinski, D. (2001) “Tools for Discourse Analysis”, in Barker, C. and Galasinski, D. Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 62-85. Bavelas, J. et al. (1988) “Political Equivocation: A Situation Explanation”, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Voi. 7 (2), pp. 137-145. Bayley, P. (ed.) (2004) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Bayley, P. (2004b) “The Whys and Wherefores ofAnalysing Parliamentary Discourse”, in Baytey, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-44. Bayley, P. et al. (2004c) “Threat and Fear in Parliamentary Debates in Britain, Ger many and Italy”, in in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Par liamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-236. Bayley, P. and San Vicente, F. (2004) “Ways of talking about work in parliamentary discourse in Britain and Spain” in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspecti ves on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 237-269. Bayley, P. (2005) “Analysing Language and Politics”, in Mediaszioni, 10.1473. Re trieved on 21.12.2009: http://www.mediazionionline.it/articoli/bayley.htm Beard, A. (2000) The Language of Politics, London and New York:
Routeledge. Bernstein, B. (1971) “Social Class, Language and Socialisation”, in Bernstein, B. Cla ss, Codes and Controle. Vol. I. London: Routeledge, pp. 59-67. Bevitori, C. (2004) “Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian parlia mentary debates”, in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Par liamentary Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins PC, pp. 87-109. Bhatia, V. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman. Bianchini, V. (2008) “Discussion in Parliament. History, Features and Variations”. Pa per presented at the Second ECPR Graduate Conference in Barcelona, 25-27 August, 2008. Retrieved on 1.9.2009: http ://www. essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/graduateconference/barcelona/papers/633 .pdf Biber, D. et al. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Lon don: Longman. Bijeikiené, V. and Utka, A. (2007) “Gender-related Linguistic Stereotypes in Lithua nian Parliamentary Discourse”, in Apanavičius, R. (ed.) Humanities in New Europe, 2, pp. 423^130. Billig, M. (2008) “The Language of Critical Discourse Analy sis: The Case of Nomina lisation”, in Discourse Society, 19 (6), pp. 783-800. Blackledge, A. (2005) Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Blagojević, S. (2009) „Expressing Attitudes in Academic Research Articles Written by 268
English and Serbian Authors”, in Facta Universitatis (Series: Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), pp. 63-73. Blakemore, D. (2007) “Discourse Markers”, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 220-240. Blommaert, J. (2005) “Theory and Methodology: Norman Fairclough”, in Blommaert, J. Discourse: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 28-31. Blommaert, J. (2005b) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Bonelli, E. T. (2010) “Theoretical Overview of the Evolution of Corpus Linguistics”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. The Routeledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Abington/New York: Routeledge, pp. 14-27. Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Translated by Nice, R. Stanford: Standford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (2006) “Language and Symbolic Power”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 473-480. Boyd, M. (2009) “De-constructing Race and Identity in US Presidential Discourse: Barack Obama’s Speech on Race”, in Atlantis, December 2009, pp. 75-74. Bratić, V. and Vukovič Stamatović, M. (2017) “Commodification of Women through Conceptual Metaphors: The Metaphor woman as a car in the Western Balkans”, in Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (ed.) Gender and Language, 11(1), pp. 51-76. Brekle, H. (1989) “War with Words”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 81-93. Brewer, N. (1987) Modality And Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of the English Modal Auxiliaries. PhD thesis.
Leeds: University of Leeds. Brizuela, M, Andersen, E. and Stallings, L. (1999) “Discourse Markers as Indicators of Register”, Hispánia, 82 (1), pp. 128-141. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (2006) “Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (ed.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 311-323. Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. Bugarski, R. (1995) Uvod u opštu lingvistiku. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastav na sredstva. Bull, P. (2003) The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Am biguity. New York: Routeldge. Bull, P. (2007) “Political Language and Persuasion”, in Weatherall, A., Watson, B. and Gallois, C. (eds.) Language, Discourse and Social Psychology, Basingstoke/ New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 255-275. Bull, P. (2008) “Slipperiness, Evasion and Ambiguity: Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse”, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (4), pp. 333-344. Butler, J. (2006) “Burning Acts, Injurious Speech”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 499-506. Cano Mora, L. (2003) “At the Risk of Exaggerating: How do Listeners React to Hyper bole”, in Anglogermanica Online. Retrieved on 15.12.2009: http://anglogermanica.uv.es:8080/Joumal/Viewer.aspx?Year=2003֊04 ID=cano.pdf 269
Cap, P. (2008) “Towards the Proximisation Model of the Analysis of Legitimisation in Political Discourse”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp. 17-41. Capone, A. (2008) “On Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech”, in International Journal of Language and Communication, 27, pp. 87-122. Carbó, T. (2004) “Parliamentary Discourse When Things Go Wrong: Mapping Histo ries, Contexts, Conflicts”, in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins PC, pp. 301-337. Chafe, W. (1986) “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”, in Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epi stemology, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 261-272. Chantrill, P. and Mio, J. (1996) “Metonymy in Political Discourse”, in Mio, J. and Katz, A. (eds.) Metaphor: Implications and Applications, New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates Publishers, 171-184. Charteris-Black, J. (2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The persuasive power of me taphor, Basingstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (1997) “Discourse and Politics”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction - Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Voi. 2, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 206-230. Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (2002) “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John
Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-44. Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (2002b) Politics as Text and Talk, Amsterdam and Phi ladelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse, London New York: Routeledge. Chourliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethin king Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Christensen, W. and Ferree, M. (2008) “Cowboy of the World? Gender Discourse and the Iraq War Debate”, in Qualitative Sociology: Special Issue on Political Vi olence, 31 (3), pp. 287-306. dayman, S. (2001) “Answers and Evasion”. Retrieved on 5/6/2008: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/clayman/docs/AnswersandEvasions .pdf Coulthard, M. (ed.) (1992) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge. Collins, P. (2009) Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. Crystal, D. (2008) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Cucchi, C. (2007) “An Investigation of General Extenders in a Corpus of EU Par liamentary Debates”, in Davies, M. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference CL2007, University of Birmingham (UK), 27-30 July 2007. Retrieved on 3.03.2010: http://corpus.bham.ac.uk/corplingproceedings07/paper/242_Paper.pdf Curzon, G. (2007) Modern Parliamentary Eloquence, London: Yoakum Press. 270
Čomski, N. (1979) Gramatika i um. Beograd/Nolit. Crompton, P. (1997) “Hedging in Academic Writing: Theoretical Problems”, in En glish for Specific Purposes, 16(4), pp. 271-287. David, M. and et al. (2009) “Levels of Politeness in Malaysian Parliamentary Discour se”, in Language in India, 9, pp. 1-31. Retrived on 3.3.2010: http://www.languageinindia.com/sep2009/politenessmalaysiaparliament.pdf De Ayala (2001) “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? Politeness in Question Time”, in Journal of Pragmatics, Oxford: Elsevier, 33(2), pp. 143-169. De Beaugrande (1997) “The Story of Discourse Analysis”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Dis course as Structure and Process, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 35-63. De Beaugrande, R. (2006), “Critical discourse analysis: History, Ideology, Metho dology”, in Studies in Language Capitalism, pp. 29-56. Retrieved on 20.12.2009: http://semiotics.nured.uowm.gr/pdfs/Beaugrande.pdf De Beaugrande, R. (2008) “The Discourse and Counter-Discourse of Huge Chavez”, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 2 (1), pp. 17-30. Dedaić, M. (2005) “Ironic Denial: Tobože in Croatian Political Discourse”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 37, pp. 667-683. Dibattista, D. (2004) “Legitimising and Informative Discourse in the Kosovo Debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies”, in Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 151-184. Dupret, B. and Feriié, J. (2008) “Legislation at the Shopfloor Level: Background Knowledge
and Relevant Context of Parliamentary Debates”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp. 960-978. Edelman, M. (1974) “The Language of Politics”. Retrieved on 9.1.2010: http://www. eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp7_ nfpb=true _ ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED098789 ERICExtSear ch_SearchType_0=no accno=ED098789 Edelman, M. (1977) Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail. New York: Academic Press. Edwards, J. and Valenzano, J. (2007) “Bill Clinton’s New Partnership Anecdote: Towards a Post-Cold War Foreign Policy Rhetoric”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 6 (3), pp. 303-325. Eemeren, F. et al. (2002) Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Eggins, S. (2004) “An Overview of Systemic Functional Linguistics”, in Eggins, S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, London/New York: Continuum, pp. 1-23. Eira, C. (2005) “Obligatory Intertextuality and Proscribed Plagiarism: Intersections and Contradictions for Research Writing”. Paper presented at the 2nd AsiaPacific Educational Integrity Conference at the University of New Castle, Au stralia, 3-5 December. Retrieved on 1.1.2010: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/conference/apeic/papers_pdf/eira_0514_edd.pdf Elspass, S. (2002) “Phraseological Units in Parliamentary Discourse”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to 271
Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 81-110. Ensink, T. (1997) “The Footing of a Royal Address: An Analysis of Represantitiveness in Political Speech, Exemplified in Queen Beatrix’s Address to the Knesset on March 28, 1995”, in Schaffner, C. (ed.) Analysing Political Speech, Clevedon/ Philadelphia/Toronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 5-32. Evinson, J. (2010) “What are the Basics of Analysing a corpus?”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Abingdon/New York: Routeledge, pp. 122-135. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995b) Media Discourse. London, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold. Fairclough, N. (1996) “Critical Analysis of Media Discourse”, in Marris, P. and Thomtam, S. (eds.) Media Studies, a Reader, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Pre ss, pp. 308-325. Fairclough, N. (2000) “Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research: The Discourse of Welfare Reform”, in Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), pp. 163-195. Fairclough, N. (2001) “The Dialectics of Discourse”, in Textus, 14 (2), pp. 231-242. Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse. London and New York: Routeledge. Fairclough, N. (2005) “Blair’s contribution to elaborating a new ‘doctrine of internati onal community”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 4 (1), pp. 41-63. Fairclough, N. (2005b) “Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Marges Linguistiques, 9, pp. 76-94.
Retrieved on: 25.12.2009: http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/norman/critdiscanalysis.doc Fenton-Smith, B. (2008) “Discourse Structure and Political Performance in Adversa rial Parliamentary Questioning”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7(1), pp. 99-120. Ferrari, F. (2007) “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investiga ting a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy”, Discourse Society, 18 (5), pp. 603-625. Fetzer, A. and Bull, P. (2008) “Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence: The Strategic Use of Pronouns in Political Interviews”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (2), pp. 271-289. Fetzer, A. (2008) “‘And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing with It’ : The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse”, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), pp. 384-396. Fezter, A. (2002) “Put Bluntly, You Have Something of a Credibilility Problem”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Be njamins Publishing Company, pp. 173-202. Fetzer, A. (2003) “Reformulations and Common Ground”. Paper presented at the Eight International Pragmatics Conference of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) in Toronto, 2003. Retrieved on 1.09.2009: http://sws.bu.edu/bfraser/Reformulation%20Marker%20Papers/Fetzer%20 -%20RF%20 %20Common%20Ground.doc 272
Fintel, К. and Iatridou, S. (2008) “How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals”, in Gueron, J. and Lecarme, J. (eds.) Time and Mo dality, Berling: Springer, pp. 115-142. Fløttum, К. and Stenvoll, D. (2009) “Blair speeches in a polyphonic perspective: NOTs and BUTs in visions on Europe”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 8(2), pp. 269-286. Foucault, M. (2006) “The Incitement to Discourse”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 491-499. Franklin, B. (1994) Packaging Politics. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold. Frantz, R. (2003) “In defense of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Working Papers in TESOL Applied Linguistics, New York: Teachers College, Columbia Uni versity, 3 (2). Retrieved on: 15.12.2009: http://www.tc.edu/tesolalwebjoumal/Frantz.pdf Fraser, B. (2010) “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging”, in Kalenbock et al. (eds.) New Approaches to Hedging, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 15-34. Framuselu, M. and Ilie, C. (2010) “Pseudo-Parliamentary Discourse in a Communist Dictatorship: Dissenter Pârvulescu vs. Dictator Ceauşescu”, in Journal of Pra gmatics, 42, pp. 924-942. Gadavanij, S. (2002) “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Con fidence Debates in Thailand”, in Nelson, D. (ed.) Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, pp. 35-55. Gastil, J. (1992) “Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Po litical Discourse”, in Discourse Society, 3, pp. 469-500. Gee, J. P. (2005) An Introduction to Discourse
Analysis - Theory and Method. London and New York: Routeledge. Gelabert-Desnoyer, J. (2008) “Not So Impersonal: Intentionality in the Use of Prono un Uno in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse”, in Pragmatics, 18 (3), pp. 407-424. Goatly, A. (1997) The Language of Metaphors. London: Routeledge. Goddard, A. (2002) The Language of Advertising. London and New York: Routeledge. Goddard, C. (1996) “Cross-Linguistic Research on Metaphor”, in Language Communication, 16(2), pp. 145-151. Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (1997) “Discourse and Culture”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction - Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Voi. 2, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 231-257. Goffman, E. (2006) “On Facework: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interac tion”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (ed.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 299-310. Gräber, D. (1976) “Verbal Behaviour of Political Elites” in Gräber, D. Verbal Beha viour and Politics, Chicago: University of Illionois, pp. 174-213. Graddol, D. and Boyd-Barrett, O. (eds.) (1994) Media Texts: Authors and Readers, Philadelphia: The Open University. Graesser, C. et al. (1997) “Cognition”, inVan Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 292-319. 273
Grice, H. P. (2006) “Logic and Conversation”, in Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 76-88. Griffiths, P. (2006) An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Grimshaw, A. (2003) “Genres, Registers and Contexts of Discourse”, in Graesser, A. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 25-82. Haig, E. (2004) “Some Observations on the Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Studies in Language and Culture, 25(2): pp. 129-149. Halmari, H. (2008) “On the Language of the Clinton-Dole Presidential Campaign De bates: General Tendencies and Successful Strategies”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (2), pp. 247-270. Halmi, A., Belušić, R. i Ogresta, J. (2004) „Sociokonstruktivistički pristup analizi me dijskog diskursa“, u Medijskim istraživanjama, 10 (2), տէր. 35-50. Harris, S. (2001) “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adver sarial Political Discourse”, in Discourse Society, 12(4), pp. 451-472. Harris, S. et al. (2006) “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies”, in Discourse Soci ety, 17(6), pp. 715-737. Harris, Z. (1952) “Discourse Analysis”, in Language, 28(1), pp. 1-30. Hart, C. (2005) “Analysing Political Discourse: Toward a cognitive approach”, in Cri tical Discourse Studies, 2 (2), pp. 189-94. Henderson, R. (2005) “A Faircloughian Approach to CDA: Principled Eclecticism or a Method Searching for a Theory?”, in Melbourne Studies in Education, 46 (2),pp. 9-24. Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1986)
“Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences”, in American Journal of Sociology, 92 (1), pp. 110-157. Hodge, R. and Gunther, K. (1993) Language as Ideology. London and New York: Routeledge. Hodges, A (2008) “The Dialogic Emergence of ‘Truth’ in Politics: Reproduction and Subversion of the ‘War on Terror’ Discourse”. Retrieved on 10.08.2008: www.colorado.edu/ling/CRIL/Volume21 Issue 1 /paperHODGES .pdf Holly (1989) “Credibility and Political Language”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 115-35. Højer, Andreas (2008) The Battle of Hearts and Minds: An Analysis of the Iraq War Discourse in Politics and Newspapers, Tromsø: Tromsø University. Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) (2007) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Horn, L. (2007) “Implicature”, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 3-28. Huckin, T. (2002) “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Discourse of Condescension”, in Barton, E. and Stygall, H. (eds.) Discourse Studies in Composition, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 155-176. Hunston, S. (2006) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam and Phila delphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 274
Hyland, К. (2005) Metadiscourse. London and New York: Continuum. Die, C. (1999) “Disagreement about agreement: key word polarization in parliamen tary debates”, in Lineli, P. et al. (eds.), Samtal och språkanvändning i pro fessionerna. Rapport från ASLA:s Һ5stsymposium, Linköping, 6-7 November 1997, Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 111-122. Ilie, C. (2000) “Cliché-based Metadiscursive Argumentation in the Houses of Parlia ment”, in International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), pp. 65-84. Ilie, C. (2003a) “Parenthetically Speaking: Parliamentary Parentheticals as Rhetorical Strategies”, in Bondi, M. and Stati, S. (eds.) Dialogue Analysis 2000: Selected Papers from the 10th IADA Anniversary Conference, Bologna, 2000, Tübin gen: Niemeyer, pp. 253-264. Ilié, C. (2003b) “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), pp. 71-92. Ilié, C. (2003c) “Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse”, in Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(1), pp. 25-33. Ilié, C. (2004) “Insulting as (Unparliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach”, Bayley, P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Per spectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 45-86. Ilié, C. (2005) “Politeness in Sweden: Parliamentary forms of address”, in Hickey, L. and Stewart, M. (eds.) Politeness in Europe, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 174-188. Ilié, C. (2006) “Parliamentary Discourses”, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Lan guage and Linguistics, Voi. 2,
Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 188-197. Ilié, C. (2010) “Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), pp.885-911. Ilié, C. (2010b) “Analytical Perspectives on Parliamentary and Extra-parliamentary Discourses”, in Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 879-884. Ivić, M. (1983) Pravci u lingvistici. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije. Ivić, M. (2003) „O srpskim partikularna pa і та iz perspektive ‘fativne’ і ‘reaktivne’ ñinkcije jezika”, u Zborniku Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku, 46(1), Տէր. 15-21. Janks, H. (1997) “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool”, in Discourse: Stu dies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18 (3), pp. 329-342. Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) (2006) The Discourse Reader. London and New York: Routeledge. Jørgemsen, M. and Philips. L. (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage. Jones, J. andPeccei, J. (2007) “Language and Politics”, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 35-55. Jose, J. and Moore, T. (2007) “The Concept ‘Governance’ within Parliamentary Dis course 1983-93”. Paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Associa tion Conference, Melbourne, 24-25 September, 2007. Retrieved on 3.03.2010: http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/psi/news-and-events/apsa/refereed-papers/aunz-politics/jose_moore.pdf 275
Kehler, A. (2007) “Discourse Coherence”, in Horn, L. and Wand, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 241-265. Kendall, G. and Wickham, G. (2006) “Problems with the Critical Posture? Foucault and Critical Discourse Analysis” in C. Hopkinson and C. Hall (eds.) Social Change in the 21st Century. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology (electronic publication). Kennedy, G. (2003) “Amplifier Collocations in the British National Corpus”, in Tesol Quarterly, 37 (3), pp. 467-488. Klajn, I. (2000) „Lice kao gramatička i komunikacijska kategorija“, u Klajn. I. Lingvi stičke studije, Beograd: Partenon, տէր. 88-105. Klajn, I. (2005) Gramatika srpskog jezika. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. Knowles, M. and Moon, R. (2006) Introducing Metaphor. London and New York: Routeledge. Komlósi, L. and Tarrósy, I. (2010) “Presumptive Arguments Turned into a Fallacy of Presumtuousness: Pre-election Debates in a Democracy of Promises”, in Jour nal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 957-972. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006) “Visual Interaction“, in Jaworski, A. and Cou pland, N. (eds.) The Discourse Reader, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 362-384. Lakič, I. (1999) Analiza žanra. Univerzitet Cme Gore: Podgorica. Lakič, I. (2011) Jezik, mediji, rat. Univerzitet Сте Gore: Podgorica. Lakoff, G. (1995) “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust”. Retrieved on 27.1.2010: http://www.wwcd.org/issues/Lakoff.html Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003) Metaphors We Live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2003b) “Metaphor and War, Again”. Retrieved on 27.01.2010: http://www. altemet.org/story/15414/?page=entire Lakoff, G. (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company. Leudar, I. et al. (2004) “On Membership Categorisation: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Vi olence’ in Political Discourse”, in Discourse Society, 15(2-3), pp. 243-266. Lillian, D. (2008) “Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse”, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Discplines, 2(l),pp. 1-16. Lorda, C. (2010) “A Consensual Topic: The French and Spanish Parliaments against Domestic Violence”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 943-956. Luke, A. (2002) “Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Dis course Analysis”, in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, pp. 96-110. Majstorovič, D. (2007) „Moćni očevi i grešna djeca: analiza diskursa visokog pred stavnika“, Puls demokratije. Pristupljeno 29.01.2010: http://www.pulsdemokratije.net/admin/files/Majstorovic%200HR%20diskur%20Za%20postavljanje%2023juli07.doc Markkanen, R. and Schröder, H. (1997) “Hedging: A Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis”, in Markkanen, R. and Schröder, H. (eds.) Hedging and Discourse, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 3-20. 276
Martin Martin, P. (2008) “The Mitigation of Scientific Claims in Research Papers: A Comparative Study”, in International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), pp. 133-152. Matthiessen, C. and Halliday, M. (2009) “Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory”. Retrieved on 28.1.2010: http ://web .mac. com/cmatthie/iWeb/SMMG_resources/Sy dney_2007_SFL_Libraryfiles/SFGFirstStepll .pdf Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. (2001) Using English from Conversation to Canon. Lon don and New York: Routeledge. Maybin, J. (2001) “Everyday Talk”, in Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. Using English from Conversation to Canon. London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 5-27. McCarthy, M. (1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers, Cambridge: CUP. McCarthy, M. (2001) Issues in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. McCarthy, M. and O’Keeffe, A. (2010) “What are Corpora and How have They Evol ved?”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Abingdon/New York: Routeledge, pp. 3-13. Meadows, B. (2007) “Distancing and Showing Solidarity via Metaphor and Metonymy in Political Discourse: A Critical Study of American Statements on Iraq during the Years 2004-2005”, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1 (2), pp. 1-17. Meyer, C. (2004) English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Mihas, E. (2005) “Non-literal Language in Political Discourse”, in LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, pp. 124-139. Mills, S. (2004) Discourse. London and New York: Routeledge. Mitsikopolou, B. (2008) “The Branding of Political Entities as
Discursive Practice”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (3), pp. 353-371. Moreno, M. (2008) Metaphors in Hugo Chavez’s Political Discourse: Conceputalising Nation, Revolution and Opposition. New York: City University of New York. Mrazović, P. i Vukadinović, Z. (1990) Gramatika srpskohrvatskog jezika za strance. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižamica Z. Stanojeviča i Novi Sad: Dobra vest. Mülhäusler, P. (1995) “Metaphors Others Live by”, in Language Communication, 15 (3), pp. 281-288. Müller, R. (2005) “Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical Conside rations on the Basis of Swiss Speeches”, in Metaphoric.de, 9. Retrieved on 14.1.2010: www.metaphorik.de/09/mueller.pdf Muntigl, P. (2002) “Politization and Depolitization: Employment Policy in the Euro pean Union”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 45-80. Musolff, A. (2004) Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in De bates about Europe. Basingstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Nuyts, J. (2001) Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualisation. Amster dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Odouri, R. (2002) “Language and Politics in Kenya: Restricted and Elaborated Co des”, in Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1 (4), pp. 434-441. 277
O’Halloran, К. (2010) “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in the Study of Media Dis course”, in O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon/New York: Routeledge, pp. 563-577. O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) (2010) The Routeledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon/New York: Routeledge. Orpin, D. (2005) “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Internati onal Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10 (1), pp. 37-61. Orwell, G. (1946) “Politics and the English Language”, in Complete Works of Geor ge Orwell. Retrieved on 7.1.2010: http://www.george-orwell.Org/Politics_and_the_English_Language/0.html Ostojič, В. (1999) Kratka pregledna gramatika srpskog jezika. Zemun: Nijansa. Palmer, F. (1988) The English Verb. London/New York: Longman. Palmer, F. (2001) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parkin, D. (1984) “PoEtical Language”, in Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, pp. 345-365. Partington, A. (2003) The Linguistics of Political Argument. London: Routledge. Perovič, S. (2009) Jezik u akciji. Podgorica: CID. Perovič, S. (ur.) (2014) Analiza diskursa: teorije і metode. Institut za strane jezike: Podgorica. Perovič, S. (2017) Pojmovna metafora kulturno srodnih pojmova. CANU: Podgorica. Pešič, J. (1997) „Analiza diskursa і njen odnos s psihologijom“, u Psihologija, 3, str. 263-278. Pikalo, J. (2008) „Mechanical Metaphors in Politics“, in Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. Poli tical Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. Lon don and New York: Routeledge, pp. 41-54. Piper, P. et al.
(2005) Sintaksa savremenog srpskog jezika. Beograd: SANU, Beo gradska knjiga i Matica srpska. Piper, P. (2008) „Imenska grupa u slovenačkom jeziku (u poređenju sa srpskim)”, u Zborniku Matice srpske za slavistiku, 74, str. 147-171. Pridham, F. (2001) The Language of Conversation. London: Routeledge. Pu, C. (2007) “Discourse Analysis of President Bush’s Speech at Tsinghua University, China”, in International Communication Studies, XVI, pp. 205-215. Quirk et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman. Rađić-Bojanić, B. i Silaški, N. (2008) „Sportizacija političkog diskursa ֊ kako meta fore prikrivaju političku stvarnost Srbije“, u Zborniku Matice srpske za filo logiju i lingvistiku, LI/1-2, str. 139-155. Rasiah, P. (2007) Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time. Perth: Uni versity of Western Australia. Rasiah, P. (2010) “A Framework for the Systematic Analysis of Evasion in Parliamen tary Discourse”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 664-680. Rečnik srpskohrvatskoga književnog jezika (1967) Novi Sad: Matica srpska, Za greb: Matica hrvatska. Renkema, J. (2004) Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia/ New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 278
Richards, К. and Seedhouse, R (eds.) (2007) Applying Conversation Analysis, Ba singstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Rindler Schjerve, R. (1989) “The Political Speech of Futurism and Its Relationship to Italian Fascism”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amster dam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 57-81. Rojo, L. M. and van Dijk, T. (1997) ‘“There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Dis course”, in Discourse Society, 8(4): pp. 532-566. Saddock, J. (2007) “Speech Acts”, in Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 53-73. Safire, W. (2008) Safire’s Political Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994) “Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical En glish Written Discourse” in English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), pp. 149-171. Salkie, R. (1995) Text and Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge. Santibanez, C. (2010) “Metaphors and Argumentation: The Case of Chilean Parlia mentarian Media Participation”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 973-989. Sauer, C. (1989) “Structures of Consensus-making and Intervention: the Concept of Nazi Language Policy in Occupied Holland”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishi ng Company, pp. 3-39. Sauer, C. (1997) “Echoes from Abroad - Speeches for Domestic Audience: Queen Beatrix’s Address to the Israeli Parliament”, in Schaffner, C. (ed.) Analysing Political Speech,
Clevedon/Philadelphia/Toronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Mul tilingual Matters LTD, pp. 33-67. Savoy, J. (2009) “Lexical Analysis of Obama’s and McCain’s Speeches”. Retrieved on 15.1.2010: http://members.unine.ch/jacques.savoy/Papers/ Schaffner, C. (1997) “Editorial: Political Speeches and Discourse Analysis”, in Schaffner, C. (ed.) Analysing Political Speech, Clevedon/Philadelphia/ Toron to/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 1-4. Schaffner, C. (ed.) (1997b) Analysing Political Speech. Clevedon/Philadelphia/ To ronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD. Schaffner, C. (2004) “Political Discourse Analysis from the Point of View of Transla tion Studies”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 3 (1), pp. 117-150. Searle, J. (1968) “Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts”, in The Philosophi cal Review, 77 (4), pp. 405-424. Seedhouse, P. (2007) “Conversation Analysis as Research Methodology”, in: Richar ds, K. and Seedhouse, P. (eds.) Applying Conversation Analysis. Basingsto ke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 251-266. Semino, E. and Masei, M. (1996) “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy”, in Discourse Society, 7 (2), pp. 243-269. Shenhav, S. (2008) “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament”, in Dis course and Society, 19(2), pp. 223-255. Sheyholislami, J. (2001) Yesterday’s “Separatists” are Today’s “Resistance Fighters. Ottawa: Carleton University. 279
Shi-xu (2005) “Discourse and Reality”, in Shi-xu, A Cultural Approach to Discour se, Basingstoke/New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 13-41. Silaški, N., Đurović, T. i Radić-Bojanić, В. (2009) Javni diskurs Srbije. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta u Beogradu. Silaški, N. i Đurović, T., (2010) “The Conceptualisation of the Global Financial Crisis via the Economy Is a Person Metaphor -A Contrastive Study of English and Serbi an“, Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature, 8(2): pp. 129-139. Silić, J. i Pranjković, I. (2005) Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Simić, R. (2002) Srpska gramatika. Beograd: Naučno društvo za negovanje i prou čavanje srpskog jezika; Nikšić: Jasen. Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (1997) “Modal (Un)Certainty in Political Discourse: A Func tional Account”, in Language Sciences, 19 (4): 341-356. Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (1997b) “Meanings of I think, a Study Based on Parallel Corpora” in Quarterly Newsletter of the Contrastive Grammar Research Group of the University of Gent. Retrieved on 31.07.2010: http://www.contragram.ugent.be/index.php?id=20 type=content anchor=TH INK#THINK Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2001) “The Functions of I Think in Political Discourse”, in International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), pp. 41-63. Simon-Vandenbergen, A., White, P. and Aijmer, K. (2007) “Presupposition and ‘Taking-for-Granted in Mass communicated Political Argument”, in Fetzer, A. and Lauerbach, G. (eds.) Political Discourse in the Media, Amsterdam and Phila delphia: John Benjanmins Publishing Company, pp. 31-75.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2007b) The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Cor pus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2008) “Almost Certainly and Most Definitely. Degree Modi fiers and Epistemic Stance”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), pp. 1521-1542. Šimunić, Z. (2008) “Deiktička referencija i generičko strukturiranje diskursa“, u Ra spravama Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 34, str. 371-391. Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1992) “Towards an Analysis of Discourse”, in Coutlhard, M. (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge, pp. 1-35. Sinclair, J. (1992) “Priorities in Discourse Analysis”, in Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routeledge, pp. 79-88. Sinclair, J. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London and New York: Routeledge. Škara, D. (2009) “Jezična/mentalna rekonstrukcija EU prostora: nove konceptualne metafore”, u Bratanic, M. (ur.) Hrvatski na putu u EU, Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada, str. 1-28. Pristupljeno 25.1.2010: http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/413894.maja.lanak.doc Somig, К. (1989) “Some Remarks on Linguistic Strategies of Persuasion”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 95-115. Sosir, F. (1969) Opšta lingvistika. Beograd: Nolit. Stanojčić, Ž. і Popovič, Lj. (1992) Gramatika srpskog jezika. Beograd, Novi Sad: Zavod za udžbenike і nastavna sredstva. 280
Stevanovič, M. (1986) Savremeni srpskohrvatski jezik. Beograd: Naučna knjiga. Stevič, S. (1997) Analiza konverzacije. Beograd: Filološki fakultet. Stockwell, P. (2002) Sociolinguistics. London and New York: Routeledge. Švabić, Š. (2004) “Mitologije kao konstitutivan element suvremenog političkog dis kursa”, u Časopisu za interdisciplinarna istraživanja rata i mira, 7 (13-14), Տէր. 177-192. Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis, Cambridge: CUP. Takahashi, H. (2010) “Central Banking as “Fluid Dynamics”: A Comparative Study of English and Japanese Metaphors of Money”, in Language Research Bulletin, 25, pp. 1-18. Tannen, D. (2005) Conversational Style: Analysing Talk among Friends. New York: Oxford University Press. Tetlock, P. (1984) “Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons”, in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (2), pp. 365-375. Threadgold, T. (2003) “Cultural Studies, Critical Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis: Histories, Remembering and Futures”, in Homscheidt, A. (ed.) Lin guistik Online, 14/2003, pp. 5-37. Tomlin, R. et al. (1997) “Discourse Semantics”, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publicati ons, pp. 63-111. Trbojević-Milošević, L (2004) Modalnost, sud, iskaz: epistemička modalnost u en gleskom i srpskom jeziku. Beograd: Filološki fakultet. Vaara, E. et al. (2006) “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Glo bal Industrial Restructuring”, in Organisation Studies, 27 (6), pp. 789-810. Vaara, E. and Monin, P. (2010) “A Recursive
Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organisational Action in Mergers and Acquisitions”, in Organisational Science, 21 (1), pp. 3-22. van der Valk, L (2003) “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in Fran ce”, in Discourse and Society, 14 (3), pp. 309-348. van Dijk, T. (1980) “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Functional Coherence in Dis course”, in Versus, pp. 49-65. van Dijk, T. (1985) “Semantic Discourse Analysis”, inVan Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Voi. 2, London: Academic Press, pp. 103-136. van Dijk, T. (1985b) “Introduction: Discourse Analysis as a New Cross-Discipline”, in Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 1, London/Orlando: Academic press, pp. 1-10. van Dijk, T. (1989) “Social Congition and Discourse”, in Giles, H. and Robinson P. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology and Language, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 163-183. van Dijk, T. (1993) “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Discourse Soci ety, London: Sage, 4 (2), pp. 249-283. van Dijk, T. (1993b) “Discourse and Cognition in Society”, in Crowley D. and Mitchell D. (eds.) Communication Theory Today, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 107-126. van Dijk, T. (1995) “Ideological Discourse Analysis”, In Ventola, E. and Solin, A. (eds.), New Courant: Special Issue Interdisciplinary approaches to dis281
course analysis, pp. 135-161. Retrieved on 7.02.2010: http://www.discourses.org/01dArticles/Ideological%20discourse%20analysis.pdf van Dijk, T. (1997) “Political Discourse and Racism. Describing Others in Western Parliaments”, in Riggins, S. (ed.), The Language and Politics of Exclusion, Others in Discourse, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 31-64. van, Dijk. T (ed.) (1997b) Discourse as Structure and Process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications. van, Dijk. T. (1997c) “The Study of Discourse”, in van, Dijk T. (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publicati ons, pp.1-34. van Dijk, T. (2000) “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration”, in Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (eds.) The semiotics of racism. Approaches to critical discourse analysis, Vienna: Passagen Verlag, pp. 85-103. van Dijk, T. (2001) “Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Tannen, D. et al. (eds.), Handbo ok of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 352-371. van Dijk, T. (2002) “Political Discourse and Political Cognition”, in Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Po litical Discourse, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 203-234. van Dijk, T. (2003) “Political Discourse and Ideology”, in Lorda, C. and Ribas, M. (eds.), Anàlisi del discurs politic, Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, IULA, pp. 207-225. van Dijk, T. (2003b) Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: Ariel. Retrieved on 2.1.2010. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24649432/Van-
Dijk-Ideology-and-Discourse-AMultidisciplinary-Introduction van Dijk, T. (2003c) “Knowledge in Parliamentary Debates”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), pp. 93-129. van Dijk, T. (2004) “Politics, Ideology and Discourse”. Retrieved on 1.02.2008: http:// www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Politics,%20ideology20and%20discourse%20(ELL).htm van Dijk, T. (2004b) “Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates”, in Bayley, P. (ed.), Cross-cultural Perspective on Parliamentary Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 339-372. van Dijk, T. (2005) “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally. Political implicatures of Aznar’s Legitimization of the War in Iraq”, in Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), pp. 65-92. van Dijk, T. (2006) “Discourse and Manipulation”, in Discourse Society, London/ New Delhi: Sage Publications, 17 (2), pp. 359-383. van Dijk, T. (2008a) “Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalisation: Problem or Pseudo-Problem”, in Discourse Society, 19 (6), pp. 821-828. van Dijk, T. (2008b) “Discourse, Knowledge, Power and Politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis”. Lecture CADAAD 2008, Hertfordshire, 10-12 July 2008. Retrieved on 10.12.2009: http://www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Discourse,%20knowledge,%20power%20and%20politics.pdf 282
van Dijk, T. (2008c) “Contextualisation in Parliamentary Discourse: Aznar, Iraq and the Pragmatics of Lying”, in Van Dijk, T. Discourse and Power, Basingstoke/ New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 237-289. van Dijk, T. (s.a.) “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Retrieved on 15.4.2008: http://www. discourses.org/01dArticles/Critical%20discourse%20analysis.pdf van Leeuwen, M. (2008) “The Style of Political Speeches: Problems in Existing Met hods”, in Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association. Retrieved on 14.01.2010: http://www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2008/vanleeuwen2008.pdf Van Leeuwen, M. (2009) “Clear vs. Woolly Language Use in Political Speeches: The Case of the Controversial Dutch Politician Geert Wilders”, in Online Procee dings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association. Retrieved on 14.01.2010: www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2009/vanleeuwen2009.pdf van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999) “Legitimising Immigration Control: a Discour se-Historical Analysis”, in Discourse Studies, 1(1), pp. 83-118. van Leeuwen, T. (2007) “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication”, in Discour se and Communication, 1(1), pp. 91-112. van Leeuwen, T. (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Varttala, T. (1999) “Remarks on the Communicative Functions of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine”, in English for Speci fic Purposes, 18 (2), pp. 177-200. Vazques, I. and Giner, D. (2008) “Beyond Mood and
Modality: Epistemic Modality Markers as Hedges in Research Articles. A Cross-Disciplinary Study” in Revi sta Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, pp. 171-190. Velčić, M. (1987) Uvod u lingvistiku teksta. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Vukovič, M. (2009) Diskurs političkih intervjua u elektronskim medijima (magi starski rad). Filozofski fakultet: Nikšić. Vukovič, M. (2011a) „Personalnost u parlamentarnom diskursu: prvo lice množine”, u Sadžak, M. (ur.) Filolog, 3, Univerzitet u Banja Luci: Banja Luka, str. 192-201. Vukovič, M. (2011b) „Prvo lice jednine u crnogorskom parlamentarnom diskursu”, u Knežević, M. (ur.) Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, 3/4, Filozofski fakultet: Nikšić, տէր. 19-34. Vukovič, M. (2012a) “Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary dis course: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro“, in Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse Society, 23(2), Sage: Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington, pp. 184-202. Vukovič, M. (2012b) „Polarizacija diskursnih učesnika u parlamentarnim debatama”, u Polovina i Vučo (ur.) Zbornik radova konferencije „Filološka istraživanja danas” - Savremeni tokovi u lingvističkim istraživanjima (26. i 27.11.2010), knjiga 1. Filološki fakultet: Beograd, str. 63-76. Vukovič, M. (2013a) Diskurs parlamentarnih debata (doktorska disertacija). Filo zofski fakultet: Nikšić. Vukovič, M. (2013b) „Slaba epistemička modalnost u crnogorskom parlamentar nom diskursu”, Filolog, 7, Univerzitet u Banja Luci: Banja Luka, str. 65-76. 283
ISSN:2233-1158, UDK: 32.019.5:316.776.2] :811.163.41 (497.16, DOI: 10.725 1/FIL1307065V) Vukovič (2014а) „Kritička analiza diskursa“, u Perovič, S. (ur.) Analiza diskursa: teorije і metode. Podgorica: Institut za strane jezike, str. 97-114. Vukovič (2014b) „Analiza političkog diskursą“,u Perovič, S. (ur.) Analiza diskursa: teorije і metode. Podgorica: Institut za strane jezike, str. 213-248. Vukovič, M. (2014c) “Weak Epistemic Modality in the UK Parliamentary Discourse”, Logos Littera: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 1, Institute of Forei gn Languages: Podgorica, pp. 121-129. Vukovič, M. (2014d) “Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse”, Open Linguistics, 1(1), De Gruyter: Berlin and Boston, pp. 37-52. Vukovič, M. (2014e) “Jaka epistemička modalnost u parlamentarnom diskursu”, III konferencija Društva za primijenjenu lingvistiku - Primijenjena lingvistika u fokusu, DPLCG i ISJ: Podgorica, str. 117-132. Vukovič, M. (2014í) “The Discourse of the Economic Crisis: Health and Sickness Metaphors in the Montenegrin and the UK Parliament”, 4th International Con ference Applied Linguistics Today (ALT 4), Belgrade, 12-14 October, 2012, Primenjena lingvistika 14, pp. 51-62. Vukovič Starnatovič, M. (2016) “Scaling deontic modality in parliamentary discour se”, Logos Littera: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 3(2), Faculty of Philology: Podgorica, pp. 131-149. Vukovič Starnatovič, M. (2017) “Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in ti mes of crisis: the case of the uk and the monténégrin parliament“, Pragmatics Society 9(1), John Benjamins Publishing
Company, Amsterdam and Phila delphia, pp. 281-311. Vukovič Stamatović, М. i Bratić, V. (2018) “Conceptual Container Metaphors and En trapment in Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway”, Primerjalna književnost, 41(3), տէր. 141-164. Waddel, N. and McKenna, В.(2003) “The Colour of Political Rhetoric”. Retrieved on 15.7.2008: http://espace.library.uq.edu.aU/eserv/UQ:10933/colrhet.pdf Walker, C. (2004) “An Analysis of the Persuasive Devices Used in Two Speeches from Churchill during the Second World War, Compared with Those Used in Tony Blair’s Speeches at the Start of the War on Iraq”, Lancaster: Lancaster Univer sity. Retrieved on 3.8.2008: www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/courses/ling/ling20 l/res/diss/2004/walkerc01 .doc Ward, G. and Bimer, B. (2007) “Information Structure and Non-canonical Syntax”, in Hom, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 153-174. Wattles, I. and Radić-Bojanić, В. (2007) “The Analysis of an Online Debate ֊ The Syste mic Functional Grammar Approach”, in Facta Universitatis, 5 (1), pp. 47-58. Widdowson, H. (1979) “Approaches to Discourse”, in Widdowson, H. Explora tions in Applied Linguistics. Vol. I. Oxford: OUP, pp. 109-137. Retrieved on 15.03.2010: http://www.oup.com/elt/catalogue/guidance_articles/LoC_ Explorations?cc=global Widdowson, H. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Wilamova, S. (2005) “On the Function of Hedging Devices in Negatively Polite Dis284
course”, in Sborník prací Facultatis Filozofické Fakulty Brnenske Univer zity, Brno: Brno University, pp. 85-93. Retrived on 15.09.2009: http://www. phil.muni.cz/plonedata/wkaa/BSE/BSE_2005-31_Offprints/BSE%20200531 %20%28085-093%29%20Wilamova.pdf Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Lan guage. Oxford/Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. Wilson, J. (2003) “Political Discourse”, in Schriffin, D., Tannen D. and Hamilton, H. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 398-415. Wodak, R. (ed.) (1989) Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam and Phila delphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Wodak, R. (1989b) “Introduction”, in Wodak, R. (ed.) Language, Power and Ideo logy, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. XIII-XX. Wodak, R. (2002) “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Zeitschrift für An gewandte Linguistik, 36, pp. 5-31. Wodak, R. (2002b) “Friend or Foe: the Defamation or Legitimate and Necessary Cri ticism? Reflections on Recent Political Dicourse in Austria“, in Language Communication, 22, pp. 495-517. Wodak, R. (2007) “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry”, in Pragmatics Cognition, Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benja mins Publishing Company, 15 (1), pp. 203-225. Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Wooffitt, R. (2001) “Rhetoric in English”, in Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. (eds.) Using English: From Conversation to Canon, London and New York: Routeledge, pp. 122-144. Xiao, R.
and Tao, H. (2007) “A Corpus-Based Sociolingüístic Study of Amplifiers in British English”, in Sociolingüístic Studies, 1(2), pp. 241-273. Yetkin, N. (2006) “A Pragmatic Analysis of Derogation in the Discourse of Politi cal Criticism in the Turkish Grand National Assembly”, in Modern Türklük Araştırmaları Dergisi, Telif Hakki: Ankara, pp. 48-59. Young, L. and Harrison, C. (eds) (2004) Systemic Functional Linguistics. London/ New York: Continuum. Zgobliu, R. (2007) “The Function of Stylistic Features in Political Discourse”, in Stu dia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai ֊ Philologia, 2, pp. 219-226. Zima, E. et al. (2008) “Resonance Activation in Interactional Parliamentary Discour se”, in Ramm, W. and Fabricius-Hansen, C. Linearisation and Segmentation in Discourse. Oslo: University of Oslo, pp. 137-147. 285 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Vuković Stamatović, Milica |
| author_facet | Vuković Stamatović, Milica |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Vuković Stamatović, Milica |
| author_variant | s m v sm smv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047440178 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1289777807 (DE-599)BVBBV047440178 |
| edition | Prvo izdanje |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02432nam a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047440178</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211221 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210826s2020 yu a||| |||| 00||| cnr d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788676641864</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7664-186-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1289777807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047440178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cnr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">yu</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-ME</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vuković Stamatović, Milica</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diskurs parlamenta</subfield><subfield code="c">Milica Vuković Stamatović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prvo izdanje</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Podgorica</subfield><subfield code="b">Univerzitet Crne Gore</subfield><subfield code="c">2020.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">285 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biblioteka humanističkih nauka</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tiraž 300. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 267-285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parlament</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4044685-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Debatte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148952-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Rede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046554-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diskursanalyse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4194747-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Montenegro</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4040163-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Montenegro</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4040163-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Parlament</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4044685-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Politische Rede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046554-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Debatte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148952-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Diskursanalyse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4194747-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20211221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032842364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">49745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">41</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">417.7</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">49745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">417.7</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">49745</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd Montenegro (DE-588)4040163-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Großbritannien Montenegro |
| id | DE-604.BV047440178 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:00:53Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:12:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788676641864 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032842364 |
| oclc_num | 1289777807 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 285 Seiten Illustrationen |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20211221 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Univerzitet Crne Gore |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Biblioteka humanističkih nauka |
| spelling | Vuković Stamatović, Milica Verfasser aut Diskurs parlamenta Milica Vuković Stamatović Prvo izdanje Podgorica Univerzitet Crne Gore 2020. 285 Seiten Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Biblioteka humanističkih nauka Tiraž 300. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 267-285 Parlament (DE-588)4044685-2 gnd rswk-swf Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd rswk-swf Politische Rede (DE-588)4046554-8 gnd rswk-swf Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Montenegro (DE-588)4040163-7 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g Montenegro (DE-588)4040163-7 g Parlament (DE-588)4044685-2 s Politische Rede (DE-588)4046554-8 s Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 s Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 s DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Vuković Stamatović, Milica Diskurs parlamenta Parlament (DE-588)4044685-2 gnd Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd Politische Rede (DE-588)4046554-8 gnd Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4044685-2 (DE-588)4148952-4 (DE-588)4046554-8 (DE-588)4194747-2 (DE-588)4022153-2 (DE-588)4040163-7 |
| title | Diskurs parlamenta |
| title_auth | Diskurs parlamenta |
| title_exact_search | Diskurs parlamenta |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Diskurs parlamenta |
| title_full | Diskurs parlamenta Milica Vuković Stamatović |
| title_fullStr | Diskurs parlamenta Milica Vuković Stamatović |
| title_full_unstemmed | Diskurs parlamenta Milica Vuković Stamatović |
| title_short | Diskurs parlamenta |
| title_sort | diskurs parlamenta |
| topic | Parlament (DE-588)4044685-2 gnd Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd Politische Rede (DE-588)4046554-8 gnd Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Parlament Debatte Politische Rede Diskursanalyse Großbritannien Montenegro |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032842364&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vukovicstamatovicmilica diskursparlamenta |