Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate: The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa)
This volume makes available in English the seminal treatises in Korea's greatest interreligious debate of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On Mind, Material Force, and Principle and An Array of Critiques of Buddhism by Confucian statesman Chŏng Tojŏn (1342-1398) and Exposition of Orthodo...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Honolulu
University of Hawaii Press
[2015]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | FAB01 FAW01 FCO01 FHA01 FKE01 FLA01 UPA01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | This volume makes available in English the seminal treatises in Korea's greatest interreligious debate of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On Mind, Material Force, and Principle and An Array of Critiques of Buddhism by Confucian statesman Chŏng Tojŏn (1342-1398) and Exposition of Orthodoxy by Sŏn monk Kihwa (1376-1433) are presented here with extensive annotation. A substantial introduction provides a summary and analysis of the philosophical positions of both Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism as well as a germane history of the interactions between these two traditions in East Asia, offering insight into religious tensions that persist to this day.Translator A. Charles Muller shows how, from the time Confucianism and Buddhism met in China, these thought systems existed, along with Daoism, in a competing relationship that featured significant mutual influence. A confrontative situation eventually developed in China, wherein Confucian leaders began to criticize Buddhism. During the late-Koryŏ and early-Chosŏn periods in Korea, the Neo-Confucian polemic became the driving force in the movement to oust Buddhism from its position as Korea's state religion. In his essays, Chŏng drew together the gamut of arguments that had been made against Buddhism throughout its long history in Korea. Kihwa's essay met Neo-Confucian contentions with an articulate Buddhist response. Thus, in a rare moment in the history of religions, a true philosophical debate ensued. This debate was made possible based upon the two religions' shared philosophical paradigm: essence-function (ch'e-yong). This traditional East Asian way of interpreting society, events, phenomena, human beings, and the world understands all things to have both essence and function, two contrasting yet wholly contiguous and mutually containing components. All three East Asian traditions took this as their underlying philosophical paradigm, and it is through this paradigm that they evaluated and criticized each other's doctrines and practices.Specialists in philosophy, religion, and Korean studies will appreciate Muller's exploration of this pivotal moment in Korean intellectual history. Because it includes a broad overview of the interactive history of East Asian religions, this book can also serve as a general introduction to East Asian philosophical thought |
Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (192 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780824857271 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9780824857271 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047415602 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210812s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780824857271 |9 978-0-8248-5727-1 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780824857271 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780824857271 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1165607418 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047415602 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-1043 |a DE-1046 |a DE-858 |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 290 | |
100 | 1 | |a Muller, A. Charles |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate |b The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) |c A. Charles Muller; ed. by Robert E. Buswell |
264 | 1 | |a Honolulu |b University of Hawaii Press |c [2015] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (192 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion | |
500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021) | ||
520 | |a This volume makes available in English the seminal treatises in Korea's greatest interreligious debate of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On Mind, Material Force, and Principle and An Array of Critiques of Buddhism by Confucian statesman Chŏng Tojŏn (1342-1398) and Exposition of Orthodoxy by Sŏn monk Kihwa (1376-1433) are presented here with extensive annotation. A substantial introduction provides a summary and analysis of the philosophical positions of both Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism as well as a germane history of the interactions between these two traditions in East Asia, offering insight into religious tensions that persist to this day.Translator A. Charles Muller shows how, from the time Confucianism and Buddhism met in China, these thought systems existed, along with Daoism, in a competing relationship that featured significant mutual influence. A confrontative situation eventually developed in China, wherein Confucian leaders began to criticize Buddhism. | ||
520 | |a During the late-Koryŏ and early-Chosŏn periods in Korea, the Neo-Confucian polemic became the driving force in the movement to oust Buddhism from its position as Korea's state religion. In his essays, Chŏng drew together the gamut of arguments that had been made against Buddhism throughout its long history in Korea. Kihwa's essay met Neo-Confucian contentions with an articulate Buddhist response. Thus, in a rare moment in the history of religions, a true philosophical debate ensued. This debate was made possible based upon the two religions' shared philosophical paradigm: essence-function (ch'e-yong). This traditional East Asian way of interpreting society, events, phenomena, human beings, and the world understands all things to have both essence and function, two contrasting yet wholly contiguous and mutually containing components. | ||
520 | |a All three East Asian traditions took this as their underlying philosophical paradigm, and it is through this paradigm that they evaluated and criticized each other's doctrines and practices.Specialists in philosophy, religion, and Korean studies will appreciate Muller's exploration of this pivotal moment in Korean intellectual history. Because it includes a broad overview of the interactive history of East Asian religions, this book can also serve as a general introduction to East Asian philosophical thought | ||
546 | |a In English | ||
650 | 7 | |a HISTORY / Asia / Korea |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a Buddhism |z Korea |v Early works to 1800 | |
650 | 4 | |a Confucianism |z Korea |v Early works to 1800 | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious disputations |z Korea |v Early works to 1800 | |
700 | 1 | |a Buswell, Robert E. |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Tojŏn, Chŏng |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Tŭkt'ong, Hamhŏ |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032816481 | ||
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l FAB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l FCO01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l FKE01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182688278511616 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Muller, A. Charles |
author2 | Buswell, Robert E. Tojŏn, Chŏng Tŭkt'ong, Hamhŏ |
author2_role | edt ctb ctb |
author2_variant | r e b re reb c t ct h t ht |
author_facet | Muller, A. Charles Buswell, Robert E. Tojŏn, Chŏng Tŭkt'ong, Hamhŏ |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Muller, A. Charles |
author_variant | a c m ac acm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047415602 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780824857271 (OCoLC)1165607418 (DE-599)BVBBV047415602 |
dewey-full | 290 |
dewey-hundreds | 200 - Religion |
dewey-ones | 290 - Other religions |
dewey-raw | 290 |
dewey-search | 290 |
dewey-sort | 3290 |
dewey-tens | 290 - Other religions |
discipline | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9780824857271 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04959nmm a2200577zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047415602</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210812s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8248-5727-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780824857271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1165607418</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047415602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">290</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muller, A. Charles</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate</subfield><subfield code="b">The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa)</subfield><subfield code="c">A. Charles Muller; ed. by Robert E. Buswell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Honolulu</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Hawaii Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2015]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (192 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This volume makes available in English the seminal treatises in Korea's greatest interreligious debate of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On Mind, Material Force, and Principle and An Array of Critiques of Buddhism by Confucian statesman Chŏng Tojŏn (1342-1398) and Exposition of Orthodoxy by Sŏn monk Kihwa (1376-1433) are presented here with extensive annotation. A substantial introduction provides a summary and analysis of the philosophical positions of both Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism as well as a germane history of the interactions between these two traditions in East Asia, offering insight into religious tensions that persist to this day.Translator A. Charles Muller shows how, from the time Confucianism and Buddhism met in China, these thought systems existed, along with Daoism, in a competing relationship that featured significant mutual influence. A confrontative situation eventually developed in China, wherein Confucian leaders began to criticize Buddhism. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">During the late-Koryŏ and early-Chosŏn periods in Korea, the Neo-Confucian polemic became the driving force in the movement to oust Buddhism from its position as Korea's state religion. In his essays, Chŏng drew together the gamut of arguments that had been made against Buddhism throughout its long history in Korea. Kihwa's essay met Neo-Confucian contentions with an articulate Buddhist response. Thus, in a rare moment in the history of religions, a true philosophical debate ensued. This debate was made possible based upon the two religions' shared philosophical paradigm: essence-function (ch'e-yong). This traditional East Asian way of interpreting society, events, phenomena, human beings, and the world understands all things to have both essence and function, two contrasting yet wholly contiguous and mutually containing components. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">All three East Asian traditions took this as their underlying philosophical paradigm, and it is through this paradigm that they evaluated and criticized each other's doctrines and practices.Specialists in philosophy, religion, and Korean studies will appreciate Muller's exploration of this pivotal moment in Korean intellectual history. Because it includes a broad overview of the interactive history of East Asian religions, this book can also serve as a general introduction to East Asian philosophical thought</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HISTORY / Asia / Korea</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Buddhism</subfield><subfield code="z">Korea</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Confucianism</subfield><subfield code="z">Korea</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Religious disputations</subfield><subfield code="z">Korea</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buswell, Robert E.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tojŏn, Chŏng</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tŭkt'ong, Hamhŏ</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032816481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">FAB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">FCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">FKE01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047415602 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T17:55:38Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:11:31Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780824857271 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032816481 |
oclc_num | 1165607418 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
owner_facet | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
physical | 1 online resource (192 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | University of Hawaii Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion |
spelling | Muller, A. Charles Verfasser aut Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) A. Charles Muller; ed. by Robert E. Buswell Honolulu University of Hawaii Press [2015] © 2015 1 online resource (192 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021) This volume makes available in English the seminal treatises in Korea's greatest interreligious debate of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On Mind, Material Force, and Principle and An Array of Critiques of Buddhism by Confucian statesman Chŏng Tojŏn (1342-1398) and Exposition of Orthodoxy by Sŏn monk Kihwa (1376-1433) are presented here with extensive annotation. A substantial introduction provides a summary and analysis of the philosophical positions of both Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism as well as a germane history of the interactions between these two traditions in East Asia, offering insight into religious tensions that persist to this day.Translator A. Charles Muller shows how, from the time Confucianism and Buddhism met in China, these thought systems existed, along with Daoism, in a competing relationship that featured significant mutual influence. A confrontative situation eventually developed in China, wherein Confucian leaders began to criticize Buddhism. During the late-Koryŏ and early-Chosŏn periods in Korea, the Neo-Confucian polemic became the driving force in the movement to oust Buddhism from its position as Korea's state religion. In his essays, Chŏng drew together the gamut of arguments that had been made against Buddhism throughout its long history in Korea. Kihwa's essay met Neo-Confucian contentions with an articulate Buddhist response. Thus, in a rare moment in the history of religions, a true philosophical debate ensued. This debate was made possible based upon the two religions' shared philosophical paradigm: essence-function (ch'e-yong). This traditional East Asian way of interpreting society, events, phenomena, human beings, and the world understands all things to have both essence and function, two contrasting yet wholly contiguous and mutually containing components. All three East Asian traditions took this as their underlying philosophical paradigm, and it is through this paradigm that they evaluated and criticized each other's doctrines and practices.Specialists in philosophy, religion, and Korean studies will appreciate Muller's exploration of this pivotal moment in Korean intellectual history. Because it includes a broad overview of the interactive history of East Asian religions, this book can also serve as a general introduction to East Asian philosophical thought In English HISTORY / Asia / Korea bisacsh Buddhism Korea Early works to 1800 Confucianism Korea Early works to 1800 Religious disputations Korea Early works to 1800 Buswell, Robert E. edt Tojŏn, Chŏng ctb Tŭkt'ong, Hamhŏ ctb https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Muller, A. Charles Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) HISTORY / Asia / Korea bisacsh Buddhism Korea Early works to 1800 Confucianism Korea Early works to 1800 Religious disputations Korea Early works to 1800 |
title | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) |
title_auth | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) |
title_exact_search | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) |
title_exact_search_txtP | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) |
title_full | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) A. Charles Muller; ed. by Robert E. Buswell |
title_fullStr | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) A. Charles Muller; ed. by Robert E. Buswell |
title_full_unstemmed | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) A. Charles Muller; ed. by Robert E. Buswell |
title_short | Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate |
title_sort | korea s great buddhist confucian debate the treatises of chong tojon sambong and hamho tukt ong kihwa |
title_sub | The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) |
topic | HISTORY / Asia / Korea bisacsh Buddhism Korea Early works to 1800 Confucianism Korea Early works to 1800 Religious disputations Korea Early works to 1800 |
topic_facet | HISTORY / Asia / Korea Buddhism Korea Early works to 1800 Confucianism Korea Early works to 1800 Religious disputations Korea Early works to 1800 |
url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824857271 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulleracharles koreasgreatbuddhistconfuciandebatethetreatisesofchongtojonsambongandhamhotuktongkihwa AT buswellroberte koreasgreatbuddhistconfuciandebatethetreatisesofchongtojonsambongandhamhotuktongkihwa AT tojonchong koreasgreatbuddhistconfuciandebatethetreatisesofchongtojonsambongandhamhotuktongkihwa AT tuktonghamho koreasgreatbuddhistconfuciandebatethetreatisesofchongtojonsambongandhamhotuktongkihwa |