A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law:
"Intellectual property law is based on a specific notion of reality. According to this understanding, there exist immaterial objects which are exclusively assigned to a rights holder.1 Unlike corporeal objects ('things'),2 these immaterial objects cannot be touched, nor can their phys...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge intellectual property and information law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Intellectual property law is based on a specific notion of reality. According to this understanding, there exist immaterial objects which are exclusively assigned to a rights holder.1 Unlike corporeal objects ('things'),2 these immaterial objects cannot be touched, nor can their physical existence be measured as with intangible, yet still physical data or software.3 They are also not identical with specific exemplars of a copyrightable work (e.g. a book or a digital file), with products, mechanical or other technical processes, with product signs on packaging or advertising material, etc. Instead the objects protected by IP law are merely accidentally embodied in these manifestations. The work, the invention, the design, the distinctive sign, etc. exist strictly separated from their instantiations as immaterial ('intellectual'), abstract objects (in the following: abstract IP objects).4 Thus, three types of objects can be distinguished under German private law: the movable or immovable tangible thing (Section 90 of the Civil Code); other intangible yet physically measurable, material objects such as electric energy, a digital file or a computer program embodied on a data carrier (Section 453(1) alt. 2 of the Civil Code); and the immaterial, abstract IP object.5"-- |
| Beschreibung: | xi, 203 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781108498326 1108498329 9781108735728 110873572X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047378638 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210921 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210720s2021 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108498326 |9 978-1-108-49832-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 1108498329 |9 1-108-49832-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108735728 |9 978-1-108-73572-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 110873572X |9 1-108-73572-X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1223072525 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047378638 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Peukert, Alexander |d 1973- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)121255492 |4 aut | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |c Alexander Peukert, Goethe University (Frankfurt). Translated by Gill Mertens |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore |b Cambridge University Press |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a xi, 203 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge intellectual property and information law | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Introduction -- Two ontologies -- Two abstractions -- Interim summary : an implausible paradigm -- The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies -- Normative critique of the abstract IP object | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Intellectual property law is based on a specific notion of reality. According to this understanding, there exist immaterial objects which are exclusively assigned to a rights holder.1 Unlike corporeal objects ('things'),2 these immaterial objects cannot be touched, nor can their physical existence be measured as with intangible, yet still physical data or software.3 They are also not identical with specific exemplars of a copyrightable work (e.g. a book or a digital file), with products, mechanical or other technical processes, with product signs on packaging or advertising material, etc. Instead the objects protected by IP law are merely accidentally embodied in these manifestations. The work, the invention, the design, the distinctive sign, etc. exist strictly separated from their instantiations as immaterial ('intellectual'), abstract objects (in the following: abstract IP objects).4 Thus, three types of objects can be distinguished under German private law: the movable or immovable tangible thing (Section 90 of the Civil Code); other intangible yet physically measurable, material objects such as electric energy, a digital file or a computer program embodied on a data carrier (Section 453(1) alt. 2 of the Civil Code); and the immaterial, abstract IP object.5"-- | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Intellectual property / Germany | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Intellectual property | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Germany | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mertens, Gill |0 (DE-588)114354174X |4 trl | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-108-65332-9 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032780265 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182622359781376 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Peukert, Alexander 1973- |
| author2 | Mertens, Gill |
| author2_role | trl |
| author2_variant | g m gm |
| author_GND | (DE-588)121255492 (DE-588)114354174X |
| author_facet | Peukert, Alexander 1973- Mertens, Gill |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Peukert, Alexander 1973- |
| author_variant | a p ap |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047378638 |
| contents | Introduction -- Two ontologies -- Two abstractions -- Interim summary : an implausible paradigm -- The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies -- Normative critique of the abstract IP object |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1223072525 (DE-599)BVBBV047378638 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02919nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047378638</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210921 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210720s2021 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108498326</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-49832-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1108498329</subfield><subfield code="9">1-108-49832-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108735728</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-73572-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">110873572X</subfield><subfield code="9">1-108-73572-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1223072525</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047378638</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peukert, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="d">1973-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121255492</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law</subfield><subfield code="c">Alexander Peukert, Goethe University (Frankfurt). Translated by Gill Mertens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xi, 203 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge intellectual property and information law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- Two ontologies -- Two abstractions -- Interim summary : an implausible paradigm -- The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies -- Normative critique of the abstract IP object</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Intellectual property law is based on a specific notion of reality. According to this understanding, there exist immaterial objects which are exclusively assigned to a rights holder.1 Unlike corporeal objects ('things'),2 these immaterial objects cannot be touched, nor can their physical existence be measured as with intangible, yet still physical data or software.3 They are also not identical with specific exemplars of a copyrightable work (e.g. a book or a digital file), with products, mechanical or other technical processes, with product signs on packaging or advertising material, etc. Instead the objects protected by IP law are merely accidentally embodied in these manifestations. The work, the invention, the design, the distinctive sign, etc. exist strictly separated from their instantiations as immaterial ('intellectual'), abstract objects (in the following: abstract IP objects).4 Thus, three types of objects can be distinguished under German private law: the movable or immovable tangible thing (Section 90 of the Civil Code); other intangible yet physically measurable, material objects such as electric energy, a digital file or a computer program embodied on a data carrier (Section 453(1) alt. 2 of the Civil Code); and the immaterial, abstract IP object.5"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intellectual property / Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intellectual property</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mertens, Gill</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)114354174X</subfield><subfield code="4">trl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-65332-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032780265</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047378638 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:46:56Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:10:29Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108498326 1108498329 9781108735728 110873572X |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032780265 |
| oclc_num | 1223072525 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 |
| physical | xi, 203 Seiten 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge intellectual property and information law |
| spelling | Peukert, Alexander 1973- Verfasser (DE-588)121255492 aut Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law Alexander Peukert, Goethe University (Frankfurt). Translated by Gill Mertens Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore Cambridge University Press 2021 xi, 203 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Cambridge intellectual property and information law Introduction -- Two ontologies -- Two abstractions -- Interim summary : an implausible paradigm -- The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies -- Normative critique of the abstract IP object "Intellectual property law is based on a specific notion of reality. According to this understanding, there exist immaterial objects which are exclusively assigned to a rights holder.1 Unlike corporeal objects ('things'),2 these immaterial objects cannot be touched, nor can their physical existence be measured as with intangible, yet still physical data or software.3 They are also not identical with specific exemplars of a copyrightable work (e.g. a book or a digital file), with products, mechanical or other technical processes, with product signs on packaging or advertising material, etc. Instead the objects protected by IP law are merely accidentally embodied in these manifestations. The work, the invention, the design, the distinctive sign, etc. exist strictly separated from their instantiations as immaterial ('intellectual'), abstract objects (in the following: abstract IP objects).4 Thus, three types of objects can be distinguished under German private law: the movable or immovable tangible thing (Section 90 of the Civil Code); other intangible yet physically measurable, material objects such as electric energy, a digital file or a computer program embodied on a data carrier (Section 453(1) alt. 2 of the Civil Code); and the immaterial, abstract IP object.5"-- Intellectual property / Germany Intellectual property Germany Mertens, Gill (DE-588)114354174X trl Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-108-65332-9 |
| spellingShingle | Peukert, Alexander 1973- A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law Introduction -- Two ontologies -- Two abstractions -- Interim summary : an implausible paradigm -- The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies -- Normative critique of the abstract IP object |
| title | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |
| title_alt | Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts |
| title_auth | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |
| title_exact_search | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |
| title_exact_search_txtP | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |
| title_full | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law Alexander Peukert, Goethe University (Frankfurt). Translated by Gill Mertens |
| title_fullStr | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law Alexander Peukert, Goethe University (Frankfurt). Translated by Gill Mertens |
| title_full_unstemmed | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law Alexander Peukert, Goethe University (Frankfurt). Translated by Gill Mertens |
| title_short | A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |
| title_sort | a critique of the ontology of intellectual property law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peukertalexander kritikderontologiedesimmaterialguterrechts AT mertensgill kritikderontologiedesimmaterialguterrechts AT peukertalexander acritiqueoftheontologyofintellectualpropertylaw AT mertensgill acritiqueoftheontologyofintellectualpropertylaw |