Linien und Umwege: Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum
The article explores the marginalization of Byzantium within the canon of art history, focusing on the German-speaking tradition. This peripheral role is particularly striking because art history’s attempts to integrate the Roman East into the canon (the "Byzantine question") can be traced...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
| Sprache: | German |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021-07-08
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | The article explores the marginalization of Byzantium within the canon of art history, focusing on the German-speaking tradition. This peripheral role is particularly striking because art history’s attempts to integrate the Roman East into the canon (the "Byzantine question") can be traced back to the beginnings of art history as an academic discipline. From very early on, art historians have been interested in global art histories beyond the confines of the West, a disposition that has increased exponentially in recent decades. By investigating the historiography of Byzantine art history, the ideology of nationalism, and modern concepts of time and history, this article demonstrates that both the canon and the nation-state were born of concepts of the linear, teleological flow of time during the Enlightenment. The article argues that the "Byzantine question", the integration of the Eastern Roman Empire into the canon, had always been doomed to fail. The reason for this is the linear, teleological structure both of modern temporality and of the canon – one that does not allow detours, only branches. Byzantium, with its close connections to the Western traditions, has long troubled this narrative and therefore serves as a lens through which to address questions of decentering and the position of other non-Western cultures in relation to the Western canon |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 2701-1550 |
| DOI: | 10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nma a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047367603 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210827 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210712s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||ger d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1260142388 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047367603 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a ger | |
| 049 | |a DE-Y3 |a DE-255 |a DE-Y7 |a DE-Y2 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bergmeier, Armin F. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1122650442 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Linien und Umwege |b Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum |c Armin F. Bergmeier |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021-07-08 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The article explores the marginalization of Byzantium within the canon of art history, focusing on the German-speaking tradition. This peripheral role is particularly striking because art history’s attempts to integrate the Roman East into the canon (the "Byzantine question") can be traced back to the beginnings of art history as an academic discipline. From very early on, art historians have been interested in global art histories beyond the confines of the West, a disposition that has increased exponentially in recent decades. By investigating the historiography of Byzantine art history, the ideology of nationalism, and modern concepts of time and history, this article demonstrates that both the canon and the nation-state were born of concepts of the linear, teleological flow of time during the Enlightenment. The article argues that the "Byzantine question", the integration of the Eastern Roman Empire into the canon, had always been doomed to fail. The reason for this is the linear, teleological structure both of modern temporality and of the canon – one that does not allow detours, only branches. Byzantium, with its close connections to the Western traditions, has long troubled this narrative and therefore serves as a lens through which to address questions of decentering and the position of other non-Western cultures in relation to the Western canon | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kunstgeschichte |g Fach |0 (DE-588)4138803-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kanon |0 (DE-588)4131583-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kunstgeschichtsschreibung |0 (DE-588)4033643-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Byzanz |0 (DE-588)4088772-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Byzantinisches Reich |0 (DE-588)4009256-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | |a Zeit | ||
| 653 | |a Nationalismus | ||
| 653 | |a Global Studies | ||
| 653 | |a Geschichtsphilosophie | ||
| 653 | |a Kanon | ||
| 653 | |a Museen | ||
| 653 | |a Fachgeschichte | ||
| 688 | 7 | |a Byzantinische Kunst |0 (DE-2581)TH000005766 |2 gbd | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Byzantinisches Reich |0 (DE-588)4009256-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kunstgeschichtsschreibung |0 (DE-588)4033643-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Kunstgeschichte |g Fach |0 (DE-588)4138803-3 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Kanon |0 (DE-588)4131583-2 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Byzanz |0 (DE-588)4088772-8 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 3 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g number:2 |g year:2021 |g pages:73-95 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t 21: inquiries into art, history, and the visual |d Heidelberg, 2021 |g Vol. 2, No. 2 (2021), Seite 73-95 |w (DE-604)BV046617927 |x 2701-1550 |o (DE-600)3010740-4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 940 | 1 | |n gbd | |
| 940 | 1 | |q gbd_4_2108 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032769454 | ||
| 941 | |b 2 |h 2 |j 2021 |s 73-95 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182603642699776 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV046617927 |
| author | Bergmeier, Armin F. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1122650442 |
| author_facet | Bergmeier, Armin F. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bergmeier, Armin F. |
| author_variant | a f b af afb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047367603 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1260142388 (DE-599)BVBBV047367603 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007 |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Electronic Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03616nma a2200613 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047367603</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210827 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210712s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||ger d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1260142388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047367603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Y3</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y7</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bergmeier, Armin F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1122650442</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Linien und Umwege</subfield><subfield code="b">Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum</subfield><subfield code="c">Armin F. Bergmeier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021-07-08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article explores the marginalization of Byzantium within the canon of art history, focusing on the German-speaking tradition. This peripheral role is particularly striking because art history’s attempts to integrate the Roman East into the canon (the "Byzantine question") can be traced back to the beginnings of art history as an academic discipline. From very early on, art historians have been interested in global art histories beyond the confines of the West, a disposition that has increased exponentially in recent decades. By investigating the historiography of Byzantine art history, the ideology of nationalism, and modern concepts of time and history, this article demonstrates that both the canon and the nation-state were born of concepts of the linear, teleological flow of time during the Enlightenment. The article argues that the "Byzantine question", the integration of the Eastern Roman Empire into the canon, had always been doomed to fail. The reason for this is the linear, teleological structure both of modern temporality and of the canon – one that does not allow detours, only branches. Byzantium, with its close connections to the Western traditions, has long troubled this narrative and therefore serves as a lens through which to address questions of decentering and the position of other non-Western cultures in relation to the Western canon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstgeschichte</subfield><subfield code="g">Fach</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138803-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kanon</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131583-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstgeschichtsschreibung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033643-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Byzanz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4088772-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Byzantinisches Reich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009256-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nationalismus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Global Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Geschichtsphilosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kanon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Museen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fachgeschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Byzantinische Kunst</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000005766</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Byzantinisches Reich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009256-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kunstgeschichtsschreibung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033643-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kunstgeschichte</subfield><subfield code="g">Fach</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138803-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kanon</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131583-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Byzanz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4088772-8</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:73-95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">21: inquiries into art, history, and the visual</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Vol. 2, No. 2 (2021), Seite 73-95</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV046617927</subfield><subfield code="x">2701-1550</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)3010740-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_4_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032769454</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2</subfield><subfield code="h">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="s">73-95</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Byzanz (DE-588)4088772-8 gnd Byzantinisches Reich (DE-588)4009256-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Byzanz Byzantinisches Reich |
| id | DE-604.BV047367603 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:43:37Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:10:11Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 2701-1550 |
| language | German |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032769454 |
| oclc_num | 1260142388 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-Y3 DE-255 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
| owner_facet | DE-Y3 DE-255 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
| psigel | gbd_4_2108 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Bergmeier, Armin F. Verfasser (DE-588)1122650442 aut Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum Armin F. Bergmeier 2021-07-08 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The article explores the marginalization of Byzantium within the canon of art history, focusing on the German-speaking tradition. This peripheral role is particularly striking because art history’s attempts to integrate the Roman East into the canon (the "Byzantine question") can be traced back to the beginnings of art history as an academic discipline. From very early on, art historians have been interested in global art histories beyond the confines of the West, a disposition that has increased exponentially in recent decades. By investigating the historiography of Byzantine art history, the ideology of nationalism, and modern concepts of time and history, this article demonstrates that both the canon and the nation-state were born of concepts of the linear, teleological flow of time during the Enlightenment. The article argues that the "Byzantine question", the integration of the Eastern Roman Empire into the canon, had always been doomed to fail. The reason for this is the linear, teleological structure both of modern temporality and of the canon – one that does not allow detours, only branches. Byzantium, with its close connections to the Western traditions, has long troubled this narrative and therefore serves as a lens through which to address questions of decentering and the position of other non-Western cultures in relation to the Western canon Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Kunstgeschichte Fach (DE-588)4138803-3 gnd rswk-swf Kanon (DE-588)4131583-2 gnd rswk-swf Kunstgeschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4033643-8 gnd rswk-swf Byzanz (DE-588)4088772-8 gnd rswk-swf Byzantinisches Reich (DE-588)4009256-2 gnd rswk-swf Zeit Nationalismus Global Studies Geschichtsphilosophie Kanon Museen Fachgeschichte Byzantinische Kunst (DE-2581)TH000005766 gbd Byzantinisches Reich (DE-588)4009256-2 g Kunstgeschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4033643-8 s Geschichte z DE-604 Kunstgeschichte Fach (DE-588)4138803-3 s Kanon (DE-588)4131583-2 s Byzanz (DE-588)4088772-8 g volume:2 number:2 year:2021 pages:73-95 21: inquiries into art, history, and the visual Heidelberg, 2021 Vol. 2, No. 2 (2021), Seite 73-95 (DE-604)BV046617927 2701-1550 (DE-600)3010740-4 https://doi.org/10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Bergmeier, Armin F. Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum Kunstgeschichte Fach (DE-588)4138803-3 gnd Kanon (DE-588)4131583-2 gnd Kunstgeschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4033643-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4138803-3 (DE-588)4131583-2 (DE-588)4033643-8 (DE-588)4088772-8 (DE-588)4009256-2 |
| title | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum |
| title_auth | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum |
| title_exact_search | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum |
| title_full | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum Armin F. Bergmeier |
| title_fullStr | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum Armin F. Bergmeier |
| title_full_unstemmed | Linien und Umwege Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum Armin F. Bergmeier |
| title_short | Linien und Umwege |
| title_sort | linien und umwege byzanz nation und der kanon der kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen raum |
| title_sub | Byzanz, Nation und der Kanon der Kunstgeschichte im deutschsprachigen Raum |
| topic | Kunstgeschichte Fach (DE-588)4138803-3 gnd Kanon (DE-588)4131583-2 gnd Kunstgeschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4033643-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kunstgeschichte Fach Kanon Kunstgeschichtsschreibung Byzanz Byzantinisches Reich |
| url | https://doi.org/10.11588/xxi.2021.2.82007 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bergmeierarminf linienundumwegebyzanznationundderkanonderkunstgeschichteimdeutschsprachigenraum |