Time to revisit classical film theory:
Film audiences are no longer in a position to know for certain which images, or features of images they see on the screen were created by photography and which were created in a computer. Yet they are reacting to the advent of computer graphics as if it is merely a technical improvement, not a chang...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Film audiences are no longer in a position to know for certain which images, or features of images they see on the screen were created by photography and which were created in a computer. Yet they are reacting to the advent of computer graphics as if it is merely a technical improvement, not a change in the nature of film itself. This would mean that one of the most influential early theories of film - realism - is wrong. It held that film is by nature photographic and that its unique value is to afford the audience the physical connection with reality that photography, uniquely among pictorial media, brings. I argue that the audience is right about this. Even as applied to purely photographic films, realism was simply a mistake. |
| ISSN: | 0021-8529 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047323827 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210617 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210614s2021 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1257817141 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047323827 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hunt, Lester H. |d 1946- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1113030992 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Time to revisit classical film theory |c Lester H. Hunt |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Film audiences are no longer in a position to know for certain which images, or features of images they see on the screen were created by photography and which were created in a computer. Yet they are reacting to the advent of computer graphics as if it is merely a technical improvement, not a change in the nature of film itself. This would mean that one of the most influential early theories of film - realism - is wrong. It held that film is by nature photographic and that its unique value is to afford the audience the physical connection with reality that photography, uniquely among pictorial media, brings. I argue that the audience is right about this. Even as applied to purely photographic films, realism was simply a mistake. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Film |0 (DE-588)4017102-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Filmtheorie |0 (DE-588)4071216-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wirklichkeit |0 (DE-588)4066380-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Computeranimation |0 (DE-588)4199710-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Film |0 (DE-588)4017102-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Filmtheorie |0 (DE-588)4071216-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Computeranimation |0 (DE-588)4199710-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Wirklichkeit |0 (DE-588)4066380-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:79 |g number:1 |g year:2021 |g pages:42-51 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro |d Hoboken, NJ, 2021 |g Volume 79, number 1 (winter 2021), Seite 42-51 |w (DE-604)BV002662422 |x 0021-8529 |o (DE-600)2930-0 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032726508 | ||
| 941 | |b 79 |h 1 |j 2021 |s 42-51 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182523405664256 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV002662422 |
| author | Hunt, Lester H. 1946- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1113030992 |
| author_facet | Hunt, Lester H. 1946- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Hunt, Lester H. 1946- |
| author_variant | l h h lh lhh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047323827 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1257817141 (DE-599)BVBBV047323827 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02177naa a2200385 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047323827</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210617 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210614s2021 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1257817141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047323827</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hunt, Lester H.</subfield><subfield code="d">1946-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1113030992</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Time to revisit classical film theory</subfield><subfield code="c">Lester H. Hunt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Film audiences are no longer in a position to know for certain which images, or features of images they see on the screen were created by photography and which were created in a computer. Yet they are reacting to the advent of computer graphics as if it is merely a technical improvement, not a change in the nature of film itself. This would mean that one of the most influential early theories of film - realism - is wrong. It held that film is by nature photographic and that its unique value is to afford the audience the physical connection with reality that photography, uniquely among pictorial media, brings. I argue that the audience is right about this. Even as applied to purely photographic films, realism was simply a mistake.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Film</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017102-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Filmtheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071216-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wirklichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066380-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computeranimation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4199710-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Film</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017102-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Filmtheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071216-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Computeranimation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4199710-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Wirklichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066380-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:79</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:42-51</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 79, number 1 (winter 2021), Seite 42-51</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002662422</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8529</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2930-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032726508</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">79</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="s">42-51</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047323827 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:30:16Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:08:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 0021-8529 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032726508 |
| oclc_num | 1257817141 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Hunt, Lester H. 1946- Verfasser (DE-588)1113030992 aut Time to revisit classical film theory Lester H. Hunt 2021 txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Film audiences are no longer in a position to know for certain which images, or features of images they see on the screen were created by photography and which were created in a computer. Yet they are reacting to the advent of computer graphics as if it is merely a technical improvement, not a change in the nature of film itself. This would mean that one of the most influential early theories of film - realism - is wrong. It held that film is by nature photographic and that its unique value is to afford the audience the physical connection with reality that photography, uniquely among pictorial media, brings. I argue that the audience is right about this. Even as applied to purely photographic films, realism was simply a mistake. Film (DE-588)4017102-4 gnd rswk-swf Filmtheorie (DE-588)4071216-3 gnd rswk-swf Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 gnd rswk-swf Computeranimation (DE-588)4199710-4 gnd rswk-swf Film (DE-588)4017102-4 s Filmtheorie (DE-588)4071216-3 s Computeranimation (DE-588)4199710-4 s Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 s DE-604 volume:79 number:1 year:2021 pages:42-51 The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro Hoboken, NJ, 2021 Volume 79, number 1 (winter 2021), Seite 42-51 (DE-604)BV002662422 0021-8529 (DE-600)2930-0 |
| spellingShingle | Hunt, Lester H. 1946- Time to revisit classical film theory Film (DE-588)4017102-4 gnd Filmtheorie (DE-588)4071216-3 gnd Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 gnd Computeranimation (DE-588)4199710-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4017102-4 (DE-588)4071216-3 (DE-588)4066380-2 (DE-588)4199710-4 |
| title | Time to revisit classical film theory |
| title_auth | Time to revisit classical film theory |
| title_exact_search | Time to revisit classical film theory |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Time to revisit classical film theory |
| title_full | Time to revisit classical film theory Lester H. Hunt |
| title_fullStr | Time to revisit classical film theory Lester H. Hunt |
| title_full_unstemmed | Time to revisit classical film theory Lester H. Hunt |
| title_short | Time to revisit classical film theory |
| title_sort | time to revisit classical film theory |
| topic | Film (DE-588)4017102-4 gnd Filmtheorie (DE-588)4071216-3 gnd Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 gnd Computeranimation (DE-588)4199710-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Film Filmtheorie Wirklichkeit Computeranimation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT huntlesterh timetorevisitclassicalfilmtheory |