Let's be reasonable: a conservative case for liberal education
A conservative college professor's compelling defense of liberal educationNot so long ago, conservative intellectuals such as William F. Buckley Jr. believed universities were worth fighting for. Today, conservatives seem more inclined to burn them down. In Let's Be Reasonable, conservativ...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton ; Oxford
Princeton University Press
[2021]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-739 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | A conservative college professor's compelling defense of liberal educationNot so long ago, conservative intellectuals such as William F. Buckley Jr. believed universities were worth fighting for. Today, conservatives seem more inclined to burn them down. In Let's Be Reasonable, conservative political theorist and professor Jonathan Marks finds in liberal education an antidote to this despair, arguing that the true purpose of college is to shape people who are reasonable-and revealing why the health of our democracy is at stake.Drawing on the ideas of John Locke and other leading thinkers, Marks presents the case for why, now more than ever, conservatives must not give up on higher education. He recognizes that professors and administrators frequently adopt the language and priorities of the left, but he explains why conservative nightmare visions of liberal persecution and indoctrination bear little resemblance to what actually goes on in college classrooms. Marks examines why advocates for liberal education struggle to offer a coherent defense of themselves against their conservative critics, and demonstrates why such a defense must rest on the cultivation of reason and of pride in being reasonable.More than just a campus battlefield guide, Let's Be Reasonable recovers what is truly liberal about liberal education-the ability to reason for oneself and with others-and shows why the liberally educated person considers reason to be more than just a tool for scoring political points |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xviii, 221 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9780691207711 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9780691207711 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047309401 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20220909 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210604s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780691207711 |c Online, PDF |9 978-0-691-20771-1 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780691207711 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691207711 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-23-SEW)9780691207711 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1256422304 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047309401 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-1043 |a DE-1046 |a DE-858 |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-11 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 378.73 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Marks, Jonathan M. |d 1955- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)143482726 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Let's be reasonable |b a conservative case for liberal education |c Jonathan Marks |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton ; Oxford |b Princeton University Press |c [2021] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xviii, 221 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A conservative college professor's compelling defense of liberal educationNot so long ago, conservative intellectuals such as William F. Buckley Jr. believed universities were worth fighting for. Today, conservatives seem more inclined to burn them down. In Let's Be Reasonable, conservative political theorist and professor Jonathan Marks finds in liberal education an antidote to this despair, arguing that the true purpose of college is to shape people who are reasonable-and revealing why the health of our democracy is at stake.Drawing on the ideas of John Locke and other leading thinkers, Marks presents the case for why, now more than ever, conservatives must not give up on higher education. He recognizes that professors and administrators frequently adopt the language and priorities of the left, but he explains why conservative nightmare visions of liberal persecution and indoctrination bear little resemblance to what actually goes on in college classrooms. Marks examines why advocates for liberal education struggle to offer a coherent defense of themselves against their conservative critics, and demonstrates why such a defense must rest on the cultivation of reason and of pride in being reasonable.More than just a campus battlefield guide, Let's Be Reasonable recovers what is truly liberal about liberal education-the ability to reason for oneself and with others-and shows why the liberally educated person considers reason to be more than just a tool for scoring political points | ||
650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION / Higher |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a Education, Higher |x Aims and objectives |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Education, Higher |z United States |x Philosophy | |
650 | 4 | |a Education, Humanistic |z United States | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-0-691-19385-4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG |a ZDB-23-SEW | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-23-SEW21 | |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032712384 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-12 |p ZDB-23-SEW |q BSB_SEW_PrincetonUniversityPress |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-1043 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-858 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-Aug4 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-859 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-860 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-473 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-739 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1809402944595951616 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Marks, Jonathan M. 1955- |
author_GND | (DE-588)143482726 |
author_facet | Marks, Jonathan M. 1955- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Marks, Jonathan M. 1955- |
author_variant | j m m jm jmm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047309401 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-SEW |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691207711 (ZDB-23-SEW)9780691207711 (OCoLC)1256422304 (DE-599)BVBBV047309401 |
dewey-full | 378.73 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 378 - Higher education (Tertiary education) |
dewey-raw | 378.73 |
dewey-search | 378.73 |
dewey-sort | 3378.73 |
dewey-tens | 370 - Education |
discipline | Pädagogik |
discipline_str_mv | Pädagogik |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9780691207711 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047309401</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220909</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210604s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691207711</subfield><subfield code="c">Online, PDF</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-691-20771-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9780691207711</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780691207711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-SEW)9780691207711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1256422304</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047309401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">378.73</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marks, Jonathan M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1955-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)143482726</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Let's be reasonable</subfield><subfield code="b">a conservative case for liberal education</subfield><subfield code="c">Jonathan Marks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton ; Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xviii, 221 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A conservative college professor's compelling defense of liberal educationNot so long ago, conservative intellectuals such as William F. Buckley Jr. believed universities were worth fighting for. Today, conservatives seem more inclined to burn them down. In Let's Be Reasonable, conservative political theorist and professor Jonathan Marks finds in liberal education an antidote to this despair, arguing that the true purpose of college is to shape people who are reasonable-and revealing why the health of our democracy is at stake.Drawing on the ideas of John Locke and other leading thinkers, Marks presents the case for why, now more than ever, conservatives must not give up on higher education. He recognizes that professors and administrators frequently adopt the language and priorities of the left, but he explains why conservative nightmare visions of liberal persecution and indoctrination bear little resemblance to what actually goes on in college classrooms. Marks examines why advocates for liberal education struggle to offer a coherent defense of themselves against their conservative critics, and demonstrates why such a defense must rest on the cultivation of reason and of pride in being reasonable.More than just a campus battlefield guide, Let's Be Reasonable recovers what is truly liberal about liberal education-the ability to reason for oneself and with others-and shows why the liberally educated person considers reason to be more than just a tool for scoring political points</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION / Higher</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education, Higher</subfield><subfield code="x">Aims and objectives</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education, Higher</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education, Humanistic</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-691-19385-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-SEW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-23-SEW21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032712384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-SEW</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_SEW_PrincetonUniversityPress</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047309401 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T17:25:43Z |
indexdate | 2024-09-06T00:05:16Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780691207711 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032712384 |
oclc_num | 1256422304 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 DE-12 DE-11 |
owner_facet | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 DE-12 DE-11 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xviii, 221 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-SEW ZDB-23-SEW21 ZDB-23-SEW BSB_SEW_PrincetonUniversityPress ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | Princeton University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Marks, Jonathan M. 1955- Verfasser (DE-588)143482726 aut Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education Jonathan Marks Princeton ; Oxford Princeton University Press [2021] © 2021 1 Online-Ressource (xviii, 221 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier A conservative college professor's compelling defense of liberal educationNot so long ago, conservative intellectuals such as William F. Buckley Jr. believed universities were worth fighting for. Today, conservatives seem more inclined to burn them down. In Let's Be Reasonable, conservative political theorist and professor Jonathan Marks finds in liberal education an antidote to this despair, arguing that the true purpose of college is to shape people who are reasonable-and revealing why the health of our democracy is at stake.Drawing on the ideas of John Locke and other leading thinkers, Marks presents the case for why, now more than ever, conservatives must not give up on higher education. He recognizes that professors and administrators frequently adopt the language and priorities of the left, but he explains why conservative nightmare visions of liberal persecution and indoctrination bear little resemblance to what actually goes on in college classrooms. Marks examines why advocates for liberal education struggle to offer a coherent defense of themselves against their conservative critics, and demonstrates why such a defense must rest on the cultivation of reason and of pride in being reasonable.More than just a campus battlefield guide, Let's Be Reasonable recovers what is truly liberal about liberal education-the ability to reason for oneself and with others-and shows why the liberally educated person considers reason to be more than just a tool for scoring political points EDUCATION / Higher bisacsh Education, Higher Aims and objectives United States Education, Higher United States Philosophy Education, Humanistic United States Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-0-691-19385-4 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Marks, Jonathan M. 1955- Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education EDUCATION / Higher bisacsh Education, Higher Aims and objectives United States Education, Higher United States Philosophy Education, Humanistic United States |
title | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education |
title_auth | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education |
title_exact_search | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education |
title_exact_search_txtP | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education |
title_full | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education Jonathan Marks |
title_fullStr | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education Jonathan Marks |
title_full_unstemmed | Let's be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education Jonathan Marks |
title_short | Let's be reasonable |
title_sort | let s be reasonable a conservative case for liberal education |
title_sub | a conservative case for liberal education |
topic | EDUCATION / Higher bisacsh Education, Higher Aims and objectives United States Education, Higher United States Philosophy Education, Humanistic United States |
topic_facet | EDUCATION / Higher Education, Higher Aims and objectives United States Education, Higher United States Philosophy Education, Humanistic United States |
url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207711 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marksjonathanm letsbereasonableaconservativecaseforliberaleducation |