Epistemic defeat: a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin ; Boston
De Gruyter
[2021]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Epistemic studies
volume 47 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://www.degruyter.com/books/9783110735352 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | X, 286 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9783110735352 3110735350 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047293148 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20221017 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210521s2021 gw m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 015 | |a 20,N46 |2 dnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 1220991589 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9783110735352 |9 978-3-11-073535-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 3110735350 |9 3-11-073535-0 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9783110735352 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1257810024 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB1220991589 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a gw |c XA-DE-BE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-11 |a DE-355 |a DE-29 |a DE-20 |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a CC 4400 |0 (DE-625)17626: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |8 1\p |a 100 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Constantin, Jan |d 1989- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1236377966 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epistemic defeat |b a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |c Jan Constantin |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin ; Boston |b De Gruyter |c [2021] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
| 300 | |a X, 286 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Epistemic studies |v volume 47 | |
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Universität Köln |d 2019 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Epistemologische Überzeugung |0 (DE-588)1113033665 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Fallibilismus |0 (DE-588)4250187-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtfertigung |g Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4138650-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Inkongruenz |0 (DE-588)106428129X |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | |a disagreement | ||
| 653 | |a epistemic justification | ||
| 653 | |a Epistemic defeat | ||
| 653 | |a epistemische Niederlage | ||
| 653 | |a epistemische Rechtfertigung | ||
| 653 | |a Uneinigkeit | ||
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemologische Überzeugung |0 (DE-588)1113033665 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtfertigung |g Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4138650-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Inkongruenz |0 (DE-588)106428129X |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Fallibilismus |0 (DE-588)4250187-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG |0 (DE-588)10095502-2 |4 pbl | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, PDF |z 978-3-11-073054-8 |w (DE-604)BV047393101 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB |z 978-3-11-073068-5 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Epistemic studies |v volume 47 |w (DE-604)BV044407301 |9 47 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m X:MVB |u https://www.degruyter.com/books/9783110735352 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m DNB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032696457&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032696457 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a vlb |d 20201107 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182467745153024 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
-
1
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
DEFEATERS,
FUNCTIONAL
PROFILES
AND
DEEP
DISTINCTIONS
-
7
TERMINOLOGY
-
7
DEEP
AND
SUPERFICIAL
DISTINCTIONS
-
14
A
PRELIMINARY
THEORY
AND
TAXONOMY
OF
DEFEAT
-
22
2
2.1
2.1.1
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
28
REBUTTING
DEFEATERS
-
28
PARTIAL,
SUCCESSFUL
AND,
PERFECT
REBUTTAL
AND
RELATIVE
CONCENTRATIONS
OF
INPUT
----
31
2.1.2
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
DEGREES
OF
REBUTTAL
AND
AN
ACCOUNT
OF
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
40
THE
EPISTEMIC
STATUS
OF
DEFEATERS
-
42
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
AND
THE
DEFEATER-JUSTIFIER-SYMMETRY
-
43
THE
INCLUSIVE
THESIS:
DEFEATERS
NEED
NOT
HAVE
POSITIVE
EPISTEMIC
STATUS
-
49
2.2.3
THE
EXCLUSIVE
THESIS:
DEFEATERS
DO
NEED
TO
HAVE
POSITIVE
EPISTEMIC
STATUS
-
54
3
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
60
THE
NAIVE
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
-
62
POLLOCK
S
VIEW
-----62
THE
MILK-TASTER
CASE
AND
THE
NATVE
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
-
65
WORRIES
ABOUT
THE
NAIVE
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
71
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
THE
SUSPENSION
ACCOUNT
-
76
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
AND
SUSPENSION
OF
JUDGMENT
-
77
FIRST
OBJECTION:
THE
SOURCE-SENSITIVITY
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
-
84
3.2.3
SECOND
OBJECTION:
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
AND
HIGHER-ORDER
SUPPORT
-
85
3.2.4
THIRD
OBJECTION:
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
AND
THE
WEIGHING
OF
SUPPORT
----
87
3.2.5
A
SUMMARY
OF
THE
ARGUMENTS
AND
AN
EXTENSION
TO
THE
ACCOUNT
OF
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
89
VIII
-
CONTENTS
3.3
THE
COMMITMENT-BASED
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
-
92
3.3.1
ACTUAL
AND
APPARENT
COMMITMENTS:
A
FIRST
STAB
AT
THE
CONCEPT
----
93
3.3.2
THE
NATURE
OF
EPISTEMIC
COMMITMENTS:
GETTING
THE
ACCOUNT
OFF
THE
GROUND
-
96
3.3.3
ARGUMENTS
AGAINST
COMMITMENT-BASED
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNTS
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
101
3.3.4
THE
DEMANDINGNESS-TRILEMMA
AS
THE
CENTRAL
PROBLEM
FACING
ACCOUNTS
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
105
3.4
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
-
106
3.4.1
THE
RE-EVALUATION
OF
DOXASTIC
ATTITUDES
AND
THE
CONCEPT
OF
REBASING
-
108
3.4.2
THE
RE-EVALUATION
OF
DOXASTIC
ATTITUDES
AND
HIGHER-ORDER
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
115
3.4.3
FORMULATING
THE
UNPACKED
VERSION
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
122
3.4.4
SIMPLIFYING
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
128
3.4.5
ACCOUNTING
FOR
THE
KEY
FEATURES
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
131
3.5
SOME
OBJECTIONS
-
136
3.5.1
FIRST
OBJECTION:
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
CAN
T
DEAL
WITH
COUNTEREXAMPLES
ANY
BETTER
THAN
ITS
RIVALS
-
136
3.5.2
SECOND
OBJECTION:
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
DOES
NOT
ALLOW
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
FOR
UNREFLECTIVE
SUBJECTS
-
139
3.5.3
THIRD
OBJECTION:
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
DOES
NOT
ALLOW
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
FOR
COGNITIVELY
UNSOPHISTICATED
SUBJECTS
----
143
4
PUTTING
THINGS
TOGETHER
-
147
4.1
THE
EXTENDED
ACCOUNT
OF
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
147
4.2
A
DEFENSE
OF
CAUSAL
ACCOUNTS
OF
DEFEAT
-
152
4.2.1
ATTEMPTING
TO
ACCOUNT
FOR
DOUBLE-AGENT
CASES,
WHILE
PRESERVING
THEORETICAL
UNITY
-
153
4.2.2
AGAINST
THE
REASONS-AGAINST-BELIEF
THEORY
OF
DEFEAT
-
160
4.3
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
IN
ITS
FINAL
FORM
-----
165
5
DEFEAT
AND
EPISTEMIC
JUSTIFICATION
-
169
5.1
DEFEAT
AND
EPISTEMIC
NORMS
-
172
5.1.1
TYPE-1
OBLIGATIONS:
OBLIGATIONS
TO
RE-EVALUATE
-
174
CONTENTS
-
IX
5.1.2
TYPE-2
OBLIGATIONS:
OBLIGATIONS
TO
RE-EVALUATE
IN
A
CERTAIN
WAY
-
176
5.2
DEFEAT
AND
INTERNALISM
-
182
5.2.1
INTRODUCING
A
SIMPLE
INTERNALIST
PICTURE
-
183
5.2.2
AN
INTERNALIST
ACCOMMODATION
OF
EPISTEMIC
DEFEAT
-
187
5.2.3
A
PROBLEM
FOR
MODERATELY
INTERNALIST
VERSIONS
OF
EVIDENTIALISM
----
193
5.3
DEFEAT
AND
EXTERNALISM
-
196
5.3.1
SIMPLE
RELIABILISM
-
196
5.3.2
RELIABILISM
S
TROUBLE
WITH
DEFEAT
--
198
5.3.3
RELIABILISM
AND
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
203
5.3.4
TESTING
THE
RELIABILIST
ACCOMMODATION
OF
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT:
REBASING
AND
CHAINING
-
206
5.3.5
TESTING
THE
RELIABILIST
ACCOMMODATION
OF
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT:
ACTIVE
AND
PASSIVE
IGNORANCE
-
210
5.4
NORMATIVE
DEFEATERS
-
214
5.4.1
ASSESSING
THE
CASE
FOR
THE
POSSIBILITY
OF
NORMATIVE
DEFEAT
-
215
5.4.2
REMAINING
MOTIVATIONS
TO
ACCEPT
THE
POSSIBILITY
OF
NORMATIVE
DEFEAT:
THE
EXAMPLE
OF
GOLDBERG
S
VIEW
-
226
5.4.3
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
AND
NORMATIVE
DEFEAT:
PASSIVELY
IGNORED
DEFEATERS
AS
NORMATIVE
DEFEATERS?
-
228
6
DEFEAT
AND
DISAGREEMENT
-
233
6.1
DISAGREEMENT
----
235
6.1.1
EXAMPLES
AND
BASIC
TERMINOLOGY
-
235
6.1.2
DISAGREEMENT
AS
A
DEFEATER:
STRONG
AND
WEAK
VERSIONS
OF
CONCILIATIONISM
----
238
6.2
A
THEORY-DRIVEN
ARGUMENT
FOR
STRONG
CONCILIATIONISM
-
242
6.2.1
SOURCE-NEUTRAL
AND
SOURCE-SENSITIVE
SUPPORT
AND
DEFEAT
-
243
6.2.2
THE
ARGUMENT
FOR
STRONG
CONCILIATIONISM
-
247
6.3
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEAT
-
258
6.3.1
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEATERS
AND
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
-
258
6.3.2
COMPLEX
AND
SIMPLE
CASES
OF
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEAT
-
262
6.3.3
PERSISTENT,
FLEETING
AND
INFECTIOUS
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEATERS
-
266
6.3.4
PEER-DISAGREEMENT
AND
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEAT
-
268
CONCLUSION
-
271
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
274
X
-
CONTENTS
INDEX
-
DEFINITIONS
AND
EXAMPLES
-
284
INDEX
-
NAMES
-
287
|
| adam_txt |
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
-
1
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
DEFEATERS,
FUNCTIONAL
PROFILES
AND
DEEP
DISTINCTIONS
-
7
TERMINOLOGY
-
7
DEEP
AND
SUPERFICIAL
DISTINCTIONS
-
14
A
PRELIMINARY
THEORY
AND
TAXONOMY
OF
DEFEAT
-
22
2
2.1
2.1.1
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
28
REBUTTING
DEFEATERS
-
28
PARTIAL,
SUCCESSFUL
AND,
PERFECT
REBUTTAL
AND
RELATIVE
CONCENTRATIONS
OF
INPUT
----
31
2.1.2
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
DEGREES
OF
REBUTTAL
AND
AN
ACCOUNT
OF
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
40
THE
EPISTEMIC
STATUS
OF
DEFEATERS
-
42
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
AND
THE
DEFEATER-JUSTIFIER-SYMMETRY
-
43
THE
INCLUSIVE
THESIS:
DEFEATERS
NEED
NOT
HAVE
POSITIVE
EPISTEMIC
STATUS
-
49
2.2.3
THE
EXCLUSIVE
THESIS:
DEFEATERS
DO
NEED
TO
HAVE
POSITIVE
EPISTEMIC
STATUS
-
54
3
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
60
THE
NAIVE
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
-
62
POLLOCK
'
S
VIEW
-----62
THE
MILK-TASTER
CASE
AND
THE
NATVE
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
-
65
WORRIES
ABOUT
THE
NAIVE
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
71
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
THE
SUSPENSION
ACCOUNT
-
76
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
AND
SUSPENSION
OF
JUDGMENT
-
77
FIRST
OBJECTION:
THE
SOURCE-SENSITIVITY
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
-
84
3.2.3
SECOND
OBJECTION:
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
AND
HIGHER-ORDER
SUPPORT
-
85
3.2.4
THIRD
OBJECTION:
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
AND
THE
WEIGHING
OF
SUPPORT
----
87
3.2.5
A
SUMMARY
OF
THE
ARGUMENTS
AND
AN
EXTENSION
TO
THE
ACCOUNT
OF
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
89
VIII
-
CONTENTS
3.3
THE
COMMITMENT-BASED
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNT
-
92
3.3.1
ACTUAL
AND
APPARENT
COMMITMENTS:
A
FIRST
STAB
AT
THE
CONCEPT
----
93
3.3.2
THE
NATURE
OF
EPISTEMIC
COMMITMENTS:
GETTING
THE
ACCOUNT
OFF
THE
GROUND
-
96
3.3.3
ARGUMENTS
AGAINST
COMMITMENT-BASED
HIGHER-ORDER
ACCOUNTS
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
101
3.3.4
THE
DEMANDINGNESS-TRILEMMA
AS
THE
CENTRAL
PROBLEM
FACING
ACCOUNTS
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
105
3.4
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
-
106
3.4.1
THE
RE-EVALUATION
OF
DOXASTIC
ATTITUDES
AND
THE
CONCEPT
OF
REBASING
-
108
3.4.2
THE
RE-EVALUATION
OF
DOXASTIC
ATTITUDES
AND
HIGHER-ORDER
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
115
3.4.3
FORMULATING
THE
UNPACKED
VERSION
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
122
3.4.4
SIMPLIFYING
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
128
3.4.5
ACCOUNTING
FOR
THE
KEY
FEATURES
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
131
3.5
SOME
OBJECTIONS
-
136
3.5.1
FIRST
OBJECTION:
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
CAN
'
T
DEAL
WITH
COUNTEREXAMPLES
ANY
BETTER
THAN
ITS
RIVALS
-
136
3.5.2
SECOND
OBJECTION:
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
DOES
NOT
ALLOW
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
FOR
UNREFLECTIVE
SUBJECTS
-
139
3.5.3
THIRD
OBJECTION:
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
DOES
NOT
ALLOW
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
FOR
COGNITIVELY
UNSOPHISTICATED
SUBJECTS
----
143
4
PUTTING
THINGS
TOGETHER
-
147
4.1
THE
EXTENDED
ACCOUNT
OF
REBUTTING
DEFEAT
-
147
4.2
A
DEFENSE
OF
CAUSAL
ACCOUNTS
OF
DEFEAT
-
152
4.2.1
ATTEMPTING
TO
ACCOUNT
FOR
DOUBLE-AGENT
CASES,
WHILE
PRESERVING
THEORETICAL
UNITY
-
153
4.2.2
AGAINST
THE
REASONS-AGAINST-BELIEF
THEORY
OF
DEFEAT
-
160
4.3
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
IN
ITS
FINAL
FORM
-----
165
5
DEFEAT
AND
EPISTEMIC
JUSTIFICATION
-
169
5.1
DEFEAT
AND
EPISTEMIC
NORMS
-
172
5.1.1
TYPE-1
OBLIGATIONS:
OBLIGATIONS
TO
RE-EVALUATE
-
174
CONTENTS
-
IX
5.1.2
TYPE-2
OBLIGATIONS:
OBLIGATIONS
TO
RE-EVALUATE
IN
A
CERTAIN
WAY
-
176
5.2
DEFEAT
AND
INTERNALISM
-
182
5.2.1
INTRODUCING
A
SIMPLE
INTERNALIST
PICTURE
-
183
5.2.2
AN
INTERNALIST
ACCOMMODATION
OF
EPISTEMIC
DEFEAT
-
187
5.2.3
A
PROBLEM
FOR
MODERATELY
INTERNALIST
VERSIONS
OF
EVIDENTIALISM
----
193
5.3
DEFEAT
AND
EXTERNALISM
-
196
5.3.1
SIMPLE
RELIABILISM
-
196
5.3.2
RELIABILISM
'
S
TROUBLE
WITH
DEFEAT
--
198
5.3.3
RELIABILISM
AND
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEAT
-
203
5.3.4
TESTING
THE
RELIABILIST
ACCOMMODATION
OF
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT:
REBASING
AND
CHAINING
-
206
5.3.5
TESTING
THE
RELIABILIST
ACCOMMODATION
OF
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT:
ACTIVE
AND
PASSIVE
IGNORANCE
-
210
5.4
NORMATIVE
DEFEATERS
-
214
5.4.1
ASSESSING
THE
CASE
FOR
THE
POSSIBILITY
OF
NORMATIVE
DEFEAT
-
215
5.4.2
REMAINING
MOTIVATIONS
TO
ACCEPT
THE
POSSIBILITY
OF
NORMATIVE
DEFEAT:
THE
EXAMPLE
OF
GOLDBERG
'
S
VIEW
-
226
5.4.3
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
AND
NORMATIVE
DEFEAT:
PASSIVELY
IGNORED
DEFEATERS
AS
NORMATIVE
DEFEATERS?
-
228
6
DEFEAT
AND
DISAGREEMENT
-
233
6.1
DISAGREEMENT
----
235
6.1.1
EXAMPLES
AND
BASIC
TERMINOLOGY
-
235
6.1.2
DISAGREEMENT
AS
A
DEFEATER:
STRONG
AND
WEAK
VERSIONS
OF
CONCILIATIONISM
----
238
6.2
A
THEORY-DRIVEN
ARGUMENT
FOR
STRONG
CONCILIATIONISM
-
242
6.2.1
SOURCE-NEUTRAL
AND
SOURCE-SENSITIVE
SUPPORT
AND
DEFEAT
-
243
6.2.2
THE
ARGUMENT
FOR
STRONG
CONCILIATIONISM
-
247
6.3
THE
REBASING
ACCOUNT
OF
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEAT
-
258
6.3.1
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEATERS
AND
UNDERCUTTING
DEFEATERS
-
258
6.3.2
COMPLEX
AND
SIMPLE
CASES
OF
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEAT
-
262
6.3.3
PERSISTENT,
FLEETING
AND
INFECTIOUS
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEATERS
-
266
6.3.4
PEER-DISAGREEMENT
AND
HIGHER-ORDER
DEFEAT
-
268
CONCLUSION
-
271
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
274
X
-
CONTENTS
INDEX
-
DEFINITIONS
AND
EXAMPLES
-
284
INDEX
-
NAMES
-
287 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Constantin, Jan 1989- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1236377966 |
| author_facet | Constantin, Jan 1989- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Constantin, Jan 1989- |
| author_variant | j c jc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047293148 |
| classification_rvk | CC 4400 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1257810024 (DE-599)DNB1220991589 |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| discipline_str_mv | Philosophie |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02817nam a2200673zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047293148</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20221017 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210521s2021 gw m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">20,N46</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1220991589</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110735352</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-073535-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110735350</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-073535-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110735352</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1257810024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1220991589</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-BE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 4400</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17626:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="2">sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constantin, Jan</subfield><subfield code="d">1989-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1236377966</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Epistemic defeat</subfield><subfield code="b">a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon</subfield><subfield code="c">Jan Constantin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin ; Boston</subfield><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 286 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Epistemic studies</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 47</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Universität Köln</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Epistemologische Überzeugung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1113033665</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fallibilismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4250187-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtfertigung</subfield><subfield code="g">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138650-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inkongruenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)106428129X</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">disagreement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">epistemic justification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Epistemic defeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">epistemische Niederlage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">epistemische Rechtfertigung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uneinigkeit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Epistemologische Überzeugung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1113033665</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtfertigung</subfield><subfield code="g">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138650-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Inkongruenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)106428129X</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fallibilismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4250187-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)10095502-2</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-073054-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV047393101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-073068-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Epistemic studies</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 47</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV044407301</subfield><subfield code="9">47</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">X:MVB</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/books/9783110735352</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032696457&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032696457</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">vlb</subfield><subfield code="d">20201107</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV047293148 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:20:55Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:08:01Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)10095502-2 |
| isbn | 9783110735352 3110735350 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032696457 |
| oclc_num | 1257810024 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-11 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-29 DE-20 DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-11 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-29 DE-20 DE-12 |
| physical | X, 286 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Epistemic studies |
| series2 | Epistemic studies |
| spelling | Constantin, Jan 1989- Verfasser (DE-588)1236377966 aut Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon Jan Constantin Berlin ; Boston De Gruyter [2021] © 2021 X, 286 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Epistemic studies volume 47 Dissertation Universität Köln 2019 Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd rswk-swf Epistemologische Überzeugung (DE-588)1113033665 gnd rswk-swf Fallibilismus (DE-588)4250187-8 gnd rswk-swf Rechtfertigung Philosophie (DE-588)4138650-4 gnd rswk-swf Inkongruenz (DE-588)106428129X gnd rswk-swf disagreement epistemic justification Epistemic defeat epistemische Niederlage epistemische Rechtfertigung Uneinigkeit (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Epistemologische Überzeugung (DE-588)1113033665 s Rechtfertigung Philosophie (DE-588)4138650-4 s Inkongruenz (DE-588)106428129X s Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 s Fallibilismus (DE-588)4250187-8 s DE-604 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG (DE-588)10095502-2 pbl Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 978-3-11-073054-8 (DE-604)BV047393101 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB 978-3-11-073068-5 Epistemic studies volume 47 (DE-604)BV044407301 47 X:MVB https://www.degruyter.com/books/9783110735352 DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032696457&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p vlb 20201107 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb |
| spellingShingle | Constantin, Jan 1989- Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon Epistemic studies Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Epistemologische Überzeugung (DE-588)1113033665 gnd Fallibilismus (DE-588)4250187-8 gnd Rechtfertigung Philosophie (DE-588)4138650-4 gnd Inkongruenz (DE-588)106428129X gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4070914-0 (DE-588)1113033665 (DE-588)4250187-8 (DE-588)4138650-4 (DE-588)106428129X (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |
| title_auth | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |
| title_exact_search | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |
| title_full | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon Jan Constantin |
| title_fullStr | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon Jan Constantin |
| title_full_unstemmed | Epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon Jan Constantin |
| title_short | Epistemic defeat |
| title_sort | epistemic defeat a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |
| title_sub | a treatment of defeat as an independent phenomenon |
| topic | Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Epistemologische Überzeugung (DE-588)1113033665 gnd Fallibilismus (DE-588)4250187-8 gnd Rechtfertigung Philosophie (DE-588)4138650-4 gnd Inkongruenz (DE-588)106428129X gnd |
| topic_facet | Erkenntnistheorie Epistemologische Überzeugung Fallibilismus Rechtfertigung Philosophie Inkongruenz Hochschulschrift |
| url | https://www.degruyter.com/books/9783110735352 http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032696457&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV044407301 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT constantinjan epistemicdefeatatreatmentofdefeatasanindependentphenomenon AT walterdegruytergmbhcokg epistemicdefeatatreatmentofdefeatasanindependentphenomenon |