Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present:
The disciplines of History and Art History are more dependent than is readily acknowledged on often dubious patterns of analogizing. In trying to understand a contemporary event, for example, both mainstream media and more reflective historians resort not infrequently to comparisons. If in History t...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | The disciplines of History and Art History are more dependent than is readily acknowledged on often dubious patterns of analogizing. In trying to understand a contemporary event, for example, both mainstream media and more reflective historians resort not infrequently to comparisons. If in History there is a ‘Napoleon’ of almost anywhere and any situation, in Art History, ‘Picassos’ of this country or that medium abound. Anything but neutral, these apparently casual connections occur with such frequency that they have largely escaped critical attention. In this essay, Mark Cheetham explores the extent to which the many assumptions and mental shortcuts embedded in analogies surreptitiously write art history and history, what rhetorical mechanisms are used, by whom, in what contexts, and with what results. Arguing against visual exceptionalism, Cheetham claims that in art history, analogy is inevitably a potent amalgam of textual and visual thinking, one fully continuous with our creation of the past in the present across the humanities. |
| Beschreibung: | Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 978-0-367-25601-2 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047275260 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210527 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210507s2021 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1250469460 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047275260 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cheetham, Mark A. |d 1954- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)188477012 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present |c Mark A. Cheetham |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Analogous histories? Textual/visual constructions of the past and present |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The disciplines of History and Art History are more dependent than is readily acknowledged on often dubious patterns of analogizing. In trying to understand a contemporary event, for example, both mainstream media and more reflective historians resort not infrequently to comparisons. If in History there is a ‘Napoleon’ of almost anywhere and any situation, in Art History, ‘Picassos’ of this country or that medium abound. Anything but neutral, these apparently casual connections occur with such frequency that they have largely escaped critical attention. In this essay, Mark Cheetham explores the extent to which the many assumptions and mental shortcuts embedded in analogies surreptitiously write art history and history, what rhetorical mechanisms are used, by whom, in what contexts, and with what results. Arguing against visual exceptionalism, Cheetham claims that in art history, analogy is inevitably a potent amalgam of textual and visual thinking, one fully continuous with our creation of the past in the present across the humanities. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kunstwissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4120632-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Geschichtswissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4020535-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Methode |0 (DE-588)4038971-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Geschichtswissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4020535-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kunstwissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4120632-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Methode |0 (DE-588)4038971-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2021 |g pages:173-186 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t History and art history / edited by Nicholas Chare and Mitchell B. Frank |d New York ; London, 2021 |g Seite 173-186 |k Routledge research in art history |w (DE-604)BV047123575 |z 978-0-367-25601-2 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032678885 | ||
| 941 | |j 2021 |s 173-186 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182437290311680 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV047123575 |
| author | Cheetham, Mark A. 1954- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)188477012 |
| author_facet | Cheetham, Mark A. 1954- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Cheetham, Mark A. 1954- |
| author_variant | m a c ma mac |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047275260 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1250469460 (DE-599)BVBBV047275260 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02627naa a2200409 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047275260</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210527 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210507s2021 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1250469460</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047275260</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheetham, Mark A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1954-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)188477012</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark A. Cheetham</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Analogous histories? Textual/visual constructions of the past and present</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The disciplines of History and Art History are more dependent than is readily acknowledged on often dubious patterns of analogizing. In trying to understand a contemporary event, for example, both mainstream media and more reflective historians resort not infrequently to comparisons. If in History there is a ‘Napoleon’ of almost anywhere and any situation, in Art History, ‘Picassos’ of this country or that medium abound. Anything but neutral, these apparently casual connections occur with such frequency that they have largely escaped critical attention. In this essay, Mark Cheetham explores the extent to which the many assumptions and mental shortcuts embedded in analogies surreptitiously write art history and history, what rhetorical mechanisms are used, by whom, in what contexts, and with what results. Arguing against visual exceptionalism, Cheetham claims that in art history, analogy is inevitably a potent amalgam of textual and visual thinking, one fully continuous with our creation of the past in the present across the humanities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstwissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4120632-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichtswissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020535-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038971-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Geschichtswissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020535-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kunstwissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4120632-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038971-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:173-186</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">History and art history / edited by Nicholas Chare and Mitchell B. Frank</subfield><subfield code="d">New York ; London, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Seite 173-186</subfield><subfield code="k">Routledge research in art history</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV047123575</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-367-25601-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032678885</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="s">173-186</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047275260 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:15:20Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:07:32Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 978-0-367-25601-2 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032678885 |
| oclc_num | 1250469460 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| physical | Illustrationen |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Cheetham, Mark A. 1954- Verfasser (DE-588)188477012 aut Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present Mark A. Cheetham Analogous histories? Textual/visual constructions of the past and present 2021 Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The disciplines of History and Art History are more dependent than is readily acknowledged on often dubious patterns of analogizing. In trying to understand a contemporary event, for example, both mainstream media and more reflective historians resort not infrequently to comparisons. If in History there is a ‘Napoleon’ of almost anywhere and any situation, in Art History, ‘Picassos’ of this country or that medium abound. Anything but neutral, these apparently casual connections occur with such frequency that they have largely escaped critical attention. In this essay, Mark Cheetham explores the extent to which the many assumptions and mental shortcuts embedded in analogies surreptitiously write art history and history, what rhetorical mechanisms are used, by whom, in what contexts, and with what results. Arguing against visual exceptionalism, Cheetham claims that in art history, analogy is inevitably a potent amalgam of textual and visual thinking, one fully continuous with our creation of the past in the present across the humanities. Kunstwissenschaft (DE-588)4120632-0 gnd rswk-swf Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd rswk-swf Geschichtswissenschaft (DE-588)4020535-6 gnd rswk-swf Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 gnd rswk-swf Geschichtswissenschaft (DE-588)4020535-6 s Kunstwissenschaft (DE-588)4120632-0 s Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 s Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 s DE-604 year:2021 pages:173-186 History and art history / edited by Nicholas Chare and Mitchell B. Frank New York ; London, 2021 Seite 173-186 Routledge research in art history (DE-604)BV047123575 978-0-367-25601-2 |
| spellingShingle | Cheetham, Mark A. 1954- Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present Kunstwissenschaft (DE-588)4120632-0 gnd Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd Geschichtswissenschaft (DE-588)4020535-6 gnd Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4120632-0 (DE-588)4197814-6 (DE-588)4020535-6 (DE-588)4038971-6 |
| title | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present |
| title_alt | Analogous histories? Textual/visual constructions of the past and present |
| title_auth | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present |
| title_exact_search | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present |
| title_full | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present Mark A. Cheetham |
| title_fullStr | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present Mark A. Cheetham |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present Mark A. Cheetham |
| title_short | Analogous histories? Textual, visual constructions of the past and present |
| title_sort | analogous histories textual visual constructions of the past and present |
| topic | Kunstwissenschaft (DE-588)4120632-0 gnd Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd Geschichtswissenschaft (DE-588)4020535-6 gnd Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kunstwissenschaft Analogie Geschichtswissenschaft Methode |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cheethammarka analogoushistoriestextualvisualconstructionsofthepastandpresent |