The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles: images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA
Edward Elgar Publishing
[2021]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register |
| Beschreibung: | vii, 208 Seiten Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9781789907520 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047272981 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20220919 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210506s2021 |||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781789907520 |c hardback : £80.00 |9 978-1-78990-752-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1264258169 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047272981 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-521 |a DE-12 |a DE-29 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a MK 5250 |0 (DE-625)123079: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MK 5250 |0 (DE-625)123079: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a ML 1100 |0 (DE-625)123137: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a ML 7260 |0 (DE-625)123212: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chaban, Natalia |d 1971- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1139137298 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles |b images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations |c Natalia Chaban (Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Department of Media and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Ole Elgström (Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA |b Edward Elgar Publishing |c [2021] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
| 300 | |a vii, 208 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Selbstbild |0 (DE-588)4077349-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Selbstbild |0 (DE-588)4077349-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Elgström, Ole |d 1950- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)170429105 |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-78990-753-7 |w (DE-604)BV047495160 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20211015 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032676639 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 477 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182432453230592 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents List of tables Acknowledgements vi vii 1 Introduction 2 Theoretical innovations: synergizing role theory with insights from image and perception studies 19 3 Methodology 37 4 The EU as a global and regional power and leader 50 5 The EU as a bilateral partner 79 6 The EU as a mediator (with Michèle Knodt) 99 7 The EU as a public diplomacy actor 122 8 EU self-perceptions and images of its roles 145 9 Comparing perceptions of the EU 160 10 Conclusions: filling gaps in knowledge by theoretical synergy 180 References Index 1 187 203
References Aberbach, A., J. Chesney and В. Rockman (1975), ‘Exploring elite political attitudes: Some methodological lessons’, Political methodology, 2(1), 1-27. Aberbach, A. and B. Rockman (2002), ‘Conducting and coding elite interviews’, Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 673-76. Aggestam, K., A. Bergman Rosamond and A. Kronsell (2019), ‘Theorising feminist foreign policy’, Journal ofInternational Relations, 33(1), 23-39, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://doi.Org/10.l 177/0047117818811892 Aggestam, L. (2006), ‘Role theory and European foreign policy: A framework of analysis’, in O. Elgström and M. Smith (eds), The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 11-29. Aggestam, L. (2015), ‘Transformative power or political dwarf? European leadership and global imbalances’, in A. Bakardieva Engelbrekt, M. Mårtensson, L. Oxelheim and T. Persson (eds), The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 16-34. Alexander, M.G., M.B. Brewer and R.W. Livingstone (2005a), ‘Putting stereotype content in context: Image theory and interethnic stereotypes’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 781-94. Alexander, M.G., S. Levin and P.J. Henry (2005b), ‘Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images’, Political Psychology, 26(1), 27-45. Amadio Viceré, M.G. (2020), ‘The cases of Kosovo and Ukraine suggest a fragmented EU foreign policy’, Future of Europe blog, 8 October, accessed 30 October 2020
at http://fijtureofeurope.ideasoneurope.eu/2020/10/08/amadio-eu-foreign-policy -kosovo-ukraine/ Averre, D. and K. Wolczuk (eds) (2016), ‘The Ukrainian crisis and the post-post-Cold War Europe’, Europe-Asia Studies, Special Issue, 68(4), 551-55. Babenko, V, Y. Biletaka and H. Pelyak (2020), ‘Ukraine-EU: Economic integration strategy’, Geopolitics under Globalization, 3(1), 12-23. Bachmann, V. and M. Müller (eds) (2015), Looking in from the Outside: Perceptions of the EU in Eastern Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Bäckstrand, К. and O. Elgström (2013), ‘The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: From leader to “leadiator”’, Journal ofEuropean Public Policy, 20(10), 1369-86. Bain, J. andN. Chaban (2017), ‘Emerging EU strategic narrative?: Twitter dialogues on the EU’s sustainable energy week’, Comparative European Politics, 15(1), 135-55. Bain, J., N. Chaban and S. Kelly (2012), ‘Crumbling giant, rising dragon?: Chinese news media cartoon reflections on the Eurozone debt crisis’, Communication, Politics and Culture, 45(2), 217-39. Barbé, E., A. Herranz-Surrales and M. Natorski (2014), ‘Model, player or instrument for global governance: Metaphors in the discourse and practice of EU foreign policy’, in C. Carta and F. Morin (eds), EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of 187
188 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity, Famham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 111-30. Beardsley, K. (2009), ‘Intervention without leverage: Explaining the prevalence of weak mediators’, International Interactions, 35(3), 272-97. Bengtsson, R. and O. Elgström (2012), ‘Conflicting role conceptions? The European Union in global politics’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 93-108. Bergmann, J., T. Haastrup, A. Niemann and R. Whitman (eds) (2018), Special Issue ‘The European Union as international mediator’, International Negotiations, 23(2), 157-76. Bergmann, J. and A. Niemann (2015), ‘Mediating international conflicts: The European Union as an effective peacemaker?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5), 957-75. Berry, J. (2002), ‘Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing’, Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679-82. Bickerton, C. (2011), European Union Foreign Policy. From Effectiveness to Functionality, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Biddle, B.J. and E.J. Thomas (eds) (1966), Role Theory: Expectations, Identities and Behaviors, New York: John Wiley Sons. Björkdahl, A., N. Chaban, J. Leslie and A. Masselot (eds) (2015), Importing EU norms? Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht: Springer. Björkdahl, A. and O. Elgström (2015), ‘The EPA-negotiations: A channel for norm export and import?’, in A. Björkdahl, N. Chaban, J. Leslie and A. Masselot (eds), Importing EU Norms? Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht: Springer, pp.
133-52. Blunder, J., J. McLeod and K. Rosengren (1992), ‘An introduction to comparative communication research’, in J. Blunder, J. McLeod and K. Rosengren (eds), Comparatively Speaking: Communication and Culture across Space and Time, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 3-18. Bobritskij, D. and M. Shashkova (2020), ‘Год Зеленского. Победы и поражения действующего президента’, Novoe Vremya, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://nv.ua/ ukraine/politics/vladimir-zelenskiy-god-na-pozicii-prezidenta-ukrainy-dostizhenie-i -provaly-novosti-ukrainy-50083394.html Borrell, J. (2020), ‘Embracing Europe’s power’, Project Syndicate, 8 February, accessed 21 June 2020 at https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/embracing -europe-s-power-by-josep-borrell-2020-02?barrier=accesspaylog Boulding, K.E. (1956), The Image, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Boulding, K.E. (1959), ‘National images and international systems’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), 120-31. Brader, T. and G.E. Marcus (2013), ‘Emotion and political psychology’, in L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 165-204. Braudel, F. (1958), ‘Histoire et Sciences sociales: La longue durée’, Annales, 13(4), 725-53. Braudel, F. (1982), On History (S. Matthews, trans.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1969). C3EU (n.d.), ‘Crisis, conflict and critical diplomacy: EU perceptions in Ukraine, Israel and Palestine’, accessed 21 October 2019 at https://jeanmonnet.nz/c3eu/ Carey, S. (2002), ‘Undivided loyalties: Is national
identity an obstacle to European integration?’, European Union Politics, 3(4), 387-413.
References 189 Carnevale, P. and S. Arad (1996), ‘Bias and impartiality in international mediation’, in J. Bercovitch (ed.), Resolving International Conflicts. The Theory and Practice of Negotiation, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 39-53. Carta, C. (2014), ‘From the “magnificent castle” to the brutish state of nature: Use of metaphor and the analysis of the EU’s international discourse’, in C. Carta and F. Morin (eds), EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense ofDiversity, Famham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 191-207. Castano. E., S. Sacchi and P. Gries (2003), ‘The perceptions of the Other in inter national relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity’, Political Psychology, 24(3), 449-68. Cercas, J. (2020), ‘The EU was created to keep nationalism in check. Coronavirus is a dangerous test’, The Guardian, 15 April, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://www .theguardian.com/books/2020/apr/15/the-eu-was-created-to-keep-nationalism-in -check-coronavirus-is-a-dangerous-test?CMP=share_btn_link Chaban, N. (2020), ‘Perceptions, expectations, motivations: Evolution of Canadian views on the EU’, Australian and New Zealand Journal ofEuropean Studies, 11(3), 45-62. Chaban, N. and A. Chaban (2018), ‘Communicating Europe beyond its borders: Imagining the EU in Ukraine post-Maidan’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 23(1/1), 119-38. Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2018a), ‘Constructing bridges and fostering growth: Interdisciplinary insights into European Union role conceptions and prescriptions’, Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 2018(17), 24-36.
Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2018b), On a journey with uncertain destination. Metaphors and images of the European Union in Russian and Ukrainian media after Brexit vote’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 23(1/1), 159-76. Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2020), ‘A perceptual approach to EU public diplomacy: Investigating collaborative diplomacy in EU-Ukraine relations’, The Hague Journal ofDiplomacy, 15(4), 488-516. Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2021a), ‘Politicization of EU development policy: The role of EU external perceptions (case of Ukraine)’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(1), first online https://doi.org/10.llll/jcms.13137 Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2021b), ‘Theorizing external perceptions of the EU’, in S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz (eds), Studying the EU s External Action: Concepts, Approaches, Theories, London: Macmillan Intemational/Red Globe Press, pp. 265-79. Chaban, N., O. Elgström and O. Gulyaeva (2017a), ‘Russian images of the European Union: Before and after Maidan’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(2), 480-99. Chaban, N., O. Elgström, S. Kelly and L.S. Yi (2013), ‘Images of the EU beyond its borders: Issue-specific and regional perceptions of European Union power and lead ership’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(3), 433-51. Chaban, N. and M. Holland (eds) (2008), The European Union and the Asia-Pacific: Media, Public and Elite Perceptions ofthe EU, London and New York: Routledge. Chaban, N. and M. Holland (eds) (2013), ‘Lisbon and the changing external percep tions of the EU: Visions from the Asia-Pacific’, Baltic Journal ofEuropean Studies, Special Issue,
3(3). Chaban, N. and M. Holland (2014), ‘The evolution of EU perceptions: From single studies to systematic research’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Communicating Europe in Times ofCrisis: External Perceptions ofthe European Union, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 1-23.
190 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Chaban, N. and M. Holland (2015), ‘EU external perceptions: From innovation to an established field of study’, in A. Kalland Aarstad, E. Drieskens, K.E. Jørgensen, К. Laatikainen and В. Tonra (eds), Handbook of European Foreign Policy, London: Sage, pp. 672-86. Chaban N. and M. Holland (2018), ‘Introduction: Partners and perceptions’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Shaping the EU’s Global Strategy: Partners and Perceptions, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 1-26. Chaban, N., M. Holland and P. Ryan (eds) (2009), The EU through the Eyes ofAsia: New Cases, New Findings, Singapore and London: World Scientific. Chaban, N. and S. Kelly (2017), ‘Tracing the evolution of EU images using a case-study ofAustralia and New Zealand ’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 55(4), 691-708. Chaban, N., S. Kelly and J. Bain (2014), ‘En‘vision’ing Europe’s Crisis: A visual and textual analysis of the EU imagery in Chinese, Indian and Russian business newspa pers’, Journal ofInternational Communication, 20(1), 1-20. Chaban, N., S. Kelly and A. Rayroux (2018a), ‘Communicating the EU externally: Media framing of the EU’s irregular migration crisis (case-studies of New Zealand and Canada)’, in R. Bengtsson and M. Rosén Sundström (eds), The EU and the Emerging Global Order: Essays in Honour ofOle Elgström, Lund: Lund University, pp. 197-222. Chaban, N. and M. Knodt (2020), ‘Perceptions of the EU in Ukraine after “Brexit” referendum: Images of capabilities and opportunities’, in N. Chaban, A. Niemann and J. Spreyer (eds), Changing Perceptions of
the EU at Times of Brexit: Global Perspectives, Abington and NY : Routledge, pp. 78-95. Chaban, N., M. Knodt and J. Headley (eds) (2018b), ‘The EU and its eastern neigh bours: Perceptions and strategic dialogue in the region’, European Foreign Affairs Review, Special Issue, 23(1/1). Chaban, N., M. Knodt and A. Verdun (eds) (2017b), ‘External images of the EU energy power across the globe’, Comparative European Politics, Special Issue, 15(1). Chaban, N. and S. Lucarelli (2021), ‘Reassessing external images of the EU: Evolving narratives in times of crisis’, European Foreign Policy Review, 26(1), 177-96. Chaban, N., A. Niemann and J. Speyer (eds) (2020), Changing Perceptions ofthe EU at Times ofBrexit: Global Perspectives, Abington and NY: Routledge. Chaban, N. and B. O’Loughlin (2018), ‘The EU’s crisis diplomacy in Ukraine: The matrix of possibilities’, Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5), accessed 19 June 2020 at https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/eus-crisis-diplomacy-ukraine-matrix -possibilities Chaban, N. and A-M. Magdalena (2014), ‘External perceptions of the EU during the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(2), 195-220. Chaban, N., A. Masselot and K. Vadura (eds) (2015), ‘“Rising” Asia and “Normative Power Europe”: New perspectives in the dialogue on norms and values’, Special Issue, Asia-Europe Journal, 13(3). Chaban, N., A. Miskimmon and B. O’Loughlin (2017c), ‘The EU’s peace and security narrative: Views from EU strategic partners in Asia’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(6). 1273-89. Chaban, N., A. Miskimmon and B. O’Loughlin
(eds) (2019), ‘Understanding the scope and limits of EU diplomacy: Connecting strategic narrative to EU external percep tions research’, European Security, Special Issue, 28(3). Chaban, N., N. Smith and M. Holland (2010), ‘The potential of return migration as a resource for EU public diplomacy efforts: A case-study of New Zealand return
References 191 migrants from the EU’, European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 1(4), 378-98. Chaban, N. and S. Zhabotynska (eds) (2018), ‘Crisis, conflict and critical diplomacy: Communicating the EU in Ukraine’, Cognition, Communication, Discourse, Special Issue, 17. Chalmers, J. and K. Abnett (2021), ‘EU rejects accusations of “vaccine nationalism’”, Reuters, March 10, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.reuters.com/article/us -health-coronavirus-eu-michel-idUSKBN2B 11YM Charteris-Black, J. (2004), Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Cienki, A. and D. Yanow (2013), ‘Linguistic approaches to analyzing policies and the political’, Journal ofInternational Relations and Development, 16(2), 167-310. Cohen, H. (n.d.), ‘What is an image?’, accessed 26 October 2013 at http://aaronshome .com/aaron/publications/whatisanimage.pdf Cooper, A.F., R.A. Higgott and K.R. Nossal (1993), Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order, Vancouver: UBC Press. Cooper, R. (2003), The Breaking of National: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century, London: Atlantic Books. Cottam, M. (1986), Foreign Policy Decision Making, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Cottam, M. and S. Chih-yu (eds) (1992), Contending Dramas. A Cognitive Approach to International Organizations, New York: Praeger. Cottam, R. (1977), Foreign Policy Motivation: A General Theory and a Case Study, Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press. Council of the European Union (2003), European Security Strategy, 8 December, accessed 19 June 2020
at http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15895 -2003-INIT/en/pdf Cowan, G. and A. Arsenault (2008), ‘Moving from monologue to dialogue to collabo ration: The layers of public diplomacy’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10-30. Creswell, J.W. and J.D. Creswell (2018), Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th edition, Los Angeles: Sage. Cull, N.J. (2008), ‘Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories’, The ANNALS of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54. Davis Cross, M. and I. Karolewski (eds) (2017a), ‘Europe’s hybrid foreign policy: The Ukraine-Russia crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Special Issue, 55(1). Davis Cross, M. and I. Karolewski (2017b), ‘What type of power has the EU exercised in the Ukraine-Russia crisis? A framework of analysis’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 55(1), 3-19. de Vreese, C. (2001), ‘Europe in the news. A cross-national comparative study of the new news coverage of key EU events’, European Union Politics, 2(3): 283-307. Dickinson, P. (2021), ‘Putin plots Ukraine peace talks without Ukraine’, Atlantic Council, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ ukrainealert/putin-plots-ukraine-peace-talks-without-ukraine/ Didelon-Loiseau, C. and C. Grasland (2014), ‘Internal and external perceptions of Europe/the EU in the world through mental maps’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Communicating Europe in the Times of Crisis: External Perceptions of the European Union, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 65-94.
Disaggregating Chinese perceptions ofthe EU and the implications for the EU’s China policy, accessed 30 November 2020 at http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/54186_en .html
192 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Dixon, R. and N. Gryvnyak (2020), ‘Ukraine’s Zelensky wants to end a war in the east. His problem: No one agrees how to do it’, Washington Post, 20 March, accessed 1 December 2020 at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/ukraines -zelensky-wants-to-end-a-war-in-the-east-his-problem-no-one-agrees-how-to-do-it/ 2020/03/19/ae653cbc-6399-l Iea-8a8e-5c5336b32760_story.html Dominguez, R. (2018), ‘Strategic partner and model of governance: EU perceptions in Mexico’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Shaping the EU Global Strategy Partners and Perceptions, New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 147-64. Dubey, M. (1985), ‘The main forces at work’, in A.S. Lali (ed.), Multilateral Negotiation and Mediation: Instruments and Methods, New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 154-81. Duchêne, F. (1972), ‘Europe’s role in world peace’, in R. Mayne (ed.), Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, London: Fontana, pp. 32-47. Duffy, B. (2018), The Perils ofPerceptions, London: Atlantic Books. Duke, S. (2013), ‘The European external action service and public diplomacy’, Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendaeľ, accessed 8 May 2020 at https://www.eipa.eu/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/11/20131009144127_TheEuropeanExtemalActionService-1 .pdf Dwyer, K. (1982), Moroccan Dialogues: Anthropology in Question, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012), ‘Cosmopolitan politicization? Relating public perceptions of interdependence and expectations in internationalized governance’,
European Journal ofInternational Relations, 18(3), 481-508. EEAS (European External Action Service) (2018), ‘Remarks by High Representative/ Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the joint press point with Mr Volodymyr Groysman, Prime Minister of Ukraine’, 12 March, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/41162/remarks-high -representativevice-president-federica-mogherini-joint-press-point-mr-volodymyr _en EEAS (European External Action Service) (2020), ‘EU-Ukraine relations - factsheet’, 10 June, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters -homepage_en/4081/%20EU-Ukraine%20relations,%20factsheet EEAS (European External Action Service) (n.d.), ‘EU delegations. Ukraine’, accessed 12 April at https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine_en Elgström, О. (2000), Images and Strategies for Autonomy, Dordrecht: Kluwer. Elgström, О. (2006), ‘The Presidency: The role(s) of the Chair in European Union negotiations’, The Hague Journal ofDiplomacy, 1(2), 171-95. Elgström, О. (2007a), ‘The European Union as a leader in international multilateral negotiations ֊ a problematic aspiration?’, International Relations, 21(4), 445-58. Elgström, О. (2007b), Outsiders’ perceptions of the EU in international trade negotia tions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 949-67. Elgström, О. (2008), ‘Images of the EU in EPA negotiations: Angel, demon - or just human?’, European Integration On-line Journal, 12(5), 1-12. Elgström, О. (2014), ‘Leader, bridge-builder or hobbled giant: Perceptions of the EU in climate change
negotiations’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Communicating Europe in the Times ofCrisis: External Perceptions ofthe European Union, London: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 27-44. Elgström, О. (2015), ‘External perceptions ofthe EU : Obstacle or asset in the fight against global imbalances’, in A. Bakardieva Engelbrekt, M. Mårtensson, L. Oxelheim and
References 193 T. Persson (eds), The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 250֊68. Elgström, O., J. Bercovitch and C. Skau (2003), ‘Regional organizations and interna tional mediation: The effectiveness of insider mediators’, African Journal ofConflict Resolution, 3(1), 11-27. Elgström, О. and N. Chaban (2015), ‘To study external perceptions of the EU: A conceptual approach’, in V. Bachmann and M. Miiller (eds), Looking in from the Outside: Perceptions of the EU in Eastern Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 17-33. Elgström, О., N. Chaban, M. Knodt, P. Müller and S. Pardo (2018), ‘Perceptions of the EU’s role in the Ukraine-Russian and the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts: A biased mediator?’, International Negotiation, 23(2), 299-318. Elgström, О. and M. Smith (eds) (2006), The European Union ’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, London: Routledge. Entman, R.M. (1993), ‘Framing: Towards the understanding of the fractured para digm’. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58. Entman, R. M. (2003), ‘Cascading activation: Contesting the White House s frame after 9/11’, Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432. EU Global Perceptions (n.d.), https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/ncre/research/ euperceptions/ EU Global Strategy (2016), ‘Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy’, accessed 23 September 2019 at http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs review _web.pdf EUmagine
(n.d.), ‘Imagining Europe from the outside’, project, accessed 19 June 2020 at http://www.eumagine.org/default.aspx EuroBroadMap (n.d.), accessed 19 June 2020 at http://www.eurobroadmap.eu/ EuropeAid (2010), Opinion polling and research in the ENPI countries and territories (OPPOL): Country report on the opinion poll 1, Ukraine’, 127122/C/SER/Multi, accessed at 21 October 2019 http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/documents/ press_releases/ua_report_uk.pdf European Commission (2017), ‘Flash Eurobarometer 450: Future of Europe - views from outside the EU’, report, accessed 20 June 2020 at http://ec.europa.eu/ commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/ 79589 European Commission (2021), ‘EU disburses €600 million in macro-financial assis tance to Ukraine’, 9 December, accessed 11 April 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/ neighbourhood-enlargement/news_comer/news/eu-disburses-%E2%82%AC600 -million-macro-financial-assistance-ukraine_en#:~:text=The%20European %20Commission%2C%20on%20behalf,financial%20assistance%20(MFA) %20programme. text=The%20Commission%20is%20working%20closely,of %20the%20agreed%20policy%20programme European Commission (n.d.), ‘Cultural diplomacy platform’, accessed 8 May 2020 at http://www.cultureinextemalrelations.eu/ European Council (2019), ‘EU-Ukraine summit’, meetings: International summit, Kyiv, Ukraine, 8 July, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ en/meetings/international-summit/2019/07/08/ European Council (n.d.), ‘EU relations with Ukraine’, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://
www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eastem-partnership/ukraine/
194 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner (2002), The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books. Fisher, G. (1997), Mindsets: The Role of Culture and Perception in International Relations, 2nd edition, Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press. Fiske de Gouveia, P. (2005), European Infopolitik: Developing EU Public Diplomacy Strategy, London: Foreign Policy Centre. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2007), ‘Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective’, The Hague Journal ofDiplomacy, 2(3), 187-211. Flanik, W. (2011), ‘Bringing FPA back home: Cognition, constructivism, and concep tual metaphor’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 7, 423—46. Garton Ash, T. (2017), ‘Is Europe disintegrating?’, The New York Review ofBooh, 19 January. Goatly, A. (1997), The Language ofMetaphors, London: Routledge. Goddard, C. (2004), ‘The ethnopragmatism and semantics of “active” metaphors’, Journal ofPragmatics, 36(7), 1211-30. Goldmann, К. (1988), Change and Stability in Foreign Policy, Princeton: Princeton Legacy Library. Goldstein, J. and R.O. Keohane (1993), ‘Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical frame work’, in J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 3-30. Gottlieb, A. (1991), ‘I’ll be with you in a Minute, Mr. Ambassador’: The Education of a Canadian Diplomat in Washington, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Gregory, B. (2008), ‘Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field’, The ANNALS of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social
Science, 616(1), 274-91. Greig, J.M and P.F. Diehl (2016), International Mediation, Cambridge: Polity Press. Grubb, M. and J. Gupta (2000), ‘Leadership. Theory and methodology’, in J. Gupta and M. Grubb (eds), Climate Change and European Leadership: A Sustainable Role for Europe?, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 15-24. Hamati-Ataya, I. (2012), ‘Beyond (post)positivism: The missed promises of systemic pragmatism’, International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 291-305. Harnisch, S. (2011), ‘Role theory: Operationalization of key concepts’, in S. Harnisch, C. Frank and H.W. Maull (eds), Role Theory in International Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 7-15. Hämisch, S. (2012), ‘Conceptualizing in the minefield: Role theory and foreign policy learning’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 47-69. Hämisch, S. (2015), ‘Role theory and the study of Chinese foreign policy’, in S. Hämisch, S. Bersick and J.C. Gottwald (eds), China ’s International Roles, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 3-21. Hämisch, S., C. Frank and H.W. Maull (eds) (2011), Role Theory in International Relations, London: Routledge. Heath, C. and D. Heath (2007), Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Take Hold and Others Come Unstuck, London: Random House. Hermann, M.G. and C.W. Kegley Jr. (1995), ‘Rethinking democracy and international peace: Perspectives from political psychology’, International Studies Quarterly, 39(4), 511-33. Herrmann, R.K. (1984), ‘Perceptions and foreign policy analysis’, in D.A. Sylvan and S. Chan (eds), Foreign Policy Decision Making: Perception, Cognition and Artificial Intelligence, New York: Praeger, pp. 25-52.
Herrmann, R.K. (1985), Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
References 195 Herrmann, R.K. (2013), ‘Perceptions and image theory in international relations’, in L. Huddy, D.O. Sears and J.S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 334—63. Herrmann, R.K. (2021), Concluding remarks. FPA Distinguished Scholar Panel Honoring Richard Herrmann, International Studies Association (ISA) Virtual Convention, 8 April. Herrmann, R.K. and M.P. Fischerkeller (1995), ‘Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: Cognitive-strategic research after the Cold War’, International Organization, 49(3), 415-50. Herrmann, R.K., J.F. Voss, T.Y.E. Schooler and J. Ciarrochi (1997), ‘Images in international relations: An experimental test of cognitive schemata’, International Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 403-33. Hill, C. (1993), ‘The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s interna tional role’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305-28. Hocking, B. (2005), ‘Rethinking the “new” public diplomacy’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The Nev Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 28-46. Hollis, M. and S. Smith (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Holsti, К. (1970), ‘National role conceptions in the study offoreign policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233-309. Hopmann, J.T. (1996), The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Huddy, L., D.O. Sears and J.S. Levy (eds) (2013), The Oxford Handbook of Political
Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press. Hülsse, R. (2006), ‘Imagine the EU: The metaphorical construction of a supranational identity’, Journal ofInternational Relations and Development, 9, 396-421. Hurd, I. (1999), ‘Legitimacy and authority in international politics’, International Organization, 53(2), 379-408. Hyde-Price, A. (2008), ‘A “tragic actor”? A realist perspective on “ethical power Europe’”, International Affairs, 84(1), 29-44. IARPA 2011 (2011), ‘Metaphor program’, Washington DC: Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Isani, M. and B. Schlipphak (2017), ‘The desire for sovereignty - an explanation of EU attitudes in the Arab world’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 55(3), 502-17. Ivashchenko-Stadnik, K., R. Petrov, P. Rieker and A. Russo (2018), ‘Implementation of the EU’s crisis response in Ukraine’, EUNPACK Working Paper, January, accessed 19 June 2020 at http://www.eunpack.eu/sites/default/files/publications/ 2018-01-31 %20D6.3%20W orking%20paper%20on%20implementation%20of %20EU%20crisis%20response%20in%20Ukraine.pdf Jelisié, J. (2012), ‘Developing public diplomacy for supporting EU accession: Lessons to be learned at the Western Balkans’, in M. Andrlić and A. Gustović-Ercegovac (eds), The 13th CEI Dubrovnik Diplomatic Forum Strategic Public Diplomacy, Diplomatic Academy Proceedings 9, pp. 33-54. Jervis, R. (1976), Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jupille, J. and J.A. Caporaso (1998), ‘States, agency, and rules: The European Union in global environmental politics’, in C. Rhodes
(ed.), The European Union in the World Community, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 213-29.
196 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Kanét, R. (2015), ‘The failed Western challenge to Russia’s revival in Eurasia?’, International Politics, 52(5), 503-22. Kelly, S., F. Doser and N. Chaban (2021), ‘Shifting frames: Images of Brexit in NZ and possible consequences’, in K. Haba and M. Holland (eds), Brexit and After, Singapore: Springer, pp. 159-79. Kelman, Herbert C. (1966), International Behavior: A Social Psychological Analysis, New York: Halt, Rinehart and Winston. Kennedy, L. and S. Lucas (2005), ‘Enduring freedom: Public diplomacy and U.S. foreign policy’, American Quarterly, 57(2), 309-33. Keuleers, F. (2017), European Union and Chinese Strategic Narratives towards Africa: A Mixed Methods Study ofReception by African Audiences, PhD Thesis. Keuleers, F., D. Fonck and S. Keukeleire (2016), ‘Beyond EU navel-gazing: Taking stock of EU-centrism in the analysis of EU foreign policy’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(3), 345-64. Kevin, D. (2003), Europe in the Media, London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kilian, В. and О. Elgström (2010), ‘Still a green leader? The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations’, Cooperation and Conflict, 45(3), 255-73. Kleiboer, M. (1998), International Mediation: The Multiple Realities of Third-Party Intervention, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Klose, S. (2018), ‘Theorizing the EU’s actomess: Towards an interactionist role theory framework’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(5), 1144-60. Klose, S. (2019), ‘The emergence and evolution of an external actor’s regional role: An interactionist role theory perspective’, Cooperation
and Conflict, 54(3), 426-41. Knodt, M, N. Chaban and L. Nielsen (2017), Bilateral Energy Relations between the EU and Emerging Powers: Mutual Perception of the EU and Brazil, China, India and South Africa, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Korski, D. (2008), ‘Making Europe’s voice louder’, European Council on Foreign Relations, accessed 7 December 2013 at www.ecfr.eu/content/entry/commentary _making_europes_voice_louder Kövecses, Z. (2000), ‘The scope of metaphor’, in A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 79-92. Kövecses, Z. (2002), Metaphor. A Practical Introduction, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Krastev, I. (2017), After Europe, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Krippendorf, К. (1980), Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, Beverly Hills: Sage. Kübler-Ross, E. (1973), On Death and Dying, Oxfordshire: Taylor Francis. Kuzio, T. (2015a), Ukraine. Democratization, Corruption and the New Russian Imperialism, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Kuzio, T. (2015b), ‘Why Russia should be added to the state sponsors of terrorism list’, Foreign Affairs, 25 January, accessed 19 June 2020 https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/russian-federation/2015-01-25/ukraine-reignites Kuzio, T. (2017), ‘Ukraine between a constrained EU and assertive Russia’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 103-20. Kydd, A. (2003), ‘Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation’, American Journal ofPolitical Science, 47(4), 597-611. Lakoff, G. (1991), ‘Metaphor and war: the metaphor system used
to justify war in the gulf, Peace Research, 23(2/3), 25-32.
References 197 Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Larsen, H. (2014), ‘The EU as a normative power and the research on external percep tions: The missing link’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 896-910. Larson, D.W. (1985), Origins ofContainment: A Psychological Explanation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Leech, B.L. (2002), ‘Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews’, Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665-68. Lending, M. (2000), Change and Renewal: Norwegian Foreign Cultural Policy 2001-2005, Oslo: Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Lucarelli, S. (ed.) (2007), ‘Beyond self-perception: The others’ view of the European Union’, European Foreign Affairs Review, Special Issue, 12(3). Lucarelli, S. (2014), ‘Seen from the outside: The state of the art on the external image of the EU’, Journal ofEuropean Integration, 36(1), 1-16. Lucarelli, S. and L. Fioramonti (2009), External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor, London: Routledge. Lucarelli, S. and I. Manners (2006), Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy, London: Routledge. Luntumbue, V. (2019), ‘The European Union as a middle power’, 2 May, accessed 15 June 2020 at https://europeglobalactor.cei.iscte-iul.pt/the-european-union-as-a -middle-power/ Lynch, D. (2005),‘Communicating Europe to the world: What public diplomacy for the EU?’, EPC Working Paper, Brussels: European Policy Centre, No. 21. Maines, R. (1995), ‘“Leader” and “entrepreneur” in international negotiations: A con
ceptual analysis’, European Journal ofInternational Relations, 1(1), 87-112. Manners, I. (2002), ‘Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-58. Maoz, Z. and L. Terris (2006), ‘Credibility and strategy in international mediation’, International Interactions, 32(4), 409-40. Maoz, Z. and L. Tems (2008), ‘Credibility and strategy in international mediation’, in J. Bercovitch and S. Gartner (eds), International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings, London: Routledge, Chapter 4. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis ofPolitics, New York: The Free Press. Marks, M.P. (2011), Metaphors in International Relations Theory, New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Marks, M.P. (2018), Revisiting Metaphors in International Relations Theory, New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Mayer, H. (2013), ‘The challenge of coherence and consistency in EU foreign policy’, in M. Telò and F. Ponjaert (eds), The EU’s Foreign Policy: What Kind ofPower and Diplomatic Action?, Famham: Ashgate, pp. 105-17. McCombs, M.E. and D.L. Shaw (1972), ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-87. McDonald, A. (2021), ‘EU’s UK ambassador denies ”vaccine nationalism” amid export row’, Politico, 11 March, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.politico.eu/ article/eus-uk-ambassador-denies-vaccine-nationalism-amid-export-row/ McLaren, L. (2002), ‘Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefits analysis or perceived cultural threat?’, The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551-66.
198 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Melissen, J. (2005a), ‘Introduction’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. xix-xxiv. Melissen, J. (2005b), ‘The new public diplomacy between theory and practice’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 3-27. Meunier, S. and K. Nicolaïdis (2005), ‘The European Union as a trade power’, in C. Hill and M. Smith (eds), International Relations and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247-69. Michalski, A. (2005), ‘The EU as a soft power: The force of persuasion’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 124^44. Mills, C.W. (1956), The Power Elite, New York: Oxford University Press. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine (MFA of Ukraine) (n.d.), accessed 19 June 2020 at https://ukraine-eu.mfa.gov.ua/en/2633-relations Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (n.d.), ‘Euro-Atlantic integration’, accessed 12 April 2021 at https://mvs.gov.ua/en/ministry/euro-atlantic-integration Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin and L. Roselle (2013), Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order, New York: Routledge. Monnet, J. (1976), Mémoires, Paris: Fayard. Morozova, O. (2019), ‘Ukraine’s journey to Europe: Strategie macronarrative and conceptual metaphors’, European Security, 28(3), 323—40. Movahedi, S. (1985), ‘The social psychology of foreign policy and the
politics of inter national images’, Human Affairs, 8(19), 18-37. NATO (2020), ‘NATO recognises Ukraine as enhanced opportunities partner’, accessed 26 June 2020 at https://www.nato. int/cps/en/natohq/news_176327.htm Natorski, M. (2016), ‘The EU and crisis in Ukraine: Policy continuity in times of disor der?’, in D. Bouris and T. Schumacher (eds), The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy. Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 177-96. Natorski, M. (2018), ‘EU mediation practices in Ukraine during revolutions: What authority as a peacemaker?’, International Negotiation, 23(2), 278-98. Natorski, M. and K. Pomorska (2017), ‘Trust and decision-making in times of crisis: The EU’s response to the events in Ukraine’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 54-70. Neagu, M.-I. (2013), Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation, New York: Pal grave Macmillan. Neuman, W.R., M. Just and A.N. Crigler (1992), Common Knowledge: News and the Construction ofPolitical Meaning, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Nossal, K.R. (2010), ‘“Middlepowerhood” and “Middlepowermanship” in Canadian foreign policy’, in N. Hynek and D. Bosold (eds), Canada’s Foreign and Security Policy: Soft and Hard Strategies ofa Middle Power, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 20-34. Nye, J., Jr. (2007), Understanding International Conflict: An Introduction to Theory and History, New York: Pearson Longman. Nye, J., Jr. (2008), ‘Public diplomacy and soft power’, The Annals of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, 616(1),
94-109. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2021), ‘Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 1 August 2020 to 31 January
References 199 2021’, accessed 12 April 2021 at https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/ 31 stReportUkraine-en.pdf. Olsen, H. (2021), Opinion: Vaccine nationalism is a corrective to often-naive views of globalism’, The Washington Post, 27 March, accessed 10 April 2021 at https:// www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/26/vaccine-nationalism-proves-that -globalists-support-multilaterialism-until-it-no-longer-suits-them/ Oppermann, К. and A. Spencer (2013), ‘Thinking alike? Salience and metaphor anal ysis as cognitive approaches to foreign policy analysis’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 9(1), 39-56. Orenstein, M. and R.D. Kelemen (2017), ‘Trojan horses in EU foreign policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 87-102. Ortega, M. (ed.) (2004), Global Views on the European Union, Chaillot Paper, No. 72, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/ISS_EU _chai72e.pdf Pan, Z. and G. Kosicki (1993), ‘Framing analysis: An approach to new discourse’, Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75. Pardo, S. (2015), Normative Power Europe Meets Israel: Fundamentals on IsraeliEuropean Union Relations, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Parker, C., C. Karlsson, M. Hjerpe and В-O. Linnér (2012), ‘Fragmented climate change leadership. Making sense of the ambiguous COP-15 outcome’, Environmental Politics, 21(2), 268-86. Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Payne, R. (2013), Global Issues, New York: Pearson. PPMI/NCRE/ NFG (2015), ‘Analysis of the perceptions of the EU and the EU’s poli cies abroad’,
Commissioned by European External Action Service (EEAS), accessed 8 May 2020 at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/fpi/showcases/eujperceptions_study_en.htm Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (2019), ‘Death toll up to 13,000 in Ukraine conflict, says UN Rights Office’, 26 February, accessed 12 April 2021 at https://www.rfer։ .org/a/death-toll-up-to-13-000-m-ukraine-conflict-says-un-rights-office/29791647 .html# :~:text=%220HCHR%20estimates%20the%20total%20number,%2212 %2C800%2D 13%2C000%20killed.%22 Rapport, A. (2017), ‘Cognitive approaches to foreign policy analysis’, Oxford Research Encyclopaedias. Politics, accessed 9 April 2021 at https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190228637.013.397 Rasmussen, S. (2009), ‘Discourse analysis of EU public diplomacy messages and practices’, Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, accessed 8 May 2020 at https://www.clingendael.org/sites/ default/files/pdfs/20090700_cdsp_discussion_paper_l 15_Rasmussen.pdf Rayroux, A. (2018), ‘The EU’s reputation in Canada: Still a shallow strategic part nership?’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Shaping the EU s Global Strategy: Partners and Perceptions, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 55-76. Razumkov Centre (2016a), ‘Ukrainian identity: Changes, trends, regional aspects’, National Security and Defence, 3-4, accessed 21 June 2020 at http://razumkov.org . ua/uploads/j oumal/eng/NSD 161 -162J2016_eng.pdf Razumkov Centre (2016b), ‘Зовнішньополітичні орієнтації громадян України’, accessed 21 October 2019 at: http://razumkov.org.ua/napryamki/sotsiolohichni
-doslidzhennia/rezultaty-sotsiolohichnoho-doslidzhennia-tsentru-razumkova -zovnishnopolitychni-oriientatsii-hromadian-ukrainy
200 7%e Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Riordan, S. (2005), ‘Dialogue-based public diplomacy: A new foreign policy para digm?’, in J. Melissen (ed.). The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 180-95. Rosén Sundström, M. and O. Elgström (2019), ‘Praise or critique? Sweden’s feminist foreign policy in the eyes of its fellow EU members’, European Politics and Society, DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1661940 Savim, В. (2008), ‘Information, bias, and mediation success’, International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 25-47. Schafer, M. (1997), ‘Images and policy preferences’, Political Psychology, 18(4), 813-29. Schaffer, F. (2016), Elucidating Social Science Concepts. An Interpretivist Guide, Abington and NY : Routledge. Scharpf, F. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schengenvisainfo.news (2020), ‘Ukrainians have made nearly 49 million trips to EU, during three years of visa-free travel’, 19 April, accessed 12 April 2021 at https:// www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/ukrainians-have-made-nearly-49-million-trips-to -eu-during-three-years-of-visa-ffee-travel/ Schiller, F. (1803), ‘An die Freunde’, Poem. Sheahan, L.,N. Chaban, O. Elgström andM. Holland (2010), ‘Benign partner or benign master? Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations between the EU and the Pacific Islands’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 15(3), 347-66. Shen, Y. and N. Balaban (1999), ‘Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse’, Discourse Processes, 28(2), 139-53. Silverstein, В. and C. Flamenbaum (1989),
‘Biases in the perception and cognition of the actions of enemies’, Journal ofSocial Issues, 45(2), 51-72. Sjursen, H. (2006), ‘What kind of power? European foreign policy in perspective’, Journal ofEuropean Public Policy, 13(2), 169-81. Skinner, Q. (2002), Visions of Politics, Volume 1: Regarding Method, New York: Cambridge University Press. Smith, H. (2002), European Union Foreign Policy: What It Is and What It Does, London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. Steen, G. (2013), ‘When is metaphor deliberate?’, in N-L. Johannesson and D. Minugh (eds), Selected Papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival, Stockholm: Stockholm University Press, pp. 47-63. Stein, J.G. (2013), ‘Threat perception in international relations’, in L. Huddy, D.O. Sears and J.S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 364—94. Stöckl, H. (2010), ‘Metaphor revisited: Cognitive conceptual versus traditional linguis tic perspectives’, AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 35(2), 189-207. Stumbaum, M-В., G. Mohan, О. Gippner, J. Zhao and A. Lutz (2015), ‘Does Europe matter? EU as a security actor in the Asian century’, NFG Final Report, 18, FU Berlin, accessed 21 June 2020 at https://refiibium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/ fubl88/18922/NFG_fmal_report_15111 l.pdf?sequence=l isAllowed=y Suchman, M.C. (1995), ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy ofManagement Review, 20(3), 571-610. Svensson, I. (2009), ‘Who brings which peace? Neutral versus biased mediation and institutional peace arrangements in civil
wars’, Journal ofConflict Resolution, 53(3), 446-69.
References 201 Taylor, S.E. and S.T. Fiske (1975), ‘Point of view and perceptions of causality’, Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439-45. Techau, J. (2020), ‘Saving Europe from corona’s nasty geopolitics’, EUobserver, 15 April, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://euobserver.com/opinion/148057 Teles Fazendeiro, В. (2016), ‘Rethinking roles: Reflexive role ascription and performativity in international relations’, International Studies Review, 18(3), 487-507. The Guardian (2020), ‘The Guardian view on Europe after Brexit: unity is strength’, 18 February, accessed 21 June 2020 at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2020/feb/18/the-guardian-view-on-europe-after-brexit-unity-is-strength The Guardian (2021), ‘The Observer view on the dangers of vaccine nationalism’, 21 March, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2021/mar/21/the-observer-view-on-the-dangers-of-vaccine-nationalism Thies, C. (2012), ‘International socialization processes vs. Israeli national role con ceptions: Can role theory integrate IR theory and foreign policy analysis?’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 25—46. Thies, C. and M. Breuning (2012), ‘Integrating foreign policy analysis and international relations through role theory’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 1^4. Thomas, D.C. (2012), ‘Still punching below its weight? Coherence and effectiveness in European Union foreign policy’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 50(3), 457-74. Toje, A. (2010), The European Union as a Small Power, London: Paigrave Macmillan. Touval, S. (1975), ‘Biased intermediaries:
Theoretical and historical considerations’, Jerusalem Journal ofInternational Affairs, 1, 51-69. Touval, S. and I.W. Zartman (eds) (1985), International Mediation in Theory and Practice, Boulder, CO: Westview. Tsuruoka, M. (2006), ‘How external perspectives of the European Union are shaped: Endogenous and exogenous sources’, paper prepared for the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Fukuoka, Japan. Tsuruoka, M. (2008), “‘Expectations deficit” in EU-Japan relations: Why EU-Japan partnership cannot flourish’, Current Politics and Economics ofAsia, 17(1), 107-26. Umland, A. (2019), ‘The Zelensky enigma: A different kind of populist’, European Council on Foreign Relations, accessed November 30, 2020, at https://ecfr.eu/ article/commentary_zelensky_enigma_ukraine_election_president/ Underdal, A. (1994), ‘Leadership theory: Rediscovering the arts of management’, in I.W. Zartmann (ed.), International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management ofComplexity, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 178-97. Wallensteen, P. and I. Svensson (2014), ‘Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflicts’, Journal ofPeace Research, 51(2), 315-27. Watson, A. (1982), Diplomacy: The Dialogue between States, London: Routledge. White, R. (1968), Nobody Wanted War: Misperception in Vietnam and Other Wars, Garden City: Doubleday. Whitman, R. (2005), ‘Winning hearts and minds for Europe’, in R. Youngs (ed.), GLOBAL EUROPE Report 2: New Terms of Engagement, The Foreign Policy Centre/The British Council/The European Commission, in association
with Wilton Park, pp. 30-37. Whitman, R. (2011), Normative Powers Europe: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives, London: Routledge. Whitman, R. (2019), ‘The future(s) of the EU foreign policy studies’, Presentation at the workshop External projection - International roles and responsibilities, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 18 January.
202 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles World Health Organisation (WHO) (2021), WHO Coronavirus (CO VID-19) Dashboard, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://covidl9.who.int/table Wright, M. (2009), Gower Handbook of Internal Communication, London: Taylor Francis Group. Young, O. (1967), The Intermediaries. Third Parties in International Crises, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Zartman, I.W. (1994), ‘Two’s company and more’s a crowd. The complexities of mul tilateral negotiation’, in I.W. Zartman (ed.), International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 178-97. Zartman, I.W. (2008), ‘Introduction bias, pre-negotiation and leverage in mediation’, International Negotiation, 13(3), 305-10. Zashin, E. and P. Chapman (1974), ‘The use of metaphor and analogy: Towards a renewal of political language’, The Journal ofPolitics, 36(2), 290-326. Zhabotynskaya, S. (2013a), ‘Konceptual naya metafora v special nom yazyke: proce dura analiza’ [Conceptual metaphor in a language for specific purposes]. Inostrannye yazyki v vysshej shkole (Ryazanskij gos. un-է imeni S.A. Esenina). Foreign lan guages in a higher school, S. Yesenin Ryazan State University, Russia, 3 (26), 24—32 (in Russian). Zhabotynskaya, S. (2013b), ‘Konceptual naya metafora: kongruehntnoe і nekongruehntnoe kartirovanie vo mnozhestvennyh dannyh’ [Conceptual metaphor: con gruent and incongruent mapping in multiple data], in A.N. Rudyakov (ed.). Funkcional naya lingvistika. Functional Linguistics, 5, 104-106 (in Russian).
Zhabotynskaya, S. (2016), ‘Kontseptualnyie metafory v rechah Baraka Obamy і Vladimira Putina (2014—2015)’ [Conceptual metaphors in the public speeches of Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin (2014—2015)]. (In Russian). Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 13, 43-91. Zhabotynska, S. (2018), ‘Images of Ukraine-EU relations in conceptual metaphors of Ukrainian mass media’, Cognition, Communication, Discourse. Special issue ‘Ukraine-EURelations: Verbal Narratives, Images, and Perceptions, 17, 118—40. Zhabotynska, S. and V. Velivchenko (2018), ‘New media and strategic narratives: The Dutch referendum on Ukraine - EU Association Agreement in Ukrainian and Russian internet blogs’, European Security, 28(3), 360-81. Zhang, L. (2015), ‘Reflexive expectations’ in EU-China relations: A media analysis approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 463-79. Zielonka, J. (2014), Is the EU Doomed?, Cambridge: Polity Press. Zyla, B. (2020), ‘Middle-power internationalism in-between European “paradise” and American “power”? Canada’s political role in an age of Trumpism and Brexit’, Australian and New Zealand Journal ofEuropean Studies, 11(3), 63-77.
Index AA (Association Agreement) 1, 79, 103, 122, 150, 185 ACP (Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific) 24 political 8, 10, 37, 49, 182 studies 8 comparative analysis 17, 37, 44, 49, 142 conceptual metaphor 8, 16, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 62, 70, 74, 87, 107-8, 109-11,116, 136, 182 conceptual metaphor theory 3, 4, 15, 16, 19, 26, 30-33, 35, 36, 45, 164, 180 Constitutional Treaty (2008) 10,11, 34 context-specific roles 20, 22 Copenhagen Conference of the Parties (2009) 11,24 Covid-19 15, 54, 80, 183, 184 credibility 9, 17, 25, 55, 99, 100, 101, 106, 118,119,155,163 cultural diplomacy 17, 47, 57, 125. 126, 134,138, 144 bilateral partner 43, 45, 46, 47, 79-98, 145, 150-52,162, 169, 172, 173, 175, 177, 181 bilateral trade 80 Borrell, Josep 2, 4 Brexit 12, 13, 14, 34, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59, 61, 70, 76, 149 capability-expectations gap 8, 23, 47, 81,82 capable ally 56, 76, 161 cascading activation framing theory 10, 14 case-specific conceptual templates 47 China 4, 11, 12, 13,39, 146, 149 chronological coherence 25-6 coding interviews global 44,45 latent 44, 45 manifest 44—5 cognitive approach 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 26, 30, 32 cognitive consistency 23, 25 cognitive linguistics 3, 6, 15, 31, 37, 46, 180 cognitive mental mapping 34 coherence 25-6, 55, 76, 99, 100, 106, 156 cohorts 5, 33, 40, 41, 44, 49, 93, 108, 113, 129,160 collaborative diplomacy 124, 144 common market 51 communication 15, 17, 42, 53, 79, 120, 123, 124,127,128,139, 158, 159, 172 changing landscape 9, 10 data analysis 37, 43-8 data collection 37, 40-43 Disaggregating EU Perceptions in China (2009-12) 39 EaP (Eastern Partnership)
1, 2, 79, 99, 152, 182 EEAS (European External Action Service) 1, 41, 160 emotions 3, 5, 12, 29-30, 32, 39, 52, 76, 107, 118,165,182 ENP (European Neighbourhood Policy) 79, 99, 103 Erasmus+ 41, 80,133,134, 136,140 ESS (European Security Strategy) 7,12 EU (European Union) behaviour 4, 16, 24, 82 as a bilateral partner 79-98, 150-52, 162, 169, 172, 173, 175, 177, 181 Brexit 12,13, 14, 34, 54, 55, 58, 59, 61, 70, 76, 149 203
204 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles coherence 76, 99, 100, 106 comparative studies 2, 41 constitution 115 diplomatic relations with Ukraine 122—44 disunity 58, 73, 75 as an economic power 11, 77, 102, 145 EU-Ukraine relations 33, 41, 47, 52, 55, 60, 61, 77, 79, 80-82, 85, 87, 96--7, 105, 119, 123, 147, 152,160, 178, 170, 183 external action 15, 16, 40, 75, 99, 123, 125 external expectations of 81, 82, 83, 84, 97 external partners 3, 4, 9,11, 51, 53, 55, 81, 82,183 external perceptions of 5, 6-16, 19, 20,24, 33, 52, 54, 56-61, 75, 97 external perceptions see external perceptions of the EU financial crisis 10, 11, 13, 38, 46, 47, 53, 54, 61, 70,148, 183 foreign policy 1, 2, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 26, 33-5, 36, 59, 102, 181,182,183, 184 as a global actor 13, 14, 15, 59, 81 as a global leader 50, 52, 54, 57, 58, 68, 71, 74, 75, 145-9 Global Perceptions project 8, 10, 37,38 as a global power 50, 52, 54, 56, 68, 71, 74, 75, 145-9 Global Strategy (2016) 1, 4, 12,13, 14,125, 152, 183 images of see images of the EU interest in Ukraine 72, 73, 76, 80, 83, 92, 94, 97 internal divides 9, 11 international identity 7, 8, 9 leadership 14, 24, 57, 62, 71, 75, 146, 161, 169, 183 mediation in Russia-Ukraine conflict 102-7 as a mediator 17, 45, 46, 99-121, 153-6, 163, 168, 170, 171, 172, 173 migration crisis 54, 58, 59, 60, 61, 67, 70, 76, 148, 171 perceived attractiveness of 55, 60 policy 3, 24, 82, 87, 122,176,177, 178 power and leadership 51, 56, 62, 68, 71, 75, 149,182 as a public diplomacy actor 17, 45, 46,47, 47, 122-44, 145, 156-9, 160, 163-4, 165, 170, 174
reaction to Ukraine crisis 53 reputation 10, 53, 54, 74, 76,106, 143, 148 role performance 4,16, 24, 82, 97, 181 roles 4, 16, 17, 24, 37, 75, 82, 97, 126, 162, 165, 170, 181 sanctions against Russia 80, 99, 102, 103, 104, 107, 113, 136, 153, 155. 156, 163, 173 self-image 7, 13, 38, 41, 49, 142, 145, 162, 168, 169, 170, 174, 175, 181 self-perception 4, 17, 24, 35, 82, 145-59, 173,176,181 studies 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 31, 33-5, 49, 181, 182 weakening of 60, 61, 67 Euro 7, 9, 34 Eurobarometer survey 13 EuroBroadMap project 39 Euromaidan 84, 97 European disintegration 54 European integration 1,7, 11, 39, 53, 54, 60, 65, 72, 74, 81, 91,127,129, 175 Eurozone debt crisis 10, 11,13, 38,46, 47, 53, 54, 61, 70, 148, 183 EU-Ukraine summit (2019) 79 EU-Ukraine trade 80 exchange diplomacy 125,126 expectation gaps 82-6, 97 expectation-performance gap 4, 16, 24, 36, 82, 83, 97, 98, 160, 176, 178, 181 expectations deficit 23, 81, 83, 97 external credibility 25 external perceiver 33, 34, 35, 38
205 Index external perceptions of the EU 3, 4, 5, 6-16, 19, 24, 33^1, 37,41,42, 45, 51, 52, 73, 74, 75, 181 comparing 5, 17,49, 160-79, 182 contextual nature of 57 first wave (early 2000s-2009) 7-9, 37-8 as a global leader 53, 75, 160-62 as a global power 53, 160-62 as a mediator 99,100,163—4 as a public diplomacy actor 17, 123, 124-6, 142, 144 second wave (2009-16) 9-12, 38-9 studies 37-40, 58 third wave (2016-present) 12-16, 40 Ukraine 4, 10, 14, 39, 43, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56-61,82, 97, 100, 118, 123,126, 131,169, 170, 185 External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor (2006-07) 8 foreign policy 3, 4, 6, 21, 34, 81, 147 actor 2, 4, 19, 20, 81 analysis 6, 16, 22, 26, 180 behaviour 21 coherence 100 conduct 4, 6, 7 decisions 26, 55 effectiveness 59 EU 1,2, 8, 10, 12, 14-17, 19,21, 26, 33-6, 59, 102, 181, 1824, 21, 59 perceptions of 19,20 perceptual approach 33-6 priorities 34 roles 16, 21, 36 studies 2, 3, 5, 7, 8,16, 18, 26, 30, 31, 33,183 Ukraine 1 FPI (Service for Foreign Policy Instruments) 125 hope-performance gap 4, 17, 179, 180, 181, 183 horizontal coherence 25-6 image theory 3,12,15, 19, 26-30, 31, 96, 97 image types 55,96, 97, 118,177 images of the EU 2, 5, 33, 34, 39, 47, 48, 50, 52, 53, 62, 77, 175 contrasting 74,120, 140, 169 external 13, 37,38, 181, 184 as a leader 177 metaphorical 165 negative 11,14, 73, 141,143,149, 168, 169 as a partner 183 positive 93, 94,120 self-image 7, 13, 38, 41, 49, 142, 145, 162, 168, 169, 170, 174, 175,181 Ukrainian 49, 76,172, 181 Images of the EU as an international negotiator in multilateral settings (2007/2010) 8, 37
impartiality 17, 99,100, 101,102,106, 120, 163 implementation coherence 25-6 incoherence 26, 106, 119, 149, 161 input legitimacy 25 IR (International Relations) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,9, 17,27,50,55, 124, 181 ‘cognitive turn’ 3, 8, 26,180 and foreign policy study 3, 5, 6, 8, 17, 18, 22, 26,31,32, 33, 180 images and perceptions 6, 17,19, 26, 27, 49, 180, 182 images/image theory 26, 27, 28, 31, 36, 164, 180 metaphor 31 and regional studies 4, 181 roles/role theory 3, 20, 21, 27,28, 32, 36,49, 180 studies 9,18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 182 great power 20, 23, 46, 50, 51, 56, 57, 68, 71, 73, 75, 145-9, 153, 160-62 Guardian 12, 15 Kyiv 1,41, 104, 122, 128 Kyoto protocol 24 ‘history-making events’ 29, 35, 36, 52 leadership 5, 20, 47, 50, 171, 177, 178
206 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles definition 51-2 directional 50, 52, 57, 75 EU 14, 24, 57,62, 71,75, 146, 161, 169,183 instrumental 52 lack of 58 normative 146 power and 16, 50, 51, 56-8, 62, 68, 71, 74, 75, 149, 182 roles 50, 52, 57, 146, 161 structural 50, 52, 57 Ukraine 1, 183 legitimacy 8, 9, 17, 19, 25-6, 55, 60, 76 linguistic metaphor 30, 42, 62, 70, 72, 138,139, 140, 170 Lisbon Treaty (2009) 10, 11, 34, 122, 125 ‘logic of appropriateness’ 19 Maidan 1, 2, 14, 56, 79, 84, 97, 102, 175 media 6, 9, 11,13, 37, 38, 39, 40. 60, 84, 86, 137 Ukrainian 14, 127, 128 mediation effectiveness 17, 47, 100-102, 119, 120 metaphor analysis 44, 119, 120, 162. 164,173, 182 cognitive element 169-70 emotive element 165-9, 166, 167 EU as a bilateral partner 87-97, 88-91 EU as a mediator 107-118, 109-11 EU as a power and leader 62-75, 63-6 EU as a public diplomacy actor 135^11, 136-7 normative element 175-6 metaphors of body and capacity 62, 67, 68, 145,157, 168, 170-71 comparing metaphors 75-7, 164-76, 167 conceptual 8, 16, 30-32, 44, 45, 48, 62, 70. 74. 87, 107, 108, 109-11, 116, 136-7, 139, 147, 149,165, 181 conceptual metaphor theory 3, 4, 15, 16, 19, 26, 30-33, 35, 36, 45, 164, 180 congruent 62 deliberate 45 of family and authority 72-4, 94-6, 108, 145, 147, 150, 151,168, 172-3 of games/sports 62, 66,107, 109, 153, 154 of growth 107, 108,110,115-16, 118, 147, 154,168 of health 62, 67, 87, 91, 147, 148 linguistic 30, 42, 62, 70, 72, 138, 139,140,170 of movement and space 71-2, 116, 146, 148,154, 171-2 negative 96, 116,149, 165,168, 170, 173 non-deliberate 45 of partners
in relations 108, 112-15, 135,137-40, 150, 153, 156, 165, 168,169,173-4 personification 62, 72, 73, 87, 94, 107, 108,135,139,143, 149, 156,157, 175 positive 96, 159, 168 of pressure 117-18,173 of romantic relations 87, 88, 92—4, 96, 97 of stability, structure, substance, and mechanism 68-71, 117, 147, 155, 168,171 of visibility and focus 140-41 of warfare 87, 107, 110 meta-roles 20, 22 methodology 16, 37-49 migration 38, 48, 58, 59, 60, 147, 161 crisis 46, 54, 59, 60, 61, 67, 70, 76, 148, 171 irregular 13, 54 Minsk II peace talks 46, 103, 119, 123, 153, 172, 185 modes of interactions 126-35 collaboration mode 124, 132-5, 142 dialogue mode 124, 129-32. 135, 142 monologue mode 124, 126-9, 135, 142 moral power 20 multiple stakeholders 9,123, 124 multipolar 7, 9, 12, 33
Index NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) 1, 57, 102, 125, 127, 185 ‘new’ public diplomacy 123-4, 143 non-traditional security threats 12 normative legitimacy 25 normative power 20, 38, 50, 56,145, 149, 160 Normative Power Europe 8, 10 no-visa entry 80, 139 OHCHR (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) 4 Otherness 4, 15, 18, 21, 24, 82, 181, 185 Others 4, 9, 17, 19, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 82,169,176,180, 181 outcome partiality 101, 107, 120 output legitimacy 25 ‘outside-in’ perspective 16, 183 perceived capability 55, 58, 97 perceived credibility 101 perceived incoherence 26, 119, 177 perceived power 5, 76,180 perceived status 28, 55, 60 perceived threat 27, 28, 34, 36, 55, 59, 61,76 perception gap 4, 16,17, 24, 25, 36, 47, 82, 142, 160, 169, 170, 173-8, 180, 181, 183 perceptions of effectiveness 99, 100, 120 ‘perceptual inferential scheme’ 26, 27 personification metaphor 62, 72, 73, 87, 94,107,108, 135, 139, 143,149, 156, 157, 175 populism 12, 46, 54, 59, 60, 61, 63, 67, 69, 70,74, 76, 147, 148, 161, 171, 184, 185 power commercial 145 definition 51 economic 11, 50, 56, 77,102, 145 great 20, 23, 46, 50,51,56, 57, 68, 71, 73, 75,145-9, 153, 160-62 hard power 51, 69, 71,102, 160 judgement 50 207 and leadership 16, 50, 51, 56-8, 62, 68, 71, 74, 75,149, 182 middle 20, 38 moral 20 normative 20, 38, 50, 56, 145, 149, 160 perceptions 23, 36, 56, 76. 180 positions 50, 53 soft power 7, 8, 9, 25, 51, 56, 57, 69, 75, 125, 143,145,146,160 processual partiality 101 public diplomacy 10, 11,16-17, 45, 46, 47, 112,120, 122^15, 156-9, 160, 163^1, 165,174, 176-8,
181-3 reflexive expectations 23-5, 81, 97 relational partiality 101, 106,120 research design 7, 37, 38, 41,42, 44,49 Revolution of Dignity 1, 79, 83, 122,123 role model 10, 50, 52 role theory 3, 5, 6, 8,16, 19-36, 82,180, agency and structure 22-3, 35 context-specific roles 20, 22 metaphors 30-33 meta-roles 20, 22 origin 19 role change 19, 23, 29, 30, 35,176 role conception 2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27,28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 40, 44, 152, 162, 176, 181 role conflict 22, 23, 160,176-9, 180 role dynamics 27, 28 role incongruence 17, 22, 23-5, 33, 160,176-9, 180 role perceptions 16, 17, 45, 49, 160-64, 165, 169 role performance 4,16, 22, 24, 26, 82, 83, 85, 97, 99, 100, 104-7,156, 159, 160,163, 164, 178, 181, 183 role prescriptions 19, 21, 27, 28, 35, 36, 37, 40, 162, 176, 180 role set 22, 23, 176 Russia 12, 13, 61, 81,105, 106, 109-11, 112, 116, 117, 119, 120, 134, 135, 184, 185 annexation of Crimea 12, 53, 80, 97, 102 attempts to undermine EU 67, 68, 69, 87, 129
208 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles EU sanctions against 80, 99, 102, 103, 104, 107, 113, 136,153, 155, 156, 163, 173 Minsk II peace talks 46, 103, 119, 123, 153, 172, 185 perceptions of 34 Russia-Ukraine conflict 4, 12, 15, 17,41,46,51,76,80, 99, 100, 102-7, 115, 127, 145, 171 schema 8, 27, 28, 37 Schengen Zone 7, 9, 80, 115, 139, 184, 185 scope conditions 29 September 11 attacks (2001) 7, 10 social identity theory 8, 34 socio-cultural knowledge 31 soft power 7, 8, 9, 25, 51, 56, 57, 69, 75, 125, 143, 145, 146, 160 traditional diplomacy 16, 123, 183 Trump, President Donald 12, 14 Tusk, President Donald 79 Ukraine annexation of Crimea 12, 53, 80, 97, 102 citizens 1, 80, 139, 184, 185 constitution 1, 56, 81 diplomatic relations with EU 122 EU interest in 72, 73, 76, 80, 83, 84 EU relations with 33, 41, 47, 52, 55, 60, 61, 77, 79-82, 85, 87, 96, 97, 105, 119, 123, 147, 152, 160,178, 170, 183 EU support 80, 81, 99, 103,104, 127 ‘European choice’ 53, 56, 60, 76, 81,97, 123,129, 161,184 foreign policy 1 leadership 1, 183 media 14, 127,128 Minsk II peace talks 46, 103, 119, 123, 153,172,185 parliament 1 as a partner 85, 93, 96 perception of EU 10, 14, 39, 51, 53, 54, 56-61, 75, 84, 86, 94, 95, 100, 127 perspectives on EU as a mediator 104-7 post-Maidan 2, 14, 56, 79, 84 reform 79, 80, 81, 86, 95, 96, 97, 133 Revolution of Dignity 1, 79, 83, 122,123 Russia-Ukraine conflict 4, 12, 15, 17,41,46,51,76, 80, 99, 100,102-7,127, 145, 171 social research 10, 39 threats to 61, 82, 132, 135,142 Ukraine-Brussels dialogue 61 Ukraine-UK dialogue 61 UN Climate Change conferences
11 weak ally 56, 76-7 Yanukovych, President Viktor 1 youth opinion 39 Zelensky, President Volodymyr 184,185 Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München J
|
| adam_txt |
Contents List of tables Acknowledgements vi vii 1 Introduction 2 Theoretical innovations: synergizing role theory with insights from image and perception studies 19 3 Methodology 37 4 The EU as a global and regional power and leader 50 5 The EU as a bilateral partner 79 6 The EU as a mediator (with Michèle Knodt) 99 7 The EU as a public diplomacy actor 122 8 EU self-perceptions and images of its roles 145 9 Comparing perceptions of the EU 160 10 Conclusions: filling gaps in knowledge by theoretical synergy 180 References Index 1 187 203
References Aberbach, A., J. Chesney and В. Rockman (1975), ‘Exploring elite political attitudes: Some methodological lessons’, Political methodology, 2(1), 1-27. Aberbach, A. and B. Rockman (2002), ‘Conducting and coding elite interviews’, Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 673-76. Aggestam, K., A. Bergman Rosamond and A. Kronsell (2019), ‘Theorising feminist foreign policy’, Journal ofInternational Relations, 33(1), 23-39, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://doi.Org/10.l 177/0047117818811892 Aggestam, L. (2006), ‘Role theory and European foreign policy: A framework of analysis’, in O. Elgström and M. Smith (eds), The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 11-29. Aggestam, L. (2015), ‘Transformative power or political dwarf? European leadership and global imbalances’, in A. Bakardieva Engelbrekt, M. Mårtensson, L. Oxelheim and T. Persson (eds), The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 16-34. Alexander, M.G., M.B. Brewer and R.W. Livingstone (2005a), ‘Putting stereotype content in context: Image theory and interethnic stereotypes’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 781-94. Alexander, M.G., S. Levin and P.J. Henry (2005b), ‘Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images’, Political Psychology, 26(1), 27-45. Amadio Viceré, M.G. (2020), ‘The cases of Kosovo and Ukraine suggest a fragmented EU foreign policy’, Future of Europe blog, 8 October, accessed 30 October 2020
at http://fijtureofeurope.ideasoneurope.eu/2020/10/08/amadio-eu-foreign-policy -kosovo-ukraine/ Averre, D. and K. Wolczuk (eds) (2016), ‘The Ukrainian crisis and the post-post-Cold War Europe’, Europe-Asia Studies, Special Issue, 68(4), 551-55. Babenko, V, Y. Biletaka and H. Pelyak (2020), ‘Ukraine-EU: Economic integration strategy’, Geopolitics under Globalization, 3(1), 12-23. Bachmann, V. and M. Müller (eds) (2015), Looking in from the Outside: Perceptions of the EU in Eastern Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Bäckstrand, К. and O. Elgström (2013), ‘The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: From leader to “leadiator”’, Journal ofEuropean Public Policy, 20(10), 1369-86. Bain, J. andN. Chaban (2017), ‘Emerging EU strategic narrative?: Twitter dialogues on the EU’s sustainable energy week’, Comparative European Politics, 15(1), 135-55. Bain, J., N. Chaban and S. Kelly (2012), ‘Crumbling giant, rising dragon?: Chinese news media cartoon reflections on the Eurozone debt crisis’, Communication, Politics and Culture, 45(2), 217-39. Barbé, E., A. Herranz-Surrales and M. Natorski (2014), ‘Model, player or instrument for global governance: Metaphors in the discourse and practice of EU foreign policy’, in C. Carta and F. Morin (eds), EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of 187
188 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity, Famham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 111-30. Beardsley, K. (2009), ‘Intervention without leverage: Explaining the prevalence of weak mediators’, International Interactions, 35(3), 272-97. Bengtsson, R. and O. Elgström (2012), ‘Conflicting role conceptions? The European Union in global politics’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 93-108. Bergmann, J., T. Haastrup, A. Niemann and R. Whitman (eds) (2018), Special Issue ‘The European Union as international mediator’, International Negotiations, 23(2), 157-76. Bergmann, J. and A. Niemann (2015), ‘Mediating international conflicts: The European Union as an effective peacemaker?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5), 957-75. Berry, J. (2002), ‘Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing’, Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679-82. Bickerton, C. (2011), European Union Foreign Policy. From Effectiveness to Functionality, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Biddle, B.J. and E.J. Thomas (eds) (1966), Role Theory: Expectations, Identities and Behaviors, New York: John Wiley Sons. Björkdahl, A., N. Chaban, J. Leslie and A. Masselot (eds) (2015), Importing EU norms? Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht: Springer. Björkdahl, A. and O. Elgström (2015), ‘The EPA-negotiations: A channel for norm export and import?’, in A. Björkdahl, N. Chaban, J. Leslie and A. Masselot (eds), Importing EU Norms? Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht: Springer, pp.
133-52. Blunder, J., J. McLeod and K. Rosengren (1992), ‘An introduction to comparative communication research’, in J. Blunder, J. McLeod and K. Rosengren (eds), Comparatively Speaking: Communication and Culture across Space and Time, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 3-18. Bobritskij, D. and M. Shashkova (2020), ‘Год Зеленского. Победы и поражения действующего президента’, Novoe Vremya, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://nv.ua/ ukraine/politics/vladimir-zelenskiy-god-na-pozicii-prezidenta-ukrainy-dostizhenie-i -provaly-novosti-ukrainy-50083394.html Borrell, J. (2020), ‘Embracing Europe’s power’, Project Syndicate, 8 February, accessed 21 June 2020 at https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/embracing -europe-s-power-by-josep-borrell-2020-02?barrier=accesspaylog Boulding, K.E. (1956), The Image, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Boulding, K.E. (1959), ‘National images and international systems’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), 120-31. Brader, T. and G.E. Marcus (2013), ‘Emotion and political psychology’, in L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 165-204. Braudel, F. (1958), ‘Histoire et Sciences sociales: La longue durée’, Annales, 13(4), 725-53. Braudel, F. (1982), On History (S. Matthews, trans.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1969). C3EU (n.d.), ‘Crisis, conflict and critical diplomacy: EU perceptions in Ukraine, Israel and Palestine’, accessed 21 October 2019 at https://jeanmonnet.nz/c3eu/ Carey, S. (2002), ‘Undivided loyalties: Is national
identity an obstacle to European integration?’, European Union Politics, 3(4), 387-413.
References 189 Carnevale, P. and S. Arad (1996), ‘Bias and impartiality in international mediation’, in J. Bercovitch (ed.), Resolving International Conflicts. The Theory and Practice of Negotiation, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 39-53. Carta, C. (2014), ‘From the “magnificent castle” to the brutish state of nature: Use of metaphor and the analysis of the EU’s international discourse’, in C. Carta and F. Morin (eds), EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense ofDiversity, Famham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 191-207. Castano. E., S. Sacchi and P. Gries (2003), ‘The perceptions of the Other in inter national relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity’, Political Psychology, 24(3), 449-68. Cercas, J. (2020), ‘The EU was created to keep nationalism in check. Coronavirus is a dangerous test’, The Guardian, 15 April, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://www .theguardian.com/books/2020/apr/15/the-eu-was-created-to-keep-nationalism-in -check-coronavirus-is-a-dangerous-test?CMP=share_btn_link Chaban, N. (2020), ‘Perceptions, expectations, motivations: Evolution of Canadian views on the EU’, Australian and New Zealand Journal ofEuropean Studies, 11(3), 45-62. Chaban, N. and A. Chaban (2018), ‘Communicating Europe beyond its borders: Imagining the EU in Ukraine post-Maidan’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 23(1/1), 119-38. Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2018a), ‘Constructing bridges and fostering growth: Interdisciplinary insights into European Union role conceptions and prescriptions’, Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 2018(17), 24-36.
Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2018b), On a journey with uncertain destination. Metaphors and images of the European Union in Russian and Ukrainian media after Brexit vote’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 23(1/1), 159-76. Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2020), ‘A perceptual approach to EU public diplomacy: Investigating collaborative diplomacy in EU-Ukraine relations’, The Hague Journal ofDiplomacy, 15(4), 488-516. Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2021a), ‘Politicization of EU development policy: The role of EU external perceptions (case of Ukraine)’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(1), first online https://doi.org/10.llll/jcms.13137 Chaban, N. and O. Elgström (2021b), ‘Theorizing external perceptions of the EU’, in S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz (eds), Studying the EU's External Action: Concepts, Approaches, Theories, London: Macmillan Intemational/Red Globe Press, pp. 265-79. Chaban, N., O. Elgström and O. Gulyaeva (2017a), ‘Russian images of the European Union: Before and after Maidan’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(2), 480-99. Chaban, N., O. Elgström, S. Kelly and L.S. Yi (2013), ‘Images of the EU beyond its borders: Issue-specific and regional perceptions of European Union power and lead ership’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(3), 433-51. Chaban, N. and M. Holland (eds) (2008), The European Union and the Asia-Pacific: Media, Public and Elite Perceptions ofthe EU, London and New York: Routledge. Chaban, N. and M. Holland (eds) (2013), ‘Lisbon and the changing external percep tions of the EU: Visions from the Asia-Pacific’, Baltic Journal ofEuropean Studies, Special Issue,
3(3). Chaban, N. and M. Holland (2014), ‘The evolution of EU perceptions: From single studies to systematic research’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Communicating Europe in Times ofCrisis: External Perceptions ofthe European Union, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 1-23.
190 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Chaban, N. and M. Holland (2015), ‘EU external perceptions: From innovation to an established field of study’, in A. Kalland Aarstad, E. Drieskens, K.E. Jørgensen, К. Laatikainen and В. Tonra (eds), Handbook of European Foreign Policy, London: Sage, pp. 672-86. Chaban N. and M. Holland (2018), ‘Introduction: Partners and perceptions’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Shaping the EU’s Global Strategy: Partners and Perceptions, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 1-26. Chaban, N., M. Holland and P. Ryan (eds) (2009), The EU through the Eyes ofAsia: New Cases, New Findings, Singapore and London: World Scientific. Chaban, N. and S. Kelly (2017), ‘Tracing the evolution of EU images using a case-study ofAustralia and New Zealand ’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 55(4), 691-708. Chaban, N., S. Kelly and J. Bain (2014), ‘En‘vision’ing Europe’s Crisis: A visual and textual analysis of the EU imagery in Chinese, Indian and Russian business newspa pers’, Journal ofInternational Communication, 20(1), 1-20. Chaban, N., S. Kelly and A. Rayroux (2018a), ‘Communicating the EU externally: Media framing of the EU’s irregular migration crisis (case-studies of New Zealand and Canada)’, in R. Bengtsson and M. Rosén Sundström (eds), The EU and the Emerging Global Order: Essays in Honour ofOle Elgström, Lund: Lund University, pp. 197-222. Chaban, N. and M. Knodt (2020), ‘Perceptions of the EU in Ukraine after “Brexit” referendum: Images of capabilities and opportunities’, in N. Chaban, A. Niemann and J. Spreyer (eds), Changing Perceptions of
the EU at Times of Brexit: Global Perspectives, Abington and NY : Routledge, pp. 78-95. Chaban, N., M. Knodt and J. Headley (eds) (2018b), ‘The EU and its eastern neigh bours: Perceptions and strategic dialogue in the region’, European Foreign Affairs Review, Special Issue, 23(1/1). Chaban, N., M. Knodt and A. Verdun (eds) (2017b), ‘External images of the EU energy power across the globe’, Comparative European Politics, Special Issue, 15(1). Chaban, N. and S. Lucarelli (2021), ‘Reassessing external images of the EU: Evolving narratives in times of crisis’, European Foreign Policy Review, 26(1), 177-96. Chaban, N., A. Niemann and J. Speyer (eds) (2020), Changing Perceptions ofthe EU at Times ofBrexit: Global Perspectives, Abington and NY: Routledge. Chaban, N. and B. O’Loughlin (2018), ‘The EU’s crisis diplomacy in Ukraine: The matrix of possibilities’, Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5), accessed 19 June 2020 at https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/eus-crisis-diplomacy-ukraine-matrix -possibilities Chaban, N. and A-M. Magdalena (2014), ‘External perceptions of the EU during the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(2), 195-220. Chaban, N., A. Masselot and K. Vadura (eds) (2015), ‘“Rising” Asia and “Normative Power Europe”: New perspectives in the dialogue on norms and values’, Special Issue, Asia-Europe Journal, 13(3). Chaban, N., A. Miskimmon and B. O’Loughlin (2017c), ‘The EU’s peace and security narrative: Views from EU strategic partners in Asia’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(6). 1273-89. Chaban, N., A. Miskimmon and B. O’Loughlin
(eds) (2019), ‘Understanding the scope and limits of EU diplomacy: Connecting strategic narrative to EU external percep tions research’, European Security, Special Issue, 28(3). Chaban, N., N. Smith and M. Holland (2010), ‘The potential of return migration as a resource for EU public diplomacy efforts: A case-study of New Zealand return
References 191 migrants from the EU’, European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 1(4), 378-98. Chaban, N. and S. Zhabotynska (eds) (2018), ‘Crisis, conflict and critical diplomacy: Communicating the EU in Ukraine’, Cognition, Communication, Discourse, Special Issue, 17. Chalmers, J. and K. Abnett (2021), ‘EU rejects accusations of “vaccine nationalism’”, Reuters, March 10, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.reuters.com/article/us -health-coronavirus-eu-michel-idUSKBN2B 11YM Charteris-Black, J. (2004), Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Cienki, A. and D. Yanow (2013), ‘Linguistic approaches to analyzing policies and the political’, Journal ofInternational Relations and Development, 16(2), 167-310. Cohen, H. (n.d.), ‘What is an image?’, accessed 26 October 2013 at http://aaronshome .com/aaron/publications/whatisanimage.pdf Cooper, A.F., R.A. Higgott and K.R. Nossal (1993), Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order, Vancouver: UBC Press. Cooper, R. (2003), The Breaking of National: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century, London: Atlantic Books. Cottam, M. (1986), Foreign Policy Decision Making, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Cottam, M. and S. Chih-yu (eds) (1992), Contending Dramas. A Cognitive Approach to International Organizations, New York: Praeger. Cottam, R. (1977), Foreign Policy Motivation: A General Theory and a Case Study, Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press. Council of the European Union (2003), European Security Strategy, 8 December, accessed 19 June 2020
at http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15895 -2003-INIT/en/pdf Cowan, G. and A. Arsenault (2008), ‘Moving from monologue to dialogue to collabo ration: The layers of public diplomacy’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10-30. Creswell, J.W. and J.D. Creswell (2018), Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th edition, Los Angeles: Sage. Cull, N.J. (2008), ‘Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories’, The ANNALS of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54. Davis Cross, M. and I. Karolewski (eds) (2017a), ‘Europe’s hybrid foreign policy: The Ukraine-Russia crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Special Issue, 55(1). Davis Cross, M. and I. Karolewski (2017b), ‘What type of power has the EU exercised in the Ukraine-Russia crisis? A framework of analysis’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 55(1), 3-19. de Vreese, C. (2001), ‘Europe in the news. A cross-national comparative study of the new news coverage of key EU events’, European Union Politics, 2(3): 283-307. Dickinson, P. (2021), ‘Putin plots Ukraine peace talks without Ukraine’, Atlantic Council, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ ukrainealert/putin-plots-ukraine-peace-talks-without-ukraine/ Didelon-Loiseau, C. and C. Grasland (2014), ‘Internal and external perceptions of Europe/the EU in the world through mental maps’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Communicating Europe in the Times of Crisis: External Perceptions of the European Union, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 65-94.
Disaggregating Chinese perceptions ofthe EU and the implications for the EU’s China policy, accessed 30 November 2020 at http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/54186_en .html
192 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Dixon, R. and N. Gryvnyak (2020), ‘Ukraine’s Zelensky wants to end a war in the east. His problem: No one agrees how to do it’, Washington Post, 20 March, accessed 1 December 2020 at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/ukraines -zelensky-wants-to-end-a-war-in-the-east-his-problem-no-one-agrees-how-to-do-it/ 2020/03/19/ae653cbc-6399-l Iea-8a8e-5c5336b32760_story.html Dominguez, R. (2018), ‘Strategic partner and model of governance: EU perceptions in Mexico’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Shaping the EU Global Strategy Partners and Perceptions, New York: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 147-64. Dubey, M. (1985), ‘The main forces at work’, in A.S. Lali (ed.), Multilateral Negotiation and Mediation: Instruments and Methods, New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 154-81. Duchêne, F. (1972), ‘Europe’s role in world peace’, in R. Mayne (ed.), Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, London: Fontana, pp. 32-47. Duffy, B. (2018), The Perils ofPerceptions, London: Atlantic Books. Duke, S. (2013), ‘The European external action service and public diplomacy’, Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendaeľ, accessed 8 May 2020 at https://www.eipa.eu/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/11/20131009144127_TheEuropeanExtemalActionService-1 .pdf Dwyer, K. (1982), Moroccan Dialogues: Anthropology in Question, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012), ‘Cosmopolitan politicization? Relating public perceptions of interdependence and expectations in internationalized governance’,
European Journal ofInternational Relations, 18(3), 481-508. EEAS (European External Action Service) (2018), ‘Remarks by High Representative/ Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the joint press point with Mr Volodymyr Groysman, Prime Minister of Ukraine’, 12 March, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/41162/remarks-high -representativevice-president-federica-mogherini-joint-press-point-mr-volodymyr _en EEAS (European External Action Service) (2020), ‘EU-Ukraine relations - factsheet’, 10 June, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters -homepage_en/4081/%20EU-Ukraine%20relations,%20factsheet EEAS (European External Action Service) (n.d.), ‘EU delegations. Ukraine’, accessed 12 April at https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine_en Elgström, О. (2000), Images and Strategies for Autonomy, Dordrecht: Kluwer. Elgström, О. (2006), ‘The Presidency: The role(s) of the Chair in European Union negotiations’, The Hague Journal ofDiplomacy, 1(2), 171-95. Elgström, О. (2007a), ‘The European Union as a leader in international multilateral negotiations ֊ a problematic aspiration?’, International Relations, 21(4), 445-58. Elgström, О. (2007b), Outsiders’ perceptions of the EU in international trade negotia tions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 949-67. Elgström, О. (2008), ‘Images of the EU in EPA negotiations: Angel, demon - or just human?’, European Integration On-line Journal, 12(5), 1-12. Elgström, О. (2014), ‘Leader, bridge-builder or hobbled giant: Perceptions of the EU in climate change
negotiations’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Communicating Europe in the Times ofCrisis: External Perceptions ofthe European Union, London: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 27-44. Elgström, О. (2015), ‘External perceptions ofthe EU : Obstacle or asset in the fight against global imbalances’, in A. Bakardieva Engelbrekt, M. Mårtensson, L. Oxelheim and
References 193 T. Persson (eds), The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 250֊68. Elgström, O., J. Bercovitch and C. Skau (2003), ‘Regional organizations and interna tional mediation: The effectiveness of insider mediators’, African Journal ofConflict Resolution, 3(1), 11-27. Elgström, О. and N. Chaban (2015), ‘To study external perceptions of the EU: A conceptual approach’, in V. Bachmann and M. Miiller (eds), Looking in from the Outside: Perceptions of the EU in Eastern Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 17-33. Elgström, О., N. Chaban, M. Knodt, P. Müller and S. Pardo (2018), ‘Perceptions of the EU’s role in the Ukraine-Russian and the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts: A biased mediator?’, International Negotiation, 23(2), 299-318. Elgström, О. and M. Smith (eds) (2006), The European Union ’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, London: Routledge. Entman, R.M. (1993), ‘Framing: Towards the understanding of the fractured para digm’. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58. Entman, R. M. (2003), ‘Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11’, Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432. EU Global Perceptions (n.d.), https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/ncre/research/ euperceptions/ EU Global Strategy (2016), ‘Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy’, accessed 23 September 2019 at http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs review _web.pdf EUmagine
(n.d.), ‘Imagining Europe from the outside’, project, accessed 19 June 2020 at http://www.eumagine.org/default.aspx EuroBroadMap (n.d.), accessed 19 June 2020 at http://www.eurobroadmap.eu/ EuropeAid (2010), Opinion polling and research in the ENPI countries and territories (OPPOL): Country report on the opinion poll 1, Ukraine’, 127122/C/SER/Multi, accessed at 21 October 2019 http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/documents/ press_releases/ua_report_uk.pdf European Commission (2017), ‘Flash Eurobarometer 450: Future of Europe - views from outside the EU’, report, accessed 20 June 2020 at http://ec.europa.eu/ commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/ 79589 European Commission (2021), ‘EU disburses €600 million in macro-financial assis tance to Ukraine’, 9 December, accessed 11 April 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/ neighbourhood-enlargement/news_comer/news/eu-disburses-%E2%82%AC600 -million-macro-financial-assistance-ukraine_en#:~:text=The%20European %20Commission%2C%20on%20behalf,financial%20assistance%20(MFA) %20programme. text=The%20Commission%20is%20working%20closely,of %20the%20agreed%20policy%20programme European Commission (n.d.), ‘Cultural diplomacy platform’, accessed 8 May 2020 at http://www.cultureinextemalrelations.eu/ European Council (2019), ‘EU-Ukraine summit’, meetings: International summit, Kyiv, Ukraine, 8 July, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ en/meetings/international-summit/2019/07/08/ European Council (n.d.), ‘EU relations with Ukraine’, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://
www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eastem-partnership/ukraine/
194 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner (2002), The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books. Fisher, G. (1997), Mindsets: The Role of Culture and Perception in International Relations, 2nd edition, Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press. Fiske de Gouveia, P. (2005), European Infopolitik: Developing EU Public Diplomacy Strategy, London: Foreign Policy Centre. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2007), ‘Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective’, The Hague Journal ofDiplomacy, 2(3), 187-211. Flanik, W. (2011), ‘Bringing FPA back home: Cognition, constructivism, and concep tual metaphor’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 7, 423—46. Garton Ash, T. (2017), ‘Is Europe disintegrating?’, The New York Review ofBooh, 19 January. Goatly, A. (1997), The Language ofMetaphors, London: Routledge. Goddard, C. (2004), ‘The ethnopragmatism and semantics of “active” metaphors’, Journal ofPragmatics, 36(7), 1211-30. Goldmann, К. (1988), Change and Stability in Foreign Policy, Princeton: Princeton Legacy Library. Goldstein, J. and R.O. Keohane (1993), ‘Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical frame work’, in J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 3-30. Gottlieb, A. (1991), ‘I’ll be with you in a Minute, Mr. Ambassador’: The Education of a Canadian Diplomat in Washington, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Gregory, B. (2008), ‘Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field’, The ANNALS of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social
Science, 616(1), 274-91. Greig, J.M and P.F. Diehl (2016), International Mediation, Cambridge: Polity Press. Grubb, M. and J. Gupta (2000), ‘Leadership. Theory and methodology’, in J. Gupta and M. Grubb (eds), Climate Change and European Leadership: A Sustainable Role for Europe?, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 15-24. Hamati-Ataya, I. (2012), ‘Beyond (post)positivism: The missed promises of systemic pragmatism’, International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 291-305. Harnisch, S. (2011), ‘Role theory: Operationalization of key concepts’, in S. Harnisch, C. Frank and H.W. Maull (eds), Role Theory in International Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 7-15. Hämisch, S. (2012), ‘Conceptualizing in the minefield: Role theory and foreign policy learning’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 47-69. Hämisch, S. (2015), ‘Role theory and the study of Chinese foreign policy’, in S. Hämisch, S. Bersick and J.C. Gottwald (eds), China ’s International Roles, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 3-21. Hämisch, S., C. Frank and H.W. Maull (eds) (2011), Role Theory in International Relations, London: Routledge. Heath, C. and D. Heath (2007), Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Take Hold and Others Come Unstuck, London: Random House. Hermann, M.G. and C.W. Kegley Jr. (1995), ‘Rethinking democracy and international peace: Perspectives from political psychology’, International Studies Quarterly, 39(4), 511-33. Herrmann, R.K. (1984), ‘Perceptions and foreign policy analysis’, in D.A. Sylvan and S. Chan (eds), Foreign Policy Decision Making: Perception, Cognition and Artificial Intelligence, New York: Praeger, pp. 25-52.
Herrmann, R.K. (1985), Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
References 195 Herrmann, R.K. (2013), ‘Perceptions and image theory in international relations’, in L. Huddy, D.O. Sears and J.S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 334—63. Herrmann, R.K. (2021), Concluding remarks. FPA Distinguished Scholar Panel Honoring Richard Herrmann, International Studies Association (ISA) Virtual Convention, 8 April. Herrmann, R.K. and M.P. Fischerkeller (1995), ‘Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: Cognitive-strategic research after the Cold War’, International Organization, 49(3), 415-50. Herrmann, R.K., J.F. Voss, T.Y.E. Schooler and J. Ciarrochi (1997), ‘Images in international relations: An experimental test of cognitive schemata’, International Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 403-33. Hill, C. (1993), ‘The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s interna tional role’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305-28. Hocking, B. (2005), ‘Rethinking the “new” public diplomacy’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The Nev Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 28-46. Hollis, M. and S. Smith (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Holsti, К. (1970), ‘National role conceptions in the study offoreign policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233-309. Hopmann, J.T. (1996), The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Huddy, L., D.O. Sears and J.S. Levy (eds) (2013), The Oxford Handbook of Political
Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press. Hülsse, R. (2006), ‘Imagine the EU: The metaphorical construction of a supranational identity’, Journal ofInternational Relations and Development, 9, 396-421. Hurd, I. (1999), ‘Legitimacy and authority in international politics’, International Organization, 53(2), 379-408. Hyde-Price, A. (2008), ‘A “tragic actor”? A realist perspective on “ethical power Europe’”, International Affairs, 84(1), 29-44. IARPA 2011 (2011), ‘Metaphor program’, Washington DC: Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Isani, M. and B. Schlipphak (2017), ‘The desire for sovereignty - an explanation of EU attitudes in the Arab world’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 55(3), 502-17. Ivashchenko-Stadnik, K., R. Petrov, P. Rieker and A. Russo (2018), ‘Implementation of the EU’s crisis response in Ukraine’, EUNPACK Working Paper, January, accessed 19 June 2020 at http://www.eunpack.eu/sites/default/files/publications/ 2018-01-31 %20D6.3%20W orking%20paper%20on%20implementation%20of %20EU%20crisis%20response%20in%20Ukraine.pdf Jelisié, J. (2012), ‘Developing public diplomacy for supporting EU accession: Lessons to be learned at the Western Balkans’, in M. Andrlić and A. Gustović-Ercegovac (eds), The 13th CEI Dubrovnik Diplomatic Forum Strategic Public Diplomacy, Diplomatic Academy Proceedings 9, pp. 33-54. Jervis, R. (1976), Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jupille, J. and J.A. Caporaso (1998), ‘States, agency, and rules: The European Union in global environmental politics’, in C. Rhodes
(ed.), The European Union in the World Community, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 213-29.
196 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Kanét, R. (2015), ‘The failed Western challenge to Russia’s revival in Eurasia?’, International Politics, 52(5), 503-22. Kelly, S., F. Doser and N. Chaban (2021), ‘Shifting frames: Images of Brexit in NZ and possible consequences’, in K. Haba and M. Holland (eds), Brexit and After, Singapore: Springer, pp. 159-79. Kelman, Herbert C. (1966), International Behavior: A Social Psychological Analysis, New York: Halt, Rinehart and Winston. Kennedy, L. and S. Lucas (2005), ‘Enduring freedom: Public diplomacy and U.S. foreign policy’, American Quarterly, 57(2), 309-33. Keuleers, F. (2017), European Union and Chinese Strategic Narratives towards Africa: A Mixed Methods Study ofReception by African Audiences, PhD Thesis. Keuleers, F., D. Fonck and S. Keukeleire (2016), ‘Beyond EU navel-gazing: Taking stock of EU-centrism in the analysis of EU foreign policy’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(3), 345-64. Kevin, D. (2003), Europe in the Media, London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kilian, В. and О. Elgström (2010), ‘Still a green leader? The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations’, Cooperation and Conflict, 45(3), 255-73. Kleiboer, M. (1998), International Mediation: The Multiple Realities of Third-Party Intervention, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Klose, S. (2018), ‘Theorizing the EU’s actomess: Towards an interactionist role theory framework’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(5), 1144-60. Klose, S. (2019), ‘The emergence and evolution of an external actor’s regional role: An interactionist role theory perspective’, Cooperation
and Conflict, 54(3), 426-41. Knodt, M, N. Chaban and L. Nielsen (2017), Bilateral Energy Relations between the EU and Emerging Powers: Mutual Perception of the EU and Brazil, China, India and South Africa, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Korski, D. (2008), ‘Making Europe’s voice louder’, European Council on Foreign Relations, accessed 7 December 2013 at www.ecfr.eu/content/entry/commentary _making_europes_voice_louder Kövecses, Z. (2000), ‘The scope of metaphor’, in A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 79-92. Kövecses, Z. (2002), Metaphor. A Practical Introduction, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Krastev, I. (2017), After Europe, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Krippendorf, К. (1980), Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, Beverly Hills: Sage. Kübler-Ross, E. (1973), On Death and Dying, Oxfordshire: Taylor Francis. Kuzio, T. (2015a), Ukraine. Democratization, Corruption and the New Russian Imperialism, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Kuzio, T. (2015b), ‘Why Russia should be added to the state sponsors of terrorism list’, Foreign Affairs, 25 January, accessed 19 June 2020 https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/russian-federation/2015-01-25/ukraine-reignites Kuzio, T. (2017), ‘Ukraine between a constrained EU and assertive Russia’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 103-20. Kydd, A. (2003), ‘Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation’, American Journal ofPolitical Science, 47(4), 597-611. Lakoff, G. (1991), ‘Metaphor and war: the metaphor system used
to justify war in the gulf, Peace Research, 23(2/3), 25-32.
References 197 Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Larsen, H. (2014), ‘The EU as a normative power and the research on external percep tions: The missing link’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 896-910. Larson, D.W. (1985), Origins ofContainment: A Psychological Explanation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Leech, B.L. (2002), ‘Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews’, Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665-68. Lending, M. (2000), Change and Renewal: Norwegian Foreign Cultural Policy 2001-2005, Oslo: Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Lucarelli, S. (ed.) (2007), ‘Beyond self-perception: The others’ view of the European Union’, European Foreign Affairs Review, Special Issue, 12(3). Lucarelli, S. (2014), ‘Seen from the outside: The state of the art on the external image of the EU’, Journal ofEuropean Integration, 36(1), 1-16. Lucarelli, S. and L. Fioramonti (2009), External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor, London: Routledge. Lucarelli, S. and I. Manners (2006), Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy, London: Routledge. Luntumbue, V. (2019), ‘The European Union as a middle power’, 2 May, accessed 15 June 2020 at https://europeglobalactor.cei.iscte-iul.pt/the-european-union-as-a -middle-power/ Lynch, D. (2005),‘Communicating Europe to the world: What public diplomacy for the EU?’, EPC Working Paper, Brussels: European Policy Centre, No. 21. Maines, R. (1995), ‘“Leader” and “entrepreneur” in international negotiations: A con
ceptual analysis’, European Journal ofInternational Relations, 1(1), 87-112. Manners, I. (2002), ‘Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-58. Maoz, Z. and L. Terris (2006), ‘Credibility and strategy in international mediation’, International Interactions, 32(4), 409-40. Maoz, Z. and L. Tems (2008), ‘Credibility and strategy in international mediation’, in J. Bercovitch and S. Gartner (eds), International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings, London: Routledge, Chapter 4. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis ofPolitics, New York: The Free Press. Marks, M.P. (2011), Metaphors in International Relations Theory, New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Marks, M.P. (2018), Revisiting Metaphors in International Relations Theory, New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Mayer, H. (2013), ‘The challenge of coherence and consistency in EU foreign policy’, in M. Telò and F. Ponjaert (eds), The EU’s Foreign Policy: What Kind ofPower and Diplomatic Action?, Famham: Ashgate, pp. 105-17. McCombs, M.E. and D.L. Shaw (1972), ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-87. McDonald, A. (2021), ‘EU’s UK ambassador denies ”vaccine nationalism” amid export row’, Politico, 11 March, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.politico.eu/ article/eus-uk-ambassador-denies-vaccine-nationalism-amid-export-row/ McLaren, L. (2002), ‘Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefits analysis or perceived cultural threat?’, The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551-66.
198 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Melissen, J. (2005a), ‘Introduction’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. xix-xxiv. Melissen, J. (2005b), ‘The new public diplomacy between theory and practice’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 3-27. Meunier, S. and K. Nicolaïdis (2005), ‘The European Union as a trade power’, in C. Hill and M. Smith (eds), International Relations and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247-69. Michalski, A. (2005), ‘The EU as a soft power: The force of persuasion’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 124^44. Mills, C.W. (1956), The Power Elite, New York: Oxford University Press. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine (MFA of Ukraine) (n.d.), accessed 19 June 2020 at https://ukraine-eu.mfa.gov.ua/en/2633-relations Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (n.d.), ‘Euro-Atlantic integration’, accessed 12 April 2021 at https://mvs.gov.ua/en/ministry/euro-atlantic-integration Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin and L. Roselle (2013), Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order, New York: Routledge. Monnet, J. (1976), Mémoires, Paris: Fayard. Morozova, O. (2019), ‘Ukraine’s journey to Europe: Strategie macronarrative and conceptual metaphors’, European Security, 28(3), 323—40. Movahedi, S. (1985), ‘The social psychology of foreign policy and the
politics of inter national images’, Human Affairs, 8(19), 18-37. NATO (2020), ‘NATO recognises Ukraine as enhanced opportunities partner’, accessed 26 June 2020 at https://www.nato. int/cps/en/natohq/news_176327.htm Natorski, M. (2016), ‘The EU and crisis in Ukraine: Policy continuity in times of disor der?’, in D. Bouris and T. Schumacher (eds), The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy. Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 177-96. Natorski, M. (2018), ‘EU mediation practices in Ukraine during revolutions: What authority as a peacemaker?’, International Negotiation, 23(2), 278-98. Natorski, M. and K. Pomorska (2017), ‘Trust and decision-making in times of crisis: The EU’s response to the events in Ukraine’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 54-70. Neagu, M.-I. (2013), Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation, New York: Pal grave Macmillan. Neuman, W.R., M. Just and A.N. Crigler (1992), Common Knowledge: News and the Construction ofPolitical Meaning, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Nossal, K.R. (2010), ‘“Middlepowerhood” and “Middlepowermanship” in Canadian foreign policy’, in N. Hynek and D. Bosold (eds), Canada’s Foreign and Security Policy: Soft and Hard Strategies ofa Middle Power, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 20-34. Nye, J., Jr. (2007), Understanding International Conflict: An Introduction to Theory and History, New York: Pearson Longman. Nye, J., Jr. (2008), ‘Public diplomacy and soft power’, The Annals of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, 616(1),
94-109. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2021), ‘Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 1 August 2020 to 31 January
References 199 2021’, accessed 12 April 2021 at https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/ 31 stReportUkraine-en.pdf. Olsen, H. (2021), Opinion: Vaccine nationalism is a corrective to often-naive views of globalism’, The Washington Post, 27 March, accessed 10 April 2021 at https:// www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/26/vaccine-nationalism-proves-that -globalists-support-multilaterialism-until-it-no-longer-suits-them/ Oppermann, К. and A. Spencer (2013), ‘Thinking alike? Salience and metaphor anal ysis as cognitive approaches to foreign policy analysis’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 9(1), 39-56. Orenstein, M. and R.D. Kelemen (2017), ‘Trojan horses in EU foreign policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 87-102. Ortega, M. (ed.) (2004), Global Views on the European Union, Chaillot Paper, No. 72, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/ISS_EU _chai72e.pdf Pan, Z. and G. Kosicki (1993), ‘Framing analysis: An approach to new discourse’, Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75. Pardo, S. (2015), Normative Power Europe Meets Israel: Fundamentals on IsraeliEuropean Union Relations, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Parker, C., C. Karlsson, M. Hjerpe and В-O. Linnér (2012), ‘Fragmented climate change leadership. Making sense of the ambiguous COP-15 outcome’, Environmental Politics, 21(2), 268-86. Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Payne, R. (2013), Global Issues, New York: Pearson. PPMI/NCRE/ NFG (2015), ‘Analysis of the perceptions of the EU and the EU’s poli cies abroad’,
Commissioned by European External Action Service (EEAS), accessed 8 May 2020 at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/fpi/showcases/eujperceptions_study_en.htm Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (2019), ‘Death toll up to 13,000 in Ukraine conflict, says UN Rights Office’, 26 February, accessed 12 April 2021 at https://www.rfer։ .org/a/death-toll-up-to-13-000-m-ukraine-conflict-says-un-rights-office/29791647 .html# :~:text=%220HCHR%20estimates%20the%20total%20number,%2212 %2C800%2D 13%2C000%20killed.%22 Rapport, A. (2017), ‘Cognitive approaches to foreign policy analysis’, Oxford Research Encyclopaedias. Politics, accessed 9 April 2021 at https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190228637.013.397 Rasmussen, S. (2009), ‘Discourse analysis of EU public diplomacy messages and practices’, Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, accessed 8 May 2020 at https://www.clingendael.org/sites/ default/files/pdfs/20090700_cdsp_discussion_paper_l 15_Rasmussen.pdf Rayroux, A. (2018), ‘The EU’s reputation in Canada: Still a shallow strategic part nership?’, in N. Chaban and M. Holland (eds), Shaping the EU's Global Strategy: Partners and Perceptions, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 55-76. Razumkov Centre (2016a), ‘Ukrainian identity: Changes, trends, regional aspects’, National Security and Defence, 3-4, accessed 21 June 2020 at http://razumkov.org . ua/uploads/j oumal/eng/NSD 161 -162J2016_eng.pdf Razumkov Centre (2016b), ‘Зовнішньополітичні орієнтації громадян України’, accessed 21 October 2019 at: http://razumkov.org.ua/napryamki/sotsiolohichni
-doslidzhennia/rezultaty-sotsiolohichnoho-doslidzhennia-tsentru-razumkova -zovnishnopolitychni-oriientatsii-hromadian-ukrainy
200 7%e Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles Riordan, S. (2005), ‘Dialogue-based public diplomacy: A new foreign policy para digm?’, in J. Melissen (ed.). The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan, pp. 180-95. Rosén Sundström, M. and O. Elgström (2019), ‘Praise or critique? Sweden’s feminist foreign policy in the eyes of its fellow EU members’, European Politics and Society, DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1661940 Savim, В. (2008), ‘Information, bias, and mediation success’, International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 25-47. Schafer, M. (1997), ‘Images and policy preferences’, Political Psychology, 18(4), 813-29. Schaffer, F. (2016), Elucidating Social Science Concepts. An Interpretivist Guide, Abington and NY : Routledge. Scharpf, F. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schengenvisainfo.news (2020), ‘Ukrainians have made nearly 49 million trips to EU, during three years of visa-free travel’, 19 April, accessed 12 April 2021 at https:// www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/ukrainians-have-made-nearly-49-million-trips-to -eu-during-three-years-of-visa-ffee-travel/ Schiller, F. (1803), ‘An die Freunde’, Poem. Sheahan, L.,N. Chaban, O. Elgström andM. Holland (2010), ‘Benign partner or benign master? Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations between the EU and the Pacific Islands’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 15(3), 347-66. Shen, Y. and N. Balaban (1999), ‘Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse’, Discourse Processes, 28(2), 139-53. Silverstein, В. and C. Flamenbaum (1989),
‘Biases in the perception and cognition of the actions of enemies’, Journal ofSocial Issues, 45(2), 51-72. Sjursen, H. (2006), ‘What kind of power? European foreign policy in perspective’, Journal ofEuropean Public Policy, 13(2), 169-81. Skinner, Q. (2002), Visions of Politics, Volume 1: Regarding Method, New York: Cambridge University Press. Smith, H. (2002), European Union Foreign Policy: What It Is and What It Does, London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. Steen, G. (2013), ‘When is metaphor deliberate?’, in N-L. Johannesson and D. Minugh (eds), Selected Papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival, Stockholm: Stockholm University Press, pp. 47-63. Stein, J.G. (2013), ‘Threat perception in international relations’, in L. Huddy, D.O. Sears and J.S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 364—94. Stöckl, H. (2010), ‘Metaphor revisited: Cognitive conceptual versus traditional linguis tic perspectives’, AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 35(2), 189-207. Stumbaum, M-В., G. Mohan, О. Gippner, J. Zhao and A. Lutz (2015), ‘Does Europe matter? EU as a security actor in the Asian century’, NFG Final Report, 18, FU Berlin, accessed 21 June 2020 at https://refiibium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/ fubl88/18922/NFG_fmal_report_15111 l.pdf?sequence=l isAllowed=y Suchman, M.C. (1995), ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy ofManagement Review, 20(3), 571-610. Svensson, I. (2009), ‘Who brings which peace? Neutral versus biased mediation and institutional peace arrangements in civil
wars’, Journal ofConflict Resolution, 53(3), 446-69.
References 201 Taylor, S.E. and S.T. Fiske (1975), ‘Point of view and perceptions of causality’, Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439-45. Techau, J. (2020), ‘Saving Europe from corona’s nasty geopolitics’, EUobserver, 15 April, accessed 19 June 2020 at https://euobserver.com/opinion/148057 Teles Fazendeiro, В. (2016), ‘Rethinking roles: Reflexive role ascription and performativity in international relations’, International Studies Review, 18(3), 487-507. The Guardian (2020), ‘The Guardian view on Europe after Brexit: unity is strength’, 18 February, accessed 21 June 2020 at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2020/feb/18/the-guardian-view-on-europe-after-brexit-unity-is-strength The Guardian (2021), ‘The Observer view on the dangers of vaccine nationalism’, 21 March, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2021/mar/21/the-observer-view-on-the-dangers-of-vaccine-nationalism Thies, C. (2012), ‘International socialization processes vs. Israeli national role con ceptions: Can role theory integrate IR theory and foreign policy analysis?’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 25—46. Thies, C. and M. Breuning (2012), ‘Integrating foreign policy analysis and international relations through role theory’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 1^4. Thomas, D.C. (2012), ‘Still punching below its weight? Coherence and effectiveness in European Union foreign policy’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 50(3), 457-74. Toje, A. (2010), The European Union as a Small Power, London: Paigrave Macmillan. Touval, S. (1975), ‘Biased intermediaries:
Theoretical and historical considerations’, Jerusalem Journal ofInternational Affairs, 1, 51-69. Touval, S. and I.W. Zartman (eds) (1985), International Mediation in Theory and Practice, Boulder, CO: Westview. Tsuruoka, M. (2006), ‘How external perspectives of the European Union are shaped: Endogenous and exogenous sources’, paper prepared for the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Fukuoka, Japan. Tsuruoka, M. (2008), “‘Expectations deficit” in EU-Japan relations: Why EU-Japan partnership cannot flourish’, Current Politics and Economics ofAsia, 17(1), 107-26. Umland, A. (2019), ‘The Zelensky enigma: A different kind of populist’, European Council on Foreign Relations, accessed November 30, 2020, at https://ecfr.eu/ article/commentary_zelensky_enigma_ukraine_election_president/ Underdal, A. (1994), ‘Leadership theory: Rediscovering the arts of management’, in I.W. Zartmann (ed.), International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management ofComplexity, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 178-97. Wallensteen, P. and I. Svensson (2014), ‘Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflicts’, Journal ofPeace Research, 51(2), 315-27. Watson, A. (1982), Diplomacy: The Dialogue between States, London: Routledge. White, R. (1968), Nobody Wanted War: Misperception in Vietnam and Other Wars, Garden City: Doubleday. Whitman, R. (2005), ‘Winning hearts and minds for Europe’, in R. Youngs (ed.), GLOBAL EUROPE Report 2: New Terms of Engagement, The Foreign Policy Centre/The British Council/The European Commission, in association
with Wilton Park, pp. 30-37. Whitman, R. (2011), Normative Powers Europe: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives, London: Routledge. Whitman, R. (2019), ‘The future(s) of the EU foreign policy studies’, Presentation at the workshop External projection - International roles and responsibilities, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 18 January.
202 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles World Health Organisation (WHO) (2021), WHO Coronavirus (CO VID-19) Dashboard, accessed 10 April 2021 at https://covidl9.who.int/table Wright, M. (2009), Gower Handbook of Internal Communication, London: Taylor Francis Group. Young, O. (1967), The Intermediaries. Third Parties in International Crises, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Zartman, I.W. (1994), ‘Two’s company and more’s a crowd. The complexities of mul tilateral negotiation’, in I.W. Zartman (ed.), International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 178-97. Zartman, I.W. (2008), ‘Introduction bias, pre-negotiation and leverage in mediation’, International Negotiation, 13(3), 305-10. Zashin, E. and P. Chapman (1974), ‘The use of metaphor and analogy: Towards a renewal of political language’, The Journal ofPolitics, 36(2), 290-326. Zhabotynskaya, S. (2013a), ‘Konceptual'naya metafora v special'nom yazyke: proce dura analiza’ [Conceptual metaphor in a language for specific purposes]. Inostrannye yazyki v vysshej shkole (Ryazanskij gos. un-է imeni S.A. Esenina). Foreign lan guages in a higher school, S. Yesenin Ryazan State University, Russia, 3 (26), 24—32 (in Russian). Zhabotynskaya, S. (2013b), ‘Konceptual'naya metafora: kongruehntnoe і nekongruehntnoe kartirovanie vo mnozhestvennyh dannyh’ [Conceptual metaphor: con gruent and incongruent mapping in multiple data], in A.N. Rudyakov (ed.). Funkcional'naya lingvistika. Functional Linguistics, 5, 104-106 (in Russian).
Zhabotynskaya, S. (2016), ‘Kontseptualnyie metafory v rechah Baraka Obamy і Vladimira Putina (2014—2015)’ [Conceptual metaphors in the public speeches of Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin (2014—2015)]. (In Russian). Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 13, 43-91. Zhabotynska, S. (2018), ‘Images of Ukraine-EU relations in conceptual metaphors of Ukrainian mass media’, Cognition, Communication, Discourse. Special issue ‘Ukraine-EURelations: Verbal Narratives, Images, and Perceptions, 17, 118—40. Zhabotynska, S. and V. Velivchenko (2018), ‘New media and strategic narratives: The Dutch referendum on Ukraine - EU Association Agreement in Ukrainian and Russian internet blogs’, European Security, 28(3), 360-81. Zhang, L. (2015), ‘Reflexive expectations’ in EU-China relations: A media analysis approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 463-79. Zielonka, J. (2014), Is the EU Doomed?, Cambridge: Polity Press. Zyla, B. (2020), ‘Middle-power internationalism in-between European “paradise” and American “power”? Canada’s political role in an age of Trumpism and Brexit’, Australian and New Zealand Journal ofEuropean Studies, 11(3), 63-77.
Index AA (Association Agreement) 1, 79, 103, 122, 150, 185 ACP (Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific) 24 political 8, 10, 37, 49, 182 studies 8 comparative analysis 17, 37, 44, 49, 142 conceptual metaphor 8, 16, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 62, 70, 74, 87, 107-8, 109-11,116, 136, 182 conceptual metaphor theory 3, 4, 15, 16, 19, 26, 30-33, 35, 36, 45, 164, 180 Constitutional Treaty (2008) 10,11, 34 context-specific roles 20, 22 Copenhagen Conference of the Parties (2009) 11,24 Covid-19 15, 54, 80, 183, 184 credibility 9, 17, 25, 55, 99, 100, 101, 106, 118,119,155,163 cultural diplomacy 17, 47, 57, 125. 126, 134,138, 144 bilateral partner 43, 45, 46, 47, 79-98, 145, 150-52,162, 169, 172, 173, 175, 177, 181 bilateral trade 80 Borrell, Josep 2, 4 Brexit 12, 13, 14, 34, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59, 61, 70, 76, 149 capability-expectations gap 8, 23, 47, 81,82 capable ally 56, 76, 161 cascading activation framing theory 10, 14 case-specific conceptual templates 47 China 4, 11, 12, 13,39, 146, 149 chronological coherence 25-6 coding interviews global 44,45 latent 44, 45 manifest 44—5 cognitive approach 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 26, 30, 32 cognitive consistency 23, 25 cognitive linguistics 3, 6, 15, 31, 37, 46, 180 cognitive mental mapping 34 coherence 25-6, 55, 76, 99, 100, 106, 156 cohorts 5, 33, 40, 41, 44, 49, 93, 108, 113, 129,160 collaborative diplomacy 124, 144 common market 51 communication 15, 17, 42, 53, 79, 120, 123, 124,127,128,139, 158, 159, 172 changing landscape 9, 10 data analysis 37, 43-8 data collection 37, 40-43 Disaggregating EU Perceptions in China (2009-12) 39 EaP (Eastern Partnership)
1, 2, 79, 99, 152, 182 EEAS (European External Action Service) 1, 41, 160 emotions 3, 5, 12, 29-30, 32, 39, 52, 76, 107, 118,165,182 ENP (European Neighbourhood Policy) 79, 99, 103 Erasmus+ 41, 80,133,134, 136,140 ESS (European Security Strategy) 7,12 EU (European Union) behaviour 4, 16, 24, 82 as a bilateral partner 79-98, 150-52, 162, 169, 172, 173, 175, 177, 181 Brexit 12,13, 14, 34, 54, 55, 58, 59, 61, 70, 76, 149 203
204 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles coherence 76, 99, 100, 106 comparative studies 2, 41 constitution 115 diplomatic relations with Ukraine 122—44 disunity 58, 73, 75 as an economic power 11, 77, 102, 145 EU-Ukraine relations 33, 41, 47, 52, 55, 60, 61, 77, 79, 80-82, 85, 87, 96--7, 105, 119, 123, 147, 152,160, 178, 170, 183 external action 15, 16, 40, 75, 99, 123, 125 external expectations of 81, 82, 83, 84, 97 external partners 3, 4, 9,11, 51, 53, 55, 81, 82,183 external perceptions of 5, 6-16, 19, 20,24, 33, 52, 54, 56-61, 75, 97 external perceptions see external perceptions of the EU financial crisis 10, 11, 13, 38, 46, 47, 53, 54, 61, 70,148, 183 foreign policy 1, 2, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 26, 33-5, 36, 59, 102, 181,182,183, 184 as a global actor 13, 14, 15, 59, 81 as a global leader 50, 52, 54, 57, 58, 68, 71, 74, 75, 145-9 Global Perceptions project 8, 10, 37,38 as a global power 50, 52, 54, 56, 68, 71, 74, 75, 145-9 Global Strategy (2016) 1, 4, 12,13, 14,125, 152, 183 images of see images of the EU interest in Ukraine 72, 73, 76, 80, 83, 92, 94, 97 internal divides 9, 11 international identity 7, 8, 9 leadership 14, 24, 57, 62, 71, 75, 146, 161, 169, 183 mediation in Russia-Ukraine conflict 102-7 as a mediator 17, 45, 46, 99-121, 153-6, 163, 168, 170, 171, 172, 173 migration crisis 54, 58, 59, 60, 61, 67, 70, 76, 148, 171 perceived attractiveness of 55, 60 policy 3, 24, 82, 87, 122,176,177, 178 power and leadership 51, 56, 62, 68, 71, 75, 149,182 as a public diplomacy actor 17, 45, 46,47, 47, 122-44, 145, 156-9, 160, 163-4, 165, 170, 174
reaction to Ukraine crisis 53 reputation 10, 53, 54, 74, 76,106, 143, 148 role performance 4,16, 24, 82, 97, 181 roles 4, 16, 17, 24, 37, 75, 82, 97, 126, 162, 165, 170, 181 sanctions against Russia 80, 99, 102, 103, 104, 107, 113, 136, 153, 155. 156, 163, 173 self-image 7, 13, 38, 41, 49, 142, 145, 162, 168, 169, 170, 174, 175, 181 self-perception 4, 17, 24, 35, 82, 145-59, 173,176,181 studies 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 31, 33-5, 49, 181, 182 weakening of 60, 61, 67 Euro 7, 9, 34 Eurobarometer survey 13 EuroBroadMap project 39 Euromaidan 84, 97 European disintegration 54 European integration 1,7, 11, 39, 53, 54, 60, 65, 72, 74, 81, 91,127,129, 175 Eurozone debt crisis 10, 11,13, 38,46, 47, 53, 54, 61, 70, 148, 183 EU-Ukraine summit (2019) 79 EU-Ukraine trade 80 exchange diplomacy 125,126 expectation gaps 82-6, 97 expectation-performance gap 4, 16, 24, 36, 82, 83, 97, 98, 160, 176, 178, 181 expectations deficit 23, 81, 83, 97 external credibility 25 external perceiver 33, 34, 35, 38
205 Index external perceptions of the EU 3, 4, 5, 6-16, 19, 24, 33^1, 37,41,42, 45, 51, 52, 73, 74, 75, 181 comparing 5, 17,49, 160-79, 182 contextual nature of 57 first wave (early 2000s-2009) 7-9, 37-8 as a global leader 53, 75, 160-62 as a global power 53, 160-62 as a mediator 99,100,163—4 as a public diplomacy actor 17, 123, 124-6, 142, 144 second wave (2009-16) 9-12, 38-9 studies 37-40, 58 third wave (2016-present) 12-16, 40 Ukraine 4, 10, 14, 39, 43, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56-61,82, 97, 100, 118, 123,126, 131,169, 170, 185 External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor (2006-07) 8 foreign policy 3, 4, 6, 21, 34, 81, 147 actor 2, 4, 19, 20, 81 analysis 6, 16, 22, 26, 180 behaviour 21 coherence 100 conduct 4, 6, 7 decisions 26, 55 effectiveness 59 EU 1,2, 8, 10, 12, 14-17, 19,21, 26, 33-6, 59, 102, 181, 1824, 21, 59 perceptions of 19,20 perceptual approach 33-6 priorities 34 roles 16, 21, 36 studies 2, 3, 5, 7, 8,16, 18, 26, 30, 31, 33,183 Ukraine 1 FPI (Service for Foreign Policy Instruments) 125 hope-performance gap 4, 17, 179, 180, 181, 183 horizontal coherence 25-6 image theory 3,12,15, 19, 26-30, 31, 96, 97 image types 55,96, 97, 118,177 images of the EU 2, 5, 33, 34, 39, 47, 48, 50, 52, 53, 62, 77, 175 contrasting 74,120, 140, 169 external 13, 37,38, 181, 184 as a leader 177 metaphorical 165 negative 11,14, 73, 141,143,149, 168, 169 as a partner 183 positive 93, 94,120 self-image 7, 13, 38, 41, 49, 142, 145, 162, 168, 169, 170, 174, 175,181 Ukrainian 49, 76,172, 181 Images of the EU as an international negotiator in multilateral settings (2007/2010) 8, 37
impartiality 17, 99,100, 101,102,106, 120, 163 implementation coherence 25-6 incoherence 26, 106, 119, 149, 161 input legitimacy 25 IR (International Relations) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,9, 17,27,50,55, 124, 181 ‘cognitive turn’ 3, 8, 26,180 and foreign policy study 3, 5, 6, 8, 17, 18, 22, 26,31,32, 33, 180 images and perceptions 6, 17,19, 26, 27, 49, 180, 182 images/image theory 26, 27, 28, 31, 36, 164, 180 metaphor 31 and regional studies 4, 181 roles/role theory 3, 20, 21, 27,28, 32, 36,49, 180 studies 9,18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 182 great power 20, 23, 46, 50, 51, 56, 57, 68, 71, 73, 75, 145-9, 153, 160-62 Guardian 12, 15 Kyiv 1,41, 104, 122, 128 Kyoto protocol 24 ‘history-making events’ 29, 35, 36, 52 leadership 5, 20, 47, 50, 171, 177, 178
206 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles definition 51-2 directional 50, 52, 57, 75 EU 14, 24, 57,62, 71,75, 146, 161, 169,183 instrumental 52 lack of 58 normative 146 power and 16, 50, 51, 56-8, 62, 68, 71, 74, 75, 149, 182 roles 50, 52, 57, 146, 161 structural 50, 52, 57 Ukraine 1, 183 legitimacy 8, 9, 17, 19, 25-6, 55, 60, 76 linguistic metaphor 30, 42, 62, 70, 72, 138,139, 140, 170 Lisbon Treaty (2009) 10, 11, 34, 122, 125 ‘logic of appropriateness’ 19 Maidan 1, 2, 14, 56, 79, 84, 97, 102, 175 media 6, 9, 11,13, 37, 38, 39, 40. 60, 84, 86, 137 Ukrainian 14, 127, 128 mediation effectiveness 17, 47, 100-102, 119, 120 metaphor analysis 44, 119, 120, 162. 164,173, 182 cognitive element 169-70 emotive element 165-9, 166, 167 EU as a bilateral partner 87-97, 88-91 EU as a mediator 107-118, 109-11 EU as a power and leader 62-75, 63-6 EU as a public diplomacy actor 135^11, 136-7 normative element 175-6 metaphors of body and capacity 62, 67, 68, 145,157, 168, 170-71 comparing metaphors 75-7, 164-76, 167 conceptual 8, 16, 30-32, 44, 45, 48, 62, 70. 74. 87, 107, 108, 109-11, 116, 136-7, 139, 147, 149,165, 181 conceptual metaphor theory 3, 4, 15, 16, 19, 26, 30-33, 35, 36, 45, 164, 180 congruent 62 deliberate 45 of family and authority 72-4, 94-6, 108, 145, 147, 150, 151,168, 172-3 of games/sports 62, 66,107, 109, 153, 154 of growth 107, 108,110,115-16, 118, 147, 154,168 of health 62, 67, 87, 91, 147, 148 linguistic 30, 42, 62, 70, 72, 138, 139,140,170 of movement and space 71-2, 116, 146, 148,154, 171-2 negative 96, 116,149, 165,168, 170, 173 non-deliberate 45 of partners
in relations 108, 112-15, 135,137-40, 150, 153, 156, 165, 168,169,173-4 personification 62, 72, 73, 87, 94, 107, 108,135,139,143, 149, 156,157, 175 positive 96, 159, 168 of pressure 117-18,173 of romantic relations 87, 88, 92—4, 96, 97 of stability, structure, substance, and mechanism 68-71, 117, 147, 155, 168,171 of visibility and focus 140-41 of warfare 87, 107, 110 meta-roles 20, 22 methodology 16, 37-49 migration 38, 48, 58, 59, 60, 147, 161 crisis 46, 54, 59, 60, 61, 67, 70, 76, 148, 171 irregular 13, 54 Minsk II peace talks 46, 103, 119, 123, 153, 172, 185 modes of interactions 126-35 collaboration mode 124, 132-5, 142 dialogue mode 124, 129-32. 135, 142 monologue mode 124, 126-9, 135, 142 moral power 20 multiple stakeholders 9,123, 124 multipolar 7, 9, 12, 33
Index NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) 1, 57, 102, 125, 127, 185 ‘new’ public diplomacy 123-4, 143 non-traditional security threats 12 normative legitimacy 25 normative power 20, 38, 50, 56,145, 149, 160 Normative Power Europe 8, 10 no-visa entry 80, 139 OHCHR (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) 4 Otherness 4, 15, 18, 21, 24, 82, 181, 185 Others 4, 9, 17, 19, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 82,169,176,180, 181 outcome partiality 101, 107, 120 output legitimacy 25 ‘outside-in’ perspective 16, 183 perceived capability 55, 58, 97 perceived credibility 101 perceived incoherence 26, 119, 177 perceived power 5, 76,180 perceived status 28, 55, 60 perceived threat 27, 28, 34, 36, 55, 59, 61,76 perception gap 4, 16,17, 24, 25, 36, 47, 82, 142, 160, 169, 170, 173-8, 180, 181, 183 perceptions of effectiveness 99, 100, 120 ‘perceptual inferential scheme’ 26, 27 personification metaphor 62, 72, 73, 87, 94,107,108, 135, 139, 143,149, 156, 157, 175 populism 12, 46, 54, 59, 60, 61, 63, 67, 69, 70,74, 76, 147, 148, 161, 171, 184, 185 power commercial 145 definition 51 economic 11, 50, 56, 77,102, 145 great 20, 23, 46, 50,51,56, 57, 68, 71, 73, 75,145-9, 153, 160-62 hard power 51, 69, 71,102, 160 judgement 50 207 and leadership 16, 50, 51, 56-8, 62, 68, 71, 74, 75,149, 182 middle 20, 38 moral 20 normative 20, 38, 50, 56, 145, 149, 160 perceptions 23, 36, 56, 76. 180 positions 50, 53 soft power 7, 8, 9, 25, 51, 56, 57, 69, 75, 125, 143,145,146,160 processual partiality 101 public diplomacy 10, 11,16-17, 45, 46, 47, 112,120, 122^15, 156-9, 160, 163^1, 165,174, 176-8,
181-3 reflexive expectations 23-5, 81, 97 relational partiality 101, 106,120 research design 7, 37, 38, 41,42, 44,49 Revolution of Dignity 1, 79, 83, 122,123 role model 10, 50, 52 role theory 3, 5, 6, 8,16, 19-36, 82,180, agency and structure 22-3, 35 context-specific roles 20, 22 metaphors 30-33 meta-roles 20, 22 origin 19 role change 19, 23, 29, 30, 35,176 role conception 2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27,28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 40, 44, 152, 162, 176, 181 role conflict 22, 23, 160,176-9, 180 role dynamics 27, 28 role incongruence 17, 22, 23-5, 33, 160,176-9, 180 role perceptions 16, 17, 45, 49, 160-64, 165, 169 role performance 4,16, 22, 24, 26, 82, 83, 85, 97, 99, 100, 104-7,156, 159, 160,163, 164, 178, 181, 183 role prescriptions 19, 21, 27, 28, 35, 36, 37, 40, 162, 176, 180 role set 22, 23, 176 Russia 12, 13, 61, 81,105, 106, 109-11, 112, 116, 117, 119, 120, 134, 135, 184, 185 annexation of Crimea 12, 53, 80, 97, 102 attempts to undermine EU 67, 68, 69, 87, 129
208 The Ukraine crisis and EUforeign policy roles EU sanctions against 80, 99, 102, 103, 104, 107, 113, 136,153, 155, 156, 163, 173 Minsk II peace talks 46, 103, 119, 123, 153, 172, 185 perceptions of 34 Russia-Ukraine conflict 4, 12, 15, 17,41,46,51,76,80, 99, 100, 102-7, 115, 127, 145, 171 schema 8, 27, 28, 37 Schengen Zone 7, 9, 80, 115, 139, 184, 185 scope conditions 29 September 11 attacks (2001) 7, 10 social identity theory 8, 34 socio-cultural knowledge 31 soft power 7, 8, 9, 25, 51, 56, 57, 69, 75, 125, 143, 145, 146, 160 traditional diplomacy 16, 123, 183 Trump, President Donald 12, 14 Tusk, President Donald 79 Ukraine annexation of Crimea 12, 53, 80, 97, 102 citizens 1, 80, 139, 184, 185 constitution 1, 56, 81 diplomatic relations with EU 122 EU interest in 72, 73, 76, 80, 83, 84 EU relations with 33, 41, 47, 52, 55, 60, 61, 77, 79-82, 85, 87, 96, 97, 105, 119, 123, 147, 152, 160,178, 170, 183 EU support 80, 81, 99, 103,104, 127 ‘European choice’ 53, 56, 60, 76, 81,97, 123,129, 161,184 foreign policy 1 leadership 1, 183 media 14, 127,128 Minsk II peace talks 46, 103, 119, 123, 153,172,185 parliament 1 as a partner 85, 93, 96 perception of EU 10, 14, 39, 51, 53, 54, 56-61, 75, 84, 86, 94, 95, 100, 127 perspectives on EU as a mediator 104-7 post-Maidan 2, 14, 56, 79, 84 reform 79, 80, 81, 86, 95, 96, 97, 133 Revolution of Dignity 1, 79, 83, 122,123 Russia-Ukraine conflict 4, 12, 15, 17,41,46,51,76, 80, 99, 100,102-7,127, 145, 171 social research 10, 39 threats to 61, 82, 132, 135,142 Ukraine-Brussels dialogue 61 Ukraine-UK dialogue 61 UN Climate Change conferences
11 weak ally 56, 76-7 Yanukovych, President Viktor 1 youth opinion 39 Zelensky, President Volodymyr 184,185 Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München J |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Chaban, Natalia 1971- Elgström, Ole 1950- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1139137298 (DE-588)170429105 |
| author_facet | Chaban, Natalia 1971- Elgström, Ole 1950- |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Chaban, Natalia 1971- |
| author_variant | n c nc o e oe |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047272981 |
| classification_rvk | MK 5250 ML 1100 ML 7260 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1264258169 (DE-599)BVBBV047272981 |
| discipline | Politologie |
| discipline_str_mv | Politologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02978nam a2200541 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047272981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220919 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210506s2021 |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781789907520</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback : £80.00</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78990-752-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1264258169</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047272981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MK 5250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123079:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MK 5250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123079:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ML 1100</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123137:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ML 7260</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123212:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaban, Natalia</subfield><subfield code="d">1971-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1139137298</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles</subfield><subfield code="b">images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations</subfield><subfield code="c">Natalia Chaban (Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Department of Media and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Ole Elgström (Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Edward Elgar Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">vii, 208 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Selbstbild</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077349-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Selbstbild</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077349-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elgström, Ole</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)170429105</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-78990-753-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV047495160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20211015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032676639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Ukraine |
| id | DE-604.BV047272981 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:14:50Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:07:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781789907520 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032676639 |
| oclc_num | 1264258169 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-521 DE-12 DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-521 DE-12 DE-29 |
| physical | vii, 208 Seiten Diagramme |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20211015 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Chaban, Natalia 1971- Verfasser (DE-588)1139137298 aut The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations Natalia Chaban (Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Department of Media and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Ole Elgström (Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden) Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA Edward Elgar Publishing [2021] © 2021 vii, 208 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd rswk-swf Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 gnd rswk-swf Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 s Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 s Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 g DE-604 Elgström, Ole 1950- Verfasser (DE-588)170429105 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-78990-753-7 (DE-604)BV047495160 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register |
| spellingShingle | Chaban, Natalia 1971- Elgström, Ole 1950- The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4003846-4 (DE-588)4077349-8 (DE-588)4061496-7 |
| title | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations |
| title_auth | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations |
| title_exact_search | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations |
| title_full | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations Natalia Chaban (Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Department of Media and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Ole Elgström (Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden) |
| title_fullStr | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations Natalia Chaban (Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Department of Media and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Ole Elgström (Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden) |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations Natalia Chaban (Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Department of Media and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Ole Elgström (Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden) |
| title_short | The Ukraine crisis and EU foreign policy roles |
| title_sort | the ukraine crisis and eu foreign policy roles images of the eu in the context of eu ukraine relations |
| title_sub | images of the EU in the context of EU-Ukraine relations |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Außenpolitik Selbstbild Ukraine |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032676639&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chabannatalia theukrainecrisisandeuforeignpolicyrolesimagesoftheeuinthecontextofeuukrainerelations AT elgstromole theukrainecrisisandeuforeignpolicyrolesimagesoftheeuinthecontextofeuukrainerelations |