Legal pluralism explained: history, theory, consequences
"Throughout the medieval period law was seen as the product of social groups and associations that formed legal orders, as Max Weber elaborates, "either constituted in its membership by such objective characteristics of birth, political, ethnic, or religious denomination, mode of life or o...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
Oxford University Press
[2021]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Rezension |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Throughout the medieval period law was seen as the product of social groups and associations that formed legal orders, as Max Weber elaborates, "either constituted in its membership by such objective characteristics of birth, political, ethnic, or religious denomination, mode of life or occupation, or arose through the process of explicit fraternization." During the second half of the Middle Ages, roughly the tenth through fifteenth centuries, there were "several distinct types of law, sometimes competing, occasionally overlapping, invariably invoking different traditions, jurisdictions and modes of operation." Types of law included imperial and royal edicts and statutes, canon law, unwritten customary law of tribes and localities, written Germanic law, residual Roman law, municipal statutes, the law of merchants and of guilds, and in England the common law, on the continent the Roman law of jurists after the twelfth century revival of the Justinian Code. The types of courts included various imperial and royal courts, ecclesiastical courts, manorial or seigniorial courts, village courts, municipal courts in cities, merchant courts, and guild courts. Serving as judges in these courts, respectively, were kings or their appointees, Bishops and abbots, barons or lords of the manor or their appointees, local lay leaders, leading burghers, merchants, and members of the guild. These various positions were not wholly separate-many high government officials were in religious orders, while Churches held landed estates that came with local judicial responsibilities. "Bishops, abbots and prioresses, as lords of temporal possessions, controlled manorial or honorial courts at which they sometimes, though not generally, presided in person, exercising responsibility for criminal and customary law." "The result was the existence of numerous law communities," Weber wrote, "the autonomous jurisdictions of which overlapped, the compulsory, political association being only one such autonomous jurisdiction in so far as it existed at all." Jurisdictional rules for judicial tribunals and the laws to be applied related to the persons involved and the subject matter at issue. The personality principle linked law to a person's community or association, and under feudalism property ownership came wrapped together with the right to judge those tied to the property. |
| Beschreibung: | x, 217 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780190861568 9780190861551 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047253397 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20231102 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210425s2021 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780190861568 |c paperback |9 978-0-19-086156-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780190861551 |9 978-0-19-086155-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1231554117 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047253397 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-384 |a DE-20 | ||
| 084 | |a PI 3200 |0 (DE-625)136596: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tamanaha, Brian Z. |d 1957- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)173163963 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal pluralism explained |b history, theory, consequences |c Brian Z. Tamanaha |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b Oxford University Press |c [2021] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
| 300 | |a x, 217 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Introduction : three themes -- Legal pluralism in historical context -- Postcolonial legal pluralism -- Legal pluralism in the west -- National to transnational legal pluralism -- Abstract versus folk legal pluralism -- Conclusion : legal pluralism explained | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Throughout the medieval period law was seen as the product of social groups and associations that formed legal orders, as Max Weber elaborates, "either constituted in its membership by such objective characteristics of birth, political, ethnic, or religious denomination, mode of life or occupation, or arose through the process of explicit fraternization." During the second half of the Middle Ages, roughly the tenth through fifteenth centuries, there were "several distinct types of law, sometimes competing, occasionally overlapping, invariably invoking different traditions, jurisdictions and modes of operation." Types of law included imperial and royal edicts and statutes, canon law, unwritten customary law of tribes and localities, written Germanic law, residual Roman law, municipal statutes, the law of merchants and of guilds, and in England the common law, on the continent the Roman law of jurists after the twelfth century revival of the Justinian Code. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a The types of courts included various imperial and royal courts, ecclesiastical courts, manorial or seigniorial courts, village courts, municipal courts in cities, merchant courts, and guild courts. Serving as judges in these courts, respectively, were kings or their appointees, Bishops and abbots, barons or lords of the manor or their appointees, local lay leaders, leading burghers, merchants, and members of the guild. These various positions were not wholly separate-many high government officials were in religious orders, while Churches held landed estates that came with local judicial responsibilities. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Bishops, abbots and prioresses, as lords of temporal possessions, controlled manorial or honorial courts at which they sometimes, though not generally, presided in person, exercising responsibility for criminal and customary law." "The result was the existence of numerous law communities," Weber wrote, "the autonomous jurisdictions of which overlapped, the compulsory, political association being only one such autonomous jurisdiction in so far as it existed at all." Jurisdictional rules for judicial tribunals and the laws to be applied related to the persons involved and the subject matter at issue. The personality principle linked law to a person's community or association, and under feudalism property ownership came wrapped together with the right to judge those tied to the property. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtspluralismus |0 (DE-588)1188757121 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a Legal polycentricity | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Legal polycentricity / History | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Legal polycentricity | |
| 653 | 6 | |a History | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rechtspluralismus |0 (DE-588)1188757121 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://www.recensio.net/r/1c473cb4fdbb4c138eb6b94e2dfa1388 |y rezensiert in: Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History, 30 (2022), S. 310-313 |3 Rezension |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032657449 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182398119706624 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1957- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)173163963 |
| author_facet | Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1957- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1957- |
| author_variant | b z t bz bzt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047253397 |
| classification_rvk | PI 3200 |
| contents | Introduction : three themes -- Legal pluralism in historical context -- Postcolonial legal pluralism -- Legal pluralism in the west -- National to transnational legal pluralism -- Abstract versus folk legal pluralism -- Conclusion : legal pluralism explained |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1231554117 (DE-599)BVBBV047253397 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04071nam a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047253397</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231102 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210425s2021 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190861568</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-086156-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190861551</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-086155-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1231554117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047253397</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136596:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamanaha, Brian Z.</subfield><subfield code="d">1957-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)173163963</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal pluralism explained</subfield><subfield code="b">history, theory, consequences</subfield><subfield code="c">Brian Z. Tamanaha</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">x, 217 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction : three themes -- Legal pluralism in historical context -- Postcolonial legal pluralism -- Legal pluralism in the west -- National to transnational legal pluralism -- Abstract versus folk legal pluralism -- Conclusion : legal pluralism explained</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Throughout the medieval period law was seen as the product of social groups and associations that formed legal orders, as Max Weber elaborates, "either constituted in its membership by such objective characteristics of birth, political, ethnic, or religious denomination, mode of life or occupation, or arose through the process of explicit fraternization." During the second half of the Middle Ages, roughly the tenth through fifteenth centuries, there were "several distinct types of law, sometimes competing, occasionally overlapping, invariably invoking different traditions, jurisdictions and modes of operation." Types of law included imperial and royal edicts and statutes, canon law, unwritten customary law of tribes and localities, written Germanic law, residual Roman law, municipal statutes, the law of merchants and of guilds, and in England the common law, on the continent the Roman law of jurists after the twelfth century revival of the Justinian Code. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The types of courts included various imperial and royal courts, ecclesiastical courts, manorial or seigniorial courts, village courts, municipal courts in cities, merchant courts, and guild courts. Serving as judges in these courts, respectively, were kings or their appointees, Bishops and abbots, barons or lords of the manor or their appointees, local lay leaders, leading burghers, merchants, and members of the guild. These various positions were not wholly separate-many high government officials were in religious orders, while Churches held landed estates that came with local judicial responsibilities. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Bishops, abbots and prioresses, as lords of temporal possessions, controlled manorial or honorial courts at which they sometimes, though not generally, presided in person, exercising responsibility for criminal and customary law." "The result was the existence of numerous law communities," Weber wrote, "the autonomous jurisdictions of which overlapped, the compulsory, political association being only one such autonomous jurisdiction in so far as it existed at all." Jurisdictional rules for judicial tribunals and the laws to be applied related to the persons involved and the subject matter at issue. The personality principle linked law to a person's community or association, and under feudalism property ownership came wrapped together with the right to judge those tied to the property. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtspluralismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1188757121</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal polycentricity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal polycentricity / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal polycentricity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rechtspluralismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1188757121</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://www.recensio.net/r/1c473cb4fdbb4c138eb6b94e2dfa1388</subfield><subfield code="y">rezensiert in: Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History, 30 (2022), S. 310-313</subfield><subfield code="3">Rezension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032657449</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047253397 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T17:08:38Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:06:55Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780190861568 9780190861551 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032657449 |
| oclc_num | 1231554117 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-384 DE-20 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-384 DE-20 |
| physical | x, 217 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1957- Verfasser (DE-588)173163963 aut Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences Brian Z. Tamanaha New York, NY Oxford University Press [2021] © 2021 x, 217 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Introduction : three themes -- Legal pluralism in historical context -- Postcolonial legal pluralism -- Legal pluralism in the west -- National to transnational legal pluralism -- Abstract versus folk legal pluralism -- Conclusion : legal pluralism explained "Throughout the medieval period law was seen as the product of social groups and associations that formed legal orders, as Max Weber elaborates, "either constituted in its membership by such objective characteristics of birth, political, ethnic, or religious denomination, mode of life or occupation, or arose through the process of explicit fraternization." During the second half of the Middle Ages, roughly the tenth through fifteenth centuries, there were "several distinct types of law, sometimes competing, occasionally overlapping, invariably invoking different traditions, jurisdictions and modes of operation." Types of law included imperial and royal edicts and statutes, canon law, unwritten customary law of tribes and localities, written Germanic law, residual Roman law, municipal statutes, the law of merchants and of guilds, and in England the common law, on the continent the Roman law of jurists after the twelfth century revival of the Justinian Code. The types of courts included various imperial and royal courts, ecclesiastical courts, manorial or seigniorial courts, village courts, municipal courts in cities, merchant courts, and guild courts. Serving as judges in these courts, respectively, were kings or their appointees, Bishops and abbots, barons or lords of the manor or their appointees, local lay leaders, leading burghers, merchants, and members of the guild. These various positions were not wholly separate-many high government officials were in religious orders, while Churches held landed estates that came with local judicial responsibilities. "Bishops, abbots and prioresses, as lords of temporal possessions, controlled manorial or honorial courts at which they sometimes, though not generally, presided in person, exercising responsibility for criminal and customary law." "The result was the existence of numerous law communities," Weber wrote, "the autonomous jurisdictions of which overlapped, the compulsory, political association being only one such autonomous jurisdiction in so far as it existed at all." Jurisdictional rules for judicial tribunals and the laws to be applied related to the persons involved and the subject matter at issue. The personality principle linked law to a person's community or association, and under feudalism property ownership came wrapped together with the right to judge those tied to the property. Rechtspluralismus (DE-588)1188757121 gnd rswk-swf Legal polycentricity Legal polycentricity / History History Rechtspluralismus (DE-588)1188757121 s DE-604 https://www.recensio.net/r/1c473cb4fdbb4c138eb6b94e2dfa1388 rezensiert in: Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History, 30 (2022), S. 310-313 Rezension |
| spellingShingle | Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1957- Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences Introduction : three themes -- Legal pluralism in historical context -- Postcolonial legal pluralism -- Legal pluralism in the west -- National to transnational legal pluralism -- Abstract versus folk legal pluralism -- Conclusion : legal pluralism explained Rechtspluralismus (DE-588)1188757121 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1188757121 |
| title | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences |
| title_auth | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences |
| title_exact_search | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences |
| title_full | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences Brian Z. Tamanaha |
| title_fullStr | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences Brian Z. Tamanaha |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legal pluralism explained history, theory, consequences Brian Z. Tamanaha |
| title_short | Legal pluralism explained |
| title_sort | legal pluralism explained history theory consequences |
| title_sub | history, theory, consequences |
| topic | Rechtspluralismus (DE-588)1188757121 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rechtspluralismus |
| url | https://www.recensio.net/r/1c473cb4fdbb4c138eb6b94e2dfa1388 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tamanahabrianz legalpluralismexplainedhistorytheoryconsequences |