Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments: = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Aachen
Apprimus Verlag
2021
|
Ausgabe: | 1. Auflage |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltstext Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | X, 188 Seiten Diagramme 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 300 g |
ISBN: | 9783863599591 3863599594 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000008c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047250076 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 210422s2021 gw |||| m||| 00||| eng d | ||
015 | |a 21,N14 |2 dnb | ||
016 | 7 | |a 1230632867 |2 DE-101 | |
020 | |a 9783863599591 |c : EUR 39.00 (DE), EUR 40.10 (AT) |9 978-3-86359-959-1 | ||
020 | |a 3863599594 |9 3-86359-959-4 | ||
024 | 3 | |a 9783863599591 | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)1249674245 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DNB1230632867 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a gw |c XA-DE-NW | ||
049 | |a DE-29T | ||
084 | |8 1\p |a 500 |2 23sdnb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bitter-Krahe, Jan |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1230831606 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments |b = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |c Jan Bitter-Krahe |
246 | 1 | 1 | |a Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
250 | |a 1. Auflage | ||
263 | |a 202104 | ||
264 | 1 | |a Aachen |b Apprimus Verlag |c 2021 | |
300 | |a X, 188 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 300 g | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
502 | |b Dissertation |c Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen |d 2020 | ||
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Multikriteria-Entscheidung |0 (DE-588)4126083-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Evaluation |0 (DE-588)4071034-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Situative Entscheidung |0 (DE-588)4219272-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Nachhaltigkeit |0 (DE-588)4326464-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | |a Sustainability | ||
653 | |a Situation | ||
653 | |a Oriented | ||
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Nachhaltigkeit |0 (DE-588)4326464-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Evaluation |0 (DE-588)4071034-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Situative Entscheidung |0 (DE-588)4219272-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Multikriteria-Entscheidung |0 (DE-588)4126083-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
710 | 2 | |a Apprimus Verlag |0 (DE-588)1068101474 |4 pbl | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m X:MVB |q text/html |u http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=19dc2b96b4ab42c4bf3433ce0d9bd052&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm |3 Inhaltstext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m DNB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032654177&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032654177 | ||
883 | 2 | |8 1\p |a dnb |d 20210329 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#dnb |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182392581128192 |
---|---|
adam_text | TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
................................................................................................................
1
1.1
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
AND
RESEARCH
SCOPE
...........................................................
1
1.2
STRUCTURE
AND
OUTLINE
OF
THE
THESIS
...................................................................
5
2
FUNDAMENTAL
CONCEPTS
AND
DELIMITATION
OF
RESEARCH
AREA
...............................
7
2.1
SUSTAINABILITY
AND
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
....................................................
7
2.1.1
TERMINOLOGY
.............................................................................................
8
2.1.2
CONCEPTS
..................................................................................................
8
2.2
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
...............................................................................
10
2.2.1
TERMINOLOGY
............................................................................................
11
2.2.2
ASSESSMENT
SITUATIONS
...........................................................................
12
2.2.3
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
................
14
2.2.4
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
......................................................................
15
2.3
EXISTING
CONCEPTS
FOR
APPROACH
SELECTION
SUPPORT
..........................................
16
2.3.1
SUPPLY-DRIVEN
CONCEPTS
..............................................................
17
2.3.2
DEMAND-DRIVEN
CONCEPTS
.....................................................................
19
2.4
MULTI-CRITERIA
DECISION-MAKING
........................................................................
21
2.5
SUMMARY
AND
THEORY-BASED
IMPLICATIONS
......................................................
23
3
INTERVIEWS
WITH
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
EXPERTS
.........................................
25
3.1
EXPERT
INTERVIEWS
.............................................................................................
25
3.1.1
INTERVIEW
SAMPLE
...................................................................................
26
3.1.2
INTERVIEW
GUIDELINE
AND
CONDUCT
..........................................................
26
3.2
INTERVIEW
EVALUATION
.........................................................................................28
3.3
RESULTS
..............................................................................................................
29
3.3.1
CONCEPT-DRIVEN
CATEGORIES
...................................................................29
3.3.2
DATA-DRIVEN
SUB-CATEGORIES
..................................................................
31
3.4
SUMMARY
AND
PRACTICAL
IMPLICATIONS
...............................................................33
4
SELECTION
PRACTICES
AND
CONCEPTUAL
REQUIREMENTS
...........................................37
4.1
SELECTION
PROCESSES
AND
CRITERIA
.....................................................................
38
4.1.1
GENERIC
SELECTION
PROCESSES
................................................................39
4.1.2
GENERAL
SELECTION
CRITERIA
......................................................................
41
4.1.3
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
FIRST
RESEARCH
QUESTION
.........................................
44
4.2
COLLECTION
OF
APPROACH
REQUIREMENTS
..............................................................45
4.3
SUMMARY
AND
CONCEPTUAL
REQUIREMENTS
........................................................47
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
5
MULTI-CRITERIA
DECISION-MAKING
FRAMEWORK
BASED
ON
FITNESS
SCORES
............
49
5.1
FRAMEWORK
ELEMENTS
AND
DEVELOPMENT
.........................................................
49
5.1.1
SYSTEMATIZATION
CRITERIA
FOR
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
........................
49
5.1.2
SPECTRA
AND
SPECIFICATIONS
OF
SYSTEMATIZATION
CRITERIA
.......................
53
5.1.3
DISTANCE-BASED
CRITERIA
FITNESS
SCORES
................................................
57
5.1.4
WEIGHTED
SUM
AGGREGATION
OF
TOTAL
FITNESS
SCORES
AND
RANKING
.......
61
5.1.5
ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY
PROCESS
FOR
SYSTEMATIC
CRITERIA
WEIGHTING
...........
63
5.2
IMPLEMENTATION
OF
FRAMEWORK
.........................................................................
64
5.2.1
DATABASE
FOR
SYSTEMATIZATION
OF
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
...............
64
5.2.2
INTERFACE
FOR
DEFINITION
OF
ASSESSMENT
SITUATION
...................................
66
5.2.3
MULTI-CRITERIA
DECISION-MAKING
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
.......................67
5.2.4
APPLICATION
OF
THE
ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY
PROCESS
....................................
68
5.2.5
TOTAL
FITNESS
SCORES
AND
PRESENTATION
OF
RESULTS
.................................70
5.3
REVIEW
AND
IMPLICATIONS
..................................................................................72
5.3.1
FULFILLMENT
OF
CONCEPTUAL
REQUIREMENTS
................................................
72
5.3.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
SECOND
RESEARCH
QUESTION
...................................74
5.4
SUMMARY
AND
OVERVIEW
OF
SELECTION
SUPPORT
CONCEPT
...................................75
6
USE
CASE,
SCENARIOS
AND
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
...............................................77
6.1
USE
CASE
AND
SCENARIOS
ON
HYDROGEN
FUEL
CELL
VEHICLES
.............................
77
6.1.1
HYDROGEN
FUEL
CELL
VEHICLES
AND
MAIN
COMPONENTS
...........................79
6.1.2
SCENARIO
1:
PREFORMING
TECHNIQUES
FOR
PRESSURE
VESSELS
..................
81
6.1.3
SCENARIO
2:
VALUE
CHAIN
OF
PRESSURE
VESSELS
.....................................83
6.1.4
SCENARIO
3:
HYDROGEN
FUEL
CELL
VEHICLES
IN
A
CIRCULAR
ECONOMY
........84
6.2
SITUATION-ORIENTED
APPROACH
SELECTION
VIA
FRAMEWORK
...................................86
6.2.1
DEFINITION
OF
ASSESSMENT
SITUATIONS
.....................................................
87
6.2.2
PROCESS
OF
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
........................................................90
6.2.3
RESULTS
AND
APPROACH
SELECTION
...........................................................93
6.2.4
VARIATION
ANALYSIS
FOR
EQUAL
WEIGHTING
...............................................
101
6.3
SUMMARY
AND
COMPARISON
OF
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
RESULTS
.....................
104
7
SYSTEMATIC
APPROACH
COMPARISON
AND
SELECTION
EFFECTS
ON
RESULTS
..........
107
7.1
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENTS
OF
SCENARIO
1
....................................................
107
7.1.1
SUSTAINABILITY
INDICATORS
AND
DATA
SET
................................................
108
7.1.2
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
WITH
FUZZY-IST
(BASE
MODEL)
.................
110
7.1.3
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
WITH
BENEFIT
OF
THE
DOUBT
........................
114
7.1.4
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
WITH
ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY
PROCESS
............
118
II
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
7.2
COMPARISON
OF
APPROACHES,
PROCESSES
AND
RESULTS
...................................
121
7.2.1
INPUTS
AND
FOUNDATIONS
.......................................................................
122
7.2.2
ASSESSMENT
PROCESSES
......................................................................
123
7.2.3
ASSESSMENT
RESULTS
.............................................................................
124
7.2.4
INTERPRETATION
OF
RESULTS
AND
DERIVATION
OF
MEASURES
.........................
128
7.2.5
REVIEW
OF
RESULTS
AND
FEEDBACK
.........................................................
129
7.3
EFFECTS
OF
APPROACH
SELECTION
ON
ASSESSMENT
RESULTS
.................................
130
7.3.1
CONSIDERATION
LEVELS
............................................................................
130
7.3.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
THIRD
RESEARCH
QUESTION
........................................
131
7.4
SUMMARY
........................................................................................................
134
8
WIDELY
FITTING
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.............................................................
135
8.1
DEMAND
AND
SUPPLY
SIDE
PERSPECTIVE
...........................................................
135
8.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
FOURTH
RESEARCH
QUESTION
.............................................
138
8.3
SUMMARY
........................................................................................................
140
9
DISCUSSION,
TRANSFER
AND
OUTLOOK
......................................................................
141
9.1
CRITICAL
DISCUSSION
..........................................................................................
141
9.1.1
EXPERT
INTERVIEWS
.................................................................................
141
9.1.2
FRAMEWORK
DEVELOPMENT
AND
IMPLEMENTATION
.................................
144
9.1.3
USE
CASE,
SCENARIOS
AND
APPLICATION
.................................................
146
9.1.4
SYSTEMATIC
APPROACH
COMPARISON
AND
EFFECTS
ON
RESULTS
...............
148
9.2
IMPLICATIONS
.....................................................................................................
148
9.2.1
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
NEW
SELECTION
SUPPORT
CONCEPT
................................
148
9.2.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
APPROACH
SELECTION
AND
ASSESSMENTS
.....................
150
9.3
TRANSFER
AND
OUTLOOK
......................................................................................
151
10
CONCLUSION
.............................................................................................................155
APPENDIX
........................................................................................................................157
A.1
APPROACH
REQUIREMENTS
FROM
LITERATURE
ANALYSIS
..........................................
157
A.
2
OVERVIEW
OF
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
...................................
158
A.3
EXPERT
INTERVIEW
SAMPLE
................................................................................
160
A.4
CATEGORIES,
SUB-CATEGORIES
AND
CODES
FROM
EXPERT
INTERVIEWS
..................
161
A.5
FINAL
SYSTEMATIZATION
CRITERIA
SET
..................................................................
163
A.6
SCREENSHOTS
OF
MICROSOFT
EXCEL
AND
VBA
DEMONSTRATOR
..........................
167
A.7
ASSESSMENT
SITUATIONS
OF
SCENARIO
2
AND
3
.................................................
171
A.8
PAIRWISE
COMPARISONS
OF
AHP
APPLICATION
FOR
SCENARIO
1
TO
3
...................
173
BIBLIOGRAPHY
.................................................................................................................175
HI
|
adam_txt |
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
.
1
1.1
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
AND
RESEARCH
SCOPE
.
1
1.2
STRUCTURE
AND
OUTLINE
OF
THE
THESIS
.
5
2
FUNDAMENTAL
CONCEPTS
AND
DELIMITATION
OF
RESEARCH
AREA
.
7
2.1
SUSTAINABILITY
AND
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
.
7
2.1.1
TERMINOLOGY
.
8
2.1.2
CONCEPTS
.
8
2.2
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
.
10
2.2.1
TERMINOLOGY
.
11
2.2.2
ASSESSMENT
SITUATIONS
.
12
2.2.3
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.
14
2.2.4
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.
15
2.3
EXISTING
CONCEPTS
FOR
APPROACH
SELECTION
SUPPORT
.
16
2.3.1
SUPPLY-DRIVEN
CONCEPTS
.
17
2.3.2
DEMAND-DRIVEN
CONCEPTS
.
19
2.4
MULTI-CRITERIA
DECISION-MAKING
.
21
2.5
SUMMARY
AND
THEORY-BASED
IMPLICATIONS
.
23
3
INTERVIEWS
WITH
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
EXPERTS
.
25
3.1
EXPERT
INTERVIEWS
.
25
3.1.1
INTERVIEW
SAMPLE
.
26
3.1.2
INTERVIEW
GUIDELINE
AND
CONDUCT
.
26
3.2
INTERVIEW
EVALUATION
.28
3.3
RESULTS
.
29
3.3.1
CONCEPT-DRIVEN
CATEGORIES
.29
3.3.2
DATA-DRIVEN
SUB-CATEGORIES
.
31
3.4
SUMMARY
AND
PRACTICAL
IMPLICATIONS
.33
4
SELECTION
PRACTICES
AND
CONCEPTUAL
REQUIREMENTS
.37
4.1
SELECTION
PROCESSES
AND
CRITERIA
.
38
4.1.1
GENERIC
SELECTION
PROCESSES
.39
4.1.2
GENERAL
SELECTION
CRITERIA
.
41
4.1.3
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
FIRST
RESEARCH
QUESTION
.
44
4.2
COLLECTION
OF
APPROACH
REQUIREMENTS
.45
4.3
SUMMARY
AND
CONCEPTUAL
REQUIREMENTS
.47
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
5
MULTI-CRITERIA
DECISION-MAKING
FRAMEWORK
BASED
ON
FITNESS
SCORES
.
49
5.1
FRAMEWORK
ELEMENTS
AND
DEVELOPMENT
.
49
5.1.1
SYSTEMATIZATION
CRITERIA
FOR
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.
49
5.1.2
SPECTRA
AND
SPECIFICATIONS
OF
SYSTEMATIZATION
CRITERIA
.
53
5.1.3
DISTANCE-BASED
CRITERIA
FITNESS
SCORES
.
57
5.1.4
WEIGHTED
SUM
AGGREGATION
OF
TOTAL
FITNESS
SCORES
AND
RANKING
.
61
5.1.5
ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY
PROCESS
FOR
SYSTEMATIC
CRITERIA
WEIGHTING
.
63
5.2
IMPLEMENTATION
OF
FRAMEWORK
.
64
5.2.1
DATABASE
FOR
SYSTEMATIZATION
OF
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.
64
5.2.2
INTERFACE
FOR
DEFINITION
OF
ASSESSMENT
SITUATION
.
66
5.2.3
MULTI-CRITERIA
DECISION-MAKING
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
.67
5.2.4
APPLICATION
OF
THE
ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY
PROCESS
.
68
5.2.5
TOTAL
FITNESS
SCORES
AND
PRESENTATION
OF
RESULTS
.70
5.3
REVIEW
AND
IMPLICATIONS
.72
5.3.1
FULFILLMENT
OF
CONCEPTUAL
REQUIREMENTS
.
72
5.3.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
SECOND
RESEARCH
QUESTION
.74
5.4
SUMMARY
AND
OVERVIEW
OF
SELECTION
SUPPORT
CONCEPT
.75
6
USE
CASE,
SCENARIOS
AND
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
.77
6.1
USE
CASE
AND
SCENARIOS
ON
HYDROGEN
FUEL
CELL
VEHICLES
.
77
6.1.1
HYDROGEN
FUEL
CELL
VEHICLES
AND
MAIN
COMPONENTS
.79
6.1.2
SCENARIO
1:
PREFORMING
TECHNIQUES
FOR
PRESSURE
VESSELS
.
81
6.1.3
SCENARIO
2:
VALUE
CHAIN
OF
PRESSURE
VESSELS
.83
6.1.4
SCENARIO
3:
HYDROGEN
FUEL
CELL
VEHICLES
IN
A
CIRCULAR
ECONOMY
.84
6.2
SITUATION-ORIENTED
APPROACH
SELECTION
VIA
FRAMEWORK
.86
6.2.1
DEFINITION
OF
ASSESSMENT
SITUATIONS
.
87
6.2.2
PROCESS
OF
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
.90
6.2.3
RESULTS
AND
APPROACH
SELECTION
.93
6.2.4
VARIATION
ANALYSIS
FOR
EQUAL
WEIGHTING
.
101
6.3
SUMMARY
AND
COMPARISON
OF
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION
RESULTS
.
104
7
SYSTEMATIC
APPROACH
COMPARISON
AND
SELECTION
EFFECTS
ON
RESULTS
.
107
7.1
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENTS
OF
SCENARIO
1
.
107
7.1.1
SUSTAINABILITY
INDICATORS
AND
DATA
SET
.
108
7.1.2
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
WITH
FUZZY-IST
(BASE
MODEL)
.
110
7.1.3
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
WITH
BENEFIT
OF
THE
DOUBT
.
114
7.1.4
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
WITH
ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY
PROCESS
.
118
II
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
7.2
COMPARISON
OF
APPROACHES,
PROCESSES
AND
RESULTS
.
121
7.2.1
INPUTS
AND
FOUNDATIONS
.
122
7.2.2
ASSESSMENT
PROCESSES
.
123
7.2.3
ASSESSMENT
RESULTS
.
124
7.2.4
INTERPRETATION
OF
RESULTS
AND
DERIVATION
OF
MEASURES
.
128
7.2.5
REVIEW
OF
RESULTS
AND
FEEDBACK
.
129
7.3
EFFECTS
OF
APPROACH
SELECTION
ON
ASSESSMENT
RESULTS
.
130
7.3.1
CONSIDERATION
LEVELS
.
130
7.3.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
THIRD
RESEARCH
QUESTION
.
131
7.4
SUMMARY
.
134
8
WIDELY
FITTING
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.
135
8.1
DEMAND
AND
SUPPLY
SIDE
PERSPECTIVE
.
135
8.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
FOURTH
RESEARCH
QUESTION
.
138
8.3
SUMMARY
.
140
9
DISCUSSION,
TRANSFER
AND
OUTLOOK
.
141
9.1
CRITICAL
DISCUSSION
.
141
9.1.1
EXPERT
INTERVIEWS
.
141
9.1.2
FRAMEWORK
DEVELOPMENT
AND
IMPLEMENTATION
.
144
9.1.3
USE
CASE,
SCENARIOS
AND
APPLICATION
.
146
9.1.4
SYSTEMATIC
APPROACH
COMPARISON
AND
EFFECTS
ON
RESULTS
.
148
9.2
IMPLICATIONS
.
148
9.2.1
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
NEW
SELECTION
SUPPORT
CONCEPT
.
148
9.2.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
APPROACH
SELECTION
AND
ASSESSMENTS
.
150
9.3
TRANSFER
AND
OUTLOOK
.
151
10
CONCLUSION
.155
APPENDIX
.157
A.1
APPROACH
REQUIREMENTS
FROM
LITERATURE
ANALYSIS
.
157
A.
2
OVERVIEW
OF
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT
APPROACHES
.
158
A.3
EXPERT
INTERVIEW
SAMPLE
.
160
A.4
CATEGORIES,
SUB-CATEGORIES
AND
CODES
FROM
EXPERT
INTERVIEWS
.
161
A.5
FINAL
SYSTEMATIZATION
CRITERIA
SET
.
163
A.6
SCREENSHOTS
OF
MICROSOFT
EXCEL
AND
VBA
DEMONSTRATOR
.
167
A.7
ASSESSMENT
SITUATIONS
OF
SCENARIO
2
AND
3
.
171
A.8
PAIRWISE
COMPARISONS
OF
AHP
APPLICATION
FOR
SCENARIO
1
TO
3
.
173
BIBLIOGRAPHY
.175
HI |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Bitter-Krahe, Jan |
author_GND | (DE-588)1230831606 |
author_facet | Bitter-Krahe, Jan |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Bitter-Krahe, Jan |
author_variant | j b k jbk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047250076 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1249674245 (DE-599)DNB1230632867 |
edition | 1. Auflage |
format | Thesis Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02533nam a22005778c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047250076</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210422s2021 gw |||| m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">21,N14</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1230632867</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783863599591</subfield><subfield code="c">: EUR 39.00 (DE), EUR 40.10 (AT)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-86359-959-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3863599594</subfield><subfield code="9">3-86359-959-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783863599591</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1249674245</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1230632867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-NW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="2">23sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bitter-Krahe, Jan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1230831606</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments</subfield><subfield code="b">= Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung</subfield><subfield code="c">Jan Bitter-Krahe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Auflage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="263" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">202104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Aachen</subfield><subfield code="b">Apprimus Verlag</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 188 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">21 cm x 14.8 cm, 300 g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Multikriteria-Entscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4126083-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071034-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Situative Entscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4219272-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nachhaltigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4326464-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sustainability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Situation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oriented</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nachhaltigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4326464-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071034-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Situative Entscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4219272-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Multikriteria-Entscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4126083-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Apprimus Verlag</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1068101474</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">X:MVB</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="u">http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=19dc2b96b4ab42c4bf3433ce0d9bd052&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltstext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032654177&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032654177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">dnb</subfield><subfield code="d">20210329</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#dnb</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV047250076 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T17:07:24Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:06:49Z |
institution | BVB |
institution_GND | (DE-588)1068101474 |
isbn | 9783863599591 3863599594 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032654177 |
oclc_num | 1249674245 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29T |
owner_facet | DE-29T |
physical | X, 188 Seiten Diagramme 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 300 g |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | Apprimus Verlag |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Bitter-Krahe, Jan Verfasser (DE-588)1230831606 aut Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung Jan Bitter-Krahe Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung 1. Auflage 202104 Aachen Apprimus Verlag 2021 X, 188 Seiten Diagramme 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 300 g txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Dissertation Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen 2020 Multikriteria-Entscheidung (DE-588)4126083-1 gnd rswk-swf Evaluation (DE-588)4071034-8 gnd rswk-swf Situative Entscheidung (DE-588)4219272-9 gnd rswk-swf Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 gnd rswk-swf Sustainability Situation Oriented (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 s Evaluation (DE-588)4071034-8 s Situative Entscheidung (DE-588)4219272-9 s Multikriteria-Entscheidung (DE-588)4126083-1 s DE-604 Apprimus Verlag (DE-588)1068101474 pbl X:MVB text/html http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=19dc2b96b4ab42c4bf3433ce0d9bd052&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm Inhaltstext DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032654177&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p dnb 20210329 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#dnb |
spellingShingle | Bitter-Krahe, Jan Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung Multikriteria-Entscheidung (DE-588)4126083-1 gnd Evaluation (DE-588)4071034-8 gnd Situative Entscheidung (DE-588)4219272-9 gnd Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4126083-1 (DE-588)4071034-8 (DE-588)4219272-9 (DE-588)4326464-5 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
title_alt | Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
title_auth | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
title_exact_search | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
title_exact_search_txtP | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
title_full | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung Jan Bitter-Krahe |
title_fullStr | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung Jan Bitter-Krahe |
title_full_unstemmed | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung Jan Bitter-Krahe |
title_short | Situation-oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments |
title_sort | situation oriented approach selection for sustainability assessments situationsorientierte auswahl von ansatzen zur nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
title_sub | = Situationsorientierte Auswahl von Ansätzen zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung |
topic | Multikriteria-Entscheidung (DE-588)4126083-1 gnd Evaluation (DE-588)4071034-8 gnd Situative Entscheidung (DE-588)4219272-9 gnd Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 gnd |
topic_facet | Multikriteria-Entscheidung Evaluation Situative Entscheidung Nachhaltigkeit Hochschulschrift |
url | http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=19dc2b96b4ab42c4bf3433ce0d9bd052&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032654177&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bitterkrahejan situationorientedapproachselectionforsustainabilityassessmentssituationsorientierteauswahlvonansatzenzurnachhaltigkeitsbewertung AT apprimusverlag situationorientedapproachselectionforsustainabilityassessmentssituationsorientierteauswahlvonansatzenzurnachhaltigkeitsbewertung AT bitterkrahejan situationsorientierteauswahlvonansatzenzurnachhaltigkeitsbewertung AT apprimusverlag situationsorientierteauswahlvonansatzenzurnachhaltigkeitsbewertung |