National security review of foreign investment: a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Abingdon, Oxon
Routledge
2020
|
| Schriftenreihe: | The rule of law in China and comparative perspectives
Rule of law in China and comparative perspectives |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2018) issued under title: National security review regimes of foreign investment : a comparative study in China, the US and the EU. Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on June 02, 2020) |
| Beschreibung: | xx, 250 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780367425159 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047110940 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210301 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210128s2020 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780367425159 |9 978-0-367-42515-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1240408362 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047110940 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 346/.092 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bian, Cheng |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1209981394 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a National security review of foreign investment |b a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union |c Cheng Bian |
| 264 | 1 | |a Abingdon, Oxon |b Routledge |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a xx, 250 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a The rule of law in China and comparative perspectives | |
| 490 | 0 | |a Rule of law in China and comparative perspectives | |
| 500 | |a Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2018) issued under title: National security review regimes of foreign investment : a comparative study in China, the US and the EU. | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on June 02, 2020) | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / China | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a National security / Law and legislation / China | |
| 650 | 4 | |a National security / Law and legislation / European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a National security / Law and legislation / United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Auslandsinvestition |0 (DE-588)4003772-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a China |0 (DE-588)4009937-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a China |0 (DE-588)4009937-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Auslandsinvestition |0 (DE-588)4003772-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-367-85322-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032517391&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032517391 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182144602341376 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Acknowledgements List of abbreviations List of legislations List offigures List of tables 1 Introduction Xll Xlll xxi xxii 1 1.1 The changing landscape of national security review offoreign direct investment (FDL) 1 1.2 An inventory of national security review regimes of EDI 2 1.2.1 China 2 1.2.2 The US 3 1.2.3 The EU 4 1.3 Juggling between protecting national security and investment protectionism 6 1.4 Achieving the regulatory goal 7 1.5 Methodology 8 1.6 Structure 10 Part I examines the theoretical conceptions and lays the foundation of this research 10 Partii conducts country-specific studies 10 Part III conducts comparison and evaluation, and concludes this research by giving policy recommendations 11 PARTI Establishing a normative framework 17 2 19 The conceptualization of national security 2.1 Introduction 19 2.2 A vernacular conceptualization 20
Contents 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Identifying national security (risks) in the FDI context 22 National security as a subject to be protected 24 The international investment law conceptualization 26 The self-determinant nature of national security concerns 28 3 The jurisprudential foundation of national security review of FDI 3.1 A public international law justification: state sovereignty 32 3.1.1 Sovereignty in the public international law context 32 3.1.2 Sovereignty in the foreign investment context 33 3.2 An international investment law justification: the right to regulate 35 3.3 Privileging the rule of law in the national security review regime 36 4 A quest for theoretical principles establishing the national security review regime of FDI 4.1 Addressing the institutional concern in national security review oj FDI 41 4.1.1 An institutional concern: politicization 41 4.1.2 The agency model as a solution 43 4.2 Reconciling conflicting in terests: the principle ofproportionality 44 4.2.1 Proportionality analysis as a tool for rights-balancing 44 4.2.2 Assuring regulatory proportionality in the national security review regime 45 4.3 The principle of non-discrimination 47 4.4 Procedural fairness: transparency, predictability and accountability 49 4.4.1 Principles of administrative law 49 4.4.2 Transparency and predictability 50 4.4.3 Accountability 51 PARTII Country-specific studies 5 The national security review regime of China 5.1 Introduction 59 5.2 FDI inflow in China and the policy context 1979-2018 60 5.3 China’s FDI regulatory regime for market access 63 5.3.1 China’s FDI
regulatory regime 1979-2013 63
Contents vii 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 6 5.3.2 China’s FDI regulatory regime in the Pilot Free Trade Zones since 2013 65 5.3.3 China’s FDI regulatory regime for market access currently applicable nationwide since 2016 67 5.3.4 The foreign investment law 68 The evolutional trajectory of China’s national security review regime 69 5.4.1 The emergence and development from 2003 to 2009 69 5.4.2 The review regime currently in effect established in 2011 71 5.4.3 The national security review regime applicable in the PFTZs 73 5.4.4 The national security review regime in the draft FIL (2015) 74 5.4.5 National security review in the FIL 75 The review framework currently effective in China 76 5.5.1 Substantive provisions 76 5.5.1.1 The review body 76 5.5.1.2 Sectors and transactions subject to review 76 5.5.1.3 Factors to be considered 77 5.5.2 Procedural provisions 78 5.5.2.1 The initiation of the procedure 78 5.5.2.2 The two-tier review proceeding 79 5.5.2.3 Review decision and implementation 79 Case study: a process in a black-box ? 80 Conclusion 81 The national security review regime of the US 6.1 Introduction 92 6.2 FDI inflow in the US and its policy context 1980-2018 93 6.3 Formation and development of the US national security review regime 96 6.3.1 Embryonic period: sectoral restrictions 96 6.3.1.1 The early stage from 1917 to 1970 96 6.3.1.2 The establishment of the CFIUS in 1975 97 6.3.2 Formation period: the Exon-Florio 97 6.3.2.1 Die Exon-Florio Amendment in 1988 97 6.3.2.2 The Byrd Amendment in 1993 99 6.3.2.3 Comments and critiques 100 6.3.3 Reformation period: FINSA in 2007 101
6.3.3.1 Legislative history 101 92
viii Contents 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.3.3.2 Major modifications 102 ó.3.3.3 Comments and critiques 104 6.3.4 The current CFIUS framework: FIRRMA in 2018 105 6.3.4.1 The legislative background 105 6.3.4.2 Major modifications 108 6.3.4.3 Future policy implications 109 The current review framework 111 6.4.1 Substantive provisions 111 6.4.1.1 The review body 111 6.4.1.2 Sectors offocus 112 6.4.1.3 Transactions subject to review 113 6.4.1.4 Factors to be considered 115 6.4.2 Procedural provisions 116 6.4.2.1 The pre-notice consultation 116 6A.2.2 The notice 116 6.4.2.3 The 45-day review 117 6.4.2A The 45(+15)-day investigation 117 6.4.2.5 Actions by the President 118 6.4.2.6 The withdrawal and the resubmission of the notification 118 6.4.2.7 The mitigation 119 6.4.2.8 Supervision by the Congress 119 6A.2.9 The safe harbour and the evergreen provision 120 6.4.2.10 The CFIUS fund 121 Cases and comments 121 6.5.1 Fujitsu Ltd - Fairchild Semiconductor Corp 121 6.5.2 Thomson CSF - LTV Corporation’s missile division 122 6.5.3 CNOOC - Unocal 123 6.5.4 Dubai Ports World - Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co 124 6.5.5 Huawei - 3Com and Huawei - 3Leaf 125 6.5.6 Ralls-Terna 126 The CFIUS clearance patterns in practice and the rationale behind 128 6.6.1 Covered transactions and withdrawals 128 6.6.2 Covered transactions by country 130 6.6.3 A reformed CFIUS to address China-specific concerns? 132 Conclusion 134
Contents їх 7 The national security review regimes in the EU 152 7.1 Introduction 152 7.2 The strictures of the EU law 153 7.2.1 Introduction 153 7.2.2 The free movement of capital - Article 63 (1 ) TFEU 154 7.2.3 The direct control· of EDI on the EU level 155 7.2.4 Legitimate derogations to the free movement of capital in the TFEU 157 7.2.4.1 Public policy or public security 157 7.2.4.2 Prudential measures 158 7.2.4.3 Third-country restrictions 158 7.2.4.4 Other exceptions stipulated in the TFEU 159 7.2.5 Legitimate derogations to the free movement of capital in the ECJjurisprudence - the general interest 159 7.2.6 The EU regulation screening foreign direct investment 159 7.2.6.1 The legislative background 159 7.2.6.2 The regulatory framework 160 7.2.6.3 Future policy implications to different stakeholders 161 7.3 The national security review regime of Germany 164 7.3.1 Introduction 164 7.3.2 Substantial provisions 167 7.3.2.1 The review body 167 7.3.2.2 Sectors and transactions subject to review 167 7.3.2.3 Criteria for evaluation 168 7.3.3 Procedural provisions 169 7.3.3.1 The cross-sectoral review procedure 169 7.3.3.2 The sector-specific review procedure 172 7.3.3.3 Judicial review 172 7.3.4 The compatibility beween EU law strictures and the German review regime 172 7.4 Conclusion 174 PART III Comparison, conclusions, and recommendations 183 8 185 Revealing similarities and differences 8.1 Introduction 185 8.2 Comparison ofsubstantive attributes 185
x Contents 8.2.1 The subject to be protected 185 8.2.2 Transactions and sectors subject to review 187 8.2.3 Factors to be considered 190 8.3 Comparison ofprocedural attributes 192 8.3.1 The review body 192 8.3.2 The review procedure 195 9 An evaluation to the comparative results 200 9.1 Evaluation of substantive attributes 200 9.1.1 The subject to be protected 200 9.1.2 Transactions and sectors subject to review 201 9.1.3 Factors to be considered 203 9.2 Evaluation ofprocedural attributes 204 9.2.1 The review body 204 9.2.2 The review procedure 205 9.3 Conclusion 207 10 Conclusions and policy recommendations 10.1 Conclusions 210 10.1.1 A tendency towards tightened and heightened national security review regimes 210 10.1.2 National security-related concerns are self-determinant 211 10.1.3 National security review regimes are legitimate regulation justified by state sovereignty 213 10.1.4 National security review regimes are investmentrestrictive-measures and are prone to protectionism if abused by the host state 213 10.1.5 National security review regimes should comply with the rule of law in order to achieve the regulatory goal 215 10.2 Folky recommendations: a proposition of a normative framework establishing the national security review regime 216 10.2.1 National security review regimes should adhere to proportionality 216 10.2.2 The use of rules of thumb in the scope of review 218 10.2.3 The sectors subject to the national security review should be confined to the public sector 220 10.2.4 The review body should be established assimilating the agency model 223 210
10.2.5 The review procedure should enhance transparency and maximize predictability 226 10.2.6 The national security review regime should guarantee accountability 228 10.3 Concluding remarks 229 Selected bibliography Index
|
| adam_txt |
Contents Acknowledgements List of abbreviations List of legislations List offigures List of tables 1 Introduction Xll Xlll xxi xxii 1 1.1 The changing landscape of national security review offoreign direct investment (FDL) 1 1.2 An inventory of national security review regimes of EDI 2 1.2.1 China 2 1.2.2 The US 3 1.2.3 The EU 4 1.3 Juggling between protecting national security and investment protectionism 6 1.4 Achieving the regulatory goal 7 1.5 Methodology 8 1.6 Structure 10 Part I examines the theoretical conceptions and lays the foundation of this research 10 Partii conducts country-specific studies 10 Part III conducts comparison and evaluation, and concludes this research by giving policy recommendations 11 PARTI Establishing a normative framework 17 2 19 The conceptualization of national security 2.1 Introduction 19 2.2 A vernacular conceptualization 20
Contents 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Identifying national security (risks) in the FDI context 22 National security as a subject to be protected 24 The international investment law conceptualization 26 The self-determinant nature of national security concerns 28 3 The jurisprudential foundation of national security review of FDI 3.1 A public international law justification: state sovereignty 32 3.1.1 Sovereignty in the public international law context 32 3.1.2 Sovereignty in the foreign investment context 33 3.2 An international investment law justification: the right to regulate 35 3.3 Privileging the rule of law in the national security review regime 36 4 A quest for theoretical principles establishing the national security review regime of FDI 4.1 Addressing the institutional concern in national security review oj'FDI 41 4.1.1 An institutional concern: politicization 41 4.1.2 The agency model as a solution 43 4.2 Reconciling conflicting in terests: the principle ofproportionality 44 4.2.1 Proportionality analysis as a tool for rights-balancing 44 4.2.2 Assuring regulatory proportionality in the national security review regime 45 4.3 The principle of non-discrimination 47 4.4 Procedural fairness: transparency, predictability and accountability 49 4.4.1 Principles of administrative law 49 4.4.2 Transparency and predictability 50 4.4.3 Accountability 51 PARTII Country-specific studies 5 The national security review regime of China 5.1 Introduction 59 5.2 FDI inflow in China and the policy context 1979-2018 60 5.3 China’s FDI regulatory regime for market access 63 5.3.1 China’s FDI
regulatory regime 1979-2013 63
Contents vii 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 6 5.3.2 China’s FDI regulatory regime in the Pilot Free Trade Zones since 2013 65 5.3.3 China’s FDI regulatory regime for market access currently applicable nationwide since 2016 67 5.3.4 The foreign investment law 68 The evolutional trajectory of China’s national security review regime 69 5.4.1 The emergence and development from 2003 to 2009 69 5.4.2 The review regime currently in effect established in 2011 71 5.4.3 The national security review regime applicable in the PFTZs 73 5.4.4 The national security review regime in the draft FIL (2015) 74 5.4.5 National security review in the FIL 75 The review framework currently effective in China 76 5.5.1 Substantive provisions 76 5.5.1.1 The review body 76 5.5.1.2 Sectors and transactions subject to review 76 5.5.1.3 Factors to be considered 77 5.5.2 Procedural provisions 78 5.5.2.1 The initiation of the procedure 78 5.5.2.2 The two-tier review proceeding 79 5.5.2.3 Review decision and implementation 79 Case study: a process in a black-box'? 80 Conclusion 81 The national security review regime of the US 6.1 Introduction 92 6.2 FDI inflow in the US and its policy context 1980-2018 93 6.3 Formation and development of the US national security review regime 96 6.3.1 Embryonic period: sectoral restrictions 96 6.3.1.1 The early stage from 1917 to 1970 96 6.3.1.2 The establishment of the CFIUS in 1975 97 6.3.2 Formation period: the Exon-Florio 97 6.3.2.1 Die Exon-Florio Amendment in 1988 97 6.3.2.2 The Byrd Amendment in 1993 99 6.3.2.3 Comments and critiques 100 6.3.3 Reformation period: FINSA in 2007 101
6.3.3.1 Legislative history 101 92
viii Contents 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.3.3.2 Major modifications 102 ó.3.3.3 Comments and critiques 104 6.3.4 The current CFIUS framework: FIRRMA in 2018 105 6.3.4.1 The legislative background 105 6.3.4.2 Major modifications 108 6.3.4.3 Future policy implications 109 The current review framework 111 6.4.1 Substantive provisions 111 6.4.1.1 The review body 111 6.4.1.2 Sectors offocus 112 6.4.1.3 Transactions subject to review 113 6.4.1.4 Factors to be considered 115 6.4.2 Procedural provisions 116 6.4.2.1 The pre-notice consultation 116 6A.2.2 The notice 116 6.4.2.3 The 45-day review 117 6.4.2A The 45(+15)-day investigation 117 6.4.2.5 Actions by the President 118 6.4.2.6 The withdrawal and the resubmission of the notification 118 6.4.2.7 The mitigation 119 6.4.2.8 Supervision by the Congress 119 6A.2.9 The safe harbour and the evergreen provision 120 6.4.2.10 The CFIUS fund 121 Cases and comments 121 6.5.1 Fujitsu Ltd - Fairchild Semiconductor Corp 121 6.5.2 Thomson CSF - LTV Corporation’s missile division 122 6.5.3 CNOOC - Unocal 123 6.5.4 Dubai Ports World - Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co 124 6.5.5 Huawei - 3Com and Huawei - 3Leaf 125 6.5.6 Ralls-Terna 126 The CFIUS clearance patterns in practice and the rationale behind 128 6.6.1 Covered transactions and withdrawals 128 6.6.2 Covered transactions by country 130 6.6.3 A reformed CFIUS to address China-specific concerns? 132 Conclusion 134
Contents їх 7 The national security review regimes in the EU 152 7.1 Introduction 152 7.2 The strictures of the EU law 153 7.2.1 Introduction 153 7.2.2 The free movement of capital - Article 63 (1 ) TFEU 154 7.2.3 The direct control· of EDI on the EU level 155 7.2.4 Legitimate derogations to the free movement of capital in the TFEU 157 7.2.4.1 Public policy or public security 157 7.2.4.2 Prudential measures 158 7.2.4.3 Third-country restrictions 158 7.2.4.4 Other exceptions stipulated in the TFEU 159 7.2.5 Legitimate derogations to the free movement of capital in the ECJjurisprudence - the general interest 159 7.2.6 The EU regulation screening foreign direct investment 159 7.2.6.1 The legislative background 159 7.2.6.2 The regulatory framework 160 7.2.6.3 Future policy implications to different stakeholders 161 7.3 The national security review regime of Germany 164 7.3.1 Introduction 164 7.3.2 Substantial provisions 167 7.3.2.1 The review body 167 7.3.2.2 Sectors and transactions subject to review 167 7.3.2.3 Criteria for evaluation 168 7.3.3 Procedural provisions 169 7.3.3.1 The cross-sectoral review procedure 169 7.3.3.2 The sector-specific review procedure 172 7.3.3.3 Judicial review 172 7.3.4 The compatibility beween EU law strictures and the German review regime 172 7.4 Conclusion 174 PART III Comparison, conclusions, and recommendations 183 8 185 Revealing similarities and differences 8.1 Introduction 185 8.2 Comparison ofsubstantive attributes 185
x Contents 8.2.1 The subject to be protected 185 8.2.2 Transactions and sectors subject to review 187 8.2.3 Factors to be considered 190 8.3 Comparison ofprocedural attributes 192 8.3.1 The review body 192 8.3.2 The review procedure 195 9 An evaluation to the comparative results 200 9.1 Evaluation of substantive attributes 200 9.1.1 The subject to be protected 200 9.1.2 Transactions and sectors subject to review 201 9.1.3 Factors to be considered 203 9.2 Evaluation ofprocedural attributes 204 9.2.1 The review body 204 9.2.2 The review procedure 205 9.3 Conclusion 207 10 Conclusions and policy recommendations 10.1 Conclusions 210 10.1.1 A tendency towards tightened and heightened national security review regimes 210 10.1.2 National security-related concerns are self-determinant 211 10.1.3 National security review regimes are legitimate regulation justified by state sovereignty 213 10.1.4 National security review regimes are investmentrestrictive-measures and are prone to protectionism if abused by the host state 213 10.1.5 National security review regimes should comply with the rule of law in order to achieve the regulatory goal 215 10.2 Folky recommendations: a proposition of a normative framework establishing the national security review regime 216 10.2.1 National security review regimes should adhere to proportionality 216 10.2.2 The use of rules of thumb in the scope of review 218 10.2.3 The sectors subject to the national security review should be confined to the public sector 220 10.2.4 The review body should be established assimilating the agency model 223 210
10.2.5 The review procedure should enhance transparency and maximize predictability 226 10.2.6 The national security review regime should guarantee accountability 228 10.3 Concluding remarks 229 Selected bibliography Index |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Bian, Cheng |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1209981394 |
| author_facet | Bian, Cheng |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bian, Cheng |
| author_variant | c b cb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047110940 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1240408362 (DE-599)BVBBV047110940 |
| dewey-full | 346/.092 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 346 - Private law |
| dewey-raw | 346/.092 |
| dewey-search | 346/.092 |
| dewey-sort | 3346 292 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02927nam a2200589zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047110940</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210301 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210128s2020 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780367425159</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-367-42515-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1240408362</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047110940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346/.092</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bian, Cheng</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1209981394</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National security review of foreign investment</subfield><subfield code="b">a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union</subfield><subfield code="c">Cheng Bian</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Abingdon, Oxon</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xx, 250 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The rule of law in China and comparative perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rule of law in China and comparative perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2018) issued under title: National security review regimes of foreign investment : a comparative study in China, the US and the EU.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on June 02, 2020)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security / Law and legislation / China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security / Law and legislation / European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security / Law and legislation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslandsinvestition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003772-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009937-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009937-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Auslandsinvestition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003772-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-367-85322-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032517391&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032517391</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd China (DE-588)4009937-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA China |
| id | DE-604.BV047110940 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T16:26:23Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:02:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780367425159 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032517391 |
| oclc_num | 1240408362 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-384 |
| physical | xx, 250 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | The rule of law in China and comparative perspectives Rule of law in China and comparative perspectives |
| spelling | Bian, Cheng Verfasser (DE-588)1209981394 aut National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union Cheng Bian Abingdon, Oxon Routledge 2020 xx, 250 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The rule of law in China and comparative perspectives Rule of law in China and comparative perspectives Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2018) issued under title: National security review regimes of foreign investment : a comparative study in China, the US and the EU. Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on June 02, 2020) Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / China Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / European Union countries Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / United States National security / Law and legislation / China National security / Law and legislation / European Union countries National security / Law and legislation / United States Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 gnd rswk-swf Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf China (DE-588)4009937-4 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content China (DE-588)4009937-4 g USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 s Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-367-85322-8 Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032517391&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Bian, Cheng National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / China Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / European Union countries Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / United States National security / Law and legislation / China National security / Law and legislation / European Union countries National security / Law and legislation / United States Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4003772-1 (DE-588)4116489-1 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4009937-4 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union |
| title_auth | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union |
| title_exact_search | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union |
| title_exact_search_txtP | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union |
| title_full | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union Cheng Bian |
| title_fullStr | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union Cheng Bian |
| title_full_unstemmed | National security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union Cheng Bian |
| title_short | National security review of foreign investment |
| title_sort | national security review of foreign investment a comparative legal analysis of china the united states and the european union |
| title_sub | a comparative legal analysis of China, the United States and the European Union |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / China Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / European Union countries Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / United States National security / Law and legislation / China National security / Law and legislation / European Union countries National security / Law and legislation / United States Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / China Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / European Union countries Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation / United States National security / Law and legislation / China National security / Law and legislation / European Union countries National security / Law and legislation / United States Auslandsinvestition Sicherheitspolitik Rechtsvergleich USA China Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032517391&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT biancheng nationalsecurityreviewofforeigninvestmentacomparativelegalanalysisofchinatheunitedstatesandtheeuropeanunion |