Normalizing corruption: failures of accountability in Ukraine
"Accountability is a crucial feature of every successful democratic system, and the failure to develop functioning mechanisms of accountability has undermined democratic consolidation efforts worldwide. This book advances the idea that reliable tools to hold officials accountable are essential...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Ann Arbor
University of Michigan Press
2020
|
Schriftenreihe: | Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies series
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register |
Zusammenfassung: | "Accountability is a crucial feature of every successful democratic system, and the failure to develop functioning mechanisms of accountability has undermined democratic consolidation efforts worldwide. This book advances the idea that reliable tools to hold officials accountable are essential for democratic governance and that one of the key threats to accountability comes from corrupt practices, especially when they are integrated - or normalized - in the day-to-day activities of institutions. It evaluates the successes and failures of institutions, politicians, political parties, bureaucracies, and civil society by focusing on the experiences of contemporary Ukraine. While the book details the case of Ukraine, the topic is directly relevant for countries that have experienced democratic backsliding and those that are at risk. Normalizing Corruption addresses several interconnected questions about the development of accountability in its chapters: Under what circumstances do incumbents lose elections? How well do party organizations encourage cohesive behavior? Is executive authority responsive to inquiries from public organizations and other government institutions? How can citizens influence government actions? Do civil servants conduct their duties as impartial professionals, or are they beholden to other interests? The research builds upon extensive fieldwork, data collection, and data analysis conducted since 1999"-- |
Beschreibung: | x, 225 Seiten Illustrationen, Karte |
ISBN: | 9780472132140 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047091917 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20230320 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 210118s2020 a||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780472132140 |c hbk. |9 978-0-472-13214-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1238068518 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047091917 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-11 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a MG 82080 |0 (DE-625)122865:12045 |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a MD 7200 |0 (DE-625)122538: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Herron, Erik S. |d 1968- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1159541671 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Normalizing corruption |b failures of accountability in Ukraine |c Erik S. Herron |
264 | 1 | |a Ann Arbor |b University of Michigan Press |c 2020 | |
300 | |a x, 225 Seiten |b Illustrationen, Karte | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies series | |
520 | 3 | |a "Accountability is a crucial feature of every successful democratic system, and the failure to develop functioning mechanisms of accountability has undermined democratic consolidation efforts worldwide. This book advances the idea that reliable tools to hold officials accountable are essential for democratic governance and that one of the key threats to accountability comes from corrupt practices, especially when they are integrated - or normalized - in the day-to-day activities of institutions. It evaluates the successes and failures of institutions, politicians, political parties, bureaucracies, and civil society by focusing on the experiences of contemporary Ukraine. While the book details the case of Ukraine, the topic is directly relevant for countries that have experienced democratic backsliding and those that are at risk. Normalizing Corruption addresses several interconnected questions about the development of accountability in its chapters: Under what circumstances do incumbents lose elections? How well do party organizations encourage cohesive behavior? Is executive authority responsive to inquiries from public organizations and other government institutions? How can citizens influence government actions? Do civil servants conduct their duties as impartial professionals, or are they beholden to other interests? The research builds upon extensive fieldwork, data collection, and data analysis conducted since 1999"-- | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verwaltung |0 (DE-588)4063317-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verantwortlichkeit |0 (DE-588)4187523-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Zivilgesellschaft |0 (DE-588)7668631-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Korruption |0 (DE-588)4032524-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
653 | 0 | |a Government accountability / Ukraine | |
653 | 0 | |a Political corruption / Ukraine | |
653 | 0 | |a Democratization / Ukraine | |
653 | 2 | |a Ukraine / Politics and government / 1991- | |
653 | 0 | |a Democratization | |
653 | 0 | |a Government accountability | |
653 | 0 | |a Political corruption | |
653 | 0 | |a Politics and government | |
653 | 2 | |a Ukraine | |
653 | 4 | |a Since 1991 | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Korruption |0 (DE-588)4032524-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Verwaltung |0 (DE-588)4063317-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Zivilgesellschaft |0 (DE-588)7668631-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 5 | |a Verantwortlichkeit |0 (DE-588)4187523-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, ebk |z 978-0-472-12714-6 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20210312 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032498453 | ||
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 477 |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 351.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 477 |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 477 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182110448123904 |
---|---|
adam_text | CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii List of Tables xi List of Figures xiii Introduction 1. How Accountability Works 1 7 2. Politics and the Struggle with Corruption 22 3. Vertical Accountability 44 4. Horizontal Accountability 80 5. Diagonal Accountability 102 6. Strategic Misrepresentation and Accountability 123 7. Wealth and Accountability 148 8. Conclusion 168 Notes 189 Bibliography 205 Index 221 Digital materials related to this title can be found on the Fulcrum platform via the following citable URL: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub. 11596348
BIBLIOGRAPHY Aberbach, Joel. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye. Washington, DC: Brookings Institu tion Press. Adams, J., M. Clark, L. Ezrow, and G. Glasgow. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamen tally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Conse quences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 513-29. Adsera, Alicia, Carles Boix, and Mark Payne. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government!’ Journal ofLaw, Economics, Ժ Or ganization 19 (2): 445-90. Aidt, Toke. 2003. “Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey.” Economic Jour nalin (491): 632-52. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation ofPolitical Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Andeweg, Rudy B. 1992. “Executive-Legislative Relations in the Netherlands: Con secutive and Coexisting Patterns.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (2): 161-82. Andrews, Josephine T., and Robert W. Jackman. 2005. “Strategic Fools: Electoral Rules Choice Under Extreme Uncertainty.” Electoral Studies 24:65-84. Argersinger, Peter H. 1985-1986. “New Perspectives on Election Fraud in the Gilded Age.” Political Science Quarterly 100 (4): 669-87. Armantier, Olivier, and Amadou Boly. 2011. “A Controlled Field Experiment on Corruption.” European Economic Review 55 (8): 1072-82. Ashworth, Scott, and Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. 2006. “Delivering the Goods: Leg islative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings.” Journal ofPolitics 68 (1): 168-79. Aslund, Anders. 2005. “Comparative
Oligarchy: Russia, Ukraine and the United States.” Center for Social and Economic Research, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.1441910 Aslund, Anders. 2014. “Oligarchs, Corruption, and European Integration.” Journal ofDemocracy 25 (3): 64-73. Atkinson, Michael M., and Kim Richard Nossal. 1980. “Executive Power and Com mittee Autonomy in the Canadian House of Commons: Leadership Selection, 1968-1979.” Canadian Journal ofPolitical Science t Revue canadienne de science politique 13 (2): 287-308. 205
206 BIBLIOGRAPHY Auers, Daunis. 2015. Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States. Lon don: Paigrave Macmillan. Ball, Nicole. 2005. “Strengthening Democratic Governance of the Security Sector in Conflict-Affected Countries.” Public Administration Development 25 (1): 2538. Barrington, Lowell, Erik S. Herron, and Brian D. Silver. 2003. “The Motherland Is Calling: Views of Homeland Among Russians in the Near Abroad.” World Poli tics 55 (January): 290-313. Beal, Amanda L., and Leah Graham. 2014. “Foundations for Change: Rule of Law, Development, and Democratization.” Politics Policy 42 (3): 311-45. Beber, Bernd, and Alexandra Scacco. 2012. “What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud.” Political Analysis 20: 211-34. Beissinger, Mark R. 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenom ena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (2): 259-76. Beissinger, Mark R. 2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 57492. Bensel, Richard Franklin. 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Birch, Sarah. 1997. “Nomenklatura Democratization: Electoral Clientelism in PostSoviet Ukraine.” Democratization 4 (4): 40-62. Birch, Sarah. 2000. Elections and Democratization in Ukraine. New York: St. Mar tin’s Press. Birch, Sarah. 2008. “Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Pro cesses: A Cross-National Analysis.” Electoral Studies 27 (2): 305-20.
Birch, Sarah. 2012. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birch, Sarah, and Andrew Wilson. 1999. “The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections of 1998.” Electoral Studies 18: 276-82. Bojcun, Marko. 1995. “The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections in March-April 1994.” Europe-Asia Studies 47 (2): 229-49. Borowiak, Craig T. 2011. Accountability and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bovens, Mark. 2007a. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Review 13 (4): 447-68. Bovens, Mark. 2007b. “New Forms of Accountability and EU-Governance.” Com parative European Politics 5:104-20. Boyko, Nazar, and Erik S. Herron. 2015. “The Effects of Technical Parties and Par tisan Election Management Bodies on Voting Outcomes.” Electoral Studies 40 (December): 23-33. Boyko, Nazar, Erik S. Herron, and Roman Sverdan. 2014. “Administration and Management of Ukraine’s 2014 Presidential Election: A Systematic and Spatial Analysis.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55 (3): 286-306. Brown, Trevor L., and Charles R. Wise. 2004. “Constitutional Courts and Legislative-
BIBLIOGRAPHY 207 Executive Relations: The Case of Ukraine.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (1): 143-69. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic ofPolitical Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bunce, Valerie J., and Sharon L. Wolchik. 2006. “International Diffusion and Post communist Electoral Revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39 (3): 283-304. Buzin, A. Yu., and A. E. Lyubarev. 2008. Prestuplenie hez nakazaniya: Administra tivnye tekhnologii federaľnykh výborov 2007-2008 godov. Moscow: Nikkolo M. Cain, Bruce E„ John A. Ferejohn, et al. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Ser vice and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Callahan, William A., and Duncan McCargo. 1996. “Vote-Buying in Thailand’s Northeast: The July 1995 General Election.” Asian Survey 36 (4): 376-92. Campbell, Robert W. 1991. The Socialist Economies in Transition. Bloomington: In diana University Press. Campbell, Tracy. 2005. Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, An American Political Tradition (1742-2004). New York: Carroll and Graf. Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carey, John M. 2018. “Electoral System Design in New Democracies.” In Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, eds., Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carey, John M., and Matthew S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4):
417-39. Carothers, Thomas. 1997. “The Observers Observed.” Journal of Democracy 8 (3): 17-31. Carson, George B., Jr. 1955. Electoral Practices in the USSR. New York: Frederick A. Praeger. Chaisty, Paul, and Svitlana Chernykh. 2015. “Coalitional Presidentialism and Legislative Control in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31 (3): 177200. Clarke, Harold D. 1978. “Determinants of Provincial Constituency Service Behav iour: A Multivariate Analysis.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 3 (4): 601-28. Clarke, Harold D., Richard G. Price, et al. 1975. “Constituency Service among Ca nadian Provincial Legislators: Basic Findings and a Test of Three Hypotheses.” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique 8 (4): 520-42. Colomer, Josep M. 2018. “Party System Effects on Electoral Systems.” In Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, eds., Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) 1992. The December 1, 1991 Referendum/Presidential Election in Ukraine, https://www.csce.gov/ sites/helsinkicommission.house.gov/files/120191UkraineReferendum.pdf (ac cessed online on March 26,2018).
208 BIBLIOGRAPHY Cox, Gary, and J. M. Kousser. 1981. “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 25 (4): 646-63. Cox, Gary, and Matthew McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Govern ment in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cox, Homersham. 1868 [2005]. Antient [sic] Parliamentary Election. London: Elibron Classics. Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press. D’Anieri, Paul, Robert Kravchuk, and Taras Kuzio. 1999. Politics and Society in Ukraine. Boulder: Westview Press. Denk, Thomas, and Daniel Silander. 2011. “Problems in Paradise? Challenges to Future Democratization in Democratic States.” International Political Science Review 33 (1): 25-40. DeVries, Catherine E., and Hector Solaz. 2017. “The Electoral Consequences of Corruption.” Annual Review ofPolitical Science 20:391-408. Diaby, Aboubacar, and Kevin Sylwester. 2014. “Bureaucratic Competition and Pub lic Corruption: Evidence from Transition Countries.” European Journal of Po litical Economy 35: 75-87. Di Puppo, Lili. 2014. “The Construction of Success in Anti-Corruption Activity in Georgia.” East European Politics 30 (1): 105-22. Diuk, Nadia. 2013. “Youth as an Agent for Change: The Next Generation in Ukraine.” Demokratizatisya 21 (2): 179-96. Diuk, Nadia. 2014. “Euromaidan: Ukraine’s Self-Organizing Revolution.” World Af fairs 176 (6): 9-16. Djilas, Milovan. 1957. The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. New York: Praeger. Dobryninas, Alexandras. 2005. “Lithuania’s Anti-
Corruption Policy: Between ‘East’ and ‘West.”’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 11: 77-95. Doig, Alan. 2006-2007. “Not as Easy as It Sounds? Delivering the National Integrity System Approach in Practice: The Case Study of the National Anti-Corruption Programme in Lithuania.” Public Administration Quarterly 30 (3/4): 273-313. Dollar, David, Raymond Fishman, and Roberta Gatti. 2001. “Are Women Really the “Fairer” Sex? Corruption and Women in Government.” Journal ofEconomic Be havior Organization 46 (4): 423-29. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory ofDemocracy. New York· Harper. Easter, Gerald. 2000. Reconstructing the State: Personal Networks and Elite Identity in Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elster, Jon. 1999. “Accountability in Athenian Politics.” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representa tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engvall, Johan. 2012. “Against the Grain: How Georgia Fought Corruption and What It Means.” Silk Road Paper. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hop kins University. Engvall, Johan. 2015. “The State as Investment Market: A Framework for Interpret ing the Post-Soviet State in Eurasia.” Governance 28 (1): 25-40.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 209 Engvall, Johan. 2015. The State as Investment Market: Kyrgyzstan in Comparative Perspective. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. Epstein, Leon D. 1980 [2000]. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Bruns wick Transaction. Ethridge, Marcus E. 1984. “A Political-Institutional Interpretation of Legislative Oversight Mechanisms and Behavior.” Polity 17 (2): 340-59. European Commission. 2014. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: EU Anti-Corruption Report. Brussels: European Com mission. Federal Election Commission. 1990.1990 U.S. Election Study Tour of the Central Electoral Commission of the U.S.S.R. FEC: Washington, DC. Mimeo. Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability.” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ferguson, Gary A. 1999. Public Opinion in Ukraine 1999. Washington, DC: IFES. Ferrara, Federico, Erik S. Herron, and Misa Nishikawa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Sys tems: Contamination and its Consequences. New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Fisun, Oleksandr. 2016. “Ukrainian Constitutional Politics: Neopatrimonialism, Rent-seeking, and Regime Change.” In Henry Hale and Robert Orttung, eds., Beyond Euromaidan: Comparative Perspectives on Advancing Reform in Ukraine. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Friedman, John N„ and Richard T. Holden. 2009. “The Rising Incumbent Reelec tion Rate: What’s Gerrymandering Got to Do with It?” Journal ofPolitics 71 (2):
593-611. Frye, Timothy, Joel Heilman, et al. 2000. “Data Base on Political Institutions in the Post-Communist World.” Ohio State University. Frye, Timothy, Ora John Reuter, and David Szakonyi. 2014. “Political Machines at Work Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66 (2): 195-228. Fukuyama, Francis. 2013. “What Is Governance?” Governance 26 (3): 347-68. Gailmard, Sean, and John W. Patty. 2007. “Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 873-89. Gallagher, Mary E„ and Jonathan K. Hanson. 2015. “Power Tool or Dull Blade: Selectorate Theory for Autocracies.” Annual Review ofPolitical Science 18:367-85. Gans-Morse, Jordan, Mariana Borges, Alexey Makarin, Theresa Mannah-Blankson, Andre Nicków, and Dong Zhang. 2018. “Reducing Bureaucratic Corruption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on What Works.” World Development 105:171֊ 88. Gehlbach, S., K. Sonin, and E. Zhuravskaya. 2010 “Businessman Candidates.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 54,718-36. Gleason, Gregory. 1990. “Nationalism or Organized Crime? The Case of the ‘Cotton Scandal’ in the USSR.” Corruption and Reform 5 (2): 87-108. Goetz, Anne Marie, and Rob Jenkins. 2001. “Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citi-
210 BIBLIOGRAPHY zen Engagement in Institutions of Public-Sector Oversight in India.” Public Management Review 3 (3): 363-83. Gregory, Paul R., and Robert C. Stuart. 1986. Soviet Economic Structure and Perfor mance. New York: Harper and Row. Gugushvili, Dimitri. 2017. “Lessons from Georgia’s Neoliberal Experiment: A Ris ing Tide Does Not Necessarily Lift All Boats.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50:1-14. Guriev, S., and A. Rachinsky. 2005, “The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism.” Journal ofEconomic Perspectives 19(1): 131-50. Gylfason, Thorvaldur, and Eduard Hochreiter. 2009. “Growing Apart? A Tale of Two Republics: Estonia and Georgia.” European Journal ofPolitical Economy 25: 355-70. Hale, Henry E. 2015. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hale, Henry E., and Robert W. Orttung, eds. 2016. Beyond the Euromaidan: Com parative Perspectives on Advancing Reform in Ukraine. Stanford: Stanford Uni versity Press. Hall, Thad E. 2018. “Election Administration.” In Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pe kkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, eds., Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Halligan, John, Robert Krause, et al. 1988. “Constituency Service among SubNational Legislators in Australia and Canada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1): 49-63. Hazan, Reuven Y. 1997. “Executive-Legislative Relations in an Era of Accelerated Reform: Reshaping Government in Israel.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (3): 329-50. Heitshusen, Valerie, Garry Young, et al. 2005. “Electoral
Context and MP Constitu ency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United King dom.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 49 (1): 32-45. Heilman, J. S., G. Jones, and D. Kaufmann. 2003. “Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture and Influence in Transition Economies.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (4): 251-73. Helms, Ludger, ed. 2009. Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies. London: Routledge. Herron, Erik S. 1999. “Democratization and the Development of Information Re gimes: The Internet in Eurasia and the Baltics.” Problems of Post-Communism 46 (July-August): 56-68. Herron, Erik S. 2002. “Causes and Consequences of Fluid Faction Membership in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (4): 625-39. Herron, Erik S. 2003. “Election Fraud and Manipulation: Central Asia in Compara tive Perspective.” Journal of Central Asian Studies 8 (Fall/Winter): 2-16. Herron, Erik S. 2009. Elections and Democracy After Communism? New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Herron, Erik S. 2011a. “How Viktor Yanukovych Won: Reassessing the Dominant
BIBLIOGRAPHY 211 Narratives of Ukraine’s 2010 Presidential Election.” East European Politics and Societies 25 (February): 47-67. Herron, Erik S. 2011b. “Measuring Dissent in Electoral Authoritarian Societies: Lessons from Azerbaijan’s 2008 Presidential Election and 2009 Referendum.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (November): 1557-83. Herron, Erik S., and Nazar Boyko. 2012. “Reversing Democratic Revolutions: The Implications of Ukraine’s 2010 Local Elections.” Journal of East European and Asian Studies 3 (1): 79-100. Herron, Erik S., and Nazar Boyko. 2015. “Horizontal Accountability during Politi cal Transition: The Use of Deputy Requests in Ukraine, 2002-2006.” Party Politicsii (1): 131-42. Herron, Erik S., and Nazar Boyko. 2016. “Conducting Credible Elections Under Threat: Results from a Survey of Election Administrators.” Election Law Journal 15 (4): 285-301. Herron, Erik S., Nazar Boyko, and Michael Thunberg. 2017. “Serving Two Masters: Professionalization Vs. Corruption in Ukraine’s Election Administration.” Gov ernance 30 (4): 601-19. Herron, Erik S., Brian Fitzpatrick, and Maksym Palamarenko. 2019. “The Practice and Implications of Legislative Proxy Voting in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 35 (1): 41-62. Herron, Erik S., and Paul E. Johnson. 2008. “Fraud Before the ‘Revolution’: Special Precincts in Ukraine’s 2002 Parliamentary Election.” In Ingmar Bredies, Valen tin Yakushik, and Andreas Umland, eds., Aspects of the Orange Revolution III: The Context and Dynamics of the 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Elections. Stutt gart: ibidem-Verlag. Herron, Erik S., and
Fredrik Sjöberg. 2016. “The Impact of‘Boss’ Candidates and Local Political Machines on Elections in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 16 (6): 985-1002. Herron, Erik S., Michael Thunberg, and Nazar Boyko. 2015. Crisis Management and Adaptation in Wartime Elections: Ukraine’s 2014 Snap Presidential and Parliamentary Elections.” Electoral Studies 40 (December): 419-29. Herron, Michael C., and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2003. “Overvoting and Representation: An Examination of Overvoted Presidential Ballots in Broward and MiamiDade Counties.” Electoral Studies 22 (1): 21-47. Herzog, Hanna. 1987. “Minor Parties: The Relevancy Perspective.” Comparative Politics 19: 317-29. Heywood, Paul, and Jan-Henrik Meyer-Sahling. 2013. “Danger Zones of Cor ruption: How Management of the Ministerial Bureaucracy Affects Cor ruption Risks in Poland.” Public Administration and Development 33:191֊ 204. Holland, Alisha C. 2017. Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics ofInformal Wel fare in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Howard, Marc Morje. 2002. “The Weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society’ Jour nal of Democracy 13 (1): 157-69.
212 BIBLIOGRAPHY Huber, J. D. 2000. “Delegation to Civil Servants in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal ofPolitical Research 37:397-413. Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michi gan Press. IFES. 2005. Public Opinion in Ukraine—November 2005. Washington, DC: IFES. IFES. 2008. Dissatisfaction Disillusionment in Ukraine: Findings from an IFES 2008 Survey. Washington, DC: IFES. IFES. 2014. Public Opinion in Ukraine 2014. Washington, DC: IFES. IFES. 2015. Key Findings June 2015 Survey in Ukraine. Washington, DC: IFES. Ishchenko, Volodymyr. 2016. “Far Right Participation in the Ukrainian Maidan Protests: An Attempt of Systematic Estimation.” European Politics and Society 17 (4): 453-72. Ishiyama, John T„ and Ryan Kennedy. 2001. “Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.” Europe-Asia Studies 53 (8): 1177-91. James, Martin O. 2002. Congressional Oversight. New York: Nova Science Publish ers. Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press. Johannes, John R. 1983. “Political Culture 8c Congressional Constituency Service.” Polity 15 (4): 555-72. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. 2014. “The Institutional Roots of Anti-Corruption Policies: Comparing the Three Baltic States.” Journal of Baltic Studies 42 (3): 329-46. Johnston, Michael. 2013. “More than Necessary, Less than Sufficient: Democratiza tion and the Control of Corruption.” Social Research 80 (4):
1237-58. Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in PostSoviet Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Juška, Arūnas, and Peter Johnstone. 2004. “The Symbiosis of Politics and Crime in Lithuania.” Journal ofBaltic Studies 35 (4): 346-59. Kairiene, Ingrida. 2013. “Corruption Manifestations in Lithuania’s Police.” Unpub lished manuscript. Accessed online: https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/14925 Karklins, Rasma. 2005. The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-Communist Societies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Karv, Jaanus. 2015. “E-Government and Its Ability to Reduce Corruption: The Case of Estonia.” Department of Political Science, Lund University. Accessed online: http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/5425282 Key, V. 0.1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell. Khmelko, Irina S., and Daniel J. Beers. 2011. “Legislative Oversight in the Ukrai nian Rada: Assessing the Effectiveness of Parliamentary Committees.” Journal ofLegislative Studies 17 (4): 501-24. Khmelko, Irina S., Charles R. Brown, and Trevor L. Wise. 2010. “Committees and
BIBLIOGRAPHY 213 Legislative Strengthening: The Growing Influence of Committees in Ukraine s Legislative Process.” Journal ofLegislative Studies 16 (1): 73-95. King, Anthony. 1976. “Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 1 (1): 11-36. King, Charles. 2004. “A Rose Among Thorns—Georgia Makes Good.” Foreign Af fairs 83 (2): 13-18. King, Gary. 1991. “Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage.” British Jour nal of Political Science 21 (1): 119-28. Klasnja, Marko, Joshua Tucker, and Kevin Deegan-Krause. 2016. “Pocketbook vs. So ciotropic Corruption Voting.” British Journal ofPolitical Science 46 (1): 67-94. Knott, Jack H., and Gary J. Miller. 1987. Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of In stitutional Choice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kubicek, Paul. 2002. “Civil Society, Trade Unions and Post-Soviet Démocratisation: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (4): 603-24. Kuhn, Gabriel. 2010. Life Under the Jolly Roger: Reflections on Golden Age Piracy. Oakland, CA: PM Press. Kupatadze, Alexander. 2012. “Explaining Georgia’s Anti-Corruption Drive.” Euro pean Security 21 (1): 16-36. Kuzio, Taras, ed. 2009. Democratic Revolution in Ukraine: From Kuchmagate to Or ange Revolution. New York, Routledge. Kuzio, Taras. 2010. “Nationalism, Identity and Civil Society in Ukraine: Under standing the Orange Revolution.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 285-96. Kuzio, Taras. 2014 “Impediments to the Emergence of Political Parties in Ukraine.” Politics 34 (4): 309-23. Kuzio,
Taras. 2015. “Rise and Fall of the Party of Regions Political Machine.” Prob lems ofPost-Communism 62:174-86. KIIS (Kyiv International Institute of Sociology). 2015. Corruption in Ukraine: Com parative Analysis of Surveys, 2007,2009, 2011, 2015. Kyiv: KIIS. Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge. Langseth, Peter. 2007. “Measuring Corruption.” In C. Sampford, A. Shaddock, C. Conners, and F. Galtung, eds., Measuring Corruption. Burlington: Ashgate. Lankina, Tornila, Claire Gordon, and Svitlana Slava. 2017. “Regional Development in Ukraine: Priority Actions in Terms of Decentralization.” European Union: European Committee on the Regions. Lapkin, A. 2017. “Spetsializovano antikorruptsiina prokuratura: problemy organizatstii ta diyalnosti.” Pravo Ukraini 2017 (1): 63-70. Ledeneva, Alena V. 2006. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types and Consequences.” An nual Review of Political Science 6:233-56. Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Ivan Molina. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
214 BIBLIOGRAPHY Leipnik, О., and S. Kyrychenko. 2013. “The Public Utilities War and Corruption in Ukraine” Post-Communist Economies 25 (2): 159-74. Lessig, Laurence. 2011. Republic Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It. New York: Twelve (Hachette). Light, Matthew. 2014. “Police Reforms in the Republic of Georgia: The Conver gence of Domestic and Foreign Policy in an Anti-corruption Drive.” Policing and Society 24 (3): 318-45. Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study ofTwenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lindberg, Staffan L, Anna Lührmann, and Valeriya Mechkova. 2017. World Devel opment Report 2017: From De-Jure to De-Facto: Mapping Dimensions and Se quences ofAccountability. World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/3245014 87592445304/Mapping-dimensions-and-sequences-of-accountability Luhrmann, Anna, Kyle L. Marquardt, and Valeriya Mechkova. 2017. “Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountabil ity.” V-Dem Working Paper 2017: 46. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ab stract=2956464 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2956464 Lupia, Arthur. 2003. “Delegation and Its Perils.” In Kaare Strom, Wolfgang C. Muller, and Torbjörn Bergman, eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parlia mentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Maestas, Cherie. 2003. “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” Journal ofPolitics 65 (2): 439-56.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Christopher Weina. 2003. Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Massie, Robert K. 1980. Peter the Great: His Life and World. New York Modem Library. Materiały XIX Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii Kommunisticheskoi partii Sovetskogo Soyuza. 1988. Moscow: Politizdat. Matsuzato, Kimitaka. 2002. “Elites and the Party System of Zakarpattya Oblasť: Relations among Levels of Party Systems.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (8): 1267-99. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165-79. Mebane, Walter R. 2006. “Election Forensics: Vote Counts and Benforďs Lawľ Pa per presented at the 2006 Summer Meeting of the Political Methodology Soci ety, July. Mebane, Walter R„ and Kirill Kalinin. 2009. “Comparative Election Fraud Detec tion.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto. Available online, http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/ gov2126/files/mebane_russia_apsa09.pdf Meguid, B. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral For tunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 215 Meleshevich, Andrey A. 2007. Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries: A Compara tive Study ofPolitical Institutionalization in the Baltic States, Russia, and Ukraine. New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Michael, Bryane, Eleanor Kennon, and Jeppe Kroman Hansen. 2006. “The Future of Anti-Corruption Measures in Lithuania.” Viešoji Poitika ir Administravimas 16: 7-15. Mikhailov, V. V. 2000. Osobaya zona: Vybory v Tatarstane (Ulyanovsk, Kazan Branch of the International Assembly for the Protection of Rights). Miller, Gary J. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Miller, W„ A. Grødeland, and T. Koshechkina. 2000. A Culture of Corruption? Cop ing with Government in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press. Motyl, Alexander J. 1993. Dilemmas ofIndependence: Ukraine After Totalitarianism. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press. Müller, Wolfgang C. 1993. “Executive-Legislative Relations in Austria: 1945-1992.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18 (4): 467-94. Munck, Gerardo L., and Jay Verkuilen. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5-34. Myagkov, Mikhail, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 2001. “The Trail of Votes in Russia’s 1999 Duma and 2000 Presidential Elections.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34 (3): 353-70. Myagkov, M., P. Ordeshook, and D. Shakin. 2009. The Forensics of Election Fraud: Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Kaare Strøm. 2006. “Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and
Non-Partisan Cabinet Members in European De mocracies.” British Journal ofPolitical Science 36 (4): 619-43. Nichter, S. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 19-31. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal ofDemocracy 9 (3): 112-26. Onuch, Olga. 2014. “Who Were the Protesters?” Journal ofDemocracy 25 (3): 4451. Onuch, Olga. 2015. “EuroMaidan Protests in Ukraine: Social Media versus Social Networks.” Problems ofPost-Communism 62:217-35. Ordeshook, Peter C., and Olga V. Shvetsova. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 38 (1): 100-123. Osipian, Ararat L. 2008. “Political Graft and Education Corruption in Ukraine: Compliance, Collusion, and Control” Demokratizatsiya 16 (4): 323-42. Osipian, Ararat. 2017. “University Autonomy in Ukraine: Higher Education Cor ruption and the State.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50 (3): 233-43. Ostrów, Joel M. 2000. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. Palidauskaite, Jolanta, Aive Pevkur, and Iveta Reinholde. 2010. “A Comparative Ap-
216 BIBLIOGRAPHY proach to Civil Service Ethics in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.” Journal ofBal tic Studies 41 (1): 45-71. Parker, Glenn R. 1989. “Looking Beyond Reelection: Revising Assumptions about the Factors Motivating Congressional Behavior.” Public Choice 63 (3): 237-52. Peisakhin, Leonid, and Arturas Rozenas. 2018. “Electoral Effects of Biased Media: Russian Television in Ukraine.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 535-50. Pelizzo, Ricardo, and Frederick Stapenhurst. 2013. Government Accountability and Legislative Oversight. New York: Routledge. Persson, Torsten, Gerard Roland, and Guido Tabellini. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability’ Quarterly Journal ofEconomics 112 (4): 1163-1202. Peterson, Paul E„ and Jay P. Greene. 1994. “Why Executive-Legislative Conflict in the United States Is Dwindling.” British Journal ofPolitical Science 24 (1): 33-55. Philip, Mark, and Elizabeth David-Barrett. 2015. “Realism about Political Corrup tion.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 387-402. Polese, Abel. 2009. “Ukraine 2004: Informal Networks, Transformation of Social Capital and Coloured Revolutions.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transi tion Politics 25 (2-3): 255-77. Pop-Eleches, Grigore, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2017. Communism’s Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Post, Lori Ann, Amber N. W. Raile, and Eric D. Raile. 2010. “Defining Political Will.” Politics Policy 38 (4): 653-76. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. 1999 Democracy, Ac
countability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Ahne: The Collapse and Revival of the American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Rafael-Lopez Pintor. 2000. Election Management Bodies as Institutions of Gover nance. United Nations Development Program, http://www.eods.eu/library/ UNDP.EIectoral%20Management%20Bodies%20as%20Institutions%20of%20 Governance.pdf Rentniek, David. 1997. Resurrection. New York: Random House. Reuter, Ora John. 2017. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richardson, Lilliard E., Jr., and Patricia K. Freeman. 1995. “Gender Differences in Constituency Service among State Legislators.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 169-79. Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Rockman, Bert A. 1984. “Legislative-Executive Relations and Legislative Over sight.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 387-440. Roeder, Philip. 1993. Red Sunset: The Failure ofSoviet Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 217 Rosas, Guillermo, Yael Shomer, and Stephen R. Haptonstahl. 2015. “No News Is News: Nonignorable Nonresponse in Roll-Call Data Analysis.” American Jour nal ofPolitical Science 59 (2): 511-28. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “The Poetical Economy of Corruption.” In K. A. El liott, ed. Corruption and the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute of In ternational Economics. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Bonnie J. Palifka. 2016. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Round, John, Colin C. Williams, and Peter Rodgers. 2008. “Corruption in the PostSoviet Workplace: The Experiences of Recent Graduates in Contemporary Ukraine.” Work, Employment, and Society 22 (1): 149-66. Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, and Sharon L. Wolchik, eds. 2009. Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Salmond, Robert. 2007. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Account ability Mechanisms Affect Citizens and Politics, PhD diss., UCLA. Sanders, Deborah. 2017. ‘“The War We Want; The War that We Get.’: Ukraine’s Mil itary Reform and the Conflict in the East.” Journal of Slavic Military Studies 30 (1): 30-49. Schedler, Andreas. 1999. “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Schedler, Andreas, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds. 1999. The SelfRestraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl. 1991. “What Democracy Is... and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy (Summer): 3-16. Schueth, Samuel. 2012. “Apparatus of Capture: Fiscal State Formation in the Repub lic of Georgia.” Political Geography 31:133-43. Schulze, Gunther G., and Bjorn Frank. 2003. “Deterrence Versus Intrinsic Motiva tion: Experimental Evidence on the Determinants of Corruptibility.” Economics of Governance 4:143-60. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper. Serra, George, and David Moon. 1994. “Casework, Issue Positions, and Voting in Congressional Elections: A District Analysis.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 200213. Sharma, Rakesh. 2003. Public Opinion in Ukraine 2002: Findings from and IFES Survey. Washington, DC: IFES. Shekhovtsov, Anton. 2011. “The Creeping Resurgence of the Radical Right? The Case of the Freedom Party.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (2): 203-28. Shekhovtsov, Anton, and Andreas Umland. 2014. “Ukraine’s Radical Right.” Journal of Democracy 25 (3): 58-63.
218 BIBLIOGRAPHY Shevel, Oxana. 2015. “The Parliamentary Elections in Ukraine, October 2014.” Elec toral Studies 39:159-63. Shugart, Matthew S., and John Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sobyanin, A. A., and V. G. Sukhovolskiy. 1995. Demokratiya, Ogranichennaya Falsifikatsiyami: Vybory i Referendumy v Rossii v 1991-1993 Gg. Moscow: Project Group for Human Rights. Stepanenko, Victor. 2006. “Civil Society in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic Ethos in the Framework of Corrupted Sociality.” East European Politics and Society 20 (4): 571-97. Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Poli tics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 315-25. Sung, Hung-En. 2003. “Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revis ited.” Social Forces 82 (2): 703-23. Swearer, Howard R. 1961. “The Functions of Soviet Elections.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 129-49. Szpiro, George. 2010. Numbers Rule: The Vexing Mathematics of Democracy, from Plato to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Taagepera, Rein. 2002. “Baltic Values and Corruption in Comparative Context.” Journal of Baltic Studies 33 (3): 243-58. Temple, Paul. 2006. “Universities Without Corruption: A New Approach for Geor gia’s Higher Education.” International Higher Education: 19-20. , Thames, Frank C. 2007. “Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998-2002.” Legislative Studies Quar terly 32 (2): 223-56. Thompson, Theresa, and Anwar Shah.
2005. “Transparency International’s Corrup tion Perceptions Index: Whose Perceptions Are They Anyway?” http://sitere sources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/TransparencyIn ternationalCorruptionIndex.pdf Tkachuk, A., O. Garan’, V. Khmelko, and O. Maiboroda. 2000. Ukrainskt Uvi: mizh Leninizmom і sotial-demokratieyu. Kyiv: KM Academia. Treisman, Daniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Empirical Research?” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 211-44. Tucker, Joshua A. 2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and the ‘Second Wave’ of Post-Communist Democratic Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 537-53. Udovychenko, Volodymyr, Anatoliy Melnychuk, Oleksiy Gnatiuk, and Pavlo Osta penko. 2017. “Decentralization Reform in Ukraine: Assessment of the Chosen Transformation Model.” European Spatial Research and Policy 24 (1): 23-40. Uppal, Yogesh. 2009. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Ef fects in Indian State Legislatures.” Public Choice 138 (1-2): 9-27.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 219 Vandenabeele, Wouter. 2007. “Toward a Public Administration Theory of Pubic Service Motivation.” Public Management Review 9: 545-56. Wagner, Markus. 2012. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845-64. Wand, Jonathan N.. Kenneth W. Shotts, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Walter R. Mebane, Mi chael C. Herron, and Henry E. Brady. 2001. “The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 793-810. Way, Lucan. 2014. “Civil Society and Democratization.” Journal of Democracy 25 (3): 35-43. Whitmore, Sarah. 2004. State-Building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament 19902003. London: Routledge. Wilson, Andrew. 2000. The Ukrainians: Unexpected Nation. New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press. Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven: Yale University Press. Wilson, Andrew, and Artur Bilous. 1993. “Political Parties in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 45 (4): 693-703. Wilson, Andrew, and Sarah Birch. 1999. “Voting Stability, Political Gridlock: Ukraine’s 1998 Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (6): 1039-68. World Bank. n.d. “Accountability in Governance.” Available online: https://sitere sources.worldbank.org/PUBLICSECTORANDGOVERNANCE/Resources/ AccountabilityGovernance.pdf (last accessed on October 10,2018). World Bank. 2000. Anti-Corruption in Transition. Washington, DC: World Bank. Yamamoto, Hironori. 2007. Tools for Parliamentary Oversight: A Comparative Study of 88 National Parliaments. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2017. Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
INDEX XIXth All Union Conference of the CPSU, 34 XXVIIth Party Congress of the CPSU, 11,3234 Abromavičius, Aivaras, 96,197 Accountability as concept, 7-9,171-72 definition of, 7-9 diagonal, 5,14-17,30,43,102-123,170-71, 198nl0 in Eastern Europe, 10-13,178-80 in Estonia, 178-80 in Georgia, 174,177-80 horizontal, 5,5-17,30,43,80-101,123,148, 171,184,191n20,196n3 informal/formal rules, 2,7-8,11-13,172 in Latvia, 178-80 in Lithuania, 179-80 as practice, 7-10,25,180,190nl2,196n9 as punishment, 7-8,14,22,174 in Russia, 28,35-36,172-74 types of actors, 147,149-50,166-69,17477, 179-180,182,186-87 types of collective accountability, 17-19 types of individual accountability, 17-19 types of power, 33,125 types of reciprocal accountability, 19-20 types of relationships, 14,153,155 types of unidirectional accountability, 19-20 in Ukraine, 26-42,149-150,166-69,174֊ 77,179-80,182,186-87 vertical, 5,15-17,24, 30,33, 35,42-79,123, 171,203n8 Akhmetov, Rinat, 98 Anti-Corruption Court, 81,84,97,102 Anti-Corruption Institutions, 81,84,97, 99, 102,151 Armenia democracy in, 51,203n4 elections in, 51 Azerbaijan democracy in, 51 elections in, 51,57-58 Batkivshchyna. See Fatherland Belarus democracy in, 51,63 elections in, 51,106,173-74 Black Ledger, 99,109 Black PR, 24-25 Bloc of Petro Poroshenko. See Poroshenko Bloc Boyko, Yurii, 143,164-66 Bureaucracy and corruption, 10,31-32,178,180,183 need for, 70,127-31 party influence, 35-36,47,64,86,124-26 Weber and, 125-26,176,199n2 Cabinet of Ministers, 85,151-52,154,178 Central Electoral Commission (CEC), 49,5354,74, 112,127, 152, 158, 200n23 Chesno,
18,117,119-20 CIFRA Group, 53,122,131 Civil Oversight Council, 41 Civil Society, 2-3,5,28,30, 36,42-43,102-5, 121-22 Committee on the Prevention of Corruption, 151 Communist Party of the Soviet Union, 31-35, 61-62,67-68,148 Communist Party of Ukraine, 55-56,63,65, 68-70,88, 134-36,141, 197nl0 Congress of People’s Deputies, 11,31,34-35, 62,67 221
222 INDEX Corruption definition of, 23-26 effects on citizens, І6,22,24-26,28, Зі-35, 43,46-47, 50, 79, 96,108,114, 122-24, 152,166-72 effects on politicians, 22-23, 27, 37-38, 68, 72-73, 78-79, 96, 98, 100-101, 148,164, 166-67, 170-71,183-84 in Estonia, 174,176-77, 179-81 in Georgia, 41, 96,174,177-80,183 illegal behavior, 13, 24-25, 98,183-84, 201֊2n7 in Latvia, 174, 176-77,179-80 in Lithuania, 174,176-80 “normal behavior,” 2,12-14,18, 24-26,116, 121, 124,140, 146,170-71,180,186-87 normalization, 12,123,146,167 perpetrated by bureaucrats, 25,124,126-27, 178, 181-83 perpetrated by oligarchs, 3,35,98-101,148, 150-51, 155-56, 170 perpetrated by politicians, 22, 27, 37,60,66, 73,79, 96-98,100, 164-67, 169-71, 17981,184 in Russia, 16, 24-25, 28-29, 36, 39-40, 64, 98-99, 174,187,193nl7, 203n4 Transparency International and corruption, 23, 27-29, 201Ш in Ukraine, 2-6, 23, 26-29, 31, 35-43,7879, 81, 95-101,108,121-23, 127,147-49, 151, 155-56, 167-70,172,174, 179,181֊ 82, 185-87, 190nl0,192nn6-ll, 201nl, 202nn8-9 CPSU. See Communist Party of the Soviet Union CPU. See Communist Party of Ukraine Crimea, 2, 27, 39-40, 50, 58-59, 69, 71, 76-77, 129, 173, 176,185,187,198n22, 202nl8 Decembrist Revolt, 11 Democracy definition of, 9-10 egalitarian, 26-27 electoral, 26-27 liberal, 26-27 participatory, 26-27 prerequisites, 26-31 quality of, 10, 27,123, 174 USSR implementation, 31-36,61 Deputy requests definition of, 5 horizontal accountability, 80-81,85-94, 100-101 institutional targets, 91-92 time to response/satisfaction, 92-95 4th Convocation, 80, 84, 86-87 8th Convocation, 80, 87,
90-92, 94 Donbas, 2, 27, 40,49, 58-59,69, 71, 76-78, 107,129,173, 176,185,187, 198n22 Donetsk, 37, 40, 53, 156, 160-62 e-declarations cash assets, 97, 149-50, 166-67,171 definition of, 41,149, 153 property, 156-58,164 Election administration, 3, 5,41, 51, 77,108, 110,113,121-28,133,135,142-44,146֊ 47,170-72, 182-83,186,194n5 Election fraud OSCE, 48-50,110,192nl0 Azerbaijan and, 51, 58 digit distribution tests and, 56-59 Frank Benford and, 56-59 Georgia and, 59, 183 malpractice, 47 media bias, 49 turnout and, 54, 57-59,63,66, 144,19ІПІ8, 194nl6 voter coercion, 49 Election Management Bodies (EMBs), 30,42, 113,122, 124, 128,130-31,133,143, 147 Election observation Committee for Open Democracy, 52-53 domestic observers, 38, 48,50,56, 110-13 Elect UA, 50, 114-15 international observers, 38,48,50, 53,56, 110-12, 129,184 Maidan Monitoring, 50,114-15 OSCE, 48-50,110, 192nl0 Elections campaigns and, 82, 88, 98,109, 123, 146, 181 in 1994, 36,63-64, 67-68, 70, 75-76,129, 195n20 in 1998,48-49,64, 67, 70-71, 74-76,129, 191n24 in 2002, 37, 49, 55-56, 58, 64-65, 67, 69-70, 72,74-76, 80, 84, 87, 191n24 in 2004, 37-39,49-50, 59,65, 71-72, 76,78, 84,111,121,132 in 2010, 2,27-28, 39,42-43, 48-49, 58-59,
INDEX 65, 71, 76, 83-84,113, 130, 139, 145-47, 186,196ոՅՅ, 201ո27 in 2012,49-50, 53, 57-58,65, 67, 74-76, 78, 111, 113-14,134-36,139-40, 145, 201ո27 in 2014, 27, 38-42,49, 51,53-54, 58,65, 67-68, 71, 74-76, 83, 87,89-90,111, 117, 129-32,139-140,142-45, 147,171, 195ո21, 200ո9, 201ո27 İn 2019, 3, 16, 18, 41-43, 49, 51, 53-54, 58, 66-67, 71-73, 76-79, 96, 100-101, 111, 138,146, 152,168,179, nl94 Electoral commissions, 49, 58,128-31, 134, 186, 194n9,194nl2 Electoral Integrity Project, 51-52 Electoral precincts, 6,16, 50, 53, 55-59, 111, 113-14,128,130,144,183 Electoral system in Ukraine, 18,51, 60-70, 7579, 84, 98, 123,129, 169, 181-82,186, 191n24,193nl2 Estonia anti-corruption institutions in, 176-77,181 corruption in, 177,179-180, 203nl2 democracy in, 62,174-75, 182 elections in, 51-53 Euromaidan, 2-3,5-6, 28, 39,41-43, 59,65, 71-72, 80-81, 84, 87, 89-91, 93, 95-96, 98,101,103,105,107, 111, 121-22, 148, 151, 166, 168,170,172-73,184, 186, 195n32 European Solidarity See Poroshenko Bloc European Union (EU), 39,105,176 Extremism, 57, 59,72,107 Fatherland Party, 70, 72, 89,119-20, 134, 165 First-past-the-post (FPTP) System, 63,66 For a United Ukraine Bloc, 55, 69-71, 136, 197nl0 Freedom Party, 70,72, 91,135-36 Georgia anti-corruption institutions in, 177-80 corruption in, 41,178, 183 democracy in, 96,173-74,181 elections in, 51-53, 57-58, 194nl6 Rose Revolution, 177-78 Gorbachev, Mikhail, 11, 32-36, 61,103 Groysman, Volodymyr, 96, 164-65 Incumbency, 5, 32,49, 59-61, 73-74, 87-93, 183 223 Jaresko, Natalia, 96 Katerenchuk, Mykolą, 86 Kazakhstan democracy in, 173 elections in, 51-53
Khrushchev, Nikita, 32 Kinakh, Anatolii, 69 Knopkodavsto. See proxy voting Kolomoyskyi, Ihor, 3, 98, 100 Kompromat, 12-13,24 Kravchuk, Leonid, 36, 62, 76 Krugovaya poruka, 24-25 Kuchma, Leonid, 36-39, 64-65,69, 76, 83-84, 87-88,103-4,121, 194nl0 Kvitashvili, Alexander, 96 Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 5253,131, 151, 202nn8-9 Kyrgyzstan democracy in, 203n3 elections in, 52-53 Latvia anti-corruption institutions in, 176-77, 179-80 corruption in, 174-75 democracy in, 62 elections in, 53 Law on the Prevention of Corruption, 96-97, 154 Law on the Status of People’s Deputies, 85, 198nl3 Lithuania anti-corruption institutions in, 176-77, 179-80 corruption in, 174-75,184 democracy in, 62,64,174 elections in, 53 Luhansk, 40, 59,155, 161 Liashko, Oleh, 164-66 Lytvyn, Volodymyr, 69-70,76 Manafort, Paul, 38, 99-100 Másol, Vitalii, 103 Mixed-member majoritarian (МММ) system, 60,63-65, 67, 70 Mixed-member electoral system, 63-64,7576,19ІП24 . Moldova democracy in, 174, 203n3 elections in, 52-53
224 INDEX Moroz, Anatolil, 87 Moroz, Oleksandr, 38,69 Quid pro quo, 126,132-33,144,147, 192n5 National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), 41-42,81,84,97, 99-101,151 Narodnyi Rukh. See People’s Movement Negative ballots, 61,63,133 Radical Party, 70,89,91,119-20,136, 165 Revolution of Dignity. See Euromaidan Revolution on Granite, 103 Right-wing extremists, 72,107 Russia corruption in, 16,24-25,28-29,36, 39-40, 64,98-99,174,187,193nl7,203n4 democracy in, 10-13,28-29,174,185 elections in, 12,16,51,64,98-99 Oligarchs and accountability, 95,98-101,148,150-51, 155-56, 170,204n21 definition of, 35 Open-List Proportional Representation (OLPR) system, 66 Opposition Bloc, 70-71,75,89,119-20,165, 185 Opposition Platform-For Life, 70-71,185 Orange Revolution, 2-3,5,16,26,28,37-40, 43, 51, 59,64,69, 72, 78, 82-84, 87-95, 100-104, 113,121,132, 151, 168,170, 173; 191n23, 195n24 Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 48-50,110,192nl0 Osyka, Serhii, 86 Our Ukraine, 55-56,70,72,134,136,140-41, 191n24,194nl5,197nl0 Oversight. See Accountability Parliament. See Verkhovna Rada Party of Regions, 38,58,70-71, 75, 90,95, 99, ПО, 117,134,136,140-43, 170, 185, 195n21, 197nl0 Party system in Ukraine, 5-6,18,31, 35-36, 38,42,45,60, 62-67,69, 72-73, 75-76, 78-79, 87, 98,108,123,142-43, 169,182 Peoples Movement, 68-69,71-72,104,137, 141 Peoples Front, 70-71,92,119-20 Pinchuk, Viktor, 69,98 Polling stations. See Electoral precincts PORA/OPORA, 104,111-12,197n4 Poroshenko Bloc, 70,72,75,89, 91, 119-20, 137,141 Poroshenko, Petro, 23,40,72,75-76,89,91, 98, 101-2,119, 143, 148,164 Pravyi
Sektor, 72,107 Principal-Agent Theory, 10,46,102,194n4 Proxy voting, 5-6,103,116-21,123,148,168, 170, 183-84, 199nn25-27 Public opinion data. See Survey data Putin, Vladimir, 39,187,193n21 Saakashvili, Mikheil, 96,177-79 Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), 97,99 Schumpeter, Joseph, 9 Selectorate, 11,20,32 Self-Reliance Party, 70, 89,119-20 Servant of the People Party, 3, 70,72,168,182, 184,204nl9 Shaimiev, Minitimir, 16,191nl8 Single-seat districts (SSD), 62-64, 74, 76,90, 136-38 Socialist Party of Ukraine (SPU), 69 Soviet Union, 11,31-36, 42,61-62,82, 103-4,150,175-76,193nl4,193nl7, 193nl9 Stalin, Joseph, 21-32, 61 Subject of the electoral process, 134,138 Suprun, Liudmyla, 71 Suprun, Ulana, 96,186,197nll Survey data, 48, 50,53-54,77,105,153, 194nn7֊8,194ППІ1-12,200nl0, 200nl8, 200n24,201n27,202nn9-10 Svoboda Party. See Freedom Party Tajikistan democracy in, 173 elections in, 51 Technical candidates. See Technical parties Technical parties commissioner replacement, 133-35,13842,170-71, 200n23 definition of, 6,128,199n4 overreliance on, 142-44,146-48,183-84, 186,195n21 Tihipko, Serhii, 143 Tomenko, Mykolą, 117 Trepak, Viktor, 99
INDEX Turkmenistan democracy in, 173,203ո4 elections in, 51 Tymoshenko Bloc. See Fatherland Tymoshenko, Yuliia, 16,38-39,59,69,72,143, • 146,164-66, 186,197nl0 Ukraine accountability in, 1-6,18,20-21,23,26-28, 31, 35-36,40-43,45, 49-53, 59-60, 6367,73-76,78-85,95,97-103,108,116, 121-23, 149-50, 153,164, 167-70, 17274,179,182,186-87 constitution in, 36-37,39,42-43,63,65, 82-85, 89, 122,19ІПІ7, 195n20 corruption in, 2-6, 23, 26-29, 31, 35-43, 78-79, 81, 95-101,108, 121-23, 127, 147-49,151,155-56, 167-70, 172, 174, 179,181-82,185-87,190nl0, 192nn611,201nl, 202nn8-9 democracy in, 26-28,123,185,192n9 procurement processes, 150 state capacity in, 35-36,62,83,108,149 technical parties in, 6, 128,133,135,138, 140-43,147-48, 168, 170,186, 195n21 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), 11,31,33, 35-36,62,68, 195n20 Uzbekistan corruption in, 34,203n4 democracy in, 33-34,173 elections in, 51 Valyuta, 148 Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM), 26,174, 203n4 Verkhovna Rada, 3, 5-6,27-28,37-43, 49-50, 53, 55-56, 58-59,62-63,65-67, 71, 73, 76, 78-80, 82-89, 91-93, 95-96, 98-99, 101, 103, 116-17, 119-21, 123,128-30,134-36,140,142-43, 145, 151-52, 155, 159,170, 198nl4, 199nl Voice (Party), 70 Weber, Max, 125-26,176,199n2 Whips, 116-17 World Values Survey (WVS), 105-6 Yanukovych, Viktor 2004 election, 28, 37-40,65, 71, 111 Euromaidan and, 40-43,65,95,103,121- 22 Orange Revolution and, 2, 59,83-84,88, 100,133,170 Yushchenko, Viktor, 16, 37-39,69,72,76, 132-33 Zakazukha, 24 Zelenskyy, Volodymyr, 3,41-42,51,72,76-77, 100-101, 117,152, 168-70, 183-84, 194n9 Bayerische) Staatsbibliothek v München 225
Į
|
adam_txt |
CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii List of Tables xi List of Figures xiii Introduction 1. How Accountability Works 1 7 2. Politics and the Struggle with Corruption 22 3. Vertical Accountability 44 4. Horizontal Accountability 80 5. Diagonal Accountability 102 6. Strategic Misrepresentation and Accountability 123 7. Wealth and Accountability 148 8. Conclusion 168 Notes 189 Bibliography 205 Index 221 Digital materials related to this title can be found on the Fulcrum platform via the following citable URL: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub. 11596348
BIBLIOGRAPHY Aberbach, Joel. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye. Washington, DC: Brookings Institu tion Press. Adams, J., M. Clark, L. Ezrow, and G. Glasgow. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamen tally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Conse quences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 513-29. Adsera, Alicia, Carles Boix, and Mark Payne. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government!’ Journal ofLaw, Economics, Ժ Or ganization 19 (2): 445-90. Aidt, Toke. 2003. “Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey.” Economic Jour nalin (491): 632-52. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation ofPolitical Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Andeweg, Rudy B. 1992. “Executive-Legislative Relations in the Netherlands: Con secutive and Coexisting Patterns.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (2): 161-82. Andrews, Josephine T., and Robert W. Jackman. 2005. “Strategic Fools: Electoral Rules Choice Under Extreme Uncertainty.” Electoral Studies 24:65-84. Argersinger, Peter H. 1985-1986. “New Perspectives on Election Fraud in the Gilded Age.” Political Science Quarterly 100 (4): 669-87. Armantier, Olivier, and Amadou Boly. 2011. “A Controlled Field Experiment on Corruption.” European Economic Review 55 (8): 1072-82. Ashworth, Scott, and Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. 2006. “Delivering the Goods: Leg islative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings.” Journal ofPolitics 68 (1): 168-79. Aslund, Anders. 2005. “Comparative
Oligarchy: Russia, Ukraine and the United States.” Center for Social and Economic Research, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.1441910 Aslund, Anders. 2014. “Oligarchs, Corruption, and European Integration.” Journal ofDemocracy 25 (3): 64-73. Atkinson, Michael M., and Kim Richard Nossal. 1980. “Executive Power and Com mittee Autonomy in the Canadian House of Commons: Leadership Selection, 1968-1979.” Canadian Journal ofPolitical Science t Revue canadienne de science politique 13 (2): 287-308. 205
206 BIBLIOGRAPHY Auers, Daunis. 2015. Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States. Lon don: Paigrave Macmillan. Ball, Nicole. 2005. “Strengthening Democratic Governance of the Security Sector in Conflict-Affected Countries.” Public Administration Development 25 (1): 2538. Barrington, Lowell, Erik S. Herron, and Brian D. Silver. 2003. “The Motherland Is Calling: Views of Homeland Among Russians in the Near Abroad.” World Poli tics 55 (January): 290-313. Beal, Amanda L., and Leah Graham. 2014. “Foundations for Change: Rule of Law, Development, and Democratization.” Politics Policy 42 (3): 311-45. Beber, Bernd, and Alexandra Scacco. 2012. “What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud.” Political Analysis 20: 211-34. Beissinger, Mark R. 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenom ena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (2): 259-76. Beissinger, Mark R. 2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 57492. Bensel, Richard Franklin. 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Birch, Sarah. 1997. “Nomenklatura Democratization: Electoral Clientelism in PostSoviet Ukraine.” Democratization 4 (4): 40-62. Birch, Sarah. 2000. Elections and Democratization in Ukraine. New York: St. Mar tin’s Press. Birch, Sarah. 2008. “Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Pro cesses: A Cross-National Analysis.” Electoral Studies 27 (2): 305-20.
Birch, Sarah. 2012. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birch, Sarah, and Andrew Wilson. 1999. “The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections of 1998.” Electoral Studies 18: 276-82. Bojcun, Marko. 1995. “The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections in March-April 1994.” Europe-Asia Studies 47 (2): 229-49. Borowiak, Craig T. 2011. Accountability and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bovens, Mark. 2007a. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Review 13 (4): 447-68. Bovens, Mark. 2007b. “New Forms of Accountability and EU-Governance.” Com parative European Politics 5:104-20. Boyko, Nazar, and Erik S. Herron. 2015. “The Effects of Technical Parties and Par tisan Election Management Bodies on Voting Outcomes.” Electoral Studies 40 (December): 23-33. Boyko, Nazar, Erik S. Herron, and Roman Sverdan. 2014. “Administration and Management of Ukraine’s 2014 Presidential Election: A Systematic and Spatial Analysis.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55 (3): 286-306. Brown, Trevor L., and Charles R. Wise. 2004. “Constitutional Courts and Legislative-
BIBLIOGRAPHY 207 Executive Relations: The Case of Ukraine.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (1): 143-69. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic ofPolitical Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bunce, Valerie J., and Sharon L. Wolchik. 2006. “International Diffusion and Post communist Electoral Revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39 (3): 283-304. Buzin, A. Yu., and A. E. Lyubarev. 2008. Prestuplenie hez nakazaniya: Administra tivnye tekhnologii federaľnykh výborov 2007-2008 godov. Moscow: Nikkolo M. Cain, Bruce E„ John A. Ferejohn, et al. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Ser vice and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Callahan, William A., and Duncan McCargo. 1996. “Vote-Buying in Thailand’s Northeast: The July 1995 General Election.” Asian Survey 36 (4): 376-92. Campbell, Robert W. 1991. The Socialist Economies in Transition. Bloomington: In diana University Press. Campbell, Tracy. 2005. Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, An American Political Tradition (1742-2004). New York: Carroll and Graf. Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carey, John M. 2018. “Electoral System Design in New Democracies.” In Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, eds., Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carey, John M., and Matthew S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4):
417-39. Carothers, Thomas. 1997. “The Observers Observed.” Journal of Democracy 8 (3): 17-31. Carson, George B., Jr. 1955. Electoral Practices in the USSR. New York: Frederick A. Praeger. Chaisty, Paul, and Svitlana Chernykh. 2015. “Coalitional Presidentialism and Legislative Control in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31 (3): 177200. Clarke, Harold D. 1978. “Determinants of Provincial Constituency Service Behav iour: A Multivariate Analysis.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 3 (4): 601-28. Clarke, Harold D., Richard G. Price, et al. 1975. “Constituency Service among Ca nadian Provincial Legislators: Basic Findings and a Test of Three Hypotheses.” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique 8 (4): 520-42. Colomer, Josep M. 2018. “Party System Effects on Electoral Systems.” In Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, eds., Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) 1992. The December 1, 1991 Referendum/Presidential Election in Ukraine, https://www.csce.gov/ sites/helsinkicommission.house.gov/files/120191UkraineReferendum.pdf (ac cessed online on March 26,2018).
208 BIBLIOGRAPHY Cox, Gary, and J. M. Kousser. 1981. “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 25 (4): 646-63. Cox, Gary, and Matthew McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Govern ment in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cox, Homersham. 1868 [2005]. Antient [sic] Parliamentary Election. London: Elibron Classics. Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press. D’Anieri, Paul, Robert Kravchuk, and Taras Kuzio. 1999. Politics and Society in Ukraine. Boulder: Westview Press. Denk, Thomas, and Daniel Silander. 2011. “Problems in Paradise? Challenges to Future Democratization in Democratic States.” International Political Science Review 33 (1): 25-40. DeVries, Catherine E., and Hector Solaz. 2017. “The Electoral Consequences of Corruption.” Annual Review ofPolitical Science 20:391-408. Diaby, Aboubacar, and Kevin Sylwester. 2014. “Bureaucratic Competition and Pub lic Corruption: Evidence from Transition Countries.” European Journal of Po litical Economy 35: 75-87. Di Puppo, Lili. 2014. “The Construction of Success in Anti-Corruption Activity in Georgia.” East European Politics 30 (1): 105-22. Diuk, Nadia. 2013. “Youth as an Agent for Change: The Next Generation in Ukraine.” Demokratizatisya 21 (2): 179-96. Diuk, Nadia. 2014. “Euromaidan: Ukraine’s Self-Organizing Revolution.” World Af fairs 176 (6): 9-16. Djilas, Milovan. 1957. The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. New York: Praeger. Dobryninas, Alexandras. 2005. “Lithuania’s Anti-
Corruption Policy: Between ‘East’ and ‘West.”’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 11: 77-95. Doig, Alan. 2006-2007. “Not as Easy as It Sounds? Delivering the National Integrity System Approach in Practice: The Case Study of the National Anti-Corruption Programme in Lithuania.” Public Administration Quarterly 30 (3/4): 273-313. Dollar, David, Raymond Fishman, and Roberta Gatti. 2001. “Are Women Really the “Fairer” Sex? Corruption and Women in Government.” Journal ofEconomic Be havior Organization 46 (4): 423-29. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory ofDemocracy. New York· Harper. Easter, Gerald. 2000. Reconstructing the State: Personal Networks and Elite Identity in Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elster, Jon. 1999. “Accountability in Athenian Politics.” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representa tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engvall, Johan. 2012. “Against the Grain: How Georgia Fought Corruption and What It Means.” Silk Road Paper. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hop kins University. Engvall, Johan. 2015. “The State as Investment Market: A Framework for Interpret ing the Post-Soviet State in Eurasia.” Governance 28 (1): 25-40.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 209 Engvall, Johan. 2015. The State as Investment Market: Kyrgyzstan in Comparative Perspective. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. Epstein, Leon D. 1980 [2000]. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Bruns wick Transaction. Ethridge, Marcus E. 1984. “A Political-Institutional Interpretation of Legislative Oversight Mechanisms and Behavior.” Polity 17 (2): 340-59. European Commission. 2014. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: EU Anti-Corruption Report. Brussels: European Com mission. Federal Election Commission. 1990.1990 U.S. Election Study Tour of the Central Electoral Commission of the U.S.S.R. FEC: Washington, DC. Mimeo. Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability.” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ferguson, Gary A. 1999. Public Opinion in Ukraine 1999. Washington, DC: IFES. Ferrara, Federico, Erik S. Herron, and Misa Nishikawa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Sys tems: Contamination and its Consequences. New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Fisun, Oleksandr. 2016. “Ukrainian Constitutional Politics: Neopatrimonialism, Rent-seeking, and Regime Change.” In Henry Hale and Robert Orttung, eds., Beyond Euromaidan: Comparative Perspectives on Advancing Reform in Ukraine. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Friedman, John N„ and Richard T. Holden. 2009. “The Rising Incumbent Reelec tion Rate: What’s Gerrymandering Got to Do with It?” Journal ofPolitics 71 (2):
593-611. Frye, Timothy, Joel Heilman, et al. 2000. “Data Base on Political Institutions in the Post-Communist World.” Ohio State University. Frye, Timothy, Ora John Reuter, and David Szakonyi. 2014. “Political Machines at Work Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66 (2): 195-228. Fukuyama, Francis. 2013. “What Is Governance?” Governance 26 (3): 347-68. Gailmard, Sean, and John W. Patty. 2007. “Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 873-89. Gallagher, Mary E„ and Jonathan K. Hanson. 2015. “Power Tool or Dull Blade: Selectorate Theory for Autocracies.” Annual Review ofPolitical Science 18:367-85. Gans-Morse, Jordan, Mariana Borges, Alexey Makarin, Theresa Mannah-Blankson, Andre Nicków, and Dong Zhang. 2018. “Reducing Bureaucratic Corruption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on What Works.” World Development 105:171֊ 88. Gehlbach, S., K. Sonin, and E. Zhuravskaya. 2010 “Businessman Candidates.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 54,718-36. Gleason, Gregory. 1990. “Nationalism or Organized Crime? The Case of the ‘Cotton Scandal’ in the USSR.” Corruption and Reform 5 (2): 87-108. Goetz, Anne Marie, and Rob Jenkins. 2001. “Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citi-
210 BIBLIOGRAPHY zen Engagement in Institutions of Public-Sector Oversight in India.” Public Management Review 3 (3): 363-83. Gregory, Paul R., and Robert C. Stuart. 1986. Soviet Economic Structure and Perfor mance. New York: Harper and Row. Gugushvili, Dimitri. 2017. “Lessons from Georgia’s Neoliberal Experiment: A Ris ing Tide Does Not Necessarily Lift All Boats.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50:1-14. Guriev, S., and A. Rachinsky. 2005, “The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism.” Journal ofEconomic Perspectives 19(1): 131-50. Gylfason, Thorvaldur, and Eduard Hochreiter. 2009. “Growing Apart? A Tale of Two Republics: Estonia and Georgia.” European Journal ofPolitical Economy 25: 355-70. Hale, Henry E. 2015. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hale, Henry E., and Robert W. Orttung, eds. 2016. Beyond the Euromaidan: Com parative Perspectives on Advancing Reform in Ukraine. Stanford: Stanford Uni versity Press. Hall, Thad E. 2018. “Election Administration.” In Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pe kkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, eds., Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Halligan, John, Robert Krause, et al. 1988. “Constituency Service among SubNational Legislators in Australia and Canada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1): 49-63. Hazan, Reuven Y. 1997. “Executive-Legislative Relations in an Era of Accelerated Reform: Reshaping Government in Israel.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (3): 329-50. Heitshusen, Valerie, Garry Young, et al. 2005. “Electoral
Context and MP Constitu ency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United King dom.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 49 (1): 32-45. Heilman, J. S., G. Jones, and D. Kaufmann. 2003. “Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture and Influence in Transition Economies.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (4): 251-73. Helms, Ludger, ed. 2009. Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies. London: Routledge. Herron, Erik S. 1999. “Democratization and the Development of Information Re gimes: The Internet in Eurasia and the Baltics.” Problems of Post-Communism 46 (July-August): 56-68. Herron, Erik S. 2002. “Causes and Consequences of Fluid Faction Membership in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (4): 625-39. Herron, Erik S. 2003. “Election Fraud and Manipulation: Central Asia in Compara tive Perspective.” Journal of Central Asian Studies 8 (Fall/Winter): 2-16. Herron, Erik S. 2009. Elections and Democracy After Communism? New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Herron, Erik S. 2011a. “How Viktor Yanukovych Won: Reassessing the Dominant
BIBLIOGRAPHY 211 Narratives of Ukraine’s 2010 Presidential Election.” East European Politics and Societies 25 (February): 47-67. Herron, Erik S. 2011b. “Measuring Dissent in Electoral Authoritarian Societies: Lessons from Azerbaijan’s 2008 Presidential Election and 2009 Referendum.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (November): 1557-83. Herron, Erik S., and Nazar Boyko. 2012. “Reversing Democratic Revolutions: The Implications of Ukraine’s 2010 Local Elections.” Journal of East European and Asian Studies 3 (1): 79-100. Herron, Erik S., and Nazar Boyko. 2015. “Horizontal Accountability during Politi cal Transition: The Use of Deputy Requests in Ukraine, 2002-2006.” Party Politicsii (1): 131-42. Herron, Erik S., and Nazar Boyko. 2016. “Conducting Credible Elections Under Threat: Results from a Survey of Election Administrators.” Election Law Journal 15 (4): 285-301. Herron, Erik S., Nazar Boyko, and Michael Thunberg. 2017. “Serving Two Masters: Professionalization Vs. Corruption in Ukraine’s Election Administration.” Gov ernance 30 (4): 601-19. Herron, Erik S., Brian Fitzpatrick, and Maksym Palamarenko. 2019. “The Practice and Implications of Legislative Proxy Voting in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 35 (1): 41-62. Herron, Erik S., and Paul E. Johnson. 2008. “Fraud Before the ‘Revolution’: Special Precincts in Ukraine’s 2002 Parliamentary Election.” In Ingmar Bredies, Valen tin Yakushik, and Andreas Umland, eds., Aspects of the Orange Revolution III: The Context and Dynamics of the 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Elections. Stutt gart: ibidem-Verlag. Herron, Erik S., and
Fredrik Sjöberg. 2016. “The Impact of‘Boss’ Candidates and Local Political Machines on Elections in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 16 (6): 985-1002. Herron, Erik S., Michael Thunberg, and Nazar Boyko. 2015. "Crisis Management and Adaptation in Wartime Elections: Ukraine’s 2014 Snap Presidential and Parliamentary Elections.” Electoral Studies 40 (December): 419-29. Herron, Michael C., and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2003. “Overvoting and Representation: An Examination of Overvoted Presidential Ballots in Broward and MiamiDade Counties.” Electoral Studies 22 (1): 21-47. Herzog, Hanna. 1987. “Minor Parties: The Relevancy Perspective.” Comparative Politics 19: 317-29. Heywood, Paul, and Jan-Henrik Meyer-Sahling. 2013. “Danger Zones of Cor ruption: How Management of the Ministerial Bureaucracy Affects Cor ruption Risks in Poland.” Public Administration and Development 33:191֊ 204. Holland, Alisha C. 2017. Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics ofInformal Wel fare in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Howard, Marc Morje. 2002. “The Weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society’ Jour nal of Democracy 13 (1): 157-69.
212 BIBLIOGRAPHY Huber, J. D. 2000. “Delegation to Civil Servants in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal ofPolitical Research 37:397-413. Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michi gan Press. IFES. 2005. Public Opinion in Ukraine—November 2005. Washington, DC: IFES. IFES. 2008. Dissatisfaction Disillusionment in Ukraine: Findings from an IFES 2008 Survey. Washington, DC: IFES. IFES. 2014. Public Opinion in Ukraine 2014. Washington, DC: IFES. IFES. 2015. Key Findings June 2015 Survey in Ukraine. Washington, DC: IFES. Ishchenko, Volodymyr. 2016. “Far Right Participation in the Ukrainian Maidan Protests: An Attempt of Systematic Estimation.” European Politics and Society 17 (4): 453-72. Ishiyama, John T„ and Ryan Kennedy. 2001. “Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.” Europe-Asia Studies 53 (8): 1177-91. James, Martin O. 2002. Congressional Oversight. New York: Nova Science Publish ers. Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press. Johannes, John R. 1983. “Political Culture 8c Congressional Constituency Service.” Polity 15 (4): 555-72. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. 2014. “The Institutional Roots of Anti-Corruption Policies: Comparing the Three Baltic States.” Journal of Baltic Studies 42 (3): 329-46. Johnston, Michael. 2013. “More than Necessary, Less than Sufficient: Democratiza tion and the Control of Corruption.” Social Research 80 (4):
1237-58. Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in PostSoviet Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Juška, Arūnas, and Peter Johnstone. 2004. “The Symbiosis of Politics and Crime in Lithuania.” Journal ofBaltic Studies 35 (4): 346-59. Kairiene, Ingrida. 2013. “Corruption Manifestations in Lithuania’s Police.” Unpub lished manuscript. Accessed online: https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/14925 Karklins, Rasma. 2005. The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-Communist Societies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Karv, Jaanus. 2015. “E-Government and Its Ability to Reduce Corruption: The Case of Estonia.” Department of Political Science, Lund University. Accessed online: http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/5425282 Key, V. 0.1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell. Khmelko, Irina S., and Daniel J. Beers. 2011. “Legislative Oversight in the Ukrai nian Rada: Assessing the Effectiveness of Parliamentary Committees.” Journal ofLegislative Studies 17 (4): 501-24. Khmelko, Irina S., Charles R. Brown, and Trevor L. Wise. 2010. “Committees and
BIBLIOGRAPHY 213 Legislative Strengthening: The Growing Influence of Committees in Ukraine's Legislative Process.” Journal ofLegislative Studies 16 (1): 73-95. King, Anthony. 1976. “Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 1 (1): 11-36. King, Charles. 2004. “A Rose Among Thorns—Georgia Makes Good.” Foreign Af fairs 83 (2): 13-18. King, Gary. 1991. “Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage.” British Jour nal of Political Science 21 (1): 119-28. Klasnja, Marko, Joshua Tucker, and Kevin Deegan-Krause. 2016. “Pocketbook vs. So ciotropic Corruption Voting.” British Journal ofPolitical Science 46 (1): 67-94. Knott, Jack H., and Gary J. Miller. 1987. Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of In stitutional Choice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kubicek, Paul. 2002. “Civil Society, Trade Unions and Post-Soviet Démocratisation: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (4): 603-24. Kuhn, Gabriel. 2010. Life Under the Jolly Roger: Reflections on Golden Age Piracy. Oakland, CA: PM Press. Kupatadze, Alexander. 2012. “Explaining Georgia’s Anti-Corruption Drive.” Euro pean Security 21 (1): 16-36. Kuzio, Taras, ed. 2009. Democratic Revolution in Ukraine: From Kuchmagate to Or ange Revolution. New York, Routledge. Kuzio, Taras. 2010. “Nationalism, Identity and Civil Society in Ukraine: Under standing the Orange Revolution.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 285-96. Kuzio, Taras. 2014 “Impediments to the Emergence of Political Parties in Ukraine.” Politics 34 (4): 309-23. Kuzio,
Taras. 2015. “Rise and Fall of the Party of Regions Political Machine.” Prob lems ofPost-Communism 62:174-86. KIIS (Kyiv International Institute of Sociology). 2015. Corruption in Ukraine: Com parative Analysis of Surveys, 2007,2009, 2011, 2015. Kyiv: KIIS. Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge. Langseth, Peter. 2007. “Measuring Corruption.” In C. Sampford, A. Shaddock, C. Conners, and F. Galtung, eds., Measuring Corruption. Burlington: Ashgate. Lankina, Tornila, Claire Gordon, and Svitlana Slava. 2017. “Regional Development in Ukraine: Priority Actions in Terms of Decentralization.” European Union: European Committee on the Regions. Lapkin, A. 2017. “Spetsializovano antikorruptsiina prokuratura: problemy organizatstii ta diyalnosti.” Pravo Ukraini 2017 (1): 63-70. Ledeneva, Alena V. 2006. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types and Consequences.” An nual Review of Political Science 6:233-56. Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Ivan Molina. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
214 BIBLIOGRAPHY Leipnik, О., and S. Kyrychenko. 2013. “The Public Utilities War and Corruption in Ukraine” Post-Communist Economies 25 (2): 159-74. Lessig, Laurence. 2011. Republic Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It. New York: Twelve (Hachette). Light, Matthew. 2014. “Police Reforms in the Republic of Georgia: The Conver gence of Domestic and Foreign Policy in an Anti-corruption Drive.” Policing and Society 24 (3): 318-45. Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study ofTwenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lindberg, Staffan L, Anna Lührmann, and Valeriya Mechkova. 2017. World Devel opment Report 2017: From De-Jure to De-Facto: Mapping Dimensions and Se quences ofAccountability. World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/3245014 87592445304/Mapping-dimensions-and-sequences-of-accountability Luhrmann, Anna, Kyle L. Marquardt, and Valeriya Mechkova. 2017. “Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountabil ity.” V-Dem Working Paper 2017: 46. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ab stract=2956464 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2956464 Lupia, Arthur. 2003. “Delegation and Its Perils.” In Kaare Strom, Wolfgang C. Muller, and Torbjörn Bergman, eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parlia mentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Maestas, Cherie. 2003. “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” Journal ofPolitics 65 (2): 439-56.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Christopher Weina. 2003. Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Massie, Robert K. 1980. Peter the Great: His Life and World. New York Modem Library. Materiały XIX Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii Kommunisticheskoi partii Sovetskogo Soyuza. 1988. Moscow: Politizdat. Matsuzato, Kimitaka. 2002. “Elites and the Party System of Zakarpattya Oblasť: Relations among Levels of Party Systems.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (8): 1267-99. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165-79. Mebane, Walter R. 2006. “Election Forensics: Vote Counts and Benforďs Lawľ Pa per presented at the 2006 Summer Meeting of the Political Methodology Soci ety, July. Mebane, Walter R„ and Kirill Kalinin. 2009. “Comparative Election Fraud Detec tion.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto. Available online, http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/ gov2126/files/mebane_russia_apsa09.pdf Meguid, B. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral For tunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 215 Meleshevich, Andrey A. 2007. Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries: A Compara tive Study ofPolitical Institutionalization in the Baltic States, Russia, and Ukraine. New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Michael, Bryane, Eleanor Kennon, and Jeppe Kroman Hansen. 2006. “The Future of Anti-Corruption Measures in Lithuania.” Viešoji Poitika ir Administravimas 16: 7-15. Mikhailov, V. V. 2000. Osobaya zona: Vybory v Tatarstane (Ulyanovsk, Kazan Branch of the International Assembly for the Protection of Rights). Miller, Gary J. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Miller, W„ A. Grødeland, and T. Koshechkina. 2000. A Culture of Corruption? Cop ing with Government in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press. Motyl, Alexander J. 1993. Dilemmas ofIndependence: Ukraine After Totalitarianism. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press. Müller, Wolfgang C. 1993. “Executive-Legislative Relations in Austria: 1945-1992.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18 (4): 467-94. Munck, Gerardo L., and Jay Verkuilen. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5-34. Myagkov, Mikhail, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 2001. “The Trail of Votes in Russia’s 1999 Duma and 2000 Presidential Elections.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34 (3): 353-70. Myagkov, M., P. Ordeshook, and D. Shakin. 2009. The Forensics of Election Fraud: Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Kaare Strøm. 2006. “Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and
Non-Partisan Cabinet Members in European De mocracies.” British Journal ofPolitical Science 36 (4): 619-43. Nichter, S. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 19-31. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal ofDemocracy 9 (3): 112-26. Onuch, Olga. 2014. “Who Were the Protesters?” Journal ofDemocracy 25 (3): 4451. Onuch, Olga. 2015. “EuroMaidan Protests in Ukraine: Social Media versus Social Networks.” Problems ofPost-Communism 62:217-35. Ordeshook, Peter C., and Olga V. Shvetsova. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal ofPolitical Science 38 (1): 100-123. Osipian, Ararat L. 2008. “Political Graft and Education Corruption in Ukraine: Compliance, Collusion, and Control” Demokratizatsiya 16 (4): 323-42. Osipian, Ararat. 2017. “University Autonomy in Ukraine: Higher Education Cor ruption and the State.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50 (3): 233-43. Ostrów, Joel M. 2000. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. Palidauskaite, Jolanta, Aive Pevkur, and Iveta Reinholde. 2010. “A Comparative Ap-
216 BIBLIOGRAPHY proach to Civil Service Ethics in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.” Journal ofBal tic Studies 41 (1): 45-71. Parker, Glenn R. 1989. “Looking Beyond Reelection: Revising Assumptions about the Factors Motivating Congressional Behavior.” Public Choice 63 (3): 237-52. Peisakhin, Leonid, and Arturas Rozenas. 2018. “Electoral Effects of Biased Media: Russian Television in Ukraine.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 535-50. Pelizzo, Ricardo, and Frederick Stapenhurst. 2013. Government Accountability and Legislative Oversight. New York: Routledge. Persson, Torsten, Gerard Roland, and Guido Tabellini. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability’ Quarterly Journal ofEconomics 112 (4): 1163-1202. Peterson, Paul E„ and Jay P. Greene. 1994. “Why Executive-Legislative Conflict in the United States Is Dwindling.” British Journal ofPolitical Science 24 (1): 33-55. Philip, Mark, and Elizabeth David-Barrett. 2015. “Realism about Political Corrup tion.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 387-402. Polese, Abel. 2009. “Ukraine 2004: Informal Networks, Transformation of Social Capital and Coloured Revolutions.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transi tion Politics 25 (2-3): 255-77. Pop-Eleches, Grigore, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2017. Communism’s Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Post, Lori Ann, Amber N. W. Raile, and Eric D. Raile. 2010. “Defining Political Will.” Politics Policy 38 (4): 653-76. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. 1999 Democracy, Ac
countability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Ahne: The Collapse and Revival of the American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Rafael-Lopez Pintor. 2000. Election Management Bodies as Institutions of Gover nance. United Nations Development Program, http://www.eods.eu/library/ UNDP.EIectoral%20Management%20Bodies%20as%20Institutions%20of%20 Governance.pdf Rentniek, David. 1997. Resurrection. New York: Random House. Reuter, Ora John. 2017. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richardson, Lilliard E., Jr., and Patricia K. Freeman. 1995. “Gender Differences in Constituency Service among State Legislators.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 169-79. Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Rockman, Bert A. 1984. “Legislative-Executive Relations and Legislative Over sight.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 387-440. Roeder, Philip. 1993. Red Sunset: The Failure ofSoviet Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 217 Rosas, Guillermo, Yael Shomer, and Stephen R. Haptonstahl. 2015. “No News Is News: Nonignorable Nonresponse in Roll-Call Data Analysis.” American Jour nal ofPolitical Science 59 (2): 511-28. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “The Poetical Economy of Corruption.” In K. A. El liott, ed. Corruption and the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute of In ternational Economics. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Bonnie J. Palifka. 2016. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Round, John, Colin C. Williams, and Peter Rodgers. 2008. “Corruption in the PostSoviet Workplace: The Experiences of Recent Graduates in Contemporary Ukraine.” Work, Employment, and Society 22 (1): 149-66. Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, and Sharon L. Wolchik, eds. 2009. Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Salmond, Robert. 2007. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Account ability Mechanisms Affect Citizens and Politics, PhD diss., UCLA. Sanders, Deborah. 2017. ‘“The War We Want; The War that We Get.’: Ukraine’s Mil itary Reform and the Conflict in the East.” Journal of Slavic Military Studies 30 (1): 30-49. Schedler, Andreas. 1999. “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Schedler, Andreas, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds. 1999. The SelfRestraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl. 1991. “What Democracy Is. and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy (Summer): 3-16. Schueth, Samuel. 2012. “Apparatus of Capture: Fiscal State Formation in the Repub lic of Georgia.” Political Geography 31:133-43. Schulze, Gunther G., and Bjorn Frank. 2003. “Deterrence Versus Intrinsic Motiva tion: Experimental Evidence on the Determinants of Corruptibility.” Economics of Governance 4:143-60. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper. Serra, George, and David Moon. 1994. “Casework, Issue Positions, and Voting in Congressional Elections: A District Analysis.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 200213. Sharma, Rakesh. 2003. Public Opinion in Ukraine 2002: Findings from and IFES Survey. Washington, DC: IFES. Shekhovtsov, Anton. 2011. “The Creeping Resurgence of the Radical Right? The Case of the Freedom Party.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (2): 203-28. Shekhovtsov, Anton, and Andreas Umland. 2014. “Ukraine’s Radical Right.” Journal of Democracy 25 (3): 58-63.
218 BIBLIOGRAPHY Shevel, Oxana. 2015. “The Parliamentary Elections in Ukraine, October 2014.” Elec toral Studies 39:159-63. Shugart, Matthew S., and John Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sobyanin, A. A., and V. G. Sukhovolskiy. 1995. Demokratiya, Ogranichennaya Falsifikatsiyami: Vybory i Referendumy v Rossii v 1991-1993 Gg. Moscow: Project Group for Human Rights. Stepanenko, Victor. 2006. “Civil Society in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic Ethos in the Framework of Corrupted Sociality.” East European Politics and Society 20 (4): 571-97. Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Poli tics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 315-25. Sung, Hung-En. 2003. “Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revis ited.” Social Forces 82 (2): 703-23. Swearer, Howard R. 1961. “The Functions of Soviet Elections.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 129-49. Szpiro, George. 2010. Numbers Rule: The Vexing Mathematics of Democracy, from Plato to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Taagepera, Rein. 2002. “Baltic Values and Corruption in Comparative Context.” Journal of Baltic Studies 33 (3): 243-58. Temple, Paul. 2006. “Universities Without Corruption: A New Approach for Geor gia’s Higher Education.” International Higher Education: 19-20. , Thames, Frank C. 2007. “Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998-2002.” Legislative Studies Quar terly 32 (2): 223-56. Thompson, Theresa, and Anwar Shah.
2005. “Transparency International’s Corrup tion Perceptions Index: Whose Perceptions Are They Anyway?” http://sitere sources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/TransparencyIn ternationalCorruptionIndex.pdf Tkachuk, A., O. Garan’, V. Khmelko, and O. Maiboroda. 2000. Ukrainskt Uvi: mizh Leninizmom і sotial-demokratieyu. Kyiv: KM Academia. Treisman, Daniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Empirical Research?” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 211-44. Tucker, Joshua A. 2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and the ‘Second Wave’ of Post-Communist Democratic Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 537-53. Udovychenko, Volodymyr, Anatoliy Melnychuk, Oleksiy Gnatiuk, and Pavlo Osta penko. 2017. “Decentralization Reform in Ukraine: Assessment of the Chosen Transformation Model.” European Spatial Research and Policy 24 (1): 23-40. Uppal, Yogesh. 2009. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Ef fects in Indian State Legislatures.” Public Choice 138 (1-2): 9-27.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 219 Vandenabeele, Wouter. 2007. “Toward a Public Administration Theory of Pubic Service Motivation.” Public Management Review 9: 545-56. Wagner, Markus. 2012. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845-64. Wand, Jonathan N. Kenneth W. Shotts, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Walter R. Mebane, Mi chael C. Herron, and Henry E. Brady. 2001. “The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 793-810. Way, Lucan. 2014. “Civil Society and Democratization.” Journal of Democracy 25 (3): 35-43. Whitmore, Sarah. 2004. State-Building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament 19902003. London: Routledge. Wilson, Andrew. 2000. The Ukrainians: Unexpected Nation. New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press. Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven: Yale University Press. Wilson, Andrew, and Artur Bilous. 1993. “Political Parties in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 45 (4): 693-703. Wilson, Andrew, and Sarah Birch. 1999. “Voting Stability, Political Gridlock: Ukraine’s 1998 Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (6): 1039-68. World Bank. n.d. “Accountability in Governance.” Available online: https://sitere sources.worldbank.org/PUBLICSECTORANDGOVERNANCE/Resources/ AccountabilityGovernance.pdf (last accessed on October 10,2018). World Bank. 2000. Anti-Corruption in Transition. Washington, DC: World Bank. Yamamoto, Hironori. 2007. Tools for Parliamentary Oversight: A Comparative Study of 88 National Parliaments. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2017. Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
INDEX XIXth All Union Conference of the CPSU, 34 XXVIIth Party Congress of the CPSU, 11,3234 Abromavičius, Aivaras, 96,197 Accountability as concept, 7-9,171-72 definition of, 7-9 diagonal, 5,14-17,30,43,102-123,170-71, 198nl0 in Eastern Europe, 10-13,178-80 in Estonia, 178-80 in Georgia, 174,177-80 horizontal, 5,5-17,30,43,80-101,123,148, 171,184,191n20,196n3 informal/formal rules, 2,7-8,11-13,172 in Latvia, 178-80 in Lithuania, 179-80 as practice, 7-10,25,180,190nl2,196n9 as punishment, 7-8,14,22,174 in Russia, 28,35-36,172-74 types of actors, 147,149-50,166-69,17477, 179-180,182,186-87 types of collective accountability, 17-19 types of individual accountability, 17-19 types of power, 33,125 types of reciprocal accountability, 19-20 types of relationships, 14,153,155 types of unidirectional accountability, 19-20 in Ukraine, 26-42,149-150,166-69,174֊ 77,179-80,182,186-87 vertical, 5,15-17,24, 30,33, 35,42-79,123, 171,203n8 Akhmetov, Rinat, 98 Anti-Corruption Court, 81,84,97,102 Anti-Corruption Institutions, 81,84,97, 99, 102,151 Armenia democracy in, 51,203n4 elections in, 51 Azerbaijan democracy in, 51 elections in, 51,57-58 Batkivshchyna. See Fatherland Belarus democracy in, 51,63 elections in, 51,106,173-74 Black Ledger, 99,109 Black PR, 24-25 Bloc of Petro Poroshenko. See Poroshenko Bloc Boyko, Yurii, 143,164-66 Bureaucracy and corruption, 10,31-32,178,180,183 need for, 70,127-31 party influence, 35-36,47,64,86,124-26 Weber and, 125-26,176,199n2 Cabinet of Ministers, 85,151-52,154,178 Central Electoral Commission (CEC), 49,5354,74, 112,127, 152, 158, 200n23 Chesno,
18,117,119-20 CIFRA Group, 53,122,131 Civil Oversight Council, 41 Civil Society, 2-3,5,28,30, 36,42-43,102-5, 121-22 Committee on the Prevention of Corruption, 151 Communist Party of the Soviet Union, 31-35, 61-62,67-68,148 Communist Party of Ukraine, 55-56,63,65, 68-70,88, 134-36,141, 197nl0 Congress of People’s Deputies, 11,31,34-35, 62,67 221
222 INDEX Corruption definition of, 23-26 effects on citizens, І6,22,24-26,28, Зі-35, 43,46-47, 50, 79, 96,108,114, 122-24, 152,166-72 effects on politicians, 22-23, 27, 37-38, 68, 72-73, 78-79, 96, 98, 100-101, 148,164, 166-67, 170-71,183-84 in Estonia, 174,176-77, 179-81 in Georgia, 41, 96,174,177-80,183 illegal behavior, 13, 24-25, 98,183-84, 201֊2n7 in Latvia, 174, 176-77,179-80 in Lithuania, 174,176-80 “normal behavior,” 2,12-14,18, 24-26,116, 121, 124,140, 146,170-71,180,186-87 normalization, 12,123,146,167 perpetrated by bureaucrats, 25,124,126-27, 178, 181-83 perpetrated by oligarchs, 3,35,98-101,148, 150-51, 155-56, 170 perpetrated by politicians, 22, 27, 37,60,66, 73,79, 96-98,100, 164-67, 169-71, 17981,184 in Russia, 16, 24-25, 28-29, 36, 39-40, 64, 98-99, 174,187,193nl7, 203n4 Transparency International and corruption, 23, 27-29, 201Ш in Ukraine, 2-6, 23, 26-29, 31, 35-43,7879, 81, 95-101,108,121-23, 127,147-49, 151, 155-56, 167-70,172,174, 179,181֊ 82, 185-87, 190nl0,192nn6-ll, 201nl, 202nn8-9 CPSU. See Communist Party of the Soviet Union CPU. See Communist Party of Ukraine Crimea, 2, 27, 39-40, 50, 58-59, 69, 71, 76-77, 129, 173, 176,185,187,198n22, 202nl8 Decembrist Revolt, 11 Democracy definition of, 9-10 egalitarian, 26-27 electoral, 26-27 liberal, 26-27 participatory, 26-27 prerequisites, 26-31 quality of, 10, 27,123, 174 USSR implementation, 31-36,61 Deputy requests definition of, 5 horizontal accountability, 80-81,85-94, 100-101 institutional targets, 91-92 time to response/satisfaction, 92-95 4th Convocation, 80, 84, 86-87 8th Convocation, 80, 87,
90-92, 94 Donbas, 2, 27, 40,49, 58-59,69, 71, 76-78, 107,129,173, 176,185,187, 198n22 Donetsk, 37, 40, 53, 156, 160-62 e-declarations cash assets, 97, 149-50, 166-67,171 definition of, 41,149, 153 property, 156-58,164 Election administration, 3, 5,41, 51, 77,108, 110,113,121-28,133,135,142-44,146֊ 47,170-72, 182-83,186,194n5 Election fraud OSCE, 48-50,110,192nl0 Azerbaijan and, 51, 58 digit distribution tests and, 56-59 Frank Benford and, 56-59 Georgia and, 59, 183 malpractice, 47 media bias, 49 turnout and, 54, 57-59,63,66, 144,19ІПІ8, 194nl6 voter coercion, 49 Election Management Bodies (EMBs), 30,42, 113,122, 124, 128,130-31,133,143, 147 Election observation Committee for Open Democracy, 52-53 domestic observers, 38, 48,50,56, 110-13 Elect UA, 50, 114-15 international observers, 38,48,50, 53,56, 110-12, 129,184 Maidan Monitoring, 50,114-15 OSCE, 48-50,110, 192nl0 Elections campaigns and, 82, 88, 98,109, 123, 146, 181 in 1994, 36,63-64, 67-68, 70, 75-76,129, 195n20 in 1998,48-49,64, 67, 70-71, 74-76,129, 191n24 in 2002, 37, 49, 55-56, 58, 64-65, 67, 69-70, 72,74-76, 80, 84, 87, 191n24 in 2004, 37-39,49-50, 59,65, 71-72, 76,78, 84,111,121,132 in 2010, 2,27-28, 39,42-43, 48-49, 58-59,
INDEX 65, 71, 76, 83-84,113, 130, 139, 145-47, 186,196ոՅՅ, 201ո27 in 2012,49-50, 53, 57-58,65, 67, 74-76, 78, 111, 113-14,134-36,139-40, 145, 201ո27 in 2014, 27, 38-42,49, 51,53-54, 58,65, 67-68, 71, 74-76, 83, 87,89-90,111, 117, 129-32,139-140,142-45, 147,171, 195ո21, 200ո9, 201ո27 İn 2019, 3, 16, 18, 41-43, 49, 51, 53-54, 58, 66-67, 71-73, 76-79, 96, 100-101, 111, 138,146, 152,168,179, nl94 Electoral commissions, 49, 58,128-31, 134, 186, 194n9,194nl2 Electoral Integrity Project, 51-52 Electoral precincts, 6,16, 50, 53, 55-59, 111, 113-14,128,130,144,183 Electoral system in Ukraine, 18,51, 60-70, 7579, 84, 98, 123,129, 169, 181-82,186, 191n24,193nl2 Estonia anti-corruption institutions in, 176-77,181 corruption in, 177,179-180, 203nl2 democracy in, 62,174-75, 182 elections in, 51-53 Euromaidan, 2-3,5-6, 28, 39,41-43, 59,65, 71-72, 80-81, 84, 87, 89-91, 93, 95-96, 98,101,103,105,107, 111, 121-22, 148, 151, 166, 168,170,172-73,184, 186, 195n32 European Solidarity See Poroshenko Bloc European Union (EU), 39,105,176 Extremism, 57, 59,72,107 Fatherland Party, 70, 72, 89,119-20, 134, 165 First-past-the-post (FPTP) System, 63,66 For a United Ukraine Bloc, 55, 69-71, 136, 197nl0 Freedom Party, 70,72, 91,135-36 Georgia anti-corruption institutions in, 177-80 corruption in, 41,178, 183 democracy in, 96,173-74,181 elections in, 51-53, 57-58, 194nl6 Rose Revolution, 177-78 Gorbachev, Mikhail, 11, 32-36, 61,103 Groysman, Volodymyr, 96, 164-65 Incumbency, 5, 32,49, 59-61, 73-74, 87-93, 183 223 Jaresko, Natalia, 96 Katerenchuk, Mykolą, 86 Kazakhstan democracy in, 173 elections in, 51-53
Khrushchev, Nikita, 32 Kinakh, Anatolii, 69 Knopkodavsto. See proxy voting Kolomoyskyi, Ihor, 3, 98, 100 Kompromat, 12-13,24 Kravchuk, Leonid, 36, 62, 76 Krugovaya poruka, 24-25 Kuchma, Leonid, 36-39, 64-65,69, 76, 83-84, 87-88,103-4,121, 194nl0 Kvitashvili, Alexander, 96 Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 5253,131, 151, 202nn8-9 Kyrgyzstan democracy in, 203n3 elections in, 52-53 Latvia anti-corruption institutions in, 176-77, 179-80 corruption in, 174-75 democracy in, 62 elections in, 53 Law on the Prevention of Corruption, 96-97, 154 Law on the Status of People’s Deputies, 85, 198nl3 Lithuania anti-corruption institutions in, 176-77, 179-80 corruption in, 174-75,184 democracy in, 62,64,174 elections in, 53 Luhansk, 40, 59,155, 161 Liashko, Oleh, 164-66 Lytvyn, Volodymyr, 69-70,76 Manafort, Paul, 38, 99-100 Másol, Vitalii, 103 Mixed-member majoritarian (МММ) system, 60,63-65, 67, 70 Mixed-member electoral system, 63-64,7576,19ІП24 . Moldova democracy in, 174, 203n3 elections in, 52-53
224 INDEX Moroz, Anatolil, 87 Moroz, Oleksandr, 38,69 Quid pro quo, 126,132-33,144,147, 192n5 National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), 41-42,81,84,97, 99-101,151 Narodnyi Rukh. See People’s Movement Negative ballots, 61,63,133 Radical Party, 70,89,91,119-20,136, 165 Revolution of Dignity. See Euromaidan Revolution on Granite, 103 Right-wing extremists, 72,107 Russia corruption in, 16,24-25,28-29,36, 39-40, 64,98-99,174,187,193nl7,203n4 democracy in, 10-13,28-29,174,185 elections in, 12,16,51,64,98-99 Oligarchs and accountability, 95,98-101,148,150-51, 155-56, 170,204n21 definition of, 35 Open-List Proportional Representation (OLPR) system, 66 Opposition Bloc, 70-71,75,89,119-20,165, 185 Opposition Platform-For Life, 70-71,185 Orange Revolution, 2-3,5,16,26,28,37-40, 43, 51, 59,64,69, 72, 78, 82-84, 87-95, 100-104, 113,121,132, 151, 168,170, 173; 191n23, 195n24 Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 48-50,110,192nl0 Osyka, Serhii, 86 Our Ukraine, 55-56,70,72,134,136,140-41, 191n24,194nl5,197nl0 Oversight. See Accountability Parliament. See Verkhovna Rada Party of Regions, 38,58,70-71, 75, 90,95, 99, ПО, 117,134,136,140-43, 170, 185, 195n21, 197nl0 Party system in Ukraine, 5-6,18,31, 35-36, 38,42,45,60, 62-67,69, 72-73, 75-76, 78-79, 87, 98,108,123,142-43, 169,182 Peoples Movement, 68-69,71-72,104,137, 141 Peoples Front, 70-71,92,119-20 Pinchuk, Viktor, 69,98 Polling stations. See Electoral precincts PORA/OPORA, 104,111-12,197n4 Poroshenko Bloc, 70,72,75,89, 91, 119-20, 137,141 Poroshenko, Petro, 23,40,72,75-76,89,91, 98, 101-2,119, 143, 148,164 Pravyi
Sektor, 72,107 Principal-Agent Theory, 10,46,102,194n4 Proxy voting, 5-6,103,116-21,123,148,168, 170, 183-84, 199nn25-27 Public opinion data. See Survey data Putin, Vladimir, 39,187,193n21 Saakashvili, Mikheil, 96,177-79 Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), 97,99 Schumpeter, Joseph, 9 Selectorate, 11,20,32 Self-Reliance Party, 70, 89,119-20 Servant of the People Party, 3, 70,72,168,182, 184,204nl9 Shaimiev, Minitimir, 16,191nl8 Single-seat districts (SSD), 62-64, 74, 76,90, 136-38 Socialist Party of Ukraine (SPU), 69 Soviet Union, 11,31-36, 42,61-62,82, 103-4,150,175-76,193nl4,193nl7, 193nl9 Stalin, Joseph, 21-32, 61 Subject of the electoral process, 134,138 Suprun, Liudmyla, 71 Suprun, Ulana, 96,186,197nll Survey data, 48, 50,53-54,77,105,153, 194nn7֊8,194ППІ1-12,200nl0, 200nl8, 200n24,201n27,202nn9-10 Svoboda Party. See Freedom Party Tajikistan democracy in, 173 elections in, 51 Technical candidates. See Technical parties Technical parties commissioner replacement, 133-35,13842,170-71, 200n23 definition of, 6,128,199n4 overreliance on, 142-44,146-48,183-84, 186,195n21 Tihipko, Serhii, 143 Tomenko, Mykolą, 117 Trepak, Viktor, 99
INDEX Turkmenistan democracy in, 173,203ո4 elections in, 51 Tymoshenko Bloc. See Fatherland Tymoshenko, Yuliia, 16,38-39,59,69,72,143, • 146,164-66, 186,197nl0 Ukraine accountability in, 1-6,18,20-21,23,26-28, 31, 35-36,40-43,45, 49-53, 59-60, 6367,73-76,78-85,95,97-103,108,116, 121-23, 149-50, 153,164, 167-70, 17274,179,182,186-87 constitution in, 36-37,39,42-43,63,65, 82-85, 89, 122,19ІПІ7, 195n20 corruption in, 2-6, 23, 26-29, 31, 35-43, 78-79, 81, 95-101,108, 121-23, 127, 147-49,151,155-56, 167-70, 172, 174, 179,181-82,185-87,190nl0, 192nn611,201nl, 202nn8-9 democracy in, 26-28,123,185,192n9 procurement processes, 150 state capacity in, 35-36,62,83,108,149 technical parties in, 6, 128,133,135,138, 140-43,147-48, 168, 170,186, 195n21 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), 11,31,33, 35-36,62,68, 195n20 Uzbekistan corruption in, 34,203n4 democracy in, 33-34,173 elections in, 51 Valyuta, 148 Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM), 26,174, 203n4 Verkhovna Rada, 3, 5-6,27-28,37-43, 49-50, 53, 55-56, 58-59,62-63,65-67, 71, 73, 76, 78-80, 82-89, 91-93, 95-96, 98-99, 101, 103, 116-17, 119-21, 123,128-30,134-36,140,142-43, 145, 151-52, 155, 159,170, 198nl4, 199nl Voice (Party), 70 Weber, Max, 125-26,176,199n2 Whips, 116-17 World Values Survey (WVS), 105-6 Yanukovych, Viktor 2004 election, 28, 37-40,65, 71, 111 Euromaidan and, 40-43,65,95,103,121- 22 Orange Revolution and, 2, 59,83-84,88, 100,133,170 Yushchenko, Viktor, 16, 37-39,69,72,76, 132-33 Zakazukha, 24 Zelenskyy, Volodymyr, 3,41-42,51,72,76-77, 100-101, 117,152, 168-70, 183-84, 194n9 Bayerische) Staatsbibliothek v München 225
Į |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Herron, Erik S. 1968- |
author_GND | (DE-588)1159541671 |
author_facet | Herron, Erik S. 1968- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Herron, Erik S. 1968- |
author_variant | e s h es esh |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047091917 |
classification_rvk | MG 82080 MD 7200 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1238068518 (DE-599)BVBBV047091917 |
discipline | Politologie |
discipline_str_mv | Politologie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04681nam a2200697 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047091917</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230320 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210118s2020 a||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780472132140</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-472-13214-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1238068518</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047091917</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 82080</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122865:12045</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MD 7200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122538:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herron, Erik S.</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1159541671</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Normalizing corruption</subfield><subfield code="b">failures of accountability in Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="c">Erik S. Herron</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ann Arbor</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Michigan Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">x, 225 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Karte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Accountability is a crucial feature of every successful democratic system, and the failure to develop functioning mechanisms of accountability has undermined democratic consolidation efforts worldwide. This book advances the idea that reliable tools to hold officials accountable are essential for democratic governance and that one of the key threats to accountability comes from corrupt practices, especially when they are integrated - or normalized - in the day-to-day activities of institutions. It evaluates the successes and failures of institutions, politicians, political parties, bureaucracies, and civil society by focusing on the experiences of contemporary Ukraine. While the book details the case of Ukraine, the topic is directly relevant for countries that have experienced democratic backsliding and those that are at risk. Normalizing Corruption addresses several interconnected questions about the development of accountability in its chapters: Under what circumstances do incumbents lose elections? How well do party organizations encourage cohesive behavior? Is executive authority responsive to inquiries from public organizations and other government institutions? How can citizens influence government actions? Do civil servants conduct their duties as impartial professionals, or are they beholden to other interests? The research builds upon extensive fieldwork, data collection, and data analysis conducted since 1999"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verwaltung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063317-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verantwortlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187523-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zivilgesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7668631-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Korruption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032524-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Government accountability / Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political corruption / Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democratization / Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ukraine / Politics and government / 1991-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democratization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Government accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Politics and government</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Since 1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Korruption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032524-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Verwaltung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063317-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zivilgesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7668631-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Verantwortlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187523-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, ebk</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-472-12714-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20210312</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032498453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">351.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | Ukraine |
id | DE-604.BV047091917 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T16:19:55Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:02:20Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780472132140 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032498453 |
oclc_num | 1238068518 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 |
physical | x, 225 Seiten Illustrationen, Karte |
psigel | BSB_NED_20210312 |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | University of Michigan Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies series |
spelling | Herron, Erik S. 1968- Verfasser (DE-588)1159541671 aut Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine Erik S. Herron Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 2020 x, 225 Seiten Illustrationen, Karte txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies series "Accountability is a crucial feature of every successful democratic system, and the failure to develop functioning mechanisms of accountability has undermined democratic consolidation efforts worldwide. This book advances the idea that reliable tools to hold officials accountable are essential for democratic governance and that one of the key threats to accountability comes from corrupt practices, especially when they are integrated - or normalized - in the day-to-day activities of institutions. It evaluates the successes and failures of institutions, politicians, political parties, bureaucracies, and civil society by focusing on the experiences of contemporary Ukraine. While the book details the case of Ukraine, the topic is directly relevant for countries that have experienced democratic backsliding and those that are at risk. Normalizing Corruption addresses several interconnected questions about the development of accountability in its chapters: Under what circumstances do incumbents lose elections? How well do party organizations encourage cohesive behavior? Is executive authority responsive to inquiries from public organizations and other government institutions? How can citizens influence government actions? Do civil servants conduct their duties as impartial professionals, or are they beholden to other interests? The research builds upon extensive fieldwork, data collection, and data analysis conducted since 1999"-- Verwaltung (DE-588)4063317-2 gnd rswk-swf Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd rswk-swf Verantwortlichkeit (DE-588)4187523-0 gnd rswk-swf Zivilgesellschaft (DE-588)7668631-0 gnd rswk-swf Korruption (DE-588)4032524-6 gnd rswk-swf Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd rswk-swf Government accountability / Ukraine Political corruption / Ukraine Democratization / Ukraine Ukraine / Politics and government / 1991- Democratization Government accountability Political corruption Politics and government Ukraine Since 1991 Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 g Korruption (DE-588)4032524-6 s Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 s Verwaltung (DE-588)4063317-2 s Zivilgesellschaft (DE-588)7668631-0 s Verantwortlichkeit (DE-588)4187523-0 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, ebk 978-0-472-12714-6 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register |
spellingShingle | Herron, Erik S. 1968- Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine Verwaltung (DE-588)4063317-2 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Verantwortlichkeit (DE-588)4187523-0 gnd Zivilgesellschaft (DE-588)7668631-0 gnd Korruption (DE-588)4032524-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4063317-2 (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4187523-0 (DE-588)7668631-0 (DE-588)4032524-6 (DE-588)4061496-7 |
title | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine |
title_auth | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine |
title_exact_search | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine |
title_exact_search_txtP | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine |
title_full | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine Erik S. Herron |
title_fullStr | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine Erik S. Herron |
title_full_unstemmed | Normalizing corruption failures of accountability in Ukraine Erik S. Herron |
title_short | Normalizing corruption |
title_sort | normalizing corruption failures of accountability in ukraine |
title_sub | failures of accountability in Ukraine |
topic | Verwaltung (DE-588)4063317-2 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Verantwortlichkeit (DE-588)4187523-0 gnd Zivilgesellschaft (DE-588)7668631-0 gnd Korruption (DE-588)4032524-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Verwaltung Politik Verantwortlichkeit Zivilgesellschaft Korruption Ukraine |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032498453&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herroneriks normalizingcorruptionfailuresofaccountabilityinukraine |