Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces
Византий и Византия провинциализм столицы и столичность провинции
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Körperschaft: | |
| Format: | Tagungsbericht Buch |
| Sprache: | Russian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sankt-Peterburg
Aletejja
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | 301 Seiten, 44 ungezählte Seiten Tafeln Illustrationen, Pläne |
| ISBN: | 9785001650317 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047033029 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210129 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 201127s2020 a||| |||| 10||| rus d | ||
| 020 | |a 9785001650317 |9 978-5-00165-031-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1224484100 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047033029 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 111 | 2 | |a Meždunarodnaja konferencija"Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii" |d 2017 |c Moskau |j Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1222290944 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |6 880-03 |a Vizantij i Vizantija |b provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |c pod redakciej A.Vinogradova i S. Ivanova |
| 246 | 1 | 1 | |a Byzantion and Byzantium |
| 264 | 1 | |6 880-04 |a Sankt-Peterburg |b Aletejja |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 301 Seiten, 44 ungezählte Seiten Tafeln |b Illustrationen, Pläne | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 546 | |a Text russisch. Zusammenfassungen in englischer Sprache | ||
| 546 | |b Kyrillische Schrift | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Hauptstadt |0 (DE-588)4127960-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Regionalismus |0 (DE-588)4049037-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Byzantinisches Reich |0 (DE-588)4009256-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Konstantinopel |0 (DE-588)4073697-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |y 2017 |z Moskau |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Byzantinisches Reich |0 (DE-588)4009256-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Hauptstadt |0 (DE-588)4127960-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Konstantinopel |0 (DE-588)4073697-0 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Regionalismus |0 (DE-588)4049037-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |6 880-01 |a Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič |d 1976- |0 (DE-588)137962479 |4 aut |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |6 880-02 |a Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič |d 1956- |0 (DE-588)121910482 |4 aut |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 880 | 1 | |6 700-01/(N |a Виноградов, Андрей Юрьевич |4 edt | |
| 880 | 1 | |6 700-02/(N |a Иванов, Сергей Аркадьевич |4 edt | |
| 880 | 1 | 0 | |6 245-03/(N |a Византий и Византия |b провинциализм столицы и столичность провинции |c под редакцией А.Виноградова и С. Иванова |
| 880 | 1 | |6 264-04/(N |a Санкт-Петербург |b Алетейя |c 2020 | |
| 940 | 1 | |f sla | |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20210129 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032440260 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 709 |e 22/bsb |g 398 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |g 398 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 900 |e 22/bsb |g 398 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182006814212096 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Оглавление Пол Магдалино Каппадокия и Константинополь в VI в. (пер. О. Керзиной, А. Ляхович, Н. Сергеевой)........................іо Альбрехт Бергер «Переработка» Константинополя (пер. С. Матюниной, М. Пономаревой)...................................25 Халюк Четинкая Погребальные компартименты в
монастыре Пантократора .... 47 Филипп Нивенер Христианское искусство как провинциальное. «Центральность» провинциальных традиций в раннехристианских церковных постройках (пер. М. Володарского, Д. Ерофеевой, М. Журавлевой, А. Торрес-
Горбенко).................................................................. 57 Андрей Виноградов Афонский храм или арабский дворец? Крестово-купольный триконх и новая архитектурная идентичность империи......91 Михалис Каппас Архитектурный «идиолект» Фессалоники в средне- и поздневизантийские
периоды: сходства и различия с Константинополем (пер. В. Махмутова, И. Орловой, А. Старцевой)....................127 Анна Захарова Искусство X века: Константинополь и Каппадокия............154 Толга Уяр Рельефы, росписи и надписи в поздневизантийском сакральном пространстве: новое открытие Безирана
Килисе (Перистрема, Каппадокия) (пер. А. Вотевой, Н. Пелезневой, Е. Плотниковой)..............175
Сергей Иванов Антоний Новгородец и его экскурсовод в Константинополе ....203 Беатриче Даскас «Veneţia hebbe principio per la destnition della grande Trogia». Миф о Венеции как Alterum Byzantium...... 236 Дмитрий Черноглазое Письмовники и собрания образцовых писем: эпистолярная теория в эпоху Палеологов..............................250 Резюме................................................................................................ 282 Summaries........................................................................................... 289 Список иллюстраций........................................................................295
Summaries Magdalino P. Cappadocia and Constantinople in the Sixth Century This paper is a case study in Byzantine regionalism, here under stood as the political impact of a provincial area on the governing regime of a centralised state. Cappadocia, broadly defined, impinged on Constantinople in Late Antiquity by the fame of its three native Church Fathers (Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa and Gregory of Nazianzos) and by the presence of large imperial estates devoted to stock rearing. From the seventh to tenth centuries, Cappadocia was the central sector in the empire’s heavily militarised eastern frontier zone, and as such the home of a military elite who became influential and briefly dominant in imperial politics during the tenth century. Be tween these two phases, on the eve of the Arab conquest, the region enjoyed a brief if exaggerated notoriety as the birthplace of emperors. This was mainly due to the emperor Maurice (582-602), whose ori gins in Arabissos in eastern Cappadocia contrasted sharply with the European, mainly Balkan, provenance of previous imperial dynasties. Maurice rose to power on the back of a large Cappadocian network in the fiscal administration, and he consolidated his power by the sys tematic promotion of his family. Their massive enrichment, as well as the expensive rebuilding of Arabissos, at a time of great strain on the imperial budget, undoubtedly contributed to Maurice’s unpopularity and overthrow. Berger A. Recycling Constantinople This paper investigates the use of spolia in mediaeval Constan tinople in the rebuilding of the Great
Palace and several churches in the ninth century, in the late-Byzantine construction of a fortress near
290 Summary the Golden Gate, and the tenth-century decoration of the gate itself. It also discusses the use of older sarcophagi for imperial burials, and ad dresses the question whether the concept of a historising architecture existed in Byzantine Constantinople. Niewöhner Ph. Christian art as provincial art. The centrali ty of the provinces in early Christian church building Late antique or early Christian church building appears to have been significantly more varied from province to province and region to region than earlier Roman or later Byzantine art and architecture. Most early Christian churches adhered to local traditions rather than emulating Rome or Constantinople, the ‘New Rome’. This centrality of the provinces would seem to constitute an essential trait of early Christian art that sets it apart from the more integrated arts of the earlier Roman and later Byzantine periods. Whilst Romanisation may have paved the way for Christianisation, most early Christian church buildings appear to express local identities rather than alle giance to Rome or Constantinople. The resultant variety was abol ished again after the collapse of pan-Mediterranean rule, when the Byzantine empire was reduced to little more than Asia Minor and the Iconoclast controversy resulted in a standardisation of Orthodox art. Çetinkaya H. Funeral spaces in Pantokratotr monastery Recent restorations on the Pantokrator monastic complex yiel ded enormous results unknown prior to the excavation-restoration activity. These include a substructure below the Northern church in the shape of the
church above; an annexed funeral chapel, half excavated, attached to the Southern church. Among other novelties on site observations indicate a probable burial ground for the clergy and imperial family members in the Southwestern part of the church complex. Vinogradov A. Athonite church or Arabian palace? Crossin-square triconch and the new architectural identity of the Empire The question of the origin of the triconch of “Athonite type” — an inscribed cross on 4 free-standing supports with additional apses from the south and north — still causes a heated debate in the scholarship.
Summary 291 The purpose of this article is to draw attention to monuments of this type outside the Balkans. It is very likely that the Triconch hall and the church of the Archangel Michael, built for the Emperor Theophilos by Ioannes Grammatikos and the architect Patrikios, had probably such a plan, possibly following an Arabic model, which, in turn, goes back to the Late Antique examples. The early churches of this type in Asia Minor (Islamköy and Sarıca Kilise), dating to the early 10th century, show its common and “prestigious” character, which led to its spread not only to the Balkans, but also to Russia. Kappas M. The architectural idiom of Thessaloniki during the Middle and Late Byzantine Periods: similarities and dif ferences from Constantinople In this essay the author attempt to focus on Thessaloniki’s most important standing monuments from the Middle and Late Byzantine periods, and, given that their similarities with Constantinople have al ready been highlighted enough, I shall stress where they depart from Constantinopolitan practices. Thessaloniki was indeed more influ enced by the architecture of the capital than any other city in Greece. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the structural and morphologi cal data reveals that as early as the Middle Byzantine period the city’s building workshops had managed to assimilate Constantinopolitan features and treat them in their own way, probably based on the local architectural tradition, which had its roots in the construction acti vity of the Transitional period. In subsequent centuries, and above all around
1300 the Thessalonian master builders skilfully merged mor phological elements from their rich local architectural heritage with practices and solutions originating mainly in Constantinople but also from other artistic centres, basically from the Despotate of Epirus or the Nicaea of the Laskarids. This creative osmosis gave the archi tecture of Thessaloniki its own peculiar identity, vividly captured in the dozens of monuments attributed to the activity of Thessalonian craftsmen. Zakharova A. Byzantine art of the 10th c.: Constantinople and Cappadocia The paper investigates some major tendencies in the 10th century Byzantine painting. The author analyzes some wall paintings in the
292 Summary cave churches of Cappadocia in comparison to the works of metropol itan art, such as illuminated manuscripts and fragments of mosaics. Two 10th century Cappadocian ensembles stand out as they show the strongest metropolitan influence: Kılıçlar church and especially the New Tokalı church in Göreme. The paper explores how the impulse given by these ensembles was further developed in local milieu in the first and in the second half of the 10th century respectively and to what extent the painting style in Cappadocia corresponded to the general lines of development in the art of Constantinople and Byzantium on the whole. Uyar T. B. Carving, Painting, and Inscribing Sacred Space in Late Byzantium: Bezirana Kilisesi Rediscovered (Peristrema-Cappadocia) The “Byzantine” paintings of Bezirana Kilisesi are not exceptional in late thirteenth-century Cappadocian artistic production under Is lamic rule, as they were executed by the same artist who also worked on another late thirteenth-century monument, Yüksekli Kilise 1. Fur thermore, the Bezirana/Yüksekli workshop is also linked to another group of closely interconnected murals in the second half of the thir teenth century. Although not as exceptional as the paintings of Be zirana/Yüksekli, these similar paintings aspire to reproduce late Byz antine fashions in regard to complex visual, textual, commemorative, and intercessory performances within the sacred space. A comprehen sive investigation across the late medieval painted programs in Cap padocia shows how the fashioning of sacred space involved forging close
links between the deceased and the living (both clerics and laypeople), as well as between decoration, commemoration, and the idea of protection, thus replicating the construction process of late Byzan tine cultural identity. A systematic inquiry into the sacred character of these church spaces thereby challenges commonly accepted notions of center and periphery in the cultural production and communal iden tity of Cappadocia in opposition to the rest of the Byzantine Empire at this period. Although the carved, painted, and inscribed environment of Bezirana Kilisesi is a product of the “post-Byzantine” social and cul tural context, the result represents one the of the finest and most opu lent late Byzantine sacred spaces.
Summary 293 Ivanov S. Anthony of Novgorod and His Byzantine Guide In this article, “Kniga Palomnik” is analyzed as an entwinement of two different formats: a standard narrative offered by a guide through Constantinople, and his answers to Anthony’s unexpected questions. The guide’s “voice” is clearly discernible thanks to the Graecisms pop ping up in the Old Russian text (they appear to be more numerous than Chr. Loparev, the publisher of the text, thought), but also due to numerous stereotyped “tour-guide gimmicks” that are accurately reproduced by the author. Yet, in some cases the pilgrim obviously in terrupts the guide by asking meaningful questions that the guide has to answer, thus breaking off his smooth flow of speech. A performa tive analysis helps clarify some unresolved problems posed by “Kniga palomnik”, including the topographical ones. Daskas B. ‘Veneţia hebbe principio per la destrution del la grande Trogia’. A note on the myth of Venice as alterum Byzantium The issue in this paper is the relationship between Byzantium and Venice as elaborated in the so-called ‘myth of Venice’, the repertoire of legends found in Venetian historiographical and rhetorical writings, which molds and fabricates the city’s past. Over the course of its histo ry, Venice developed strong and complex ties to Byzantium, drawing on the authority of the eastern imperial capital to legitimize its trade and economic ambitions across the Mediterranean. Even if the use of Byzantium as a reference point in Venetian cultural politics and artis tic production (e.g. the Basilica of San
Marco) has been evident across the centuries, within the shifting patterns of its legends of origin, its presence is apparently dissimulated, almost reduced to absence. It is during the thirteenth century that this attitude changes: having consolidated its role in the Levant as a result of the Fourth Crusade (1204), Venice proceeded to introduce into the creative reconstruction of its past new elements, overlaying its civic mythology with veiled ref erences to Byzantium. One of the traditional motifs of this mythology, about the city’s founding, is the Trojan legend. The illustrious model of the ancient city of Troy panders to Venice’s shifting political orien tations and propaganda, and aims at outlining, each time, paths that justify the prosperity of the city’s present and its providential history as opposed to its rivals (Padua, Rome, Constantinople). In the aftermath of the Fourth Crusade, the legend about the fire and sack of the
294 Summary ancient city of Troy and the ultimate flight of its inhabitants to the Lagoon, combined with an ingenious chronological reference for the city’s founding that hints at the moment when the Dogal sovereignty over part of the territories of the former Byzantine empire is official ly acknowledged in documents, shows a script of power politics that has Venice as heir of the βασιλεύουσα τοίν πόλεων, Constantinople. It is therefore as early as the thirteenth century that the concept of the Byzantine heritage of Venice — the myth of‘Venice as alterum Byzan tium’ as Cardinal Bessarion, later in the fifteenth century, put it — was laid down in its essential components, as a direct consequence of the impresa of 1204. Chernoglazov D. Letter writing manuals and model letter collections: epistolary theory in the Palaeologan period The aim of the present paper is to characterize the letter writing manuals and model letter collections, which were used by the Byzan tines during the Palaeologan period. The extant material is divided into three groups. The first group includes theoretical treatises going back to the late antique tradition. In these treatises, which were used primarily as school textbooks, letters are classified according to their purpose and content. The second group includes collections of authen tic letters, sometimes mixed with fictitious ones, where the material is distributed according to the same principles as in the treatises of the first group. The third group, much more extensive than the second, includes collections of letters and forms, which are
sorted according to the social status of the author and the addressee. Basically, these collections served as practical manuals for official correspondence. The second group is poorly represented in manuscripts. The first and the third, on the contrary, have an extensive manuscript tradition: the treatises of these groups were very common both in the capital and in provinces. Byzantine epistolary theory is conservative: different subgenres of letter writing manuals exist and develop independently, there are almost no texts at our disposal where different methods of letter classification are combined.
|
| adam_txt |
Оглавление Пол Магдалино Каппадокия и Константинополь в VI в. (пер. О. Керзиной, А. Ляхович, Н. Сергеевой).іо Альбрехт Бергер «Переработка» Константинополя (пер. С. Матюниной, М. Пономаревой).25 Халюк Четинкая Погребальные компартименты в
монастыре Пантократора . 47 Филипп Нивенер Христианское искусство как провинциальное. «Центральность» провинциальных традиций в раннехристианских церковных постройках (пер. М. Володарского, Д. Ерофеевой, М. Журавлевой, А. Торрес-
Горбенко). 57 Андрей Виноградов Афонский храм или арабский дворец? Крестово-купольный триконх и новая архитектурная идентичность империи.91 Михалис Каппас Архитектурный «идиолект» Фессалоники в средне- и поздневизантийские
периоды: сходства и различия с Константинополем (пер. В. Махмутова, И. Орловой, А. Старцевой).127 Анна Захарова Искусство X века: Константинополь и Каппадокия.154 Толга Уяр Рельефы, росписи и надписи в поздневизантийском сакральном пространстве: новое открытие Безирана
Килисе (Перистрема, Каппадокия) (пер. А. Вотевой, Н. Пелезневой, Е. Плотниковой).175
Сергей Иванов Антоний Новгородец и его экскурсовод в Константинополе .203 Беатриче Даскас «Veneţia hebbe principio per la destnition della grande Trogia». Миф о Венеции как Alterum Byzantium. 236 Дмитрий Черноглазое Письмовники и собрания образцовых писем: эпистолярная теория в эпоху Палеологов.250 Резюме. 282 Summaries. 289 Список иллюстраций.295
Summaries Magdalino P. Cappadocia and Constantinople in the Sixth Century This paper is a case study in Byzantine regionalism, here under stood as the political impact of a provincial area on the governing regime of a centralised state. Cappadocia, broadly defined, impinged on Constantinople in Late Antiquity by the fame of its three native Church Fathers (Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa and Gregory of Nazianzos) and by the presence of large imperial estates devoted to stock rearing. From the seventh to tenth centuries, Cappadocia was the central sector in the empire’s heavily militarised eastern frontier zone, and as such the home of a military elite who became influential and briefly dominant in imperial politics during the tenth century. Be tween these two phases, on the eve of the Arab conquest, the region enjoyed a brief if exaggerated notoriety as the birthplace of emperors. This was mainly due to the emperor Maurice (582-602), whose ori gins in Arabissos in eastern Cappadocia contrasted sharply with the European, mainly Balkan, provenance of previous imperial dynasties. Maurice rose to power on the back of a large Cappadocian network in the fiscal administration, and he consolidated his power by the sys tematic promotion of his family. Their massive enrichment, as well as the expensive rebuilding of Arabissos, at a time of great strain on the imperial budget, undoubtedly contributed to Maurice’s unpopularity and overthrow. Berger A. Recycling Constantinople This paper investigates the use of spolia in mediaeval Constan tinople in the rebuilding of the Great
Palace and several churches in the ninth century, in the late-Byzantine construction of a fortress near
290 Summary the Golden Gate, and the tenth-century decoration of the gate itself. It also discusses the use of older sarcophagi for imperial burials, and ad dresses the question whether the concept of a historising architecture existed in Byzantine Constantinople. Niewöhner Ph. Christian art as provincial art. The centrali ty of the provinces in early Christian church building Late antique or early Christian church building appears to have been significantly more varied from province to province and region to region than earlier Roman or later Byzantine art and architecture. Most early Christian churches adhered to local traditions rather than emulating Rome or Constantinople, the ‘New Rome’. This centrality of the provinces would seem to constitute an essential trait of early Christian art that sets it apart from the more integrated arts of the earlier Roman and later Byzantine periods. Whilst Romanisation may have paved the way for Christianisation, most early Christian church buildings appear to express local identities rather than alle giance to Rome or Constantinople. The resultant variety was abol ished again after the collapse of pan-Mediterranean rule, when the Byzantine empire was reduced to little more than Asia Minor and the Iconoclast controversy resulted in a standardisation of Orthodox art. Çetinkaya H. Funeral spaces in Pantokratotr monastery Recent restorations on the Pantokrator monastic complex yiel ded enormous results unknown prior to the excavation-restoration activity. These include a substructure below the Northern church in the shape of the
church above; an annexed funeral chapel, half excavated, attached to the Southern church. Among other novelties on site observations indicate a probable burial ground for the clergy and imperial family members in the Southwestern part of the church complex. Vinogradov A. Athonite church or Arabian palace? Crossin-square triconch and the new architectural identity of the Empire The question of the origin of the triconch of “Athonite type” — an inscribed cross on 4 free-standing supports with additional apses from the south and north — still causes a heated debate in the scholarship.
Summary 291 The purpose of this article is to draw attention to monuments of this type outside the Balkans. It is very likely that the Triconch hall and the church of the Archangel Michael, built for the Emperor Theophilos by Ioannes Grammatikos and the architect Patrikios, had probably such a plan, possibly following an Arabic model, which, in turn, goes back to the Late Antique examples. The early churches of this type in Asia Minor (Islamköy and Sarıca Kilise), dating to the early 10th century, show its common and “prestigious” character, which led to its spread not only to the Balkans, but also to Russia. Kappas M. The architectural idiom of Thessaloniki during the Middle and Late Byzantine Periods: similarities and dif ferences from Constantinople In this essay the author attempt to focus on Thessaloniki’s most important standing monuments from the Middle and Late Byzantine periods, and, given that their similarities with Constantinople have al ready been highlighted enough, I shall stress where they depart from Constantinopolitan practices. Thessaloniki was indeed more influ enced by the architecture of the capital than any other city in Greece. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the structural and morphologi cal data reveals that as early as the Middle Byzantine period the city’s building workshops had managed to assimilate Constantinopolitan features and treat them in their own way, probably based on the local architectural tradition, which had its roots in the construction acti vity of the Transitional period. In subsequent centuries, and above all around
1300 the Thessalonian master builders skilfully merged mor phological elements from their rich local architectural heritage with practices and solutions originating mainly in Constantinople but also from other artistic centres, basically from the Despotate of Epirus or the Nicaea of the Laskarids. This creative osmosis gave the archi tecture of Thessaloniki its own peculiar identity, vividly captured in the dozens of monuments attributed to the activity of Thessalonian craftsmen. Zakharova A. Byzantine art of the 10th c.: Constantinople and Cappadocia The paper investigates some major tendencies in the 10th century Byzantine painting. The author analyzes some wall paintings in the
292 Summary cave churches of Cappadocia in comparison to the works of metropol itan art, such as illuminated manuscripts and fragments of mosaics. Two 10th century Cappadocian ensembles stand out as they show the strongest metropolitan influence: Kılıçlar church and especially the New Tokalı church in Göreme. The paper explores how the impulse given by these ensembles was further developed in local milieu in the first and in the second half of the 10th century respectively and to what extent the painting style in Cappadocia corresponded to the general lines of development in the art of Constantinople and Byzantium on the whole. Uyar T. B. Carving, Painting, and Inscribing Sacred Space in Late Byzantium: Bezirana Kilisesi Rediscovered (Peristrema-Cappadocia) The “Byzantine” paintings of Bezirana Kilisesi are not exceptional in late thirteenth-century Cappadocian artistic production under Is lamic rule, as they were executed by the same artist who also worked on another late thirteenth-century monument, Yüksekli Kilise 1. Fur thermore, the Bezirana/Yüksekli workshop is also linked to another group of closely interconnected murals in the second half of the thir teenth century. Although not as exceptional as the paintings of Be zirana/Yüksekli, these similar paintings aspire to reproduce late Byz antine fashions in regard to complex visual, textual, commemorative, and intercessory performances within the sacred space. A comprehen sive investigation across the late medieval painted programs in Cap padocia shows how the fashioning of sacred space involved forging close
links between the deceased and the living (both clerics and laypeople), as well as between decoration, commemoration, and the idea of protection, thus replicating the construction process of late Byzan tine cultural identity. A systematic inquiry into the sacred character of these church spaces thereby challenges commonly accepted notions of center and periphery in the cultural production and communal iden tity of Cappadocia in opposition to the rest of the Byzantine Empire at this period. Although the carved, painted, and inscribed environment of Bezirana Kilisesi is a product of the “post-Byzantine” social and cul tural context, the result represents one the of the finest and most opu lent late Byzantine sacred spaces.
Summary 293 Ivanov S. Anthony of Novgorod and His Byzantine Guide In this article, “Kniga Palomnik” is analyzed as an entwinement of two different formats: a standard narrative offered by a guide through Constantinople, and his answers to Anthony’s unexpected questions. The guide’s “voice” is clearly discernible thanks to the Graecisms pop ping up in the Old Russian text (they appear to be more numerous than Chr. Loparev, the publisher of the text, thought), but also due to numerous stereotyped “tour-guide gimmicks” that are accurately reproduced by the author. Yet, in some cases the pilgrim obviously in terrupts the guide by asking meaningful questions that the guide has to answer, thus breaking off his smooth flow of speech. A performa tive analysis helps clarify some unresolved problems posed by “Kniga palomnik”, including the topographical ones. Daskas B. ‘Veneţia hebbe principio per la destrution del la grande Trogia’. A note on the myth of Venice as alterum Byzantium The issue in this paper is the relationship between Byzantium and Venice as elaborated in the so-called ‘myth of Venice’, the repertoire of legends found in Venetian historiographical and rhetorical writings, which molds and fabricates the city’s past. Over the course of its histo ry, Venice developed strong and complex ties to Byzantium, drawing on the authority of the eastern imperial capital to legitimize its trade and economic ambitions across the Mediterranean. Even if the use of Byzantium as a reference point in Venetian cultural politics and artis tic production (e.g. the Basilica of San
Marco) has been evident across the centuries, within the shifting patterns of its legends of origin, its presence is apparently dissimulated, almost reduced to absence. It is during the thirteenth century that this attitude changes: having consolidated its role in the Levant as a result of the Fourth Crusade (1204), Venice proceeded to introduce into the creative reconstruction of its past new elements, overlaying its civic mythology with veiled ref erences to Byzantium. One of the traditional motifs of this mythology, about the city’s founding, is the Trojan legend. The illustrious model of the ancient city of Troy panders to Venice’s shifting political orien tations and propaganda, and aims at outlining, each time, paths that justify the prosperity of the city’s present and its providential history as opposed to its rivals (Padua, Rome, Constantinople). In the aftermath of the Fourth Crusade, the legend about the fire and sack of the
294 Summary ancient city of Troy and the ultimate flight of its inhabitants to the Lagoon, combined with an ingenious chronological reference for the city’s founding that hints at the moment when the Dogal sovereignty over part of the territories of the former Byzantine empire is official ly acknowledged in documents, shows a script of power politics that has Venice as heir of the βασιλεύουσα τοίν πόλεων, Constantinople. It is therefore as early as the thirteenth century that the concept of the Byzantine heritage of Venice — the myth of‘Venice as alterum Byzan tium’ as Cardinal Bessarion, later in the fifteenth century, put it — was laid down in its essential components, as a direct consequence of the impresa of 1204. Chernoglazov D. Letter writing manuals and model letter collections: epistolary theory in the Palaeologan period The aim of the present paper is to characterize the letter writing manuals and model letter collections, which were used by the Byzan tines during the Palaeologan period. The extant material is divided into three groups. The first group includes theoretical treatises going back to the late antique tradition. In these treatises, which were used primarily as school textbooks, letters are classified according to their purpose and content. The second group includes collections of authen tic letters, sometimes mixed with fictitious ones, where the material is distributed according to the same principles as in the treatises of the first group. The third group, much more extensive than the second, includes collections of letters and forms, which are
sorted according to the social status of the author and the addressee. Basically, these collections served as practical manuals for official correspondence. The second group is poorly represented in manuscripts. The first and the third, on the contrary, have an extensive manuscript tradition: the treatises of these groups were very common both in the capital and in provinces. Byzantine epistolary theory is conservative: different subgenres of letter writing manuals exist and develop independently, there are almost no texts at our disposal where different methods of letter classification are combined. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič 1976- Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič 1956- |
| author2 | Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič 1976- Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič 1956- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | a j v aj ajv s a i sa sai |
| author_GND | (DE-588)137962479 (DE-588)121910482 |
| author_corporate | Meždunarodnaja konferencija"Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii" Moskau |
| author_corporate_role | aut |
| author_facet | Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič 1976- Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič 1956- Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič 1976- Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič 1956- Meždunarodnaja konferencija"Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii" Moskau |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Meždunarodnaja konferencija"Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii" Moskau |
| author_variant | a j v aj ajv s a i sa sai |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047033029 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1224484100 (DE-599)BVBBV047033029 |
| format | Conference Proceeding Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03178nam a2200589 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047033029</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210129 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201127s2020 a||| |||| 10||| rus d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9785001650317</subfield><subfield code="9">978-5-00165-031-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1224484100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047033029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="111" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meždunarodnaja konferencija"Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii"</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="c">Moskau</subfield><subfield code="j">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1222290944</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">880-03</subfield><subfield code="a">Vizantij i Vizantija</subfield><subfield code="b">provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces</subfield><subfield code="c">pod redakciej A.Vinogradova i S. Ivanova</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Byzantion and Byzantium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">880-04</subfield><subfield code="a">Sankt-Peterburg</subfield><subfield code="b">Aletejja</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">301 Seiten, 44 ungezählte Seiten Tafeln</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Pläne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text russisch. Zusammenfassungen in englischer Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Kyrillische Schrift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hauptstadt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127960-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Regionalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049037-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Byzantinisches Reich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009256-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konstantinopel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073697-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="y">2017</subfield><subfield code="z">Moskau</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Byzantinisches Reich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009256-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Hauptstadt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127960-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Konstantinopel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073697-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Regionalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049037-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-01</subfield><subfield code="a">Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)137962479</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-02</subfield><subfield code="a">Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121910482</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">700-01/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Виноградов, Андрей Юрьевич</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">700-02/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Иванов, Сергей Аркадьевич</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">245-03/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Византий и Византия</subfield><subfield code="b">провинциализм столицы и столичность провинции</subfield><subfield code="c">под редакцией А.Виноградова и С. Иванова</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">264-04/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Санкт-Петербург</subfield><subfield code="b">Алетейя</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">sla</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20210129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032440260</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">709</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">900</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">398</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2017 Moskau gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift 2017 Moskau |
| geographic | Byzantinisches Reich (DE-588)4009256-2 gnd Konstantinopel (DE-588)4073697-0 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Byzantinisches Reich Konstantinopel |
| id | DE-604.BV047033029 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T16:02:53Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:41Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)1222290944 |
| isbn | 9785001650317 |
| language | Russian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032440260 |
| oclc_num | 1224484100 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 301 Seiten, 44 ungezählte Seiten Tafeln Illustrationen, Pläne |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20210129 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Aletejja |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Meždunarodnaja konferencija"Vizantij i Vizantija: provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii" 2017 Moskau Verfasser (DE-588)1222290944 aut 880-03 Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces pod redakciej A.Vinogradova i S. Ivanova Byzantion and Byzantium 880-04 Sankt-Peterburg Aletejja 2020 301 Seiten, 44 ungezählte Seiten Tafeln Illustrationen, Pläne txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Text russisch. Zusammenfassungen in englischer Sprache Kyrillische Schrift Hauptstadt (DE-588)4127960-8 gnd rswk-swf Regionalismus (DE-588)4049037-3 gnd rswk-swf Byzantinisches Reich (DE-588)4009256-2 gnd rswk-swf Konstantinopel (DE-588)4073697-0 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2017 Moskau gnd-content Byzantinisches Reich (DE-588)4009256-2 g Hauptstadt (DE-588)4127960-8 s Konstantinopel (DE-588)4073697-0 g Regionalismus (DE-588)4049037-3 s DE-604 880-01 Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič 1976- (DE-588)137962479 aut edt 880-02 Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič 1956- (DE-588)121910482 aut edt Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract 700-01/(N Виноградов, Андрей Юрьевич edt 700-02/(N Иванов, Сергей Аркадьевич edt 245-03/(N Византий и Византия провинциализм столицы и столичность провинции под редакцией А.Виноградова и С. Иванова 264-04/(N Санкт-Петербург Алетейя 2020 |
| spellingShingle | Vinogradov, Andrej Jurʹevič 1976- Ivanov, Sergej Arkadʹevič 1956- Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces Hauptstadt (DE-588)4127960-8 gnd Regionalismus (DE-588)4049037-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4127960-8 (DE-588)4049037-3 (DE-588)4009256-2 (DE-588)4073697-0 (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |
| title_alt | Byzantion and Byzantium |
| title_auth | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |
| title_exact_search | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |
| title_full | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces pod redakciej A.Vinogradova i S. Ivanova |
| title_fullStr | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces pod redakciej A.Vinogradova i S. Ivanova |
| title_full_unstemmed | Vizantij i Vizantija provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces pod redakciej A.Vinogradova i S. Ivanova |
| title_short | Vizantij i Vizantija |
| title_sort | vizantij i vizantija provincializm stolicy i stolicnostʹ provincii byzantion and byzantium the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |
| title_sub | provincializm stolicy i stoličnostʹ provincii = Byzantion and Byzantium : the provincialism of the center and the centrality of the provinces |
| topic | Hauptstadt (DE-588)4127960-8 gnd Regionalismus (DE-588)4049037-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Hauptstadt Regionalismus Byzantinisches Reich Konstantinopel Konferenzschrift 2017 Moskau |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032440260&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mezdunarodnajakonferencijavizantijivizantijaprovincializmstolicyistolicnostʹprovinciimoskau vizantijivizantijaprovincializmstolicyistolicnostʹprovinciibyzantionandbyzantiumtheprovincialismofthecenterandthecentralityoftheprovinces AT vinogradovandrejjurʹevic vizantijivizantijaprovincializmstolicyistolicnostʹprovinciibyzantionandbyzantiumtheprovincialismofthecenterandthecentralityoftheprovinces AT ivanovsergejarkadʹevic vizantijivizantijaprovincializmstolicyistolicnostʹprovinciibyzantionandbyzantiumtheprovincialismofthecenterandthecentralityoftheprovinces AT mezdunarodnajakonferencijavizantijivizantijaprovincializmstolicyistolicnostʹprovinciimoskau byzantionandbyzantium AT vinogradovandrejjurʹevic byzantionandbyzantium AT ivanovsergejarkadʹevic byzantionandbyzantium |