Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution: the Supreme Court's challenge
"The United States is extremely diverse religiously and, not infrequently, individuals sincerely contend that they are unable to act in accord with law as a matter of conscience. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion and the United States S...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
London
Routledge
2018
|
Schriftenreihe: | ICLARS series on law and religion
ICLARS series on law and religion |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "The United States is extremely diverse religiously and, not infrequently, individuals sincerely contend that they are unable to act in accord with law as a matter of conscience. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion and the United States Supreme Court has issued many decisions exploring the depth and breadth of those protections. This book addresses the Court's free exercise jurisprudence, discussing what counts as religion and the protections that have been afforded to a variety of religious practices. Regrettably, the Court has not offered a principled and consistent account of which religious practices are protected or even how to decide whether a particular practice is protected, which has resulted in similar cases being treated dissimilarly. Further, the Court's free exercise jurisprudence has been used to provide guidance in interpreting federal statutory protections, which is making matters even more chaotic. This book attempts to clarify what the Court has said in the hopes that it will contribute to the development of a more consistent and principled jurisprudence that respects the rights of the religious and the non-religious." -- Publisher's website |
Beschreibung: | Description based on print version record |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (viii, 157 pages.) |
ISBN: | 9781351258562 1351258567 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047016173 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201118s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781351258562 |c electronic bk. |9 978-1-351-25856-2 | ||
020 | |a 1351258567 |c electronic bk. |9 1-351-25856-7 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-7-TFC)9781351258562 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047016173 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
082 | 0 | |a 342.7308/52 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Strasser, Mark Philip |d 1955- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution |b the Supreme Court's challenge |c Mark P. Strasser |
264 | 1 | |a London |b Routledge |c 2018 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (viii, 157 pages.) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a ICLARS series on law and religion | |
490 | 0 | |a ICLARS series on law and religion | |
500 | |a Description based on print version record | ||
520 | |a "The United States is extremely diverse religiously and, not infrequently, individuals sincerely contend that they are unable to act in accord with law as a matter of conscience. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion and the United States Supreme Court has issued many decisions exploring the depth and breadth of those protections. This book addresses the Court's free exercise jurisprudence, discussing what counts as religion and the protections that have been afforded to a variety of religious practices. Regrettably, the Court has not offered a principled and consistent account of which religious practices are protected or even how to decide whether a particular practice is protected, which has resulted in similar cases being treated dissimilarly. Further, the Court's free exercise jurisprudence has been used to provide guidance in interpreting federal statutory protections, which is making matters even more chaotic. This book attempts to clarify what the Court has said in the hopes that it will contribute to the development of a more consistent and principled jurisprudence that respects the rights of the religious and the non-religious." -- Publisher's website | ||
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States / Supreme Court |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of religion / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Church and state / United States | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351258562 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveroeffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-7-TFC | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423710 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804181977103859712 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Strasser, Mark Philip 1955- |
author_facet | Strasser, Mark Philip 1955- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Strasser, Mark Philip 1955- |
author_variant | m p s mp mps |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047016173 |
collection | ZDB-7-TFC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-7-TFC)9781351258562 (DE-599)BVBBV047016173 |
dewey-full | 342.7308/52 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.7308/52 |
dewey-search | 342.7308/52 |
dewey-sort | 3342.7308 252 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02587nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047016173</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201118s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781351258562</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-351-25856-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1351258567</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">1-351-25856-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-7-TFC)9781351258562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047016173</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/52</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strasser, Mark Philip</subfield><subfield code="d">1955-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution</subfield><subfield code="b">the Supreme Court's challenge</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark P. Strasser</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (viii, 157 pages.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ICLARS series on law and religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ICLARS series on law and religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The United States is extremely diverse religiously and, not infrequently, individuals sincerely contend that they are unable to act in accord with law as a matter of conscience. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion and the United States Supreme Court has issued many decisions exploring the depth and breadth of those protections. This book addresses the Court's free exercise jurisprudence, discussing what counts as religion and the protections that have been afforded to a variety of religious practices. Regrettably, the Court has not offered a principled and consistent account of which religious practices are protected or even how to decide whether a particular practice is protected, which has resulted in similar cases being treated dissimilarly. Further, the Court's free exercise jurisprudence has been used to provide guidance in interpreting federal statutory protections, which is making matters even more chaotic. This book attempts to clarify what the Court has said in the hopes that it will contribute to the development of a more consistent and principled jurisprudence that respects the rights of the religious and the non-religious." -- Publisher's website</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of religion / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Church and state / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351258562</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveroeffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-7-TFC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423710</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047016173 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T15:58:17Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:13Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781351258562 1351258567 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423710 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 1 online resource (viii, 157 pages.) |
psigel | ZDB-7-TFC |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSearch | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series2 | ICLARS series on law and religion |
spelling | Strasser, Mark Philip 1955- Verfasser aut Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge Mark P. Strasser London Routledge 2018 1 online resource (viii, 157 pages.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier ICLARS series on law and religion Description based on print version record "The United States is extremely diverse religiously and, not infrequently, individuals sincerely contend that they are unable to act in accord with law as a matter of conscience. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion and the United States Supreme Court has issued many decisions exploring the depth and breadth of those protections. This book addresses the Court's free exercise jurisprudence, discussing what counts as religion and the protections that have been afforded to a variety of religious practices. Regrettably, the Court has not offered a principled and consistent account of which religious practices are protected or even how to decide whether a particular practice is protected, which has resulted in similar cases being treated dissimilarly. Further, the Court's free exercise jurisprudence has been used to provide guidance in interpreting federal statutory protections, which is making matters even more chaotic. This book attempts to clarify what the Court has said in the hopes that it will contribute to the development of a more consistent and principled jurisprudence that respects the rights of the religious and the non-religious." -- Publisher's website United States / Supreme Court Freedom of religion / United States Church and state / United States https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351258562 Verlag URL des Erstveroeffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Strasser, Mark Philip 1955- Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge United States / Supreme Court Freedom of religion / United States Church and state / United States |
title | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge |
title_auth | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge |
title_exact_search | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge |
title_exact_search_txtP | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge |
title_full | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge Mark P. Strasser |
title_fullStr | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge Mark P. Strasser |
title_full_unstemmed | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution the Supreme Court's challenge Mark P. Strasser |
title_short | Free exercise of religion and the United States Constitution |
title_sort | free exercise of religion and the united states constitution the supreme court s challenge |
title_sub | the Supreme Court's challenge |
topic | United States / Supreme Court Freedom of religion / United States Church and state / United States |
topic_facet | United States / Supreme Court Freedom of religion / United States Church and state / United States |
url | https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351258562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strassermarkphilip freeexerciseofreligionandtheunitedstatesconstitutionthesupremecourtschallenge |