The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic:
"This book sets out for the first time in English and in the terms of modern logic the semantics of the Port Royal Logic (La Logique ou l'Art de penser, 1662-1685) of Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, perhaps the most influential logic book in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its goal is to e...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
Routledge
2020
|
Schriftenreihe: | Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy
Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "This book sets out for the first time in English and in the terms of modern logic the semantics of the Port Royal Logic (La Logique ou l'Art de penser, 1662-1685) of Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, perhaps the most influential logic book in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its goal is to explain how the Logic reworks the foundation of pre-Cartesian logic so as to make it compatible with Descartes' metaphysics. The Logic's authors forged a new theory of reference based on the medieval notion of objective being, which is essentially the modern notion of intentional content. Indeed, the book's central aim is to detail how the Logic reoriented semantics so that it centered on the notion of intentional content. This content, which the Logic calls comprehension, consists of an idea's defining modes. Mechanisms are defined in terms of comprehension that rework earlier explanations of central notions like conceptual inclusion, signification, abstraction, idea restriction, sensation, and most importantly within the Logic's metatheory, the concept of idea-extension, which is a new technical concept coined by the Logic. Although Descartes is famous for rejecting "Aristotelianism," he says virtually nothing about logic. His followers fill the gap. By putting to use the doctrine of objective being, which had been a relatively minor part of medieval logic, they preserve more central semantic doctrines, especially a correspondence theory of truth. A recurring theme of the book is the degree to which the Logic hews to medieval theory. This interpretation is at odds with what has become a standard reading among French scholars according to which this 16th-century work should be understood as rejecting earlier logic along with Aristotelian metaphysics, and as putting in its place structures more like those of 19th-century class theory"-- |
Beschreibung: | Description based on print version record |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (241 pages.) |
ISBN: | 9781351249195 1351249193 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047016076 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201118s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781351249195 |c electronic bk. |9 978-1-351-24919-5 | ||
020 | |a 1351249193 |c electronic bk. |9 1-351-24919-3 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-7-TFC)9781351249195 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047016076 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
082 | 0 | |a 160 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Martin, John N. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic |c John N. Martin |
264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b Routledge |c 2020 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (241 pages.) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy | |
490 | 0 | |a Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy | |
500 | |a Description based on print version record | ||
520 | |a "This book sets out for the first time in English and in the terms of modern logic the semantics of the Port Royal Logic (La Logique ou l'Art de penser, 1662-1685) of Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, perhaps the most influential logic book in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its goal is to explain how the Logic reworks the foundation of pre-Cartesian logic so as to make it compatible with Descartes' metaphysics. The Logic's authors forged a new theory of reference based on the medieval notion of objective being, which is essentially the modern notion of intentional content. Indeed, the book's central aim is to detail how the Logic reoriented semantics so that it centered on the notion of intentional content. This content, which the Logic calls comprehension, consists of an idea's defining modes. Mechanisms are defined in terms of comprehension that rework earlier explanations of central notions like conceptual inclusion, signification, abstraction, idea restriction, sensation, and most importantly within the Logic's metatheory, the concept of idea-extension, which is a new technical concept coined by the Logic. Although Descartes is famous for rejecting "Aristotelianism," he says virtually nothing about logic. His followers fill the gap. By putting to use the doctrine of objective being, which had been a relatively minor part of medieval logic, they preserve more central semantic doctrines, especially a correspondence theory of truth. A recurring theme of the book is the degree to which the Logic hews to medieval theory. This interpretation is at odds with what has become a standard reading among French scholars according to which this 16th-century work should be understood as rejecting earlier logic along with Aristotelian metaphysics, and as putting in its place structures more like those of 19th-century class theory"-- | ||
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Arnauld, Antoine / 1612-1694 / Logique |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Nicole, Pierre / 1625-1695 |
650 | 4 | |a Logic / Early works to 1800 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351249195 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveroeffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-7-TFC | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423612 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804181976926650368 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Martin, John N. |
author_facet | Martin, John N. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Martin, John N. |
author_variant | j n m jn jnm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047016076 |
collection | ZDB-7-TFC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-7-TFC)9781351249195 (DE-599)BVBBV047016076 |
dewey-full | 160 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 160 - Philosophical logic |
dewey-raw | 160 |
dewey-search | 160 |
dewey-sort | 3160 |
dewey-tens | 160 - Philosophical logic |
discipline | Philosophie |
discipline_str_mv | Philosophie |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03172nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047016076</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201118s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781351249195</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-351-24919-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1351249193</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">1-351-24919-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-7-TFC)9781351249195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047016076</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">160</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin, John N.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic</subfield><subfield code="c">John N. Martin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (241 pages.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book sets out for the first time in English and in the terms of modern logic the semantics of the Port Royal Logic (La Logique ou l'Art de penser, 1662-1685) of Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, perhaps the most influential logic book in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its goal is to explain how the Logic reworks the foundation of pre-Cartesian logic so as to make it compatible with Descartes' metaphysics. The Logic's authors forged a new theory of reference based on the medieval notion of objective being, which is essentially the modern notion of intentional content. Indeed, the book's central aim is to detail how the Logic reoriented semantics so that it centered on the notion of intentional content. This content, which the Logic calls comprehension, consists of an idea's defining modes. Mechanisms are defined in terms of comprehension that rework earlier explanations of central notions like conceptual inclusion, signification, abstraction, idea restriction, sensation, and most importantly within the Logic's metatheory, the concept of idea-extension, which is a new technical concept coined by the Logic. Although Descartes is famous for rejecting "Aristotelianism," he says virtually nothing about logic. His followers fill the gap. By putting to use the doctrine of objective being, which had been a relatively minor part of medieval logic, they preserve more central semantic doctrines, especially a correspondence theory of truth. A recurring theme of the book is the degree to which the Logic hews to medieval theory. This interpretation is at odds with what has become a standard reading among French scholars according to which this 16th-century work should be understood as rejecting earlier logic along with Aristotelian metaphysics, and as putting in its place structures more like those of 19th-century class theory"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arnauld, Antoine / 1612-1694 / Logique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nicole, Pierre / 1625-1695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logic / Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351249195</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveroeffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-7-TFC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423612</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047016076 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T15:58:17Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:13Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781351249195 1351249193 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423612 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 1 online resource (241 pages.) |
psigel | ZDB-7-TFC |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy |
spelling | Martin, John N. Verfasser aut The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic John N. Martin New York, NY Routledge 2020 1 online resource (241 pages.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Routledge studies in seventeenth-century philosophy Description based on print version record "This book sets out for the first time in English and in the terms of modern logic the semantics of the Port Royal Logic (La Logique ou l'Art de penser, 1662-1685) of Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, perhaps the most influential logic book in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its goal is to explain how the Logic reworks the foundation of pre-Cartesian logic so as to make it compatible with Descartes' metaphysics. The Logic's authors forged a new theory of reference based on the medieval notion of objective being, which is essentially the modern notion of intentional content. Indeed, the book's central aim is to detail how the Logic reoriented semantics so that it centered on the notion of intentional content. This content, which the Logic calls comprehension, consists of an idea's defining modes. Mechanisms are defined in terms of comprehension that rework earlier explanations of central notions like conceptual inclusion, signification, abstraction, idea restriction, sensation, and most importantly within the Logic's metatheory, the concept of idea-extension, which is a new technical concept coined by the Logic. Although Descartes is famous for rejecting "Aristotelianism," he says virtually nothing about logic. His followers fill the gap. By putting to use the doctrine of objective being, which had been a relatively minor part of medieval logic, they preserve more central semantic doctrines, especially a correspondence theory of truth. A recurring theme of the book is the degree to which the Logic hews to medieval theory. This interpretation is at odds with what has become a standard reading among French scholars according to which this 16th-century work should be understood as rejecting earlier logic along with Aristotelian metaphysics, and as putting in its place structures more like those of 19th-century class theory"-- Arnauld, Antoine / 1612-1694 / Logique Nicole, Pierre / 1625-1695 Logic / Early works to 1800 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351249195 Verlag URL des Erstveroeffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Martin, John N. The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic Arnauld, Antoine / 1612-1694 / Logique Nicole, Pierre / 1625-1695 Logic / Early works to 1800 |
title | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic |
title_auth | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic |
title_exact_search | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic |
title_exact_search_txtP | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic |
title_full | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic John N. Martin |
title_fullStr | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic John N. Martin |
title_full_unstemmed | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic John N. Martin |
title_short | The Cartesian semantics of the Port Royal Logic |
title_sort | the cartesian semantics of the port royal logic |
topic | Arnauld, Antoine / 1612-1694 / Logique Nicole, Pierre / 1625-1695 Logic / Early works to 1800 |
topic_facet | Arnauld, Antoine / 1612-1694 / Logique Nicole, Pierre / 1625-1695 Logic / Early works to 1800 |
url | https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351249195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinjohnn thecartesiansemanticsoftheportroyallogic |