The judicialization of politics in Pakistan: a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan
"Since 2007, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a dominant force in Pakistani politics through its hyper-active use of judicial review, or the power to overrule Parliament's laws and the prime minister's acts. This hyper-activism was on display during the Supreme Court'...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Abingdon, Oxon
Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Routledge contemporary South Asia series
Routledge contemporary South Asia series 123 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Since 2007, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a dominant force in Pakistani politics through its hyper-active use of judicial review, or the power to overrule Parliament's laws and the prime minister's acts. This hyper-activism was on display during the Supreme Court's unilateral disqualification of Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani in 2012 under the leadership of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. Despite the Supreme Court's practical adoption of restraint subsequent to the retirement of Chief Justice Chaudhry in 2013, the Court has once again disqualified a prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, due to allegations of corruption in 2017. While many critics have focused on the substance of the court's decisions in these cases, sufficient focus is not paid to the amorphous case-selection process of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. In order to compare the relatively unregulated process of case-selection in Pakistan to the more structured processes utilized by the Supreme Courts of the United States' and India, this book aims to understand the historical roots of judicial review in each country dating back to the colonial era extending through the foundational period of each nation impacting present-day jurisprudence. As a first in its kind, this study comparatively examines these periods of history in order to contextualize a practical prescription to standardize the case-selection process in the Supreme Court of Pakistan in a way that retains the Court's overall power while limiting its involvement in purely political issues. This publication offers a critical and comparative view of the Supreme Court of Pakistan's recent involvement in political disputes due to the lack of a discerning case-selection system that has otherwise been adopted by the Supreme Courts of India and the United States' to varying degrees."-- |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on print version record |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (x, 189 pages.) |
| ISBN: | 9781351190107 1351190105 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047015665 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201118s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781351190107 |c electronic bk. |9 978-1-351-19010-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 1351190105 |c electronic bk. |9 1-351-19010-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-7-TFC)9781351190107 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047015665 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.5491/05 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Husain, Waris |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The judicialization of politics in Pakistan |b a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan |c Waris Husain |
| 264 | 1 | |a Abingdon, Oxon |b Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 189 pages.) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Routledge contemporary South Asia series | |
| 490 | 0 | |a Routledge contemporary South Asia series |v 123 | |
| 500 | |a Description based on print version record | ||
| 520 | |a "Since 2007, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a dominant force in Pakistani politics through its hyper-active use of judicial review, or the power to overrule Parliament's laws and the prime minister's acts. This hyper-activism was on display during the Supreme Court's unilateral disqualification of Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani in 2012 under the leadership of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. Despite the Supreme Court's practical adoption of restraint subsequent to the retirement of Chief Justice Chaudhry in 2013, the Court has once again disqualified a prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, due to allegations of corruption in 2017. While many critics have focused on the substance of the court's decisions in these cases, sufficient focus is not paid to the amorphous case-selection process of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. In order to compare the relatively unregulated process of case-selection in Pakistan to the more structured processes utilized by the Supreme Courts of the United States' and India, this book aims to understand the historical roots of judicial review in each country dating back to the colonial era extending through the foundational period of each nation impacting present-day jurisprudence. As a first in its kind, this study comparatively examines these periods of history in order to contextualize a practical prescription to standardize the case-selection process in the Supreme Court of Pakistan in a way that retains the Court's overall power while limiting its involvement in purely political issues. This publication offers a critical and comparative view of the Supreme Court of Pakistan's recent involvement in political disputes due to the lack of a discerning case-selection system that has otherwise been adopted by the Supreme Courts of India and the United States' to varying degrees."-- | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power / Pakistan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power / India | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process / Pakistan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process / India | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law / Political aspects | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351190114 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveroeffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-7-TFC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423202 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181976069963776 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Husain, Waris |
| author_facet | Husain, Waris |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Husain, Waris |
| author_variant | w h wh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047015665 |
| collection | ZDB-7-TFC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-7-TFC)9781351190107 (DE-599)BVBBV047015665 |
| dewey-full | 347.5491/05 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.5491/05 |
| dewey-search | 347.5491/05 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.5491 15 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03520nmm a2200421zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047015665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201118s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781351190107</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-351-19010-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1351190105</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">1-351-19010-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-7-TFC)9781351190107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047015665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.5491/05</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Husain, Waris</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The judicialization of politics in Pakistan</subfield><subfield code="b">a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan</subfield><subfield code="c">Waris Husain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Abingdon, Oxon</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (x, 189 pages.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge contemporary South Asia series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge contemporary South Asia series</subfield><subfield code="v">123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Since 2007, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a dominant force in Pakistani politics through its hyper-active use of judicial review, or the power to overrule Parliament's laws and the prime minister's acts. This hyper-activism was on display during the Supreme Court's unilateral disqualification of Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani in 2012 under the leadership of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. Despite the Supreme Court's practical adoption of restraint subsequent to the retirement of Chief Justice Chaudhry in 2013, the Court has once again disqualified a prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, due to allegations of corruption in 2017. While many critics have focused on the substance of the court's decisions in these cases, sufficient focus is not paid to the amorphous case-selection process of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. In order to compare the relatively unregulated process of case-selection in Pakistan to the more structured processes utilized by the Supreme Courts of the United States' and India, this book aims to understand the historical roots of judicial review in each country dating back to the colonial era extending through the foundational period of each nation impacting present-day jurisprudence. As a first in its kind, this study comparatively examines these periods of history in order to contextualize a practical prescription to standardize the case-selection process in the Supreme Court of Pakistan in a way that retains the Court's overall power while limiting its involvement in purely political issues. This publication offers a critical and comparative view of the Supreme Court of Pakistan's recent involvement in political disputes due to the lack of a discerning case-selection system that has otherwise been adopted by the Supreme Courts of India and the United States' to varying degrees."--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power / Pakistan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power / India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / Pakistan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law / Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351190114</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveroeffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-7-TFC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423202</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047015665 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:58:16Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:12Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781351190107 1351190105 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032423202 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource (x, 189 pages.) |
| psigel | ZDB-7-TFC |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Routledge contemporary South Asia series |
| spelling | Husain, Waris Verfasser aut The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan Waris Husain Abingdon, Oxon Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group 2018 1 online resource (x, 189 pages.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Routledge contemporary South Asia series Routledge contemporary South Asia series 123 Description based on print version record "Since 2007, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a dominant force in Pakistani politics through its hyper-active use of judicial review, or the power to overrule Parliament's laws and the prime minister's acts. This hyper-activism was on display during the Supreme Court's unilateral disqualification of Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani in 2012 under the leadership of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. Despite the Supreme Court's practical adoption of restraint subsequent to the retirement of Chief Justice Chaudhry in 2013, the Court has once again disqualified a prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, due to allegations of corruption in 2017. While many critics have focused on the substance of the court's decisions in these cases, sufficient focus is not paid to the amorphous case-selection process of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. In order to compare the relatively unregulated process of case-selection in Pakistan to the more structured processes utilized by the Supreme Courts of the United States' and India, this book aims to understand the historical roots of judicial review in each country dating back to the colonial era extending through the foundational period of each nation impacting present-day jurisprudence. As a first in its kind, this study comparatively examines these periods of history in order to contextualize a practical prescription to standardize the case-selection process in the Supreme Court of Pakistan in a way that retains the Court's overall power while limiting its involvement in purely political issues. This publication offers a critical and comparative view of the Supreme Court of Pakistan's recent involvement in political disputes due to the lack of a discerning case-selection system that has otherwise been adopted by the Supreme Courts of India and the United States' to varying degrees."-- Political questions and judicial power / Pakistan Political questions and judicial power / India Political questions and judicial power / United States Judicial process / Pakistan Judicial process / India Judicial process / United States Law / Political aspects https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351190114 Verlag URL des Erstveroeffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Husain, Waris The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan Political questions and judicial power / Pakistan Political questions and judicial power / India Political questions and judicial power / United States Judicial process / Pakistan Judicial process / India Judicial process / United States Law / Political aspects |
| title | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan |
| title_auth | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan |
| title_exact_search | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan |
| title_full | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan Waris Husain |
| title_fullStr | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan Waris Husain |
| title_full_unstemmed | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan Waris Husain |
| title_short | The judicialization of politics in Pakistan |
| title_sort | the judicialization of politics in pakistan a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in india the us and pakistan |
| title_sub | a comparative study of judicial restraint and its development in India, the US and Pakistan |
| topic | Political questions and judicial power / Pakistan Political questions and judicial power / India Political questions and judicial power / United States Judicial process / Pakistan Judicial process / India Judicial process / United States Law / Political aspects |
| topic_facet | Political questions and judicial power / Pakistan Political questions and judicial power / India Political questions and judicial power / United States Judicial process / Pakistan Judicial process / India Judicial process / United States Law / Political aspects |
| url | https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351190114 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT husainwaris thejudicializationofpoliticsinpakistanacomparativestudyofjudicialrestraintanditsdevelopmentinindiatheusandpakistan |