The judicial tug of war: how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary
"On February 13, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia, the conservative intellectual anchor on the US Supreme Court, died unexpectedly while on a hunting trip in Texas. Attention immediately turned to President Barack Obama and how he would respond to a vacancy on the nation's highest court. Altho...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Political economy of institutions and decisions
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "On February 13, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia, the conservative intellectual anchor on the US Supreme Court, died unexpectedly while on a hunting trip in Texas. Attention immediately turned to President Barack Obama and how he would respond to a vacancy on the nation's highest court. Although Scalia was not a pivotal member of the Court by any means, his absence left behind a 4-4 balance in terms of justices appointed by Democratic presidents and those appointed by Republican ones. Obama's appointment of a liberal-leaning successor would immediately shift the balance of power on the Court toward a 5-4 liberal majority, possibly for decades"-- |
| Beschreibung: | xvi, 314 Seiten Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9781108841368 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046981890 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210118 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 201104s2021 |||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108841368 |9 978-1-108-84136-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1220901376 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046981890 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.732 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Bonica, Adam |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1225320968 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The judicial tug of war |b how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary |c Adam Bonica, Stanford University, California, Maya Sen, Harvard University, Massachusetts |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a xvi, 314 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Political economy of institutions and decisions | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Introduction: The tug of war over the American judiciary -- The "American Aristocracy" -- The Bar, self-regulation, and judicial capture -- Politicians, their interests, and the judicial tug of war -- Political incentives and politicization in the Federal Courts -- Politicization in the States and across judicial selection mechanisms -- The politics of judicial reform -- The tug of war, polarization, and judicial conflict -- The relationship between the tug of war and polarization -- Conclusion: American courts in times of increasing polarization | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "On February 13, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia, the conservative intellectual anchor on the US Supreme Court, died unexpectedly while on a hunting trip in Texas. Attention immediately turned to President Barack Obama and how he would respond to a vacancy on the nation's highest court. Although Scalia was not a pivotal member of the Court by any means, his absence left behind a 4-4 balance in terms of justices appointed by Democratic presidents and those appointed by Republican ones. Obama's appointment of a liberal-leaning successor would immediately shift the balance of power on the Court toward a 5-4 liberal majority, possibly for decades"-- | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Judicial process / Political aspects / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Judges / Selection and appointment / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Justice, Administration of / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Judges / Selection and appointment | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Judicial process / Political aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Justice, Administration of | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sen, Maya |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1161814523 |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |a Bonica, Adam, 1983- |t The judicial tug of war |d New York : Cambridge University Press, 2021 |z 978-1-108-89400-5 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032389951 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181916805496832 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Bonica, Adam Sen, Maya |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1225320968 (DE-588)1161814523 |
| author_facet | Bonica, Adam Sen, Maya |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Bonica, Adam |
| author_variant | a b ab m s ms |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046981890 |
| contents | Introduction: The tug of war over the American judiciary -- The "American Aristocracy" -- The Bar, self-regulation, and judicial capture -- Politicians, their interests, and the judicial tug of war -- Political incentives and politicization in the Federal Courts -- Politicization in the States and across judicial selection mechanisms -- The politics of judicial reform -- The tug of war, polarization, and judicial conflict -- The relationship between the tug of war and polarization -- Conclusion: American courts in times of increasing polarization |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1220901376 (DE-599)BVBBV046981890 |
| dewey-full | 347.732 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.732 |
| dewey-search | 347.732 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.732 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02938nam a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046981890</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210118 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201104s2021 |||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108841368</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-84136-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1220901376</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046981890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.732</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bonica, Adam</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1225320968</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The judicial tug of war</subfield><subfield code="b">how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary</subfield><subfield code="c">Adam Bonica, Stanford University, California, Maya Sen, Harvard University, Massachusetts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xvi, 314 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Political economy of institutions and decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: The tug of war over the American judiciary -- The "American Aristocracy" -- The Bar, self-regulation, and judicial capture -- Politicians, their interests, and the judicial tug of war -- Political incentives and politicization in the Federal Courts -- Politicization in the States and across judicial selection mechanisms -- The politics of judicial reform -- The tug of war, polarization, and judicial conflict -- The relationship between the tug of war and polarization -- Conclusion: American courts in times of increasing polarization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"On February 13, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia, the conservative intellectual anchor on the US Supreme Court, died unexpectedly while on a hunting trip in Texas. Attention immediately turned to President Barack Obama and how he would respond to a vacancy on the nation's highest court. Although Scalia was not a pivotal member of the Court by any means, his absence left behind a 4-4 balance in terms of justices appointed by Democratic presidents and those appointed by Republican ones. Obama's appointment of a liberal-leaning successor would immediately shift the balance of power on the Court toward a 5-4 liberal majority, possibly for decades"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / Political aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judges / Selection and appointment / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Justice, Administration of / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judges / Selection and appointment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Justice, Administration of</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sen, Maya</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1161814523</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Bonica, Adam, 1983-</subfield><subfield code="t">The judicial tug of war</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Cambridge University Press, 2021</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-89400-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032389951</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046981890 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:49:49Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:59:16Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108841368 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032389951 |
| oclc_num | 1220901376 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 |
| physical | xvi, 314 Seiten Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Political economy of institutions and decisions |
| spelling | Bonica, Adam Verfasser (DE-588)1225320968 aut The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary Adam Bonica, Stanford University, California, Maya Sen, Harvard University, Massachusetts Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2021 xvi, 314 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Political economy of institutions and decisions Introduction: The tug of war over the American judiciary -- The "American Aristocracy" -- The Bar, self-regulation, and judicial capture -- Politicians, their interests, and the judicial tug of war -- Political incentives and politicization in the Federal Courts -- Politicization in the States and across judicial selection mechanisms -- The politics of judicial reform -- The tug of war, polarization, and judicial conflict -- The relationship between the tug of war and polarization -- Conclusion: American courts in times of increasing polarization "On February 13, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia, the conservative intellectual anchor on the US Supreme Court, died unexpectedly while on a hunting trip in Texas. Attention immediately turned to President Barack Obama and how he would respond to a vacancy on the nation's highest court. Although Scalia was not a pivotal member of the Court by any means, his absence left behind a 4-4 balance in terms of justices appointed by Democratic presidents and those appointed by Republican ones. Obama's appointment of a liberal-leaning successor would immediately shift the balance of power on the Court toward a 5-4 liberal majority, possibly for decades"-- Political questions and judicial power / United States Judicial process / Political aspects / United States Judges / Selection and appointment / United States Justice, Administration of / United States Judges / Selection and appointment Judicial process / Political aspects Justice, Administration of Political questions and judicial power United States Sen, Maya Verfasser (DE-588)1161814523 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Bonica, Adam, 1983- The judicial tug of war New York : Cambridge University Press, 2021 978-1-108-89400-5 |
| spellingShingle | Bonica, Adam Sen, Maya The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary Introduction: The tug of war over the American judiciary -- The "American Aristocracy" -- The Bar, self-regulation, and judicial capture -- Politicians, their interests, and the judicial tug of war -- Political incentives and politicization in the Federal Courts -- Politicization in the States and across judicial selection mechanisms -- The politics of judicial reform -- The tug of war, polarization, and judicial conflict -- The relationship between the tug of war and polarization -- Conclusion: American courts in times of increasing polarization |
| title | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary |
| title_auth | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary |
| title_exact_search | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary |
| title_full | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary Adam Bonica, Stanford University, California, Maya Sen, Harvard University, Massachusetts |
| title_fullStr | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary Adam Bonica, Stanford University, California, Maya Sen, Harvard University, Massachusetts |
| title_full_unstemmed | The judicial tug of war how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary Adam Bonica, Stanford University, California, Maya Sen, Harvard University, Massachusetts |
| title_short | The judicial tug of war |
| title_sort | the judicial tug of war how lawyers politicians and ideological incentives shape the american judiciary |
| title_sub | how lawyers, politicians, and ideological incentives shape the American judiciary |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bonicaadam thejudicialtugofwarhowlawyerspoliticiansandideologicalincentivesshapetheamericanjudiciary AT senmaya thejudicialtugofwarhowlawyerspoliticiansandideologicalincentivesshapetheamericanjudiciary |