Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation:
Risk-based capital standards presume a need for common capital standards across countries. The details of forging an agreement were left to the staffs of the primary bank regulators in each country, and compromises were inevitable. Although domestic constituencies' reactions to the proposals we...
Gespeichert in:
Weitere Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Boston, MA
Springer US
1991
|
Schriftenreihe: | Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BTU01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Risk-based capital standards presume a need for common capital standards across countries. The details of forging an agreement were left to the staffs of the primary bank regulators in each country, and compromises were inevitable. Although domestic constituencies' reactions to the proposals were invited, the arduous negotiations that led to the proposals generated intense pressure on the principals not to make changes. The European Community's approach to financial integration seems to be driven by a political desire to achieve an integrated market within Europe, despite significant institutional differences among countries. Underlying that desire is a belief that the market pressures that result from different regulatory systems operating in the same market will produce the right answer. The financial provisions of the U.S.-Canada free-trade agreement take a direction that, in my judgment, is more productive. The provisions are more limited in scope than are those of the European initiative. National treatment and national sovereignty are preserved. However, the delicate issue of national responsibility for failing institutions, and its relationship to monetary policies, is not addressed. A Better Alternative A productive basis for international regulation can be formulated around three principles: 1. free entry for foreign-owned subsidiaries chartered under the laws of the host country; 2. national treatment for those subsidiaries; and 3. national responsibility for (a) monetary policy, (b) prevention of unwarranted financial panics in domestically chartered institutions, whether foreign or domestically owned, and (c) supervision of all domestically chartered institutions, regardless of ownership |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (VII, 202 p. 4 illus) |
ISBN: | 9781468467147 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046872878 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200828s1991 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781468467147 |9 978-1-4684-6714-7 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-2-SBE)978-1-4684-6714-7 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)903195093 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046872878 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-634 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 500 |2 23 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation |c edited by Catherine England |
264 | 1 | |a Boston, MA |b Springer US |c 1991 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (VII, 202 p. 4 illus) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions | |
520 | |a Risk-based capital standards presume a need for common capital standards across countries. The details of forging an agreement were left to the staffs of the primary bank regulators in each country, and compromises were inevitable. Although domestic constituencies' reactions to the proposals were invited, the arduous negotiations that led to the proposals generated intense pressure on the principals not to make changes. The European Community's approach to financial integration seems to be driven by a political desire to achieve an integrated market within Europe, despite significant institutional differences among countries. Underlying that desire is a belief that the market pressures that result from different regulatory systems operating in the same market will produce the right answer. The financial provisions of the U.S.-Canada free-trade agreement take a direction that, in my judgment, is more productive. The provisions are more limited in scope than are those of the European initiative. National treatment and national sovereignty are preserved. However, the delicate issue of national responsibility for failing institutions, and its relationship to monetary policies, is not addressed. A Better Alternative A productive basis for international regulation can be formulated around three principles: 1. free entry for foreign-owned subsidiaries chartered under the laws of the host country; 2. national treatment for those subsidiaries; and 3. national responsibility for (a) monetary policy, (b) prevention of unwarranted financial panics in domestically chartered institutions, whether foreign or domestically owned, and (c) supervision of all domestically chartered institutions, regardless of ownership | ||
650 | 4 | |a Science | |
650 | 4 | |a Science, general | |
650 | 4 | |a Science | |
700 | 1 | |a England, Catherine |4 edt | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9781468467161 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-2-SBE |a ZDB-2-BAE | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032283010 | ||
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 |l BTU01 |p ZDB-2-SBE |q ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804181722361757696 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author2 | England, Catherine |
author2_role | edt |
author2_variant | c e ce |
author_facet | England, Catherine |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046872878 |
collection | ZDB-2-SBE ZDB-2-BAE |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-2-SBE)978-1-4684-6714-7 (OCoLC)903195093 (DE-599)BVBBV046872878 |
dewey-full | 500 |
dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
dewey-ones | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
dewey-raw | 500 |
dewey-search | 500 |
dewey-sort | 3500 |
dewey-tens | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
discipline | Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03123nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046872878</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200828s1991 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781468467147</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4684-6714-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-2-SBE)978-1-4684-6714-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)903195093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046872878</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Catherine England</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Boston, MA</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer US</subfield><subfield code="c">1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (VII, 202 p. 4 illus)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Risk-based capital standards presume a need for common capital standards across countries. The details of forging an agreement were left to the staffs of the primary bank regulators in each country, and compromises were inevitable. Although domestic constituencies' reactions to the proposals were invited, the arduous negotiations that led to the proposals generated intense pressure on the principals not to make changes. The European Community's approach to financial integration seems to be driven by a political desire to achieve an integrated market within Europe, despite significant institutional differences among countries. Underlying that desire is a belief that the market pressures that result from different regulatory systems operating in the same market will produce the right answer. The financial provisions of the U.S.-Canada free-trade agreement take a direction that, in my judgment, is more productive. The provisions are more limited in scope than are those of the European initiative. National treatment and national sovereignty are preserved. However, the delicate issue of national responsibility for failing institutions, and its relationship to monetary policies, is not addressed. A Better Alternative A productive basis for international regulation can be formulated around three principles: 1. free entry for foreign-owned subsidiaries chartered under the laws of the host country; 2. national treatment for those subsidiaries; and 3. national responsibility for (a) monetary policy, (b) prevention of unwarranted financial panics in domestically chartered institutions, whether foreign or domestically owned, and (c) supervision of all domestically chartered institutions, regardless of ownership</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science, general</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">England, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9781468467161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SBE</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-BAE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032283010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7</subfield><subfield code="l">BTU01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-SBE</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV046872878 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T15:15:38Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:56:10Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781468467147 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032283010 |
oclc_num | 903195093 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-634 |
owner_facet | DE-634 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (VII, 202 p. 4 illus) |
psigel | ZDB-2-SBE ZDB-2-BAE ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv ZDB-2-SBE ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv |
publishDate | 1991 |
publishDateSearch | 1991 |
publishDateSort | 1991 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions |
spelling | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation edited by Catherine England Boston, MA Springer US 1991 1 Online-Ressource (VII, 202 p. 4 illus) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions Risk-based capital standards presume a need for common capital standards across countries. The details of forging an agreement were left to the staffs of the primary bank regulators in each country, and compromises were inevitable. Although domestic constituencies' reactions to the proposals were invited, the arduous negotiations that led to the proposals generated intense pressure on the principals not to make changes. The European Community's approach to financial integration seems to be driven by a political desire to achieve an integrated market within Europe, despite significant institutional differences among countries. Underlying that desire is a belief that the market pressures that result from different regulatory systems operating in the same market will produce the right answer. The financial provisions of the U.S.-Canada free-trade agreement take a direction that, in my judgment, is more productive. The provisions are more limited in scope than are those of the European initiative. National treatment and national sovereignty are preserved. However, the delicate issue of national responsibility for failing institutions, and its relationship to monetary policies, is not addressed. A Better Alternative A productive basis for international regulation can be formulated around three principles: 1. free entry for foreign-owned subsidiaries chartered under the laws of the host country; 2. national treatment for those subsidiaries; and 3. national responsibility for (a) monetary policy, (b) prevention of unwarranted financial panics in domestically chartered institutions, whether foreign or domestically owned, and (c) supervision of all domestically chartered institutions, regardless of ownership Science Science, general England, Catherine edt Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9781468467161 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation Science Science, general |
title | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation |
title_auth | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation |
title_exact_search | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation |
title_exact_search_txtP | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation |
title_full | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation edited by Catherine England |
title_fullStr | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation edited by Catherine England |
title_full_unstemmed | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation edited by Catherine England |
title_short | Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation |
title_sort | governing banking s future markets vs regulation |
topic | Science Science, general |
topic_facet | Science Science, general |
url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT englandcatherine governingbankingsfuturemarketsvsregulation |