Newborn imitation: the stakes of a controversy
Newborn imitation has recently become the focus of a major controversy in the human sciences. New studies have reexamined the evidence and found it wanting. Imitation has been regarded as a crucial capability of neonates ever since 1977, when two American psychologists first published experiments ap...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Newborn imitation has recently become the focus of a major controversy in the human sciences. New studies have reexamined the evidence and found it wanting. Imitation has been regarded as a crucial capability of neonates ever since 1977, when two American psychologists first published experiments appearing to demonstrate that babies at birth are able to copy a variety of facial movements. The findings overturned decades of assumptions about the competence of newborns. But what if claims for newborn imitation are not true? Influential theories about the mechanisms underlying imitation, the role of mirror neurons, the nature of the self and of infant mental states, will all have to be modified or abandoned if it turns out that babies cannot imitate at birth. This Element offers a critical assessment of those theories and the stakes involved |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Jul 2020) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (74 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781108920308 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781108920308 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046854472 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200814s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108920308 |c Online |9 978-1-108-92030-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781108920308 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108920308 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1193283576 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046854472 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 155.413 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Leys, Ruth |d 1939- |0 (DE-588)1154557774 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Newborn imitation |b the stakes of a controversy |c Ruth Leys |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (74 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Jul 2020) | ||
| 520 | |a Newborn imitation has recently become the focus of a major controversy in the human sciences. New studies have reexamined the evidence and found it wanting. Imitation has been regarded as a crucial capability of neonates ever since 1977, when two American psychologists first published experiments appearing to demonstrate that babies at birth are able to copy a variety of facial movements. The findings overturned decades of assumptions about the competence of newborns. But what if claims for newborn imitation are not true? Influential theories about the mechanisms underlying imitation, the role of mirror neurons, the nature of the self and of infant mental states, will all have to be modified or abandoned if it turns out that babies cannot imitate at birth. This Element offers a critical assessment of those theories and the stakes involved | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Imitation in children | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Newborn infants | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-108-82673-0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032263240 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181690513358848 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Leys, Ruth 1939- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1154557774 |
| author_facet | Leys, Ruth 1939- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Leys, Ruth 1939- |
| author_variant | r l rl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046854472 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108920308 (OCoLC)1193283576 (DE-599)BVBBV046854472 |
| dewey-full | 155.413 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 155 - Differential & developmental psychology |
| dewey-raw | 155.413 |
| dewey-search | 155.413 |
| dewey-sort | 3155.413 |
| dewey-tens | 150 - Psychology |
| discipline | Psychologie |
| discipline_str_mv | Psychologie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781108920308 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02314nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046854472</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200814s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108920308</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-92030-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781108920308</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108920308</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1193283576</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046854472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">155.413</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leys, Ruth</subfield><subfield code="d">1939-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1154557774</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Newborn imitation</subfield><subfield code="b">the stakes of a controversy</subfield><subfield code="c">Ruth Leys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (74 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Jul 2020)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Newborn imitation has recently become the focus of a major controversy in the human sciences. New studies have reexamined the evidence and found it wanting. Imitation has been regarded as a crucial capability of neonates ever since 1977, when two American psychologists first published experiments appearing to demonstrate that babies at birth are able to copy a variety of facial movements. The findings overturned decades of assumptions about the competence of newborns. But what if claims for newborn imitation are not true? Influential theories about the mechanisms underlying imitation, the role of mirror neurons, the nature of the self and of infant mental states, will all have to be modified or abandoned if it turns out that babies cannot imitate at birth. This Element offers a critical assessment of those theories and the stakes involved</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Imitation in children</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Newborn infants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-82673-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032263240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046854472 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:10:54Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:55:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108920308 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032263240 |
| oclc_num | 1193283576 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (74 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Leys, Ruth 1939- (DE-588)1154557774 aut Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy Ruth Leys Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2020 1 Online-Ressource (74 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Jul 2020) Newborn imitation has recently become the focus of a major controversy in the human sciences. New studies have reexamined the evidence and found it wanting. Imitation has been regarded as a crucial capability of neonates ever since 1977, when two American psychologists first published experiments appearing to demonstrate that babies at birth are able to copy a variety of facial movements. The findings overturned decades of assumptions about the competence of newborns. But what if claims for newborn imitation are not true? Influential theories about the mechanisms underlying imitation, the role of mirror neurons, the nature of the self and of infant mental states, will all have to be modified or abandoned if it turns out that babies cannot imitate at birth. This Element offers a critical assessment of those theories and the stakes involved Imitation in children Newborn infants Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-108-82673-0 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Leys, Ruth 1939- Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy Imitation in children Newborn infants |
| title | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy |
| title_auth | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy |
| title_exact_search | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy |
| title_full | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy Ruth Leys |
| title_fullStr | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy Ruth Leys |
| title_full_unstemmed | Newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy Ruth Leys |
| title_short | Newborn imitation |
| title_sort | newborn imitation the stakes of a controversy |
| title_sub | the stakes of a controversy |
| topic | Imitation in children Newborn infants |
| topic_facet | Imitation in children Newborn infants |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920308 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leysruth newbornimitationthestakesofacontroversy |