Framing risky choices: Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums
"The majority of policymakers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don't like change or uncertainty. So why did the British...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Montreal ; Kingston ; London ; Chicago
McGill-Queen's University Press
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The majority of policymakers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don't like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger picture of EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from extensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect--mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines--matters, but not every argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing people's minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argument is not its empirical validity but its public appeal." |
| Beschreibung: | Index |
| Beschreibung: | xii, 244 Seiten Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9780228000808 9780228000792 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046787292 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200831 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200701s2020 |||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780228000808 |c pbk. |9 978-0-228-00080-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780228000792 |c hbk. |9 978-0-228-00079-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1193304713 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046787292 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-384 | ||
| 084 | |a MG 42080 |0 (DE-625)122841:12045 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MG 42450 |0 (DE-625)122841:12146 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Atikcan, Ece Özlem |d 1982- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1079281827 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Framing risky choices |b Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums |c Ece Özlem Atikcan, Richard Nadeau, and Éric Bélanger |
| 264 | 1 | |a Montreal ; Kingston ; London ; Chicago |b McGill-Queen's University Press |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a xii, 244 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Index | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The Brexit Conundrum -- The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective -- Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign -- How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? -- How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? -- Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcomeand Some Do Not? -- Arguing for and against Borders | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "The majority of policymakers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don't like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger picture of EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from extensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect--mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines--matters, but not every argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing people's minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argument is not its empirical validity but its public appeal." | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidung bei Risiko |0 (DE-588)4225781-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Brexit |0 (DE-588)1109778066 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Volksabstimmung |0 (DE-588)4134790-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 2 | |a European Union / Great Britain | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Référendum / Great Britain | |
| 653 | 2 | |a European Union | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Référendum | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Great Britain | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Brexit |0 (DE-588)1109778066 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Volksabstimmung |0 (DE-588)4134790-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Entscheidung bei Risiko |0 (DE-588)4225781-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nadeau, Richard |d 1956- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)171124030 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bélanger, Eric |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1188588494 |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, ePDF |z 978-0-228-00224-6 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, ePUB |z 978-0-228-00225-3 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032196316 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181573931630592 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Figures and Tables vii Acknowledgments xi 1 The Brexit Conundrum 3 2 The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective 34 3 Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign 71 4 How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? 95 5 How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? 6 Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcome and Some Do Not? 151 7 Arguing for and against Borders APPENDICES 1 Interviews 187 2 Data and Variables 3 Tables zoo Notes Z03 Bibliography Index 237 217 195 168 1x4
Political studies, communication studies The majority of policy-makers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don’t like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger pietu re ol EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from ex tensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect — mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines — matters, but not ev ery argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing people’s minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argu ment is not its empirical validity but its public appeal.
|
| adam_txt |
Contents Figures and Tables vii Acknowledgments xi 1 The Brexit Conundrum 3 2 The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective 34 3 Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign 71 4 How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? 95 5 How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? 6 Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcome and Some Do Not? 151 7 Arguing for and against Borders APPENDICES 1 Interviews 187 2 Data and Variables 3 Tables zoo Notes Z03 Bibliography Index 237 217 195 168 1x4
Political studies, communication studies The majority of policy-makers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don’t like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger pietu re ol EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from ex tensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect — mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines — matters, but not ev ery argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing people’s minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argu ment is not its empirical validity but its public appeal. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Atikcan, Ece Özlem 1982- Nadeau, Richard 1956- Bélanger, Eric |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1079281827 (DE-588)171124030 (DE-588)1188588494 |
| author_facet | Atikcan, Ece Özlem 1982- Nadeau, Richard 1956- Bélanger, Eric |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Atikcan, Ece Özlem 1982- |
| author_variant | e ö a eö eöa r n rn e b eb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046787292 |
| classification_rvk | MG 42080 MG 42450 |
| contents | The Brexit Conundrum -- The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective -- Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign -- How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? -- How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? -- Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcomeand Some Do Not? -- Arguing for and against Borders |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1193304713 (DE-599)BVBBV046787292 |
| discipline | Politologie |
| discipline_str_mv | Politologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04527nam a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046787292</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200831 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200701s2020 |||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780228000808</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-228-00080-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780228000792</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-228-00079-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1193304713</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046787292</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 42080</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122841:12045</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 42450</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122841:12146</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Atikcan, Ece Özlem</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1079281827</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Framing risky choices</subfield><subfield code="b">Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums</subfield><subfield code="c">Ece Özlem Atikcan, Richard Nadeau, and Éric Bélanger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Montreal ; Kingston ; London ; Chicago</subfield><subfield code="b">McGill-Queen's University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 244 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Brexit Conundrum -- The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective -- Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign -- How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? -- How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? -- Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcomeand Some Do Not? -- Arguing for and against Borders</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The majority of policymakers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don't like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger picture of EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from extensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect--mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines--matters, but not every argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing people's minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argument is not its empirical validity but its public appeal."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidung bei Risiko</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4225781-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Brexit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1109778066</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Volksabstimmung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4134790-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">European Union / Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Référendum / Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">European Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Référendum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brexit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1109778066</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Volksabstimmung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4134790-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Entscheidung bei Risiko</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4225781-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nadeau, Richard</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)171124030</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bélanger, Eric</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1188588494</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, ePDF</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-228-00224-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, ePUB</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-228-00225-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032196316</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Großbritannien |
| id | DE-604.BV046787292 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T14:51:58Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:53:49Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780228000808 9780228000792 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032196316 |
| oclc_num | 1193304713 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-384 |
| physical | xii, 244 Seiten Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | McGill-Queen's University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Atikcan, Ece Özlem 1982- Verfasser (DE-588)1079281827 aut Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums Ece Özlem Atikcan, Richard Nadeau, and Éric Bélanger Montreal ; Kingston ; London ; Chicago McGill-Queen's University Press 2020 xii, 244 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Index The Brexit Conundrum -- The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective -- Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign -- How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? -- How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? -- Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcomeand Some Do Not? -- Arguing for and against Borders "The majority of policymakers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters don't like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger picture of EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from extensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect--mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines--matters, but not every argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing people's minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argument is not its empirical validity but its public appeal." Entscheidung bei Risiko (DE-588)4225781-5 gnd rswk-swf Brexit (DE-588)1109778066 gnd rswk-swf Volksabstimmung (DE-588)4134790-0 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf European Union / Great Britain Référendum / Great Britain European Union Référendum Great Britain Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g Brexit (DE-588)1109778066 s Volksabstimmung (DE-588)4134790-0 s Entscheidung bei Risiko (DE-588)4225781-5 s DE-604 Nadeau, Richard 1956- Verfasser (DE-588)171124030 aut Bélanger, Eric Verfasser (DE-588)1188588494 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, ePDF 978-0-228-00224-6 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, ePUB 978-0-228-00225-3 Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Atikcan, Ece Özlem 1982- Nadeau, Richard 1956- Bélanger, Eric Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums The Brexit Conundrum -- The Brexit Campaign in Comparative Perspective -- Preparing and Executing the Brexit Campaign -- How Did the Scapegoating of the European Union Affect the Vote Choice? -- How Did the Perceptions of Risk Affect the Vote Choice? -- Why Do Some Remain Voters Accept the Outcomeand Some Do Not? -- Arguing for and against Borders Entscheidung bei Risiko (DE-588)4225781-5 gnd Brexit (DE-588)1109778066 gnd Volksabstimmung (DE-588)4134790-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4225781-5 (DE-588)1109778066 (DE-588)4134790-0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |
| title | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums |
| title_auth | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums |
| title_exact_search | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums |
| title_full | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums Ece Özlem Atikcan, Richard Nadeau, and Éric Bélanger |
| title_fullStr | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums Ece Özlem Atikcan, Richard Nadeau, and Éric Bélanger |
| title_full_unstemmed | Framing risky choices Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums Ece Özlem Atikcan, Richard Nadeau, and Éric Bélanger |
| title_short | Framing risky choices |
| title_sort | framing risky choices brexit and the dynamics of high stakes referendums |
| title_sub | Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums |
| topic | Entscheidung bei Risiko (DE-588)4225781-5 gnd Brexit (DE-588)1109778066 gnd Volksabstimmung (DE-588)4134790-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Entscheidung bei Risiko Brexit Volksabstimmung Großbritannien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032196316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT atikcaneceozlem framingriskychoicesbrexitandthedynamicsofhighstakesreferendums AT nadeaurichard framingriskychoicesbrexitandthedynamicsofhighstakesreferendums AT belangereric framingriskychoicesbrexitandthedynamicsofhighstakesreferendums |