Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy: a constructive-engagement account
"This book presents a systematic unifying-pluralist account-a "constructive-engagement" account-of how cross-tradition engagement in philosophy is possible. The goal of this "constructive-engagement" account is, by way of reflective criticism, argumentation, and methodologic...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York ; London
Routledge
2020
|
Schriftenreihe: | Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | "This book presents a systematic unifying-pluralist account-a "constructive-engagement" account-of how cross-tradition engagement in philosophy is possible. The goal of this "constructive-engagement" account is, by way of reflective criticism, argumentation, and methodological guiding principles, to inquire into how distinct approaches from different philosophical traditions can talk to and learn from each other for the sake of making joint contributions to the contemporary development of philosophy. In Part I of the book, Bo Mou explores a range of fundamental theoretic and methodological issues in cross-tradition philosophical engagement and philosophical interpretation. In Part II, he analyzes several representative case studies that demonstrate how relevant resources in the Western and Chinese philosophical traditions can constructively engage with each other. These studies cover issues in philosophical methodology, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics. The book's theoretical and practical approaches expand the vision, coverage, and agenda of doing philosophy comparatively, and promote worldwide joint efforts of cross-tradition philosophical inquiries. Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy will be of interest to graduate students and scholars interested in comparative philosophy and the intersection of Chinese and Western philosophy. It will also appeal to those who are interested in the ways in which cross-tradition philosophical engagement can enhance contemporary philosophical debates in metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics"-- |
Beschreibung: | xviii, 427 Seiten Illustration 25 cm |
ISBN: | 9780367360412 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046783234 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20201118 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 200628s2020 a||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780367360412 |c hardback |9 978-0-367-36041-2 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1190919045 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046783234 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-11 | ||
084 | |a CD 1040 |0 (DE-625)17716: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mou, Bo |d 1956- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)135765943 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy |b a constructive-engagement account |c Bo Mou |
264 | 1 | |a New York ; London |b Routledge |c 2020 | |
300 | |a xviii, 427 Seiten |b Illustration |c 25 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy | |
520 | 3 | |a "This book presents a systematic unifying-pluralist account-a "constructive-engagement" account-of how cross-tradition engagement in philosophy is possible. The goal of this "constructive-engagement" account is, by way of reflective criticism, argumentation, and methodological guiding principles, to inquire into how distinct approaches from different philosophical traditions can talk to and learn from each other for the sake of making joint contributions to the contemporary development of philosophy. In Part I of the book, Bo Mou explores a range of fundamental theoretic and methodological issues in cross-tradition philosophical engagement and philosophical interpretation. In Part II, he analyzes several representative case studies that demonstrate how relevant resources in the Western and Chinese philosophical traditions can constructively engage with each other. These studies cover issues in philosophical methodology, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics. The book's theoretical and practical approaches expand the vision, coverage, and agenda of doing philosophy comparatively, and promote worldwide joint efforts of cross-tradition philosophical inquiries. Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy will be of interest to graduate students and scholars interested in comparative philosophy and the intersection of Chinese and Western philosophy. It will also appeal to those who are interested in the ways in which cross-tradition philosophical engagement can enhance contemporary philosophical debates in metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics"-- | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Vergleichende Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4187728-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konstruktivismus |g Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4032237-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | 0 | |a Philosophy, Comparative / Case studies | |
653 | 0 | |a Philosophy, Comparative | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Vergleichende Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4187728-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Konstruktivismus |g Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4032237-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Online version |a Mou, Bo, 1956- |t Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy |d New York : Routledge, 2020 |z 9780429346200 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032192353&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032192353 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804181566495129600 |
---|---|
adam_text | Contents Preface and Acknowledgments Introduction PARTI Theoretic Foundations: How Cross-Tradition Engagement is Possible 1 Normative Bases for Engagement 1.1 Double Aboutness and Double Reference as Normative Basis 35 1.2 Pre-tbeoretic Understanding of Truth as Normative Basis 63 1.3 Intrinsic Connection of Two Normative Bases 71 1.4 Chapter Summary 78 2 The Issue of Incommensurability 2.1 The Identity of the Issue of Incommensurability: Where the Challenges Are 87 2.2 The Normative Bases for Rejecting Incommensurability and Bridging Different Conceptual Schemes 90 2.3 A “Double-Reference” Approach to Radical Translation and Interpretation 106 2.4 Evaluative Incommensurability: The Case of Human Morality 117 2.5 Chapter Summary 128
viii 3 Contents The Issue of Philosophical Interpretation 3.1 Characteristic Features of Philosophical Interpretation in Cross-Tradition Engagement 134 3.2 A Three-Phase-Engagement Characterization: Engagement-Guiding Contributors and a Synchronic-Multiple-Dimension Model 140 3.3 The “External-Resources-Employment’’ Issue 149 3.4 The “Generalization Issue 166 3.5 The Issue of How It Is Possible for Specialists in Distinct Connections to Jointly Contribute 179 3.6 Chapter Summary 187 PART II Case Analyses 4 Yin-Yang and Hegelian Models of How to Look at Contraries: An Overall-Complementarity-Seeking Account 4.1 Strategy and Engaging Features of Case Analyses 198 4.2 Yin-Yang Methodological Model of How to Look at Contraries 203 4.3 The Hegelian Methodological Model of How to Look at Contraries 208 4.4 How It Is Possible for the Yin-Yang Model to Work Together with the Hegelian Model: An Overall-Complementarity-Seeking Account 213 4.5 Chapter Summary 220 5 Confucius’s and Socrates’s Distinct Perspectives in Treating the Issue of Filial-Piety Virtue 5.1 An Analysis of Socrates’s Elenchus Approach: A Case on the Issue of Filial Piety 225 5.2 Perspective Dimension of Socrates’s Elenchus and the Analytic Method 234 5.3 An Analysis of Confucius’s Methodological Perspective on the Issue of Filial Piety 237 5.4 Confucius’s Version of the Golden Rule as A Way of Bridging “Situational-Aspect-Concerned” and “Across-the-Board-Ren-Virtue-Concerned” Perspectives 244
Contents 5.5 5.6 6 7 8 9 ix How It Is Possible for Socrates-Style “BeingAspect-Concerned” Perspective and ConfuciusStyle “Becoming-Aspect-Concerned” Perspective to Be Complementary 249 Chapter Summary 254 Daoist Approach to the Issue of Being in Engaging with Quinean and Heideggerian Approaches 6.1 Engaging Background: Quinean and Heideggerian Approaches 259 6.2 Lao-Zhuang’s Daoist Approach: Toward A Unifying Pluralist Account 266 6.3 Chapter Summary 279 Zhuang Zi’s and Quine’s Naturalist Approaches to Epistemology 7.1 A General Account of Two Types of Naturalism 287 7.2 Engaging with Quine: Two Engaging Fronts 292 7.3 How Zhuang Zi Can Make Engaging Contributions 297 7.4 Chapter Summary 309 Gongsun Long’s Approach to the “White-Horse-NotHorse” Thesis and Its Engagement with Fregean and Kripkean Approaches to the Issue of Reference 8.1 An Examination of Gongsun Long’s “DoubleReference” Thought in Treating the “WhiteHorse-Not-Horse” Thesis 317 8.2 Engaging with Fregean and Kripkean Approaches to the Issue of Reference 335 8.3 Chapter Summary 342 Later Mohist Approach and Modern Logic Resources in Treating Logical Inference 9.1 Later Mohist Semantic-Sensitivity Diagnosis on Parallel Inference 349 9.2 The Later Mohist Contribution to Understanding the Structure and Content of Law of Identity with Relative-Identity Sensitivity Concerning Logical Inference 355 9.3 Chapter Summary 367 258 285 316 349
x Contents Conclusion: Toward Constructively Engaging 371 Appendixes Appendix 1 Comparative Chronology of Philosophers in Chinese and Western Philosophical Traditions (as Samples) Appendix 2 Note on Transcription and Guide to Pronunciation Appendix 3 An Expanded Predicate Logic Account with Enhanced Identity Sign and Collective-Generic Operator and with Naturalist Semantic Interpretation References Index 383 385 389 391 408 422
|
adam_txt |
Contents Preface and Acknowledgments Introduction PARTI Theoretic Foundations: How Cross-Tradition Engagement is Possible 1 Normative Bases for Engagement 1.1 Double Aboutness and Double Reference as Normative Basis 35 1.2 Pre-tbeoretic Understanding of Truth as Normative Basis 63 1.3 Intrinsic Connection of Two Normative Bases 71 1.4 Chapter Summary 78 2 The Issue of Incommensurability 2.1 The Identity of the Issue of Incommensurability: Where the Challenges Are 87 2.2 The Normative Bases for Rejecting Incommensurability and Bridging Different Conceptual Schemes 90 2.3 A “Double-Reference” Approach to Radical Translation and Interpretation 106 2.4 Evaluative Incommensurability: The Case of Human Morality 117 2.5 Chapter Summary 128
viii 3 Contents The Issue of Philosophical Interpretation 3.1 Characteristic Features of Philosophical Interpretation in Cross-Tradition Engagement 134 3.2 A Three-Phase-Engagement Characterization: Engagement-Guiding Contributors and a Synchronic-Multiple-Dimension Model 140 3.3 The “External-Resources-Employment’’ Issue 149 3.4 The “Generalization" Issue 166 3.5 The Issue of How It Is Possible for Specialists in Distinct Connections to Jointly Contribute 179 3.6 Chapter Summary 187 PART II Case Analyses 4 Yin-Yang and Hegelian Models of How to Look at Contraries: An Overall-Complementarity-Seeking Account 4.1 Strategy and Engaging Features of Case Analyses 198 4.2 Yin-Yang Methodological Model of How to Look at Contraries 203 4.3 The Hegelian Methodological Model of How to Look at Contraries 208 4.4 How It Is Possible for the Yin-Yang Model to Work Together with the Hegelian Model: An Overall-Complementarity-Seeking Account 213 4.5 Chapter Summary 220 5 Confucius’s and Socrates’s Distinct Perspectives in Treating the Issue of Filial-Piety Virtue 5.1 An Analysis of Socrates’s Elenchus Approach: A Case on the Issue of Filial Piety 225 5.2 Perspective Dimension of Socrates’s Elenchus and the Analytic Method 234 5.3 An Analysis of Confucius’s Methodological Perspective on the Issue of Filial Piety 237 5.4 Confucius’s Version of the Golden Rule as A Way of Bridging “Situational-Aspect-Concerned” and “Across-the-Board-Ren-Virtue-Concerned” Perspectives 244
Contents 5.5 5.6 6 7 8 9 ix How It Is Possible for Socrates-Style “BeingAspect-Concerned” Perspective and ConfuciusStyle “Becoming-Aspect-Concerned” Perspective to Be Complementary 249 Chapter Summary 254 Daoist Approach to the Issue of Being in Engaging with Quinean and Heideggerian Approaches 6.1 Engaging Background: Quinean and Heideggerian Approaches 259 6.2 Lao-Zhuang’s Daoist Approach: Toward A Unifying Pluralist Account 266 6.3 Chapter Summary 279 Zhuang Zi’s and Quine’s Naturalist Approaches to Epistemology 7.1 A General Account of Two Types of Naturalism 287 7.2 Engaging with Quine: Two Engaging Fronts 292 7.3 How Zhuang Zi Can Make Engaging Contributions 297 7.4 Chapter Summary 309 Gongsun Long’s Approach to the “White-Horse-NotHorse” Thesis and Its Engagement with Fregean and Kripkean Approaches to the Issue of Reference 8.1 An Examination of Gongsun Long’s “DoubleReference” Thought in Treating the “WhiteHorse-Not-Horse” Thesis 317 8.2 Engaging with Fregean and Kripkean Approaches to the Issue of Reference 335 8.3 Chapter Summary 342 Later Mohist Approach and Modern Logic Resources in Treating Logical Inference 9.1 Later Mohist Semantic-Sensitivity Diagnosis on Parallel Inference 349 9.2 The Later Mohist Contribution to Understanding the Structure and Content of Law of Identity with Relative-Identity Sensitivity Concerning Logical Inference 355 9.3 Chapter Summary 367 258 285 316 349
x Contents Conclusion: Toward Constructively Engaging 371 Appendixes Appendix 1 Comparative Chronology of Philosophers in Chinese and Western Philosophical Traditions (as Samples) Appendix 2 Note on Transcription and Guide to Pronunciation Appendix 3 An Expanded Predicate Logic Account with Enhanced Identity Sign and Collective-Generic Operator and with Naturalist Semantic Interpretation References Index 383 385 389 391 408 422 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Mou, Bo 1956- |
author_GND | (DE-588)135765943 |
author_facet | Mou, Bo 1956- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Mou, Bo 1956- |
author_variant | b m bm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046783234 |
classification_rvk | CD 1040 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1190919045 (DE-599)BVBBV046783234 |
discipline | Philosophie |
discipline_str_mv | Philosophie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03371nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046783234</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201118 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200628s2020 a||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780367360412</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-367-36041-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1190919045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046783234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CD 1040</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17716:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mou, Bo</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)135765943</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy</subfield><subfield code="b">a constructive-engagement account</subfield><subfield code="c">Bo Mou</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York ; London</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xviii, 427 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustration</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book presents a systematic unifying-pluralist account-a "constructive-engagement" account-of how cross-tradition engagement in philosophy is possible. The goal of this "constructive-engagement" account is, by way of reflective criticism, argumentation, and methodological guiding principles, to inquire into how distinct approaches from different philosophical traditions can talk to and learn from each other for the sake of making joint contributions to the contemporary development of philosophy. In Part I of the book, Bo Mou explores a range of fundamental theoretic and methodological issues in cross-tradition philosophical engagement and philosophical interpretation. In Part II, he analyzes several representative case studies that demonstrate how relevant resources in the Western and Chinese philosophical traditions can constructively engage with each other. These studies cover issues in philosophical methodology, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics. The book's theoretical and practical approaches expand the vision, coverage, and agenda of doing philosophy comparatively, and promote worldwide joint efforts of cross-tradition philosophical inquiries. Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy will be of interest to graduate students and scholars interested in comparative philosophy and the intersection of Chinese and Western philosophy. It will also appeal to those who are interested in the ways in which cross-tradition philosophical engagement can enhance contemporary philosophical debates in metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vergleichende Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187728-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konstruktivismus</subfield><subfield code="g">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032237-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy, Comparative / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy, Comparative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vergleichende Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187728-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konstruktivismus</subfield><subfield code="g">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032237-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Online version</subfield><subfield code="a">Mou, Bo, 1956-</subfield><subfield code="t">Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Routledge, 2020</subfield><subfield code="z">9780429346200</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032192353&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032192353</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV046783234 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T14:50:39Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:53:42Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780367360412 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032192353 |
oclc_num | 1190919045 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-11 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-11 |
physical | xviii, 427 Seiten Illustration 25 cm |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy |
spelling | Mou, Bo 1956- Verfasser (DE-588)135765943 aut Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account Bo Mou New York ; London Routledge 2020 xviii, 427 Seiten Illustration 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy "This book presents a systematic unifying-pluralist account-a "constructive-engagement" account-of how cross-tradition engagement in philosophy is possible. The goal of this "constructive-engagement" account is, by way of reflective criticism, argumentation, and methodological guiding principles, to inquire into how distinct approaches from different philosophical traditions can talk to and learn from each other for the sake of making joint contributions to the contemporary development of philosophy. In Part I of the book, Bo Mou explores a range of fundamental theoretic and methodological issues in cross-tradition philosophical engagement and philosophical interpretation. In Part II, he analyzes several representative case studies that demonstrate how relevant resources in the Western and Chinese philosophical traditions can constructively engage with each other. These studies cover issues in philosophical methodology, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics. The book's theoretical and practical approaches expand the vision, coverage, and agenda of doing philosophy comparatively, and promote worldwide joint efforts of cross-tradition philosophical inquiries. Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy will be of interest to graduate students and scholars interested in comparative philosophy and the intersection of Chinese and Western philosophy. It will also appeal to those who are interested in the ways in which cross-tradition philosophical engagement can enhance contemporary philosophical debates in metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and ethics"-- Vergleichende Philosophie (DE-588)4187728-7 gnd rswk-swf Konstruktivismus Philosophie (DE-588)4032237-3 gnd rswk-swf Philosophy, Comparative / Case studies Philosophy, Comparative Vergleichende Philosophie (DE-588)4187728-7 s Konstruktivismus Philosophie (DE-588)4032237-3 s DE-604 Online version Mou, Bo, 1956- Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy New York : Routledge, 2020 9780429346200 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032192353&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Mou, Bo 1956- Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account Vergleichende Philosophie (DE-588)4187728-7 gnd Konstruktivismus Philosophie (DE-588)4032237-3 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4187728-7 (DE-588)4032237-3 |
title | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account |
title_auth | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account |
title_exact_search | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account |
title_exact_search_txtP | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account |
title_full | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account Bo Mou |
title_fullStr | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account Bo Mou |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive-engagement account Bo Mou |
title_short | Cross-tradition engagement in philosophy |
title_sort | cross tradition engagement in philosophy a constructive engagement account |
title_sub | a constructive-engagement account |
topic | Vergleichende Philosophie (DE-588)4187728-7 gnd Konstruktivismus Philosophie (DE-588)4032237-3 gnd |
topic_facet | Vergleichende Philosophie Konstruktivismus Philosophie |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032192353&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moubo crosstraditionengagementinphilosophyaconstructiveengagementaccount |