The factive-reported distinction in English:
This study offers a reconceptualization of the factive presupposition. It presents a cognitive-functional account based on three central features: the event structure of semantic classes of matrix predicates, the sources of modal stances in the complement clause, and the coercive potential of predic...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin ; Boston
De Gruyter Mouton
[2020]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]
volume 342 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | This study offers a reconceptualization of the factive presupposition. It presents a cognitive-functional account based on three central features: the event structure of semantic classes of matrix predicates, the sources of modal stances in the complement clause, and the coercive potential of predicate-complement combinations. In this way the study complements the dominant formal pragmatic and formal syntactic theories on factivity |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 06. Apr 2020) |
| Beschreibung: | XVII, 253 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9783110666076 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046774497 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200630 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200622s2020 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110666076 |9 978-3-11-066607-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1164650461 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046774497 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-11 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a HF 290 |0 (DE-625)48837: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gentens, Caroline |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1172242283 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The factive-reported distinction in English |c Caroline Gentens |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin ; Boston |b De Gruyter Mouton |c [2020] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2020 | |
| 300 | |a XVII, 253 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] |v volume 342 | |
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 06. Apr 2020) | ||
| 520 | |a This study offers a reconceptualization of the factive presupposition. It presents a cognitive-functional account based on three central features: the event structure of semantic classes of matrix predicates, the sources of modal stances in the complement clause, and the coercive potential of predicate-complement combinations. In this way the study complements the dominant formal pragmatic and formal syntactic theories on factivity | ||
| 546 | |a In English | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a - complement clauses can be semantically unaffected, affected, or effected by the main clause situation - factive complements can contain speaker-related modal markings related to a variety of modal sources - predicate-complement combinations can induce constructional reinterpretations | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Komplementierung |0 (DE-588)4164879-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Faktivität |0 (DE-588)4153599-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Englisch |0 (DE-588)4014777-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Englisch |0 (DE-588)4014777-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Faktivität |0 (DE-588)4153599-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Komplementierung |0 (DE-588)4164879-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-3-11-066969-5 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] |v volume 342 |w (DE-604)BV000000738 |9 342 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032183829&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032183829 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181550955233280 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Acknowledgements------ xi Figures----- xiii Tables------ xv Abbreviations------ xvii 1 1.1 Introduction----- 1 The what, why, and how in brief----- 1 2 2.1 Prior definitions of factivity. Disparate views----- 8 The factive presupposition----- 9 2.1.1 2.1.2 From philosophy to logical semantics-------9 Pragmatic presupposition----- 13 2.1.3 Interpersonal value of the factive presupposition—18 2.1.3.1 2.1.3.2 Entity types------ 19 Interpersonal marking in complement clauses----- 23 2.1.3.2.1 2.1.3.2.2 Functional layers: grammatical restrictions on entity types—23 Functional layers: grammatical restrictions on factive complements----- 25 2.1.3.2.3 Asserted complement clauses and main clause phenomena — 27 2.1.4 The alternative approach: representational and interpersonal semantics----- 31 2.2 Factive complement clauses as nominalized clauses----- 33 2.2.1 Formal approaches----- 36 2.2.2 Cognitive-functional approaches---- 38 2.3 The matching problem: complement types and complement-taking 2.4 Aims----- 48 predicates----- 41 3 Representational semantics----- 49 3.1 Introduction----- 49 3.2 A three-way semantic classification----- 50 3.2.1 The semantic classification in simple clauses: creation and manipulation----- 50 3.2.1.1 Created vs. pre-existent objects-------50 3.2.1.2 Manipulated vs. unaffected pre-existent objects------ 51 3.2.1.3 The two parameters combined------52 3.2.2 The semantic classification of finite complement clauses----- 56 3.2.2.1 Created vs. pre-existent clauses------ 57
viii — Contents 3.2.2.2 3.2.2.3 3.2.3 3.2.3.1 3.2.3.2 3.2.3.2.1 3.2.3.2.2 3.2.3.2.3 3.3 Manipulated vs. unaffected clauses-----61 The two parameters combined-----64 Aspectual analysis----- 65 Theoretical prerequisites: situation types----- 68 Analysis----- 72 Reporting constructions-----72 Manipulative constructions-----76 Factive constructions------ 79 Conclusion-----84 4 4.1 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.3 4.4 Interpersonal semantics. Modality----- 89 Introduction-----89 Modality-----91 The interpersonal status of modal auxiliaries-----92 Modality as expressed by the indicative-----96 Speaker-related modal auxiliaries in complement clauses — 98 Modalized attestations of reporting, manipulative, and factive complement clauses-----108 4.4.1 Analysis of modal stance patterns: introduction-----108 4.4.2 Indirect speech or thought constructions--------116 4.4.3 Factive constructions-----120 4.4.3.1 Factive constructions with cognitive predicates----- 121 4.4.3.2 Factive constructions with emotive predicates----- 124 4.4.4 Manipulative constructions —128 4.5 Conclusion------ 133 5 Object extraposition —138 5.1 Introduction-----138 5.2 Theoretical background: factivity and/or givenness-----140 5.3 Methodology: data-----143 5.4 Object extraposition and givenness-----145 5.4.1 Referential givenness-----146 5.4.1.1 Discourse givenness------ 146 5.4.1.2 Hearer givenness------152 5.4.2 5.5 5.5.1 Relational givenness —155 Object extraposition and factivity-----156 Object extraposition: only in factive constructions?-----157 5.5.2 5.5.3 The grammar and form of extraposed object clauses—160
Discursive meaning: emphatic assertion--------165
Contents — ¡X 5.5.4 5.5.4.1 5.5.4.2 5.5.5 5.6 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.5 7 7.1 7.2 7.2.1 7.2.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.5.1 7.5.2 7.5.3 7.6 8 8.1 8.2 The aspectual construal induced by object extraposition---- 168 Factive constructions: aspectual construal by object extraposition---- 168 Manipulative constructions: aspectual construal by object extraposition---- 173 A constructional semantics for object extraposition: occurrential it---- 176 Conclusion------ 181 The diachrony of the fact that-clauses —184 Introduction---- 184 Methodology: data---- 186 Theoretical background-----188 The diachrony of the fact fhof-clauses---- 190 Contexts with restricted alternation —190 The matching problem: factive, manipulative, or reporting contexts---- 195 The semantic value of fact in Late Modern English: truth presupposition?---- 200 Conclusion----- 203 / regret (to say). From factive to reporting construction----- 205 Introduction---- 205 Theoretical background-----208 Parentheticals---- 208 The case of regret---- 209 Methodology: Corpora and data extraction-----210 A synchronic analysis: Discourse contexts for / regret (to say)---- 213 A diachronic analysis: the development of to-infinitives and reported speech patterns---- 219 Early Modern English---- 221 Late Modern English---- 226 Productivity of the diachronic development---- 230 Conclusion----- 232 Conclusions-----234 Summing up---- 234 Briefoutlook---- 237
X ------ Contents References----- 241 Index------ 251
|
| adam_txt |
Contents Acknowledgements------ xi Figures----- xiii Tables------ xv Abbreviations------ xvii 1 1.1 Introduction----- 1 The what, why, and how in brief----- 1 2 2.1 Prior definitions of factivity. Disparate views----- 8 The factive presupposition----- 9 2.1.1 2.1.2 From philosophy to logical semantics-------9 Pragmatic presupposition----- 13 2.1.3 Interpersonal value of the factive presupposition—18 2.1.3.1 2.1.3.2 Entity types------ 19 Interpersonal marking in complement clauses----- 23 2.1.3.2.1 2.1.3.2.2 Functional layers: grammatical restrictions on entity types—23 Functional layers: grammatical restrictions on factive complements----- 25 2.1.3.2.3 Asserted complement clauses and main clause phenomena — 27 2.1.4 The alternative approach: representational and interpersonal semantics----- 31 2.2 Factive complement clauses as nominalized clauses----- 33 2.2.1 Formal approaches----- 36 2.2.2 Cognitive-functional approaches---- 38 2.3 The matching problem: complement types and complement-taking 2.4 Aims----- 48 predicates----- 41 3 Representational semantics----- 49 3.1 Introduction----- 49 3.2 A three-way semantic classification----- 50 3.2.1 The semantic classification in simple clauses: creation and manipulation----- 50 3.2.1.1 Created vs. pre-existent objects-------50 3.2.1.2 Manipulated vs. unaffected pre-existent objects------ 51 3.2.1.3 The two parameters combined------52 3.2.2 The semantic classification of finite complement clauses----- 56 3.2.2.1 Created vs. pre-existent clauses------ 57
viii — Contents 3.2.2.2 3.2.2.3 3.2.3 3.2.3.1 3.2.3.2 3.2.3.2.1 3.2.3.2.2 3.2.3.2.3 3.3 Manipulated vs. unaffected clauses-----61 The two parameters combined-----64 Aspectual analysis----- 65 Theoretical prerequisites: situation types----- 68 Analysis----- 72 Reporting constructions-----72 Manipulative constructions-----76 Factive constructions------ 79 Conclusion-----84 4 4.1 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.3 4.4 Interpersonal semantics. Modality----- 89 Introduction-----89 Modality-----91 The interpersonal status of modal auxiliaries-----92 Modality as expressed by the indicative-----96 Speaker-related modal auxiliaries in complement clauses — 98 Modalized attestations of reporting, manipulative, and factive complement clauses-----108 4.4.1 Analysis of modal stance patterns: introduction-----108 4.4.2 Indirect speech or thought constructions--------116 4.4.3 Factive constructions-----120 4.4.3.1 Factive constructions with cognitive predicates----- 121 4.4.3.2 Factive constructions with emotive predicates----- 124 4.4.4 Manipulative constructions —128 4.5 Conclusion------ 133 5 Object extraposition —138 5.1 Introduction-----138 5.2 Theoretical background: factivity and/or givenness-----140 5.3 Methodology: data-----143 5.4 Object extraposition and givenness-----145 5.4.1 Referential givenness-----146 5.4.1.1 Discourse givenness------ 146 5.4.1.2 Hearer givenness------152 5.4.2 5.5 5.5.1 Relational givenness —155 Object extraposition and factivity-----156 Object extraposition: only in factive constructions?-----157 5.5.2 5.5.3 The grammar and form of extraposed object clauses—160
Discursive meaning: emphatic assertion--------165
Contents — ¡X 5.5.4 5.5.4.1 5.5.4.2 5.5.5 5.6 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.5 7 7.1 7.2 7.2.1 7.2.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.5.1 7.5.2 7.5.3 7.6 8 8.1 8.2 The aspectual construal induced by object extraposition---- 168 Factive constructions: aspectual construal by object extraposition---- 168 Manipulative constructions: aspectual construal by object extraposition---- 173 A constructional semantics for object extraposition: occurrential it---- 176 Conclusion------ 181 The diachrony of the fact that-clauses —184 Introduction---- 184 Methodology: data---- 186 Theoretical background-----188 The diachrony of the fact fhof-clauses---- 190 Contexts with restricted alternation —190 The matching problem: factive, manipulative, or reporting contexts---- 195 The semantic value of fact in Late Modern English: truth presupposition?---- 200 Conclusion----- 203 / regret (to say). From factive to reporting construction----- 205 Introduction---- 205 Theoretical background-----208 Parentheticals---- 208 The case of regret---- 209 Methodology: Corpora and data extraction-----210 A synchronic analysis: Discourse contexts for / regret (to say)---- 213 A diachronic analysis: the development of to-infinitives and reported speech patterns---- 219 Early Modern English---- 221 Late Modern English---- 226 Productivity of the diachronic development---- 230 Conclusion----- 232 Conclusions-----234 Summing up---- 234 Briefoutlook---- 237
X ------ Contents References----- 241 Index------ 251 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Gentens, Caroline |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1172242283 |
| author_facet | Gentens, Caroline |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gentens, Caroline |
| author_variant | c g cg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046774497 |
| classification_rvk | HF 290 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1164650461 (DE-599)BVBBV046774497 |
| discipline | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
| discipline_str_mv | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02883nam a2200493zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046774497</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200630 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200622s2020 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110666076</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-066607-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1164650461</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046774497</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HF 290</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)48837:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gentens, Caroline</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1172242283</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The factive-reported distinction in English</subfield><subfield code="c">Caroline Gentens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin ; Boston</subfield><subfield code="b">De Gruyter Mouton</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVII, 253 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 06. Apr 2020)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study offers a reconceptualization of the factive presupposition. It presents a cognitive-functional account based on three central features: the event structure of semantic classes of matrix predicates, the sources of modal stances in the complement clause, and the coercive potential of predicate-complement combinations. In this way the study complements the dominant formal pragmatic and formal syntactic theories on factivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">- complement clauses can be semantically unaffected, affected, or effected by the main clause situation - factive complements can contain speaker-related modal markings related to a variety of modal sources - predicate-complement combinations can induce constructional reinterpretations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Komplementierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4164879-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Faktivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4153599-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Englisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014777-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Englisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014777-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Faktivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4153599-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Komplementierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4164879-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-066969-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 342</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV000000738</subfield><subfield code="9">342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032183829&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032183829</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV046774497 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T14:47:51Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:53:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783110666076 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032183829 |
| oclc_num | 1164650461 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-11 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-11 DE-739 |
| physical | XVII, 253 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | De Gruyter Mouton |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] |
| series2 | Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] |
| spelling | Gentens, Caroline Verfasser (DE-588)1172242283 aut The factive-reported distinction in English Caroline Gentens Berlin ; Boston De Gruyter Mouton [2020] © 2020 XVII, 253 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] volume 342 Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 06. Apr 2020) This study offers a reconceptualization of the factive presupposition. It presents a cognitive-functional account based on three central features: the event structure of semantic classes of matrix predicates, the sources of modal stances in the complement clause, and the coercive potential of predicate-complement combinations. In this way the study complements the dominant formal pragmatic and formal syntactic theories on factivity In English - complement clauses can be semantically unaffected, affected, or effected by the main clause situation - factive complements can contain speaker-related modal markings related to a variety of modal sources - predicate-complement combinations can induce constructional reinterpretations Komplementierung (DE-588)4164879-1 gnd rswk-swf Faktivität (DE-588)4153599-6 gnd rswk-swf Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 gnd rswk-swf 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 s Faktivität (DE-588)4153599-6 s Komplementierung (DE-588)4164879-1 s 2\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-3-11-066969-5 Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] volume 342 (DE-604)BV000000738 342 Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032183829&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Gentens, Caroline The factive-reported distinction in English Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] - complement clauses can be semantically unaffected, affected, or effected by the main clause situation - factive complements can contain speaker-related modal markings related to a variety of modal sources - predicate-complement combinations can induce constructional reinterpretations Komplementierung (DE-588)4164879-1 gnd Faktivität (DE-588)4153599-6 gnd Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4164879-1 (DE-588)4153599-6 (DE-588)4014777-0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | The factive-reported distinction in English |
| title_auth | The factive-reported distinction in English |
| title_exact_search | The factive-reported distinction in English |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The factive-reported distinction in English |
| title_full | The factive-reported distinction in English Caroline Gentens |
| title_fullStr | The factive-reported distinction in English Caroline Gentens |
| title_full_unstemmed | The factive-reported distinction in English Caroline Gentens |
| title_short | The factive-reported distinction in English |
| title_sort | the factive reported distinction in english |
| topic | - complement clauses can be semantically unaffected, affected, or effected by the main clause situation - factive complements can contain speaker-related modal markings related to a variety of modal sources - predicate-complement combinations can induce constructional reinterpretations Komplementierung (DE-588)4164879-1 gnd Faktivität (DE-588)4153599-6 gnd Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | - complement clauses can be semantically unaffected, affected, or effected by the main clause situation - factive complements can contain speaker-related modal markings related to a variety of modal sources - predicate-complement combinations can induce constructional reinterpretations Komplementierung Faktivität Englisch Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032183829&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV000000738 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gentenscaroline thefactivereporteddistinctioninenglish |