Steadfast Democrats: how social forces shape Black political behavior
"Over the last half century, there has been a marked increase in ideological conservatism among African Americans, with nearly 50% of black Americans describing themselves as conservative in the 2000s, as compared to 10% in the 1970s. Support for redistributive initiatives has likewise declined...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton, New Jersey
Princeton University Press
[2020]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Princeton studies in political behavior
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "Over the last half century, there has been a marked increase in ideological conservatism among African Americans, with nearly 50% of black Americans describing themselves as conservative in the 2000s, as compared to 10% in the 1970s. Support for redistributive initiatives has likewise declined. And yet, even as black Americans shift rightward on ideological and issue positions, Democratic Party identification has stayed remarkable steady, holding at 80% to 90%. It is this puzzle that White and Laird look to address in this new book: Why has ideological change failed to push black Americans into the Republican party? Most explanations for homogeneity have focused on individual dispositions, including ideology and group identity. White and Laird acknowledge that these are important, but point out that such explanations fail to account for continued political unity even in the face of individual ideological change and of individual incentives to defect from this common group behavior. The authors offer instead, or in addition, a behavioral explanation, arguing that black Americans maintain political unity through the establishment and enforcement of well-defined group expectations of black political behavior through a process they term racialized social constraint. The authors explain how black political norms came about, and what these norms are, then show (with the help of survey data and lab-in-field experiments) how such norms are enforced, and where this enforcement happens (through a focus on black institutions). They conclude by exploring the implications of the theory for electoral strategy, as well as explaining how this framework can be used to understand other voter communities"-- |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical refernces and index |
Beschreibung: | xi, 233 Seiten Diagramme 25 cm |
ISBN: | 9780691199511 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046629786 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20200622 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 200316s2020 |||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780691199511 |c (hardback) |9 978-0-691-19951-1 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1155069430 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046629786 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-188 |a DE-12 |a DE-29 | ||
084 | |a 323.1196073 |2 23 | ||
100 | 1 | |a White, Ismail K. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)120995057X |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Steadfast Democrats |b how social forces shape Black political behavior |c Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton, New Jersey |b Princeton University Press |c [2020] | |
300 | |a xi, 233 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 25 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Princeton studies in political behavior | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical refernces and index | ||
505 | 8 | |a Black political decision making -- Norms of Black political behavior -- The political consequences of Black social networks -- The process of racialized social constraint -- Self-interest vs. group-interest and "racialized" social constraint -- Institutional constraints and the enforcement of racialized social pressure | |
520 | |a "Over the last half century, there has been a marked increase in ideological conservatism among African Americans, with nearly 50% of black Americans describing themselves as conservative in the 2000s, as compared to 10% in the 1970s. Support for redistributive initiatives has likewise declined. And yet, even as black Americans shift rightward on ideological and issue positions, Democratic Party identification has stayed remarkable steady, holding at 80% to 90%. It is this puzzle that White and Laird look to address in this new book: Why has ideological change failed to push black Americans into the Republican party? Most explanations for homogeneity have focused on individual dispositions, including ideology and group identity. White and Laird acknowledge that these are important, but point out that such explanations fail to account for continued political unity even in the face of individual ideological change and of individual incentives to defect from this common group behavior. The authors offer instead, or in addition, a behavioral explanation, arguing that black Americans maintain political unity through the establishment and enforcement of well-defined group expectations of black political behavior through a process they term racialized social constraint. The authors explain how black political norms came about, and what these norms are, then show (with the help of survey data and lab-in-field experiments) how such norms are enforced, and where this enforcement happens (through a focus on black institutions). They conclude by exploring the implications of the theory for electoral strategy, as well as explaining how this framework can be used to understand other voter communities"-- | ||
610 | 1 | 4 | |a Democratic Party (U.S.) |
610 | 1 | 7 | |a Democratic Party (U.S.) |2 fast |
650 | 4 | |a African Americans / Politics and government | |
650 | 4 | |a Party affiliation / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Group identity / Political aspects / United States | |
650 | 7 | |a African Americans / Politics and government |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Group identity / Political aspects |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Party affiliation |2 fast | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konservativismus |0 (DE-588)4032187-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Parteibindung |0 (DE-588)4584529-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schwarze |0 (DE-588)4116433-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schwarze |0 (DE-588)4116433-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Konservativismus |0 (DE-588)4032187-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Parteibindung |0 (DE-588)4584529-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Laird, Chryl Nicole |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)120995060X |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |a Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-691-20196-2 |w (DE-604)BV046669128 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032041347 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1810723892313980928 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | White, Ismail K. Laird, Chryl Nicole |
author_GND | (DE-588)120995057X (DE-588)120995060X |
author_facet | White, Ismail K. Laird, Chryl Nicole |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | White, Ismail K. |
author_variant | i k w ik ikw c n l cn cnl |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046629786 |
contents | Black political decision making -- Norms of Black political behavior -- The political consequences of Black social networks -- The process of racialized social constraint -- Self-interest vs. group-interest and "racialized" social constraint -- Institutional constraints and the enforcement of racialized social pressure |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1155069430 (DE-599)BVBBV046629786 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046629786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200622</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200316s2020 |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691199511</subfield><subfield code="c">(hardback)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-691-19951-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1155069430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046629786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">323.1196073</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">White, Ismail K.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)120995057X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Steadfast Democrats</subfield><subfield code="b">how social forces shape Black political behavior</subfield><subfield code="c">Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton, New Jersey</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xi, 233 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Princeton studies in political behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical refernces and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black political decision making -- Norms of Black political behavior -- The political consequences of Black social networks -- The process of racialized social constraint -- Self-interest vs. group-interest and "racialized" social constraint -- Institutional constraints and the enforcement of racialized social pressure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Over the last half century, there has been a marked increase in ideological conservatism among African Americans, with nearly 50% of black Americans describing themselves as conservative in the 2000s, as compared to 10% in the 1970s. Support for redistributive initiatives has likewise declined. And yet, even as black Americans shift rightward on ideological and issue positions, Democratic Party identification has stayed remarkable steady, holding at 80% to 90%. It is this puzzle that White and Laird look to address in this new book: Why has ideological change failed to push black Americans into the Republican party? Most explanations for homogeneity have focused on individual dispositions, including ideology and group identity. White and Laird acknowledge that these are important, but point out that such explanations fail to account for continued political unity even in the face of individual ideological change and of individual incentives to defect from this common group behavior. The authors offer instead, or in addition, a behavioral explanation, arguing that black Americans maintain political unity through the establishment and enforcement of well-defined group expectations of black political behavior through a process they term racialized social constraint. The authors explain how black political norms came about, and what these norms are, then show (with the help of survey data and lab-in-field experiments) how such norms are enforced, and where this enforcement happens (through a focus on black institutions). They conclude by exploring the implications of the theory for electoral strategy, as well as explaining how this framework can be used to understand other voter communities"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Democratic Party (U.S.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Democratic Party (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">African Americans / Politics and government</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Party affiliation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Group identity / Political aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">African Americans / Politics and government</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Group identity / Political aspects</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Party affiliation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konservativismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032187-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parteibindung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4584529-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schwarze</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116433-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schwarze</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116433-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Konservativismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032187-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Parteibindung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4584529-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laird, Chryl Nicole</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)120995060X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="a">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-691-20196-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV046669128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032041347</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | United States USA |
id | DE-604.BV046629786 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T14:10:32Z |
indexdate | 2024-09-20T14:01:09Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780691199511 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032041347 |
oclc_num | 1155069430 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-188 DE-12 DE-29 |
owner_facet | DE-188 DE-12 DE-29 |
physical | xi, 233 Seiten Diagramme 25 cm |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | Princeton University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Princeton studies in political behavior |
spelling | White, Ismail K. Verfasser (DE-588)120995057X aut Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University Press [2020] xi, 233 Seiten Diagramme 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Princeton studies in political behavior Includes bibliographical refernces and index Black political decision making -- Norms of Black political behavior -- The political consequences of Black social networks -- The process of racialized social constraint -- Self-interest vs. group-interest and "racialized" social constraint -- Institutional constraints and the enforcement of racialized social pressure "Over the last half century, there has been a marked increase in ideological conservatism among African Americans, with nearly 50% of black Americans describing themselves as conservative in the 2000s, as compared to 10% in the 1970s. Support for redistributive initiatives has likewise declined. And yet, even as black Americans shift rightward on ideological and issue positions, Democratic Party identification has stayed remarkable steady, holding at 80% to 90%. It is this puzzle that White and Laird look to address in this new book: Why has ideological change failed to push black Americans into the Republican party? Most explanations for homogeneity have focused on individual dispositions, including ideology and group identity. White and Laird acknowledge that these are important, but point out that such explanations fail to account for continued political unity even in the face of individual ideological change and of individual incentives to defect from this common group behavior. The authors offer instead, or in addition, a behavioral explanation, arguing that black Americans maintain political unity through the establishment and enforcement of well-defined group expectations of black political behavior through a process they term racialized social constraint. The authors explain how black political norms came about, and what these norms are, then show (with the help of survey data and lab-in-field experiments) how such norms are enforced, and where this enforcement happens (through a focus on black institutions). They conclude by exploring the implications of the theory for electoral strategy, as well as explaining how this framework can be used to understand other voter communities"-- Democratic Party (U.S.) Democratic Party (U.S.) fast African Americans / Politics and government Party affiliation / United States Group identity / Political aspects / United States African Americans / Politics and government fast Group identity / Political aspects fast Party affiliation fast Konservativismus (DE-588)4032187-3 gnd rswk-swf Parteibindung (DE-588)4584529-3 gnd rswk-swf Schwarze (DE-588)4116433-7 gnd rswk-swf United States fast USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Schwarze (DE-588)4116433-7 s Konservativismus (DE-588)4032187-3 s Parteibindung (DE-588)4584529-3 s DE-604 Laird, Chryl Nicole Verfasser (DE-588)120995060X aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-691-20196-2 (DE-604)BV046669128 |
spellingShingle | White, Ismail K. Laird, Chryl Nicole Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior Black political decision making -- Norms of Black political behavior -- The political consequences of Black social networks -- The process of racialized social constraint -- Self-interest vs. group-interest and "racialized" social constraint -- Institutional constraints and the enforcement of racialized social pressure Democratic Party (U.S.) Democratic Party (U.S.) fast African Americans / Politics and government Party affiliation / United States Group identity / Political aspects / United States African Americans / Politics and government fast Group identity / Political aspects fast Party affiliation fast Konservativismus (DE-588)4032187-3 gnd Parteibindung (DE-588)4584529-3 gnd Schwarze (DE-588)4116433-7 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4032187-3 (DE-588)4584529-3 (DE-588)4116433-7 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior |
title_auth | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior |
title_exact_search | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior |
title_exact_search_txtP | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior |
title_full | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird |
title_fullStr | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird |
title_full_unstemmed | Steadfast Democrats how social forces shape Black political behavior Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird |
title_short | Steadfast Democrats |
title_sort | steadfast democrats how social forces shape black political behavior |
title_sub | how social forces shape Black political behavior |
topic | Democratic Party (U.S.) Democratic Party (U.S.) fast African Americans / Politics and government Party affiliation / United States Group identity / Political aspects / United States African Americans / Politics and government fast Group identity / Political aspects fast Party affiliation fast Konservativismus (DE-588)4032187-3 gnd Parteibindung (DE-588)4584529-3 gnd Schwarze (DE-588)4116433-7 gnd |
topic_facet | Democratic Party (U.S.) African Americans / Politics and government Party affiliation / United States Group identity / Political aspects / United States Group identity / Political aspects Party affiliation Konservativismus Parteibindung Schwarze United States USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whiteismailk steadfastdemocratshowsocialforcesshapeblackpoliticalbehavior AT lairdchrylnicole steadfastdemocratshowsocialforcesshapeblackpoliticalbehavior |