Disputed decisions of World War II: decision science and game theory perspectives
"A former Harvard professor of decision science and game theory draws on those disciplines in this review of controversial strategic and tactical decisions of World War II. Allied leadership-although outstanding in many ways-sometimes botched what now is termed meta-decision making or deciding...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Jefferson, North Carolina
McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers
[2020]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "A former Harvard professor of decision science and game theory draws on those disciplines in this review of controversial strategic and tactical decisions of World War II. Allied leadership-although outstanding in many ways-sometimes botched what now is termed meta-decision making or deciding how to decide. Operation Jubilee, a single-division amphibious raid on Dieppe in August 1942, illustrates the pitfalls of groupthink. Prior to the invasion of North Africa in November, American and British leaders fell victim to the planning fallacy, going in with rosy expectations for easily achievable objectives. In the conquest of Sicily, they violated the millennia-old principle of command unity-now re-endorsed and elaborated on by modern theorists. Had Allied tacticians understood the game-theoretic significance of the terrain and conditions for success at Anzio, they might well not have and landed two-plus divisions there to fight a months-long stalemate in the first half of 1944." |
| Beschreibung: | x, 203 Seiten Karten |
| ISBN: | 9781476680040 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046576283 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200707 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200304s2020 |||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781476680040 |c pbk. |9 978-1-4766-8004-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1164626449 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046576283 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-11 |a DE-706 | ||
| 084 | |a HIST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a NQ 2570 |0 (DE-625)128287: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Thompson, Mark |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disputed decisions of World War II |b decision science and game theory perspectives |c Mark Thompson |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Disputed decisions of World War 2 |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Disputed decisions of World War Two |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Decision science and game theory perspectives |
| 246 | 1 | 0 | |a Decision science and game theory perspectives |
| 264 | 1 | |a Jefferson, North Carolina |b McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers |c [2020] | |
| 300 | |a x, 203 Seiten |b Karten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a "A former Harvard professor of decision science and game theory draws on those disciplines in this review of controversial strategic and tactical decisions of World War II. Allied leadership-although outstanding in many ways-sometimes botched what now is termed meta-decision making or deciding how to decide. Operation Jubilee, a single-division amphibious raid on Dieppe in August 1942, illustrates the pitfalls of groupthink. Prior to the invasion of North Africa in November, American and British leaders fell victim to the planning fallacy, going in with rosy expectations for easily achievable objectives. In the conquest of Sicily, they violated the millennia-old principle of command unity-now re-endorsed and elaborated on by modern theorists. Had Allied tacticians understood the game-theoretic significance of the terrain and conditions for success at Anzio, they might well not have and landed two-plus divisions there to fight a months-long stalemate in the first half of 1944." | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Zweiter Weltkrieg |0 (DE-588)4079167-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kriegführung |0 (DE-588)4073817-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4138606-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Taktik |0 (DE-588)4058940-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a World War, 1939-1945 / Political aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Game theory / Case studies | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Security, International / Case studies | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Zweiter Weltkrieg |0 (DE-588)4079167-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kriegführung |0 (DE-588)4073817-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Taktik |0 (DE-588)4058940-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Entscheidungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4138606-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031988142&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20200703 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031988142 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 355.009 |e 22/bsb |f 09044 |g 181 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181192959852544 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................vii Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Dieppe............................................................................................................................. 5 The Strategic Decision: Should Dieppe in August 1942 Have Been Raided? 5 · The Outcome: Minor Success; Profitless Movement; Major Disaster 13 · Later Decisions: Should Reserves Have Been Sent to Red and White Beaches—As Was Done? 15 · The Outcome: Wounding, Capture and Death 16 · Still Later Decision: Should the Operation Have Been Called Off—As It Was? 16 · The Outcome: The Return of Twelve Hundred; Crowing in Berlin 17 · How Bad Was the Outcome? How Significant the Battle? 17 · AnAlternativeApproachtoJudgingDecisions and Outcomes, That ofDecision Science 18 · Did the Lessons of Dieppe Make Its Outcome, on Net, Good? 19 · What Pluses, Other Than Its Lessons, Did Operation Jubilee Have ? 21 · Judging Decisions Apart from Outcomes 22 · Was Undertaking Jubilee a Good or a Bad Decision? 23 · How Much Did Ill Luck, Flawed Execution, or Poor Intelligence Contribute to the Bad Outcome? 25 · Given the Retrospective Consensus That the Plans for Operations Rutter and Jubilee Were Disastrous, Why Had They Been Approved? 28 · Could No One Have Prevented the Suicidal Folly? Did the Fault Lie in the Meta-Decisions—The Determinations of How the Decisions Would
Be Made? 31 · Meta-Decisional Issues: How Should GoNo-Go Determinations Be Made? How Were They Made on Dieppe? 34 · Did the British Authorize Rutter/Jubilee Expecting Failure—Perhaps Also Hoping for It and Even Acting to Sabotage the Raid? 35 · The Expected Value ofInformation 37 · What Should the Allies Have Done? 38 · Models of Governmental Decision-Making 38 · Conclusions 39 2. North Africa.......................................................................................................... 41 The Grand-Strategic Decision: Should the Allies in November 1942 Have Landed in North Africa? 41 · The Four Steps of Decision Science 49 · Competing Grand-Strategic Priorities 49 · Strategic Alternatives 51 · Tactical Choices 52 · Uncertainties 54 · Values: Anglo-American Differences in Outlook and Priority 57 · Modes of Decision Influence 59 · Roosevelt and Marshall 65 · The Outcome: Brief Opposition in Landing; Loss of the Race for Tunis; Capturing Thrice as Many Men as Had Been in the Afrika Korps 66 · The Sequence of Outcome Ratings for Torch: First Good; Then Bad; Ultimately, Better Than Good 72 · The Planning Fallacy 73 · Consequences of the Allied Failure to Take Tunis Quickly 75 · Was Undertaking Operation Gymnast/ TorchaGoodoraBadDecision? 75 · Was the Decision ofAdolfHitler to Send More Troops to Africa Good or Bad? 78 · Game Theory 80 · Other-Side Perception 81 · MoveOrder Plusses and Minuses 83 · Conclusions 84 3. Messina....................................................................................................................... 86 The Non-Decision: Should
the Allies in July and August of 1943 Have Acted, More Than They Negligibly Did, to Prevent the Escape of 53,000 Germans Across the Strait їх
x Contents of Messina? 87 · The Outcome: Allied Conquest of Sicily; German Escape; Italian Forsaking of the Axis Alliance 88 · How Good or Bad Was the Outcome of Operation Husky? 89 · Judgments on the Non-Decision of Failing to Interdict German Flight and Its Outcome 90 · What Affected How Bad or How Good the Outcome of Operation Husky Was? 91 · What Steps Might the Allies Have Taken to Have Captured or Killed Tens of Thousands More Germans in Sicily? 93 · Why Did the Allies in Sicily Not Take Any of Many Possible Decision Alternatives, Instead of Drifting into Their Actual, Inferior NonDecision? 97 · Who, If Anyone, Was at Fault? 99 · What Should the Allies Not Have Done? 100 · Principals and Agents; Unity of Command 102 · Why Did the Germans in Sicily Do Better Than the Allies? 108 · The Perspective of Game Theory 108 · Risk Aversion 109 · Organizational Behavior 109 · How Bad Were the Consequences of the Non-Decision at Messina? 110 · Conclusions 111 4. Anzio.......................................................................................................................... 113 The Strategic Decision: Should the Allies injanuary 1944 Have Landed at Anzio? 113 · The Operational Decision: Should Major General John Lucas, in His First Two Days Ashore, Have Pushed Boldly Forward—Which He Did Not Do? 118 · The Outcome: Stalemate at the Beachhead 120 · Did the Operational Decision of John Lucas Have a Good or a Bad Outcome? 122 · Was the Operational Decision of John Lucas Good or Bad? 123 · Did Operation Shingle Have a Good or a Bad Outcome? 125 · Deciding on Shingle 127
· Uncertainties 128 · Values 130 · Judgments of the Decision to Undertake Shingle 131 · Shingle as a Bluff 132 · Game-Theoretic Perspectives on Anzio 134 · Governmental Politics 134 · Conclusions 137 Epilogue: The Science ofDeciding, the Theory of Games and War...................................139 The Planning Fallacy 139 · Ways of Influencing and Resolving Decisions 139 · Public Opinion 143 · Weariness 145 · Age 148 · Decision Fatigue, Food and Sex 152 · Groupthink 153 · Expertise 157 · Numbers 159 · Principals, Agents, Asymmetric Information, Command Unity and Coalitions 162 · The Potential Value of Decision Science and Game Theory Between Dieppe and Anzio 165 · Better Decisions in Conflicts to Come 167 Chapter Notes.............................................................................................................................. 171 Bibliography................................................................................................................................ 191 Index............................................................................................................................................197
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Thompson, Mark |
| author_facet | Thompson, Mark |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Thompson, Mark |
| author_variant | m t mt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046576283 |
| classification_rvk | NQ 2570 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1164626449 (DE-599)BVBBV046576283 |
| discipline | Geschichte |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03245nam a2200541 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046576283</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200707 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200304s2020 |||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781476680040</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4766-8004-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1164626449</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046576283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HIST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NQ 2570</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)128287:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thompson, Mark</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Disputed decisions of World War II</subfield><subfield code="b">decision science and game theory perspectives</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark Thompson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Disputed decisions of World War 2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Disputed decisions of World War Two</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Decision science and game theory perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Decision science and game theory perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Jefferson, North Carolina</subfield><subfield code="b">McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">x, 203 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Karten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"A former Harvard professor of decision science and game theory draws on those disciplines in this review of controversial strategic and tactical decisions of World War II. Allied leadership-although outstanding in many ways-sometimes botched what now is termed meta-decision making or deciding how to decide. Operation Jubilee, a single-division amphibious raid on Dieppe in August 1942, illustrates the pitfalls of groupthink. Prior to the invasion of North Africa in November, American and British leaders fell victim to the planning fallacy, going in with rosy expectations for easily achievable objectives. In the conquest of Sicily, they violated the millennia-old principle of command unity-now re-endorsed and elaborated on by modern theorists. Had Allied tacticians understood the game-theoretic significance of the terrain and conditions for success at Anzio, they might well not have and landed two-plus divisions there to fight a months-long stalemate in the first half of 1944."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zweiter Weltkrieg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4079167-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kriegführung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073817-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138606-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Taktik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4058940-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">World War, 1939-1945 / Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Game theory / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Security, International / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zweiter Weltkrieg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4079167-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kriegführung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073817-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Taktik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4058940-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138606-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031988142&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20200703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031988142</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">355.009</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09044</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046576283 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:47:45Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781476680040 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031988142 |
| oclc_num | 1164626449 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-11 DE-706 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-11 DE-706 |
| physical | x, 203 Seiten Karten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20200703 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Thompson, Mark Verfasser aut Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives Mark Thompson Disputed decisions of World War 2 Disputed decisions of World War Two Decision science and game theory perspectives Jefferson, North Carolina McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers [2020] x, 203 Seiten Karten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "A former Harvard professor of decision science and game theory draws on those disciplines in this review of controversial strategic and tactical decisions of World War II. Allied leadership-although outstanding in many ways-sometimes botched what now is termed meta-decision making or deciding how to decide. Operation Jubilee, a single-division amphibious raid on Dieppe in August 1942, illustrates the pitfalls of groupthink. Prior to the invasion of North Africa in November, American and British leaders fell victim to the planning fallacy, going in with rosy expectations for easily achievable objectives. In the conquest of Sicily, they violated the millennia-old principle of command unity-now re-endorsed and elaborated on by modern theorists. Had Allied tacticians understood the game-theoretic significance of the terrain and conditions for success at Anzio, they might well not have and landed two-plus divisions there to fight a months-long stalemate in the first half of 1944." Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd rswk-swf Zweiter Weltkrieg (DE-588)4079167-1 gnd rswk-swf Kriegführung (DE-588)4073817-6 gnd rswk-swf Entscheidungstheorie (DE-588)4138606-1 gnd rswk-swf Taktik (DE-588)4058940-7 gnd rswk-swf World War, 1939-1945 / Political aspects Game theory / Case studies Security, International / Case studies Zweiter Weltkrieg (DE-588)4079167-1 s Kriegführung (DE-588)4073817-6 s Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 s Taktik (DE-588)4058940-7 s Entscheidungstheorie (DE-588)4138606-1 s DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031988142&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Thompson, Mark Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Zweiter Weltkrieg (DE-588)4079167-1 gnd Kriegführung (DE-588)4073817-6 gnd Entscheidungstheorie (DE-588)4138606-1 gnd Taktik (DE-588)4058940-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4057952-9 (DE-588)4079167-1 (DE-588)4073817-6 (DE-588)4138606-1 (DE-588)4058940-7 |
| title | Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives |
| title_alt | Disputed decisions of World War 2 Disputed decisions of World War Two Decision science and game theory perspectives |
| title_auth | Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives |
| title_exact_search | Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives |
| title_full | Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives Mark Thompson |
| title_fullStr | Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives Mark Thompson |
| title_full_unstemmed | Disputed decisions of World War II decision science and game theory perspectives Mark Thompson |
| title_short | Disputed decisions of World War II |
| title_sort | disputed decisions of world war ii decision science and game theory perspectives |
| title_sub | decision science and game theory perspectives |
| topic | Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Zweiter Weltkrieg (DE-588)4079167-1 gnd Kriegführung (DE-588)4073817-6 gnd Entscheidungstheorie (DE-588)4138606-1 gnd Taktik (DE-588)4058940-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Strategie Zweiter Weltkrieg Kriegführung Entscheidungstheorie Taktik |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031988142&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonmark disputeddecisionsofworldwariidecisionscienceandgametheoryperspectives AT thompsonmark disputeddecisionsofworldwar2 AT thompsonmark disputeddecisionsofworldwartwo AT thompsonmark decisionscienceandgametheoryperspectives |