Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | Undetermined |
Veröffentlicht: |
1995
|
Beschreibung: | 567-582 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046474660 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 200302s1995 |||| 00||| und d | ||
035 | |a (gbd)0182904 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046474660 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a und | |
100 | 1 | |a Verstegen, R. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
264 | 1 | |c 1995 | |
300 | |a 567-582 | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
688 | 7 | |a Römische Rechtsgeschichte |0 (DE-2581)TH000006715 |2 gbd | |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g pages:567-582 |
773 | 0 | 8 | |t Collatio iuris romani. 2 |d Amsterdam, 1995 |g 567-582 |k Studia Amstelodamensia ad epigraphicam, ius antiquum et papyrologicam pertinentia ; 35 B |w (DE-604)BV010636211 |
940 | 1 | |n gbd | |
940 | 1 | |q gbd_4_9609 | |
941 | |s 567-582 | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031886584 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1807591497109864448 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
article_link | (DE-604)BV010636211 |
author | Verstegen, R. |
author_facet | Verstegen, R. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Verstegen, R. |
author_variant | r v rv |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046474660 |
ctrlnum | (gbd)0182904 (DE-599)BVBBV046474660 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000naa a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046474660</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200302s1995 |||| 00||| und d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(gbd)0182904</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046474660</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">und</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Verstegen, R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">567-582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Römische Rechtsgeschichte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000006715</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">pages:567-582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Collatio iuris romani. 2</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">567-582</subfield><subfield code="k">Studia Amstelodamensia ad epigraphicam, ius antiquum et papyrologicam pertinentia ; 35 B</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV010636211</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_4_9609</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="s">567-582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031886584</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV046474660 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-08-17T00:13:05Z |
institution | BVB |
language | Undetermined |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031886584 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 567-582 |
psigel | gbd_4_9609 |
publishDate | 1995 |
publishDateSearch | 1995 |
publishDateSort | 1995 |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Verstegen, R. Verfasser aut Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex 1995 567-582 txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Römische Rechtsgeschichte (DE-2581)TH000006715 gbd pages:567-582 Collatio iuris romani. 2 Amsterdam, 1995 567-582 Studia Amstelodamensia ad epigraphicam, ius antiquum et papyrologicam pertinentia ; 35 B (DE-604)BV010636211 |
spellingShingle | Verstegen, R. Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_auth | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_exact_search | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_full | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_fullStr | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_full_unstemmed | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_short | Emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum: C 4,65,9, un exemple d'interpretatio duplex |
title_sort | emptori quidem fundi necesse non est stare colonum c 4 65 9 un exemple d interpretatio duplex |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verstegenr emptoriquidemfundinecessenoneststarecolonumc4659unexempledinterpretatioduplex |