Third-party effects of arbitral awards: res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Kluwer Law International
[2019]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International arbitration law library
volume 49 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Aus den Acknowledgements: "This monograph is an updated version of my doctoral dissertation submitted at Heidelberg University, Germany in July 2018." |
| Beschreibung: | xx, 368 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789403512730 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046357475 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230316 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 200128s2019 xx m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789403512730 |9 978-94-035-1273-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1159159430 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1669609812 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-739 |a DE-20 | ||
| 084 | |a INTRECHT |q DE-1a |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a PT 350 |0 (DE-625)139874: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1555 |0 (DE-625)139930: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 86.70 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 86.17 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pika, Maximilian |d 1989- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1128924900 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Third-party effects of arbitral awards |b res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects |c Maximilian Pika |
| 264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Kluwer Law International |c [2019] | |
| 300 | |a xx, 368 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a International arbitration law library |v volume 49 | |
| 500 | |a Aus den Acknowledgements: "This monograph is an updated version of my doctoral dissertation submitted at Heidelberg University, Germany in July 2018." | ||
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Universität Heidelberg |d 2018 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Dritter |0 (DE-588)4013019-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4132606-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schiedsspruch |0 (DE-588)4179542-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Schiedsspruch |0 (DE-588)4179542-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Dritter |0 (DE-588)4013019-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4132606-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 751 | |a Heidelberg |0 (DE-588)4023996-2 |2 gnd |4 uvp | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, PDF |z 978-94-035-1271-6 |
| 830 | 0 | |a International arbitration law library |v volume 49 |w (DE-604)BV021465758 |9 49 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031733834&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031733834 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1822589621455814656 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Table of Contents Foreword xiii List of Abbreviations xv Acknowledgements xix Introduction I The Privity of Arbitration as an Antonym to Multilateral Transactions II Examination Scope: Preclusive, Conclusive and Factual Third-Party Effects III Status Quo: Close to a Terra Incognita of International Arbitration Scholarship IV Argument and Agenda V Comparative Methodology 1 1 5 8 10 I The Dichotomy of Forum Coordination for Multilateral Transactions 13 2 Part Chapter 1 The Contractual Perception of Arbitral Jurisdiction as Trigger of Multi-Fora Disputes §1.01 Multi-Party Arbitration’s Obstacles [A] Necessary Consent to Arbitration: The Salient Discussion on Non-signatories [1] Standards under National Arbitration Laws [2] Applicable Law [B] Necessary Connection of Multiple Arbitration Agreements [C] Procedural Difficulties, Particularly in Appointing the Arbitrators §1.02 Multi-Fora Disputes as an Immanent Alternative [A] Content: Multi-Fora Disputes on the Substance and on Jurisdiction v 15 16 17 18 22 24 25 26 27
Table of Contents §1.03 §1.04 §1.05 §1.06 [B] Detriments Jurisdiction Undisputed: Party Autonomy as Barrier to Pre-emptive Coordination [A] Third-Party Notice and Third-Party Intervention [B] Parallel Arbitrations [1] Limited Potential for Consolidation Without Consent [2] Lis Pendens: Decline of Jurisdiction and Discretionary Stays [3] Appointment of Identical Arbitrators [C] Parallel Litigation and Arbitration Jurisdiction Disputed: Party Autonomy’s Susceptibility to Forum Coordination [A] Leitmotif of Vertical Jurisdictional Prerogatives in Domestic Settings [B] Horizontalization of Jurisdictional Prerogatives in International Settings Inference: Res Judicata’s Resulting Crossroads Position Concluding Theses 28 30 30 33 34 36 39 40 43 43 45 47 48 Chapter 2 A Proceduralist Connotation of Arbitral Res Judicata under National Laws §2.01 Foundations of Res Judicata in Civil Procedure [A] Judgments Within the Legal Order: Evidence, Substantive or Procedural Right? [B] Public and Private Interests Implemented by Res Judicata [C] Distinction and Interrelation Between Res Judicata and other Judgment Effects [D] Three Comparative Divides on the Operational Limits of Res Judicata §2.02 Res Judicata of Arbitral Awards at the Arbitral Seat [A] Arbitral Awards Within the Legal Order: Equivalent to Judgments? [B] Legal Consequences: Debate on Implemented Interests at Common Law [C] Requirements [1] Necessary Finality on the Merits [2] Res Judicata of Settlements: Consent Awards and Pure Settlements [3] Arbitral Res Judicata as a Dispositive Right to beInvoked [D] Seeking Relief from
Res Judicata §2.03 Res Judicata of Foreign Arbitral Awards [A] The NYC and the Applicable Law as Litmus Tests [B] Operative Characteristics of Cross-Border Res Judicata §2.04 Res Judicata Before Arbitral Tribunals: A Matter of Public Policy? §2.05 The Conflict of Decisions: Indispensable Annex to Res Judicata vi 49 50 51 53 54 55 61 61 64 67 67 69 71 72 74 75 75 78 81
Table of Contents [A] [B] [C] §2.06 §2.07 Case Scenarios, Conflict Criteria and Priority Criteria Widespread Application of Irreconcilability and Priority in Time Irreconcilability as an Implementation of Res Judicata’s Starting Point Inferences: A Proceduralist Framework of Forum Coordination Concluding Theses 82 83 86 89 89 Chapter 3 Judgments’ Third-Party Effects as a Shift of the Participatory Burden §3.01 Res Judicata’s Same-Parties Requirement [A] A Rule of Due Process [B] An Incentive for Multi-Party Litigation and Third-Party Notices §3.02 Erga Omnes Effects of Decisions [A] Adjudications on Legal Status: Res Judicata In Rem and Constitutive Effects [B] The French Doctrine of opposabilité [C] Participation Possibilities as Due-Process Assessments §3.03 Non-mutual Preclusions in Favour of Third Parties at Common Law §3.04 Turning Third Parties into Effective Parties: Privy Doctrines [A] Substitutions (Disclosed Representation and Succession) [B] Complex Substantive Relationships [C] Participation Possibilities as a Necessary Consequence of Preclusion Exposure §3.05 Functional Inferences [A] Res Judicata as a Shift of the Participatory Burden [B] Criteria for the Shift: Accessory to Substantive Law or Procedural Discretion? [C] Transferability of the Shift: The Emissive Constraints of Arbitral Jurisdiction §3.06 Concluding Theses 91 92 92 93 95 95 98 99 101 104 104 106 109 111 111 Ill 112 112 Part II A Reconciliatory Regime on Arbitral Awards’ Third-Party Effects 115 Chapter 4 Third-Party Effects of Arbitral Awards under National Arbitration Laws §4.01 Antagony of
Potential Legal Standards [A] Due Process as an Indication for Arbitral and Procedural Confluence [B] Conjecture: Party Autonomy as Additional Consideration in Arbitration §4.02 Preclusion Agreements in Multilateral Transactions §4.03 Erga Omnes Effects of Arbitral Awards [A] Arbitral Awards in Issues of Status [B] Opposabilité in French Arbitration Law VII 117 118 118 119 122 124 124 125
Table of Contents §4.04 §4.05 §4.06 §4.07 Arbitral Awards as Ground for Non-mutual Preclusion at Common Law Arbitral Awards’ Inter Partes Effects Towards Privies [A] Successions [1] Successions Occurring after an Arbitral Award Is Rendered [2] Successions Occurring During the Arbitration [B] Disclosed Representation and Class Arbitrations in Particular [C] Complex Substantive Relationships [1] Co-obligors [2] Collaterals, Suretyships and Guarantees [3] Third-Party Beneficiaries [4] Chains of Contracts [5] Insurances [6] Corporate Liability Functional Inferences [A] The Emerging Reconciliation of Arbitral Res Judicata and Jurisdiction [B] Irrelevance of Intervention Possibilities under Arbitral Rules? [C] Comparative Divides and Litmus Tests for Cross-Border Case Scenarios Concluding Theses 127 130 131 131 132 132 134 135 137 139 140 141 143 146 146 146 147 147 Chapter 5 Third-Party Effects of Arbitral Awards underthe NewYork Convention 149 §5.01 Status Quo of the Discussion on Res Judicata under the NYC 150 §5.02 Proposed Perspective on Res Judicata in General (Article IIINYC) 153 §5.03 Legal Standard for Third-Party Effects of Arbitral Awards Before Foreign Courts 158 [A] Infeasibility of Due Process for Uniform Standards (Article V(l)(b) NYC) 158 [B] The Case for a Uniform Jurisdictional Requirement (Article V(l)(a) NYC) 160 [1] Introduction of theHybridStandard 161 [2] The Conceptual Starting Point: Party Autonomy 164 [3] The Practical Target: Consistent Forum Coordination 166 [4] The Consequence: A Necessarily DifferentiatedRegime of Res Judicata 168 [C] Transfer of the
Established Argument to Non-mutual Preclusion 171 [1] Infeasibility of Article V(l)(b) NYC for UniformStandards 172 [2] Adjusted Rationales Favouring the Application of Article V(l)(a) NYC 173 [D] Irrelevance of More Liberal Lex Fori (Article VII NYC) 175 §5.04 Preclusion Agreements (Article 11(1) NYC) 177 [A] Multilateral Preclusion Agreements 177 vin
Table of Contents §5.05 [B] Bilateral Preclusion Anticipation: Lacuna of the NYC Concluding Theses 179 181 Chapter 6 Third-Party Effects of Arbitral Awards in Private International Law §6.01 Status Quo: The Law Applicable to Res Judicata as a Matter of Territoriality §6.02 Proposed Perspective: Between Conflictualist Methodologies and Pragmatism [A] Irrelevance of Article III NYC [B] Irrelevance of Territorialist Perceptions of International Arbitration [C] The Lex Fori as the Starting Point: From Legal Theory to Practical Feasibility [D] Practical Criteria for Determining the Law Applicable to Res Judicata §6.03 The Law Applicable to Foreign Arbitral Awards’ Third-Party Effects [A] Erga Omnes Effects: Cumulative Application of Arbitral Seat’s Law and Lex Fori [1] Legal Status [2] Opposabilité [B] Non-mutual Preclusion: Lex Fori [C] Privy Extensions in Substitutions: Lex Fori [D] Privy Extensions in Complex Substantive Relationships [1] The Lex Fori as the Starting Point for Discretionary Privy Assessments [2] The Implementation of Procedural Coherence: Foreign Law as Fact [3] A Substantive Characterization of Accessory Third-Party Effects? §6.04 Ancillary Matters of Particular Relevance to Third-Party Case Scenarios [A] Preclusion Agreements [B] Damages for Non-compliance with an Arbitral Award §6.05 Concluding Theses 183 184 188 189 190 191 193 194 195 195 197 198 198 199 200 202 203 206 206 207 208 Chapter 7 The Unshaped Factual Effect of Arbitral Awards §7.01 Gateways for Decisions’ Factual Effects in Comparative and Uniform Law §7.02 Status Quo: Limited Exploration of
Factual Effects in National Doctrine §7.03 Inferences from Other Norms’ Factual Effects [A] Judgments as Facts: Issues of Status as the Explored Point of Departure ix 211 212 215 216 217
Table of Contents [B] [C] [D] Foreign Judgments as Facts: Exposed to Recognition Review? Foreign Law as Facts: Exposed to Public-Policy Review Contracts as Facts: The Privity of Contract as a Threshold Matter §7.04 International Arbitral Awards’ Factual Effects and the Exposure to Article V NYC [A] Personal Jurisdiction as a Limit to Factual Effects [1] The Threshold for Applying Article V(l) (a) NYC [2] Admissibility of Factual Effects Re-examining the Arbitral Award [3] Admissibility of Factual Effects Preventing Absolute Irreconcilabilities [4] Admissibility of Factual Effects Implementing a Status Adjudication [B] Other Non-recognition Grounds as Limits to Factual Effects §7.05Arbitral Awards’ Factual Effects under National ArbitrationLaws [A] The Law Applicable to Arbitral Awards’ Factual Effects [B] Potential Considerations: Party Autonomy, Due Process and Irreconcilability §7.06 Concluding Theses 218 219 220 221 222 222 224 224 225 226 227 227 229 230 Chapter 8 Transnational Res Judicata and Third-Party Effects Before Arbitral Tribunals §8.01 Status Quo of the Discussion on Res Judicata Before Arbitral Tribunals [A] General Antagony Between Transnational and Conflictualist Approaches [1] Primary Perspective: Arbitral Jurisprudence and Scholarship [2] Secondary Perspective: Supervisory Courts [B] Transnational Divide on Issue Preclusion [C] Transnational Reluctance Towards Abuse of Process [D] Transnational Uncertainty on Res Judicata’s Requirements [E] Transnational Detection of Third-Party Effects [1] Res Judicata’s Same-Parties Requirement, Privies and Opposabilité
[2] The Proposal of Stavros L. Brekoulakis §8.02 Feasibility of Transnational Res Judicata [A] Res Judicata as a Restriction of an Arbitral Tribunal’s Obligation to Adjudicate [B] Limited Impact of Court Supervision at the Arbitral Seat [C] The Case for Transnational Principles Established Through Comparative Law x 233 234 234 235 238 239 241 243 244 244 247 249 250 250 253
Table of Contents [D] §8.03 §8.04 §8.05 The Threshold Between National and Transnational Case Scenarios 256 [E] Privity as an Obstacle to the Application of Investment Arbitration Principles 258 Transnational Principles on Decisions’ Third-Party Effects 261 [A] Res Judicata’s Same-Parties Requirement as a Transnational Principle 262 [B] The Test for Preclusive and Conclusive Effects Against Privies 263 [1] Priority of Preclusion Agreements 264 [2] Due Process’ High Threshold 266 [3] No Third-Party Effect Without Third-Party Jurisdiction 268 [4] Overriding Preclusion Consideration: The Non-sujet of Irreconcilability 269 [C] The Case Against Non-mutual Preclusion Before Arbitral Tribunals 271 [D] The Necessity to Refer to Prior Status Decisions 272 [E] The Factual Effect of Prior Decisions Before Arbitral Tribunals 273 [1] Functional Delineation Between Preclusive and Factual Effects 273 [2] Assessment of Due Process, Party Autonomy and Irreconcilability 274 [F] Preclusion Towards Joining Parties 275 [1] Successions During the Arbitration 275 [2] Joinders During the Arbitration in Complex Substantive Relationships 276 Illustration by Virtue of Specific Scenarios 277 [A] Successions 278 [B] Multiple Actions by Creditor Against Co-obligors 278 [C] Multiple Actions by Creditor Against Debtor and Surety/Guarantor 279 [D] Multiple Actions by Creditor Against Corporate Group Members 280 [E] Multiple Actions by Promisee and Third-Party Beneficiary Against Promisor 280 [F] Multiple Actions by Financial Leasee Against Supplier and Lessor 281 [G] Indemnification Amongst Connected
Debtors 281 [H] Indemnification in Insurance Case Scenarios 282 [I] The Introduction’s Case Example: Indemnification in Chains of Contracts 283 Concluding Principles for Third-Party Effects Before Arbitral Tribunals 284 Chapter 9 The Application of Res Judicata Principles to Jurisdictional Decisions §9.01 Conclusive Effects of Foreign Arbitration Judgments Before State Courts xi 287 288
Table of Contents [A] §9.02 §9.03 §9.04 Status Quo: Award Judgments’ Susceptibility to Foreign Judgment Principles [B] Pre-emptive Jurisdictional Decisions and Foreign Judgment Principles [C] Signatories to the Arbitration Agreement as Privies? Conclusive Effects of Arbitration Judgments Before Arbitral Tribunals [A] Status Quo: Jurisdictional Res Judicata and Competence-Competence [B] The Personal Nature of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Obligation to Adjudicate Conclusive Effects of Jurisdictional Decisions by Arbitral Tribunals Concluding Theses 288 294 295 296 296 298 298 299 Chapter 10 Conclusions §10.01 Observations on Arbitral Awards’ Third-Party Effects under National Laws §10.02 Proposals for International Arbitral Awards’ Third-Party Effects §10.03 Return on Practice: An Incentive Pre-emption of Jurisdictional Tactics §10.04 Return on Theory: A Manifestation of Arbitration’s Hybrid Design 301 302 303 304 Bibliography 307 Table of Cases 333 Table of Transnational Legislation 361 Index 365 xii 301 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Pika, Maximilian 1989- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1128924900 |
| author_facet | Pika, Maximilian 1989- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pika, Maximilian 1989- |
| author_variant | m p mp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046357475 |
| classification_rvk | PT 350 PU 1555 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1159159430 (DE-599)KXP1669609812 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046357475</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230316</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200128s2019 xx m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789403512730</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-035-1273-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1159159430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1669609812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-1a</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 350</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139874:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1555</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139930:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.17</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pika, Maximilian</subfield><subfield code="d">1989-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1128924900</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Third-party effects of arbitral awards</subfield><subfield code="b">res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects</subfield><subfield code="c">Maximilian Pika</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xx, 368 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International arbitration law library</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aus den Acknowledgements: "This monograph is an updated version of my doctoral dissertation submitted at Heidelberg University, Germany in July 2018."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Universität Heidelberg</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dritter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013019-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132606-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schiedsspruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4179542-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Schiedsspruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4179542-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Dritter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013019-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132606-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="751" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heidelberg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4023996-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="4">uvp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">978-94-035-1271-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International arbitration law library</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 49</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021465758</subfield><subfield code="9">49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031733834&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031733834</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV046357475 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-29T13:21:51Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789403512730 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031733834 |
| oclc_num | 1159159430 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-739 DE-20 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-739 DE-20 |
| physical | xx, 368 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law International |
| record_format | marc |
| series | International arbitration law library |
| series2 | International arbitration law library |
| spelling | Pika, Maximilian 1989- Verfasser (DE-588)1128924900 aut Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects Maximilian Pika Alphen aan den Rijn Kluwer Law International [2019] xx, 368 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier International arbitration law library volume 49 Aus den Acknowledgements: "This monograph is an updated version of my doctoral dissertation submitted at Heidelberg University, Germany in July 2018." Dissertation Universität Heidelberg 2018 Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd rswk-swf Dritter (DE-588)4013019-8 gnd rswk-swf Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132606-4 gnd rswk-swf Schiedsspruch (DE-588)4179542-8 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Schiedsspruch (DE-588)4179542-8 s Dritter (DE-588)4013019-8 s Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132606-4 s Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 s DE-604 Heidelberg (DE-588)4023996-2 gnd uvp Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 978-94-035-1271-6 International arbitration law library volume 49 (DE-604)BV021465758 49 Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031733834&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Pika, Maximilian 1989- Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects International arbitration law library Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd Dritter (DE-588)4013019-8 gnd Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132606-4 gnd Schiedsspruch (DE-588)4179542-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4162055-0 (DE-588)4013019-8 (DE-588)4132606-4 (DE-588)4179542-8 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects |
| title_auth | Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects |
| title_exact_search | Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects |
| title_full | Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects Maximilian Pika |
| title_fullStr | Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects Maximilian Pika |
| title_full_unstemmed | Third-party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects Maximilian Pika |
| title_short | Third-party effects of arbitral awards |
| title_sort | third party effects of arbitral awards res judicata against privies non mutual preclusion and factual effects |
| title_sub | res judicata against privies, non-mutual preclusion and factual effects |
| topic | Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd Dritter (DE-588)4013019-8 gnd Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132606-4 gnd Schiedsspruch (DE-588)4179542-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Dritter Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit Schiedsspruch Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031733834&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021465758 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pikamaximilian thirdpartyeffectsofarbitralawardsresjudicataagainstpriviesnonmutualpreclusionandfactualeffects |