How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law: why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
| ISSN: | 0001-2343 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046345768 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200121s2019 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046345768 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kirchmair, Lando |d 1986- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1123521395 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law |b why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails |c Lando Kirchmair |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:105 |g number:4 |g year:2019 |g pages:523-535 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Hrsg.: Internationale Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR) |d Stuttgart, 2019 |g 105, 4 (2019), 523-535 |w (DE-604)BV002527215 |x 0001-2343 |o (DE-600)496-0 |
| 940 | 1 | |n DHB | |
| 940 | 1 | |q DHB_BSB2 | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20200121 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031722355 | ||
| 941 | |b 105 |h 4 |j 2019 |s 523-535 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 509 |e 22/bsb |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804180848082157568 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV002527215 |
| author | Kirchmair, Lando 1986- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1123521395 |
| author_facet | Kirchmair, Lando 1986- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kirchmair, Lando 1986- |
| author_variant | l k lk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046345768 |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV046345768 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01205naa a2200313 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046345768</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200121s2019 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046345768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kirchmair, Lando</subfield><subfield code="d">1986-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1123521395</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law</subfield><subfield code="b">why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails</subfield><subfield code="c">Lando Kirchmair</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:105</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:523-535</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Hrsg.: Internationale Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR)</subfield><subfield code="d">Stuttgart, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">105, 4 (2019), 523-535</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002527215</subfield><subfield code="x">0001-2343</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)496-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">DHB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">DHB_BSB2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20200121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031722355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">105</subfield><subfield code="h">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="s">523-535</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">509</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046345768 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:42:16Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 0001-2343 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031722355 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| psigel | DHB_BSB2 BSB_NED_20200121 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kirchmair, Lando 1986- Verfasser (DE-588)1123521395 aut How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails Lando Kirchmair 2019 txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier volume:105 number:4 year:2019 pages:523-535 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Hrsg.: Internationale Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR) Stuttgart, 2019 105, 4 (2019), 523-535 (DE-604)BV002527215 0001-2343 (DE-600)496-0 |
| spellingShingle | Kirchmair, Lando 1986- How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails |
| title | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails |
| title_auth | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails |
| title_exact_search | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails |
| title_full | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails Lando Kirchmair |
| title_fullStr | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails Lando Kirchmair |
| title_full_unstemmed | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails Lando Kirchmair |
| title_short | How (not) to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law |
| title_sort | how not to argue for the relation between natural sciences and law why the thesis of an innate universal moral grammar and its relevance for law as argued by john mikhail fails |
| title_sub | why the thesis of an innate 'Universal Moral Grammar' and its relevance for law as argued by John Mikhail fails |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kirchmairlando hownottoarguefortherelationbetweennaturalsciencesandlawwhythethesisofaninnateuniversalmoralgrammaranditsrelevanceforlawasarguedbyjohnmikhailfails |