Self-defense, necessity, and punishment: a philosophical analysis
"This book offers a philosophical analysis of the moral and legal justifications for the use of force. While the book focuses on the ethics self-defense, it also explores its relation to lesser evil justifications, public authority, the justification of punishment, and the ethics of war. Steinh...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY ; London
Routledge
2020
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Routledge research in applied ethics
17 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "This book offers a philosophical analysis of the moral and legal justifications for the use of force. While the book focuses on the ethics self-defense, it also explores its relation to lesser evil justifications, public authority, the justification of punishment, and the ethics of war. Steinhoff's account of the moral use of force covers a wide range of topics, including the nature of justification in general, the precise elements of different justifications, the logic of claim- and liberty-rights and of rights forfeiture, the value of human life and its limits, and the princples of reciprocity and precaution. While the author's analysis is primarily philosophical, it is informed by a metaethical stance that also places heavy emphasis on existing law and legal scholarship. In doing so, the book appeals to widely shared moral intuitions, precepts, and concepts grounded in criminal law. Self-Defense, Necessity, and Punishment offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of the ethics of self-defense. It will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in applied ethics and moral philosophy, philosophy of law, and political philosophy"-- |
| Beschreibung: | xii, 369 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780367407216 0367407213 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046319027 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200210 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200103s2020 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780367407216 |c hardback |9 978-0-367-40721-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 0367407213 |c hardback |9 0-367-40721-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1140167562 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046319027 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Steinhoff, Uwe |d 1968- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)122702603 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Self-defense, necessity, and punishment |b a philosophical analysis |c Uwe Steinhoff |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York, NY ; London |b Routledge |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a xii, 369 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Routledge research in applied ethics |v 17 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "This book offers a philosophical analysis of the moral and legal justifications for the use of force. While the book focuses on the ethics self-defense, it also explores its relation to lesser evil justifications, public authority, the justification of punishment, and the ethics of war. Steinhoff's account of the moral use of force covers a wide range of topics, including the nature of justification in general, the precise elements of different justifications, the logic of claim- and liberty-rights and of rights forfeiture, the value of human life and its limits, and the princples of reciprocity and precaution. While the author's analysis is primarily philosophical, it is informed by a metaethical stance that also places heavy emphasis on existing law and legal scholarship. In doing so, the book appeals to widely shared moral intuitions, precepts, and concepts grounded in criminal law. Self-Defense, Necessity, and Punishment offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of the ethics of self-defense. It will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in applied ethics and moral philosophy, philosophy of law, and political philosophy"-- | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Selbstverteidigung |0 (DE-588)4054440-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a Self-defense / Moral and ethical aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Self-defense (Law) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Violence / Moral and ethical aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Punishment | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Punishment | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Self-defense (Law) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Self-defense / Moral and ethical aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Violence / Moral and ethical aspects | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Selbstverteidigung |0 (DE-588)4054440-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Online version |a Steinhoff, Uwe |t Self-defense, necessity, and punishment |b 1 |d New York : Taylor & Francis, 2019 |z 9780367814441 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Routledge research in applied ethics |v 17 |w (DE-604)BV043899641 |9 17 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031696079&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031696079 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804180799543574528 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Preface Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 1.1 Metaethical Disclosure 1 1.2 Methodology and the Moral Significance of Law and Common Sense 17 1.3 Overview 22 2 Self-Defense (Understood as Including Other-Defense): Foundations 2.1 What Is Self-Defense? 32 2.1.1 Defining “Self-Defense” 32 2.1.1.1 Self-Defense Is Directed against Attacks and Need Not Aim at Averting or Mitigating Harm 33 2.1.1.2 Although Self-Defense Is Directed against Attacks It Need Not Be Aimed at Averting or Mitigating Them 36 2.1.1.3 Actual Self-Defense Must and Can Nevertheless Be Distinguished from a Mere Attempt to Defend Oneself 40 2.1.1.4 Self-Defense Can Be Partially Punitive 42 2.1.1.5 Self-Defense Is Not Merely Accidental 44 2.1.1.6 Self-Defense Is Directed against Imminent or Ongoing Attacks 44 2.1.1.7 Practical Implications and the “Success Condition” 47 2.1.2 Normative Structure: Self-Defense as ClaimRight, Liberty, and Act-Specific Agent-Relative Prerogative 53 2.1.2.1 Rights Forfeiture Cannot Ground the SelfDefense Justification 54 2.1.2.2 A “Positive Right to Self-Defense” Cannot Ground the Self-Defense Justification Either 56 2.1.2.3 But a Right to Self-Defense Can Obviously Explain why Interference Would Wrong Us The Rights Forfeiture Approach Can’t 56
vi Contents 2.1.2.4 The Right to Self-Defense Is Basic, Fundamental, That Is, It Is Not Derived from Other Rights 57 2.1.2.5 Even the Conjunction of Rights Forfeiture and “Limiting Conditions” Cannot Explain Certain Features of the Self-Defense Justification 60 2.1.2.6 Self-Defense Is Also an Act-Specific AgentRelative Prerogative 61 2.1.2.7 Conclusion 64 2.2 The Scope and Limits of the Self-Defense Justification 64 2.2.1 A Deeper Look at the Shortcomings of Rights Forfeiture Theory and a First Look at the Alternative of Precautionary Rules 65 2.2.1.1 The Importance of the Distinction between Permissibility and Liability for the Limiting Conditions 68 2.2.1.2 Against Rights Forfeiture Theory: Forfeiture without Necessity and Instrumentality 77 2.2.1.3 An Alternative to Rights Forfeiture Theory: The Precautionary Rule Account 82 2.2.1.4 Conclusion 87 2.2.2 The Necessity Requirement 88 2.2.2.1 Necessity and Rights Forfeiture: Reciprocity, Reason-Independence, and the “Wide Account” 89 2.2.2.2 Reminder: Necessity and Justification 95 2.2.2.3 For a Harsh Necessity Condition 96 2.2.2.4 Against the Formulaic Interpretation of the Necessity Condition and for Reasonableness 100 2.2.2.5 Conclusion 103 2.2.3 The Imminence Requirement 104 2.2.3.1 Self-Defense vs. Justifying Emergency 105 2.2.3.2 What Counter-Arguments Would Have to Show 107 2.2.3.3 The Home Invasion and “Kill You Tomorrow” Argument 108 2.2.3.4 The “Imminence Is a Proxy for Necessity” Argument 110 2.2.3.5 Christopher’s Puzzles 111 2.2.3.6 McMahan’s Liability Argument 115 2.23.7 Changing Direction: Imminence Triggers
the Self-Defense Justification and Its Harsh (on the Aggressor) Necessity Criterion 118 2.2.3.8 The Rationale of the Imminence Requirement 123 2.2.3.9 Exceptional Cases and Different Justifications 127 2.2.3.10 Conclusion 129 2.2.4 The Proportionality Requirement 129 2.2.4.1 2.2.4.2 2.2.4.3 2.2.4.4 2.2.4.5 Proportionality and the Value of Life 132 Quong’s “Stringency Principle” 143 Proportionality and the Rights of the Aggressor 148 Proportionality as Precautionary Rule 157 Conclusion 159
Contents vii 2.2.5 The Subjective Element of Justified SelfDefense: The Knowledge Requirement 159 2.2.5.1 Is Moral Obligation Objective or Subjective? 161 2.2.5.2 The Curious Case of the “Unknowingly ‘Justified’ Defender” 166 2.2.5.2.1 The Invocation of Attempt Liability 168 2.2.5.2.2 How the Purely Objectivist Account Makes Justified Self-Defense Practically Impossible 174 2.2.5.2.3 Does a Reasonability Requirement Pit into an Objectivist Account? 181 2.2.5.3 Morality and Proper Action-Guidance 187 2.2.5.4 The Form of the Subjective Element 190 2.2.5.5 Conclusion 197 3 Self-Defense: Special Cases (Innocent Attackers, Justified Attackers, and Non-Responsible Threats) 3.1 Justifying Defense against Non-Responsible Threats and Justified Aggressors: The Liability vs. the Rights-Infringement Account 228 3.1.1 The Liability Account 228 3.1.2 Quong on Self-Preference, Justified RightsInfringement, and Liability 231 3.1.3 Frowe on the Tactical Bomber and Compensation without Liability 241 3.1.4 Conclusion 245 3.2 But Is Defense against Non-Responsible Threats Really Justified? 245 3.3 The Liability of Justified Attackers and the Permissibility of Counter-Attacking Them 249 3.3.1 Against McMahan (“Justification Defeats Liability”) 249 3.3.1.1 McMahan’s Argument 249 3.3.1.2 Who Has a Right to Self-Defense - The Justified Bombers or the Innocent Civilians? 251 3.3.1.3 Do Neutral Third Parties Have a “LiabilityJustification” to Kill the Justified Bombers? 257 3.3.1.4 What Really Matters: On Permissibly Resisting Justified Bombers and Impermissibly Resisting (Certain) Unjustified and
Liable Thieves 259 3.3.1.5 Who “Should” Compensate? - And Why That Does Not Matter 262 3.3.1.6 Why McMahan’s Responsibility Account Is Also Too Permissive 265 3.3.1.7 Conclusion 266 3.3.2 Against Tadros (“Conflicts Should Normally Be Rejected”) 267 226
viii 4 5 Contents Emergency Justifications (Including Necessity and Lesser Evil) 4.1 The Basic Idea and the Basic Elements of Emergency Justifications 285 4.2 Variations, Concretizations, and the Interpretation of “Danger 289 4.3 Lesser Evil Justifications Do Not Amount to Obligations nor Do They Provide Moral Immunity from Defensive Counter-Measures: On Frowe’s Most Recent Claims to the Contrary 306 4.3.1 Frowe’s “Requirement Thesis” and Its Shortcomings 306 4.3.2 Frowe’s Unwarranted Claims Concerning the Impermissibility of Defense against “Lesser Evil Harms” 311 Punishment and the Public Authority Justification 5.1 What Is Punishment? 319 5.2 Justifying Punishment 321 5.2.1 Individual Acts of Punishment Inflicted on Culpable Offenders 321 5.2.2 The General Practice of Punishment: What Justifies State Punishment, and Does the State Have an Exclusive Right to Punish? 323 285 319 5.2.2.1 Wellman on the State’s (Exclusive) Right to Punish 324 5.2.2.1.1 The “Consequential” Rationale for the Alleged Exclusivity of State Punishment 325 5.2.2.1.2 The Limits of “Consequential ConsiderationsRights, Liberties, and Permissions 329 5.2.2.1.3 A Proviso and Clarification 337 5.3 The Public Authority Justification 338 Concluding Remarks 346 References Index 349 363
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Steinhoff, Uwe 1968- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)122702603 |
| author_facet | Steinhoff, Uwe 1968- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Steinhoff, Uwe 1968- |
| author_variant | u s us |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046319027 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1140167562 (DE-599)BVBBV046319027 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03180nam a2200481 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046319027</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200210 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200103s2020 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780367407216</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-367-40721-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0367407213</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">0-367-40721-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1140167562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046319027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steinhoff, Uwe</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)122702603</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Self-defense, necessity, and punishment</subfield><subfield code="b">a philosophical analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">Uwe Steinhoff</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY ; London</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 369 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge research in applied ethics</subfield><subfield code="v">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book offers a philosophical analysis of the moral and legal justifications for the use of force. While the book focuses on the ethics self-defense, it also explores its relation to lesser evil justifications, public authority, the justification of punishment, and the ethics of war. Steinhoff's account of the moral use of force covers a wide range of topics, including the nature of justification in general, the precise elements of different justifications, the logic of claim- and liberty-rights and of rights forfeiture, the value of human life and its limits, and the princples of reciprocity and precaution. While the author's analysis is primarily philosophical, it is informed by a metaethical stance that also places heavy emphasis on existing law and legal scholarship. In doing so, the book appeals to widely shared moral intuitions, precepts, and concepts grounded in criminal law. Self-Defense, Necessity, and Punishment offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of the ethics of self-defense. It will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in applied ethics and moral philosophy, philosophy of law, and political philosophy"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Selbstverteidigung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054440-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Self-defense / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Self-defense (Law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Violence / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Punishment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Punishment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Self-defense (Law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Self-defense / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Violence / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selbstverteidigung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054440-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Online version</subfield><subfield code="a">Steinhoff, Uwe</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-defense, necessity, and punishment</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Taylor & Francis, 2019</subfield><subfield code="z">9780367814441</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Routledge research in applied ethics</subfield><subfield code="v">17</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV043899641</subfield><subfield code="9">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031696079&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031696079</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046319027 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:41:30Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780367407216 0367407213 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031696079 |
| oclc_num | 1140167562 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | xii, 369 Seiten 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Routledge research in applied ethics |
| series2 | Routledge research in applied ethics |
| spelling | Steinhoff, Uwe 1968- Verfasser (DE-588)122702603 aut Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis Uwe Steinhoff New York, NY ; London Routledge 2020 xii, 369 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Routledge research in applied ethics 17 "This book offers a philosophical analysis of the moral and legal justifications for the use of force. While the book focuses on the ethics self-defense, it also explores its relation to lesser evil justifications, public authority, the justification of punishment, and the ethics of war. Steinhoff's account of the moral use of force covers a wide range of topics, including the nature of justification in general, the precise elements of different justifications, the logic of claim- and liberty-rights and of rights forfeiture, the value of human life and its limits, and the princples of reciprocity and precaution. While the author's analysis is primarily philosophical, it is informed by a metaethical stance that also places heavy emphasis on existing law and legal scholarship. In doing so, the book appeals to widely shared moral intuitions, precepts, and concepts grounded in criminal law. Self-Defense, Necessity, and Punishment offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of the ethics of self-defense. It will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in applied ethics and moral philosophy, philosophy of law, and political philosophy"-- Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf Selbstverteidigung (DE-588)4054440-0 gnd rswk-swf Self-defense / Moral and ethical aspects Self-defense (Law) Violence / Moral and ethical aspects Punishment Selbstverteidigung (DE-588)4054440-0 s Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s DE-604 Online version Steinhoff, Uwe Self-defense, necessity, and punishment 1 New York : Taylor & Francis, 2019 9780367814441 Routledge research in applied ethics 17 (DE-604)BV043899641 17 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031696079&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Steinhoff, Uwe 1968- Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis Routledge research in applied ethics Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Selbstverteidigung (DE-588)4054440-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4015602-3 (DE-588)4054440-0 |
| title | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis |
| title_auth | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis |
| title_exact_search | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis |
| title_full | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis Uwe Steinhoff |
| title_fullStr | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis Uwe Steinhoff |
| title_full_unstemmed | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment a philosophical analysis Uwe Steinhoff |
| title_short | Self-defense, necessity, and punishment |
| title_sort | self defense necessity and punishment a philosophical analysis |
| title_sub | a philosophical analysis |
| topic | Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Selbstverteidigung (DE-588)4054440-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Ethik Selbstverteidigung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031696079&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV043899641 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT steinhoffuwe selfdefensenecessityandpunishmentaphilosophicalanalysis |