Cultura comunicării politice în România: o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014)
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Romanian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bucureşti
Pro Universitaria
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Ştiinţe politice
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 269 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9786062609160 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046184507 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191106 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 191004s2018 a||| |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9786062609160 |9 978-606-26-0916-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1122738344 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046184507 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1196379297 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cultura comunicării politice în România |b o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) |c Nicolae-Sorin Drăgan |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Pro Universitaria |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 269 Seiten |b Illustrationen, Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Ştiinţe politice | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 2002-2014 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Präsident |0 (DE-588)4115611-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Debatte |0 (DE-588)4148952-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kommunikation |0 (DE-588)4031883-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kommunikation |0 (DE-588)4031883-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Präsident |0 (DE-588)4115611-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Debatte |0 (DE-588)4148952-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Geschichte 2002-2014 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20191106 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031563989 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 498 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804180552726609920 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CUPRINS Lista Figurilor............................................................................................. 9 Lista Tabelelor..................................................................................................................... 11 Introducere............................................................................................................................17 PARTEA I CADRUL TEORETIC PENTRU STUDIUL DEZBATERII POLITICE TELEVIZATE..................................................................................................................... 23 CAPITOLUL 1 DE LA DEZBATERE LA DIALOG. DEZBATEREA POLITICĂ TELEVIZATĂ, PRACTICĂ DE COMUNICARE ESENŢIALĂ ÎN CULTURA POLITICĂ ŞI MEDIATICA A UNEI ŢĂRI...................................... 25 1.1. Dezbaterea politică televizată. Aspecte generale................................................. 25 1.1.1. Dezbaterea politică televizată, un gen televizual eterogen...........................26 1.1.2. Dimensiunea generativă a dezbaterii politice televizate...............................31 1.1.3. Dezbaterea politică televizată ca practică de comunicare în cultura politico-mediatică..........................................................................................36 1.2. Modele de cercetare. Abordări conceptuale în cercetarea dezbaterii televizate........................................................................................................ 43 1.2.1. Modele normative...........................................................................................43 1.2.2. Modele
operaţionale...................................................................................... 46 1.3. Efectele dezbaterilor televizate............................................................................. 51 CAPITOLUL 2 TEORIA FUNCŢIONALĂ A DISCURSULUI POLITIC....................................... 57 2.1. Axiomele teoriei funcţionale................................................................................ 58 2.2. Funcţiile discursului în teoria funcţională............................................................62 2.2.1. Enunţuri care vizează auto-valorizarea candidatului (aclamaţii)................. 62 2.2.2. Enunţuri de tip ofensiv (atacuri)....................................................................63 2.2.3. Enunţuri de tip defensiv (apărări)..................................................................66 2.2.4. „Preferabilitatea aparentă” şi „potenţialul de persuasiune” al funcţiilor discursive...................................................................................... 67 2.3. Predicţii şi/sau ipoteze de cercetare asociate teoriei funcţionale.........................69 5
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGA N CAPITOLUL З TEORIA FUNCŢIONALĂ ŞI MODELELE DE COMUNICARE INTERCULTURALĂ.................................................................................................... 73 3.1. Teoria culturilor de context înalt (high culture) / scăzut (low culture).............. 75 3.2. Modelul categoriilor culturale de comunicare.................................................... 77 CAPITOLUL 4 DE LA SEMIOTICA TRADIŢIONALĂ LA SEMIOTICA SOCIALĂ................79 4.1. Semiotică şi Comunicare.......................................................................................79 4.2. Elemente de Semiotică Socială............................................................................. 81 4.2.1. Natura „multimodală” a comunicării umane............................................... 83 4.2.2. Resurse semiotice şi/sau moduri comunicaţionale...................................... 85 4.2.3. Text multimodal. Potenţialul semiotic al textelor multimodale................. 87 4.3. Forme şi funcţii ale gesturilor.............................................................................. 88 4.3.1. Gesturi cu funcţie pragmatică........................................................................ 89 4.3.2. Relaţia dintre gesturi şi orientarea ideologică a actorilor politici............... 92 4.3.3. Alte funcţii ale gesturilor............................................................................... 94 PARTEA A II-A ANALIZA FUNCŢIONAL-SEMIOTICĂ A DEZBATERILOR TELEVIZATE PENTRU ALEGERILE PREZIDENŢIALE DIN ROMÂNIA (2004-2014)............. 97 CAPITOLUL 5 ANALIZA
FUNCŢIONALĂ A DEZBATERILOR PREZIDENŢIALE DIN NOIEMBRIE 2014, DECEMBRIE 2009 ŞI DECEMBRIE 2004.............................99 5.1. Metodologia cercetării...........................................................................................99 5.2. Analiza funcţională a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din noiembrie 2014............. 103 5.2.1. Elemente ale contextului politic.................................................................. 103 5.2.2. Corpusul analizei.......................................................................................... 104 5.2.3. Rezultatele cercetării....................................................................................105 5.2.3.1. Testarea predicţiilor teoriei funcţionale pentru dezbaterile din noiembrie 2014....................................................................................105 5.2.3.2. Analiza distribuţiei funcţiilor discursive pe pachete tematice........... 111 5.2.4. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor............................................................. 118 5.2.4.1. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor obţinute prin testarea predicţiilor teoriei funcţionale pentru dezbaterile din noiembrie 2014.............................. 118 5.2.4.2. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor obţinute din analiza distribuţiei funcţiilor discursive pe pachete tematice pentru dezbaterile din noiembrie 2014........................................................... 122 5.2.4.3. Strategiile discursive ale candidaţilor din perspectiva „teoriei atacurilor
persuasive”......................................................................... 124 5.2.5. Limitele cercetării.........................................................................................127 5՜.3. Analiza funcţională a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din decembrie 2009............. 131 5.3.1. Elemente ale contextului politic.................................................................. 131 6
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 5.3.2. Corpusul analizei..........................................................................................133 5.3.3. Rezultatele cercetării................................................................................... 133 5.3.3.1. Testarea predicţiilor teoriei funcţionale pentru dezbaterea din decembrie 2009................................................................................... 133 5.3.3.2. Analiza distribuţiei funcţiilor discursive pe pachete tematice........... 136 5.3.4. Analiza rezultatelor cercetării...................................................................... 138 5.3.4.1. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor obţinute prin testarea predicţiilor teoriei funcţionale pentru dezbaterea din decembrie 2009.’.......................... .’....................................................................... 138 5.3.4.2. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor obţinute din analiza distribuţiei funcţiilor discursive pe pachete tematice pentru dezbaterea din decembrie 2009..........................................................140 5.4. Analiza funcţională a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din decembrie 2004............. 141 5.4.1. Elemente ale contextului politic..................................................................141 5.4.2. Corpusul analizei.......................................................................................... 142 5.4.3. Rezultatele cercetării....................................................................................143 5.4.3.1. Testarea predicţiilor teoriei
funcţionale pentru dezbaterea din decembrie 2004....................................................................................143 5.4.3.2. Analiza distribuţiei funcţiilor discursive pe pachete tematice........... 145 5.4.4. Analiza rezultatelor cercetării...................................................................... 148 5.4.4.1. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor obţinute prin testarea predicţiilor teoriei funcţionale pentru dezbaterea din decembrie 2004.’.......................... .’....................................................................... 148 5.4.4.2. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor obţinute din analiza distribuţiei funcţiilor discursive pe pachete tematice pentru dezbaterea din decembrie 2004..........................................................149 5.5. Concluzii............................................................................................................... 150 CAPITOLUL 6 ANALIZA COMPARATIVĂ A REZULTATELOR OBŢINUTE ÎN CONTEXTUL COMUNICĂRII POLITICE DIN ROMANIA vs. ALTE CONTEXTE CULTURALE........................................................................................ 155 6.1. Distribuţia tipurilor de aserţiuni şi a frecvenţelor pentru temele generale (Politici, Caracter) în contexte culturale diferite de comunicare politică.......................................................................................................... 158 6.2. Analiza funcţională a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) din perspectiva modelelor de comunicare interculturală............................161 6.2.1. Scenariu
de interpretare a rezultatelor construit pe baza modelului culturilor de context înalt (high culture) / scăzut (lowculture)................162 6.2.2. Scenariu de interpretare a rezultatelor construit pe baza modelului categoriilor culturale de comunicare..........................................................163 6.3. Limitele cercetării.................................................................................................164 6.4. Concluzii............................................................................................................... 164 7
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN CAPITOLUL 7 ANALIZA MULTIMOD ALA A DEZBATERILOR PREZIDENŢIALE DIN ROMÂNIA (2004-2014)..............................................................!......................167 7.1. Metodologia de cercetare.................................................................................... 167 7.1.1. Stabilirea corpusului.................................................................................... 168 7.1.2. Instrumente de lucru. Softul ELAN (EudicoLinguistic Annotator).......... 170 7.1.3. Taxonomia gesturilor, semnificaţiirelaţionale ale gesturilor......................173 7.2. Rezultatele cercetării.......................................................................................... 177 7.3. Analiza şi interpretarea rezultatelor....................................................................190 7.4. Concluzii.............................................................................................................. 207 CAPITOLUL 8 CONCLUZII ֊ O PERSPECTIVĂ FUNCŢIONAL-SEMIOTICĂ ASUPRA DEZBATERILOR PREZIDENŢIALE DIN ROMÂNIA (2004-2014)................. 211 REFERINŢE BIBLIOGRAFICE.................................................................................. 219 ANEXE...............................................................................................................................237 8
REFERINŢE BIBLIOGRAFICE 1. Allwood, J., Cercato, L., Jokinen, K., Navarcetta, C., Paggio, P., (2007), The MUMIN Coding Scheme for the Annotation of Feedback, Turn Management and Sequencing Phenomena. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(3/4), 273-287. 2. Almond, G.A, Powell Jr., G.B., (1966), Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 3. Almond, G.A., Verba. S., (1963), The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press (reprint 1989. Newbury Park, CA: Sage), 4. Amey, P., (2009), La parole à la télévision. Les dispositifs des talk-shows. Paris: L Harmattan. 5. Amey, P., Leroux, P., (2012), Interviews, débats et divertissements politiques, L échange politique à la télévision. Paris: L Harmattan. 6. André, E., Bevacqua, E., Heylen, D., Niewiadomski, R., Pelachaud, C., Peters, C., Rehm, M., (2011), Nonverbal Persuasion and Communication in an Affective Agent. In P. Petta, C. Pelachaud, R. Cowie (Eds.), Emotion-Oriented Systems: The Humaine Handbook (pp. 585-608), 7. Annenberg Debate Reform Working Group., (2015, June 17), Democratizing The Debates. A Report of the Annenberg Working Group on Presidential Campaign Debate Reform. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Disponibil la: https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/democratizing-thedebates/. 8. Auer, J.J., (1962), The Counterfeit Debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The Great Debates: Background, Perspective, Effects (pp. 142-150), Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 9. Auer, J.J., (1981), Great
Myths About Great Debates. In K.W. Ritter (Ed.), Speaker and Gavel, 18(2), 14-21. 10. Bakhtin, M.M., (1963/1970), Problemele poeticii lui Dostoïevski (trad. de S. Recevschi), Bucureşti: Editura Univers. 11. Barthes, R., (1964/1977), Rhetoric of the Image. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, Music, Text (pp. 32-51), New York: Hill and Wang 12. Barthes, R., (1964/1987), Eseuri Critice. Romanul scriiturii (traducere de Adriana Babeţi şi Delia Şepeţean-Vasiliu), Bucureşti: Editura Univers. 13. Barthes, R., (1997 /1987/ [1973 /1957/]), Mitologii (trad. Maria Carpov), Iaşi: Institutul European. 14. Beciu, C., (2006), Alegerile 2004: calitatea deliberativă a emisiunilor electorale. Revista română de comunicare şi relaţii publice (Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations), 8, 59-72. 15. Beciu, C., (2009), Comunicare şi discurs mediatic. O lectură sociologică. Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro. 16. Beciu, C., (2010), New media şi reconfigurarea sferei televizuale. Construcţia mediática a publicului activ. Revista Română de Sociologie, serie nouă, anul XXI, nr. 5-6, 468^190. 17. Beciu, C., (2015), Dezbaterile Electorale şi Rolul Mediei în Campania Prezidenţială 2014 din România. Revista Română De Sociologie, 26(3), 253-278. 219
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. Benoit, W.L., (2000), Let’s put „debate” into presidential debates. Rostrum, 74(9), 21-24. Benoit, W.L., (2007a), Determinants of Defense in Presidential Debates. Communication Research Reports, 24(4), 319-325. Benoit, W.L., (2007b), Communication in political campaigns. New York, NY: Peter Lang. Benoit, W.L., (2011a), A functional analysis of the 2011 English language Canadian Prime Minister debates. Contemporary Argumentation Debate, 32, 45-69. Benoit, W.L., (2011b), Content Analysis in Political Communication. In E. P. Buey, R. L. Holbert (Eds.), The Source Book for Political Communication Research. Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques (pp. 268-279), New York and London: Taylor Francis Group. Benoit, W.L., (2014), Political Election Debates: Informing Voters about Policy and Character. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Benoit, W.L., (2016a), A Functional Analysis of the 2012 London Mayor Debate. J Mass Communicat Journalism, 6(2), 1-6. Benoit, W.L., (Ed.), (2016b), Handbook ofpolitical campaigning in the United States. New York: Praeger. Benoit, W.L., (2017a), A Functional Analysis of 2016 Direct Mail Advertising in Ohio. American Behavioral Scientist, 1-12. Benoit, W.L., (2017b), Criticism of Actions and Character: Strategies for Persuasive Attack Extended. Relevant Rhetoric: A New Journal ofRhetorical Studies, 8, 1-17. Benoit, W.L., (2017c), The Functional Theory of Political Campaigns. In K. Kenski, K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political
Communication (pp. 195-204), New York: Oxford University Press. Benoit, W.L., (2017d), The Functional Theory of political campaign discourse. In Robert E. Denton (Ed.), Political Campaign Communication: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 3-32), Lanham, MD: Lexington Press. Benoit, W.L., Wells, W.T., (1996), Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press. Benoit, W.L., Dorries, D.B., (1996), Dateline NBC’s persuasive attack on Wal-Mart. Communication Quarterly, 44(4), 463-477. Benoit, W.L., McKinney, M.S., Holbert, R.L., (2001), Beyond learning and persona: Extending the scope of presidential debate effects. Communication Monographs, 68, 259-273. Benoit, W.L., McKinney, M.S., Stephenson, R.L., (2002), Effects of watching primary debates in the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign. Journal of Communication, 52,316-331. Benoit, W.L., Pier, P.M., Brazeal, L.M., McHale, J.P., Klyukovksi, A., Aime, D., (2002), The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. Westport, CT: Praeger. Benoit, W.L., McHale, J.P., (2003), Presidential candidates’ television spots and personal qualities. Southern Communication Journal, 68, 319-334. Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J., Verser, R.M., (2003), A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 335-350. Benoit, W. L., McHale, J. P., Hansen, G. J., Pier, P. M., McGuire, J., (2003), Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of the presidential campaign at the dawn of the new millennium. Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield. Benoit, W.L., McHale, J.P., (2004), Presidential candidates’ personal qualities: Computer content analysis. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images (pp. 49-63), Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield. Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J., (2004), Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, 220
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. character evaluation, and vote choice. Human Communication Research, 30, 121-144. Benoit, W.L., Stein, K.A., Hansen, G.J., (2004), Newspaper Coverage of Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41(1), 17-27. Benoit, W.L., Airne, D., (2005), A functional analysis of the Vice-Presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 225-236. Benoit, W.L., Klyukovski, A.A., (2006), A Functional Analysis of 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Debates. Argumentation, 20, 209-225. Benoit, W.L., Sheafer, T., (2006), Functional theory and political discourse: Televised debates in Israel and the United States. Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 281-297. Benoit, W.L., Hemmer, К., (2007), A functional analysis of German Chancellor debates. Conference Paper. International Communication Association: 2007 Annual Meeting. Benoit, W.L., Wen, W.-С., Yu, T.-H., (2007), A Functional Analysis of 2004 Taiwanese Political Debates. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(1), 24-39. Benoit, W.L., Davis, C., (2007), Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Senate Debates. Speaker Gavel, 44, 13-26. Benoit, W.L., Holbert, R.L., (2008), Empirical intersections in communication research: Replication, multiple quantitative methods, and bridging the quantitativequalitative divide. Journal of Communication, 58, 615-628. Benoit, W.L., Benoit-Bryan, J.M., (2013), Debates come to the United Kingdom: A functional analysis of the 2010 British Prime Minister election debates.
Communication Quarterly, 61, 463-478. Benoit, W.L., Benoit-Bryan, J.M., (2014), A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate. Journal ofArgumentation in Context, 3(2), 153-168. Benoit, W.L., Glantz, M.J., (2017), Persuasive Attacks on Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Primary. Lanham UK: Lexington Books. Boicu, R., (2009), Funcţia interpelării în discursul dezbaterii electorale televizate. în Daniela Rovenţa-Frumuşani (coord.), Ipostaze discursive (pp. 49-89), Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii Bucureşti. Boorstin, D.J., (1961/1992), The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America (1st Vintage Books ed.), New York: Vintage. Boorstin, D.J., (1987), Das Image - Der Amerikanische Traum. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Bortun, D., (2010), Semiotică. Teorii ale limbajului, Curs SNSPA. Bucureşti: Facultatea de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice. Borţun, D., (2015a), Mareea neagră. Limba română sub asediu. Bucureşti: Tritonic. Borţun, D., (2015b), Intervievat de Andra Miron, Prime Time News, Realitatea TV, 10 Iulie, 2015. Bourdieu, P., (2007), Despre televiziune. Bucureşti: Editura ART. Boutaud, J.-J., (2005), Comunicare, semiotică şi semne publicitare. Bucureşti: Tritonic. Boutaud, J.-J., Veron, E., (2007), Sémiotique ouverte. Itinéraires sémiotiques en communication. Paris: Lavoisier. Boydstun, A.E., Glazier, R.A., Pietryka, M.T., (2013), Playing to the Crowd: Agenda Control in Presidential Debates. Political Communication, 30(2), 254-277. Brants, K., Voltmer, К., (2011), Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy. Challenging the Primacy of Politics. London: Paigrave
MacMillan. Braud, R, (1991/1995), Grădina deliciilor democraţiei. Pentru o lectură psiho-afectivă a regimurilor pluraliste (trad, de Adriana şi Mihai Mitu), Bucureşti: Globus. Buey, E.R, Bradley, S.D., (2011), What the Body Can Tell Us About Politics. The Use of 221
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. Psychophysiological Measures in Political Communication Research. In E.P. Buey, L.R. Holbert (Eds.), The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research. Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques (pp. 525-540), New York and London: Taylor Francis Group. Budzyńska-Daca, A., (2012), The Idea of Debate and the Rules of Interaction in Polish Pre election TV Debates. Studia Medioznawcze {Media Studies), 1(48), 1-18. Budzyńska-Daca, A., (2015), The rhetoric of time in the final pre-election TV debates. Rhetoric and Communications E-Journal, 19, 1-10. Buja, E., (2015), Iohannis and ponta: the winner and the loser. A non-verbal communication approach to the 2014 presidential election campaign in Romania. International Conference Redefining Community in Intercultural Context RCIC’15, Braşov, 21-23 May 2015, 17-30. Braşov: Editura Academiei Forţelor Aeriene „Henri Coandă”. Burger, P., (2013), Pratiques langagières des débats et constitution des espaces publics. Bulletin VALS-ASLA {Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée), 98, 1-17. Burgoon, J., Birk, T. Pfau, M., (1990), Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research, 17, 140-169. Calbris, G., (2003), L’expression Gestuelle de la Pensée d’un Homme Politique. Paris: Ed. Du CNRS. Carr D., (2012, October 14), TV debates that sell more than just drama. The New York Times. Disponibil la: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/business/media/telcviscddebates-that-sell-more-than-just-drama.html?_r=0. Castells, M.,
(2013/2015), Comunicare şi Putere (trad, de Veronica Tomescu), Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro. Carbaugh, D., (1995), Are Americans Really Superficial?, Notes on Finnish and American Cultures in Linguistic action. In L. Salo-Lee (Ed.) Kieli kulttuuri oppimisessa ja opettamisessa [Language culture in learning and teaching], (pp. 53-60), Publications of Department of Communication 12. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Carbaugh, D., (2013), On Dialogue Studies. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 1(1), 9-28. London, UK: Dialogue Society. Carlin, D.B., (2012, October 3), Debates Are the Most Valuable Form of Presidential Campaign Communication. New York Times. Disponibil la: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/10/02/a-better-approach-topresidential-debates/debates-are-the-most-valuable-form-of-presidentialcampaign-communication. Accesat în 04.10.2016. Carp, R., (2015), „Constituţionalizarea” programului politic al Preşedintelui şi personalizarea partidelor politice. Polis, Revistă de studii politice, 111(3/9), 167-180. Chaffee, S.H., (1978), Presidential debates: Are they helpful to voters? Communication Monographs, 45, 330-346. Chaffee, S.H., (1979), Approaches of U.S. scholars to the study of televised political debates. Political Communication Review, 5, 19-33. Charaudeau, R, (2005), Le discours politique - Les masques du pouvoir. Paris: Vuibert. Charaudeau, R, Ghiglione, R., (2005), Talk-show-ul. Despre libertatea cuvântului ca mit (trad, de Oana Pocovnicu), Iaşi: Editura Pohrom. Chilton, R, Schaffner, C., (Eds.) (2002), Politics as text and talk: analytic approaches to political
discourse., (4 ed.), (Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Chiorean, C., (2014, noiembrie 28), „Politica românească este dependentă de violenţă”, Interviu cu sociologul Vasile Dâncu, preşedintele Institutului Român pentru Evaluare şi 222
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. Strategie. Sintezam. Disponibil la: http://revistasinteza.ro/politica-romaneascaeste-dependenta-de-violenta/. Choi, Y., Benoit, W., (2009), A Functional Analysis of French and South Korean Political Leaders’ Debates. Speaker Gavel, 46(1), 59-80. Choi, Y.S., Benoit, W.L., (2013), A functional analysis of the 2007 and 2012 French Presidential debates. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42, 215-227. Cmeciu, C.M., Pătruţ, M., (2010), A Functional Approach to the 2009 Romanian Presidential Debates. Case Study: Crin Antonescu versus Traían Băsescu. Revista de Studii Media {Journal ofMedia Research), 1 (6), 31 —41. Cobley, P., (2007), A Brief Note on Dialogue. In Susan Petrilli (Ed.), Philosophy of Language as the Art of Listening (pp. 13-20), Bari: Edizioni dal Sud. Cobley, R, (2014), To Be Means to Communicate. The American Journal of Semiotics, 30(3/4), 229-246. Coleman, S., (2000), Meaningful Political Debate in the Age of Soundbite. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised Election Debates, International Perspectives, London, MacMillan Press Ltd in association with The Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government, New York: St. Martin’s Press. Coleman, S., (2011), Evaluating the Debates - 2010 and Beyond. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Leaders in the Living Room: The Prime Ministerial Debates of 2010: Evidence, Evaluation and Some Recommendations. Oxford: RISJ (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism), Coleman, S., (2012), Debate on Television: The Spectacle of
Deliberation. Television New Media, XX(X), 1-11. Coleman, S., (2015, March 19), Three-D Issue 24: The debate about the debate about the debates. Media, Communication and Cultural Studies Association (MeCCSA), Disponibil la: http://www.meccsa.org.uk/news/three-d-issue-24the-debate-about-the-debate-about-the-debates/. Accesat in: 26. 02. 2017. Colletta, J.-М., Kunene, R.N., Venouil, A., Kaufmann, V. J.-P. Simon., (2009), Multi track Annotation of Child Language and Gestures. In M. K. Jean-Claude Martin, P. Paggio, D. Heylen (Eds.), Multimodal Corpora. From Models of Natural Interaction to Systems and Applications (pp. 54-72), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Čorbu, N., Boţan, M., (2011), Telepreşedinfii. Radiografii unei campanii electorale. Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro. Creţu, F., (2012), Lights, Camera, Action! How the 2009 Romanian Presidential Debates Portrayed Political Candidates. Revista română de comunicare şi relaţii publice (Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations), 14(3/27), 65-89. Cristea, D., (2013, ianuarie 28), Cultura dezbaterii la români. Contributors.ro. Disponibil la: http://www.contributors.ro/editorial/cultura-dezbaterii-la-romani/. Cwalina, W., Falkowski, A., Newman, B.I., (2011), Political marketing: theoretical and strategic foundations. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group. Deely, J.N., (2009), Purely objective reality. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. D’Errico, F., Poggi, L, Vincze, L., (2013), Discrediting Body. A Multimodal Strategy to Spoil the Other’s Image. In I. Poggi, F. D’Errico, L. Vincze, A.
Vinciarelli (Eds.), Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action (pp. 181-206), International Workshop, Political Speech 2010. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 223
Nicolae-Sorin DRĂGAN 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. IÓ8. 109. 110. Digi24.ro., (2016), С.Т. Popescu, despre afirmaţiile lui C.P. Tăriceanu: „Este un principiu comunist”. Digi24.ro, 20 octombrie 2016. Disponibil la: http://www.digi24.ro/ stiri/actualitate/politica/cristian-tudor-popescu-despre-afirmatiile-lui-calinpopescu-tariceanu-este-un-principiu-comunist-592724. Dobrescu, P„ (2003), En attendant le vote «pour». Réflexions sur les campagnes électorales roumaines. Questions de communication [En ligne] (pp. 301-312), 4, mis en ligne le 23 mai 2012. Disponibil la: https://questionsdecommunication.revues. org/5691. Drăgan, I., (2007), Comunicarea. Paradigme şi teorii (vol. I), Bucureşti: Editura Rao International Publishing Company. Drăgan, N.-S., (2015), Politicianul român între Narcis şi Pygmalion. O lectură ftincţionalsemiotică a raportului dintre operatorii „a vorbi” şi „a face” în discursul politic românesc, Romanian Review of Young Researchers (RRYR), 1(1), Drăgan, N.-S., (2016a), Presidential Elections in Romania (November 2014), A SemioFunctional Analysis. Cultures de la Communication / Cultures of communication (Journal of the Communication and Public Relations Department, Faculty of Letters, University of Bucharest), 1, 33-43. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii Bucureşti. Drăgan, N.-S., (2016b), A semio-ñmctional approach of relationship attacks-defenses for Presidential debates in Romania, from November 2014. Journal of Media Research, Cluj, 9(2/25), 36-49. Drăgan, N.-S., (2016c), Loc, rol şi poziţie. Practici discursive în discursul politic
românesc, Bucureşti, CNTC 2015. Romanian Review of Young Researchers (RRYR), International Journal edited by Romanian Association of Young Scholars, 1(4), 7-20. Drăgan, N.-S., (2016d), Strategic positioning of social actors in the semiotic act of TV debate. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series IV, Philology and Cultural Studies, 9(58/2), 37-48. Drăgan, N.-S., (2016e), A Functional Analysis of Final Televised Debates for Presidential Elections in Romania, from December 2009 and November 2014. în Iulian Boldea (coord.) Globalization and National Identity. Studies on the Strategies of Intercultural Dialogue COMMUNICATION, PUBLIC RELATIONS AND JOURNALISM SECTION (pp. 372-385),Târgu-Mureş:,Arhipelag ХХГ’ Press. Drăgan, N.-S., (2016f), A Diagnose of the Discursive Behaviour of Social Actors during Final TV Debates for Presidential Elections in Romania. In Iulian Boldea, DumitruMircea Buda (Eds.), CONVERGENT DISCOURSES. Exploring the Contexts of Communication (pp. 161-173), Târgu-Mureş:, Arhipelag XXI” Press. Drăgan, N.-S., (2017a), A ftinctional analysis of the 2004,2009 and 2014 Romanian presidential debates through the lens of intercultural communication. In Iulian Boldea şi Comei Sigmirean (Eds.), The Proceeding of the International Conference Globalization and National Identity. Studies on the Strategies of Intercultural Dialogue, COMMUNICATION, PUBLIC RELATIONS AND JOURNALISM SECTION, GIDNI4 (pp. 469A82),Târgu-Mureş: „Arhipelag XXI” Press. Drăgan, N.-S., (2017b), Positioning acts as semiotic practices in TV debates. In eProceedings of the 11th
International Semiotics Conference on „The Fugue of the Five Senses. Semiotics of the Shifting Sensorium (in the peer-review process), The XI International Conference on Semiotics, Thessaloniki, Greece, 14-16 Octombrie 2016. Drăgan, N.-S., (2017c), Analiza ftincţională a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din Romania, din perioada 2004-2014, din perspectiva modelelor de comunicare interculturală 224
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. (in the peer-review process), Romanian Review of Young Researchers (RRYR), International Journal edited by Romanian Association of Young Scholars (în curs de publicare), Drăgan, N.-S., (2017d), Semiotic Practices in TV Debates. In Alin Okeanu (ed.), Semiotics and Communication, Humanities Springer series (în curs de publicare), New York: Springer International Publishing. Dummett, M., (1984), Voting Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eco, U., (1997/2002), Kant şi ornitorincul. Constanţa: Pontica Eco, U., (1976/2008), O Teorie a Semioticii. Bucureşti: Editura Trei. Eco, U., (2000/2011), Amintirea lui Ginger Rogers. Pliculeţul Minervei (trad. Mihaela Şchiopu) (pp. 38-41), Bucureşti: Humanitás. Eliade, M., (1991), Memorii. Promisiunile echinocţiului (Vol. I, 1907-1937, ediţie şi cuvânt înainte de Mircea Handoca), Bucureşti: Humanitás. Eliade, M., (1993), Jurnal (Volumul II, 1970-1985, ediţie îngrijită şi indice de Mircea Handoca), Bucureşti: Humanitás. Eliade, M., Culianu, I. P., (1990/1993), Dicţionar al Religiilor (cu colaborarea lui H. S. Wiesner, traducere de Cezar Baltag), Bucureşti: Editura Humanitás. Elleström, L., (2010), The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermediai Relations. In L. Elleström (Ed.), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermedialny (pp. 11-48), London: Palgrave Macmillan. Emerson, P., (2013), Debates and Decisions. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 1(1), 81-93. London, UK: Dialogue Society.
Enfield, N.J., (2013), A „Composite Utterances” approach to meaning. In C. Muller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, J. Bressem (Eds.), Body ֊ Language - Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 689-706), (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1.), Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Erickson, K.V, (1998), Presidential spectacles: Political illusionism and the rhetoric of travel. Communication Monographs, 65(2), 141-153. Erickson, K.V., (2000), Presidential rhetoric s visual turn: Performance fragments and the politics of illusionism. Communication Monographs, 67(2), 138-157. Esser, F., Pfetsch, В., (2004), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Farte, G. -L, (2004), Comunicarea politică: aspecte generale şi ipostaze actuale. Argumentum (pp. 101-146), Caietele Seminarului de Logică discursivă, Teoria argumentării şi Retorică, nr. 3 (Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric), Iaşi: Editura Fundaţiei Academice AXIS. Fetzer, A., Lauerbach, G.E., (Eds.), (2007), Political Discourse in the Media. Cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Fiske, J., (1987/1999), Television Culture. London and New York: Methuen. Fiske, J., Hartley, J., (2002), Semnele Televiziunii (trad, de Daniela Rusu), Iaşi: Institutul European. Fortin, G., (2004), L’Argumentation dans les débats politiques télévisés. Négociations identitaires et co-construction d’un monde commun. D une logique
informationnelle à une sociolinguistique de l action. Thèse de doctorat Linguistique. Université Rennes 2. Disponibil la: https://halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/halshs-00003942/document. Foucault, M., (1971/1998), Ordinea discursului (trad. Ciprian Tudor), Bucureşti: Editura Eurosong şi Book. 225
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. Foucault, M., (1966/2008), Cuvintele şi lucrurile (trad. Bogdan Ghiu), Bucureşti: RAO International Publishing Company. Fracciolla, В., (2011), Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate. The Royal-Sarkozy debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2480-2488. Gauthier, G., (1994), Les débats politiques télévisés: propositions d’analyse. Les Etudes de communication publique, 9, 5-24. Gerstlé, Jacques., (1992/2002), Comunicarea politică. Iaşi: Institutul European. Ghiglione, R., (1991), Je vous ai compris ou l’analyse des discours politiques. Paris: A. Colin. Gurevitch, M.S. Coleman, J.G. Blunder., (2009), Political Communication: Old and New Media Relationships. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625(1), 164-181. Guţu, D., (2006), Pentru succesul său, Băsescu e de vină, nu noi. Revista română de comunicare şi relaţii publice (Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations), 8, 109-115. Hall, S., (1980/2005), Encoding/Decoding. In Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe and Paul Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 117-127), London: Hutchinson. Hall, T.E., (1959), The silent language. New York: Doubleday. Hall, T.E., (1966), The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday. Hall, T.E., (1976), Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday. Hall, T.E., (1983), The dance of life: The other dimension of time. New York: Doubleday. Hall, T.E., Hall, M., (1990), Understanding cultural differences:
Germans, French and Americans. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press. Halliday, M., (1978), Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning . London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K., (1985), Context of situation. In M. A. K. Halliday, R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. Halliday, M.A.K., (1994), An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition) London: Arnold. Hardy, B.W., (2017), Candidate Traits and Political Choice. In K. Kenski, K.H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (online early edition), New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Heilweg, S.A., Pfau, M., Brydon, S. R., (1992), Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers. Herrero, J.C., Benoit, W. L., (2009), The Abuse of Attacks: A Functional Analysis of the 2008 Spanish Presidential Debates. ZER (Journal of Communication Studies), 14(27), 61-81. Hersch, J., (1981/1994), Mirarea Filozofică. Istoria filozofiei europene. Bucureşti: Editura Humanitás. Hinck, E.A., ( 1993), Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Westport, CT and London: Praeger. Hinck, E.A., Hinck, S.S., (2002), Politeness strategies in the 1992 Vice Presidential and Presidential debates. In Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 234-250. Hodge, B., Kress, G., (1988), Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Holtz-Bacha, C., Kaid, L.L., (2011), Political Communication across the World
Methodological Issues Involved in International Comparisons. In E.P. Buey, L.R. Holbert (Eds.), The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research. Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques (pp. 114-126), New York and London: Taylor Francis Group. 226
Cultura Comunicării Politice în Romanía 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. Holz, J., Akin, H., Jamieson, K.H., (2016), Presidential Debates: What’s Behind the Numbers? White Paper, September 2016. Annenberg Public Policy-Center, University of Pennsylvania. Hrbková, L. Zagrapan, J., (2014), Slovak political debates: Functional theory in a multi party system. European Journal of Communication, 1-10. Iedema, I., (2003), Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(10): 29-57. Infobae.com., (2016), Llegó la hora: Hillary Clinton y Donald Trump, ante el debate presidencial más esperado de la historia de Estados Unidos, lnfobae.com, 25 de septiembre de 2016 by Mizrahi, Darío. Disponibil la: http://www.infobae. com/america/eeuu/2016/09/25/estados-unidos-ante-el-debate-presidencialmas-esperado-de-su-historia/. Accesat în 04.10. 2016. 1RES (Institutul Român pentru Evaluare şi Strategie), (2014), Agenda politică a săptămânii 2-6 iunie 2014. Opinia publică şi temele de actualitate (sondaj de opinie), Capitolul 3. Percepţii privind toamna politică, 3 iunie 2014. Disponibil la: http://www.ires.corn.ro/articol/265/agenda-politica-a-s-ptămanii-2-6-iunie2014.-opinia-publică-si-temele-de-actualitate. Isotalus, P., Aarnio, E., (2006), A Model of Televised Election Discussion: The Finnish Multi-Party System Perspective. Javnost - The Public (.Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture), 13(1), 61-72. Isotalus, R, (2011), Analyzing Presidential Debates.
Functional Theory and Finnish Political Communication Culture. Nordicom Review, 32(1), 31-43. Jamieson, K.H., (1993), Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. Oxford University Press. Jamieson, K.H., Adasiewicz, C., (2000), What Can Voters Learn From Election Debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised Election Debates: International Perspectives (pp. 25-42), New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press. Jamieson, K.H., (2011, October 2), In Presidential Debates, Personality Is Revealed. NYTimes.com. Disponibil la: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/ 10/23/do-good-debaters-make-good-presidents/in-presidential-debatespersonality-is-revealed. Accesat în 4 octombrie 2016. Jamieson, K.H., (2015), The Discipline s Debate Contributions: Then, Now, and Next. Quarterly Journal ofSpeech, 101(1), 85-97. Janney, W.R., (1999), Words as Gestures. In F. Andersen, L. Hoye, J. Wagner (Eds.) Pragmatics: The Loaded Discipline (pp. 953-972), A Special Issue of Journal of Pragmatics on the occasion of Jacob L. Mey s 70th birthday. Oxford: Pergamon. Jewitt, C., (2004), Multimodality and New Communication Technologies. In P. LeVine, R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and Technology. Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 184-195), Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Jewitt, C., (2009), An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14-27), New York: Routledge. Jewitt, C., (2011), The changing pedagogic landscape of subject English in UK classrooms. In K. L. O’Halloran, B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and
domains, 184-201. New Y ork: Routledge. Jewitt, C., (2012), Technology and reception as multimodal remaking. In S. Norris (Ed.), Multimodality in practice: Investigating theory-in-practice-throughmethodology (pp. 97-111), New York: Routledge. 227
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN Jewitt, C., (2013), Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In S. Price, C. Jewitt, B. Brown (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research (pp. 250-265), Los Angeles: SAGE. 172. Jewitt, C., Kress, G., (2003), Multimodal literacy . New York, NY: Peter Lang. 173. Jewitt, C., Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality, literacy and school English. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 342-353), Abingdon: Routledge. 174. Jewit, C Oyama, R., (2001), Visual meaning: a social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen, C. Jewit (Eds.), Handbook of visual meaning. Sage [Online]. Disponibil la: http:// www. books, google.com/ books? Id=DKqW4aAnIBAG. 175. Johnson-Cartee, K.S., Copeland, G.A., (1989), Southern voters reaction to negative political ads in the 1986 election. Journalism Quarterly, 89(66), 888-893. 176. Kasper, K., (2016), The Status of Gesture in Cognitive-functional Models of Grammar. Utrecht: LOT. 177. Katina, Z., (2015), Extending Students’ Semiotic Understandings: Learning About and Creating Multimodal Texts. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics, Vol. 1 2 (pp. 1291-1308), Netherlands: Springer. 178. Katz, E., Feldman, J., (1960), The Debates in the Light of Research: A Survey of Surveys. In S. S. Kraus (Ed.), The Great Debates: Kennedy vs Nixon, I960 (pp. 173-223), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 179. Kendőn, A., (1995), Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation.
Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247-279. 180. Kendőn, A., (2004), Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. UK: Cambridge University Press. 181. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., (2007), L’analyse du discours en interaction: quelques principes méthodologiques. Limbaje si comunicare, IX, 13-32. 182. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., (2012), Analyser du discours: le cas des débats politiques télévisés. SHS Web of Conferences, Зе Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 1,25-42. 183. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., (2013), Animer un débat électoral: l’exemple du duel SarkozyRoyal (2 mai 2007), Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée (VALS-ASLA), 98,61-81. 184. Кок, K., (2016), The Status of Gesture in Cognitive-functional Models of Grammar. Utrecht: LOT. 185. Kraus, S., (1988/2000), Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy (2nd edition), New York, London: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group. 186. Kress, G., (2003), Literacy in the New Media Age. London and New York: Routledge. 187. Kress, G., (2010), Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge. 188. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., Reid, E., (2005), English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective on teaching and learning. London: Routledge Falmer. 189. Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, T., (1996/2006), Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. 190. Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T., (2001), Multimodal discourses: The modes and media of contemporary communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 191. Krieg-Planque, A., Ollivier-Yaniv,
C., (coord.), (2011), Les „petites phrases” en politique. Communication Langages, n° 168, juin 2011. Paris: Editions Necplus. 192. Kroet, C., (2017, Mars 21), French presidential debate is TV ratings hit Nearly 50 percent of viewers watched the candidates face off. Politico.eu. Disponibil la: http://www.politico.eu/article/french-presidential-debate-is-tv-ratings-hitemmanuel-macron-marine-le-pen-francois-fillon-election. 171. 228
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 201. 202. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209. 210. 211. Legge, N.J., DiSanza, J.R., Gribas, J., Shiffler, A., (2012), He sounded like a vile, disgusting pervert ... An Analysis of Persuasive Attacks on Rush Limbaugh During the Sandra Fluke Controversy. Journal of Radio Audio Media, 19(2), 173-205. Lemert, J.B., (1993), Do televised presidential debates help inform voters? Journal of Broadcasting Electronic Media, 37, 83-94. Lempert, M., (2011), Barack Obama being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture, Gesture, 11(3), 241-270. Lempert, M, Silverstein, M., (2012), Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. LeVine, P., Scollon, R., (2004), Multimodal Discourse Analysis as the Confluence of Discourse and Technology. In P. LeVine, R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and Technology. Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-6), Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Lewis, R.D., (2005), When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures (Third Edition), London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing. Lewis, W.A., (1965), Politics in West Africa, London: George Allen and Unwin. Lichterman, P., Cefaï, D., (2006), The idea of political culture. In R.E. Goodin, C. Tilly (Eds.), Contextual Political Analysis (pp. 392-414), Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Lotman, J., (1990), The Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington IN.: Indiana University Press. Lotman, J., (1984/2005), On the
semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 205-229. Luginbühl, M., (2007), Conversational violence in political TV debates: Forms and ftinctions. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), 1371-1387. Manin, В., (1997), The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marcus, S., (1992), Center and perifery in international communication. In E. Tarasti (ed.), Center and Periphery in Representations and Institutions. Acta Semiotica Fennica I, no.2 (pp. 135-157), Imatra: International Semiotic Institute. Marcus, S., (2011), Paradigme Universale. Piteşti: Paralela 45. Maricchiolo, F., Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto M., (2012), Coding Hand Gestures: A Reliable Taxonomy and a Multi-media Support. In A. Esposito, A.M. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, R. Hoffmann, V.C. Miiller (Eds.), Cognitive Behavioural Systems 2011, LNCS 7403 (pp. 405-416), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Maricchiolo, F., Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M., (2013), Political Leaders’ Communicative Style and Audience Evaluation in an Italian General Election Debate, in I. Poggi, F. D’Errico, L. Vincze, A. Vinciarelli (Eds.), Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action (pp. 114-132), International Workshop, Political Speech 2010. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Marinho, J., (2008), Semiotics - an indispensible tool. Interview with the president of the world association of massmediatic semiotic global communication (held in Monterrey, Mexico, on 21st October 2005), In Signs, Revista Científica Internacional. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Martel, G., (2010), La
performance communicationnelle en contexte médiatique. L’exemple du débat politique télévisé. Mots. Les langages du politique [En ligne], 92, 83-102. Disponibil la: http://mots.revues.org/19532. Mazzoleni, G., Schulz, W., (1999), Mediatization of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247-261. 229
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN 212. 213. 214. 215. 216. 217. 218. 219. 220. 221. 222. 223. 224. 225. 226. 227. 228. McKinney, M.S., Carlin, D.B., (2004), Political Campaign Debates. In L.L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203-234), New Jersey (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers. McKinney, M.S., Rill, L.A., (2009), Not Your Parents’ Presidential Debates: Examining the Effects of the CNN/YouTube Debates on Young Citizens’ Civic Engagement. Communication Studies, 60(4), 392-406. McKinney, M.S., Warner, B.R., (2013), Do presidential debates matter? Examining a decade of campaign debate effects. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49, 238-258. McNeill, D., (1992), Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. McNeill (ed.), (2000), Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McNeill, D., (2005), Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Merritt, S., (1984), Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings, Journal of Advertising, 13, 27-38. Messinger, J., Messinger, C., (2014), Cartea gesturilor (trad, de Liliana Urian), Bucureşti: Editura All. Miller, M.L., (2005), Dialogue: Thinking together rather than alone. Disponibil la: http://www.lmmiller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Dialogue.pdf. Accesat în 17.02.2017. Miller, M.L., (2005), Drop the Debates, Begin the Dialogues, Posted on August 10, 2015. Disponibil la: http://www.lmmiller.com/drop-the-debates-begin-thedialogues/. Accesat ín 17.02.2017. Minow, Newton N. LaMay, Craig L., (2008), Inside the
Presidential Debates: Their Improbable Past and Promising Future. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Mittelberg, L, (2007), Methodology for multimodality: One way of working with speech and gesture data. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, M.J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Mittelberg, I., (2013), The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, J. Bressem (Eds.), Body - Language - Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 755-784), (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Müller, C., (2004), Forms and uses of the palm up open hand. In C. Müller, R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures: The Berlin conference (pp. 234-256), Berlin, Germany: Weidler. Müller, C., (2013a), Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures (pp. 202-217), In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body - Language - Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Volume 1 ), Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Müller, C., (2013b), Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In: C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, J. Bressem (Eds.), Body - Language - Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Volume 2), (Handbooks of
Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Müller, C., Ladewig, S.H., Bressem, J., (2013), Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, J. Bressem (Eds.), Body - Language - 230
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 229. 230. 231. 232. 233. 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 242. 243. 244. 245. Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 55-81), (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Navarretta, C., Paggio, P., (2013), Multimodal Behaviour and Interlocutor Identification in Political Debates. In I. Poggi, F.D’Errico, L. Vincze, A. Vinciarelli (Eds.), Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action (pp. 99-113), International Workshop, Political Speech 2010. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Nel, N., (1989), Eléments d’analyse du débat télévisé. Études de communication [En ligne], 10, 83-92. Nielsen Media Research., (2016, September 27), First Presidential Debate of 2016 draws 84 million viewers. Disponibil la: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/ news/2016/first-presidential-debate-of-2016-draws-84-million-viewers.html. Accesat în 04.10. 2016. Norris, S., (2004), Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A Conceptual Framework. In P. LeVine R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and Technology. Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 101-115), Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Nuolijärvi, R, Tiittula, L., (2000), Televisiokeskustelun näyttämöllä. Televisioinstitutionaalisuus suomalaisessa ja saksalaisessa keskustelukulttuurissa. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura O’Halloran, L.K., (2004), On the effectiveness of mathematics. In E. Ventola, C. Charles, M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on Multimodality (pp. 91-117),
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Orwell, G., (1949/1991), O mie nouă sute optzeci şi patru. Bucureşti: Editura Univers. Paatelainen, L., Croucher, S., Benoit, W.L., (2016), A Functional Analysis of the Finnish 2012 Presidential Elections. Studies in Media and Communication, 4(2), 7080. doi:10.11114/smc.v4i2.1826. Pantazi, R., (2012), Victor Ponta: Am făcut un curs de drept penal international la Universitatea din Catania, am diploma / In CV-ul premierului aparea menţiunea: „Master in drept penal international la Universitatea din Catania”. HotNews.ro, 4 iulie 2012. Disponibil la: http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-esential12699783-victor-ponta-facut-curs-drept-penal-ínternational-universitateadin-catania-diploma-premierului-aparea-mentiunea-master-drept-penalintemational-universitatea-din-catania.htm. Accesat în 14 august 2017. Patterson, T.E., (1980), The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. NewYork: Praeger. Pătruţ, M., (2015), Cadrajele mediatice şi dezbaterea prezidenţială. Studiu de caz. Polis, Revistă de studii politice, 111(3/9), 131-147. Peirce, C., (1990), Semnificaţie şi acţiune (selecţie a textelor şi traducere de Delia Marga, prefaţă de Andrei Marga), Bucureşti: Humanitás. Petrilli, S., and Ponzio, A., (2007), Semiotics today: from global semiotics to semioethics, a dialogic response. New York, Ottawa, Toronto: Legas Publishing. Petrilli, S., (2014), Sign Studies and Semioethics: Communication, Translation and Values. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pfau, M., (1987), The influence of intraparty debates on candidate
preference. Communication Research, 14, 687-697. Pfau, M. Kenski, H., (1990), Attack Politics: Strategy and Defense, Praeger Series in Public and Nonprofit Sector Marketing. Westport, CT: Praeger. Pfau, M., (2002), The subtle nature of presidential debate influence. Argumentation Advocacy, 38,251-261. 231
Nicoiae-Sorín DRAGAN 246. 247. 248. 249. 250. 251. 252. 253. 254. 255. 256. 257. 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 264. 265. Pfau, M., (2003), The changing nature of presidential debate influence in the new age of mass media communication. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference on Presidential Rhetoric at Texas A M University, College Station, TX. Pfau, M., Houston, J.В., Semmler, S.M., (2005), Presidential Election Campaigns and American Democracy. The Relationship Between Communication Use and Normative Outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(1), 48-62. Pfetsch, B., (2004), From Political Culture to Political Communication Culture. A Theoretical Approach to Comparative Analysis. In F. Esser, В. Pfetsch, Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 344-366), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pfetsch, B., (Ed.), (2014), Political Communication Cultures in Europe Attitudes of Political Actors and Journalists in nine Countries. New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Pfetsch, B., Mayerhöfifer, E., Moring, T., (2014), National or Professional? Types of Political Communication Culture across Europe. In Barbara Pfetsch (ed.), Political Communication Cultures in Europe; Attitudes ofpolitical Actors and Journalists in Nine Countries (pp. 76-102), New York: Paigrave Macmillan. Platon., (1993), Phaidros, sau Despre frumos (traducere, lămuriri preliminare şi note de Gabriel Liiceanu), Bucureşti: Editura Humanitás. Pleşu, A., (1994), Limba păsărilor. Bucureşti: Editura Humanitás. Pleşu, A., (2010, Octombrie 27), Parabolele lui Iisus. O analitică a
receptivităţii. Conferinţă în Aula Universităţii „Alexandru loan Cuza” din Iaşi. Disponibil la: https://vimeo.com/17047701. Accesat în 27. 12. 2015. Pleşu, A., (2011/2014), Despre frumuseţea uitată a vieţii (ediţia a II-а revăzută şi adăugită), Bucureşti: Editura Humanitás. Pleşu, A., (2013, Martie 1), Interviu realizat de Luca Niculescu, România lui Andrei Pleşu, Imparţial, Digi24. Disponibil la: http://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/ evenimente/andrei-plesu-la-digi24-televiziunea-a-devenit-o-prelungire-ascarii-de-bloc-50728. Pleşu, A., (2014, Octombrie 12), Interviewed by Cristian Leonte. Emisiunea „După 20 de ani” (After 20 years), ProTV. Pleşu, A., (2014, Noiembrie 10), Politicieni în delir. Adevărul. Disponibil la: http://adevărul, ro/news/politica/politicieni-delir-1 546071380dl33766a8b62 eeb/index.html. Accesat în 13. 11.2014. Pleşu, A., (2015a), Interviu realizat de Daniela Zeca-Buzura, Mic dejun cu un campion, TVR2, 9 mai 2015. Pleşu, A., (2015b, Iunie 15), Dezbateri dîmboviţene. în Adevărul. Disponibil la: http://adevarul. ro/entertainment/tv/dezbateri-dimbovitene֊l_557e6ec9cfbe376e3549fd6a/index. html. Accesat în 19. 02. 2017. Pleşu, A., (2015c), Interviu realizat de Luca Niculescu, Imparţial, Digi24, 2 august 2015. Pleşu, A., (2015d, Decembrie 14), Cum trebuie să fie un om politic? Adevărul. Disponibil la: http://adevarul.ro/news/politica/cum-trebuie-om-politicc-l_566da7e57d 919ed50e2fbcl f/index.html#. Accesat în 20. 02. 2017. Poggi, I., (2005), The goals of persuasion. Pragmatics Cogn, 13, 298-335. Poggi, I„ Pelachaud, C., (2008), Persuasion and the
expressivity of gestures in humans and machines. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen, G. Knoblich (Eds./, Embodied communication in humans and machines (pp 391-424), Oxford University Press, Oxford. Poggi, L, Vincze, L., (2008), Persuasive gaze in political discourse. In Proceedings of the AISB annual convention, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. Poggi, L, Vincze, L., (2009), Gesture, Gaze and Persuasive Strategies in Political 232
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 266. 267. 268. 269. 270. 271. 272. 273. 274. 275. 276. 277. 278. 279. 280. 281. 282. 283. 284. 285. Discourse. In M. Kipp, J.-C. Martin, P. Paggio, D. Heylen (Eds.), Multimodal Corpora. From Models of Natural Interaction to Systems and Applications (pp. 73-92), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Ponzio, A., (2006), The dialogic nature of signs (translation from Italian by Susan Petrilli), New York, Ottawa, Toronto: Legas Publishing. Pop, F., (2014, Mai 21), Cea mai elegantă definiţie a democraţiei. Ion Raţiu: „Voi lupta până la ultima mea picătură de sânge ca să ai dreptul să nu fii de acord cu mine!“. Adevărul. Disponibil la: http://adevarul.ro/locale/cluj-napoca/ceamai-eleganta-definitie-democratiei-ion-ratiu-voilupta-ultima-picatura-sangedreptul-nu-acord-cumine-l_537ca0080dl33766a8d83939/index.html. Postman, N„ (1985), Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin. Reber, B.H., Benoit, W.L., (2001), Presidential Debate Stories Accentuate the Negative. Newspaper Research Journal, 22(3), 30-43. Rogers, E.M., Hart, W.B., Miike, Y., (2002), Edward T. Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, 24, 3-26. Roitman, M., (2014), Presidential candidates’ ethos of credibility: The case of the presidential pronoun I in the 2012 Hollande-Sarkozy debate. Discourse Society, 25(6), 741-765. Roşea, V., (2007), Mediatizarea discursului electoral şi imaginea publică a candidaţilor. Iaşi: Institutul European. Rovenţa-Frumuşani, D., (1999),
Semiotică, Societate, Cultură. Iaşi: Institutul European. Rovenţa-Frumuşani, D., (2009), Introducere. Discursul modernităţii. Modernitatea discursului. în D. Rovenţa-Frumuşani (coord.), Ipostaze discursive (pp. 1747), Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii Bucureşti. Rovenţa-Frumuşani, D., (2012), Analiza discursului. Ipoteze si ipostaze. Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic. Sallé, C., (2017, Mai 4), Débat Le Pen-Macron: 16,5 millions de téléspectateurs. Le Figaro. Disponibil la: http://www.lefigaro.fr/elections/presidentielles/2017/05/04/ 35003-20170504ARTFIG00094-debat-le-pen-macron-165-millions-detelespectateurs.php. Accesat în 31 august 2017. Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., (1986), Finnish Communication Reticence. Perceptions and Selfreported Behavior. Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia, 19. University of Jyväskylä. Sarcinelli, U., (1987), Symbolische Politik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Schudson, M., (2001 ), Politics as cultural practice. Political Communication, 18(4), 421-431. Schwartzenberg, G.R., (1977), L’Etat spectacle. Essai sur et contre le star-system en politique. Paris: Flammarion. Sfera Politicii., (2011), Violenţa ca armă politică. Volumul XIX, Numărul 10(164), octombrie 2011. Fundaţia „Societatea Civilă”. Halio, J.L., (ed.) (1992/2005), The Tragedy of King Lear (2nd Edition), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Sparhawk, C.M., (1978/1981), Contrastive-identificational features of Persian gesture. In A. Kendőn (Ed.), Nonverbal Communication, Interaction, and Gesture (Selections from Semiotica) (pp. 421-458), The Hague: Mouton Publishers. The article was first published in
Semiotica, 24(1-2), 49-86. Stănescu, N., (1972), Cartea de recitire. Bucureşti: Editura Cartea Romanească. Stanley, H.W. Niemi, R.G., (2015), Vital Statistics on American Politics 2015-2016. Los Angeles, CA: CQ Press. 233
Nicolae-Sorin DRAGAN 286. 287. 288. 289. 290. 291. 292. Stelter, В., (2016, 23 September), America’s Choice 2016. 100 million? Ratings expectations for first Trump-Clinton debate are sky high. CNN.com. Disponibil la: http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/23/media/donald-trump-hiIlaryclinton-debate-ratings-expectations. Stoichiţă, V.I., (2011), Efectul Pygmalion. De la Ovidiu la Hitchcock. Bucureşti: Humanitets. Stoichiţă, V.I., (2013), Efectul Sherlock Holmes. Trei intrigi cinematografice. Bucureşti: Humanitás. Stöckl, H., (2004) In between modes: Language and image in printed media. In Eija Ventola, Cassily Charles, Martin Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on Multimodality (pp. 9-30), Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Stewart, C.J., (1975), Voter perception of mud-slinging in political communication. Central States Speech Journal, 26, 279-286. Streeck, J., (2008), A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Res Lang Soc Interact 41 (2), 154-186. Streeck, J., (2013), Praxeology of gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, J. Bressem (Eds.), Body - Language - Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 674-688), Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication 293. 294. 295. 296. 297. 298. 299. 300. 301. 302. 303. 304. Science 38.1 (Volume 1), Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Swanbrow, D., (2012, Octombrie 15), Presidential campaigns say as much about U.S. culture as candidates. Michigan News (University of Michigan), Disponibil la:
http://www.ns.umich.edu/new/releases/20880-presidential-campaigns-sayas-much-about-u-s-culture-as-candidates. Teodorescu, B., (2001), Marketing politic şi electoral. Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro. Teodorescu B., Guţu, D., Enache, R., (2005), Cea mai bună dintre lumile posibile. Marketingul politic in România 1990-2005. Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro. The New York Times., (2017, January 8), Meryl Streep s Golden Globes Speech. By Daniel Victor and Giovanni Russonello. Disponibil la: https://www.nytimes.com/ 2017/01/08/arts/television/meryl-streep-golden-globes-speech.html? r=0. Accesat în 05. 03. 2017. The Racine Group., (2002), White Paper on Televised Political Campaign Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38(4), 199-218. Trent, J.S., Friedenberg, R.V., (2004), Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (5th edition), Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield. Trent, J.S., Friedenberg, R.V., Denton, R.W., (2011), Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (7th ed.) Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Turcotte, J., (2014), Debates and the Disincentives of Democracy. Journalism Practice, 8(6), 772-788. van Dijk, T.A., (2002), Political discourse and political cognition. In P. A. Chilton, C. Schaffner (Eds.), Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical approaches to political discourse (pp. 204-236), Amsterdam: Benjamins. Van Leeuwen, T., (2005), Introducing social semiotics. London-New York, NY: Routledge. Vincze, L., Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., (2014), Precision in Gestures and Words. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 9(1), 179-198. Weger J.H., Hinck, E.,
Seiter, J., (2016), Background Nonverbal Disagreement during Televised Political Debates: A Strategic Maneuvering Approach. OSSA Conference Archive. 171. Disponibil la: http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSAll/ papersandcommentaries/171. Accesat în 24 Aprilie 2017. 234
Cultura Comunicării Politice în România 305. 306. 307. 308. 309. 310. 311. 312. 313. 314. 315. 316. 317. 318. Wolton, D., (1997/2012), Despre Comunicare (trad, de Denisa-Adriana Oprea), Bucureşti: Cornunicare.ro. ՝Zaller, J., (2005), A Review of: ‘Bush Beats Gore in Good Economy: It Was the Campaign, Stupid,’. Political Communication, 22(4), 525-536. Zarefsky, D., (2008), Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation. Argumentation, 22, 317-330. Zhu, J., Milavsky, J.R., Biswas, R., (1994), Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debate. Human Communication Research, 20, 302-333. *** (2006), Pentru succesul său, Băsescu e de vină, nu noi. Interviu realizat de Dorina Guţu cu Felix Tataru, managing director al agenţiei de publicitate GMP Advertising, şi directorul campaniei electorale a lui Traían Băsescu în alegerile locale din 2000 şi 2004 şi în alegerile prezidenţiale din 2004. Revista română de comunicare şi relaţii publice {Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations), 8, 109-115. *** (2009, Decembrie 30), CRONOLOGIE: 2009, an în care a Băsescu a luat un nou mandat şi în care Guvernul a căzut la moţiune. Mediafax, articol de Cristian Fierbinteanu. Disponibil la: http://www.mediafax.ro/politic/cronologie-2009an-in-care-a-basescu-a-luat-un-nou-mandat-si-in-care-guvemul-a-cazut-lamotiune-5233491. Accesat în 21 august 2017. *** (2014), Rezultate finale 16 noiembrie. Statistică pe competitori electorali. Biroul Electoral Central (BEC), 16 noiembrie 2014. Disponibil la:
http://www.bec2014.rO/wp-content/uploads/2014/l 1 /SIAP2014 STAT_ Statistica-pe-competitori.xlsx. Accesat în 23 august 2017. *** (2014, Octombrie 23), DOCUMENTAR Istoria alegerilor prezidenţiale (1992-1996), Emil Constantinescu: „E important ca un şef de stat să creadă în Dumnezeu“. Adevărul.ro. Disponibil la: http://adevarul.ro/news/politica/documentaristoria-alegerilor-prezidentiale-1992-1996-emil-constantinescu-e-importantsef-stat-creada-dumnezeu-l_5447ec530dl33766a826cf56/index.html. *** (2014, Noiembrie 13), Bl TV, pe primul loc în topul audienţelor cu dezbaterea dintre Klaus Iohannis şi Victor Ponta. Mediafax. Disponibil la: http://www.mediafax.ro /cultura-media/bl-tv-pe-primul-loc-in-topul-audientelor-cu-dezbaterea-dintreklaus-iohannis-si-victor-ponta-13546438. Accesat în 04.10.2016. *** (2015, Mai 27), 1990. Ziua marii confruntări. Prima dezbatere prezidenţială televizată. Digi24.ro. Disponibil la: http://www.digi24.ro/special/campanii-digi24/1990anul-O/1990-ziua-marii-confruntari-prima-dezbatere-prezidentiala-televizata396572. *** (2015, August 31), Miniştrii PSD sunt chemaţi la ordine. Interviu cu loan Statomir. Digi24, arhiva personală. *** (2015, Mai 9), Interviu cu Andrei Plesu, Mic dejun cu un campion, TVR2. Disponibil la: http://www.tvrplus.ro/editie-mic-dejun-cu-un-campion-332455. Accesat în 21 Aprilie 2016. *** (2016), ELAN - Linguistic Annotator, versiunea 5.0.0-beta. MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (Institutul Max Planck pentru Psiholingvistică din Nijmegen, Olanda), Disponibil la: http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tlatools/elan/download.
Accesat la 24.03.2017. *** (2016), Manual de utilizare ELAN - Linguistic Annotator, versiunea 5.0.0-beta. MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands {Institutul Max Planck peniru Psiholingvistică din Nijmegen, Olanda), Disponibil la: http://www.mpi.nl/ corpus/manuals/manual-elan.pdf. Accesat la 09.09. 2016. 235
Nicolae-Sorin DRĂGAN 319. 320. 321. л *** (2017), MÜMİN model of gesture annotation (Coding scheme v3.3), Centrul pentru Tehnologia Limbajului. Departamentul de cercetare Nordică, Facultatea de Ştiinţe Umaniste, Universitatea din Copenhaga, Danemarca. Reţeaua de Institute de Cercetare Nordice pentru Interfeţe Multimodale (Nordic Network for MultiModal Interfaces, MUMIN), Disponibil la: https://www.cst. dk/mumin/resources/MUMIN-coding-scheme-V3.3.doc. *** (2017), Modelul tridimensional al categoriilor culturale. CrossCulture.com. Disponibil la: https://www.crossculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/LMR_webl.png *** (2017), Baza de date cu informaţii privind participarea la vot. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), Disponibil la: http://www.idea.int/data-tools/country-view/252/40. Accesat în 19 august 2017. 236
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1196379297 |
| author_facet | Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin |
| author_variant | n s d nsd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046184507 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1122738344 (DE-599)BVBBV046184507 |
| era | Geschichte 2002-2014 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 2002-2014 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02291nam a2200505 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046184507</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191106 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191004s2018 a||| |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786062609160</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-26-0916-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1122738344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046184507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1196379297</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cultura comunicării politice în România</subfield><subfield code="b">o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014)</subfield><subfield code="c">Nicolae-Sorin Drăgan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Pro Universitaria</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">269 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ştiinţe politice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2002-2014</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Präsident</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115611-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Debatte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148952-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kommunikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031883-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kommunikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031883-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Präsident</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115611-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Debatte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148952-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2002-2014</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20191106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031563989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Rumänien |
| id | DE-604.BV046184507 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:37:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9786062609160 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031563989 |
| oclc_num | 1122738344 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 269 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20191106 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Pro Universitaria |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Ştiinţe politice |
| spelling | Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin Verfasser (DE-588)1196379297 aut Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) Nicolae-Sorin Drăgan Bucureşti Pro Universitaria 2018 269 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Ştiinţe politice Geschichte 2002-2014 gnd rswk-swf Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd rswk-swf Präsident (DE-588)4115611-0 gnd rswk-swf Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd rswk-swf Kommunikation (DE-588)4031883-7 gnd rswk-swf Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd rswk-swf Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 g Kommunikation (DE-588)4031883-7 s Präsident (DE-588)4115611-0 s Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 s Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 s Geschichte 2002-2014 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Drăgan, Nicolae-Sorin Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Präsident (DE-588)4115611-0 gnd Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd Kommunikation (DE-588)4031883-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4115611-0 (DE-588)4148952-4 (DE-588)4031883-7 (DE-588)4050939-4 |
| title | Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) |
| title_auth | Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) |
| title_exact_search | Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) |
| title_full | Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) Nicolae-Sorin Drăgan |
| title_fullStr | Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) Nicolae-Sorin Drăgan |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cultura comunicării politice în România o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) Nicolae-Sorin Drăgan |
| title_short | Cultura comunicării politice în România |
| title_sort | cultura comunicarii politice in romania o analiza functional semiotica a dezbaterilor prezidentiale din romania 2004 2014 |
| title_sub | o analiză funcţional-semiotică a dezbaterilor prezidenţiale din România (2004-2014) |
| topic | Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Präsident (DE-588)4115611-0 gnd Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd Kommunikation (DE-588)4031883-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Politik Präsident Debatte Kommunikation Rumänien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031563989&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dragannicolaesorin culturacomunicariipoliticeinromaniaoanalizafunctionalsemioticaadezbaterilorprezidentialedinromania20042014 |