Basic features of Japanese tort law:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wien
Jan Sramek Verlag
2019
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Civil law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXV, 202 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9783709701881 3709701880 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046176758 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200618 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190926s2019 au |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 015 | |a 19,N22 |2 dnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 1186728523 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9783709701881 |c : EUR 59.90 (DE), EUR 59.90 (AT) |9 978-3-7097-0188-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 3709701880 |9 3-7097-0188-0 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9783709701881 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1102641847 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB1186728523 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a au |c AT | ||
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-19 |a DE-523 |a DE-739 |a DE-384 | ||
| 084 | |a PU 8550 |0 (DE-625)140719: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 340 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yamamoto, Keizō |d 1960- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1019538864 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Basic features of Japanese tort law |c Keizo Yamamoto |
| 264 | 1 | |a Wien |b Jan Sramek Verlag |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a XXV, 202 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Civil law | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schadensersatz |0 (DE-588)4051927-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Japan |0 (DE-588)4028495-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | |a Japanese Tort Law | ||
| 653 | |a Structure of the law of torts | ||
| 653 | |a Tort Claims | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Japan |0 (DE-588)4028495-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schadensersatz |0 (DE-588)4051927-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Jan Sramek Verlag |0 (DE-588)1064203183 |4 pbl | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031556367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031556367 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804180539052130304 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD V
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS IX
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XXV
PART 1 THE LAW OF DAMAGES WITHIN THE SYSTEM FOR PROTECTION
OF RIGHTS AND LEGAL INTERESTS
I. OVERVIEW 3
A. INFRINGEMENT BY THE ACTUAL RIGHT-HOLDER 3
B. INFRINGEMENT BY ACCIDENT (CASUS) 3
C. INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT BY A THIRD PARTY 3
1. LEGAL PROTECTION BY PUNISHING THE PERPETRATOR 4
2. LEGAL PROTECTION BY GRANTING A CLAIM 4
A. PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE AS A RESULT OF A LAWFUL ACT -
COMPENSATION 4
B. PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE AS A RESULT OF AN UNLAWFUL
ACT - CIVIL LAW LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 4
II. REPARATIVE AND PREVENTIVE INJUNCTIONS 5
A. CURRENT STATUS OF THE DEBATE 5
1. THEORY BASED ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHT 5
2. THEORY BASED ON TORT 6
3. THEORY BASED ON WRONGFUL INFRINGEMENT 6
4. DUALISTIC THEORY 6
A. THEORY BASED ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS AND THEORY BASED
ON WRONGFUL INFRINGEMENT 6
B. THEORY BASED ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS AND THEORY
BASED ON TORT 7
5. CRITIQUE OF THE VIEWS PRESENTED THUS FAR 7
A. CRITIQUE OF THE THEORY BASED ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS 7
B. CRITIQUE OF THE THEORY BASED ON TORT 8
C. CRITIQUE OF THE THEORY BASED ON WRONGFUL INFRINGEMENT 8
D. CRITIQUE OF THE DUALISTIC THEORY 8
B. THEORY BASED ON THE DUTY TO PROTECT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 8
1. JUSTIFICATION OF CLAIMS FOR REPARATIVE
AND PREVENTIVE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 8
K-. !/*** I !IL:!I:IL,III)-B.^K !-.** !!*::. * I ..:**:* -* I - I
- A XI
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. STATE DUTY TO PROTECT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 8
B. DUTY OF THE COURTS TO DEVELOP THE LAW 9
2. PREREQUISITES FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS 9
3. JUSTIFICATION FOR LIMITING THE RIGHTS OF THE PERPETRATOR 9
III. DISGORGEMENT OF PROFIT 10
A. THE PROBLEM ISSUE 10
1. LIMITS OF THE PROTECTION AGAINST LEGAL INFRINGEMENTS 10
2. PROBLEM ISSUE 11
A. OBTAINING A BENEFIT BY UNAUTHORISED USE
OF A THIRD PARTY S LEGAL GOOD 11
B. OBTAINING A BENEFIT BY ONE S OWN ABILITY AND WORK 11
B. THE STATUS OF THE DEBATE IN CIVIL LAW 11
1. REJECTION OF THE CLAIM FOR SURRENDER 11
2. RECOGNITION OF THE CLAIM FOR SURRENDER 12
A. IMPUTATION OF THE BENEFIT TO THE OWNER OF THE RIGHT -
QUASI NEGOTIORUM GESTIO 12
B. SANCTIONING THE UNAUTHORISED USE 12
C. SOLUTION DE LEGE FERENDA 13
IV. OTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE VICTIM 14
A. LIMITS OF THE LAW OF DAMAGES 14
1. LIMITATIONS DUE TO THE NECESSARY PREREQUISITES 14
2. LIMITATIONS DUE TO THE FINANCIAL MEANS OF THE INJURING PARTY 14
3. LIMITATIONS DUE TO THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS NECESSARY
TO ENFORCE CLAIMS 14
B. INSTITUTIONS THAT COMPLEMENT THE LAW OF DAMAGES - LIABILITY
INSURANCE 14
1. SIGNIFICANCE 14
2. FUNCTION 15
C. INSTITUTIONS INDEPENDENT OF THE LAW OF DAMAGES 15
1. RELIEF PROVIDED BY THE COMMUNITY OF POTENTIAL CAUSERS -
ACCIDENT INSURANCE 15
A. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES 15
B. SPECIAL FEATURES 16
2. HELP FROM THE STATE - SOCIAL INSURANCE 16
A. COMPENSATION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMES 16
B. SOCIAL ASSISTANCE 16
PART 1 THE TASKS OF TORT LAW
I. COMPENSATION OF THE DAMAGE 17
A. COMPENSATION OF THE DAMAGE -
PROTECTION OF THE VICTIM S RIGHTS 17
KEIZO YANIAMOTO- BASIC R-ATURES OT JAPANESE TORT LAW
I AMI I (II (UMINH
B. LIMITATION OF THE INJURING PARTY S RIGHTS BY THE PROTECTION
OF THE VICTIM - OBSERVING THE INJURING PARTY S RIGHTS 17
II. DETERRENCE AND PENAL FUNCTION 17
A. ACTUAL FUNCTIONS IH
1. DETERRENT FUNCTION 18
2. PENALISING FUNCTION 18
B. DETERRENCE AND/OR PENALISING FUNCTION 18
1. AFFIRMATION OF THE DETERRENCE AND PENALISING FUNCTION 18
2. REJECTION OF THE DETERRENCE AND PENALISING FUNCTION 19
PART 3 STRUCTURE OF THE LAW OF TORTS
I. OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM OF DELICT LAW IN JAPAN 21
A. GENERAL RULE 21
1. REQUIREMENTS FOR LIABILITY 21
A. BASIC REQUIREMENTS 21
B. EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY-GROUNDS FOR EXONERATION 21
2. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES 22
A. DAMAGES 22
B. FURTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 23
B. SPECIAL RULES 23
1. TORT WITH THE INVOLVEMENT OF SEVERAL PARTIES 23
A. LIABILITY DUE TO THE ACTION OF ANOTHER 23
B. LIABILITY OF SEVERAL INJURING PARTIES 24
2. DAMAGE BY A THING 24
A. CIVIL CODE 24
B. SPECIAL LAWS 24
II. REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL LIABILITY TO PAY COMPENSATION:
INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT, WRONGFULNESS AND FAULT 25
A. STARTINGPOINT 25
1. THE RULE IN ART 709 CC 25
2. THE INTERPRETATION OF THE AUTHORS OF THE CIVIL CODE 25
A. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT
AS A REQUIREMENT FOR LIABILITY 25
B. SIGNIFICANCE OF FAULT AS A REQUIREMENT FOR LIABILITY 26
B. THE EMERGENCE OF THE TRADITIONAL VIEW 26
1. TURNING POINT IN THE CASE LAW 26
A. CASE LAWIN THE BEGINNING 26
B. CHANGE IN THE CASE LAW 27
2. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PREVAILING DOCTRINE -
FROM INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT TO WRONGFULNESS 27
A. THE EMERGENCE OF THE DOCTRINE OF WRONGFULNESS 27
XIII
* TABLE OF CONTENTS
B. EVALUATION OF WRONGFULNESS 28
3. THE CONCEPT OF FAULT 30
A. SUBJECTIVE ASPECT OF THE CONCEPT OF FAULT 30
B. OBJECTIVE ASPECT OF THE CONCEPT OF FAULT 30
C. CONFUSION WITHIN THE THEORY OF THE LAW OF DELICTS 30
1. UNIFICATION UNDER THE CONCEPT OF FAULT 31
A. ARGUMENTS FOR THE UNIFICATION 31
B. YARDSTICK FOR FAULT 32
2. STRICTER APPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF WRONGFULNESS AND FAULT 32
A. BLAMEWORTHINESS OF THE INJURING PARTY 33
B. CONCEPT OF WRONGFULNESS AND FAULT 33
3. DEPARTURE FROM BASING LIABILITY ON WRONGFULNESS AND FAULT 34
A. INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT 34
B. INTENTION AND NEGLIGENCE 34
D. RETURN TO THE LIBERAL RIGHTS THESIS 34
1. NECESSITY FOR LEGAL PROTECTION 35
A. RIGHTS AND LEGALLY PROTECTED INTERESTS
UNDERTHE LAWOF DELICTS 35
B. LAW OF DELICTS AS AN INSTRUMENT TO PROTECT
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 35
2. LIMITATION OF RIGHTS BY PROTECTION OF RIGHTS 35
A. BAN ON EXCESSIVITY 35
B. MEANING OF THE PRINCIPLE OF FAULT 35
PART 4 CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY AND DELICTUAL LIABILITY
I. COMPENSATION 37
A. THE RULE IN THE CIVIL CODE 37
1. REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY 37
A. FAILURE TO PERFORM 37
B. ATTRIBUTABILITY TO THE OBLIGOR 37
2. PROBLEMS 38
B. THE TERM FAILURE TO PERFORM 38
1. DIFFERENTIATION ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF FAILURE TO PERFORM 38
A. ARGUMENTATION 38
B. RECEPTION OF THE GERMAN THEORY 38
2. THE STRUCTURE OF THE OBLIGATION RELATIONSHIP AS THE PREMISE 39
A. ARGUMENTATION 39
B. INFLUENCE OF GERMAN LAW 39
3- FROM THE UNIFORM FAILURE TO PERFORM THEORY
TO THE THEORY OF BREACH OF CONTRACT 39
A. UNIFORM FAILURE TO PERFORM THEORY 39
KEI/. YAMAMOTO- BASK FEATURES VF JAOANESE LORE I AW
I ALII 1 !* ( L 1 I N I S
B. THEORY OF BREACH OF CONTRACT 40
4. REFORM OF THE CIVIL CODE 40
A. AMENDMENT IN RELATION TO FAILURE TO PERFORM 40
B. AN AMENDMENT IN RELATION TO REASONS ATTRIBUTABLE
TOTHEOBLIGOR 41
II. EXTENSION OF THE CONTRACTUAL DUTIES WITH RESPECT TO THEIR OBJECT -
PROTECTION OF THE INTEGRITATSINTERESSE 41
A. PROBLEM ISSUE 41
1. VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRITATSINTERESSE WITHIN
THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP 41
2. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DELICTUAL AND CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY 42
B. REASONS FOR CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY 42
1. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP
OF OBLIGATION 42
A. PROTECTIVE DUTIES AS CONTRACTUAL DUTIES 42
B. ESTABLISHMENT OF A PROTECTIVE DUTY 43
2. JUDGE-MADE DEVELOPMENTS IN LAW - THE DUTY TO HAVE REGARD
FOR THE SECURITY OF THE CONTRACTUAL PARTNER 43
A. DUTY OF THE EMPLOYER TO HAVE REGARD FOR THE SECURITY
OF THE EMPLOYEE 43
B. EXTENSION TO OTHER CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS 44
3. THE THEORY OF BREACH OF CONTRACT 44
A. DETERMINATION OF THE CONTENTS OF THE CONTRACT 44
B. EXTENT OF CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY 45
III. EXTENSION OF CONTRACTUAL DUTIES IN THE CHRONOLOGICAL CONTEXT -
CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO 45
A. NATURE OF THE LIABILITY 45
1. CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO 45
2. NECESSITY FOR CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO IN JAPAN 45
A. POSSIBILITY OF CATEGORISING IT AS DELICTUAL LIABILITY 45
B. PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENT PRESCRIPTION
PERIODS 46
B. GROUPS OF CASES WHEN THE CONTRACT IS NOT CONCLUDED 46
1. BREAKING OFF OF THE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS 46
A. CASE LAW 46
B. THEORY OF DEGREE OF MATURITY OF THE CONTRACT 47
2. ACCIDENT IN THE COURSE OF CONCLUDING THE CONTRACT 47
C. GROUPS OF CASES WHEN A CONTRACT IS CONCLUDED 47
1. INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE CONTRACT 47
A. ESTABLISHMENT OF LIABILITY 47
B. SCOPE OF LIABILITY 48
XV
* T-USI K OF CONTENTS
2. INADMISSIBLE INDUCEMENT TO CONCLUDE A CONTRACT 48
A. PROBLEM ISSUE 48
B. DUTY TO INFORM AS A DUTY NOT TO DO SOMETHING 49
C. DUTY TO INFORM AS A DUTY OF CONDUCT 49
D. DEVELOPMENT FROM DELICTUAL TO TRANSACTION-BASED
LIABILITY 50
PART 5 THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DELICTUAL LIABILITY
I. DAMAGE 53
A. THE CONCEPT OF DAMAGE 53
1. CALCULABLE DAMAGE - DIFFERENCE THEORY (DIFFERENZTHEORIE) ... 53
A. ACCUMULATION OF INDIVIDUAL HEADS OF DAMAGE 53
B. ASSESSMENT 54
C. CRITICISM 54
2. DAMAGE AS ACTUAL DAMAGE 55
A. CONCRETE DAMAGE 55
B. COMPREHENSIVE CONCEPT OF DAMAGE 56
B. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT AND DAMAGE 57
1. EQUATION OF INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT WITH DAMAGE 57
A. DOCTRINE OF REDUCTION OF ASSETS 57
B. LOSS IN VALUE 58
2. DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT
AND DAMAGE - NORMATIVE CONCEPT OF DAMAGE 59
A. NORMATIVE CONCEPT OF DAMAGE 59
B. GRADATION OF THE CONCEPT OF DAMAGE 59
C. NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGE AND COMPENSATION FOR PAIN
AND SUFFERING 60
1. PURPOSE OF DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING 61
A. THEORY OF RESTORATION TO THE EARLIER STATE 61
B. SANCTION AND DETERRENCE 62
2. CALCULATION OF THE DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING 63
A. CONCRETE ASSESSMENT 63
B. STANDARD RATES-FIXED AMOUNTS FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING ... 64
D. DAMAGE THROUGH UNWANTED BIRTH OF A CHILD 64
II. CAUSATION 65
A. CONCEPT OF CAUSATION 65
1. GENERAL MEANING OF CAUSATION 65
2. RELATIONSHIP OF CAUSE AND EFFECT 65
A. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAUSATION AND LIMITATION
OF IMPUTATION 65
B. THE NATURE OF THE CAUSATION TEST 66
KCR/I! YAMAMOTO * BASIC RATURTS OF JAPANESE INN I.;J
I AHI.L DL L) L I VI S
B. TEST 66
1. TESTYARDSTICK 66
A. NECESSARY CONDITION 66
B. A REGULARITY 67
2. STARTING POINTS FOR CAUSATION - CAUSE AND EFFECT 67
A. CAUSE - INJURING PARTY S CONDUCT 67
B. RESULT - INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT 69
C. COMPETING CAUSES 70
1. THE COMPETING CAUSE IS A FORCE OF NATURE 70
A. PROBLEM ISSUE 70
B. CAUSATION 70
C. NOT A CAUSATION ISSUE 71
2. OTHER INJURING ACTS AS COMPETING CAUSES 72
A. CUMULATIVE CAUSATION 72
B. NECESSARY INTERACTION OF SEVERAL CAUSES 73
3. SPECIAL RULES ABOUT JOINT TORTIOUS ACTS 73
A. THE RULE IN THE CC AND THE ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS 73
B. BROAD SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF
ART 719 PARA 1 SENTENCE 1 CC 74
C. NARROW SCOPE OF APPLICATION
OF ART 719 PARA 1 SENTENCE 1 CC 74
D. PROOF OF CAUSATION 76
1. STANDARD OF PROOF 76
A. HIGH PROBABILITY 76
B. YARDSTICK FOR EVALUATING PROBABILITY 77
2. BURDEN OF PROOF 77
A. BASIC RULE 77
B. EXCEPTION 77
PART 6 THE ELEMENTS OF IMPUTATION
I. NECESSITY TO STATE REASONS FOR IMPUTATION 81
A. BALANCE BETWEEN THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES 81
1. INDEMNIFICATION OF DAMAGE - PROTECTION
OF THE VICTIM S RIGHTS 81
2. RESTRICTION OF THE INJURING PARTY S RIGHTS BY PROTECTING
THE VICTIM - RESPECT FOR THE INJURING PARTY S RIGHTS 81
B. PRINCIPLES OF IMPUTATION 81
1. CAUSATION 81
2. FAULT 82
A. BASIS FOR LIABILITY - BLAMEWORTHINESS
OF THE ACTING PARTY 82
XVII
* TABLE OF CONTENTS
B. GROUNDS FOR EXONERATION FROM LIABILITY -
PROTECTION OF FREEDOM OF ACTION FOR THE ACTING PARTY 82
3. NO-FAULT BASED LIABILITY - STRICT LIABILITY 82
A. NECESSITY FOR NO-FAULT BASED LIABILITY 82
B. IMPUTATION PRINCIPLES OF NO-FAULT BASED LIABILITY 82
II. INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT AND WRONGFULNESS 83
A. REQUIREMENTS 83
1. INFRINGEMENT OF A RIGHT - PROTECTION
OF THE VICTIM S RIGHTS 83
2. INTENTION OR NEGLIGENCE - LIMITATION
OF THE INJURING PARTY S RIGHTS 83
B. DIFFERENT FORMS ENCOUNTERED 84
1. TYPES OF RIGHTS 84
A. RIGHTS TO CONTROL SOMETHING (HERRSCHAFTSRECHTE) 84
B. CORRELATIVE RIGHTS* 84
2. TYPES OF INTERFERENCE 86
A. PHYSICAL INTEFERENCE 86
B. INTERFERENCE WITH DECISIONS - COINCIDENCE
OF SEVERAL ASPECTS 86
C. INFRINGEMENT OF RELATIVE PECUNIARY RIGHTS - INTERFERENCE
WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS 87
1. PROBLEM ISSUE 87
A. INTERVENING POSITION OF THE OBLIGOR 87
B. RECOGNISABILITY 87
2. TRADITIONAL VIEW - ASSESSMENT OF THE DEGREE
OF WRONGFULNESS 88
A. ASSESSMENT OF WRONGFULNESS 88
B. INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS 88
C. CRITICISMS 91
3. THEORY OF BREACH OF CONTRACT 92
A. APPROACH 92
B. REASON FOR CATEGORISATION 93
C. FACTUAL CONDUCT - INTERFERENCE IN THE CONTRACT
BY FACTUAL CONDUCT 93
D. JURISTIC ACT - BREACH OF CONTRACT BY CONTRACT 94
D. INFRINGEMENT OF PUBLIC PECUNIARY RIGHTS - NUISANCE AFFECTING
NEIGHBOURS AND THE ENVIRONMENT 98
1. PROBLEM ISSUE 98
A. THE RIGHT TO ENJOY THE ENVIRONMENT 98
B. NATURE AND TYPE OF THE INTERFERENCE 98
C. OBJECT OF THE INTERFERENCE 98
XVIII , .
I EIZO 1 AMAMORO * BASIC FEATURES OF JAPANESE LOR; 1 AN
I ALII. I )I I ON I I.VI N
2. POSITIVE INFRINGEMENT - DAMAGE TO HEALTH AND LIFESTYLE
BY NOISE 99
A. TOLERANCE LIMIT 99
B. YARDSTICK TO ASSESS THE LIMITS OF TOLERANCE 99
E. CORRELATIVE PERSONALITY RIGHTS - PRIVATE SPHERE 102
1. CONCEPT OF THE PRIVATE SPHERE 102
A. RIGHT TO KEEP PRIVATE LIFE SECRET 102
B. RIGHT TO CONTROL INFORMATION IN THIS RESPECT 102
2. EXAMINATION OF INFRINGEMENT OF PRIVATE SPHERE 103
A. REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS
OF THE VICTIM - INFRINGEMENT OF THE PRIVATE SPHERE 103
B. PREREQUISITES FOR LIMITING THE RIGHTS OF THE INJURING PARTY 103
III. FAULT 104
A. THE CONCEPT OF FAULT 104
1. SUBJECTIVE FAULT 104
A. MEANING OF THE CONCEPT 104
B. PURPOSE 104
2. OBJECTIVE FAULT 105
A. MEANING OF THE TERM 105
B. PURPOSE 105
B. OBJECT OF FAULT 105
1. PROBLEM ISSUE 105
A. OBJECT OF FAULT 106
B. DUTY TO AVOID THE RESULT 106
2. AVOIDABIHTY 106
A. FORESEEABILITY AS SOLE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DUTY
TO AVOID 106
B. AVOIDABIHTY AS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT BESIDES
FORESEEABILITY 107
3. FORESEEABILITY 108
A. NECESSITY OF FORESEEABILITY 108
B. STRICTER DUTY TO MAKE EFFORTS TO FORESEE THE DAMAGE 109
C. CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESEARCH DUTY 113
C. YARDSTICK FOR FAULT 114
1. METHOD FOR ASSESSING NEGLIGENCE 114
A. LEARNED-HAND FORMULA 114
B. METHODS FOR WEIGHING UP DIFFERENT RIGHTS
AGAINST EACH OTHER 116
2. YARDSTICK WITH RESPECT TO THE PERSON 117
A. CULPA IN CONCRETE) AND IN ABSTRACTO (CONCRETE
AND ABSTRACT FAULT J 117
XIX
* TABLE OF CONTENTS
B. TYPES OF CULPA IN ABSTRACTO (ABSTRACT FAULT) -
USING THE EXAMPLE OF MEDICAL LIABILITY 118
IV. OTHER DEFECTS IN THE DAMAGING PARTY S OWN SPHERE 120
A. MISCONDUCT OF PERSONS 120
1. LIABILITY FOR AUXILIARIES 120
A. RULE FOR LIABILITY IN RESPECT OF AUXILIARIES 120
B. NATURE OF LIABILITY FOR AUXILIARIES 120
2. LIABILITY OF THOSE WITH A DUTY TO SUPERVISE 125
A. SIGNIFICANCE 125
B. REQUIREMENTS FOR LIABILITY 127
C. ANALOGUOUS APPLICATION OF ART 714 CC 130
D. LIABILITY OF THE PERSON WITH A DUTY TO SUPERVISE IN THE
CASE OF PERSONS WITH THE CAPACITY TO COMMIT DELICT 131
B. DEFECTIVE THINGS 133
1. LIABILITY OF THE POSSESSOR OR OWNER OF A STRUCTURE ON LAND ... 133
A. SIGNIFICANCE 133
B. PURPOSE 134
2. PRODUCT LIABILITY 135
A. SIGNIFICANCE 135
B. SPECIAL FEATURES 135
V. DANGEROUSNESS 136
A. SIGNIFICANCE OF STRICT LIABILITY FOR DANGEROUSNESS 136
1. NECESSITY FOR LIABILITY BASED ON DANGEROUSNESS 136
A. SOCIAL NECESSITY OF THE SOURCE OF DANGER 136
B. ACCIDENT WITHOUT FAULT 136
2. PRINCIPLES OF IMPUTATION IN RESPECT OF NON FAULT BASED
LIABILITY 136
A. PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY FOR A DANGER 137
B. PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY ON THE BASIS OF DRAWING A BENEFIT ... 137
B. STATUTORY RULES PROVIDING FOR STRICT LIABILITY
BASED ON DANGEROUSNESS 137
PART 7 LIMITATIONS OF IMPUTATION
I. LIMITATION AS REGARDS CAUSATION 139
A. ADEQUACY THEORY 139
1. DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE CAUSATION 139
A. CONCEPT 139
B. SIGNIFICANCE 139
2. ANALOGUOUS APPLICATION OF ART 416 CC 140
A. INTERPRETATION OF ART 416 CC 140
B. ANALOGOUS APPLICATION TO TORTS 140
XX
KCIZO YAMANIOTO- BASIC FEATURES OF JAPANESE ION LAW
LAHH (IT (LLMIMS *
3. PROBLEMS WITH THE ADEQUACY THEORY 140
A. APPLICABILITY IN JAPAN 140
B. UNCLEAR YARDSTICK 141
B. THREE-STEP APPROACH 141
1. FACTUAL CAUSATION 142
2. PROTECTIVE SCOPE 142
3. ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE 142
II. YARDSTICK TO DETERMINE THE PROTECTIVE SCOPE 142
A. UNIFORM YARDSTICK 142
1. ADEQUACY THEORY 142
2. PROTECTIVE PURPOSE OF THE DUTY 142
A. SIGNIFICANCE 142
B. YARDSTICK FOR ASSESSMENT 143
B. DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND CONSEQUENTIAL HARM 143
1. PRIMARY HARM - PROTECTIVE PURPOSE OF THE DUTY 144
2. CONSEQUENTIAL HARM - CONNECTION WITH WRONGFULNESS 144
A. CONCEPT BEHIND THE WRONGFULNESS ASPECT 144
B. UNDERLYING IDEAS 144
III. TYPES OF CONSEQUENTIAL HARM 145
A. CONSEQUENTIAL HARM IN RELATION TO THE SAME VICTIM 145
1. CONSEQUENTIAL HARM INFLICTED BY A THIRD PARTY 145
A. UNIFORMITY THEORY 145
B. DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND CONSEQUENTIAL HARM -
WRONGFULNESS ASPECT 146
2. DAMAGE INFLICTED BY VICTIM HIMSELF 146
A. UNIFORMITY THEORY 147
B. DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND CONSEQUENTIAL HARM -
WRONGFULNESS ASPECT 147
B. CONSEQUENTIAL HARM IN RELATION TO ANOTHER - INDIRECT VICTIM ... 148
1. CONSEQUENTIAL HARM INFLICTED UPON NEAR RELATIVES 148
A. TAKEOVER OF THE DAMAGE 148
B. OWN DAMAGE 149
2. DAMAGE SUSTAINED BY AN ENTREPRENEUR 150
A. QUESTION OF THE PROTECTIVE SCOPE 150
B. QUESTION OF THE PARTY WITH STANDING TO CLAIM 151
PART 8 THE COMPENSATION OF THE DAMAGE
I. TYPE OF COMPENSATION 153
A. DAMAGES 153
1. PRINCIPLE OF DAMAGES 153
2. TYPES OF DAMAGES 153
KU,.,- .,::,;*!.*. .!*,*!;,-:*. K,*** ..** M *., .- : I.,- XXI
* TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. COMPENSATION BY LUMP-SUM PAYMENT 153
B. COMPENSATION BY PERIODIC PAYMENT 154
C. COURT PRACTICE 154
D. APPROACHES TAKEN IN CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW 155
B. RESTITUTION IN KIND 155
1. BASIC RULE 155
2. EXCEPTION 155
II. ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES 156
A. ASSESSMENT METHOD 156
1. CUMULATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL HEADS OF DAMAGE 156
2. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE 156
B. CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN ASSESSING THE DAMAGE ... 156
1. ACTUAL CHANGES TO INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 156
A. CONCRETE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE 156
B. ABSTRACT ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE 156
2. TAKING THE VICTIM S INDIVIDUAL FEATURES INTO ACCOUNT 157
A. INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT 157
B. STANDARD-RATE ABSTRACT ASSESSMENT 157
III. REDUCTION OF COMPENSATION 158
A. MITIGATION OF DAMAGES BY BENEFITS RECEIVED (VORTEILSAUSGLEICH) 158
1. CONCEPT 158
2. RATIONALE 158
A. DIFFERENCE THEORY (DIFFERENZTHEORIE) 158
B. PRINCIPLE OF THE BAN ON ENRICHMENT 159
3. WHICH BENEFITS? 159
A. DIFFERENCE THEORY 159
B. BAN ON ENRICHMENT 159
B. CONTRIBUTORY FAULT 160
1. OVERVIEW 160
A. CONSIDERATION OF FAULT 160
B. REDUCTION OF COMPENSATION AWARD 161
2. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE VICTIM S FAULT 161
A. RE-SHIFTING OF THE DAMAGE BACK TO THE VICTIM 161
B. LIMITATION OF THE SCOPE OF THE INJURING PARTY S LIABILITY 163
C. EXTENSION OF CONTRIBUTORY FAULT - VICTIM S PREDISPOSITION 165
1. AFFIRMATION THAT PREDISPOSITIONS OF THE VICTIM
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED 165
A. PREDISPOSITIONS TO BE CONSIDERED 166
B. JUSTIFICATION FOR TAKING THIS INTO ACCOUNT 167
2. NEGATION THAT PREDISPOSITIONS OF THE VICTIM
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED 168
YVTT
KEIZO YAMAMOTO * BASIC FEATURES OFJAPANESE TORT I AW
1 H I 1 I I I I S
A. RATIONALE 168
B. CONSIDERATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK
OF CONTRIBUTORY FAULT 169
D. REDUCTION OF THE DUTY TO COMPENSATE 169
PART 9 PRESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS
I. SHORT PRESCRIPTION PERIOD UNDER ART 724 SENTENCE 1 CC 171
A. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SHORT PRESCRIPTION PERIOD 171
1. THE NATURE OF THE SHORT PRESCRIPTION PERIOD 171
A. PRESCRIPTION OF CLAIMS 171
B. SHORT PRESCRIPTION PERIOD FOR COMPENSATION CLAIMS
ARISING OUT OF TORT 171
2. REASON FOR THE SHORT PRESCRIPTION PERIOD 171
A. IN ORDER TO AVOID EVIDENTIARY DIFFICULTIES 172
B. SENSE OF INJURY SUBSIDES OVER TIME 172
C. SAFEGUARDING THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE PARTY LIABLE
TO PAY COMPENSATION 173
B. COMMENCEMENT OF THE PRESCRIPTION PERIOD 174
1. SIGNIFICANCE 174
2. KNOWLEDGE OF THE TORT 174
3. KNOWLEDGE OF THE DAMAGING PARTY 174
4. KNOWLEDGE OF THE DAMAGE 175
A. SIGNIFICANCE 175
B. ONGOINGTORT 175
C. AFTEREFFECTS 176
II. LONG PERIOD UNDER ART 724 SENTENCE 2 CC 177
A. PURPOSE OF THE LONG PERIOD 177
1. NATURE OF THE LONG PERIOD 177
A. PROBLEM ISSUE 177
B. PRESCRIPTION 178
C. CUT-OFF PERIOD 179
2. POSSIBILITY OF SUSPENDING THE PERIOD 180
A. PROBLEMS 180
B. REJECTION OF SUSPENSION 180
C. ADVOCATION OF SUSPENSION 180
B. COMMENCEMENT OF THE LONG PERIOD 181
1. TIME OF THE DAMAGING ACT 181
2. TIME THE DAMAGE OCCURRED 181
A. EXAMPLES 181
B. RATIONALE 181
III. REFORM OF THE CIVIL CODE 182
XXIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. AMENDMENTS IN RELATION TO THE LONG PERIOD 182
B. SPECIAL RULES ON THE PRESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS
FOR INJURY TO LIFE AND BODILY INTEGRITY 182
INDEX 185
PUBLICATIONS 195
XXIV
KCIZO YAMAINORO BASIC H-ATURES OR JAPANESE TORT LAW
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Yamamoto, Keizō 1960- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1019538864 |
| author_facet | Yamamoto, Keizō 1960- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Yamamoto, Keizō 1960- |
| author_variant | k y ky |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046176758 |
| classification_rvk | PU 8550 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1102641847 (DE-599)DNB1186728523 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01702nam a22004698c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046176758</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200618 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190926s2019 au |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,N22</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1186728523</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783709701881</subfield><subfield code="c">: EUR 59.90 (DE), EUR 59.90 (AT)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-7097-0188-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3709701880</subfield><subfield code="9">3-7097-0188-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783709701881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1102641847</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1186728523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">au</subfield><subfield code="c">AT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 8550</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140719:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="2">sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yamamoto, Keizō</subfield><subfield code="d">1960-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1019538864</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Basic features of Japanese tort law</subfield><subfield code="c">Keizo Yamamoto</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wien</subfield><subfield code="b">Jan Sramek Verlag</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXV, 202 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Civil law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4051927-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4028495-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Japanese Tort Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Structure of the law of torts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tort Claims</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4028495-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4051927-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jan Sramek Verlag</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1064203183</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031556367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031556367</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Japan (DE-588)4028495-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Japan |
| id | DE-604.BV046176758 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:37:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)1064203183 |
| isbn | 9783709701881 3709701880 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031556367 |
| oclc_num | 1102641847 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-523 DE-739 DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-523 DE-739 DE-384 |
| physical | XXV, 202 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Jan Sramek Verlag |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Civil law |
| spelling | Yamamoto, Keizō 1960- Verfasser (DE-588)1019538864 aut Basic features of Japanese tort law Keizo Yamamoto Wien Jan Sramek Verlag 2019 XXV, 202 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Civil law Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd rswk-swf Japan (DE-588)4028495-5 gnd rswk-swf Japanese Tort Law Structure of the law of torts Tort Claims Japan (DE-588)4028495-5 g Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 s DE-604 Jan Sramek Verlag (DE-588)1064203183 pbl SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031556367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Yamamoto, Keizō 1960- Basic features of Japanese tort law Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4051927-2 (DE-588)4028495-5 |
| title | Basic features of Japanese tort law |
| title_auth | Basic features of Japanese tort law |
| title_exact_search | Basic features of Japanese tort law |
| title_full | Basic features of Japanese tort law Keizo Yamamoto |
| title_fullStr | Basic features of Japanese tort law Keizo Yamamoto |
| title_full_unstemmed | Basic features of Japanese tort law Keizo Yamamoto |
| title_short | Basic features of Japanese tort law |
| title_sort | basic features of japanese tort law |
| topic | Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Schadensersatz Japan |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031556367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotokeizo basicfeaturesofjapanesetortlaw AT jansramekverlag basicfeaturesofjapanesetortlaw |