Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji: reformski okvir i EU standardi
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Beograd
Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja
2018.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 261-267 |
| Beschreibung: | 270 Seiten Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9788680756134 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046045214 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 190711s2018 xx a||| |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788680756134 |9 978-86-80756-13-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1109127638 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046045214 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kolaković-Bojović, Milica |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |b reformski okvir i EU standardi |c Dr Milica Kolaković-Bojović |
| 264 | 1 | |a Beograd |b Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja |c 2018. | |
| 300 | |a 270 Seiten |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 261-267 | ||
| 546 | |a Text serbisch | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 2013-2018 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Harmonisierung |0 (DE-588)4125517-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Justiz |0 (DE-588)4073136-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvereinheitlichung |0 (DE-588)4048849-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Justizreform |0 (DE-588)4139503-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Justiz |0 (DE-588)4073136-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Justizreform |0 (DE-588)4139503-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Harmonisierung |0 (DE-588)4125517-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Rechtsvereinheitlichung |0 (DE-588)4048849-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |a Geschichte 2013-2018 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20190711 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4971 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031426840 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820142920168112128 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
SADRŽAJ UVOD. . 17 Deo I Osnovi organizacije pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Glava I NORMATIVNI OKVIR ORGANIZACIJE PRAVOSUĐA U REPUBLICI SRBIJI 1. Normativni okvir organizacije pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji. 23 2. Uloga strateških dokumenata u normativnom okviru koji uređuje organizaciju i fimkcionisanje pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji. 24 2.1. POGLAVLJE 23 KAO STRATEŠKI OKVIR REFORME PRAVOSUĐA U REPUBLICI SRBIJI.25 2.1.1. Preporuke usmerene na jačanje nezavisnosti pravosuđa. 27 2.1.2. Nepristrasnost i odgovornost. 29 2.1.3. Stručnost i efikasnost. 30 2.1.4. Ratni zločini. 32 Glava II INSTITUCIONALNI OKVIR ORGANIZACIJE PRAVOSUĐA U REPUBLICI SRBIJI 1. Organizacija i nadležnost sudova u Republici Srbiji. 33 1.1. SPOLJAŠNJA ORGANIZACIJA SUDOVA. 33 1.2. UNUTRAŠNJE UREĐENJE SUDOVA U REPUBLICI SRBIJI. 39
1.3. POLOŽAJ SUDIJA U REPUBLICI SRBIJI. 44 1.3.1. Izbor sudija. 44 1.3.2. Garancije nezavisnosti u obavljanju sudijske funkcije. 46 1.3.3. Dužnosti sudije . 48 1.3.4. Vrednovanje rada.49 1.3.5. Prestanak sudijske funkcije. 50 1.3.6. Disciplinska odgovornost sudija. 51 1.4. PREDSEDNIK SUDA. 55 1.5. SUDIJE POROTNICI. 57 1.6. SUDSKO OSOBLJE.59 2. Organizacija i nadležnost javnih tužilaštava u Republici Srbiji.61 2.2. UNUTRAŠNJE UREĐENJE JAVNOG TUŽILAŠTVA. 64
2.3. POLOŽAJ JAVNIH TUŽILACA I ZAMENIKA JAVNIH TUŽILACA U REPUBLICI SRBIJI. 69 2.3.1. Izborjavnih tužilaca i zamenika javnih tužilaca. 69 2.3.2. Osnovni principi vršenja javno tužilačke funkcije. 72 2.3.3. Odgovornost tužilaca i javnih tužilaca i prestanakfunkcije. 76 2.4. OSOBLJE U JAVNIM TUŽILAŠTVIMA.81 3. Visoki savet sudstva. 83 4. Državno veće tužilaca. 85 5. Ministarstvo pravde.88 6. Pravosudna akademija. 89 7. Državno pravobranilaštvo. 93 8. Javni izvršitelji. 98 9. Javni
beležnici. 104 10. Posrednici (medijatori). 113 11. Advokatura. 115 Glava II EU integracije kao strateško-dinamički okvir reforme pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Glava I NEZAVISNOST PRAVOSUĐA 1. Pravnoteorijske postavke nezavisnosti pravosuđa. 2. Inicijalni koraci na uspostavljanju ustavnih temelja nezavisnosti pravosuđa. 3. Uticaj procesa evropskih integracija na jačanje nezavisnosti pravosuđa. 3.1. JAČANJE NEZAVISNOSTI PRAVOSUĐA U SKLADU S A AKCIONIM PLANOM ZA POGLAVLJE 23. 4. Jačanje nezavisnosti pravosuđa Republike Srbije putem ustavnih promena. 4.1. (NE)POSTOJANJE I (NE)OBAVEZNOST STANDARDA U POGLEDU USTAVNOG POLOŽAJA I NEZAVISNOSTI PRAVOSUĐA. 4.2. PROCEDURALNI ASPEKTI PROMENE VAŽEĆEG USTAVA. 4.3. MATERIJALNOPRAVNI ASPEKTI PROMENE USTAVA. 127 132 135 138 142 143 145 150 4.3.1. 4.3.2. 4.3.3. 4.3.4. Prenos nadležnosti na
Visoki savet sudstva i Državno veće tužilaca. 151 Obavezna obuka kao preduslov za prvi izbor na pravosudnu funkciju. 154 Stalnost mandata kao individualna garancija nezavisnosti sudije.156 Sastav pravosudnih saveta i mehanizmi za sprečavanje blokade odlučivanja (antideadlock mechanism). 158 4.3.5. Nedoslednost u stavovima Venecijanske komisije. 162 4.3.6. Detaljnije propisivanje razloga za prestanak sudijske funkcije. 165 4.3.7. Specifičnosti rešenja koja se odnose na javna tužilaštva. 165 4.4. PERSPEKTIVE, MOGUĆI I VEROVATNI ISHODI USTAVNIH PROMENA. 167
Glava II NEPRISTRASNO I ODGOVORNO PRAVOSUĐE I KVALITET PRAVDE 1. Etika і integritet і disiplinska odgovornost nosilaca pravosudnih funkcija u svetlu reformskih procesa u okviru Poglavlja 23. 172 1.1. PLANOVI INTEGRITETA.176 2. Automatska raspodela predmeta kao preduslov nepristrasnosti. 179 3. Ujednačenost sudske prakse kao temelj pravne predvidivosti. 182 3.1. SUDSKA PRAKSA KAO IZVOR PRAVA. 183 3.2. PREDLOŽENE INTERVENCIJE U NACRTU AMANDMAN NA USTAV. 187 3.2.1. Dostupnost propisa i sudskih odluka kao preduslov ujednačenosti sudske prakse.189 Glava III STRUČNOST NOSILACA PRAVOSUDNIH FUNKCIJA Glava IV EFIKASNOST PRAVOSUĐA 1. Adekvatna mreža sudova i javnih tužilaštava kao preduslov efikasnosti pravosuđa. 203 1.1. UNAPREĐENJE PRAVOSUDNE MREŽE U KONTEKSTU PRISTUPNIH PREGOVORA SA EU. 208 2. Rešavanje zaostalih predmeta i trajanje sudskih postupaka. 210 3. Uticaj reforme sistema izvršenja na efikasnost pravosuđa. 218 4. Reforma krivičnog
procesnog i efikasnost pravosuđa. 220 5. Uloga pravosudnih profesija u rasterećenju i unapređenju efikasnosti pravosuđa. 223 5.1. JAVNO BELEŽNIŠTVO I EFIKASNOST PRAVOSUĐA. 223 5.2. MEDIJACIJA KAO MEHANIZAM RASTEREĆENJA PRAVOSUĐA. 225 6. Pravosudni budžet i infrastruktura i efikasnost krivičnog pravosuđa. 228 6.1. ULOGA IKT-A U EFIKASNOSTI PRAVOSUĐA. 230 7. Pravo stanje i perspektive efikasnosti pravosuđa. 233 Glava V MONITORING I EVALUACIJA PRAVOSUDNE REFORME U REPUBLICI SRBIJI 1. Pokušaji uspostavljanja efikasnog monitoring mehanizma pre usvajanja NSRP 2013-2018 . 237 2. Monitoring i evaluacija NSRP 2013-2018.207 . 240 2.1. STRUKTURA I FUNKCIONISANJE MEHANIZMA. 240
2.2. REZULTATI PETOGODIŠNJEG FUNKCIONISANJA MONITORING MEHANIZMA ZANSRP 2013-2018. 2.2.1. Transparentnost rada Komisije. 2.2.2. Mehanizmi ranog uzbunjivanja i ubrzanja reformskog procesa. 3. Monitoring i evaluacija pravosudne reforme u okviru Poglavlja 23 . 3.1. STRUKTURA I FUNKCIONISANJE MONITORING MEHANIZMA ZA AP 23 . 3.2. REZULTATI DVOIPOGODIŠENJEG FUNKCIONISANJA MONITORING MEHANIZMA ZA AP 23 . 243 245 246 246 246 248 3.2.1. Mehanizam ranog uzbunjivanja u slučaju zastoja u sprovođenju AP 23. 251 3.2.2. Uloga civilnog društva u praćenju sprovođenja AP 23.252 4. Koordinacija paralelnih monitoring mehanizama pravosudne reforme.253 4.1. ODNOS MONITORING MEHANIZAMA ZA NSRP 2013-2018 I AP 23 . 254 5. Dalji koraci na unapređenju mehanizama monitoringa i evaluacija pravosudne reforme.255 ALBUKERKI (ILI DALJI PUT
REFORME).259 LITERATURA. 261 PROPISI. 268
261 Dr Milica Kolaković - Bojović LITERATURA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Agencija za borbu protiv korupcije (2012): Priručnik za izradu plana integriteta, str. 3. dostupno na: http://www.acas.rs/images/stories/Prirucnik_ konacna_verzija.pdf, pristupljeno 2. februara 2015. godine. Akcioni plan za Poglavlje 23, dostupno na: https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/ tekst/12647/akcioni-plan-za-pregovaranje-poglavlja-23-usvojen-na-sednici-vlade-srbije-27-aprila-2016.php, pristupljeno 24. juna 2018. godine. Akcioni plan za sprovođenje Nacionalne strategije reforme pravosuđa za period 2013-2018, ”Službeni glasnik RS”, broj 71/13. Analiza potrebnog broja zamenika javnih tužilaca u javnim tužilaštvima u Republici Srbiji, dostupno na: https://www.uts.org.rs/aktivnosti/vesti/ 1247-analiza-potrebnog-broja-zamenika-javnih-tuzilaca-u-javnim-tuzilastvima-u-republici-srbiji, pristupljeno 12. avgusta 2018. godine. Analiza ustavnog okvira о pravosuđu u Republici Srbiji, dostupno na: http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/tekst/5847/radna-grupa-za-izradu-analize-izmene-ustavnog-okvira.php, pristupljeno 23. maja 2017. godine. Angelis, T. J. Harrison, J. H. History and Importance ofthe Rule ofLaw, 2003, 9, https://worldjusticeproj ect.org/sites/default/files/documents/history_and_importance_of_the_rule_of4aw.pdf, last accessed on March 3rd 2018. Bangalore Principles ofJudicial Conduct (the Bangalore Principles), adop ted by the United Nations Human Rights Committee on 23 April 2003. Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, Adopted by the Se venth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and
the Tre atment of Offenders held at Milan from 26 August to 6 September 1985 and endorsed by General Assembly resolutions 40/32 of 29 November 1985 and 40/146 of 13 December 1985. Bejatović, S. i dr. (2013) Priručnik za primenu Zakonika о krivičnom pos tupku, Beograd, Udruženje javnih tužilaca i zamenika javnih tužilaca Srbije. Bingham, T. (2011) The Rule ofLaw, London, Penguin books. Blanuša, A. (2017) Ujednačena sudska praksa kao temelj pravne sigurnosti i pospeđujući faktor za direktne strane investicije, u: Bejatović, S, Vukadinović, R., Turanjanin, V: Pravna sigurnost kao pospešujućifaktor za direktne strane investicije, Kragujevac. C. Montesquieu, The Spirit ofLaws, 1748. Calvez F. Régis, N. (2012) Length of court proceedings in the member states ofthe Council ofEurope based on the case law ofthe European Court ofHuman Rights, 2nd Edition, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice {CEPEJ), Strasbourg. Cicero, M.T. Pro Cluentio, Harvard University Press-London, 1967 Consultative Council Of European Judges (CCJE), Opinion No 1 (2001) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) for the Attention
262 Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji - reformski okvir i EU standardi of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Standards Con cerning the Independence ofthe Judiciary and the Irremovability of Judges, Strasbourg, 23 November 2001; • Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE), Opinion no. 10(2007) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee ofMinisters of the Council ofEurope on the Councilfor the Judiciary at the service ofsociety, adopted by the CCJE at its 8th meeting (Strasbourg, 21-23 November 2007; • Consultative Council ofEuropean Judges, Magna Carta ofJudges, Stras bourg, 17 November 2010 CCJE (2010)3; Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. R (94) 12 ofthe Committee ofMinisters to Member States on the Independence, Efficiency and Role ofJudges (Adop ted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 October 1994 at the 518th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies); • Consultative Council of European Judges, Opinion No. !8 (2015) The po sition of the judiciary and its relation with the other powers of state in a modem democracy, London, 16 October 2015. • Čvorović, D, Turanjanin, V. (2015) Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku. Anali Pravnog fakultetu u Beogradu, br. 1, str. 217-233. • European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2007)004, Opinion on the Constitution of Serbia, Adopted by The Venice Commission at its 70th Plenary Session (Venice, 17-18 March 2007); • European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) CDL-PI(2018)003
Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions and Re ports Relating to Qualified Majorities and Anti-Deadlock Mechanisms in Relation to the Election by Parliament of Constitutional Court Judges, Pro secutors General, Members of Supreme Judicial and Prosecutorial Councils and the Ombudsman, Strasbourg, 8 June 2018. • European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commissi on) Serbia Draft Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, CDL-REF(2018)015, Strasbourg, 26 April 2018. • European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) Opinion on the Provisions on the Judiciary in the Draft Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, adopted by the Commission at its 64th plenary session (Venice, 21-22 October 2005); • European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2007)028, Judicial Appointments Report adopted by the Venice Commission at its 70th Plenary Session (Venice, 16-17 March 2007); • European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2010)004-e, Report on European Standards as Regards the Inde pendence of the Judicial System: Part I- The Independence of Judges, Ado pted by the Venice Commission at its 82th plenary session (Venice, 12-13 March 2010);
Dr Milica Kolaković - Bojović • • • • • • • • • • • • 263 European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2010)040, Report on European Standards as Regards the Inde pendence of the Judicial System: Part II— The Prosecution Service, Ado pted by the Venice Commission at its 85th plenary session (Venice, 17-18 December 2010). European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) Opinion on two Sets ofDraft Amendments to the Constitutional Provisions Relating to the Judiciary of Montenegro, adopted by the Commission at its 93rd plenary session (Venice, 14-15 December 2012; European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) Opinion on Recent Amendments to the Law on Major Constitutional provisions of the Republic ofAlbania, CDL-INF (1998)009, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 100th Plenary Session (Rome, 17th April 1998); European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2014)029-e, Opinion on the Draft amendments to the Law on the State Prosecutorial Council ofSerbia, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 100th Plenary Session (Rome, 10-11 October 2014); European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2014)028-e, Opinion on the Draft Amendments to the Law on the High Judicial Council of Serbia, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 100th Plenary Session (Rome, 10-11 October 2014). European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD(2017)002, Republic of Moldova- Amicus curiae brieffor the Constitutional Court on the criminal liability of
judges, Venice, 10-11 March 2017. Evropska komisija za efikasnost pravnih sistema- Commission européenne pour l’efficacité de lajustice - The European Commission for the Ecfficiency ofJustice (2014): Report on European judicial systems - Edition 2014 (2012 data): efficiency and quality ofjustice. Evropska komisija za efikasnost pravnih sistema- Commission européenne pour l’efficacité de lajustice - The European Commission for the Ecfficiency of Justice (2016): Report on European judicial systems ֊ Edition 2016 (2014 data): efficiency and quality ofjustice. Flajner, T. (2009) Nezavisnost sudstva. Anali Pravnogfakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, 4, տէր. 93-120; Ilié, G. (2009) Pravosudno organizaciono pravo, Drugo izmenjeno izdanje, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu i Službeni glasnik, Beograd. Izveštaj br. 2/2018 о sprovođenju Akcionog plana za Poglavlje 23, dostupno na: https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/tekst/20416/izvestaj-br-22018-osprovodjenju-akcionog-plana-za-poglavlje-23.php, pristupljeno 21. avgusta 2018. godine Izveštaj о radu Disciplinskog tužioca Visokog save ta sudstva za 2013. godinu, dostupno na: http://www.vss.sud.rs/
264 • • • • • • • • • • • • • Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji ֊ reformski okvir i EU standardi sr/%D 1 %81 % D0% B5 %D0% B4%D0% В D% D0% В 8% D1 %86%D0% B5/%D0%B0%D 1 %80%D 1 %85%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0/2014. pristupljeno 1. januara 2015. godine IzveštajoraduVisokogsavetasudstvaza2012.godinu,dostupnona: http://\vww. vss.sud.rs/sr/%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B5%D 1 %88%D 1 %82 %D0%B0%D ! %98-%D0%BE-%D 1 %80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D 1 %83 . pristupljeno 1. januara 2015. godine Izveštaj о skriningu za Poglavlje 23, dostupno na: https://www.mpravde. gov.rs/tekst/7073/izvestaj-o-skriningu.php, pristupljeno 25. juna 2018. go dine Jedinstveni program rešavanja starih predmeta, dostupno na: http://www. vk.sud.rs/sites/default/files/files/ResavanjeStarihPredmeta/jedinstveni_program.pdf, pristupljeno 2.12.2014. Jimeno-Bulnes, M. (2010) Towards Common Standards on Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings in the EU? Ceps ‘Liberty And Security In Europe, pp. 2-21. Kelly, J. A. (1992) Short History of Western Legal Theon\ Claderon Press: Oxford Knežević, M. (2017) Projekat “Efikasnost pravosuđa ”, komponenta 1 ujednačavanje sudske prakse, uporednoprcrvni izveštaj, deo pivi: Austrija. Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2014) Efikasnost krivičnog postupka, reforma pra vosuđa i pristupni pregovori sa EU, Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i so ciološka istraživanja, br. 1-2 Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2016) Constitutional Provisions on Judicial Independence and EU Standards, Anali Pravnog Fakulteta Univeiziteta и Beogradu (Annals ofthe Faculty oflaw in Belgrade, Belgrade Law Review. 3, pp.
192-204. Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2016) Okončanje krivičnog postupka u razumnom roku, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2016) Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji i Poglavlje 23, Evropske integracije i krivično zakonodavstvo, (Bejatović, S. ur.) Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu, OEBS, ZlatiborBeograd, str. 98-106. Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2018) Nezavisnost pravosuđa i efikasnost sudske zaštite kao međunarodni pravni standard i uslov članstv a u EU. Oiganizacijapravosuđa u Republici Srbiji i efikasnost sudske zaštite, (Bejatović. S. ur.) Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu, Zlatibor, (u štampi) Kolaković-Bojović, M. i Turanjanin, V. (2017) Autonomy of public prose cution service- the impact of the “checks and balances” principle and inter national standards, Journal ofEastern European Criminal Law, No. 2. Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2017) Stavovi Venecijanske komisije kao okv ir ustavnih promena u oblasti pravosuđa Republici Srbiji, Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, br. 2, str. 21-37.
Dr Milica Kolaković - Bojović • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 265 Kostić, L.M. (2000) Komentar Ustava - Jugoslovensko ustavno pravo (Sabrana dela, I ֊ Ustavno pravo), Beograd; Locke, J. Two Treatises of Government, Book Two, Chapter IX, par. 131, dostupno na: http://www.yorku.ca/comninel/courses/3025pdi7Locke.pdf, pristupljeno 16. februara 2018. Marinkovič, T. (2010) Jemstva sudijske nezavisnosti u ustavima Kneževine i Kraljevine Srbije, Anali Pravnogfakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2, str. 143-157. Markićević, A. ( 1997) Organizacija sudova i efikasnost krivičnog postupka, Jugoslovenska revija za kriminoloģiju i krivično pravo, br. 2-3 Matič, M (2007) Nacionalna strategija reforme pravosuđa: potreba nad po trebama na putu ka vladavini prava, Reforma pravosuđa i građansko dru štvo: Na putu ka vladavini prava, Toplički centar za demokrātiju i ljudska prava, Prokuplje. McBride, J. (2009) Human Rights and Criminal Procedure- The Case Law ofEuropean Court ofHuman Rights, Council of Europe. Mišljenje Konsultativnog veća evropskih sudija od 4. maja 2018 (CCJEBU(2018)4) na zahtev Društva sudija Srbije da proceni kompatibilnost sa evropskim standardima predloženih amandmana na Ustav Republike Srbije koji će uticati na organizaciju sudske vlasti (https://rm.coe.int/opinion-of -the-bureau-of-the-ccje-on-serbia-of-4-may-2018/16807d51 ab). Nacionalna strategija reforme pravosuđa za period od 2013-2018. godine, “Službeni glasnik RS”, broj 57/13. Nacionalna strategija reforme pravosuđa, “Službeni glasnik RS”, broj 44/06. Nacionalna strategija za borbu protiv kompcije za period od
2013. do 2018. godine, “Službeni glasnik RS”, broj 57/13. Nacionalna strategija za procesuiranje ratnih zločina, “Službeni glasnik RS”, broj 19/16. Noam, E. (1982) Case Quotas in the Court: An Analysis of the Allocation of Judicial Resources, Journal ofResearch in Crime and Delinquency, Voi. 19, No. 2, pp. 204-215. Noam, E. (1982) Resource Allocation and Access to the Criminal Courts: An Economic Model, The Windsor Yearbook ofAccess to Justice, Voi. 2, pp. 208-223. Orlovič, S. (2010) Stalnost sudijske fhnkcije vs. opšti reizbor sudija u Re publici Srbiji. Anali Pravnogfakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2, str. 163186; OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions Max Planck Minerva Research Group and Human Rights on Judicial Independence, KYIV RECOMMEN DATIONS ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN EASTERN EUROPE, SO UTH CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA - Judicial Administration, Selecti on and Accountability - Kyiv, 23-25 June 2010; Papič, T. (2016) Pravo і praksa disciplinske odgovornosti sudija u Srbiji,
266 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji - reformski okvir і EU standardi Misija OEBS-a u Republici Srbiji. Paterson, A, Paterson, C. (2012) Guarding the guardians? Towards an independent, accountable and diverse seniorjudiciary, CentreForum; Pekkanen, P. (2011): Delay Reduction in Courts ofJustice-Possibilities and Challenges ofProcess Improvement in Professional Public Organizations, Doctoral Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis. Recommendation CM/Rec(2010) 12 of the Committee of Ministers to mem ber states on independence, efficiency and responsibility ofjudges. Recommendation Rec(2000)19 of the Council of Europe on the role of pu blic prosecution in the criminal justice system, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 October 2000 at the 724th meeting ofthe Ministers’ Deputies. Skulić, M. (2009) Krivično procesno pravo, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd. Skulić, M. i Ilié, G. (2012) Novi Zakonik о krivičnom postupku Srbije- Како je propala reforma- Šta da se radi, Udruženje javnih tužilaca i zamenika javnih tužilaca Srbije, Beograd. Steele, D. (1992) From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge ofEconomic Calculation, Open Court Publishing Company Stevens, R. (2003) Reform in haste and repent at leisure: Iolanthe, the Lord High Executioner and Brave New World. Legal Studies, 1-2, pp. 1-34; Šulović, Z. (2010) Aktuelni status javnih tužilaca u Republici Srbiji, Uloga javnog tužioca u pravnom sistemu, sa posebnim osvrtom na problematiku efikasnosti krivičnog postupkai maloletničku
delinkvenciju, Udruženje jav nih tužilaca i zamenika javnih tužilaca Srbije, Beograd. Taranovski, F.V. (2003) Enciklopedija prava, Beograd. Thaman, S. (2011) Should Criminal Juries Give Reasons for Their Verdicts?: The Spanish Experience and the Implications of the European Court of Human Rights Decision in Taxquet V. Belgium. Chicago-Kent Law Review, voi. 86, no. 2. 613-668, available at: https://scholarship. kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?referer=https://www. google. rs/ httpsredii^l article=3797 context=cklawreview, pristupljeno 22. jula 2018. godine The European Charter on the statute forjudges DAJ/DOC(98)23 adopted in Strasbourg in July 1998. Universal Declaration on the Independence ofJustice, Unanimously ado pted at the final plenary session of the First World Conference on the Inde pendence of Justice held at Montreal (Quebec, Canada) on June 10th, 1983; Uzelac, A. (1992) Zavisnost i nezavisnost- prijedlozi uz položaj sudsdstva u Hrvatskoj. Zbornik Pravnogfakulteta u Zagrebu, 4, str. 575-594; Venice Commission, Rule of Law Checklist CDL-AD(2016)007, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 Mar ch 2016) Endorsed by the Ministers’ Deputies at the 1263th Meeting (6-7 September 2016) Endorsed by the Congress of Local and Regional Authori-
Dr Milica Kolaković - Bojović • 267 ties of the Council of Europe at its 31st Session (19-21 October 2016). Vrhovni kasacioni sud, Godišnji izveštaj о radu sudova u Republici Srbiji za 2017. godinu. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Kolaković-Bojović, Milica |
| author_facet | Kolaković-Bojović, Milica |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kolaković-Bojović, Milica |
| author_variant | m k b mkb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046045214 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1109127638 (DE-599)BVBBV046045214 |
| era | Geschichte 2013-2018 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 2013-2018 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046045214</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190711s2018 xx a||| |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788680756134</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-80756-13-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1109127638</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046045214</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kolaković-Bojović, Milica</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji</subfield><subfield code="b">reformski okvir i EU standardi</subfield><subfield code="c">Dr Milica Kolaković-Bojović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">270 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 261-267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text serbisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2013-2018</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Harmonisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125517-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Justiz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073136-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvereinheitlichung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048849-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Justizreform</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139503-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Justiz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073136-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Justizreform</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139503-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Harmonisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125517-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvereinheitlichung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048849-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2013-2018</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20190711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031426840</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Serbien |
| id | DE-604.BV046045214 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T13:12:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788680756134 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031426840 |
| oclc_num | 1109127638 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 270 Seiten Illustrationen |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20190711 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kolaković-Bojović, Milica Verfasser aut Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi Dr Milica Kolaković-Bojović Beograd Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja 2018. 270 Seiten Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverzeichnis Seite 261-267 Text serbisch Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 2013-2018 gnd rswk-swf Harmonisierung (DE-588)4125517-3 gnd rswk-swf Justiz (DE-588)4073136-4 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 gnd rswk-swf Justizreform (DE-588)4139503-7 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 g Justiz (DE-588)4073136-4 s Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Justizreform (DE-588)4139503-7 s Harmonisierung (DE-588)4125517-3 s Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 s Geschichte 2013-2018 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Kolaković-Bojović, Milica Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Harmonisierung (DE-588)4125517-3 gnd Justiz (DE-588)4073136-4 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 gnd Justizreform (DE-588)4139503-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4125517-3 (DE-588)4073136-4 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4048849-4 (DE-588)4139503-7 (DE-588)4054598-2 |
| title | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi |
| title_auth | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi |
| title_exact_search | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi |
| title_full | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi Dr Milica Kolaković-Bojović |
| title_fullStr | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi Dr Milica Kolaković-Bojović |
| title_full_unstemmed | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji reformski okvir i EU standardi Dr Milica Kolaković-Bojović |
| title_short | Organizacija pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |
| title_sort | organizacija pravosuda u republici srbiji reformski okvir i eu standardi |
| title_sub | reformski okvir i EU standardi |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Harmonisierung (DE-588)4125517-3 gnd Justiz (DE-588)4073136-4 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 gnd Justizreform (DE-588)4139503-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Harmonisierung Justiz Rechtsprechung Rechtsvereinheitlichung Justizreform Serbien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031426840&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kolakovicbojovicmilica organizacijapravosuđaurepublicisrbijireformskiokvirieustandardi |