Where economics went wrong: Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism
How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its wayMilton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong,...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton
Princeton University Press
[2019]
© 2019 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | EUV01 FAB01 FAW01 FCO01 FHA01 FKE01 FLA01 UBG01 UBM01 UBT01 UBY01 UPA01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its wayMilton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 267 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9780691184050 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9780691184050 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV045915774 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20231019 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190606s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780691184050 |c Online |9 978-0-691-18405-0 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780691184050 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691184050 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1102423809 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045915774 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-19 |a DE-860 |a DE-859 |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-1046 |a DE-473 |a DE-11 |a DE-1043 |a DE-521 |a DE-858 |a DE-706 |a DE-703 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 338.9 |2 23 | |
084 | |a QE 700 |0 (DE-625)141301: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a QD 110 |0 (DE-625)141285: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Colander, David C. |d 1947- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)123981263 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Where economics went wrong |b Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism |c David Colander and Craig Freedman |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton |b Princeton University Press |c [2019] | |
264 | 1 | |c © 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 267 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its wayMilton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative economics | |
650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
650 | 4 | |a Liberalism | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Chicago-Schule |g Wirtschaftswissenschaften |0 (DE-588)4127089-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kritik |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Neoliberalismus |0 (DE-588)4171438-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Neoliberalismus |0 (DE-588)4171438-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Chicago-Schule |g Wirtschaftswissenschaften |0 (DE-588)4127089-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Kritik |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Freedman, Craig |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)171245202 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-0-691-17920-9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031298279 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l EUV01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q EUV_EK_DEG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l FAB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l FCO01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l FKE01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l UBM01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBM_PDA_DGG_Kauf19 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050?locatt=mode:legacy |l UBT01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBT_Einzelkauf_2023 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l UBY01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804180091657256960 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Colander, David C. 1947- Freedman, Craig |
author_GND | (DE-588)123981263 (DE-588)171245202 |
author_facet | Colander, David C. 1947- Freedman, Craig |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Colander, David C. 1947- |
author_variant | d c c dc dcc c f cf |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV045915774 |
classification_rvk | QE 700 QD 110 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691184050 (OCoLC)1102423809 (DE-599)BVBBV045915774 |
dewey-full | 338.9 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 338 - Production |
dewey-raw | 338.9 |
dewey-search | 338.9 |
dewey-sort | 3338.9 |
dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9780691184050 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05058nmm a2200661zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045915774</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231019 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190606s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-691-18405-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780691184050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1102423809</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045915774</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">338.9</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QE 700</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141301:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QD 110</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141285:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colander, David C.</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)123981263</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Where economics went wrong</subfield><subfield code="b">Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism</subfield><subfield code="c">David Colander and Craig Freedman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">© 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xii, 267 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its wayMilton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liberalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Chicago-Schule</subfield><subfield code="g">Wirtschaftswissenschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127089-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033229-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Neoliberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4171438-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neoliberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4171438-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Chicago-Schule</subfield><subfield code="g">Wirtschaftswissenschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127089-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033229-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freedman, Craig</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)171245202</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-691-17920-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031298279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">EUV01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">EUV_EK_DEG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">FAB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">FCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">FKE01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">UBM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBM_PDA_DGG_Kauf19</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">UBT01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBT_Einzelkauf_2023</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">UBY01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV045915774 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:30:15Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780691184050 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031298279 |
oclc_num | 1102423809 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-860 DE-859 DE-Aug4 DE-1046 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-11 DE-1043 DE-521 DE-858 DE-706 DE-703 |
owner_facet | DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-860 DE-859 DE-Aug4 DE-1046 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-11 DE-1043 DE-521 DE-858 DE-706 DE-703 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 267 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG EUV_EK_DEG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBM_PDA_DGG_Kauf19 ZDB-23-DGG UBT_Einzelkauf_2023 ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Princeton University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Colander, David C. 1947- Verfasser (DE-588)123981263 aut Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism David Colander and Craig Freedman Princeton Princeton University Press [2019] © 2019 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 267 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its wayMilton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists Comparative economics Economic policy Liberalism Chicago-Schule Wirtschaftswissenschaften (DE-588)4127089-7 gnd rswk-swf Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd rswk-swf Neoliberalismus (DE-588)4171438-6 gnd rswk-swf Neoliberalismus (DE-588)4171438-6 s Chicago-Schule Wirtschaftswissenschaften (DE-588)4127089-7 s Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 s 1\p DE-604 Freedman, Craig Verfasser (DE-588)171245202 aut Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-0-691-17920-9 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Colander, David C. 1947- Freedman, Craig Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism Comparative economics Economic policy Liberalism Chicago-Schule Wirtschaftswissenschaften (DE-588)4127089-7 gnd Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd Neoliberalismus (DE-588)4171438-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4127089-7 (DE-588)4033229-9 (DE-588)4171438-6 |
title | Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism |
title_auth | Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism |
title_exact_search | Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism |
title_full | Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism David Colander and Craig Freedman |
title_fullStr | Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism David Colander and Craig Freedman |
title_full_unstemmed | Where economics went wrong Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism David Colander and Craig Freedman |
title_short | Where economics went wrong |
title_sort | where economics went wrong chicago s abandonment of classical liberalism |
title_sub | Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism |
topic | Comparative economics Economic policy Liberalism Chicago-Schule Wirtschaftswissenschaften (DE-588)4127089-7 gnd Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd Neoliberalismus (DE-588)4171438-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Comparative economics Economic policy Liberalism Chicago-Schule Wirtschaftswissenschaften Kritik Neoliberalismus |
url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691184050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colanderdavidc whereeconomicswentwrongchicagosabandonmentofclassicalliberalism AT freedmancraig whereeconomicswentwrongchicagosabandonmentofclassicalliberalism |