The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court:
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents i...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton
Princeton University Press
[2006]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FHA01 FKE01 FLA01 FUBA1 UBG01 UPA01 FAB01 FCO01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change. Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices' ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedent--that it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a "cloak" that never actually influences the Court--are incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices' decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 155 Seiten) Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9780691188041 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/9780691188041 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045879026 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191118 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190515s2006 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780691188041 |c Online |9 978-0-691-18804-1 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780691188041 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691188041 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1101922626 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045879026 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-739 |a DE-473 |a DE-1046 |a DE-188 |a DE-1043 |a DE-858 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73262 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a MG 70080 |0 (DE-625)122860:12045 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hansford, Thomas G. |d 1971- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1146800460 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court |c Thomas G. Hansford, James F. Spriggs II |
| 264 | 1 | |a Princeton |b Princeton University Press |c [2006] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2006 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 155 Seiten) |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change. Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices' ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedent--that it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a "cloak" that never actually influences the Court--are incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices' decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z United States |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stare decisis |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsanwendung |0 (DE-588)4048765-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Präzedenzfall |0 (DE-588)4175561-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidungsfindung |0 (DE-588)4113446-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Präzedenzfall |0 (DE-588)4175561-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Entscheidungsfindung |0 (DE-588)4113446-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtsanwendung |0 (DE-588)4048765-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Spriggs, James F. |d 1966- |0 (DE-588)1146265336 |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-0-691-12354-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 0-691-12354-3 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-0-691-13633-2 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031262203 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FAW01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FKE01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FLA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FUBA1 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q ZDB-23-DGG 2018 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l UBG01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l UPA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FAB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy |l FCO01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804180026274349056 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Hansford, Thomas G. 1971- Spriggs, James F. 1966- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1146800460 (DE-588)1146265336 |
| author_facet | Hansford, Thomas G. 1971- Spriggs, James F. 1966- |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Hansford, Thomas G. 1971- |
| author_variant | t g h tg tgh j f s jf jfs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045879026 |
| classification_rvk | MG 70080 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691188041 (OCoLC)1101922626 (DE-599)BVBBV045879026 |
| dewey-full | 347.73262 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73262 |
| dewey-search | 347.73262 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73262 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft Politologie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9780691188041 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04833nmm a2200649zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045879026</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191118 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190515s2006 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691188041</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-691-18804-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9780691188041</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780691188041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1101922626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045879026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73262</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 70080</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122860:12045</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hansford, Thomas G.</subfield><subfield code="d">1971-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1146800460</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="c">Thomas G. Hansford, James F. Spriggs II</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2006]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xii, 155 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change. Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices' ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedent--that it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a "cloak" that never actually influences the Court--are incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices' decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stare decisis</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsanwendung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048765-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Präzedenzfall</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4175561-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungsfindung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113446-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Präzedenzfall</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4175561-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungsfindung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113446-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsanwendung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048765-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spriggs, James F.</subfield><subfield code="d">1966-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1146265336</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-691-12354-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">0-691-12354-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-691-13633-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031262203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FKE01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FUBA1</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB-23-DGG 2018</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FAB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">FCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045879026 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:29:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780691188041 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031262203 |
| oclc_num | 1101922626 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-1046 DE-188 DE-1043 DE-858 |
| owner_facet | DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-1046 DE-188 DE-1043 DE-858 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 155 Seiten) Diagramme |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG 2018 ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Princeton University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Hansford, Thomas G. 1971- Verfasser (DE-588)1146800460 aut The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court Thomas G. Hansford, James F. Spriggs II Princeton Princeton University Press [2006] © 2006 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 155 Seiten) Diagramme txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change. Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices' ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedent--that it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a "cloak" that never actually influences the Court--are incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices' decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Law United States Interpretation and construction Political questions and judicial power United States Stare decisis United States Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 gnd rswk-swf Präzedenzfall (DE-588)4175561-3 gnd rswk-swf Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 gnd rswk-swf USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Präzedenzfall (DE-588)4175561-3 s Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 s Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 s DE-604 Spriggs, James F. 1966- (DE-588)1146265336 aut Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-0-691-12354-7 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 0-691-12354-3 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-0-691-13633-2 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Hansford, Thomas G. 1971- Spriggs, James F. 1966- The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Law United States Interpretation and construction Political questions and judicial power United States Stare decisis United States Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 gnd Präzedenzfall (DE-588)4175561-3 gnd Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4048765-9 (DE-588)4175561-3 (DE-588)4113446-1 |
| title | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court |
| title_auth | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court |
| title_exact_search | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court |
| title_full | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court Thomas G. Hansford, James F. Spriggs II |
| title_fullStr | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court Thomas G. Hansford, James F. Spriggs II |
| title_full_unstemmed | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court Thomas G. Hansford, James F. Spriggs II |
| title_short | The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court |
| title_sort | the politics of precedent on the u s supreme court |
| topic | USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Law United States Interpretation and construction Political questions and judicial power United States Stare decisis United States Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 gnd Präzedenzfall (DE-588)4175561-3 gnd Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | USA Supreme Court Law United States Interpretation and construction Political questions and judicial power United States Stare decisis United States Rechtsanwendung Präzedenzfall Entscheidungsfindung |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hansfordthomasg thepoliticsofprecedentontheussupremecourt AT spriggsjamesf thepoliticsofprecedentontheussupremecourt |