The company they keep: how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court
" Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? The intuitive response of most is "yes," and most point to trends in electoral politics as well as the nature of the relationship between the three branches of government. It is not that simple, howe...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [UK]
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | FUBA1 |
Zusammenfassung: | " Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? The intuitive response of most is "yes," and most point to trends in electoral politics as well as the nature of the relationship between the three branches of government. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Larry Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting to far more subtle social drivers than pressure from other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, by making use of social psychology, they examine why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. That is, the justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. The result is a court in which the justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Devins and Baum argue that today's partisanship on the Court is also tied to the emergence of the conservative legal network-a social network that reinforces the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For earlier Courts, elite social networks were not divided by political party or ideology, but for today's Court, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that bifurcation. A fascinating examination the factors that impact decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of the contemporary Supreme Court. "... ""The Company They Keep" advances a new way of thinking about Supreme Court decision-making. In so doing, it explains why today's Supreme Court is the first ever in which lines of ideological division are also partisan lines between justices appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents"... |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index. - Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (240 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9780190278069 9780190278076 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV045876591 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20190701 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190514s2019 xxk|||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
010 | |a 018022721 | ||
020 | |a 9780190278069 |9 978-0-19-027806-9 | ||
020 | |a 9780190278076 |9 978-0-19-027807-6 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1101920394 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045876591 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
049 | |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF8748 | |
082 | 0 | |a 347.7326 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Devins, Neal |d 1957- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132854945 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The company they keep |b how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court |c Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford [UK] |b Oxford University Press |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (240 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. - Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed | ||
520 | |a " Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? The intuitive response of most is "yes," and most point to trends in electoral politics as well as the nature of the relationship between the three branches of government. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Larry Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting to far more subtle social drivers than pressure from other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, by making use of social psychology, they examine why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. That is, the justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. The result is a court in which the justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Devins and Baum argue that today's partisanship on the Court is also tied to the emergence of the conservative legal network-a social network that reinforces the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For earlier Courts, elite social networks were not divided by political party or ideology, but for today's Court, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that bifurcation. A fascinating examination the factors that impact decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of the contemporary Supreme Court. "... | ||
520 | |a ""The Company They Keep" advances a new way of thinking about Supreme Court decision-making. In so doing, it explains why today's Supreme Court is the first ever in which lines of ideological division are also partisan lines between justices appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents"... | ||
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Supreme Court |x Decision making |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial process |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z United States | |
700 | 1 | |a Baum, Lawrence |d 1948- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132125420 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Devins, Neal, author |t Company they keep |d Oxford [UK] ; New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2019 |z 9780190278052 |
912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031259810 | ||
966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/fuberlin-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5626388 |l FUBA1 |p ZDB-30-PQE |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804180021978333184 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Devins, Neal 1957- Baum, Lawrence 1948- |
author_GND | (DE-588)132854945 (DE-588)132125420 |
author_facet | Devins, Neal 1957- Baum, Lawrence 1948- |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Devins, Neal 1957- |
author_variant | n d nd l b lb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV045876591 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF8748 |
callnumber-raw | KF8748 |
callnumber-search | KF8748 |
callnumber-sort | KF 48748 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1101920394 (DE-599)BVBBV045876591 |
dewey-full | 347.7326 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.7326 |
dewey-search | 347.7326 |
dewey-sort | 3347.7326 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03629nmm a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045876591</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190701 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190514s2019 xxk|||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">018022721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190278069</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-027806-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190278076</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-027807-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1101920394</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045876591</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8748</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.7326</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Devins, Neal</subfield><subfield code="d">1957-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132854945</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The company they keep</subfield><subfield code="b">how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="c">Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [UK]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (240 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index. - Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">" Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? The intuitive response of most is "yes," and most point to trends in electoral politics as well as the nature of the relationship between the three branches of government. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Larry Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting to far more subtle social drivers than pressure from other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, by making use of social psychology, they examine why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. That is, the justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. The result is a court in which the justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Devins and Baum argue that today's partisanship on the Court is also tied to the emergence of the conservative legal network-a social network that reinforces the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For earlier Courts, elite social networks were not divided by political party or ideology, but for today's Court, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that bifurcation. A fascinating examination the factors that impact decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of the contemporary Supreme Court. "...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">""The Company They Keep" advances a new way of thinking about Supreme Court decision-making. In so doing, it explains why today's Supreme Court is the first ever in which lines of ideological division are also partisan lines between justices appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="x">Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baum, Lawrence</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132125420</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Devins, Neal, author</subfield><subfield code="t">Company they keep</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [UK] ; New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2019</subfield><subfield code="z">9780190278052</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031259810</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/fuberlin-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5626388</subfield><subfield code="l">FUBA1</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV045876591 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:29:09Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780190278069 9780190278076 |
language | English |
lccn | 018022721 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031259810 |
oclc_num | 1101920394 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-188 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (240 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-30-PQE |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Devins, Neal 1957- Verfasser (DE-588)132854945 aut The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum Oxford [UK] Oxford University Press 2019 1 Online-Ressource (240 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index. - Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed " Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? The intuitive response of most is "yes," and most point to trends in electoral politics as well as the nature of the relationship between the three branches of government. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Larry Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting to far more subtle social drivers than pressure from other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, by making use of social psychology, they examine why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. That is, the justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. The result is a court in which the justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Devins and Baum argue that today's partisanship on the Court is also tied to the emergence of the conservative legal network-a social network that reinforces the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For earlier Courts, elite social networks were not divided by political party or ideology, but for today's Court, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that bifurcation. A fascinating examination the factors that impact decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of the contemporary Supreme Court. "... ""The Company They Keep" advances a new way of thinking about Supreme Court decision-making. In so doing, it explains why today's Supreme Court is the first ever in which lines of ideological division are also partisan lines between justices appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents"... United States Supreme Court Decision making Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States Baum, Lawrence 1948- Verfasser (DE-588)132125420 aut Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Devins, Neal, author Company they keep Oxford [UK] ; New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2019 9780190278052 |
spellingShingle | Devins, Neal 1957- Baum, Lawrence 1948- The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court United States Supreme Court Decision making Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States |
title | The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court |
title_auth | The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court |
title_exact_search | The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court |
title_full | The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum |
title_fullStr | The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum |
title_full_unstemmed | The company they keep how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum |
title_short | The company they keep |
title_sort | the company they keep how partisan divisions came to the supreme court |
title_sub | how partisan divisions came to the Supreme Court |
topic | United States Supreme Court Decision making Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States |
topic_facet | United States Supreme Court Decision making Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devinsneal thecompanytheykeephowpartisandivisionscametothesupremecourt AT baumlawrence thecompanytheykeephowpartisandivisionscametothesupremecourt |