Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy: how administrative law supports democratic government
"Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government explores the fundamental bases for the legitimacy of the modern administrative state. While some have argued that modern administrative states are a threat to liberty and at war with democr...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambrdige
Cambridge University Press
[2018]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government explores the fundamental bases for the legitimacy of the modern administrative state. While some have argued that modern administrative states are a threat to liberty and at war with democratic governance, Jerry L. Mashaw demonstrates that in fact reasoned administration is more respectful of rights and equal citizenship and truer to democratic values than lawmaking by either courts or legislatures. His account features the law's demand for reason giving and reasonableness as the crucial criterion for the legality of administrative action. In an argument combining history, sociology, political theory and law, this book demonstrates how administrative law's demand for reasoned administration structures administrative decision-making, empowers actors within and outside the government, and supports a complex vision of democratic self-rule"... "Preface and Acknowledgements Critiques of administrative governance go back at least to the Jeffersonian Republicans' objections to the creation of the First Bank of the United States. And, like those early "Democrats" laments, critical commentary is often focused on a presumed democratic deficit. For many, countering the pernicious effects of "big government", and re-establishing democracy and the rule of law, entails returning lawmaking to Congress and the judiciary. These complaints continue unabated in the academic literature, judicial decisions and popular political discourse. For example, conservative legalists have embraced Philip Hamburger's book, "Is Administrative Law Unlawful?" (answer yes) notwithstanding Hamburger's thoroughgoing misunderstanding of both modern American administrative law, and the functioning of seventeenth century royal prerogative to which Hamburger compared our modern administrative jurisprudence. No less than the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in with his own concerns the Americans now live in a gigantic and all-powerful administrative state. As these words are written multiple bills are before Congress that would, among other things, make all significant agency regulations ineffective unless specifically approved by Congress and instruct reviewing courts to give agency interpretations of their organic statutes no deference upon judicial review"... |
| Beschreibung: | IX, 201 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781108421003 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045562324 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190514 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190417s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 018031528 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108421003 |c Hardback |9 978-1-108-42100-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1101914011 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045562324 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-29 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF5407 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73/06 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Mashaw, Jerry L. |d 1941- |0 (DE-588)170543080 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy |b how administrative law supports democratic government |c Jerry L. Mashaw, Yale University |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambrdige |b Cambridge University Press |c [2018] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2018 | |
| 300 | |a IX, 201 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a "Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government explores the fundamental bases for the legitimacy of the modern administrative state. While some have argued that modern administrative states are a threat to liberty and at war with democratic governance, Jerry L. Mashaw demonstrates that in fact reasoned administration is more respectful of rights and equal citizenship and truer to democratic values than lawmaking by either courts or legislatures. His account features the law's demand for reason giving and reasonableness as the crucial criterion for the legality of administrative action. In an argument combining history, sociology, political theory and law, this book demonstrates how administrative law's demand for reasoned administration structures administrative decision-making, empowers actors within and outside the government, and supports a complex vision of democratic self-rule"... | ||
| 520 | |a "Preface and Acknowledgements Critiques of administrative governance go back at least to the Jeffersonian Republicans' objections to the creation of the First Bank of the United States. And, like those early "Democrats" laments, critical commentary is often focused on a presumed democratic deficit. For many, countering the pernicious effects of "big government", and re-establishing democracy and the rule of law, entails returning lawmaking to Congress and the judiciary. These complaints continue unabated in the academic literature, judicial decisions and popular political discourse. For example, conservative legalists have embraced Philip Hamburger's book, "Is Administrative Law Unlawful?" (answer yes) notwithstanding Hamburger's thoroughgoing misunderstanding of both modern American administrative law, and the functioning of seventeenth century royal prerogative to which Hamburger compared our modern administrative jurisprudence. No less than the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in with his own concerns the Americans now live in a gigantic and all-powerful administrative state. As these words are written multiple bills are before Congress that would, among other things, make all significant agency regulations ineffective unless specifically approved by Congress and instruct reviewing courts to give agency interpretations of their organic statutes no deference upon judicial review"... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Administrative agencies |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Administrative law |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Administrative procedure |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Legitimacy of governments |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rule of law |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Democracy |z United States | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-108-35582-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-108-41311-4 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030946076 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179546027589632 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Mashaw, Jerry L. 1941- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)170543080 |
| author_facet | Mashaw, Jerry L. 1941- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Mashaw, Jerry L. 1941- |
| author_variant | j l m jl jlm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045562324 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF5407 |
| callnumber-raw | KF5407 |
| callnumber-search | KF5407 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 45407 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1101914011 (DE-599)BVBBV045562324 |
| dewey-full | 342.73/06 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.73/06 |
| dewey-search | 342.73/06 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73 16 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03825nam a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045562324</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190514 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190417s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">018031528</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108421003</subfield><subfield code="c">Hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-42100-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1101914011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045562324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF5407</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73/06</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mashaw, Jerry L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1941-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)170543080</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy</subfield><subfield code="b">how administrative law supports democratic government</subfield><subfield code="c">Jerry L. Mashaw, Yale University</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambrdige</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IX, 201 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government explores the fundamental bases for the legitimacy of the modern administrative state. While some have argued that modern administrative states are a threat to liberty and at war with democratic governance, Jerry L. Mashaw demonstrates that in fact reasoned administration is more respectful of rights and equal citizenship and truer to democratic values than lawmaking by either courts or legislatures. His account features the law's demand for reason giving and reasonableness as the crucial criterion for the legality of administrative action. In an argument combining history, sociology, political theory and law, this book demonstrates how administrative law's demand for reasoned administration structures administrative decision-making, empowers actors within and outside the government, and supports a complex vision of democratic self-rule"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Preface and Acknowledgements Critiques of administrative governance go back at least to the Jeffersonian Republicans' objections to the creation of the First Bank of the United States. And, like those early "Democrats" laments, critical commentary is often focused on a presumed democratic deficit. For many, countering the pernicious effects of "big government", and re-establishing democracy and the rule of law, entails returning lawmaking to Congress and the judiciary. These complaints continue unabated in the academic literature, judicial decisions and popular political discourse. For example, conservative legalists have embraced Philip Hamburger's book, "Is Administrative Law Unlawful?" (answer yes) notwithstanding Hamburger's thoroughgoing misunderstanding of both modern American administrative law, and the functioning of seventeenth century royal prerogative to which Hamburger compared our modern administrative jurisprudence. No less than the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in with his own concerns the Americans now live in a gigantic and all-powerful administrative state. As these words are written multiple bills are before Congress that would, among other things, make all significant agency regulations ineffective unless specifically approved by Congress and instruct reviewing courts to give agency interpretations of their organic statutes no deference upon judicial review"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative agencies</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative procedure</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legitimacy of governments</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-35582-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-41311-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030946076</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045562324 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:21:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108421003 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 018031528 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030946076 |
| oclc_num | 1101914011 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 |
| physical | IX, 201 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Mashaw, Jerry L. 1941- (DE-588)170543080 aut Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government Jerry L. Mashaw, Yale University Cambrdige Cambridge University Press [2018] © 2018 IX, 201 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government explores the fundamental bases for the legitimacy of the modern administrative state. While some have argued that modern administrative states are a threat to liberty and at war with democratic governance, Jerry L. Mashaw demonstrates that in fact reasoned administration is more respectful of rights and equal citizenship and truer to democratic values than lawmaking by either courts or legislatures. His account features the law's demand for reason giving and reasonableness as the crucial criterion for the legality of administrative action. In an argument combining history, sociology, political theory and law, this book demonstrates how administrative law's demand for reasoned administration structures administrative decision-making, empowers actors within and outside the government, and supports a complex vision of democratic self-rule"... "Preface and Acknowledgements Critiques of administrative governance go back at least to the Jeffersonian Republicans' objections to the creation of the First Bank of the United States. And, like those early "Democrats" laments, critical commentary is often focused on a presumed democratic deficit. For many, countering the pernicious effects of "big government", and re-establishing democracy and the rule of law, entails returning lawmaking to Congress and the judiciary. These complaints continue unabated in the academic literature, judicial decisions and popular political discourse. For example, conservative legalists have embraced Philip Hamburger's book, "Is Administrative Law Unlawful?" (answer yes) notwithstanding Hamburger's thoroughgoing misunderstanding of both modern American administrative law, and the functioning of seventeenth century royal prerogative to which Hamburger compared our modern administrative jurisprudence. No less than the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in with his own concerns the Americans now live in a gigantic and all-powerful administrative state. As these words are written multiple bills are before Congress that would, among other things, make all significant agency regulations ineffective unless specifically approved by Congress and instruct reviewing courts to give agency interpretations of their organic statutes no deference upon judicial review"... Administrative agencies United States Administrative law United States Administrative procedure United States Legitimacy of governments United States Rule of law United States Democracy United States Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-108-35582-7 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-108-41311-4 |
| spellingShingle | Mashaw, Jerry L. 1941- Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government Administrative agencies United States Administrative law United States Administrative procedure United States Legitimacy of governments United States Rule of law United States Democracy United States |
| title | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government |
| title_auth | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government |
| title_exact_search | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government |
| title_full | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government Jerry L. Mashaw, Yale University |
| title_fullStr | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government Jerry L. Mashaw, Yale University |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government Jerry L. Mashaw, Yale University |
| title_short | Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy |
| title_sort | reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy how administrative law supports democratic government |
| title_sub | how administrative law supports democratic government |
| topic | Administrative agencies United States Administrative law United States Administrative procedure United States Legitimacy of governments United States Rule of law United States Democracy United States |
| topic_facet | Administrative agencies United States Administrative law United States Administrative procedure United States Legitimacy of governments United States Rule of law United States Democracy United States |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mashawjerryl reasonedadministrationanddemocraticlegitimacyhowadministrativelawsupportsdemocraticgovernment |