European constitutional language:
"If the task of constitutional theory is to set out a language in which the discourse of constitutional law may be grounded, a question of the utmost importance is how this terminology is created, defined and interpreted. In this groundbreaking new work, Andras Jakab maps out and analyses the g...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "If the task of constitutional theory is to set out a language in which the discourse of constitutional law may be grounded, a question of the utmost importance is how this terminology is created, defined and interpreted. In this groundbreaking new work, Andras Jakab maps out and analyses the grammar and vocabulary on which the core European traditions of constitutional theory are based. He suggests understanding key constitutional concepts as responses to historical and present day challenges experienced by European societies. Drawing together a great and diverse range of literature, much of which has never before been touched upon by scholarship in the English language, Jakab reconceptualises and argues for a new understanding of European constitutional law discourse. In so doing he shines new light on what constitutes its distinctively European nature. This remarkable book is essential reading for all scholars and students of constitutional theory in Europe and beyond"... |
| Beschreibung: | xvii, 511 pages |
| ISBN: | 9781107576926 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045562317 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20221116 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190417s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107576926 |c paperback |9 978-1-107-57692-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1101125659 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045562317 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-355 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a P119.32.E85 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.4001/4 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a HD 232 |0 (DE-625)48460: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PS 2580 |0 (DE-625)139722: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jakab, András |d 1978- |0 (DE-588)1044031506 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a European constitutional language |c András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a xvii, 511 pages | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a "If the task of constitutional theory is to set out a language in which the discourse of constitutional law may be grounded, a question of the utmost importance is how this terminology is created, defined and interpreted. In this groundbreaking new work, Andras Jakab maps out and analyses the grammar and vocabulary on which the core European traditions of constitutional theory are based. He suggests understanding key constitutional concepts as responses to historical and present day challenges experienced by European societies. Drawing together a great and diverse range of literature, much of which has never before been touched upon by scholarship in the English language, Jakab reconceptualises and argues for a new understanding of European constitutional law discourse. In so doing he shines new light on what constitutes its distinctively European nature. This remarkable book is essential reading for all scholars and students of constitutional theory in Europe and beyond"... | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Politik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sprache | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Language policy |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Language and languages |x Political aspects | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Sprache |0 (DE-588)4046559-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4127485-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sprachpolitik |0 (DE-588)4077732-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verfassungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4127485-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Sprachpolitik |0 (DE-588)4077732-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Politische Sprache |0 (DE-588)4046559-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030946070&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030946070 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179546008715264 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES PAGEXVI
PREFACE XVII
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AS A LANGUAGE SUGGESTION FOR A
CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE 2
1.2 THE POLITICAL NATURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY 4
1.3 THE ROLE OF HISTORICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 7
1.4 WHY EUROPEAN ? 9
PART
I THE GRAMMAR: THE RULES OF CONSTITUTIONAL
REASONING 11
2 CONSTITUTIONAL REASONING IN GENERAL 13
2.1 CONSTITUTIONAL REASONING AND CONSTITUTIONAL
INTERPRETATION 17
2.2 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND STATUTORY
INTERPRETATION 20
2.3 THE STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTS 23
2.4 THE NEED FOR CLARIFYING THE METHODS OF
INTERPRETATION 24
3 A SCHEME OF THE SPECIFIC METHODS OF INTERPRETATION 28
3.1 THE ORDINARY OR TECHNICAL MEANING OF THE WORDS 30
3.2 SYSTEMIC ARGUMENTS: ARGUMENTS FROM THE LEGAL
CONTEXT 32
VN
VLLL CONTENTS
3.2.1 CONTEXTUAL HARMONISING ARGUMENTS 32
3.2.2 REFERRING TO PRECEDENTS WHICH INTERPRET THE
CONSTITUTION 34
3.2.3 INTERPRETING THE CONSTITUTION IN THE LIGHT OF DOCTRINAL CONCEPTS
AND PRINCIPLES 40
3.2.4 ARGUMENTS FROM SILENCE 40
3.3 EVALUATING ARGUMENTS: ARGUMENTS FROM BEYOND THE LEGAL
CONTEXT 41
3.3.1 RELYING ON THE OBJECTIVE PURPOSE OF THE NORM 41
3.3.1.1 EXCURSUS ON A SPECIAL TYPE OF OBJECTIVE TELEOLOGICAL
INTERPRETATION: DWORKIN 44
3.3.1.2 OBJECTIONS TO OBJECTIVE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS AND
HOW TO RESPOND TO THEM 46
3.3.2 RELYING ON THE INTENTION OF THE CONSTITUTION-MAKER (SUBJECTIVE
TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS) 47
3.3.3 SUBSTANTIVE (NON-LEGAL: MORAL, SOCIOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC)
ARGUMENTS 51
3.4 FURTHER ARGUMENTS 53
3.4.1 REFERRING TO SCHOLARLY WORKS 53
3.4.2 ARGUMENTS FROM COMPARATIVE LAW 54
3.5 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE METHODS 57
3.6 CONCLUSION ON THE SUGGESTED METHOD OF CONSTITUTIONAL
INTERPRETATION 60
4 THE CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 62
4.1 COHERENCE 63
4.2 IN DEFENCE OF BEGRIFFSJURISPRUDENZ 64
4.3 TYPICAL MISTAKES WHEN BUILDING A CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM OF
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 67
5 DIALECTS OR LOCAL GRAMMARS: THE STYLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL
REASONING IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 70
5.1 AUSTRIA AND GERMANY: FOCUSING ON THE CONCEPTUAL
SYSTEM 71
5.2 FRANCE AND THE UK: LIMITED JUDICIAL REVIEW RESULTING IN
LIMITED CONCEPTUAL SOPHISTICATION 75
CONTENTS IX
5.3 HUNGARY AND SPAIN: COPYING THE GERMAN MODEL AFTER THE
END OF THE DICTATORSHIP 79
5.4 IS THERE A EUROPEAN STYLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL
REASONING? 82
PART II SUGGESTED VOCABULARY AS A PATCHWORK
HISTORICAL COLLECTION OF RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT
CHALLENGES 85
6 SOVEREIGNTY AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION 91
6.1 TAMING THE INTERNAL ASPECT OF SOVEREIGNTY: COMPROMISE
STRATEGIES IN NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS 92
6.2 TAMING THE EXTERNAL ASPECT: CHALLENGES TO INTERNATIONAL
LEGAL SOVEREIGNTY 100
6.3 MEMBER STATE ANSWERS TO (AND IGNORANCE OF) THE
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF EU MEMBERSHIP 104
6.4 FINDING A NEW COMPROMISE FORMULA BETWEEN NATIONAL
SOVEREIGNTY AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION 109
6.5 CONCLUSION AS TO HOW TO USE SOVEREIGNTY IN TODAY S
EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE 116
7 THE RULE OF LAW, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE TERRORIST
CHALLENGE IN EUROPE AND ELSEWHERE 117
7.1 THE ORIGINAL CHALLENGE TO WHICH THE RESPONSE WAS THE
RULE OF LAW: ABSOLUTISM 118
7.2 A CHALLENGE TODAY: TERRORISM 122
7.2.1 THE CONCEPT OF SECURITY 122
7.2.2 THE NATURE OF THE THREAT TO SECURITY 124
7.2.3 THE DILEMMA 124
7.2.3.1 FORMAL RULE OF LAW VS. SECURITY: THE CONSTITUTION AS A
GENERAL CONSTRAINT ON THE FIGHT AGAINST
TERRORISM 125
7.2.3.2 SUBSTANTIVE RULE OF LAW (FREEDOMS) VS. SECURITY: THE
TABOO OF TORTURE 129
7.3 OLD CHALLENGES VS. NEW CHALLENGES: REJECTING THE
REDEFINITION OF THE RULE OF LAW 141
CONTENTS
8 THE CONSTITUTION OF EUROPE 143
8.1 THE PRIMARY FUNCTION: LEGAL SELF-RESTRAINT OR A LIST OF
TABOOS 143
8.1.1 DIFFERENT MATERIAL CONCEPTS OF THE CONSTITUTION 151
8.1.2 CONSTITUTING VS. RESTRAINING? 153
8.1.3 RULES OF RATIONALITY AND DEFAULT RESPONSES 153
8.2 A SECONDARY FUNCTION: A SYMBOL OF THE
COMMUNITY 154
8.2.1 PREAMBLES 155
8.2.2 THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTION-MAKING? 157
8.3 CONSEQUENCES OF THE TWO FUNCTIONS 159
8.3.1 THE AMENDMENT PROCEDURE AND STABILITY 159
8.3.2 TYPICAL CONTENT 164
8.4 SHALL WE USE THE EXPRESSION THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION ? 166
9 DEMOCRACY IN EUROPE THROUGH PARLIAMENTARISATION 171
9.1 WHY DOES A SUCCESSFUL EU HAVE TO BE
DEMOCRATIC? 172
9.1.1 GENEALOGY: BIRTH IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY 173
9.1.2 THE SUCCESS STORY OF DEMOCRACY OR THE STRENGTH OF THE CLAIM
FOR DEMOCRACY 179
9.1.3 IS OUTPUT LEGITIMACY AN ALTERNATIVE? 183
9.2 CRITERIA FOR THE WELL-FUNCTIONING OF DEMOCRACY AND
THEIR FULFILMENT IN THE EU 185
9.2.1 A TECHNICAL-PROCEDURAL ISSUE: DIRECT OR REPRESENTATIVE
DEMOCRACY 185
9.2.2 POLITICAL FREEDOMS AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON
GOVERNMENT 187
9.2.3 STATEHOOD 188
9.2.4 NON-LEGAL POLITICAL AND SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 188
9.2.4.1 A HOMOGENEOUS DEMOS 188
9.2.4.2 POLITICAL IDENTITY OR THE EUROPEAN NATION 191
9.2.4.3 DEMOCRATIC MENTALITY 192
9.2.4.4 INTERESTED PUBLIC OPINION AND MEDIA
COVERAGE 193
CONTENTS XI
9.2.5 THE DIRECT LINK BETWEEN ELECTION AND RESPONSIBILITY: THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF POPULAR WILL 194
9.2.5.1 THE CURRENT SYSTEM IS DEMOCRATIC ENOUGH, AS WE
HAVE DEMOCRATIC EMPOWERMENT CHAINS LEADING TO THE
PEOPLE 195
9.2.5.2 THE EU HAS DEMOCRATIC ORIGINS, SO ITS FUNCTIONING
MUST BE DEMOCRATIC 196
9.2.5.3 WE SHOULD RATHER MAKE NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS
STRONGER 197
9.2.5.4 IT IS PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, AS MEMBER STATE
POLITICIANS WOULD NOT ALLOW IT 199
9.3 CONCLUSION AS TO HOW TO CONCEPTUALISE DEMOCRACY IN
EUROPE 203
10 CONSTITUTIONAL VISIONS OF THE NATION AND MULTI-ETHNIC
SOCIETIES IN EUROPE 205
10.1 HOW ETHNIC DIVERSITY BECOMES A CHALLENGE: THE NATION
AS A POLITICAL AND SOCIAL PHENOMENON 206
10.1.1 FACTORS HELPING THE FORMATION OF MODERN NATIONS 206
10.1.1.1 NATIONALISM ITSELF AS A POLITICAL IDEOLOGY HELPING
THE FORMATION OF NATIONS 207
10.1.1.2 THE SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS OF
INDIVIDUALS 210
10.1.1.2.1 THE NEED TO GIVE A MEANING TO LIFE AFTER
SECULARISATION 210
10.1.1.2.2 THE NEED FOR SOCIAL COHESION IN A
DYNAMICALLY CHANGING WORLD 212
10.1.1.3 POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
COMPARTMENTALISATION 213
10.1.1.3.1 COUNTRY-WIDE COMMUNICATION IN THE
VERNACULAR THROUGH LINGUISTIC
UNIFICATION 214
10.1.1.3.2 THE MODERN BUREAUCRATIC
STATE 218
10.1.1.3.3 FRAGMENTATION OF UNIVERSALIST
STRUCTURES 220
10.1.1.4 POLITICAL STRUGGLES AND WARS 221
10.1.1.5 SIDE-EFFECTS OF SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL
ADVANCEMENTS: CENSUS (STATISTICS), MAPS
(GEOGRAPHY), BILINGUAL DICTIONARIES (LINGUISTICS),
MUSEUMS (SCIENTIFIC HISTORY), SPORT (OLYMPIC
GAMES) 223
XLL CONTENTS
10.1.2 ANTINOMIES OF THE NATURE OF MODERN NATIONS 224
10.1.2.1 OLD VS. MODERN 225
10.1.2.2 NATURAL (ETHNIC, THAT IS, BASED ON ANCESTRY OR
CULTURE) VS. ARTIFICIAL (BASED ON ELITE
MANIPULATION; OR CIVIC, THAT IS, BASED ON LAW AND
DELIBERATE CHOICE) 228
10.1.2.3 BASED ON HISTORICAL FACTS VS. BASED ON FABRICATED
MYTHS 234
10.1.2.4 GROWING VS. FADING 236
10.1.2.5 CONSTRUCTIVE VS. DESTRUCTIVE 238
10.1.2.6 UNIVERSAL VS. LOCAL 241
10.2 FIVE DIFFERENT RESPONSES: CONSTITUTIONAL VISIONS
OF THE NATION 241
10.2.1 ONE STATE - ONE ETHNIC NATION: ASSIMILATION OR EXCLUSION
(VISION NO. I: CLASSICAL ETHNIC NATIONALIST VISION) 243
10.2.2 ONE STATE - ONE MULTI-ETHNIC NATION: THE NATION AS AN
EMOTIONAL ALLIANCE OF DIFFERENT ETHNIES (VISION NO. II:
SWITZERLAND) 247
10.2.3 ONE STATE - SEVERAL EQUAL ETHNIC NATIONS: THE STATE AS AN
EMPTY SHELL WITHOUT CLAIMING AN EMOTIONAL CONNECTION
BETWEEN THE ETHNIC COMMUNITIES (VISION NO. ILL:
BELGIUM) 249
10.2.4 ONE STATE - A DOMINANT ETHNIC NATION AND DIFFERENT
MINORITY ETHNIC GROUPS (VISION NO. IV: MOST
EUROPEAN STATES) 254
10.2.5 ONE STATE - NO ETHNIC NATION: THE CONCEPT OF A CIVIC NATION
(VISION NO. V: UNITED STATES) 258
10.2.6 SCHEDULE ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL VISIONS OF THE
NATION 263
10.3 DEBATED OR BORDERLINE CASES 263
10.3.1 SPAIN (MAINLY IV WITH ELEMENTS OF II AND III, BUT
HISTORICALLY ALSO 1) 273
10.3.2 SLOVAKIA, CROATIA AND ROMANIA (I AND IV) 275
10.3.3 THE UNITED KINGDOM (II, IV AND V) 276
10.3.4 HUNGARY (MAINLY IV, WITH ELEMENTS OF I AND V) 278
10.3.5 FRANCE AND POLAND (IV AND V, BUT HISTORICALLY
ALSO I) 281
10.4 EXCURSUS ON SECESSION: GIVING UP THE CONSTITUTIONAL
VISION 283
CONTENTS
10.5 THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE VISIONS OF A EUROPEAN
POLITICAL COMMUNITY 287
10.6 CONCLUSIONS AS TO THE USE OF NATION IN THE EUROPEAN
CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE 291
PART
IN REDUNDANT VOCABULARY 293
11 STAATSLEHRE AS CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY? 297
11.1 THE KEY CONCEPT OF THE STAATSLEHRE TRADITION: THE
STAAT 298
11.1.1 THE GERMAN STAATSLEHRE TRADITION 298
11.1.2 STAATSLEHRE AND THE CONCEPT OF STATE IN OTHER
COUNTRIES 302
11.2 ARGUMENTS ABOUT THE USEFULNESS OF STAATSLEHRE
TODAY 306
11.2.1 AN OBJECT-DEFINED DISCIPLINE WITH A COMPLEX
METHOD 306
11.2.2 STAATSLEHRE AS METHODOLOGICALLY UNCONTROLLED SOCIAL
SCIENCE BY LAWYERS 307
11.2.3 CONFUSION ABOUT THE KEY CONCEPT: THE STAAT 308
11.2.4 SOCIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OR UNIMPORTANCE OF THE STATE IN
THE AGE OF GLOBALISATION 310
11.2.5 LEGAL RELEVANCE OR IRRELEVANCE 311
11.2.5.1 STAATSLEHRE AS A CONCEPTUALISATION OF THE
SEPARATION OF STATE AND SOCIETY 312
11.2.5.2 PRIMACY OF THE STATE AGAINST THE
CONSTITUTION 313
11.3 PRE-LEGAL STATE VS. CONSTITUTION AS A KEY CONCEPT: THE
EXAMPLE OF THE STATE OF EMERGENCY 314
11.3.1 STATE-CENTRED THEORIES 314
11.3.1.1 CLASSICAL STATE-CENTRISM 315
11.3.1.2 MODERATE STATE-CENTRED THEORIES 318
11.3.2 CONSTITUTION-CENTRED THEORIES 319
11.3.2.1 THE CLASSICAL CONSTITUTION-CENTRISM 319
11.3.2.2 THE OPEN VERSION OF
CONSTITUTIONAL-CENTRISM 320
11.3.3 CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE CONCEPTUALISATION OF STATE OF
EMERGENCY 321
XIV CONTENTS
11.4 CONCLUSION ON THE USE OF THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF
STAATSLEHRE 323
12 THE STUFENBAULEHRE AS A BASIS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL
THEORY? 325
12.1 THE HIERARCHY OF THE LEGAL ORDER 326
12.1.1 THE STUFENBAULEHRE AS A CONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL
THEORY 327
12.1.2 POINTS OF CRITICISM 331
12.1.2.1 THE BASIC NORM 332
12.1.2.2 BLURRING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL AND
GENERAL ACTS 340
12.1.2.3 THE INDEFENSIBILITY OF MONISM 341
12.1.2.4 THE VALIDITY OF A NORM CONDITIONED BY ONE SINGLE
OTHER NORM 342
12.1.2.5 DERIVATION OF VALIDITY (EXISTENCE) OF A NORM IN
EXTREME EXAMPLES 345
12.1.2.6 DERIVATION OF VALIDITY (EXISTENCE) OF A NORM IN THE
CASE OF SIMPLE LEGISLATION 349
12.1.3 AN(?)OTHER HIERARCHY OF LEGAL ORDER 353
12.2 ANOTHER ATTEMPT OF THE PURE THEORY OF LAW TO
STRUCTURE LEGAL ORDER 357
12.3 EXCURSUS: THE UNDERLYING IDEOLOGY OF THE
STUFENBAULEHRE 361
12.3.1 AUTONOMY OF LAW 362
12.3.2 SEPARATION OF POWERS AND ACKNOWLEDGING
THE LEGAL NATURE OF GENERAL INTERNAL POLICIES
OF THE ADMINISTRATION 363
12.3.3 SECULARISED THEOLOGICAL CONCEPTIONS OF HIERARCHY 364
12.4 IS THE PURE THEORY OF LAW STILL ALIVE? 365
12.4.1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT 365
12.4.2 PERSPECTIVES OF THE PURE THEORY OF LAW 366
12.4.3 THE VIRTUES OF THE PURE THEORY OF LAW AND WHETHER
THEY CAN BE SAVED 366
13 PRINCIPLES AS NORMS LOGICALLY DISTINCT FROM RULES? 368
13.1 WHAT ARE PRINCIPLES? 368
13.1.1 ALEXY S THEORY 369
13.1.2 THE OBJECTION: SUPERFLUOUS CONCEPT 371
CONTENTS XV
13.1.3 POSSIBLE (COUNTER-)OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS PURELY
RULE-BASED PARADIGM 375
13.1.4 SO WHAT ARE PRINCIPLES? 377
13.2 HOW CAN PRINCIPLES BE ASCERTAINED
(RECOGNISED)? 380
13.3 WHAT IS THE FUNCTION OF PRINCIPLES? 381
13.3.1 HEURISTIC FUNCTION 381
13.3.2 PRACTICAL LEGAL FUNCTIONS IN APPLYING THE LAW 382
13.3.3 META-NORMATIVE FUNCTIONS 386
13.3.4 SOCIAL FUNCTIONS 386
14 PUBLIC LAW-PRIVATE LAW DIVIDE? 387
14.1 HISTORICAL ROOTS 388
14.2 THE DISTINCTION TODAY 390
14.2.1 PUBLIC LAW AND PRIVATE LAW AS CONCEPTS OF LEGAL
THEORY 390
14.2.1.1 INTEREST THEORY 390
14.2.1.2 SUBORDINATION THEORY 390
14.2.1.3 SUBJECT THEORY 392
14.2.1.4 TRUSTEESHIP THEORY 392
14.2.1.5 DISPOSITION THEORY 393
14.2.1.6 COMBINED THEORIES 393
14.2.2 PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC LAW AS POSITIVE-LAW
CONCEPTS 394
14.3 WHAT COULD BE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE BEHIND THE
DISTINCTION? 396
14.4 FURTHER POSSIBLE MEANINGS OF PUBLIC LAW AND PRIVATE
LAW 397
14.5 SHOULD WE USE THE CONCEPTS PUBLIC LAW AND PRIVATE
LAW IN EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE? 398
PART IV CONCLUDING REMARKS 401
BIBLIOGRAPHY 403
INDEX 487
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Jakab, András 1978- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1044031506 |
| author_facet | Jakab, András 1978- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Jakab, András 1978- |
| author_variant | a j aj |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045562317 |
| callnumber-first | P - Language and Literature |
| callnumber-label | P119 |
| callnumber-raw | P119.32.E85 |
| callnumber-search | P119.32.E85 |
| callnumber-sort | P 3119.32 E85 |
| callnumber-subject | P - Philology and Linguistics |
| classification_rvk | HD 232 PS 2580 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1101125659 (DE-599)BVBBV045562317 |
| dewey-full | 342.4001/4 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.4001/4 |
| dewey-search | 342.4001/4 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.4001 14 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03150nam a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045562317</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20221116 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190417s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107576926</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-57692-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1101125659</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045562317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P119.32.E85</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.4001/4</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HD 232</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)48460:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2580</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139722:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jakab, András</subfield><subfield code="d">1978-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1044031506</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">European constitutional language</subfield><subfield code="c">András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xvii, 511 pages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"If the task of constitutional theory is to set out a language in which the discourse of constitutional law may be grounded, a question of the utmost importance is how this terminology is created, defined and interpreted. In this groundbreaking new work, Andras Jakab maps out and analyses the grammar and vocabulary on which the core European traditions of constitutional theory are based. He suggests understanding key constitutional concepts as responses to historical and present day challenges experienced by European societies. Drawing together a great and diverse range of literature, much of which has never before been touched upon by scholarship in the English language, Jakab reconceptualises and argues for a new understanding of European constitutional law discourse. In so doing he shines new light on what constitutes its distinctively European nature. This remarkable book is essential reading for all scholars and students of constitutional theory in Europe and beyond"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Language policy</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Language and languages</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046559-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127485-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sprachpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077732-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verfassungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127485-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Sprachpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077732-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politische Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046559-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030946070&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030946070</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV045562317 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:21:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107576926 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030946070 |
| oclc_num | 1101125659 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | xvii, 511 pages |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Jakab, András 1978- (DE-588)1044031506 aut European constitutional language András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg) Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2018 xvii, 511 pages txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "If the task of constitutional theory is to set out a language in which the discourse of constitutional law may be grounded, a question of the utmost importance is how this terminology is created, defined and interpreted. In this groundbreaking new work, Andras Jakab maps out and analyses the grammar and vocabulary on which the core European traditions of constitutional theory are based. He suggests understanding key constitutional concepts as responses to historical and present day challenges experienced by European societies. Drawing together a great and diverse range of literature, much of which has never before been touched upon by scholarship in the English language, Jakab reconceptualises and argues for a new understanding of European constitutional law discourse. In so doing he shines new light on what constitutes its distinctively European nature. This remarkable book is essential reading for all scholars and students of constitutional theory in Europe and beyond"... Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Politik Sprache Language policy European Union countries Language and languages Political aspects Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd rswk-swf Sprachpolitik (DE-588)4077732-7 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 s Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 s Sprachpolitik (DE-588)4077732-7 s Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 s DE-604 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030946070&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Jakab, András 1978- European constitutional language Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Politik Sprache Language policy European Union countries Language and languages Political aspects Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 gnd Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd Sprachpolitik (DE-588)4077732-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4046559-7 (DE-588)4127485-4 (DE-588)4062801-2 (DE-588)4077732-7 |
| title | European constitutional language |
| title_auth | European constitutional language |
| title_exact_search | European constitutional language |
| title_full | European constitutional language András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg) |
| title_fullStr | European constitutional language András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg) |
| title_full_unstemmed | European constitutional language András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg) |
| title_short | European constitutional language |
| title_sort | european constitutional language |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Politik Sprache Language policy European Union countries Language and languages Political aspects Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 gnd Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd Sprachpolitik (DE-588)4077732-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Politik Sprache Language policy European Union countries Language and languages Political aspects Politische Sprache Verfassungstheorie Verfassungsrecht Sprachpolitik Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030946070&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jakabandras europeanconstitutionallanguage |