Liberal legality: a unified theory of our law
"In his new book, Lewis D. Sargentich shows how two different kinds of legal argument - rule-based reasoning and reasoning based on principles and policies - share a surprising kinship and serve the same aspiration. He starts with the study of the rule of law in life, a condition of law that se...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore
Cambridge University Press
[2018]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "In his new book, Lewis D. Sargentich shows how two different kinds of legal argument - rule-based reasoning and reasoning based on principles and policies - share a surprising kinship and serve the same aspiration. He starts with the study of the rule of law in life, a condition of law that serves liberty - here called liberal legality. In pursuit of liberal legality, courts work to uphold people's legal entitlements and to confer evenhanded legal justice. Judges try to achieve the control of reason in law, which is manifest in law's coherence, and to avoid forms of arbitrariness, such as personal moral judgment. Sargentich offers a unified theory of the diverse ways of doing law, and shows that they all arise from the same root, which is a commitment to liberal legality"... "Legality is our topic. According to the vocabulary I use in this essay, legality is law's aspiration. It is law's excellence, a sought condition of law. When legality is realized, a regime of law exists in social life. What I am calling liberal legality, in particular, is a regime of law that helps to secure liberty. In this essay, liberal law is so called because it aspires to achieve a condition of lawfulness that is prized by a political position that prizes equal liberty"... |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 169-170) and index |
| Beschreibung: | xii, 176 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781108425452 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045510409 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191119 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190313s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 017050594 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108425452 |c hardback |9 978-1-108-42545-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1033917216 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045510409 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-29 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K230.S2549 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 340/.11 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Sargentich, Lewis D. |d 1944- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1176985027 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Liberal legality |b a unified theory of our law |c Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore |b Cambridge University Press |c [2018] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2019 | |
| 300 | |a xii, 176 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 169-170) and index | ||
| 520 | |a "In his new book, Lewis D. Sargentich shows how two different kinds of legal argument - rule-based reasoning and reasoning based on principles and policies - share a surprising kinship and serve the same aspiration. He starts with the study of the rule of law in life, a condition of law that serves liberty - here called liberal legality. In pursuit of liberal legality, courts work to uphold people's legal entitlements and to confer evenhanded legal justice. Judges try to achieve the control of reason in law, which is manifest in law's coherence, and to avoid forms of arbitrariness, such as personal moral judgment. Sargentich offers a unified theory of the diverse ways of doing law, and shows that they all arise from the same root, which is a commitment to liberal legality"... | ||
| 520 | |a "Legality is our topic. According to the vocabulary I use in this essay, legality is law's aspiration. It is law's excellence, a sought condition of law. When legality is realized, a regime of law exists in social life. What I am calling liberal legality, in particular, is a regime of law that helps to secure liberty. In this essay, liberal law is so called because it aspires to achieve a condition of lawfulness that is prized by a political position that prizes equal liberty"... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a LAW / Jurisprudence / bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |x Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rule of law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LAW / Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzmäßigkeit |0 (DE-588)4157109-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4048821-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsstaatsprinzip |0 (DE-588)4122326-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rechtsphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4048821-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsstaatsprinzip |0 (DE-588)4122326-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gesetzmäßigkeit |0 (DE-588)4157109-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-108-67386-0 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030894924&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030894924 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179453398482944 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents
Preface: Law s Quest Page x*
Introduction: Toward Unification 1
o.i Formative Commitment 4
o.2 Commitment Unfolds 6
0.3 Unified Understanding 7
0.4 Our Legal Practice 9
1 The Idea of Law-Like Law 12
1.1 Nomological Legality *3
1.2 Entrenched Aspiration *5
2 Argument in a Legal System 18
2.1 Features of a Legal System *9
2.2 Canons of Argument 21
2.3 What Follows 25
3 Practice of Legality z7
3.1 Instituted Discourse 29
3.2 Entrenched Pursuit 33
3.3 Self-Conception 39
4 Pursuit of the Rule of Law 44
4.1 Formal and Substantive Justice 45
4.2 Our Vocabulary 52
Vll
Contents
viii
5 Aspiration and Impulse 53
5.1 Nomological Legality 56
5.2 Liberal Commitment 64
5.3 Fa ilure of Legality 71
5.4 Dual Impulse 77
6 Deep Duality: Formal Law 88
6.1 Rawls First View of Law 90
6.2 A Contrary View 93
6.3 Law-Like Formality: Weber 96
6.4 Half-Right Views 102
7 Deep Duality: Law s Ideals 105
7.1 A Contrary View 106
7.2 Law-Like Ideals: Dworkin 108
7.3 Halves of a Whole 114
7.4 Rawls Second View of Law 116
8 Two Perils for Law 120
8.1 Liberal Law s Fears 121
8.2 Overcoming Peril 122
8.3 Deeper Danger 126
8.4 What Follows 129
9 Fear of Free Ideals 131
9.1 Warring Creeds 132
9.2 Moral Skepticism x35
9.3 What s Feared x39
10 Fear of Open Form 142
10.1 Unsure Concepts H3
10.2 Linguistic Skepticism HI
10.3 What s Feared 150
u Modern Liberal Practice *53
11.1 Practice s View of Law *54
11.2 Two Views of Disorder 156
11.3 Implications of Disorder x59
Contents
IX
12 Legality Recapitulated 162
12.1 Pattern in Complexity 163
12.2 The Big Pattern 166
12.3 Unanswered Questions 167
References 169
Index 171
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Sargentich, Lewis D. 1944- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1176985027 |
| author_facet | Sargentich, Lewis D. 1944- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Sargentich, Lewis D. 1944- |
| author_variant | l d s ld lds |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045510409 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K230 |
| callnumber-raw | K230.S2549 |
| callnumber-search | K230.S2549 |
| callnumber-sort | K 3230 S2549 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1033917216 (DE-599)BVBBV045510409 |
| dewey-full | 340/.11 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.11 |
| dewey-search | 340/.11 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 211 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03292nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045510409</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191119 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190313s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">017050594</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108425452</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-42545-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1033917216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045510409</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K230.S2549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.11</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sargentich, Lewis D.</subfield><subfield code="d">1944-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1176985027</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liberal legality</subfield><subfield code="b">a unified theory of our law</subfield><subfield code="c">Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 176 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 169-170) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In his new book, Lewis D. Sargentich shows how two different kinds of legal argument - rule-based reasoning and reasoning based on principles and policies - share a surprising kinship and serve the same aspiration. He starts with the study of the rule of law in life, a condition of law that serves liberty - here called liberal legality. In pursuit of liberal legality, courts work to uphold people's legal entitlements and to confer evenhanded legal justice. Judges try to achieve the control of reason in law, which is manifest in law's coherence, and to avoid forms of arbitrariness, such as personal moral judgment. Sargentich offers a unified theory of the diverse ways of doing law, and shows that they all arise from the same root, which is a commitment to liberal legality"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Legality is our topic. According to the vocabulary I use in this essay, legality is law's aspiration. It is law's excellence, a sought condition of law. When legality is realized, a regime of law exists in social life. What I am calling liberal legality, in particular, is a regime of law that helps to secure liberty. In this essay, liberal law is so called because it aspires to achieve a condition of lawfulness that is prized by a political position that prizes equal liberty"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Jurisprudence / bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liberalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzmäßigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4157109-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstaatsprinzip</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122326-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstaatsprinzip</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122326-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gesetzmäßigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4157109-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-67386-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030894924&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030894924</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045510409 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:20:06Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108425452 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 017050594 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030894924 |
| oclc_num | 1033917216 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-29 |
| physical | xii, 176 Seiten 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Sargentich, Lewis D. 1944- Verfasser (DE-588)1176985027 aut Liberal legality a unified theory of our law Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore Cambridge University Press [2018] © 2019 xii, 176 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (pages 169-170) and index "In his new book, Lewis D. Sargentich shows how two different kinds of legal argument - rule-based reasoning and reasoning based on principles and policies - share a surprising kinship and serve the same aspiration. He starts with the study of the rule of law in life, a condition of law that serves liberty - here called liberal legality. In pursuit of liberal legality, courts work to uphold people's legal entitlements and to confer evenhanded legal justice. Judges try to achieve the control of reason in law, which is manifest in law's coherence, and to avoid forms of arbitrariness, such as personal moral judgment. Sargentich offers a unified theory of the diverse ways of doing law, and shows that they all arise from the same root, which is a commitment to liberal legality"... "Legality is our topic. According to the vocabulary I use in this essay, legality is law's aspiration. It is law's excellence, a sought condition of law. When legality is realized, a regime of law exists in social life. What I am calling liberal legality, in particular, is a regime of law that helps to secure liberty. In this essay, liberal law is so called because it aspires to achieve a condition of lawfulness that is prized by a political position that prizes equal liberty"... LAW / Jurisprudence / bisacsh Law Philosophy Rule of law Liberalism LAW / Jurisprudence Gesetzmäßigkeit (DE-588)4157109-5 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsstaatsprinzip (DE-588)4122326-3 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 s Rechtsstaatsprinzip (DE-588)4122326-3 s Gesetzmäßigkeit (DE-588)4157109-5 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-108-67386-0 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030894924&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Sargentich, Lewis D. 1944- Liberal legality a unified theory of our law LAW / Jurisprudence / bisacsh Law Philosophy Rule of law Liberalism LAW / Jurisprudence Gesetzmäßigkeit (DE-588)4157109-5 gnd Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd Rechtsstaatsprinzip (DE-588)4122326-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4157109-5 (DE-588)4048821-4 (DE-588)4122326-3 |
| title | Liberal legality a unified theory of our law |
| title_auth | Liberal legality a unified theory of our law |
| title_exact_search | Liberal legality a unified theory of our law |
| title_full | Liberal legality a unified theory of our law Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School |
| title_fullStr | Liberal legality a unified theory of our law Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School |
| title_full_unstemmed | Liberal legality a unified theory of our law Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School |
| title_short | Liberal legality |
| title_sort | liberal legality a unified theory of our law |
| title_sub | a unified theory of our law |
| topic | LAW / Jurisprudence / bisacsh Law Philosophy Rule of law Liberalism LAW / Jurisprudence Gesetzmäßigkeit (DE-588)4157109-5 gnd Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd Rechtsstaatsprinzip (DE-588)4122326-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | LAW / Jurisprudence / bisacsh Law Philosophy Rule of law Liberalism LAW / Jurisprudence Gesetzmäßigkeit Rechtsphilosophie Rechtsstaatsprinzip |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030894924&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sargentichlewisd liberallegalityaunifiedtheoryofourlaw |