Aristotle's method in ethics: philosophy in practice
"This book examines Aristotle's method in ethics. Let me be clear that I do not think that Aristotle has an ethical "method" in the sense of a mechanical decision procedure for seeking ethical knowledge which eliminates the need for creative insight and judgment. In fact, his rel...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Literaturverzeichnis Register // Sachregister |
| Zusammenfassung: | "This book examines Aristotle's method in ethics. Let me be clear that I do not think that Aristotle has an ethical "method" in the sense of a mechanical decision procedure for seeking ethical knowledge which eliminates the need for creative insight and judgment. In fact, his reliance upon judgment in his ethical inquiries, and philosophical inquiries more generally, is a major theme of this book"-- |
| Beschreibung: | xii, 275 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781108419598 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045435434 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210906 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190131s2019 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108419598 |c hardback |9 978-1-108-41959-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1088317077 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045435434 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-20 |a DE-M468 |a DE-12 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Karbowski, Joseph |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1178449890 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aristotle's method in ethics |b philosophy in practice |c Joseph Karbowski, University of Pittsburgh |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore |b Cambridge University Press |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a xii, 275 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The dialectical orthodoxy -- Dialectical reasoning and the dialectical craft -- The enterprise of philosophy -- Aristotle's scientific and flexible philosophical method -- Method in the Eudemian ethics -- Ethical precision and the practical necessity of episteme -- Facts, principles, and Aristotle's demonstrative ethical science -- Strategic flexibility in the Nicomachean ethics -- The autonomy of ethics | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "This book examines Aristotle's method in ethics. Let me be clear that I do not think that Aristotle has an ethical "method" in the sense of a mechanical decision procedure for seeking ethical knowledge which eliminates the need for creative insight and judgment. In fact, his reliance upon judgment in his ethical inquiries, and philosophical inquiries more generally, is a major theme of this book"-- | |
| 600 | 0 | 7 | |a Aristoteles |d v384-v322 |0 (DE-588)118650130 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 1 | |a Aristotle | |
| 653 | 1 | |a Aristotle | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Ethics, Ancient | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Ethics, Ancient | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Aristotelis Ethica Eudemica |0 (DE-2581)TH000000343 |2 gbd | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea |0 (DE-2581)TH000000344 |2 gbd | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-2581)TH000006651 |2 gbd | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Aristoteles |d v384-v322 |0 (DE-588)118650130 |D p |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-108-41145-5 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Sachregister |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |n gbd | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20191108 | |
| 940 | 1 | |q gbd_4_2107 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030821053 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09014 |g 38 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179325876961280 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Bibliography Achard, M. (2005). Epistémologie et pratique de la science chez Aristote. Paris. Achtenberg, D. (2002). Cognition of Value in Aristotle’s Ethics: Promise of Enrichment, Threat ofDestruction. New York. Adorili, J. L. (1981). “Aristode’s theory of definition: Some questions on Posterior Analytics II.8-10.” In E. Berti (ed.), Aristotle on Science, Padua, 359-88. Adkins, A. W. H. (1991). “The connection between Aristode’s ethics and politics.” In D. Keyt and F. D. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford, 75-93. Allan, D. J. (1961). “Quasi-mathematical method in the Eudemian Ethics.” In S. Mansion (ed.), Aristote et les Problèmes de Méthode, Louvain, 303-18. (1963—4). “Aristode’s criticisms of Platonic doctrine concerning goodness and the good.” Proceedings ofthe Aristotelian Society 64, 273-86. Allen, J. V. (2015). “Practical and theoretical knowledge in Aristotle.” In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristode’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 49-70. Anagnostopoulos, G. (1994). Aristotle on the Goals andExactness ofEthics. Berkeley. Angioni, L. (2016). “Aristotle’s definition of scientific knowledge (7ib9-i2).” Logical Analysis and History ofPhilosophy 19,140-66. (2017). “Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics 1.6.” Archai 20,191-229. Baime, D. (1972). Aristotle’s De Partibtts Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I {with passagesfrom II.1-3). Oxford. Barnes, J. (1975). “Aristotle’s theory of demonstration.” In J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle vol. I: Science, London, 65-87.
(Originally in Phronesis 14 (1969), 123-52.) (1981). “Aristode and the methods of ethics.” Revue Internationale de և Philosophie 34, 490-511. (1993). Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Second Edition, Oxford. (2011). “Philosophy and dialectic.” In M. Bonelli (ed.), Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I (Jonathan Barnes), Oxford, 164—73. Barney, R. (2008). “Aristode’s argument for a human fimction.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34, 293-322. Bayer, G. (1995). “Definition through demonstration: The two types of syllogisms in Posterior Analytics II.8.” Phronesis 40, 241-64. 249
շյօ Bibliography Berti, E. (1983). “La fimction de Métaphysique Alpha Efatton dans la philosophie d’Aristote.” In P. Moraux and J. Wiesner (eds.), Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelkum, Berlin, 260—94. (1996). “Does Aristode’s conception of dialectic develop?” In W. Wians (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Lanham, 105-30. (2005). “The Aristotelian endoxa as a basis for modern reasonableness.” In К Dottori (ed.), Reason and Reasonableness/Vernunfi und Vernünftigkeit, Münster, 177-90. Bobonich, C. (2006). “Aristotle’s ethical treatises.” In R. Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford, 12-36. Bodéüs, R. (1993). The Political Dimensions ofAristotle’s Ethics. Albany. Bolton, R. (1976). “Essentialism and semantic theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II.7—10.” Philosophical Review 85, 514—44. (1978). “Aristode’s definitions of the soul: De Anima II, 1-3.” Phronesis 23, 258-78. (1987). “Definitions in the Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle ’s Biology, Cambridge, 120—66. (1991a). “Aristotle on the objectivity of ethics.” In J. P. Anton and A. Preus (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy II, Albany, 7—28. (1991b). “Aristode’s method in natural science: Physics In L. Judson (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection ofEssays, Oxford, 1—29. (1994a). “The problem of dialectical syllogismes.” Ancient Philosophy 14, 99-132. (1994b). “Aristode’s conception of metaphysics as a science.” In T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, and M. L. Gill
(eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle ’s Metaphysics, Oxford, 321—54. (1996). “Science and the science of substance in Aristode’s Metaphysics Z.” In F. Lewis and R. Bolton (eds.), Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle, Oxford, 231-80. (1997). “The material cause: Matter and explanation in Aristode’s natural science.” In W. Kullmann and S. Föllinger (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 97—126. (1999). “The epistemological basis of Aristotelian dialectic.” In M. Sim (ed.), From Puzzles to PrincipUs? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham, 57-105· (2009). “Two standards for inquiry in Aristotle’s De Cáelo.” In A. C. Bowen and C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Саек, Leiden, 51-82. (2012). “The Aristotelian elenchus.” In J. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialecticfrom PUto to Aristotle, Cambridge, 270-95. Bonitz, H. (1870). Index Aristoteļiem. Berlin. Bostock, D. (2000). Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford. Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Amtotle. Oxford. Broadie, S. and C. J. Rowe. (2002). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford.
Bibliography 251 Bronstein, D. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford. Brown, L. (1997). “What is ‘the mean relative to us’ in Aristotle’s Ethics?” Phronesis 42, 77-93. (2009). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W. D. Ross. Revised with an Introduction and Notes by L. Brown, Oxford. Brunschwig, J. (1967). Aristote: Topiques Livres I—IV. Paris. (1984—5). “Aristotle on arguments without winners or losers.” Wissenschafts Jahrbuch, 31—40. (1990). “Remarques sur la communication de Robert Bolton.” In D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 237-61. (2007). Aristote: Topiques Livres V—VLII. Paris. Burnet, J. (1900). The Ethics ofAristotle. London. Burnyeat, M. F. (1980). “Aristode on learning to be good.” In A. O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, Berkeley, 69-92. (1981). “Aristode on understanding knowledge.” In E. Berti (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, Padua, 97—139. (2000). “Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul.” Proceedings of the British Academy 103,1-81. (2001). A Map ofMetaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh. (2011). “Episteme.” In B. Morison and K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour ofJonathan Bames, Oxford, 3—29. Charles, D. (1990). “Aristotle on meaning, natural kinds and natural history.” In D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 145-67. (1995). “Aristode and modem realism.” In R. Heinaman (ed.), Aristotle and Moral
Realam, Boulder, 135—72. (2000). Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford. (2012). “Definition and explanation in the Posterior Analytics and Metaphysics.” In D. Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford, 286—328. (2015). “Aristotle on practical and theoredcal knowledge.” In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 71—93. Code, A. (1986). “Aristode’s investigation of a basic logical principle: Which science investigates the principle of non-contradiction?” Canadian Journal ofPhilosophy 16, 341-57. (1997). “Aristode’s metaphysics as a science of principles.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51, 345-66. Cooper, J. M. (1975). Reason and Human Good in Aristode. Cambridge. (2004). “Plato and Aristotle on ‘finality’ and ‘(self-)sufficiency’.” In J. Cooper, (ed.) Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton, 270—308. (Originally in R. Heinaman (ed.), Plato and Aristotle’s Ethics, London, 117-47.)
2¿z Bibliography (2009). “Nicomachean Ethics VII.1-2: Introduction, method, puzzles.” In C. Natali (ed.), Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book VII, Oxford, 9-39. (2010). “Political community and the highest good.” In J. G. Lennox and R. Bolton (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honour of Alkn Gotthelf Cambridge, 212-64. (2013). “Aristotelian responsibility.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45, 263-312. DaVia, C. (2016). “Universality in Aristotle’s ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54,181-201. Demoss, D. and D. Devereux. (1988). “Essence, existence, and nominal definition in Aristode’s Posterior Analytics II.8.” Phronesis 33,133-54. De Pater, W. (1965). Les Topiques ď Aristote et la dialectique pUtonicienne, Fribourg. Detel, W. A. (1997). “Why all animals have a stomach. Demonstration and axiomatization in Aristotle’s Part of AnimaL·.” In W. Kullmann and S. Föllinger (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 63-84. Devereux, D. (1986). “Particular and universal in Aristotle’s conception of prac tical knowledge.” The Review ofMetaphysics 39, 483—504. (1990). “Comments on Robert Bolton.” In D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 263-86. (2015). “Scientific and ethical methods İn Aristode’s Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics,” In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 130-47. Dirlmeier, F. (1962). Eudemische Ethik, übersetzt und kommentiert. Berlin. Distelzweig, P. M. (2013). “The
intersection of mathematical and natural sciences: The subordinate sciences in Aristotle.” Apeiron 46, 85-105. Düring, I. (i960). “Aristotle on ultimate principles from ‘nature and reality’: Protrepticus fr. 13.” In I. Diking and G. E. L. Owen (eds.), Aristotle and PUto in the Mid-Fourth Century, Göteborg, 35—55. Evans, J. D. G. (1977). Aristotle’s Concept ofDialectic. Cambridge. Fait, P. (2007). La confutazioni sofistiche. Laterza. Falcon, A. and M. Leunissen. (2015). “The scientific role of Eulogos in Aristotle’s Cael II 12.” In D. Ebrey (ed.), Theory and Practice in AristotU’s Natural Science, Cambridge, 217-40. Ferejohn, M. (1991). The Origins ofAristotelian Science. New Haven. (2013). Formal Causes: Definition, Explanation, and Primacy in Socratic and Aristotelian Thought. Oxford. Frede D. (2012). “The endoxon mystique: What endoxa are and what they are not.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43,185-215. (2013). “The political character of Aristode’s ethics.” In M. Deslauriers and P. Destrée (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Cambridge, 14-37. Frede, M. (1987). “The unity of special and general metaphysics.” In M. Frede (ed.), Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis, 81—95.
Bibliography 253 (2004). “Aristotle’s account of the origins of philosophy.” Rhizai 1, 9-44. Gigon, O. (1971). “Das Prooimion der Eudemischen Ethik.” In P. Moraux and D. Harlfinger (eds.), Untersuchungen zur Eudemischen Ethik, Berlin, 93-133. Goldin, O. (1996). ExpUiningan Eclipse: Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2.1—10. Ann Arbor. Gomez-Lobo, A. (1989). “The ergon argument.” Phronesis 34,170-85. Gotthelf, A. (1985). “Notes towards a study of substance and essence in Aristotle’s Parts ofAnimak II—TV.” In A. Gotthelf (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studiespresented to DavidM. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday, Pittsburgh, 27-54. (1987). “First principles in Aristode’s Parts ofAnimak.” In A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 167-98. 0997)· “The elephant’s nose.” In W. Kullmann and S. Föllinger (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 85-96. Graham, W. (1975). “Counterpredicability and Per Se accidents.” Archiv fiir Geschichte der Philosophie 57,182—7. Granger, H. (1981). “The differentia and per se accident in Aristode.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63,118-29. Greenwood, L. H. G. (1909). AristotL· Nicomachean Ethics VI. Cambridge. Grote, G. (1880). AristotLe. 2nd edition. London. Hankinson, R. J. (2011). “Avant nous le déluge: Aristode’s notion of intellectual grasp.” In B. Morison and K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour ofJonathan Barnes, Oxford, 30-59. Hardie, W. F. R. (1980). Aristotle’s Ethical Theory. Second
edition, Oxford. Hasper, P. S. (2013). “Between science and dialectic: Aristotle’s account of good and bad peirastic arguments in the Sophistical Refutations.” LogicalAnalysu History ofPhilosophy 15, 286—322. Heinaman, R. (1993). “Rationality, eudaimonia and kakodaimonia in Aristotle.” Phronesis 33, 31—53. Henry, D. (2015). “Holding for the most part: the demonstrability of moral facts.” In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotk’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 169—89. Henry, D. and K. M. Nielsen. (2015). Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge. Höffe, О. (2006). “Ethik als Praktische Philosophie.” InO. Höffe (ed.), Aristoteles: Die Nicomachische Ethik, Berlin, 13-38. Inwood, B. and R. Woolf. (20x3). AristotL· Eudemian Ethics, Cambridge. Irwin, T. H. (1977). “Aristode’s discovery of metaphysics.” Review ofMetaphysics 31, 210-29. (1980). “The metaphysical and psychological basis of Aristode’s ethics.” In A. O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, Berkeley, 35-53. (1981). “Aristode’s methods of ethics.” In D. J. O’Meara (ed.), Studies in Aristotle, Washington, 193-223. (1988). Aristotk’s First Principles. Oxford.
254 Bibliography (zooo). “Ethics as an inexact science: Aristotle and the ambitions of moral theory.” In B. W. Hooker and M. Little (eds.), MoralParticulamm, Oxford, 100-29. Joachim, H. H. (1951). Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford. Johnson, M. R. (2005). Aristotle on Tekology. Oxford. (2015). “Aristotle’s architechtonic sciences.” In D. Ebrey (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge, 163-86. Jost, L. (1991). “Eudemian ethical method.” In J. P. Anton and A. Preus (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy II, Albany, 29—40. Judson, L. (1995). “Chance and ‘always or for the most part’ in Aristode.” In L. Judson (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford, 73-100. Karbowski, J. (2012). “Slaves, women, and Aristode’s natural teleology.” Ancient Philosophy 32, 323-50. (2013). “Aristode’s scientific inquiry into natural slavery.” Journal ofthe History ofPhilosophy 51, 331—53. (2014a). “Aristode on the deliberative abilities of women.” Apeiron 47, 435—60. (2014b). “Deliberating without authority. Fortenbaugh on the psychology of women in Aristotle’s Politics.” Philosophical News 8, 88—106. (20x4c). “Empirical eulogõs argumentation in Aristotle’s Generation ofAnimals Шло.” British Journalfor the History ofPhilosophy 22, 25-38. (2015a). “Endoxa, facts, and the starting points of the EN. In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 113—29. (2015b). “Complexity and progression in Aristode’s treatment of Endoxa in the Topics.” Ancient Philosophy 35, 75-96. (2015c). “Phainomena as witnesses and
examples: The methodology of Eudemian Ethics 1.6.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49,193—225. (2015d). “Is Aristode’s Etidemian Ethics quasi-mathematical?” Apeiron 48, 368-86. (2016a). “Aristode on the outline status of ethical first principles.” In B. Strobel and G. Wöhrle (eds.), Angewandte Epistemologie in antiker Philosophie und Wissenschaft, Trier, 115-35. (2016b). “Justification ‘by argument’ in Aristotle’s natural science.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51,117-58. Kelsey, S. (2013). “Truth and value in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophy 88,197-218. (2015). “Empty words.” In D. Ebrey (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge, 199-216. Kenny, A. (1979). Aristotle’s Theory ofthe Will. Oxford. (2011). Aristotle: The Etidemian Ethics. Oxford. Kosman, L. A. (1973). “Understanding, explanation, and insight in Aristode’s Posterior Analytics.” In E. N. Lee, A. P. D. Mourelatos, and R. M. Rorty (eds.), Exegesis andArgument. Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastas, Assen, 374—92. Kraut, R. (1989). Aristotle on the Human Good. Princeton.
Bibliography 255 (1998). “Aristotle on method and moral education.” In J. Genzler (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 271-90. (2002). Aristotle: Political Philosophy. Oxford. (2006). “How to justify ethical propositions: Aristotle’s method.” In R. Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Malden, Oxford, and Victoria, 76—95. Kullmann, W. (1974). Wissenschaft und Methode: Interpretationen zur aristoteluchen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin and New York. (1981). “Die Funktion der mathematischen Beispeie in Aristoteles’ Analytica Posteriora.” In E. Berti (ed.), AristotU on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, Padua, 245-70. (2011). “Aristode’s gradual turn from dialectic.” In J. Fink (ed.), The Development ofDialecticfrom PUto to Aristotle, Cambridge, 296-315. Landor, B. (1985). “Aristode on demonstrating essence.” Apeiron 19,116-32. Lennox, J. G. (1987a). “Divide and explain: the Posterior Analytics in practice.” In A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 90-119. (1987b). “Kinds, forms of kinds, and the more and the less in Aristode’s biology.” In A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 339—59. (1994). “Aristotelian problems.” Ancient Philosophy 14, 53—77. (ī997). “Material and formal natures in Aristode’s De Partibus Animalium.” Proceedings ofthe Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11, 217—40. (2001a). AristotU: On the Parts ofAnimals I—W. Oxford. (2001b). “Between data and
demonstration.” In J. G. Lennox (ed.), AristotU’s Philosophy ofBiology: Studies in the Origins ofLife Science, Cambridge, 39—71. (2004). “The place of zoology in Aristode’s natural philosophy.” In R. W. Sharpies (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, London, 58-70· (2010). “Aristode’s natural science: the Many and the One.” In J. H. Lesher (ed.), From Inquiry to Demonstrative KnowUdge: New Essays on AristotU’s Posterior Analytics, Apeiron 43,1—23. (2011). “Aristode on norms of inquiry.” HOPOS x, 23-46. Lesher, J. H. (2001). “On Aristotelian episteme as ‘understanding’.” Ancient Philosophy 21, 45-55. Leunissen, M. (2010). Explanation and TeUology in AristotU’s Science of Nature, Cambridge. (2015), “Aristotle on knowing natural science for the sake of living well.” In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between AristotU’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 214-31. Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996). Aristotelian ExpUrations. Cambridge. Malink, M. (2013). AristotU s Modal Syllogistic. Cambridge. Mann, W. (2016). “Review of Bridging the Gap Between AristotU’s Science and Ethics.” Classical World 109,570-2. Mansion, A. (1946). Introduction à և physique aristotélicienne, 2nd ed. Louvain.
V)6 Bibliography McDavid, B. (2015). “Review of D. Heny and К М. Nielsen, Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics.” Notre Dame Philosophical Review io. 18. 2015. McDowell, J. (1996). “Deliberation and moral development in Aristode’s ethics.” In S. Engström and J. Whiting (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Cambridge, 19—35. (1998). “Some issues in Aristotle’s moral psychology.” In S. Everson (ed.), Ethics: A Companion to Ancient Thought, Cambridge, 107-28. McKirahan, R. (1992). Principles and Proofi: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton. (2010). “The place of the Posterior Analytics in Aristode’s thought, with parti cular reference to the Poetics.” In J. H. Lesher (ed.), From Inquiry to Demonstrative Knowledge: New Essays on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Apeiron 43, 75—104. Menn, S. (2002). “Aristode’s definition of soul and the programme of the De Anima.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22, 83-139. (2012). “Critique of earlier philosophers on the good and the causes.” In C. Steel (ed.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha, Oxford, 201-24. Mignucci, M. (1981). “Hos epi to polu et necessaire dans la conception Aristotélicienne de la science.” In E. Berti (ed.), Aristotle on Science: the Posterior Analytics, Padua, 173-203. Mirhady, D. C. (2002). “Athens’ democratic witnesses.” Phoenix 56, 255-74. Modrak, D. K. (1987). Aristotle: The Power ofPerception. Chicago. Moraux, P. (1968). “La joute dialectique d’après le huitième livre des Topiques.” In G. E. L. Owen (ed.), Aristotle on Dialectic: the Topics,
Oxford, 277—311. Moss, J. {гоіг). Aristotle on the Apparent Goods Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire. Oxford. Natali, C. (2007). “Rhetorical and scientific aspects of the Nicomachean Ethics.” Phronesis 52, 364-81. (2009). “Particular virtues in the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristode.” In R. Sharpies (ed.), ParticuUrs in Greek Philosophy, Leiden, 73-96. (2010). “Posterior Analytics and the definition of happiness in NE I.” Phronesis 55. 304-М· (2015). “The search for definitions of justice in Nicomachean Ethics 5.” In D. Henry and К. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 148-68. Nielsen, К. M. (2008). “The private parts of animals: Aristode on the teleology of sexual difference.” Phronesis 53, 373-405. (2015). “Aristode on principles in ethics: political science as the science of the human Good.” In D. Henry and К. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 29-48. Nussbaum, M. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge. Owen, G. E. L. (i960). “Logic and metaphysics in some eady works of Aristode.” In I. Düring and G. E. L. Owen (eds.), Aristotle andPkto in the Mid-Fourth Century, Göteborg, 163-90.
Bibliography 257 (1961). “ Tithenai ta phainomena.” In S. Mansion (ed.), Aristote et ks problèmes de méthode, Louvain, 83-103. (1965). “Aristotle on the snares of ontology.” In R. Bambrough (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London, 69—95. Patzig, G. (i960). “Theologie und ontology in der ‘Metaphysik’ des Aristoteles,” Kant-Studien 52,185-205. Translated and reprinted as “Theology and ontol ogy in Aristode’s Metaphysics.” In J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.) (1975), Articks on Aristotle III: Metaphysics, London, 33-49. Pellegrin, P. (2005). Seconds Analytiques. Paris. Polanský, R. (2014). “Introduction: ethics as a practical science.” In R. Polanský (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotk’s Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge, 1-13. Primavesi, O. (1996). Die Aristotelische Topik: Ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik В. Munich. Reeve, C. D. C. (1992). Practices ofReason. Oxford. (1998). “Dialectic and philosophy in Aristotle.” In J. Genzler (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 227-52. (2000). Substantial Knowkdge: Aristotk’s Metaphysics. Indianapolis. (2012). Action, Contemplation, and Happiness: An Essay on Aristotk. Harvard. Richardson Lear, G. (2004). Happy Lives and the Human Good. Princeton. Robinson, R. (1953). Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Oxford. Roche, T. (1988). “On the alleged metaphysical foundation of Aristotle’s ethics.” Ancient Phiksophy 8, 49-62. (1992). “In defense of an alternative view of the foundation of Aristode’s moral theory.” Phronesis 37, 46-84. Ross, W. D. (1949). Aristotk’s Prior and Posterior
Analytics. Oxford. Rowe, C. J. (1971). The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics: A Study in the Devekpment ofAristotk’s Thought. Cambridge. Salmieri, G. (2009). “Aristotle’s non-‘dialecticaľ methodology in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Ancient Phiksophy 29, 311—35. Schofield, M. (2006). “Aristode’s political ethics.” In R. Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotk’s Nicomachean Ethics, Malden, Oxford, and Victoria, 305-22. Scott, D. (2015). Levels ofArgument: A Comparative Study ofPkto’s Republic and Aristotk’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford. Sherman, N. (1989). The Fabric of Character: Aristotk’s Theory of Virtue. Oxford. Shields, C. (2002). Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy ofAristotk. Oxford. (2015). “The science of soul in Aristotle’s ethics.” In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotk’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 232-53. Simpson, P. L. (2013). The Eudemian Ethics ofAristotk. New Brunswick. Slomkowski, P. (1997). Aristotk’s Topics. Leiden. Smith, R. (1993). “Aristode on the uses of dialectic.” Synthese 96, 335—5^. (1997). Aristotk: Topics I and VIIL Oxford.
258 Bibliography (1999). “Dialectic and method in Aristode.” In M. Sim (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham, 39—55. Sorabji, R. (1980). “Aristode on the role of intellect in virtue.” In A. O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle s Ethics, Berkeley, 201—19. Taylor, C. (2006). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics Books II—TV. Oxford. Tierney, R. (2001a). “Aristode’s scientific demonstrations as expositions of essence.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy zo, 149-70. (2001b). “On the senses of ‘sumbebekos’ in Aristode.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21, 61-82. Tuozzo, T. (1996). “The function of human beings and the ratio nähty of the universe: Aristotle and Zeno on parts and wholes.” Phoenix 50,146-61. Ward, J. K. (1995). “Focal reference in Aristode’s account of Philia: Eudemian Ethics VII.2.” Apeiron 28,183-205. (2008). Dialectic and Science. Cambridge. Wedin, M. (1980). “Aristode on the good for man.” Mind90, 243-62. Weil, E. (1951). “The place of logic in Aristode’s thought.” Revue de Métaphysique et Morale 56, 283—3x5. Whitíng, J. (1988). “Aristode’s function argument: A defense.” Ancient Philosophy 8, 33-48. Wians, W. (1996). “Scientific examples in the Posterior Analytics.” In W. Wians (ed.), Aristotle ’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Lanham, 131-50. Wieland, W. (1962). Die aristotelische Physik. Göttingen. Winter, M. (1997). “Aristode hős epi to polu relations, and a demonstrative science of ethics.” Phronesis 42,163-89. Witt, C. (2015). ‘“As if by convention alone’: the unstable ontology of Aristode’s ethics.”
In D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristode’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 276-92. Włodarczyk, M. (2000). “Aristotelian dialectic and the discovery of truth.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18,153—210. Woods, M. J. (1992). Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics: Boob I, II, and VIII. Oxford. Yurdin, J. and P. S. Hasper. (2014). “Between perception and scientific knowledge: Aristode’s account of experience.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47, 119-50. Zingano, M. (2007). “Aristode and the problems of the method in ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32, 297—330. Zuppolini, B. (20x6). “Aristode’s foundationalism.” Dissertado 44,187-211. (2018). “Aristode on per se accidents.” Ancient Philosophy 38,1-23.
Subject Index Achtenberg, Deborah, 229-30, Ч5-7 action(s) forced, 125, 212-13 as goal of ethical inquiry, 75,198 and ignorance, 213-14 virtuous, 207 See also (in)voluntary action(s) appropriateness principle, 148-9, 226-8 See ako parerla-, principle(s); soul argument (logos), 23 See ako demonstration; dialectic; fonction argument arithmetic harmonics subordinate to, 241-2 See ako mathematics autonomy among disciplines, 144-5 explanatory, of ethics, 234, 241-2, 244 justificatory, of ethics, 218-29 of the sciences, 220-1, 241 practical, 234, 235 See ako ethics; precision not to be sought at the beginning of inquiry, 87,164-7,194 philosophy concerned with, 57-8, 63 pure formal causes, 182 See ако epistēmē·, essence(s); principles choice in the Eudemian Ethics, 126-31 and friendship, 129,130 contemplation as perfect happiness, 183-4 Cooper, John, 2,162,199 courage demonstration of goodness of, 180 explanation of, 180 instrumental value of, 180 intrinsic value of, 181—2 as noble, 183 See ако good(s); virtue craft (techne) analogy with ethics, 206-7, 210 combines épistémè and experience, 151-61 concerned with both universals and particulars, 150-1,152,153,160 concerned with causes and principles, 71,155 and virtue, 207 Barney, Rachel, 222-3 belief relationship to truth, 30-1 See ako truth Bolton, Robert, 46-7, 92 Broadie, Sarah, 146 Bronstein, David, 60, 89 Brunschwig, J., 26, 34-5 Burnet, John, 2, 3 definition(s), 69 causal, 84-6,113-14,174 as goal of political philosophy, 162 crucial to philosophy, 86-8,100, 112-I3 general method for seeking, 90-4 and demonstrations, 60, 85,
90-3, 113-14 different kinds of, 95—6 ethical principles as, 172-4 of happiness, 200-1 (see ако happiness) of human fonction, 87 of justice, 87 of mean, 208 as principles of demonstrative sciences, 58, 69 cause(s), 57-8 definitions as, 84-6 every intellectual discipline concerned with, 154-5 four kinds of, 58,182 intimately finked with principles, 57-8 259
260 Subject Index definition^) (cont.) sought in stages, philosophical inquiry, 95-6, 210-11 See abo cause(s); essences; ethics; philosophy deliberation, 155-6 and conditional necessity, 157 and causes, 156 as a mode of inquiry, 157,178 compared with teleological explanation, 157 See abo cause(s); explanations: teleological; phronēsis demonstration^), 59-60, 92-3 and epistēmē, 63, 90 as instrument of philosophy, 58-62 of instrumental value, 177-81 of intrinsic value, 181-2 involving for the most part truths, 62 purely formal, 182-5 as scientific deductions, 59 in the strictest sense, 61 two models of, 60-1 See abo definition(s); epistēmē, philosophy dependence. See autonomy dialectic ambiguity of, 21 and arguments on both sides of issue, 37, 38 makes grasping truth easier, 37 as craft, 22, 31-41 constituents of, 32-6 and first principles, 39-41, 43-4 in philosophical discourse, 32, 37, 52 uses of, 36-9 difference from philosophy, 6, 30-1 insufficient for truth/epistēmē, 37—8, 78, 81-2 as mode of reasoning, 24—5 according to belief/opinion, 28—31, 51 competitive versus cooperative, 23-4 versus philosophical reasoning, 30-1 peirastic, 41-50 “common things” (koina), 44—5 and consequences, 46 reveals ignorance, 49-50 and truth, 46-50 problems, 22—3, 33 See abo tools (organa)՝, topoi education Aristotle and moral, 161-2, 246-7 factors of, 161 endoxa, 3, 25, 46-7 versus adoxa, 27-9 as beliefs, 25 feature in dialectic and philosophy, 31 many uses of, 16, 40 as true, 117—18,169, 204 ends. See goals epistēmē (demonstrative scientific knowledge), 5, 7, 8,14-15, 63-4, 246-7 concerned
with eternal kinds, 64 different meanings of, 53-5 as goal of all branches of philosophy, 53,54—5, 63-6, 88 versus ՈՕԱՏ, 8, 97 as necessary for phronēsis, 151-61,187 qualified {tint), 65-6, 71,143,145 unqualified (haplõs), 63-5, 71,142,143 See abo demonstration; gnosis , science(s); nous essence(s) as cause of per se accidents, 86,113 as ontological prindpie(s), 58 sought after existence, 86, 89 See abo definition; nous; per se accidents; principiéis) ethics, 246 as demonstrative science, 185—7, 246-7 investigates beings qua human goods, 174—5, 236, 240-2 less precise than natural science, 145 as practical philosophy, 75, 112, 133,147,195-6 seeks qualified epistēmē, 66, іи-14, J43 M7 See abo autonomy; Eudemian Ethics·, Nicomachean Ethics; phronēsis Eudemian Ethics argumentative strategy of, 114-17 cognitive aim of, 111-14,131-2 compared to Nicomachean Ethics, 109,132, 133,189 concern with causes, 112-14 concern with truth, II2 global method of, 110-20 as inquiry toward first principles, 114,131 phainomena in, 117-19 as witnesses and examples, 116,117-19 See abo education, Aristotle and moral; ethics; Nicomachean Ethics experience and lack of eputēmē, 154 practically superior to causal theory alone, 150 expianation(s), See cause(s); demonstration fact(s) versus causes, 87, 89-90 different sources of, 168 of different types in the Nicomachean Ethics, 169-72 versus endoxa, 168—9 as ethical starting points, 164-7, 225-6» 247 result from a good upbringing, 164-5 as scientific notion, 167-9 See abo norms of inquiry; truth(s)
Subject Index first philosophy. See metaphysics flexibility (strategic), 15-17,106, 247-8 in Eudemian Ethics, 132-5 in Nicomachean Ethics, 200-15 See abo judgment; norms of inquiry for the most part (hős epi to polu), ці—3 and accidental regularities, 143 in ethics, 66,142 in natural science, 65—6,142 as plural quantifier, 141 and qualified episteme, 62, 65,143 See abo demonstration; episteme՜, ethics; precision function. See goal function argument, 202-4 for the existence of a human function, 221—3 identifying the human function, 223—5 four parts of, 202-4 independent of theoretical principles, 218—29 See abo autonomy; Nicomachean Ethics geometry and medicine, 231 and optics, 241—2 See abo mathematics giftedness, natural, 37 gnosis (ordinary knowledge), 49, 62-3, 167-8 versus episteme, 227-8 practical, 171—2 yielded by perception, 98 See also epistēmč, feas; inquiry goal(s) (ends) coincides with fimetion, 121 as final cause(s), 156,157,177-81 orient deliberation, 156,178 good(s) attained through action, 202 cosmic versus human, 236-7 final, 176 fluctuation and variation of, 14,138-9 form of the, 98 instrumental, 177-81 intrinsic, 181 of the soul versus external, 120 subordinate, 13,177 teleological structure of, 175—7 theory of, 246 See abo ethics; happiness; phronesis, virtue habituation as source of facts, 165,168,171 yields ethical knowledge, 226, 229 See abo ethics; virtue 261 happiness as activity of virtuous soul, 121,122, 172-3 as cause of goodness, 176-7 as end/principle of action, 72,112-13,176 as highest/best human good, 13,121—2, 175 finality and self-
sufficiency of, 202 inquiry into, 120-2, 201 perfect (as contemplation), 183—4, 239 See abo good(s); phronēsis, virtue harmonics subordinate to arithmetic, 241—2 health as final cause of medical treatment, 72,156 induction, 23 as source of facts, 168 inquiry ethical as definitional, 113,172-4 as flexible, 15-17,132-5, 200-15 as oriented at causes/épistémè, 172,198, 247 philosophical different stages of, 95-6 as erotetic/question-oriented, 88—90 four objects of, 88—90 non-Platonic strands in, 96-9 into place, 87 into void, 87 See abo deliberation; norms of inquiry; philosophy Irwin, Terence, 79-83, 218-19, 220-1, 228-9 Johnson, Monte Ransome, 237—8 judgment in philosophical inquiry, 9-10,15-17,105, 247-8 knowledge, See epistēmē-, gnosis, nous , wisdom Kraut, R., 217 lawgiver, 159 needs knowledge (gnosis) of the soul, 228, 243-4 not epistēmēl nous, 243-4 See abo phronèsb: legislative Lennox, James G., 8,17 mathematics concerned with formal causes, 182 as tertiary philosophy, 75 See abo geometry; philosophy
Subject Index гбг medicine explanatorily subordinate to natural science, 242-4 not subordinate to geometry, 231 metaphysics concerned with cosmic goodness, 236-7 as demonstrative science, 81 as first philosophy, 74, 76, 236 studies beings qua beings, 80, 236 See abo philosophy method(ology). See norms of inquiry natural science amenable to qualified epistēmē, 65-6,157 as second philosophy, 74-5 local norms of, 100—1 medicine as subordinate to, 242-4 more precise than ethics, 145 perception as ultimate standard of, 196 studies beings qua changing and enmattered, 236 teleological explanations in, 157,178-9 as demonstrations, 157,179 See abo démonstration^); philosophy; science Nicomachean Ethics argumentative strategy of, 200 audience of, 198-9 cognitive aim of, 172,198 compared to Eudemian Ethics, 109,132,133, 189,199-200 as demonstrative science in finished form, 185-6 first principles in, 148,172-85,199-200 as definitions, 140,172—3, *74 global methodology of, 197—200 as inquiry toward first principles, 162,191, 238 as philosophical work, 136 as political, 136,162,199 practical aim of, 171-2,198, 202 starting points of, 164—7,199, 232-3 as facts, 169-72 See abo autonomy; education, Aristode and moral, ethics; precision norms of inquiry general philosophical, 4-5, 7-8, 9, 88-99, 100,103 versus local, 100,101,133 local, 8-9,100-2 experience and, 38—9,102 sources of, 101-2 versus “topic specific,” 78-9,102—3 topic-specific, ІО—И, 102—4, I33“4» 196-7 endoxic method as, 10-11,103-4 See abo judgment nous develops out of perception, 97, 98-9 differs from sophia, 159 how acquired,
97 as non-demonstrative épistémè, 8, 97 not a faculty of intuition, 97 as state that grasps first principles, 97,184-5 See abo épistémè, essence(s); inquiry: philosophical optics subordinated to geometry, 241-2 optimism, in Aristotle, 99 outline (tupõi) accounts, 143—5 definition of happiness as, 193, 204 See abo ethics; precision Owen, G. E. L., 2-4, 6 parerga (subsidiary matters) versus main tasks {erga), 149-50,193, 227 See abo appropriateness principiéis) particulars, versus universals, 147. See abo under craft; phronēsb perception Plato versus Aristode on, 98 as gnõsis of particulars, 168 as starting point of inquiry, 97, 98 See abo gnosis, inquiry perse accidents, 67-8,182-5 of ethical kinds, 183,186 See abo demonstration^); épistémè, science per se relations, 62,157,179 See abo épistémè, essence; perse accidents philosopher. See philosophy philosophy iphihsophid) as compartmental, 72-4 and demonstration, 58-62 and dialectic, 21-2 {see abo dialectic) difference from dialectic, 6, 30-1, 63-Ճ features of (list), 76-7 as oriented at épistémè, 53, 63, 77,105—6 as paradigmade, 74 as serial, 74-6 theoretical versus practical, 240-2 seeks épistémè for its own sake, 75 three branches of, 54-5, 74-5 and truth, 29-30,55-7, 77 See abo ethics; metaphysics; science; truth phronesis, 159 concern with universals and particulars, 151, 152,153,160-1 differs from epistēmē, 159 legislative, 158-61,187 integrates epistēmē with experience, 151-61
263 Subject Index requires experience, 155 See also ethics; lawgiver; craft; universais phronimos. See phronisis physics. See natural science Plato on dialectic and epinėms. 73, 79 on higher learning, 97—8 on mathematics, 73 on philosophy, 73 on reality, 73 on truth, 57 political science, 158-9 branches of, 158-9 and metaphysics, 237-8 subordinate to wisdom, 235 See abo ethics; lawgiver; phronisis·. legislative Posterior Analytics as Aristode’s general treatise on philosophy, 4-5, 7-8, 83, 85-6, too, 132 See abo norms of inquiry; philosophy; science precision in ethics, 137-45 and fluctuation of the subject matter, 138—41 and goal of inquiry, 193,194,195, 226—7 See abo appropriateness principle; ethics; for the most part; outline principle of non-contradiction (PNC) elenctic defense of, 82-3 principiéis), 58 and causes, 57-8 of demonstration/ epbtimi, 68-9, 72 inquiry toward versus inquiry from, Í91 ontological vemts epistemological, 58 philosophy concerned with, 57—8, 63 of production and action (=goals), 72 See also causes; epistimi՜, Eudemian Ethics·, Nicomachean Ethics, пош puzzles (aporia։) Aristode’s use of varied, 9-10,16, 38,126-31 and endoxa, 16,103-4 in the endoxic method, 103-4,115-16 and experience, 38-9 and inquiries, 129 as knots in the understanding, 38 not always employed, 16,38-9 about self-love, 197 sources varied, 38-9,130 reality structure of, 7, 57, 73-4 See abo cause; essence; principle; truth reason(ing) characteristic of humans, 203-4, 224-5 dialectical versus philosophical, 30-1 ethics as education of, 162 recollection, 98 reftitation(s)
sophistical, 42—3 versus peirasdc, 48 See abo dialecdc: peirasdc science (demonstratíve) as format of finished philosophical theory, 55 66-9 general scope of, 69—72 objects concerned with, 66-9,185 derivative kinds, 67-8 essences, 67,185 per se accidents, 67—8,186 primary kinds, 67—8 subject genus, 66-8 statements constitutive of, 68-9,186 axioms, 68-9,186 definitions, 69,186 hypotheses, 69,186 theorems, 69,186 theses, 69 See abo essence(s); definition; demonstrations^); epbtimi Scott, Dominic, 229-30, 232, 238-40 soul lawgiver needs knowledge of, 227, 243—4 See abo appropriateness principle; autonomy; ethics; happiness; virtue syllogism. See demonstration . theology. See metaphysics took (organa), 33-6 See abo dialectic; topoi Topics as handbook on dialectic, 32, 53, 84 purpose to develop dialectical craft, 32, 36 See abo dialectic; tools; topoi topoi, 34-6,45 See abo dialectic; tools; Topics treatises, Aristode’s as simulated inquiries, 17-18 See abo individual works truth Arktode on our natural affinity for, 98-9, III versus endoxa, 168-9 as epktemic standard of philosophical reasoning, 7, 30, 55—7 as goal of philosophical inquiry, 77 incompatible with belief qua epktemic standard, 30-1 as subject matter of first philosophy, 57, 63 versus Truth, 57, 77 See abo epistimi, for the most part; philosophy
264 Subject Index universals as objects of épistémè, 64,152-3 explanatory, 152 knowledge of required for optimum action/ production, 247 See abo cause; craft; episteme,; phronēsis upbringing, good, See habituation value. See good(s) virtue(s) acquired by habituation, 206-7 best capacity of soul, 121 of character, 206 definition of, 207-11 as a mean state in action and emotion, 209,210-11 philosophical, 248 See abo courage; good(s); habituation; happiness (in)voluntary action (s) definition of, 211, 214-15 inquiry into in EE, 123-6 inquiry into in NE, 211-15 See abo action(s) wisdom {sophid), differs from nous, 159 as knowledge of highest causes and principi։ 233-4 metaphysics’s épistémè yields, 76 natural science and mathematics as forms of, 76 as ultimate practical authority, 235 See abo metaphysics; nous·, philosophy Witt, Charlotte, 138
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Karbowski, Joseph |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1178449890 |
| author_facet | Karbowski, Joseph |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Karbowski, Joseph |
| author_variant | j k jk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045435434 |
| contents | The dialectical orthodoxy -- Dialectical reasoning and the dialectical craft -- The enterprise of philosophy -- Aristotle's scientific and flexible philosophical method -- Method in the Eudemian ethics -- Ethical precision and the practical necessity of episteme -- Facts, principles, and Aristotle's demonstrative ethical science -- Strategic flexibility in the Nicomachean ethics -- The autonomy of ethics |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1088317077 (DE-599)BVBBV045435434 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03070nam a22005178c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045435434</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210906 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190131s2019 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108419598</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-41959-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1088317077</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045435434</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M468</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karbowski, Joseph</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1178449890</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aristotle's method in ethics</subfield><subfield code="b">philosophy in practice</subfield><subfield code="c">Joseph Karbowski, University of Pittsburgh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 275 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dialectical orthodoxy -- Dialectical reasoning and the dialectical craft -- The enterprise of philosophy -- Aristotle's scientific and flexible philosophical method -- Method in the Eudemian ethics -- Ethical precision and the practical necessity of episteme -- Facts, principles, and Aristotle's demonstrative ethical science -- Strategic flexibility in the Nicomachean ethics -- The autonomy of ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book examines Aristotle's method in ethics. Let me be clear that I do not think that Aristotle has an ethical "method" in the sense of a mechanical decision procedure for seeking ethical knowledge which eliminates the need for creative insight and judgment. In fact, his reliance upon judgment in his ethical inquiries, and philosophical inquiries more generally, is a major theme of this book"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aristoteles</subfield><subfield code="d">v384-v322</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118650130</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethics, Ancient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethics, Ancient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aristotelis Ethica Eudemica</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000000343</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000000344</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000006651</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aristoteles</subfield><subfield code="d">v384-v322</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118650130</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-41145-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Sachregister</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20191108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_4_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030821053</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09014</subfield><subfield code="g">38</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045435434 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:18:05Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108419598 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030821053 |
| oclc_num | 1088317077 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-20 DE-M468 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-20 DE-M468 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | xii, 275 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20191108 gbd_4_2107 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Karbowski, Joseph Verfasser (DE-588)1178449890 aut Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice Joseph Karbowski, University of Pittsburgh Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore Cambridge University Press 2019 xii, 275 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The dialectical orthodoxy -- Dialectical reasoning and the dialectical craft -- The enterprise of philosophy -- Aristotle's scientific and flexible philosophical method -- Method in the Eudemian ethics -- Ethical precision and the practical necessity of episteme -- Facts, principles, and Aristotle's demonstrative ethical science -- Strategic flexibility in the Nicomachean ethics -- The autonomy of ethics "This book examines Aristotle's method in ethics. Let me be clear that I do not think that Aristotle has an ethical "method" in the sense of a mechanical decision procedure for seeking ethical knowledge which eliminates the need for creative insight and judgment. In fact, his reliance upon judgment in his ethical inquiries, and philosophical inquiries more generally, is a major theme of this book"-- Aristoteles v384-v322 (DE-588)118650130 gnd rswk-swf Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf Aristotle Ethics, Ancient Aristotelis Ethica Eudemica (DE-2581)TH000000343 gbd Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea (DE-2581)TH000000344 gbd Ethik (DE-2581)TH000006651 gbd Aristoteles v384-v322 (DE-588)118650130 p Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-108-41145-5 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Sachregister |
| spellingShingle | Karbowski, Joseph Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice The dialectical orthodoxy -- Dialectical reasoning and the dialectical craft -- The enterprise of philosophy -- Aristotle's scientific and flexible philosophical method -- Method in the Eudemian ethics -- Ethical precision and the practical necessity of episteme -- Facts, principles, and Aristotle's demonstrative ethical science -- Strategic flexibility in the Nicomachean ethics -- The autonomy of ethics Aristoteles v384-v322 (DE-588)118650130 gnd Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)118650130 (DE-588)4015602-3 |
| title | Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice |
| title_auth | Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice |
| title_exact_search | Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice |
| title_full | Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice Joseph Karbowski, University of Pittsburgh |
| title_fullStr | Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice Joseph Karbowski, University of Pittsburgh |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aristotle's method in ethics philosophy in practice Joseph Karbowski, University of Pittsburgh |
| title_short | Aristotle's method in ethics |
| title_sort | aristotle s method in ethics philosophy in practice |
| title_sub | philosophy in practice |
| topic | Aristoteles v384-v322 (DE-588)118650130 gnd Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Aristoteles v384-v322 Ethik |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030821053&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karbowskijoseph aristotlesmethodinethicsphilosophyinpractice |