The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Frankfurt
Ontos Verlag
2007
|
Schriftenreihe: | Philosophische Analyse
Bd. 16 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | FLA01 |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (192 pages) |
ISBN: | 9783110326956 3110326957 3110326620 9783110326628 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV045356744 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181212s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783110326956 |9 978-3-11-032695-6 | ||
020 | |a 3110326957 |9 3-11-032695-7 | ||
020 | |a 3110326620 |9 3-11-032662-0 | ||
020 | |a 9783110326628 |9 978-3-11-032662-8 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-4-EBU)ocn854569274 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)854569274 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045356744 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
082 | 0 | |a 340.112 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Schrenk, Markus A. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws |c Markus Schrenk |
264 | 1 | |a Frankfurt |b Ontos Verlag |c 2007 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (192 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Philosophische Analyse |v Bd. 16 | |
505 | 8 | |a Universality is not sufficient to distinguish laws of nature from accidental regularities. A multitude of additional defining features have been suggested. Yet, once it is acknowledged that exceptionless universality is not the only criterion for lawhood it is possible to start questioning whether it is necessary. Markus Schrenk's The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws takes this bold step and it's provocative conclusion is that existing theories - especially David Lewis's and David Armstrong's - are, in fact, strong enough to guarantee lawhood even if there are instances that do not conform | |
650 | 7 | |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Science / Methodology |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Science / Philosophy |2 fast | |
650 | 4 | |a Science |x Philosophy |a Science |x Methodology | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetz |g Wissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4137489-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ceteris-paribus-Klausel |0 (DE-588)7559399-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Metaphysik |0 (DE-588)4038936-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ceteris-paribus-Klausel |0 (DE-588)7559399-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesetz |g Wissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4137489-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Metaphysik |0 (DE-588)4038936-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Schrenk, Markus A. |t Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 2007 |z 9783110326628 |
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBU | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030743336 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=603687 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-4-EBU |q FLA_PDA_EBU |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804179186635505664 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Schrenk, Markus A. |
author_facet | Schrenk, Markus A. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Schrenk, Markus A. |
author_variant | m a s ma mas |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV045356744 |
collection | ZDB-4-EBU |
contents | Universality is not sufficient to distinguish laws of nature from accidental regularities. A multitude of additional defining features have been suggested. Yet, once it is acknowledged that exceptionless universality is not the only criterion for lawhood it is possible to start questioning whether it is necessary. Markus Schrenk's The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws takes this bold step and it's provocative conclusion is that existing theories - especially David Lewis's and David Armstrong's - are, in fact, strong enough to guarantee lawhood even if there are instances that do not conform |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-EBU)ocn854569274 (OCoLC)854569274 (DE-599)BVBBV045356744 |
dewey-full | 340.112 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
dewey-raw | 340.112 |
dewey-search | 340.112 |
dewey-sort | 3340.112 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02762nmm a2200529zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045356744</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181212s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110326956</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-032695-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110326957</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-032695-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110326620</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-032662-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110326628</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-032662-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-EBU)ocn854569274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)854569274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045356744</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340.112</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schrenk, Markus A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws</subfield><subfield code="c">Markus Schrenk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt</subfield><subfield code="b">Ontos Verlag</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (192 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Philosophische Analyse</subfield><subfield code="v">Bd. 16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Universality is not sufficient to distinguish laws of nature from accidental regularities. A multitude of additional defining features have been suggested. Yet, once it is acknowledged that exceptionless universality is not the only criterion for lawhood it is possible to start questioning whether it is necessary. Markus Schrenk's The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws takes this bold step and it's provocative conclusion is that existing theories - especially David Lewis's and David Armstrong's - are, in fact, strong enough to guarantee lawhood even if there are instances that do not conform</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science / Methodology</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science / Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetz</subfield><subfield code="g">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4137489-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ceteris-paribus-Klausel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7559399-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metaphysik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038936-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ceteris-paribus-Klausel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7559399-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesetz</subfield><subfield code="g">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4137489-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Metaphysik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038936-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Schrenk, Markus A.</subfield><subfield code="t">Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : De Gruyter, 2007</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110326628</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBU</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030743336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=603687</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBU</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_EBU</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV045356744 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:15:52Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9783110326956 3110326957 3110326620 9783110326628 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030743336 |
oclc_num | 854569274 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 1 online resource (192 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBU ZDB-4-EBU FLA_PDA_EBU |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | Ontos Verlag |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Philosophische Analyse |
spelling | Schrenk, Markus A. Verfasser aut The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws Markus Schrenk Frankfurt Ontos Verlag 2007 1 online resource (192 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Philosophische Analyse Bd. 16 Universality is not sufficient to distinguish laws of nature from accidental regularities. A multitude of additional defining features have been suggested. Yet, once it is acknowledged that exceptionless universality is not the only criterion for lawhood it is possible to start questioning whether it is necessary. Markus Schrenk's The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws takes this bold step and it's provocative conclusion is that existing theories - especially David Lewis's and David Armstrong's - are, in fact, strong enough to guarantee lawhood even if there are instances that do not conform BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory bisacsh Science / Methodology fast Science / Philosophy fast Science Philosophy Science Methodology Gesetz Wissenschaft (DE-588)4137489-7 gnd rswk-swf Ceteris-paribus-Klausel (DE-588)7559399-3 gnd rswk-swf Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 gnd rswk-swf 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Ceteris-paribus-Klausel (DE-588)7559399-3 s Gesetz Wissenschaft (DE-588)4137489-7 s Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 s 2\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Schrenk, Markus A. Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws Berlin : De Gruyter, 2007 9783110326628 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Schrenk, Markus A. The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws Universality is not sufficient to distinguish laws of nature from accidental regularities. A multitude of additional defining features have been suggested. Yet, once it is acknowledged that exceptionless universality is not the only criterion for lawhood it is possible to start questioning whether it is necessary. Markus Schrenk's The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws takes this bold step and it's provocative conclusion is that existing theories - especially David Lewis's and David Armstrong's - are, in fact, strong enough to guarantee lawhood even if there are instances that do not conform BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory bisacsh Science / Methodology fast Science / Philosophy fast Science Philosophy Science Methodology Gesetz Wissenschaft (DE-588)4137489-7 gnd Ceteris-paribus-Klausel (DE-588)7559399-3 gnd Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4137489-7 (DE-588)7559399-3 (DE-588)4038936-4 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws |
title_auth | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws |
title_exact_search | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws |
title_full | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws Markus Schrenk |
title_fullStr | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws Markus Schrenk |
title_full_unstemmed | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws Markus Schrenk |
title_short | The metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws |
title_sort | the metaphysics of ceteris paribus laws |
topic | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory bisacsh Science / Methodology fast Science / Philosophy fast Science Philosophy Science Methodology Gesetz Wissenschaft (DE-588)4137489-7 gnd Ceteris-paribus-Klausel (DE-588)7559399-3 gnd Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 gnd |
topic_facet | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory Science / Methodology Science / Philosophy Science Philosophy Science Methodology Gesetz Wissenschaft Ceteris-paribus-Klausel Metaphysik Hochschulschrift |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schrenkmarkusa themetaphysicsofceterisparibuslaws |