Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles: workshop summary
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
[2011]
|
| Schlagworte: |
Nuclear fuels
> Research
> United States
> Congresses
> Nuclear fuels
> Safety regulations
> Government policy
> United States
> Congresses
> Nuclear power plants
> Risk assessment
> United States
> Congresses
> Nuclear power plants
> Security measures
> United States
> Congresses
> Nuclear facilities
> Security measures
> United States
> Congresses
> National security
> United States
> Congresses
> Nuclear terrorism
> United States
> Prevention
> Congresses
|
| Beschreibung: | Print version record |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (ix, 100 pages) illustrations |
| ISBN: | 9780309220507 0309220505 1280123338 9781280123337 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045344729 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181206s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309220507 |9 978-0-309-22050-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309220505 |9 0-309-22050-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 1280123338 |9 1-280-12333-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781280123337 |9 978-1-280-12333-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-4-ENC)ocn777954171 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)777954171 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045344729 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 621.48/35 |2 23 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles |b workshop summary |c Sarah C. Case, rapporteur ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academies Press |c [2011] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (ix, 100 pages) |b illustrations | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Print version record | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The worldwide expansion of nuclear energy has been accompanied by concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation. If sited in states that do not possess nuclear weapons technology, some civilian nuclear technologies could provide a route for states or other organizations to acquire nuclear weapons. Metrics for assessing the resistance of a nuclear technology to diversion for non-peaceful uses-proliferation resistance-have been developed, but at present there is no clear consensus on whether and how these metrics are useful to policy decision makers. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy asked the National Academies to convene a public workshop addressing the capability of current and potential methodologies for assessing host state proliferation risk and resistance to meet the needs of decision makers. Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles is a summary of presentations and discussions that transpired at the workshop-held on August 1-2, 2011-prepared by a designated rapporteur following the workshop. It does not provide findings and recommendations or represent a consensus reached by the symposium participants or the workshop planning committee. However, several themes emerged through the workshop: nonproliferation and new technologies, separate policy and technical cultures, value of proliferation resistance analysis, usefulness of social science approaches. The workshop was organized as part of a larger project undertaken by the NRC, the next phase of which (following the workshop) will be a consensus study on improving the assessment of proliferation risks associated with nuclear fuel cycles. This study will culminate in a report prepared by a committee of experts with expertise in risk assessment and communication, proliferation metrics and research, nuclear fuel cycle facility design and engineering, international nuclear nonproliferation and national security policy, and nuclear weapons design. This report is planned for completion in the spring of 2013 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Power Resources / Nuclear |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a National security |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nuclear facilities / Security measures |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nuclear fuels / Research |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nuclear power plants / Risk assessment |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nuclear power plants / Security measures |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nuclear terrorism / Prevention |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nuclear fuels |x Research |z United States |v Congresses |a Nuclear fuels |x Safety regulations |x Government policy |z United States |v Congresses |a Nuclear power plants |x Risk assessment |z United States |v Congresses |a Nuclear power plants |x Security measures |z United States |v Congresses |a Nuclear facilities |x Security measures |z United States |v Congresses |a National security |z United States |v Congresses |a Nuclear terrorism |z United States |x Prevention |v Congresses | |
| 655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Case, Sarah C. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.) |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |t Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles |d Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, 2011 |z 0309220491 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-ENC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030731433 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179164787376128 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045344729 |
| collection | ZDB-4-ENC |
| contents | The worldwide expansion of nuclear energy has been accompanied by concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation. If sited in states that do not possess nuclear weapons technology, some civilian nuclear technologies could provide a route for states or other organizations to acquire nuclear weapons. Metrics for assessing the resistance of a nuclear technology to diversion for non-peaceful uses-proliferation resistance-have been developed, but at present there is no clear consensus on whether and how these metrics are useful to policy decision makers. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy asked the National Academies to convene a public workshop addressing the capability of current and potential methodologies for assessing host state proliferation risk and resistance to meet the needs of decision makers. Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles is a summary of presentations and discussions that transpired at the workshop-held on August 1-2, 2011-prepared by a designated rapporteur following the workshop. It does not provide findings and recommendations or represent a consensus reached by the symposium participants or the workshop planning committee. However, several themes emerged through the workshop: nonproliferation and new technologies, separate policy and technical cultures, value of proliferation resistance analysis, usefulness of social science approaches. The workshop was organized as part of a larger project undertaken by the NRC, the next phase of which (following the workshop) will be a consensus study on improving the assessment of proliferation risks associated with nuclear fuel cycles. This study will culminate in a report prepared by a committee of experts with expertise in risk assessment and communication, proliferation metrics and research, nuclear fuel cycle facility design and engineering, international nuclear nonproliferation and national security policy, and nuclear weapons design. This report is planned for completion in the spring of 2013 |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-ENC)ocn777954171 (OCoLC)777954171 (DE-599)BVBBV045344729 |
| dewey-full | 621.48/35 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
| dewey-ones | 621 - Applied physics |
| dewey-raw | 621.48/35 |
| dewey-search | 621.48/35 |
| dewey-sort | 3621.48 235 |
| dewey-tens | 620 - Engineering and allied operations |
| discipline | Energietechnik |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04414nmm a2200481zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045344729</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181206s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309220507</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-22050-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309220505</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-22050-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1280123338</subfield><subfield code="9">1-280-12333-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781280123337</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-280-12333-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-ENC)ocn777954171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)777954171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045344729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">621.48/35</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles</subfield><subfield code="b">workshop summary</subfield><subfield code="c">Sarah C. Case, rapporteur ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2011]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (ix, 100 pages)</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The worldwide expansion of nuclear energy has been accompanied by concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation. If sited in states that do not possess nuclear weapons technology, some civilian nuclear technologies could provide a route for states or other organizations to acquire nuclear weapons. Metrics for assessing the resistance of a nuclear technology to diversion for non-peaceful uses-proliferation resistance-have been developed, but at present there is no clear consensus on whether and how these metrics are useful to policy decision makers. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy asked the National Academies to convene a public workshop addressing the capability of current and potential methodologies for assessing host state proliferation risk and resistance to meet the needs of decision makers. Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles is a summary of presentations and discussions that transpired at the workshop-held on August 1-2, 2011-prepared by a designated rapporteur following the workshop. It does not provide findings and recommendations or represent a consensus reached by the symposium participants or the workshop planning committee. However, several themes emerged through the workshop: nonproliferation and new technologies, separate policy and technical cultures, value of proliferation resistance analysis, usefulness of social science approaches. The workshop was organized as part of a larger project undertaken by the NRC, the next phase of which (following the workshop) will be a consensus study on improving the assessment of proliferation risks associated with nuclear fuel cycles. This study will culminate in a report prepared by a committee of experts with expertise in risk assessment and communication, proliferation metrics and research, nuclear fuel cycle facility design and engineering, international nuclear nonproliferation and national security policy, and nuclear weapons design. This report is planned for completion in the spring of 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Power Resources / Nuclear</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nuclear facilities / Security measures</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuels / Research</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nuclear power plants / Risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nuclear power plants / Security measures</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nuclear terrorism / Prevention</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuels</subfield><subfield code="x">Research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuels</subfield><subfield code="x">Safety regulations</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield><subfield code="a">Nuclear power plants</subfield><subfield code="x">Risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield><subfield code="a">Nuclear power plants</subfield><subfield code="x">Security measures</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield><subfield code="a">Nuclear facilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Security measures</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield><subfield code="a">Nuclear terrorism</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Prevention</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Case, Sarah C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="t">Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, 2011</subfield><subfield code="z">0309220491</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-ENC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030731433</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | 1\p (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV045344729 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:15:31Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780309220507 0309220505 1280123338 9781280123337 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030731433 |
| oclc_num | 777954171 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource (ix, 100 pages) illustrations |
| psigel | ZDB-4-ENC |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary Sarah C. Case, rapporteur ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies Washington, D.C. National Academies Press [2011] 1 online resource (ix, 100 pages) illustrations txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Print version record The worldwide expansion of nuclear energy has been accompanied by concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation. If sited in states that do not possess nuclear weapons technology, some civilian nuclear technologies could provide a route for states or other organizations to acquire nuclear weapons. Metrics for assessing the resistance of a nuclear technology to diversion for non-peaceful uses-proliferation resistance-have been developed, but at present there is no clear consensus on whether and how these metrics are useful to policy decision makers. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy asked the National Academies to convene a public workshop addressing the capability of current and potential methodologies for assessing host state proliferation risk and resistance to meet the needs of decision makers. Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles is a summary of presentations and discussions that transpired at the workshop-held on August 1-2, 2011-prepared by a designated rapporteur following the workshop. It does not provide findings and recommendations or represent a consensus reached by the symposium participants or the workshop planning committee. However, several themes emerged through the workshop: nonproliferation and new technologies, separate policy and technical cultures, value of proliferation resistance analysis, usefulness of social science approaches. The workshop was organized as part of a larger project undertaken by the NRC, the next phase of which (following the workshop) will be a consensus study on improving the assessment of proliferation risks associated with nuclear fuel cycles. This study will culminate in a report prepared by a committee of experts with expertise in risk assessment and communication, proliferation metrics and research, nuclear fuel cycle facility design and engineering, international nuclear nonproliferation and national security policy, and nuclear weapons design. This report is planned for completion in the spring of 2013 TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Power Resources / Nuclear bisacsh National security fast Nuclear facilities / Security measures fast Nuclear fuels / Research fast Nuclear power plants / Risk assessment fast Nuclear power plants / Security measures fast Nuclear terrorism / Prevention fast Nuclear fuels Research United States Congresses Nuclear fuels Safety regulations Government policy United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Risk assessment United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Security measures United States Congresses Nuclear facilities Security measures United States Congresses National security United States Congresses Nuclear terrorism United States Prevention Congresses 1\p (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content Case, Sarah C. Sonstige oth National Research Council (U.S.) Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, 2011 0309220491 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary The worldwide expansion of nuclear energy has been accompanied by concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation. If sited in states that do not possess nuclear weapons technology, some civilian nuclear technologies could provide a route for states or other organizations to acquire nuclear weapons. Metrics for assessing the resistance of a nuclear technology to diversion for non-peaceful uses-proliferation resistance-have been developed, but at present there is no clear consensus on whether and how these metrics are useful to policy decision makers. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy asked the National Academies to convene a public workshop addressing the capability of current and potential methodologies for assessing host state proliferation risk and resistance to meet the needs of decision makers. Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles is a summary of presentations and discussions that transpired at the workshop-held on August 1-2, 2011-prepared by a designated rapporteur following the workshop. It does not provide findings and recommendations or represent a consensus reached by the symposium participants or the workshop planning committee. However, several themes emerged through the workshop: nonproliferation and new technologies, separate policy and technical cultures, value of proliferation resistance analysis, usefulness of social science approaches. The workshop was organized as part of a larger project undertaken by the NRC, the next phase of which (following the workshop) will be a consensus study on improving the assessment of proliferation risks associated with nuclear fuel cycles. This study will culminate in a report prepared by a committee of experts with expertise in risk assessment and communication, proliferation metrics and research, nuclear fuel cycle facility design and engineering, international nuclear nonproliferation and national security policy, and nuclear weapons design. This report is planned for completion in the spring of 2013 TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Power Resources / Nuclear bisacsh National security fast Nuclear facilities / Security measures fast Nuclear fuels / Research fast Nuclear power plants / Risk assessment fast Nuclear power plants / Security measures fast Nuclear terrorism / Prevention fast Nuclear fuels Research United States Congresses Nuclear fuels Safety regulations Government policy United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Risk assessment United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Security measures United States Congresses Nuclear facilities Security measures United States Congresses National security United States Congresses Nuclear terrorism United States Prevention Congresses |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary |
| title_auth | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary |
| title_exact_search | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary |
| title_full | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary Sarah C. Case, rapporteur ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_fullStr | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary Sarah C. Case, rapporteur ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary Sarah C. Case, rapporteur ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_short | Proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles |
| title_sort | proliferation risk in nuclear fuel cycles workshop summary |
| title_sub | workshop summary |
| topic | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Power Resources / Nuclear bisacsh National security fast Nuclear facilities / Security measures fast Nuclear fuels / Research fast Nuclear power plants / Risk assessment fast Nuclear power plants / Security measures fast Nuclear terrorism / Prevention fast Nuclear fuels Research United States Congresses Nuclear fuels Safety regulations Government policy United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Risk assessment United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Security measures United States Congresses Nuclear facilities Security measures United States Congresses National security United States Congresses Nuclear terrorism United States Prevention Congresses |
| topic_facet | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Power Resources / Nuclear National security Nuclear facilities / Security measures Nuclear fuels / Research Nuclear power plants / Risk assessment Nuclear power plants / Security measures Nuclear terrorism / Prevention Nuclear fuels Research United States Congresses Nuclear fuels Safety regulations Government policy United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Risk assessment United States Congresses Nuclear power plants Security measures United States Congresses Nuclear facilities Security measures United States Congresses National security United States Congresses Nuclear terrorism United States Prevention Congresses Konferenzschrift |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT casesarahc proliferationriskinnuclearfuelcyclesworkshopsummary AT nationalresearchcouncilus proliferationriskinnuclearfuelcyclesworkshopsummary |