Managing spent nuclear fuel: strategy alternatives and policy implications
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Monica, CA
RAND
2010
|
Schriftenreihe: | Rand Corporation monograph series
|
Schlagworte: | |
Beschreibung: | Print version record |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xxiii, 71 pages) illustrations |
ISBN: | 9780833051158 0833051156 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV045344237 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181206s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780833051158 |9 978-0-8330-5115-8 | ||
020 | |a 0833051156 |9 0-8330-5115-6 | ||
027 | |a RAND/MG-970-RC | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-4-ENC)ocn701720062 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)701720062 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045344237 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
082 | 0 | |a 363.72/895610973 |2 22 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Managing spent nuclear fuel |b strategy alternatives and policy implications |c Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA |b RAND |c 2010 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xxiii, 71 pages) |b illustrations | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Rand Corporation monograph series | |
500 | |a Print version record | ||
505 | 8 | |a Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs | |
650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE / Environmental Science |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Radioactive waste disposal / Government policy |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Spent reactor fuels / Storage / Government policy |2 fast | |
650 | 4 | |a Radioactive waste disposal |x Government policy |z United States |a Spent reactor fuels |x Storage |x Government policy |z United States | |
700 | 1 | |a LaTourrette, Tom |d 1963- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
710 | 2 | |a Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program) |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |t Managing spent nuclear fuel |d Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2010 |z 9780833051080 |
912 | |a ZDB-4-ENC | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030730941 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804179163771305984 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV045344237 |
collection | ZDB-4-ENC |
contents | Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-ENC)ocn701720062 (OCoLC)701720062 (DE-599)BVBBV045344237 |
dewey-full | 363.72/895610973 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 363 - Other social problems and services |
dewey-raw | 363.72/895610973 |
dewey-search | 363.72/895610973 |
dewey-sort | 3363.72 9895610973 |
dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
discipline | Soziologie |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03065nmm a2200421zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045344237</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181206s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780833051158</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8330-5115-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0833051156</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-5115-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="027" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RAND/MG-970-RC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-ENC)ocn701720062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)701720062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045344237</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">363.72/895610973</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Managing spent nuclear fuel</subfield><subfield code="b">strategy alternatives and policy implications</subfield><subfield code="c">Tom LaTourrette [and others]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xxiii, 71 pages)</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rand Corporation monograph series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE / Environmental Science</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Radioactive waste disposal / Government policy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Spent reactor fuels / Storage / Government policy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radioactive waste disposal</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="a">Spent reactor fuels</subfield><subfield code="x">Storage</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LaTourrette, Tom</subfield><subfield code="d">1963-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program)</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="t">Managing spent nuclear fuel</subfield><subfield code="d">Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2010</subfield><subfield code="z">9780833051080</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-ENC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030730941</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV045344237 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:15:30Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780833051158 0833051156 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030730941 |
oclc_num | 701720062 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 1 online resource (xxiii, 71 pages) illustrations |
psigel | ZDB-4-ENC |
publishDate | 2010 |
publishDateSearch | 2010 |
publishDateSort | 2010 |
publisher | RAND |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Rand Corporation monograph series |
spelling | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] Santa Monica, CA RAND 2010 1 online resource (xxiii, 71 pages) illustrations txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Rand Corporation monograph series Print version record Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs SCIENCE / Environmental Science bisacsh SCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear bisacsh Radioactive waste disposal / Government policy fast Spent reactor fuels / Storage / Government policy fast Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States LaTourrette, Tom 1963- Sonstige oth Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program) Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Managing spent nuclear fuel Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2010 9780833051080 |
spellingShingle | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs SCIENCE / Environmental Science bisacsh SCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear bisacsh Radioactive waste disposal / Government policy fast Spent reactor fuels / Storage / Government policy fast Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States |
title | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_auth | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_exact_search | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_full | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
title_fullStr | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
title_full_unstemmed | Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
title_short | Managing spent nuclear fuel |
title_sort | managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_sub | strategy alternatives and policy implications |
topic | SCIENCE / Environmental Science bisacsh SCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear bisacsh Radioactive waste disposal / Government policy fast Spent reactor fuels / Storage / Government policy fast Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States |
topic_facet | SCIENCE / Environmental Science SCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear Radioactive waste disposal / Government policy Spent reactor fuels / Storage / Government policy Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States |
work_keys_str_mv | AT latourrettetom managingspentnuclearfuelstrategyalternativesandpolicyimplications AT randenvironmentenergyandeconomicdevelopmentprogram managingspentnuclearfuelstrategyalternativesandpolicyimplications |