Judicial review in Norway:
"Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge [UK]
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Comparative constitutional law and policy
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism"... |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource |
| ISBN: | 9781108617727 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781108617727 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045276466 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181107s2018 xxk|||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108617727 |c Online |9 9781108617727 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781108617727 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108617727 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1065770478 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045276466 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KKN2650 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.481/012 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kierulf, Anine |d 1974- |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial review in Norway |c Anine Kierulf |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge [UK] |b Cambridge University Press |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Comparative constitutional law and policy | |
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | |a "Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism"... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial review |z Norway | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z Norway | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-108-42668-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030664133 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179046621249536 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Kierulf, Anine 1974- |
| author_facet | Kierulf, Anine 1974- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kierulf, Anine 1974- |
| author_variant | a k ak |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045276466 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KKN2650 |
| callnumber-raw | KKN2650 |
| callnumber-search | KKN2650 |
| callnumber-sort | KKN 42650 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108617727 (OCoLC)1065770478 (DE-599)BVBBV045276466 |
| dewey-full | 347.481/012 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.481/012 |
| dewey-search | 347.481/012 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.481 212 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781108617727 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02582nmm a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045276466</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181107s2018 xxk|||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108617727</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">9781108617727</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781108617727</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108617727</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1065770478</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045276466</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KKN2650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.481/012</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kierulf, Anine</subfield><subfield code="d">1974-</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review in Norway</subfield><subfield code="c">Anine Kierulf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge [UK]</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Comparative constitutional law and policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="z">Norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">Norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-42668-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030664133</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045276466 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:13:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108617727 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030664133 |
| oclc_num | 1065770478 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Comparative constitutional law and policy |
| spelling | Kierulf, Anine 1974- aut Judicial review in Norway Anine Kierulf Cambridge [UK] Cambridge University Press 2018 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Comparative constitutional law and policy Includes bibliographical references and index "Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism"... Judicial review Norway Constitutional law Norway Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-108-42668-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Kierulf, Anine 1974- Judicial review in Norway Judicial review Norway Constitutional law Norway |
| title | Judicial review in Norway |
| title_auth | Judicial review in Norway |
| title_exact_search | Judicial review in Norway |
| title_full | Judicial review in Norway Anine Kierulf |
| title_fullStr | Judicial review in Norway Anine Kierulf |
| title_full_unstemmed | Judicial review in Norway Anine Kierulf |
| title_short | Judicial review in Norway |
| title_sort | judicial review in norway |
| topic | Judicial review Norway Constitutional law Norway |
| topic_facet | Judicial review Norway Constitutional law Norway |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kierulfanine judicialreviewinnorway |