Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: an argument against legalisation
"Whether the law should permit voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide is one of the most weighty and controversial questions facing modern societies. Internationally, the main obstacle to legalisation has proved to be the argument that, even if they were morally acceptable in ce...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Ausgabe: | Second edition |
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge bioethics and law
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-92 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Whether the law should permit voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide is one of the most weighty and controversial questions facing modern societies. Internationally, the main obstacle to legalisation has proved to be the argument that, even if they were morally acceptable in certain 'hard cases', they could not be effectively controlled and society would slide down a 'slippery slope' to practices that most people would agree to be morally unacceptable. In particular, the argument runs, the law could not prevent the killing of patients who did not make a truly free and properly informed request, or for whom palliative care would have offered a viable alternative, and for an ever-expanding range of reasons. How cogent is this argument? This book provides the general reader (who need have no expertise in philosophy, law or medicine) with a lucid introduction to this central question in the debate, largely by reviewing the experience of three jurisdictions that have relaxed their laws: the Netherlands, Belgium and the US state of Oregon. The book will interest readers, whatever their views on the ethics of voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, who wish to ensure that their opinion about whether they should be legally permitted is better informed"... |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource |
ISBN: | 9781107337909 |
DOI: | 10.1017/9781107337909 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV045265742 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181031s2018 xxk|||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781107337909 |9 9781107337909 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781107337909 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1061556874 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045265742 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-92 | ||
050 | 0 | |a K3611.E95 | |
082 | 0 | |a 179.7 |2 23 | |
084 | |a CC 7264 |0 (DE-625)17679: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a PJ 2300 |0 (DE-625)136656: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Keown, John |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1032091967 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Euthanasia, ethics and public policy |b an argument against legalisation |c John Keown, Georgetown University, Washington DC. |
250 | |a Second edition | ||
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom |b Cambridge University Press |c 2018 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge bioethics and law | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
520 | |a "Whether the law should permit voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide is one of the most weighty and controversial questions facing modern societies. Internationally, the main obstacle to legalisation has proved to be the argument that, even if they were morally acceptable in certain 'hard cases', they could not be effectively controlled and society would slide down a 'slippery slope' to practices that most people would agree to be morally unacceptable. In particular, the argument runs, the law could not prevent the killing of patients who did not make a truly free and properly informed request, or for whom palliative care would have offered a viable alternative, and for an ever-expanding range of reasons. How cogent is this argument? This book provides the general reader (who need have no expertise in philosophy, law or medicine) with a lucid introduction to this central question in the debate, largely by reviewing the experience of three jurisdictions that have relaxed their laws: the Netherlands, Belgium and the US state of Oregon. The book will interest readers, whatever their views on the ethics of voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, who wish to ensure that their opinion about whether they should be legally permitted is better informed"... | ||
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Medical Law & Legislation / bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a Euthanasia |x Law and legislation | |
650 | 4 | |a Terminal care |x Law and legislation | |
650 | 4 | |a Euthanasia |x Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Terminal care |x Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Medical Law & Legislation | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sterbehilfe |0 (DE-588)4077877-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Sterbehilfe |0 (DE-588)4077877-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-107-61833-6 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, paperback |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030653595 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909 |l DE-92 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q FHN_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1811034791976370176 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Keown, John |
author_GND | (DE-588)1032091967 |
author_facet | Keown, John |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Keown, John |
author_variant | j k jk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV045265742 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | K3611 |
callnumber-raw | K3611.E95 |
callnumber-search | K3611.E95 |
callnumber-sort | K 43611 E95 |
callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
classification_rvk | CC 7264 PJ 2300 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781107337909 (OCoLC)1061556874 (DE-599)BVBBV045265742 |
dewey-full | 179.7 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 179 - Other ethical norms |
dewey-raw | 179.7 |
dewey-search | 179.7 |
dewey-sort | 3179.7 |
dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft Philosophie |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781107337909 |
edition | Second edition |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045265742</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181031s2018 xxk|||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107337909</subfield><subfield code="9">9781107337909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781107337909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1061556874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045265742</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K3611.E95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">179.7</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7264</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17679:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PJ 2300</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136656:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keown, John</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1032091967</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Euthanasia, ethics and public policy</subfield><subfield code="b">an argument against legalisation</subfield><subfield code="c">John Keown, Georgetown University, Washington DC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Second edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge bioethics and law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Whether the law should permit voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide is one of the most weighty and controversial questions facing modern societies. Internationally, the main obstacle to legalisation has proved to be the argument that, even if they were morally acceptable in certain 'hard cases', they could not be effectively controlled and society would slide down a 'slippery slope' to practices that most people would agree to be morally unacceptable. In particular, the argument runs, the law could not prevent the killing of patients who did not make a truly free and properly informed request, or for whom palliative care would have offered a viable alternative, and for an ever-expanding range of reasons. How cogent is this argument? This book provides the general reader (who need have no expertise in philosophy, law or medicine) with a lucid introduction to this central question in the debate, largely by reviewing the experience of three jurisdictions that have relaxed their laws: the Netherlands, Belgium and the US state of Oregon. The book will interest readers, whatever their views on the ethics of voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, who wish to ensure that their opinion about whether they should be legally permitted is better informed"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Medical Law & Legislation / bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Euthanasia</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Terminal care</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Euthanasia</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Terminal care</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Medical Law & Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sterbehilfe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077877-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sterbehilfe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077877-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-61833-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, paperback</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030653595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">FHN_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV045265742 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-09-24T00:22:46Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781107337909 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030653595 |
oclc_num | 1061556874 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-92 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-92 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO FHN_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSearch | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge bioethics and law |
spelling | Keown, John Verfasser (DE-588)1032091967 aut Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation John Keown, Georgetown University, Washington DC. Second edition Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 2018 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge bioethics and law Includes bibliographical references and index "Whether the law should permit voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide is one of the most weighty and controversial questions facing modern societies. Internationally, the main obstacle to legalisation has proved to be the argument that, even if they were morally acceptable in certain 'hard cases', they could not be effectively controlled and society would slide down a 'slippery slope' to practices that most people would agree to be morally unacceptable. In particular, the argument runs, the law could not prevent the killing of patients who did not make a truly free and properly informed request, or for whom palliative care would have offered a viable alternative, and for an ever-expanding range of reasons. How cogent is this argument? This book provides the general reader (who need have no expertise in philosophy, law or medicine) with a lucid introduction to this central question in the debate, largely by reviewing the experience of three jurisdictions that have relaxed their laws: the Netherlands, Belgium and the US state of Oregon. The book will interest readers, whatever their views on the ethics of voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, who wish to ensure that their opinion about whether they should be legally permitted is better informed"... LAW / Medical Law & Legislation / bisacsh Euthanasia Law and legislation Terminal care Law and legislation Euthanasia Moral and ethical aspects Terminal care Moral and ethical aspects LAW / Medical Law & Legislation Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 gnd rswk-swf Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 s Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-107-61833-6 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, paperback https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Keown, John Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation LAW / Medical Law & Legislation / bisacsh Euthanasia Law and legislation Terminal care Law and legislation Euthanasia Moral and ethical aspects Terminal care Moral and ethical aspects LAW / Medical Law & Legislation Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4015602-3 (DE-588)4077877-0 |
title | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation |
title_auth | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation |
title_exact_search | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation |
title_full | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation John Keown, Georgetown University, Washington DC. |
title_fullStr | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation John Keown, Georgetown University, Washington DC. |
title_full_unstemmed | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation John Keown, Georgetown University, Washington DC. |
title_short | Euthanasia, ethics and public policy |
title_sort | euthanasia ethics and public policy an argument against legalisation |
title_sub | an argument against legalisation |
topic | LAW / Medical Law & Legislation / bisacsh Euthanasia Law and legislation Terminal care Law and legislation Euthanasia Moral and ethical aspects Terminal care Moral and ethical aspects LAW / Medical Law & Legislation Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 gnd |
topic_facet | LAW / Medical Law & Legislation / bisacsh Euthanasia Law and legislation Terminal care Law and legislation Euthanasia Moral and ethical aspects Terminal care Moral and ethical aspects LAW / Medical Law & Legislation Ethik Sterbehilfe |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keownjohn euthanasiaethicsandpublicpolicyanargumentagainstlegalisation |