Mental capacity in relationship: decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy
Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity, but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialo...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2017
|
| Ausgabe: | first published |
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge bioethics and law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity, but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships, as well as capacity assessments themselves, must display key competencies in order to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (page 241-250) and index |
| Beschreibung: | xiii, 258 pages 23 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781107164000 1107164001 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045265602 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20181123 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 181031s2017 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 017385980 | ||
| 015 | |a GBB755462 |2 dnb | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107164000 |9 978-1-107-16400-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 1107164001 |9 1-107-16400-1 | ||
| 020 | |c 9781316730492 (PDF ebook) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1076303974 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045265602 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-29 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC1020 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 344.044 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kong, Camillia |0 (DE-588)1171760604 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mental capacity in relationship |b decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |c Camillia Kong |
| 250 | |a first published | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a xiii, 258 pages |c 23 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge bioethics and law | |
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (page 241-250) and index | ||
| 520 | |a Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity, but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships, as well as capacity assessments themselves, must display key competencies in order to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Capacity and disability |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Capacity and disability |z England | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mental health laws |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mental health laws |z England | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mental Competency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Informed Consent | |
| 651 | 4 | |a United Kingdom | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i ebook version |z 9781316730492 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030653458&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030653458 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179025130684416 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | MENTAL CAPACITY IN RELATIONSHIP
/ KONG, CAMILLIAYYEAUTHOR
: 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
PROBLEMS WITH MENTAL CAPACITY
- MENTAL CAPACITY, LEGAL CAPACITY, AND RELATIONAL RIGHTS
- RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND THE PROMOTION OF DECISIONAL CAPACITY
- PROCEDURAL REASONING AND THE SOCIAL SPACE OF REASONS IN CAPACITY
ASSESSMENTS
- ETHICAL DUTIES OF SUPPORT AND INTERVENTION
- HERMENEUTIC COMPETENCE AND THE DIALOGICAL CONDITIONS OF CAPACITY
- RETHINKING CAPACITY
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Kong, Camillia |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1171760604 |
| author_facet | Kong, Camillia |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kong, Camillia |
| author_variant | c k ck |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045265602 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJC1020 |
| callnumber-raw | KJC1020 |
| callnumber-search | KJC1020 |
| callnumber-sort | KJC 41020 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1076303974 (DE-599)BVBBV045265602 |
| dewey-full | 344.044 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 344 - Labor, social, education & cultural law |
| dewey-raw | 344.044 |
| dewey-search | 344.044 |
| dewey-sort | 3344.044 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | first published |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02863nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045265602</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20181123 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181031s2017 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">017385980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBB755462</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107164000</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-16400-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1107164001</subfield><subfield code="9">1-107-16400-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">9781316730492 (PDF ebook)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1076303974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045265602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC1020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">344.044</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Camillia</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1171760604</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mental capacity in relationship</subfield><subfield code="b">decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy</subfield><subfield code="c">Camillia Kong</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">first published</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiii, 258 pages</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge bioethics and law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (page 241-250) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity, but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships, as well as capacity assessments themselves, must display key competencies in order to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capacity and disability</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capacity and disability</subfield><subfield code="z">England</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mental health laws</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mental health laws</subfield><subfield code="z">England</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mental Competency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informed Consent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United Kingdom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">ebook version</subfield><subfield code="z">9781316730492</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030653458&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030653458</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United Kingdom |
| geographic_facet | United Kingdom |
| id | DE-604.BV045265602 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:13:18Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107164000 1107164001 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 017385980 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030653458 |
| oclc_num | 1076303974 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 |
| physical | xiii, 258 pages 23 cm |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge bioethics and law |
| spelling | Kong, Camillia (DE-588)1171760604 aut Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong first published Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2017 xiii, 258 pages 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Cambridge bioethics and law Includes bibliographical references (page 241-250) and index Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity, but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships, as well as capacity assessments themselves, must display key competencies in order to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments Capacity and disability Europe Capacity and disability England Mental health laws Europe Mental health laws England Mental Competency Informed Consent United Kingdom ebook version 9781316730492 LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030653458&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Kong, Camillia Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Capacity and disability Europe Capacity and disability England Mental health laws Europe Mental health laws England Mental Competency Informed Consent |
| title | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| title_auth | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| title_exact_search | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| title_full | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong |
| title_fullStr | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong |
| title_short | Mental capacity in relationship |
| title_sort | mental capacity in relationship decision making dialogue and autonomy |
| title_sub | decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| topic | Capacity and disability Europe Capacity and disability England Mental health laws Europe Mental health laws England Mental Competency Informed Consent |
| topic_facet | Capacity and disability Europe Capacity and disability England Mental health laws Europe Mental health laws England Mental Competency Informed Consent United Kingdom |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030653458&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kongcamillia mentalcapacityinrelationshipdecisionmakingdialogueandautonomy |