The origin of oughtness: a case for metaethical conativism
How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin
De Gruyter
[2018]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Practical philosophy
volume 22 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-1046 DE-859 DE-860 DE-188 DE-473 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-858 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff she judges essential, but the opponents do not think this to be a major flaw. In an attempt to meet the problem of gridlock head-on, the current investigation approaches oughtness differently. I start with the introduction of a grounding framework for thinking about oughtness that allows a lucid presentation of the views on the market. It soon becomes clear that one necessary part of any plausible assessment of accounts of oughtness is a discussion of their adequacy conditions. I continue with a detailed evaluation of four different accounts, as presented by Halbig (2007), Schroeder (2007), Stemmer (2006), and Scanlon (2014). My main result is that desire-based or Humean theories of oughtness are more plausible because desire-independent accounts fail to explain something crucial: the for-me character of oughtness. Based on the insights gathered thus far, I then develop a new Humean theory – metaethical conativism – and defend it against some historically influential objections |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 284 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9783110599787 9783110599251 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/9783110599787 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045162940 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191115 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180903s2018 xx om||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110599787 |c OnlineAusgabe, PDF |9 978-3-11-059978-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110599251 |c OnlineAusgabe, EPUB |9 978-3-11-059925-1 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783110599787 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9783110599787 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1187432479 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045162940 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-473 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-1046 |a DE-188 |a DE-1043 |a DE-858 | ||
| 084 | |a CC 7200 |0 (DE-625)17672: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fischer, Stefan |d 1965- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)120081873 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The origin of oughtness |b a case for metaethical conativism |c Stefan Fischer |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin |b De Gruyter |c [2018] | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 284 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Practical philosophy |v volume 22 | |
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Universität Zürich |d 2016 | ||
| 520 | |a How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff she judges essential, but the opponents do not think this to be a major flaw. In an attempt to meet the problem of gridlock head-on, the current investigation approaches oughtness differently. I start with the introduction of a grounding framework for thinking about oughtness that allows a lucid presentation of the views on the market. It soon becomes clear that one necessary part of any plausible assessment of accounts of oughtness is a discussion of their adequacy conditions. I continue with a detailed evaluation of four different accounts, as presented by Halbig (2007), Schroeder (2007), Stemmer (2006), and Scanlon (2014). My main result is that desire-based or Humean theories of oughtness are more plausible because desire-independent accounts fail to explain something crucial: the for-me character of oughtness. Based on the insights gathered thus far, I then develop a new Humean theory – metaethical conativism – and defend it against some historically influential objections | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Normativität |0 (DE-588)4790832-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Metaethik |0 (DE-588)4169556-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sollen |0 (DE-588)4199566-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Sollen |0 (DE-588)4199566-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Metaethik |0 (DE-588)4169556-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Normativität |0 (DE-588)4790832-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-3-11-060072-8 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Practical philosophy |v volume 22 |w (DE-604)BV043854771 |9 22 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030552388 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-859 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-860 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-188 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q ZDB-23-DGG 2018 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-739 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-1043 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |l DE-858 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1824507425118486528 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Fischer, Stefan 1965- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)120081873 |
| author_facet | Fischer, Stefan 1965- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Fischer, Stefan 1965- |
| author_variant | s f sf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045162940 |
| classification_rvk | CC 7200 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9783110599787 (OCoLC)1187432479 (DE-599)BVBBV045162940 |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9783110599787 |
| format | Thesis Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045162940</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191115</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180903s2018 xx om||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="c">OnlineAusgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-059978-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110599251</subfield><subfield code="c">OnlineAusgabe, EPUB</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-059925-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9783110599787</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1187432479</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045162940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17672:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fischer, Stefan</subfield><subfield code="d">1965-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)120081873</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The origin of oughtness</subfield><subfield code="b">a case for metaethical conativism</subfield><subfield code="c">Stefan Fischer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 284 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Practical philosophy</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Universität Zürich</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff she judges essential, but the opponents do not think this to be a major flaw. In an attempt to meet the problem of gridlock head-on, the current investigation approaches oughtness differently. I start with the introduction of a grounding framework for thinking about oughtness that allows a lucid presentation of the views on the market. It soon becomes clear that one necessary part of any plausible assessment of accounts of oughtness is a discussion of their adequacy conditions. I continue with a detailed evaluation of four different accounts, as presented by Halbig (2007), Schroeder (2007), Stemmer (2006), and Scanlon (2014). My main result is that desire-based or Humean theories of oughtness are more plausible because desire-independent accounts fail to explain something crucial: the for-me character of oughtness. Based on the insights gathered thus far, I then develop a new Humean theory – metaethical conativism – and defend it against some historically influential objections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Normativität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4790832-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metaethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4169556-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sollen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4199566-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sollen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4199566-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Metaethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4169556-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Normativität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4790832-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-060072-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Practical philosophy</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV043854771</subfield><subfield code="9">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030552388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB-23-DGG 2018</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV045162940 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:24:31Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783110599787 9783110599251 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030552388 |
| oclc_num | 1187432479 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-859 DE-860 DE-1046 DE-188 DE-1043 DE-858 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-859 DE-860 DE-1046 DE-188 DE-1043 DE-858 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 284 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG 2018 ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Practical philosophy |
| series2 | Practical philosophy |
| spelling | Fischer, Stefan 1965- Verfasser (DE-588)120081873 aut The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism Stefan Fischer Berlin De Gruyter [2018] 1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 284 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Practical philosophy volume 22 Dissertation Universität Zürich 2016 How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff she judges essential, but the opponents do not think this to be a major flaw. In an attempt to meet the problem of gridlock head-on, the current investigation approaches oughtness differently. I start with the introduction of a grounding framework for thinking about oughtness that allows a lucid presentation of the views on the market. It soon becomes clear that one necessary part of any plausible assessment of accounts of oughtness is a discussion of their adequacy conditions. I continue with a detailed evaluation of four different accounts, as presented by Halbig (2007), Schroeder (2007), Stemmer (2006), and Scanlon (2014). My main result is that desire-based or Humean theories of oughtness are more plausible because desire-independent accounts fail to explain something crucial: the for-me character of oughtness. Based on the insights gathered thus far, I then develop a new Humean theory – metaethical conativism – and defend it against some historically influential objections Normativität (DE-588)4790832-4 gnd rswk-swf Metaethik (DE-588)4169556-2 gnd rswk-swf Sollen (DE-588)4199566-1 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Sollen (DE-588)4199566-1 s Metaethik (DE-588)4169556-2 s Normativität (DE-588)4790832-4 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-3-11-060072-8 Practical philosophy volume 22 (DE-604)BV043854771 22 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Fischer, Stefan 1965- The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism Practical philosophy Normativität (DE-588)4790832-4 gnd Metaethik (DE-588)4169556-2 gnd Sollen (DE-588)4199566-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4790832-4 (DE-588)4169556-2 (DE-588)4199566-1 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism |
| title_auth | The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism |
| title_exact_search | The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism |
| title_full | The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism Stefan Fischer |
| title_fullStr | The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism Stefan Fischer |
| title_full_unstemmed | The origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism Stefan Fischer |
| title_short | The origin of oughtness |
| title_sort | the origin of oughtness a case for metaethical conativism |
| title_sub | a case for metaethical conativism |
| topic | Normativität (DE-588)4790832-4 gnd Metaethik (DE-588)4169556-2 gnd Sollen (DE-588)4199566-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Normativität Metaethik Sollen Hochschulschrift |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599787 |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV043854771 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fischerstefan theoriginofoughtnessacaseformetaethicalconativism |