Hate: why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship
We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. The emergence of the alt-right alone has fueled a marked increase in racist and anti-Semitic speech. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen's HATE dispels the many misunderstandings that have cloude...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Oxford University Press
[2018]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Inalienable rights
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. The emergence of the alt-right alone has fueled a marked increase in racist and anti-Semitic speech. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen's HATE dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech." She argues that an expansive approach to the First Amendment is most effective at promoting democracy, equality, and societal harmony. Proponents of anti-hate speech laws stress the harms that they fear such speech might lead to: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been no rigorous analysis to date of whether the laws effectively counter the feared harms. This book fills that gap, examining our actual experience with such laws. It shows that they are not effective in reducing the feared harms, and worse yet, are likely counterproductive. Even in established democracies, enforcement officials use the power these laws give them to suppress vital expression and target minority viewpoints, as was the case in earlier periods of U.S. history. The solution instead, as Strossen shows, is to promote equality and societal harmony through the increasingly vibrant "counterspeech" activism that has been flourishing on U.S. college campuses and in some global human rights movements. Strossen's powerful argument on behalf of free expression promises to shift the debate around this perennially contentious topic. ... "Dispelling rampant confusion about "hate speech," this book explains how U.S. law appropriately distinguishes between punishable and protected discriminatory speech. It shows that more speech-restrictive laws consistently have suppressed vital expression about public issues, targeting minority viewpoints and speakers; and that "counterspeech" has more effectively promoted equality and societal harmony"... |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
Beschreibung: | XXV, 199 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9780190859121 9780190859138 9780190859145 9780190089009 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV044986899 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20220128 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 180606s2018 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 017054213 | ||
020 | |a 9780190859121 |c hardback |9 978-0-19-085912-1 | ||
020 | |a 9780190859138 |9 978-0-19-085913-8 | ||
020 | |a 9780190859145 |9 978-0-19-085914-5 | ||
020 | |a 9780190089009 |c Paperback: GBP 10.99 |9 978-0-19-008900-9 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1042914989 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044986899 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-29 |a DE-188 |a DE-473 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF9345 | |
082 | 0 | |a 342.7308/53 |2 23 | |
084 | |a MG 70170 |0 (DE-625)122860:12062 |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Strossen, Nadine |d 1950- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)11576786X |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Hate |b why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship |c Nadine Strossen |
264 | 1 | |a New York |b Oxford University Press |c [2018] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2018 | |
300 | |a XXV, 199 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Inalienable rights | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
520 | |a We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. The emergence of the alt-right alone has fueled a marked increase in racist and anti-Semitic speech. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen's HATE dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech." She argues that an expansive approach to the First Amendment is most effective at promoting democracy, equality, and societal harmony. Proponents of anti-hate speech laws stress the harms that they fear such speech might lead to: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been no rigorous analysis to date of whether the laws effectively counter the feared harms. This book fills that gap, examining our actual experience with such laws. It shows that they are not effective in reducing the feared harms, and worse yet, are likely counterproductive. Even in established democracies, enforcement officials use the power these laws give them to suppress vital expression and target minority viewpoints, as was the case in earlier periods of U.S. history. The solution instead, as Strossen shows, is to promote equality and societal harmony through the increasingly vibrant "counterspeech" activism that has been flourishing on U.S. college campuses and in some global human rights movements. Strossen's powerful argument on behalf of free expression promises to shift the debate around this perennially contentious topic. ... | ||
520 | |a "Dispelling rampant confusion about "hate speech," this book explains how U.S. law appropriately distinguishes between punishable and protected discriminatory speech. It shows that more speech-restrictive laws consistently have suppressed vital expression about public issues, targeting minority viewpoints and speakers; and that "counterspeech" has more effectively promoted equality and societal harmony"... | ||
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Constitutional / bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Government / General / bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Discrimination / bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a Hate speech |x Law and legislation |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of speech |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Constitutional | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Government / General | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Discrimination | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Meinungsfreiheit |0 (DE-588)4038463-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Redefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4177296-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Zensur |0 (DE-588)4067601-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Hassrede |0 (DE-588)1155206169 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Redefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4177296-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Meinungsfreiheit |0 (DE-588)4038463-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Hassrede |0 (DE-588)1155206169 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Zensur |0 (DE-588)4067601-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030379170&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030379170 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1815619935499452416 |
---|---|
adam_text |
HATE
/ STROSSEN, NADINEYYEAUTHOR
: 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
CHAPTER 2
CHAPTER 3
CHAPTER 4
CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 6
CHAPTER 7
CHAPTER 8
APPEN DIX A
APPENDIX B
CONCLUSION: LOOKING BACK - AND FORWARD
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT. |
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Strossen, Nadine 1950- |
author_GND | (DE-588)11576786X |
author_facet | Strossen, Nadine 1950- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Strossen, Nadine 1950- |
author_variant | n s ns |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV044986899 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF9345 |
callnumber-raw | KF9345 |
callnumber-search | KF9345 |
callnumber-sort | KF 49345 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
classification_rvk | MG 70170 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1042914989 (DE-599)BVBBV044986899 |
dewey-full | 342.7308/53 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.7308/53 |
dewey-search | 342.7308/53 |
dewey-sort | 3342.7308 253 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft Politologie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044986899</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220128</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180606s2018 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">017054213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190859121</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-085912-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190859138</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-085913-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190859145</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-085914-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780190089009</subfield><subfield code="c">Paperback: GBP 10.99</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-008900-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1042914989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044986899</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF9345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/53</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 70170</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122860:12062</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strossen, Nadine</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)11576786X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hate</subfield><subfield code="b">why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship</subfield><subfield code="c">Nadine Strossen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXV, 199 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Inalienable rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. The emergence of the alt-right alone has fueled a marked increase in racist and anti-Semitic speech. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen's HATE dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech." She argues that an expansive approach to the First Amendment is most effective at promoting democracy, equality, and societal harmony. Proponents of anti-hate speech laws stress the harms that they fear such speech might lead to: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been no rigorous analysis to date of whether the laws effectively counter the feared harms. This book fills that gap, examining our actual experience with such laws. It shows that they are not effective in reducing the feared harms, and worse yet, are likely counterproductive. Even in established democracies, enforcement officials use the power these laws give them to suppress vital expression and target minority viewpoints, as was the case in earlier periods of U.S. history. The solution instead, as Strossen shows, is to promote equality and societal harmony through the increasingly vibrant "counterspeech" activism that has been flourishing on U.S. college campuses and in some global human rights movements. Strossen's powerful argument on behalf of free expression promises to shift the debate around this perennially contentious topic. ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Dispelling rampant confusion about "hate speech," this book explains how U.S. law appropriately distinguishes between punishable and protected discriminatory speech. It shows that more speech-restrictive laws consistently have suppressed vital expression about public issues, targeting minority viewpoints and speakers; and that "counterspeech" has more effectively promoted equality and societal harmony"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Constitutional / bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Government / General / bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Discrimination / bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hate speech</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Constitutional</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Government / General</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Discrimination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Meinungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038463-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Redefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177296-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zensur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4067601-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hassrede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1155206169</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Redefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177296-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Meinungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038463-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Hassrede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1155206169</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zensur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4067601-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030379170&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030379170</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV044986899 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-13T15:01:40Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780190859121 9780190859138 9780190859145 9780190089009 |
language | English |
lccn | 017054213 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030379170 |
oclc_num | 1042914989 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-29 DE-188 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-29 DE-188 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | XXV, 199 Seiten |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSearch | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Inalienable rights |
spelling | Strossen, Nadine 1950- Verfasser (DE-588)11576786X aut Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship Nadine Strossen New York Oxford University Press [2018] © 2018 XXV, 199 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Inalienable rights Includes bibliographical references and index We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. The emergence of the alt-right alone has fueled a marked increase in racist and anti-Semitic speech. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen's HATE dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech." She argues that an expansive approach to the First Amendment is most effective at promoting democracy, equality, and societal harmony. Proponents of anti-hate speech laws stress the harms that they fear such speech might lead to: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been no rigorous analysis to date of whether the laws effectively counter the feared harms. This book fills that gap, examining our actual experience with such laws. It shows that they are not effective in reducing the feared harms, and worse yet, are likely counterproductive. Even in established democracies, enforcement officials use the power these laws give them to suppress vital expression and target minority viewpoints, as was the case in earlier periods of U.S. history. The solution instead, as Strossen shows, is to promote equality and societal harmony through the increasingly vibrant "counterspeech" activism that has been flourishing on U.S. college campuses and in some global human rights movements. Strossen's powerful argument on behalf of free expression promises to shift the debate around this perennially contentious topic. ... "Dispelling rampant confusion about "hate speech," this book explains how U.S. law appropriately distinguishes between punishable and protected discriminatory speech. It shows that more speech-restrictive laws consistently have suppressed vital expression about public issues, targeting minority viewpoints and speakers; and that "counterspeech" has more effectively promoted equality and societal harmony"... LAW / Constitutional / bisacsh LAW / Government / General / bisacsh LAW / Discrimination / bisacsh Hate speech Law and legislation United States Freedom of speech United States LAW / Constitutional LAW / Government / General LAW / Discrimination Meinungsfreiheit (DE-588)4038463-9 gnd rswk-swf Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd rswk-swf Zensur (DE-588)4067601-8 gnd rswk-swf Hassrede (DE-588)1155206169 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 s Meinungsfreiheit (DE-588)4038463-9 s Hassrede (DE-588)1155206169 s Zensur (DE-588)4067601-8 s DE-604 LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030379170&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Strossen, Nadine 1950- Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship LAW / Constitutional / bisacsh LAW / Government / General / bisacsh LAW / Discrimination / bisacsh Hate speech Law and legislation United States Freedom of speech United States LAW / Constitutional LAW / Government / General LAW / Discrimination Meinungsfreiheit (DE-588)4038463-9 gnd Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd Zensur (DE-588)4067601-8 gnd Hassrede (DE-588)1155206169 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4038463-9 (DE-588)4177296-9 (DE-588)4067601-8 (DE-588)1155206169 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship |
title_auth | Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship |
title_exact_search | Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship |
title_full | Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship Nadine Strossen |
title_fullStr | Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship Nadine Strossen |
title_full_unstemmed | Hate why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship Nadine Strossen |
title_short | Hate |
title_sort | hate why we should resist it with free speech not censorship |
title_sub | why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship |
topic | LAW / Constitutional / bisacsh LAW / Government / General / bisacsh LAW / Discrimination / bisacsh Hate speech Law and legislation United States Freedom of speech United States LAW / Constitutional LAW / Government / General LAW / Discrimination Meinungsfreiheit (DE-588)4038463-9 gnd Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd Zensur (DE-588)4067601-8 gnd Hassrede (DE-588)1155206169 gnd |
topic_facet | LAW / Constitutional / bisacsh LAW / Government / General / bisacsh LAW / Discrimination / bisacsh Hate speech Law and legislation United States Freedom of speech United States LAW / Constitutional LAW / Government / General LAW / Discrimination Meinungsfreiheit Redefreiheit Zensur Hassrede USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030379170&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strossennadine hatewhyweshouldresistitwithfreespeechnotcensorship |